I agree with Tyson...new territory...but In -N - Ouch is not concerned about rights
Tyson
2 years ago
Peter, I assume that was addressed to me? The main argument, I think, is that it potentially puts employees into a confrontational situation.
Neighbor on Nicholl
2 years ago
Solil Ho wrote a great opinion piece this afternoon, and I found out even more offensive things about the company. Spoiler alert: it includes the phrase "training an “army” to conduct “spiritual warfare” against demonic entities."
Peter Fostiak
2 years ago
Such as?
Tyson
2 years ago
As I wrote below, there are honest arguments which can be made against restaurants checking vaccine status. In-N-Out's ugly, stupid statement was the opposite of anything resembling good faith.
Tyson
2 years ago
But In-N-Out went all in with their fatuous, faux-civil rights argument. All that was missing was a reference to Hitler, though I think it's there if you read between the lines. To me, that's worse than a business just admitting they're not following the rules because of the bottom line.
Tyson
2 years ago
I think there are legitimate, good faith arguments against requiring restaurants to check vaccine status. We're in new territory and this is different (and potentially more fraught) than checking someone's ID at a bar. And I say this as someone who has yet to meet a vaccine mandate I'm not in favor of.
Philip Rosenthal
2 years ago
Not hard...just ask...Nation's does and it is fast food