There is an ongoing courtroom drama unfolding between Epic Games' Tim Sweeney and technology giant, Apple Incorporated. This battle has paved the way for more significant issues to come to light, including the stifling question about the monopolization of digital platforms.

Epic Games' CEO, Tim Sweeney, launched an all-out public and legal assault on Apple, announcing a direct payment system for its popular game, Fortnite, on iOS devices. The direct payment system bypassed Apple's App Store, which led to the immediate removal of Fortnite from the App Store. In response, Epic Games filed a lawsuit against Apple, alleging various anti-competitive practices.

Meanwhile, the United States Department of Justice released an 88-page formal complaint lambasting similar anti-competitive allegations against Apple. The document sheds light on what appear to be improper practices, casting a long shadow over the company's business conduct.

At the heart of the fight is a challenge to Apple's control over its App Store, where it collects a 30% commission from in-app purchases. Critics, including Epic Games and the Department of Justice, consider this fee excessive and indicative of monopolistic control.

The fundamental question being raised in these legal proceedings revolves around whether or not Apple's App Store constitutes a monopoly. If it is, then, as a monopoly, is Apple abusing its power to limit competition, inflict high fees, and apply restrictive rules on app developers?

The outcome of the Epic Games vs. Apple saga could profoundly change the dynamics of the technology industry and the $100 billion gaming industry. If Apple's practices are deemed illegal, this could pave the way for other tech giants being held more accountable for their business practices, affecting how digital platforms are being operated and monitored in the future.

While the implications are indeed far-reaching, industry experts say it's too soon to predict any substantial changes. Regardless of the outcome, the case is sure to be a closely watched benchmark, possibly setting precedent on dealing with digital platform monopolization.