Participating in this episode are Patrik, Martin and our guest David Mathisen. If you enjoy and want to support our work you can send a donation to SEB 5708 35 378 01
1)Intro, Wax on, wax off scene in Karate Kid
2)David Warner Mathisen has been exploring the connections between the ancient myths and the stars for over a decade and has authored nine books and dozens of videos documenting the system of celestial metaphor which forms the foundation for the myths, scriptures and sacred stories of
...See More cultures around the globe. His findings demonstrates the existence of an advanced esoteric system which was already fully mature by the time of the earliest extant texts known to conventional academia (including the texts from the oldest known civilizations such as ancient Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, ancient India and ancient China), and which can also be found operating in the myths of cultures in Africa, Australia, the Americas, and the islands of the Pacific.
Patrix: "And isn't it curious that they share the same God but still have very different views and have been fighting each other since their inception?" Who share the same God?
Regarding Mars and twins, that is a very interesting thought Fredrika. Kepler called Mars a star. I suspect that more than psychology can be encoded into the ancient myths and the key is how to interpret them.
I see what you mean Fredrika. Keep in mind though that the arts of deception and divide and conquer to control groups are much older than the abrahimitic religions. And isn't it curious that they share the same God but still have very different views and have been fighting each other since their inception? Ancient astronomy recognized that the Earth was stationary during the year and also the very slow precession. But mistakenly they assumed Earth to be completely stationary since no movement could be detected by the experiments they performed on the matter. If you shoot an arrow straight up it will come down at the same place. Ergo the Earth doesn't move. But in the 16th century this idea was questioned.
Clearly, this discussion of yours is an introduction to his work, and I have read none of his books, but form what I hear, there really is nothing new to his findings.
I get a big curious to read the book by H A Ray, but I feel hesitant as to what extent I want to allow Jews to define my whole world, even this cartoonist ”man Ray”. This is a bit like ”learning” about Norse myths from the Jew Neil Gaiman’s bestseller. Not just that Mr. Mathisen himself sounds very much like a Jew, but he refers to the Jew Freud’s oedipus complex as an example of how myths relate to psychology, while omitting the more important name in cultural archetypes, Carl Jung, who broke with the popmpous paedophile Zionist Freud. Also, the revealing book by the Jew H A Rey, was his initial source of inspiration, it seems, and he refers to the Jew Peter Levine’s work on trauma, and further the Jew and - of course - ”Holocaust survivor” Gabor Maté’s work on trauma, and I don’t remember who else.
Sure, it’s suitable to call me an anti-Semite, but I do read a lot of Jewish works, I’m just a bit wary of letting them define our WHOLE culture and understanding of things, and frankly, his reasoning gets very dopey, which is typical for the well-known culture of critique to which he clearly belongs.
All these discussions on sidereal matters and their relations to psychology are ancient , and can be found in his referred works, such as the Mahabarata. Regarding the Torah / Old testament, and if one wants to read Jewish works, Helena Hahn’s monumental works from the 1880’s go to great lenghts in explaining many of these old astronomical-astrological (the astrological part roughly corresponds to today’s field of psychology, and were, as Mathisen suggests, far more comprehensive and usable in understanding the human psyche). The most famous stellar story among Christians, more so than the story of ”Moses i vassen”, for reasons I cannot fathom, is Jonah and the Fish, which people discuss as if it at all was a question of a whale or whalefish, or fish, although it’s only an astronomical calculation of aeons when the sign of Pisces is visible above the horizon, (fish out of water) and the aeons when it is under the surface (below the horizon, from seen from Bharat), as Helena Hahn very poignantly describes, as told to her by masters of knowledge living in India at the time.
And Hahn would probably not agree with this knowledge being more important now than in ancient times, because this ”dark age” of gross materiality presents no fertil soil for celestial, or astral even, knowledge.
*Question* on Twins: Does David see that the myths on twins and their sidereal constellations have at all anything to do with our Solar system being a geoaxial double system? Did they know this, way back, say in India?
