The Future of Antitrust: New Challenges to the Consumer Welfare Paradigm and Legislative Proposals
Dec 12, 2019 ·
1h 19m 1s
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
Description
On November 14, 2019, the Federalist Society's Corporations, Securities, & Antitrust Practice Group hosted a panel for the 2019 National Lawyers Convention at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. The...
show more
On November 14, 2019, the Federalist Society's Corporations, Securities, & Antitrust Practice Group hosted a panel for the 2019 National Lawyers Convention at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC. The panel discussed "The Future of Antitrust: New Challenges to the Consumer Welfare Paradigm and Legislative Proposals".
Robert Bork’s consumer welfare paradigm, which has influenced the evolution of antitrust enforcement in the United States and globally over the past 40 years, is under attack. Critics, including members of Congress and Presidential candidates from both parties, assert not only that antitrust has been unable to keep up with developments in the high tech, finance, communications, and pharmaceutical fields, but that competition law should be used as a tool to address a much broader range of concerns, from privacy and employment to income inequality and non-discrimination in political viewpoint. In response to these concerns, DOJ and FTC have laid the groundwork for potential investigations of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. Calls to break those companies up have also spurred legislative proposals that would significantly change current merger review policy. It is critical to understand the arguments motivating this debate and why they are gaining traction now. Is it time to abandon or change the “consumer welfare” standard or to reconsider longstanding approaches to merger enforcement?
*******
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.
Featuring:
Hon. Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice
Prof. Gene Kimmelman, Professorial Lecturer in Law, George Washington University Law School
Hon. Maureen Ohlhausen, Partner, Baker Botts
Dr. Rainer Wessely, Delegation of the European Union to the United States
Moderator: Hon. John B. Nalbandian, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
show less
Robert Bork’s consumer welfare paradigm, which has influenced the evolution of antitrust enforcement in the United States and globally over the past 40 years, is under attack. Critics, including members of Congress and Presidential candidates from both parties, assert not only that antitrust has been unable to keep up with developments in the high tech, finance, communications, and pharmaceutical fields, but that competition law should be used as a tool to address a much broader range of concerns, from privacy and employment to income inequality and non-discrimination in political viewpoint. In response to these concerns, DOJ and FTC have laid the groundwork for potential investigations of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. Calls to break those companies up have also spurred legislative proposals that would significantly change current merger review policy. It is critical to understand the arguments motivating this debate and why they are gaining traction now. Is it time to abandon or change the “consumer welfare” standard or to reconsider longstanding approaches to merger enforcement?
*******
As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.
Featuring:
Hon. Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice
Prof. Gene Kimmelman, Professorial Lecturer in Law, George Washington University Law School
Hon. Maureen Ohlhausen, Partner, Baker Botts
Dr. Rainer Wessely, Delegation of the European Union to the United States
Moderator: Hon. John B. Nalbandian, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Information
Author | The Federalist Society |
Organization | The Federalist Society |
Website | - |
Tags |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company