Settings
Light Theme
Dark Theme
Podcast Cover

The Epstein Chronicles

  • Explicit

    Judge Gull Rules No Cameras Will Be Present For Richard Allen's Trial And A Rachel Morin Update (4/25/24)

    25 APR 2024 · Rachel Morin's family continues to put the pressure on investigators as they seek justice for their murdered loved one, vowing to not give up until the person responsible has been brought to justice.   They previously used a flyer campaign in California and Maryland and now, they are taking it to the next level with a new strategy.     In our second article, we head back down to Delphi where Judge Gull has ordered that Camera's will not be allowed in the courtroom for the trial of Richard Allen.   This comes on the back of several other decisions made by the court that have come under scrutiny, and this one is sure to meet the same. (commercial at 9:36) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com/rachel-morin-family-releases-video-173745776.html source: https://fox59.com/news/indycrime/judge-wont-allow-cameras-in-delphi-murders-trial/
    14m 3s
  • Explicit

    Karen Read Court Documents: The State's Opposition To Karen Reads Brief Seeking Relief (Part 5) (4/25/24)

    25 APR 2024 · The "Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3" refers to a legal document filed in Massachusetts under General Laws Chapter 211, Section 3. This statute grants the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) broad discretionary authority to hear certain cases. Individuals or entities typically file such petitions when they believe they have been denied relief or treated unfairly by a lower court, and they seek the SJC's intervention. The petition, accompanied by a brief, outlines the legal arguments and factual basis for why the SJC should grant relief. This type of petition is often used as a last resort when there are no other adequate legal remedies available. The brief accompanying the petition presents the legal arguments in support of the petitioner's position, citing relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional provisions. It aims to persuade the court to exercise its discretionary authority to grant the relief sought by the petitioner. Where as: The "Opposition to Defendant's Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3" is a legal document filed in response to a defendant's petition seeking relief under General Laws Chapter 211, Section 3 in Massachusetts. When a defendant files a petition and brief seeking relief under G. L. c. 211, §3, claiming unfair treatment or seeking intervention by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC), the opposing party may file an opposition. The opposition typically presents counter-arguments to the defendant's claims, challenging the legal and factual basis for relief. It may also argue against the necessity or appropriateness of the SJC's intervention in the case. The opposition brief aims to persuade the court to deny the relief sought by the defendant and to uphold the decision or actions of the lower court. Like the original petition and brief, the opposition is crafted to provide legal reasoning, citing relevant statutes, case law, and constitutional provisions. In this episode, we begin our look at the currently available Karen Read trial court documents and to do that, we are starting with Opposition to Defendant's Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3. (commercial at 9:15) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    15m 58s
  • Explicit

    Karen Read Court Documents: The State's Opposition To Karen Reads Brief Seeking Relief (Part 4) (4/25/24)

    25 APR 2024 · The "Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3" refers to a legal document filed in Massachusetts under General Laws Chapter 211, Section 3. This statute grants the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) broad discretionary authority to hear certain cases. Individuals or entities typically file such petitions when they believe they have been denied relief or treated unfairly by a lower court, and they seek the SJC's intervention. The petition, accompanied by a brief, outlines the legal arguments and factual basis for why the SJC should grant relief. This type of petition is often used as a last resort when there are no other adequate legal remedies available. The brief accompanying the petition presents the legal arguments in support of the petitioner's position, citing relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional provisions. It aims to persuade the court to exercise its discretionary authority to grant the relief sought by the petitioner. Where as: The "Opposition to Defendant's Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3" is a legal document filed in response to a defendant's petition seeking relief under General Laws Chapter 211, Section 3 in Massachusetts. When a defendant files a petition and brief seeking relief under G. L. c. 211, §3, claiming unfair treatment or seeking intervention by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC), the opposing party may file an opposition. The opposition typically presents counter-arguments to the defendant's claims, challenging the legal and factual basis for relief. It may also argue against the necessity or appropriateness of the SJC's intervention in the case. The opposition brief aims to persuade the court to deny the relief sought by the defendant and to uphold the decision or actions of the lower court. Like the original petition and brief, the opposition is crafted to provide legal reasoning, citing relevant statutes, case law, and constitutional provisions. In this episode, we begin our look at the currently available Karen Read trial court documents and to do that, we are starting with Opposition to Defendant's Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3. (commercial at 7:25) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    12m 55s
  • Explicit

    A Look Back: Mary Doe And Her Claims Against Jeffrey Epstein's Estate (Part 2)

    25 APR 2024 · Our dive into the Epstein court documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the allegations made against the Jeffrey Epstein estate by Mary Doe. (commercial at 19:01) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16508926
    26m 27s
  • Explicit

    A Look Back: Mary Doe And Her Claims Against Jeffrey Epstein's Estate (Part 1)

    25 APR 2024 · Our dive into the Epstein court documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the allegations made against the Jeffrey Epstein estate by Mary Doe. (commercial at 7:11) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.vicourts.org/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx?itemId=16508926
    11m 53s
  • Explicit

    A Look Back: The Morally Bankrupt Ghislaine Maxwell

    25 APR 2024 · Ghislaine Maxwell was able to get away with her activities for years according to authorities and now, when the bill comes due those who spent time with her are claiming ignorance. Join me as I dive in. (Commercial at 11:42) To contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Source: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/527798-epstein-shadow-ghislaine-maxwell/
    25m
  • Explicit

    A Look Back: Harvey Weinstein, Ghislaine Maxwell And Their Shared Lawyer

    25 APR 2024 · Ghislaine Maxwell has brought in Harvey Weinstein's lawyer to try and help win her freedom. However, there is quite the hill for him to climb considering the chargers Maxwell was convicted of and the nature of the crimes she was involved in. Her new legal team has signaled that they are not going to argue her guilt or innocence (that would be a short arguement) but instead focus on her treatement by the federal government and the fact that she didn't get a fair (according to them) trial. Let's dive in and see what's up! (commercial at 9:01) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://pagesix.com/2023/01/06/ghislaine-maxwell-hiring-harvey-weinsteins-lawyer-in-appeal/
    11m 59s
  • Explicit

    A Look Back: Prince Andrew Get's Slapped With The Label Of A Sex Pest By A Massage Therapist

    24 APR 2024 · On tonight's episode we hear from a massage therapist who worked on Prince Andrew for over two months. She has quite the story to tell about how the rude and crude Prince of nothing conducted himself like a 'sexual pest' and how he acted in a completely inappropriate manner. (Commercial at 17:50) To contact me: https://protonmail.com/ source: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/8415640/prince-andrew-x-rated-questions-physio/
    25m 46s
  • Explicit

    A Look Back: Ghislaine Maxwell And The 36 Moves While She Was On The Lam

    24 APR 2024 · Ghislaine Maxwell and her team contended that the only reason she moved was to avoid the press during the last year while she was on the lam. In this episode, we take a look at the transient life she was leading before her arrest. (Commercial at 9:01) To contact me: https://protonmail.com/ source: https://nypost.com/2020/07/12/ghislaine-maxwell-moved-at-least-36-times-during-her-year-in-hiding/
    14m 2s
  • Explicit

    Karen Read Court Documents: The State's Opposition To Karen Reads Brief Seeking Relief (Part 3) (4/24/24)

    24 APR 2024 · The "Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3" refers to a legal document filed in Massachusetts under General Laws Chapter 211, Section 3. This statute grants the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) broad discretionary authority to hear certain cases. Individuals or entities typically file such petitions when they believe they have been denied relief or treated unfairly by a lower court, and they seek the SJC's intervention. The petition, accompanied by a brief, outlines the legal arguments and factual basis for why the SJC should grant relief. This type of petition is often used as a last resort when there are no other adequate legal remedies available. The brief accompanying the petition presents the legal arguments in support of the petitioner's position, citing relevant case law, statutes, and constitutional provisions. It aims to persuade the court to exercise its discretionary authority to grant the relief sought by the petitioner. Where as: The "Opposition to Defendant's Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3" is a legal document filed in response to a defendant's petition seeking relief under General Laws Chapter 211, Section 3 in Massachusetts. When a defendant files a petition and brief seeking relief under G. L. c. 211, §3, claiming unfair treatment or seeking intervention by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC), the opposing party may file an opposition. The opposition typically presents counter-arguments to the defendant's claims, challenging the legal and factual basis for relief. It may also argue against the necessity or appropriateness of the SJC's intervention in the case. The opposition brief aims to persuade the court to deny the relief sought by the defendant and to uphold the decision or actions of the lower court. Like the original petition and brief, the opposition is crafted to provide legal reasoning, citing relevant statutes, case law, and constitutional provisions. In this episode, we begin our look at the currently available Karen Read trial court documents and to do that, we are starting with Opposition to Defendant's Petition and Brief Seeking Relief Pursuant to G. L. c. 211, §3. (commercial at 8:30) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    13m 52s

Join “The Epstein Chronicles” Supporters Club

Start supporting this podcast and become part of their community.

Jeffrey Epstein was a multi millionaire who had political and business ties to some of the most rich and powerful people in the world. From businessmen to politicians at the...

show more
Jeffrey Epstein was a multi millionaire who had political and business ties to some of the most rich and powerful people in the world. From businessmen to politicians at the highest levels, Epstein broke bread with them all.

Yet for years the Legacy media and the rest of high society looked the other way and ignored his behavior as multiple women came forward with allegations of abuse.

Even after he was convicted and subsequently received a sweetheart deal those same so called elites welcomed him back with open arms.

Now after his death and the arrest of Maxwell, the real story is starting to come together and the curtain has begun to be drawn back and what it has revealed is truly disturbing.

From Princes to Ex Presidents, the cast of scoundrels in this play spans continents and political affiliations leaving us with a transcontinental criminal conspiracy possibly unlike any we have ever seen before.

In this podcast we will explore all of the levels of Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal enterprise.

From his most trusted assistants to obscure associates, we will leave no stone unturned as we swim through the muck searching for clarity and answers to some of the most pressing questions of the case.

From interviews with people directly involved in the case to daily updates, the Epstein Chronicles will have it all.

Just like our other project, The Jeffrey Epstein Show, you can expect no punches pulled and consistent content. We have covered the Epstein case daily(everyday since October 1st 2019) and will continue to do so until there are convictions. With a library of well over 1k shows, you can expect a ton of content coming your way including on scene reporting from the Maxwell trial and from places like Zorro Ranch.

Thank you for tuning in and I look forward to having you all along for the ride.




(Created and Hosted by Bobby Capucci)
show less
Contacts
Information

Looks like you don't have any active episode

Browse Spreaker Catalogue to discover great new content

Current

Looks like you don't have any episodes in your queue

Browse Spreaker Catalogue to discover great new content

Next Up

Episode Cover Episode Cover

It's so quiet here...

Time to discover new episodes!

Discover
Your Library
Search