It sounds as if many of the questions asked are not answered directly or are addressed disingenuously. To suggest the majority of "the community" is in support of the preservation of the pink house needs further clarification and support. Facebook responses, for one example, clearly indicate the opposite is true. The specifics of the PRWR report are not addressed honestly. For instance, the report notes the basement floods with every high tide. The report notes there is asbestos and other contaminants that will leak into the environment from the house. The report also clearly suggests the area behind and around the house is a wildlife management zone. An alternative viewpoint is needed for fair representation on the issue. Also, there's no indication from the PRWR the decision is under review.