The NEA President, Lily Eskelsen Garcia, claimed that unions and teachers in West Virginia “stood in solidarity,” while a teacher defiantly stated “Hell no” when instructed by her union to return to work.

Solidarity?

Sound more like strife if you ask me.

I’ll tell you this. If "solidarity" means that union members actually defy their leaders, do you want to be around when unions and their members REALLY disagree on something?

That would probably be a really ugly scene ...

But, back to the topic at hand, how can this be possible?

How is it possible that the perspectives of individuals who should be in complete agreement be so diametrically opposed when their benefits are on the line?

Hint: There is a hidden conflict of Interest.