00:00
14:58
This is an interesting talk (episode) for myself delving into a topic I know nothing about. I say so in part jest, at least from not having studied anything about what spatial thinking scientifically is or what 'geo' graphic conscious affective perspectives are (if they exist) and what those supposed areas of understanding imply so, I have to imagine how they may contribute towards my work.

However, from conjecture of a future research perspective I would love to explore and engage in it – just from spurious conjecture of what I guestimate the importance and implications of ‘it’ may be…

Following up from the previous (just uploaded episode prior to this one) talk about the CARES model of community engagement in the field of participatory research (and how we ought to be more 'present' aware of our experience within it) – I’m intrigued by different approaches to create dynamics of increased capacity that translate from what I described in earlier talks as ARF (Arena Ratio Fields) or axials of experience that could be related (maybe) into a geometric framework.

Interpreting the observation of a viewing organism; new thinking considers the linguistic coding of the experience as shifts of view in perspective that can be represented quite simply as vector spaces (see my writing on Metasphere) and alternates that affect perspective (see my BIDECK writing) that thus become consciously led or induced into experiential coordinated systems.

That is my wild take on not knowing anything about what I am conjecturing!

I approached some of this thinking (perhaps very unconsciously) in my WeltSchloss.com writing (world built dwelling experiences) that may in some cultures, have an orientation calqued on human orientation and cognitive alternation within one’s experience (and gain insight into what is sensed, revealed or hinted at interpreting) in recognition of spatial dynamics may potentially offer and the impact effect upon our thinking or orientation of experience itself within spatial contexts.

There is much to explore, and it corresponds to the potential opportunity I have to work with (seems to be) a remarkable conscious collective of (human experience and social space) field researchers whom I would love to collaborate with and in a higher dimension open up (even if just for ourselves) this dimension of spacial relationship consideration.

Enjoy.

Checkout GrandTourIdeas.com for an earlier presupposed iterations (;

Download citation
Copy link
This is an interesting talk (episode) for myself delving into a topic I know nothing about. I say so in part jest, at least from not having studied anything about what spatial thinking scientifically is or what 'geo' graphic conscious affective perspectives are (if they exist) and what those supposed areas of understanding imply so, I have to imagine how they may contribute towards my work. However, from conjecture of a future research perspective I would love to explore and engage in it – just from spurious conjecture of what I guestimate the importance and implications of ‘it’ may be… Following up from the previous (just uploaded episode prior to this one) talk about the CARES model of community engagement in the field of participatory research (and how we ought to be more 'present' aware of our experience within it) – I’m intrigued by different approaches to create dynamics of increased capacity that translate from what I described in earlier talks as ARF (Arena Ratio Fields) or axials of experience that could be related (maybe) into a geometric framework. Interpreting the observation of a viewing organism; new thinking considers the linguistic coding of the experience as shifts of view in perspective that can be represented quite simply as vector spaces (see my writing on Metasphere ) and alternates that affect perspective (see my BIDECK writing) that thus become consciously led or induced into experiential coordinated systems. That is my wild take on not knowing anything about what I am conjecturing! I approached some of this thinking (perhaps very unconsciously) in my WeltSchloss.com writing (world built dwelling experiences) that may in some cultures, have an orientation calqued on human orientation and cognitive alternation within one’s experience (and gain insight into what is sensed, revealed or hinted at interpreting) in recognition of spatial dynamics may potentially offer and the impact effect upon our thinking or orientation of experience itself within spatial contexts. There is much to explore, and it corresponds to the potential opportunity I have to work with (seems to be) a remarkable conscious collective of (human experience and social space) field researchers whom I would love to collaborate with and in a higher dimension open up (even if just for ourselves) this dimension of spacial relationship consideration. Enjoy. Checkout GrandTourIdeas.com for an earlier presupposed iterations (; Download citation Copy link read more read less

about 1 month ago #experience, #geometrics, #grandtourideas.com, #metaspshere, #relationship, #spacial, #spacialme, #weltschloss