California Corruption Melt Down

Discover

Your Library

For Creators

Your Podcasts

Start for Free

Product News

Our Platform

Settings

Light Theme

Dark Theme

Porthole to Justice

California Corruption Melt Down

Jul 18, 2017 · 1h 31m 44s

Comments

Amelia Duran

6 years ago

Being alone judges chambers gives him opportunity to steal her as his ward by meeting with the child ex parte ...with no parent of counsel...which by law should be by TWO...a parents counsel BY Law has a right to be there in the interest... this is all ex parte on purpose lets not forget it is CREEPY ...what a great place to test who the kid should be sold to. by by HIGH LAW....big L Law of Equity, in that secret meeting that adult as that estate Adminstrator is garnering what is called "parole evidence" which is what happen when you take "legal representation" as when you take counsel you are deemed imcompetent.. those "judges" are being allowed to effect construtive fraud by stealing the Lawful Executorship from the Parent/Gaurdian/Trustee even...by have a ex parte meeting with that child. That is why one never ever allows a dying person alone with anyone...as "parole evidence" is easy to fabricate when no one is around and the one with the Estate to convey DIES...and they come out and say...his last words to me were..."I love you best, you get it all"...and he just got priority claim to it all, even if there IS A WILL.....

Amelia Duran

6 years ago

http://sd13.senate.ca.gov/news/2017-07-06-effort-bar-child-marriage-california-runs-opposition

Amelia Duran

6 years ago

“I thought, that can’t be true in California,” said state Sen. Jerry Hill, a Democrat from San Mateo. “We found that it is true in California and true in many states throughout the country.” But Hill’s resulting proposal to bar juveniles from getting hitched has been watered down after it prompted strong objections from civil rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union.

Amelia Duran

6 years ago

Insert from San Fran Chronical

Amelia Duran

6 years ago

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7OcjM3afbZg

Amelia Duran

6 years ago

#PortholetoJustice An act to amend Sections 302, 303, 304, 1501, and 2210 of the Family Code, relating to marriage. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 273, as amended, Hill. Marriage: minors. Existing law authorizes an unmarried person who is under 18 years of age to marry upon obtaining a court order granting permission and the written consent of at least one of the parents or the guardian of each underage party to the marriage, as specified. Existing law requires the court, if it considers it necessary, as part of the court order granting permission to marry, to require the parties to the prospective marriage of a minor to participate in premarital counseling, as specified. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB273