Contacts
Info
Trump on Trial is a podcast that covers the legal issues facing former President Donald Trump. Each week, we break down the latest news and developments in his ongoing trials...
show more
Trump on Trial is a podcast that covers the legal issues facing former President Donald Trump. Each week, we break down the latest news and developments in his ongoing trials and investigations, and we talk to experts to get their insights and analysis.We're committed to providing our listeners with accurate and up-to-date information, and we're not afraid to ask tough questions. We'll be taking a close look at all of the legal cases against Trump, including the Georgia investigation into his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, the New York lawsuit alleging financial fraud, and the various criminal investigations into his businesses and associates.We'll also be discussing the implications of Trump's legal troubles for his political future and for the future of the country. We're living in a time of unprecedented political polarization, and Trump's trials are sure to be a major news story for months to come.Trump on Trial is the essential podcast for anyone who wants to stay informed about the legal challenges facing Donald Trump. Subscribe today and never miss an episode!
show less
Transcribed
13 JAN 2025 · Here's the script:
It's been a tumultuous few days for President-elect Donald Trump. On Thursday evening, the Supreme Court cleared the way for Trump's criminal sentencing to proceed in his New York hush money case. Trump had urged the court to halt the sentencing, arguing that as president-elect, he is entitled to immunity from criminal proceedings. However, the justices rejected his plea in a brief unsigned order.
The case revolves around Trump's conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels. The trial judge, Juan Merchan, has indicated that he does not intend to sentence Trump to jail time and is allowing Trump to appear by video at the sentencing hearing.
Trump's request to block the sentencing was denied by a 5-4 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining the court's three liberal justices in voting to allow the sentencing to proceed. Four conservative justices - Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh - indicated that they would have granted Trump's request.
The Supreme Court's decision came after a New York appeals court judge also rejected Trump's request to block the sentencing. Trump had argued that requiring him to prepare for a criminal sentencing while preparing to take office as president imposes an intolerable and unconstitutional burden on him.
However, New York prosecutors countered that Trump's suggestion that he should not be sentenced because he is the president-elect is baseless. They added that the evidence of Trump's guilt was overwhelming and that a jury would have found him guilty even without the evidence that he now claims was based on his official acts as president.
The Supreme Court's order noted that Trump's complaints regarding the use of evidence of his allegedly official acts could be addressed on appeal. It also stated that the burden that sentencing will impose on the president-elect's responsibilities is relatively insubstantial in light of the trial court's stated intent to impose a sentence of unconditional discharge after a brief virtual hearing.
The drama surrounding Trump's sentencing has also raised questions about the impartiality of Justice Samuel Alito. It was reported that Trump spoke with Alito about one of Alito's former law clerks, William Levi, who is seeking a job in the new administration. Alito maintained that he had not discussed Trump's request or any other Supreme Court cases with Trump. However, Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, called on Alito to recuse himself, citing the need for impartial justice under the Constitution.
Transcribed
12 JAN 2025 · Here's a narrative script based on the recent court trials involving Donald Trump:
Just days before his inauguration, President-elect Donald Trump faced a historic moment in court. On January 10, 2025, Trump was sentenced in the New York "hush money" case, a trial that has captivated the nation. Trump, who was found guilty in May of 34 felonies for authorizing a scheme to falsify records in 2017, appeared virtually from his Mar-a-Lago home.
The case revolves around a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels, made by Trump's former lawyer and "fixer" Michael Cohen, in exchange for her silence about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump years earlier. Multiple witnesses testified that Trump was pleased voters did not learn of Daniels' story before the 2016 election.
Despite Trump's lawyers battling Manhattan prosecutors at every turn, including multiple appeals to the Supreme Court, Justice Juan Merchan indicated he was inclined to give Trump an unconditional discharge. This sentence includes neither jail time nor any other restriction that might impede Trump after his inauguration on January 20.
In the sentencing hearing, Merchan noted the unique circumstances of the trial and its powerful defendant. Trump was given the opportunity to speak but chose not to. Merchan, who had held Trump in contempt 10 times during the trial for violating a gag order, emphasized the importance of preserving the jury's verdict and proclaiming a final sentence just 10 days before Trump's inauguration.
Trump, however, vowed to appeal the decision, aiming to potentially get the conviction off his record. This move comes as no surprise, given Trump's history of challenging legal proceedings. The appeal could potentially involve the Supreme Court, indicating that this will not be the last development in the Manhattan case.
Meanwhile, another legal case looms for Trump. A federal appeals court in Atlanta recently allowed Special Counsel Jack Smith to release a report on Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Attorney General Merrick Garland has indicated that only one volume of the special report will be released, focusing on the January 6 attacks and Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Trump is looking to get the Supreme Court involved in this case as well, setting the stage for further legal battles in the days to come.
Transcribed
10 JAN 2025 · It's January 10, 2025, and the legal landscape is abuzz with the latest developments in the court trials involving Donald Trump. Just a few days ago, on January 3, 2025, a New York trial court denied Trump's motion to dismiss a criminal case based on claims of Presidential immunity. This decision was met with swift action from Trump's legal team, who promptly filed an interlocutory appeal and notified the trial court that it is subject to an automatic stay.
However, the New York courts have refused to honor this stay, leading Trump's lawyers to seek intervention from the Supreme Court of the United States. In a recent application to the Supreme Court, Trump's legal team argued that the New York trial court lacks authority to impose sentence and judgment on him—or conduct any further criminal proceedings—until the resolution of his underlying appeal raising substantial claims of Presidential immunity.
The application highlights the urgency of the situation, noting that the trial court has set the case for criminal sentencing on January 10, 2025, just ten days before Trump's inauguration as the 47th President of the United States. Trump's lawyers contend that the doctrine of sitting-President immunity shields him from criminal process during the brief but crucial period of Presidential transition.
This legal battle is not just about Trump's personal fate but also about the broader implications for the institution of the Presidency and the operations of the federal government. Trump's team argues that the commencement of his interlocutory appeal causes an automatic stay of proceedings in the trial court under recent case law, including Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024).
As the Supreme Court considers this application, the nation waits with bated breath for a decision that could have far-reaching consequences. Will the Court intervene to prevent what Trump's lawyers describe as a "grave injustice and harm" to the Presidency and the federal government? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the legal drama surrounding Donald Trump is far from over.
Transcribed
8 JAN 2025 · As we step into the new year, the legal landscape continues to unfold with significant developments in the court trials involving Donald Trump. Just a few days ago, on January 3, 2025, a crucial decision was made in the case of People v. Donald J. Trump.
In this case, Donald Trump had requested an adjournment of sentencing until after the 2024 Presidential election. Notably, the prosecution did not oppose this request. The court's decision to grant this adjournment reflects the complex interplay between legal proceedings and political timelines[2].
This development underscores the ongoing legal challenges faced by the former President. The adjournment request and its approval highlight the strategic considerations at play in high-profile cases, where legal strategies often intersect with political and public perceptions.
The specifics of the case, as outlined in the court's decision, provide a glimpse into the legal maneuvering that characterizes such high-stakes proceedings. The decision to postpone sentencing until after the election suggests a careful balancing act, aiming to ensure that legal processes do not unduly influence or become entangled with electoral outcomes.
As we look ahead, it's clear that the legal journey of Donald Trump will continue to be a focal point of public interest and scrutiny. The recent decision in People v. Donald J. Trump serves as a reminder of the intricate and often contentious nature of legal proceedings involving public figures.
In the coming days and weeks, we can expect further developments in this and potentially other cases involving the former President. The legal system's ability to navigate these complex cases, while maintaining the integrity and impartiality of the judicial process, will be closely watched by the public and legal observers alike.
For now, the adjournment in People v. Donald J. Trump stands as a significant marker in the ongoing legal saga surrounding the former President, a testament to the enduring importance of legal accountability and the rule of law.
Transcribed
6 JAN 2025 · As we kick off the new year, the legal landscape is heating up with a significant development involving none other than Donald Trump. Just a few days ago, on January 3, 2025, a critical decision was made in the hush money trial of the former President.
New York Judge Juan Merchan upheld Trump's conviction, a move that has sparked intense debate and scrutiny. However, in a surprising twist, Judge Merchan mandated that the sentence, scheduled for January 10, will not include jail time. This decision has left many wondering about the implications and what it means for Trump's future[2][4].
The trial has been a long and arduous process, with Trump initially requesting an adjournment of sentencing until after the 2024 Presidential election. The prosecution did not oppose this request, leading to a delay that has now come to an end[4].
Legal analysts and political pundits are dissecting the decision, trying to understand the legal and political ramifications. CNN's Kara Scannell provided a detailed recap of Judge Merchan's decision, while CNN's Paula Reid delved deeper into the judge's filing. Discussions with experts like former federal prosecutor Alyse Adamson and CNN legal analyst Jennifer Rodgers have shed light on the intricacies of the decision and its potential impact on Trump[2].
The political side of the story is also being closely examined. Former Democratic Rep. Mondaire Jones and CNN political analyst Scott Jennings have weighed in on the implications for Trump's political career and the broader political landscape[2].
As we move forward, all eyes are on January 10, when Trump is set to be sentenced. The world will be watching to see how this chapter unfolds and what it means for the future of Donald Trump. With the legal and political stakes high, this is a story that will continue to captivate and intrigue us in the days to come.
Transcribed
5 JAN 2025 · As we step into the new year, 2025, the legal landscape continues to be shaped by high-profile cases, none more so than those involving Donald Trump. Just a couple of days ago, on January 3, 2025, a significant development occurred in one of these trials.
In the case of People v. Donald J. Trump, a decision and order were issued by the court. The defendant, Donald Trump, had requested an adjournment of sentencing until after the 2024 Presidential election. Notably, the prosecution did not oppose this request. This adjournment highlights the complex interplay between legal proceedings and political timelines, underscoring the challenges of navigating high-stakes cases involving public figures.
The specifics of this case are not publicly detailed in the available documents, but the decision to grant the adjournment until after the election suggests a careful consideration of the potential impact on the electoral process. This move is indicative of the judiciary's role in ensuring that legal proceedings do not unduly influence political outcomes.
The broader context of this case is part of a larger narrative involving Donald Trump's legal challenges. While the details of this particular case are not fully disclosed, it is clear that the legal system is grappling with the implications of prosecuting a figure who has been at the center of American politics.
In conclusion, the recent developments in the case of People v. Donald J. Trump serve as a reminder of the intricate relationship between law and politics. As we move forward in 2025, it will be crucial to monitor how these dynamics continue to unfold, especially in cases involving high-profile individuals like Donald Trump. The legal system's ability to navigate these complexities will be under close scrutiny, and the outcomes will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications.
Transcribed
3 JAN 2025 · As we step into 2025, the legal landscape for former President Donald Trump remains as complex and contentious as ever. Just a few days ago, on the cusp of the New Year, constitutional law expert Harold Krent, a professor at the Chicago-Kent College of Law, delved into the upcoming cases at the Supreme Court, including those involving Trump[3].
One of the most recent and intriguing developments is Trump's intervention in the TikTok case. Trump, now President-elect, has asked the Supreme Court to stay the law requiring TikTok to divest from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, by January 19th. This move is unprecedented, as it raises a presidential power issue under Article 2 that has never been discussed in court before. Trump's lawyer argues that his prerogatives as a future President should be preserved, suggesting that his deal-making expertise and electoral mandate could negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing national security concerns[3].
This case is particularly interesting because it opens a new can of worms regarding the powers of a President-elect. The Supreme Court's decision on whether to stay the case or not will have a significant impact on Trump's presidency and could set a new precedent.
Meanwhile, Trump's legal calendar is filled with other critical dates. In the DC Election Interference case, Trump has been battling various motions and deadlines. For instance, on October 3, 2024, Trump was due to submit a supplement to his motion to dismiss based on statutory grounds, and on October 10, 2024, he had to file objections to the proposed redactions in the government's motion for "Immunity Determinations"[1].
In Georgia, Mark Meadows, Trump's former chief of staff, has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari following the 11th Circuit's decision to dismiss his bid to move his state criminal case to federal court. This case is part of a broader legal battle involving Trump and his associates[1].
In New York, Trump faces civil and criminal cases, including the election interference case where Justice Merchan is set to issue a decision on Trump's motion to set aside the jury's guilty verdicts based on the U.S. Supreme Court's Presidential Immunity decision[1][3].
As these cases unfold, the legal community is watching closely, anticipating how these decisions will shape the future of presidential immunity and the powers of a President-elect. With the Supreme Court set to rule on the TikTok case before the January 19th deadline, the next few weeks will be crucial in determining the trajectory of Trump's legal battles.
Transcribed
1 JAN 2025 · As we step into the new year, 2025, the legal landscape surrounding former President Donald Trump continues to unfold with significant developments. Over the past few days, several key court dates have marked crucial milestones in Trump's ongoing legal battles.
On December 5, 2024, oral arguments were heard at the Georgia Court of Appeals regarding Trump's appeal from Judge McAfee's order declining to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis. This case is part of the broader legal challenges Trump faces in Georgia, where he is under investigation for alleged election interference.
Meanwhile, in the District of Columbia, Trump's legal team has been engaged in a series of filings related to the election interference case. On October 31, 2024, the government was due to file its opposition to Trump's request for leave to file a motion to dismiss based on the Appointments and Appropriations Clauses. This was followed by Trump's reply brief in support of his request, which was due on November 7, 2024.
In another significant development, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has been hearing the government's appeal from Judge Cannon's order dismissing the indictment against Trump based on the alleged unlawful appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. Amicus curiae briefs in support of Trump were due on November 1, 2024, and the government's reply brief was due on November 15, 2024.
Additionally, in New York, Justice Merchan was scheduled to issue a decision on Trump's motion to set aside the jury's guilty verdicts based on the U.S. Supreme Court's Presidential Immunity decision on November 12, 2024.
As these legal battles continue to unfold, it is clear that the coming year will be pivotal for Trump's legal fortunes. With multiple cases spanning various jurisdictions, the former President's legal team will be busy navigating these complex legal challenges.
In the midst of these legal proceedings, it is worth noting that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Trump's presidential immunity appeal has had a ripple effect on several of these cases. The Court's judgment vacating the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals judgment and remanding the case to the D.C. Circuit has set the stage for further legal battles.
As we look ahead to 2025, the legal saga involving Donald Trump promises to be as dramatic and unpredictable as ever. With each new development, the stakes grow higher, and the nation watches with bated breath.
Transcribed
30 DEC 2024 · It's been a tumultuous few weeks for Donald Trump as his legal battles continue to unfold. Just days ago, on December 3, Trump's lawyers formally asked Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan to throw out his hush money criminal conviction. The defense argued that continuing the case would present unconstitutional disruptions to the institution of the presidency, given Trump's impending return to the White House[2].
This move comes after Trump's election victory last month, which has significantly altered the landscape of his ongoing legal challenges. Judge Merchan has halted proceedings and indefinitely postponed Trump's sentencing, previously scheduled for late November, to allow both sides to weigh in on the future of the case. Prosecutors have indicated they will fight any efforts to dismiss the case but are open to delaying sentencing until after Trump's second term ends in 2029.
Meanwhile, the DC Election Interference case has seen a flurry of activity. Trump's legal team has been busy filing motions and responses, including a supplement to his motion to dismiss based on statutory grounds, which was due on October 3. The government's response to this supplement was due on October 17, the same day Trump had to file his response to the government's opening brief on Presidential Immunity and his renewed motion to dismiss based on Presidential Immunity[1].
The case has been remanded to the District Court after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Trump's presidential immunity appeal. The District Court must now determine whether Trump's conduct qualifies as official or unofficial, a fact-specific analysis that could have significant implications for the case[4].
In another development, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals is set to hear the government's appeal from Judge Cannon's order dismissing the indictment in Trump's classified documents case. Trump's appellee brief was due on October 25, and amicus curiae briefs in support of Trump were due on November 1[1].
As the year draws to a close, Trump's legal calendar remains packed. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining the fate of these cases, which could have far-reaching consequences for Trump's presidency and beyond. With Judge Merchan's decision on the hush money conviction pending and the DC Election Interference case moving forward, the legal battles surrounding Donald Trump are far from over.
Transcribed
29 DEC 2024 · As we near the end of 2024, the legal landscape for Donald Trump remains complex and multifaceted. Over the past few months, Trump has been juggling multiple court cases, each with its own set of deadlines and challenges.
In the DC Election Interference case, Trump has been actively filing motions and responses. On October 3, he submitted a supplement to his motion to dismiss based on statutory grounds. This was followed by a series of filings, including his response to the government's opening brief on Presidential Immunity and his renewed motion to dismiss based on Presidential Immunity, both due on October 17. The government responded to Trump's supplement on the same day, and the legal back-and-forth continued with Trump requesting leave to file a motion to dismiss based on the Appointments and Appropriations Clauses by October 24[1].
Meanwhile, in Georgia, Mark Meadows, a former Trump aide, has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari following the 11th Circuit's decision to dismiss his bid to move his state criminal case to federal court. The District Attorney, Fani Willis, responded to Meadows' petition on October 3, highlighting the ongoing legal battles in Georgia[1].
In another significant case, Trump's classified documents case in Florida took a turn when Judge Cannon granted Trump's motion to dismiss the superseding indictment based on the alleged unlawful appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The government appealed this decision to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, with briefing schedules now set. Trump's appellee brief was due on October 25, and amicus curiae briefs in support of Trump were due on November 1[1].
As Trump prepares to return to the White House in January, these legal cases continue to cast a shadow over his political future. The outcomes of these cases will be crucial in determining Trump's legal standing and potential implications for his presidency[5].
In the midst of these legal battles, Trump's appeal in the New York civil fraud case is also underway. The defendants have filed appeals against Justice Engoron's September 2023 summary judgment and his February 2024 final decision, adding another layer of complexity to Trump's legal landscape[1].
As we look back on the past few months, it's clear that Trump's legal challenges are far from over. With multiple cases ongoing and new appeals emerging, the coming months will be critical in shaping Trump's legal and political future.
Trump on Trial is a podcast that covers the legal issues facing former President Donald Trump. Each week, we break down the latest news and developments in his ongoing trials...
show more
Trump on Trial is a podcast that covers the legal issues facing former President Donald Trump. Each week, we break down the latest news and developments in his ongoing trials and investigations, and we talk to experts to get their insights and analysis.We're committed to providing our listeners with accurate and up-to-date information, and we're not afraid to ask tough questions. We'll be taking a close look at all of the legal cases against Trump, including the Georgia investigation into his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, the New York lawsuit alleging financial fraud, and the various criminal investigations into his businesses and associates.We'll also be discussing the implications of Trump's legal troubles for his political future and for the future of the country. We're living in a time of unprecedented political polarization, and Trump's trials are sure to be a major news story for months to come.Trump on Trial is the essential podcast for anyone who wants to stay informed about the legal challenges facing Donald Trump. Subscribe today and never miss an episode!
show less
Information
| Author | QP-1 |
| Organization | William Corbin |
| Categories | Politics , Animation & Manga , News |
| Website | - |
| corboo@mac.com |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
