Thank you Douglas! Very good point!

Good show, good points. One point you touched on addressing Bullet Point #2, I feel bears repeating, because it's an Important Caveat, IMO, re: Intellectually Honest Study of The Assassination. That is: The difference between A). Acknowledging Oswald as being Not Guilty of The Murder of JFK and JD Tippit (which most of US absolutely agree on) and 😎. Declaring LHO to be "Innocent". There's overwhelming evidence to back up (A), but little to back up (B). Its like Dr. Walt Brown writes in "The People V. Lee Harvey Oswald", whatever the circumstances, LHO allowed himself to be the Patsy for the Killers that day and~make no mistake~he knew EXACTLY who they were, but as far as we know, took that to his grave. And for THAT, writes Dr. Walt, there will always be blood on his hands. I stand with Dr. Walt. I'm nowhere near ready to call him "Innocent". Not Guilty? Absolutely. It's why I'm here. Peace, Ya'll. D \m/