2. Carminealso complains about reasearch based on the interpretation of blurry or non-original photos and videos. Apparently this reminds him too much of the several misguided investigations of the past. Obviously if we had sharp original images of the TSBD steps then the "research" would be trivial. The photographic investigation becomes meaningul once you can establish that the prior probabilty of Oswald being Prayerman is sufficiently high, and this is what I believe Bart has done. My impression is that most of the remaining Prayerman research involves securing a clearer original copy of the Darnell video. How can Carmine be so opposed to that?

To me Carmine's spat with Bart Kamp makes no sense. Carmine's beef with the Oswald as Prayerman hypothesis essentially boils down to his faith in the TSBD steps witnesses that they didn't notice Oswald's presence "at the time of the shooting." Firstly, to most of these witnesses Oswald was an unremarkable grunt who was invisible to them until he appeared on national TV. With the exception of Buell Frazier, who would have noticed him there? Secondly, there was a short interval of time between the last rifle report and Dave Wiegman's capturing the first faint image of Prayerman on the TSBD steps. If Oswald was near the TSBD vestibule at the time of the third shot he could have easily stepped outside to "observe the commotion" before Wiegman's arrival on foot from camera car number one. Thus Frazier's testimony could be true, technically speaking, with Oswald being Prayerman.

2. Not to mention the speculative and flimsy "evidence" he provides for his assertions. It's just a lot of anecdotal speculation with no substantive or documentary proof whatsoever. His post reads like sour grapes, or even worse, (and I DO NOT want to be mean or insulting) it reads like someone who has lost his grip do to some kind of fantastical ego-trip. I'm worried about Carmine, to be honest. To be clear, I am NOT defending Diugenio, Pease, et al, but claiming that all of these people are Disinfo/Gang Stalkers without direct proof or primary sourcing seems pretty reckless, unhelpful, and so far at least, kinda paranoid...🐵🐱

I used to have mad-respect for Carmine. His approach to JFK research really challenged some of my own precepts and kept me "honest" about my own research. After reading his latest blog post on tpaak, I see him in an entirely different light. How many times has Carmine scolded others for "unproductive infighting" on Chuck's Show?