<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Historical Medicine</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/historical-medicine--7317668</link><description><![CDATA[Historical medicine is a record of brilliant guesses, catastrophic certainties, and cures that killed. Doctors bled presidents to death with total confidence, and laughed at the first man who told them to wash their hands. This show tells the true stories of historical medicine.<br /><br /> Each episode reconstructs one case in full, cinematic detail: the disease as patients lived it, the treatments of the era, the physician who challenged the consensus, and the slow, bitter fight to change medical minds. No host chatting between clips, no panel debating trivia. Just one complete story, narrated start to finish, built from case notes, journals, and the archives of historical medicine.<br /><br /> You will walk hospital wards where historical medicine did more harm than the illness, follow surgeons racing the clock before anesthesia existed, and meet the stubborn few whose heresies became the foundations of modern care. Some episodes follow a single outbreak from first fever to final count; others trace a treatment's journey from miracle to malpractice. All of them treat historical medicine as what it really is: the story of humanity learning, painfully, how bodies actually work.<br /><br /> If you are drawn to historical medicine told like a slow-burning thriller, this is built for you. New episodes drop regularly, each one a self-contained case from the archives of historical medicine. Subscribe now so the next one lands the moment it goes live.]]></description><atom:link href="https://www.spreaker.com/show/7317668/episodes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language>en</language><category>History</category><copyright>Copyright OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:02:05 +0000</lastBuildDate><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:owner><itunes:name>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:name><itunes:email>creators@obomedia.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/3d0bbff304382f7323a52cddb9243d14.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Historical medicine is a record of brilliant guesses, catastrophic certainties, and cures that killed. Doctors bled presidents to death with total confidence, and laughed at the first man who told them to wash their hands. This show tells the true...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Historical medicine is a record of brilliant guesses, catastrophic certainties, and cures that killed. Doctors bled presidents to death with total confidence, and laughed at the first man who told them to wash their hands. This show tells the true stories of historical medicine.<br /><br /> Each episode reconstructs one case in full, cinematic detail: the disease as patients lived it, the treatments of the era, the physician who challenged the consensus, and the slow, bitter fight to change medical minds. No host chatting between clips, no panel debating trivia. Just one complete story, narrated start to finish, built from case notes, journals, and the archives of historical medicine.<br /><br /> You will walk hospital wards where historical medicine did more harm than the illness, follow surgeons racing the clock before anesthesia existed, and meet the stubborn few whose heresies became the foundations of modern care. Some episodes follow a single outbreak from first fever to final count; others trace a treatment's journey from miracle to malpractice. All of them treat historical medicine as what it really is: the story of humanity learning, painfully, how bodies actually work.<br /><br /> If you are drawn to historical medicine told like a slow-burning thriller, this is built for you. New episodes drop regularly, each one a self-contained case from the archives of historical medicine. Subscribe now so the next one lands the moment it goes live.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:category text="History"/><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><podcast:guid>114a5107-45fc-5e62-8f5f-95a2444f6cfb</podcast:guid><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><item><title>The Khamisiyah demolition that released sarin and shattered veterans</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-khamisiyah-demolition-that-released-sarin-and-shattered-veterans--74913779</link><description><![CDATA[A demolition at Khamisiyah sent sarin into the desert air and triggered alarms across the Gulf-how did that exposure shatter returning veterans?<br /><br />The Khamisiyah demolition that released sarin and shattered veterans<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline and evidence around the Khamisiyah demolition and the cascade of exposures - pills, vaccines, pesticides, oil-well smoke, and chemical alarms - that veterans linked to Gulf War illness. What connections did soldiers and allied detections point to, and what questions did official denials leave open?<br /><br />Person: American soldiers at Khamisiyah<br />Event: Controlled demolition of a rocket depot<br />Report: Riegle Report citing 18,000 chemical alarm events<br />Agent detections: Czech, French, and British forces detected chemical agents<br />Exposure timeline: pyridostigmine bromide pills, vaccines, pesticides, oil-well smoke<br /><br />- Soldiers set charges, moved to a safe distance, and detonated rockets at Khamisiyah as routine post-war procedure.<br />- Chemical alarms sounded 18,000 times across the Iraqi desert, a figure recorded in the Riegle Report.<br />- Czech units detected mustard gas and sarin; French and British forces confirmed chemical agents in the air.<br />- American servicemembers received medals specifically for detecting chemical agents in the field.<br />- Troops faced overlapping exposures: experimental pyridostigmine bromide pills, anthrax and botulinum vaccines, pervasive pesticides, and prolonged oil-well smoke.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913779</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913779/0053.mp3" length="14834060" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A demolition at Khamisiyah sent sarin into the desert air and triggered alarms across the Gulf-how did that exposure shatter returning veterans?&#13;
&#13;
The Khamisiyah demolition that released sarin and shattered veterans&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A demolition at Khamisiyah sent sarin into the desert air and triggered alarms across the Gulf-how did that exposure shatter returning veterans?<br /><br />The Khamisiyah demolition that released sarin and shattered veterans<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline and evidence around the Khamisiyah demolition and the cascade of exposures - pills, vaccines, pesticides, oil-well smoke, and chemical alarms - that veterans linked to Gulf War illness. What connections did soldiers and allied detections point to, and what questions did official denials leave open?<br /><br />Person: American soldiers at Khamisiyah<br />Event: Controlled demolition of a rocket depot<br />Report: Riegle Report citing 18,000 chemical alarm events<br />Agent detections: Czech, French, and British forces detected chemical agents<br />Exposure timeline: pyridostigmine bromide pills, vaccines, pesticides, oil-well smoke<br /><br />- Soldiers set charges, moved to a safe distance, and detonated rockets at Khamisiyah as routine post-war procedure.<br />- Chemical alarms sounded 18,000 times across the Iraqi desert, a figure recorded in the Riegle Report.<br />- Czech units detected mustard gas and sarin; French and British forces confirmed chemical agents in the air.<br />- American servicemembers received medals specifically for detecting chemical agents in the field.<br />- Troops faced overlapping exposures: experimental pyridostigmine bromide pills, anthrax and botulinum vaccines, pervasive pesticides, and prolonged oil-well smoke.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>928</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The APU seal leaked oil vapors that blurred the pilots' vision</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-apu-seal-leaked-oil-vapors-that-blurred-the-pilots-vision--74913778</link><description><![CDATA[A pilot on final approach to Birmingham suddenly saw double as oil vapors from the APU seal blurred the cockpit - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The APU seal leaked oil vapors that blurred the pilots' vision<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events, technical details, and institutional responses surrounding the November 5, 2000 Birmingham approach where both pilots lost the ability to judge height and vision was impaired. The episode traces bleed-air mechanics, the APU seal leak identified in the investigation, and the contested debate over contamination and health effects that followed.<br /><br />Date: November 5, 2000<br />Location: Birmingham<br />Aircraft registration: G-JEAK<br />Event: APU cooling fan seal leak into environmental control system; fume event reported<br />Topic: Bleed air contamination and disputed health effects (aerotoxic syndrome)<br /><br />- The flight descended through cloud cover with both pilots simultaneously losing clear visual judgment and one seeing double.<br />- Investigators documented an oil leak from the APU cooling fan seal into the environmental control system after the aircraft landed.<br />- The official report described only "circumstantial evidence" of contamination and found no definitive medical cause.<br />- Synthetic jet oils contain tricresyl phosphate (TCP), which decomposes under bleed-air heat into compounds crews described as acrid, heated-plastic smells linked to headaches and coordination problems.<br />- Industry studies and FAA-funded research diverged on incident frequency, citing one-in-5,000 versus one-in-22,000 flights experiencing fume events, shaping a long-running institutional dispute.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913778</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:00:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913778/0052.mp3" length="12842902" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A pilot on final approach to Birmingham suddenly saw double as oil vapors from the APU seal blurred the cockpit - how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The APU seal leaked oil vapors that blurred the pilots' vision&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we lay out the sequence...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A pilot on final approach to Birmingham suddenly saw double as oil vapors from the APU seal blurred the cockpit - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The APU seal leaked oil vapors that blurred the pilots' vision<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events, technical details, and institutional responses surrounding the November 5, 2000 Birmingham approach where both pilots lost the ability to judge height and vision was impaired. The episode traces bleed-air mechanics, the APU seal leak identified in the investigation, and the contested debate over contamination and health effects that followed.<br /><br />Date: November 5, 2000<br />Location: Birmingham<br />Aircraft registration: G-JEAK<br />Event: APU cooling fan seal leak into environmental control system; fume event reported<br />Topic: Bleed air contamination and disputed health effects (aerotoxic syndrome)<br /><br />- The flight descended through cloud cover with both pilots simultaneously losing clear visual judgment and one seeing double.<br />- Investigators documented an oil leak from the APU cooling fan seal into the environmental control system after the aircraft landed.<br />- The official report described only "circumstantial evidence" of contamination and found no definitive medical cause.<br />- Synthetic jet oils contain tricresyl phosphate (TCP), which decomposes under bleed-air heat into compounds crews described as acrid, heated-plastic smells linked to headaches and coordination problems.<br />- Industry studies and FAA-funded research diverged on incident frequency, citing one-in-5,000 versus one-in-22,000 flights experiencing fume events, shaping a long-running institutional dispute.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>803</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Unlabeled Box That Reopened the World's Smallpox Question</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-unlabeled-box-that-reopened-the-world-s-smallpox-question--74913777</link><description><![CDATA[An FDA worker in Bethesda found a box labeled "variola" - does this discovery reopen the smallpox question for global health?<br /><br />The Unlabeled Box That Reopened the World's Smallpox Question<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the discovery of glass vials labeled variola in an unused storage room on the NIH campus and trace why their presence reignited a decades-long debate over whether to keep or destroy remaining smallpox stocks. How did those vials get there, and could anything inside still be alive?<br /><br />Person: Janet Parker<br />Date: July 1, 2014<br />Location: NIH campus, Bethesda, Maryland<br />Event: Unlabeled box with vials labeled "variola" found<br />Topic: Debate over destruction versus retention of smallpox stocks<br /><br />- A worker cleaning an unused FDA storage room found a cardboard box on an open shelf containing glass vials labeled "variola."<br />- Smallpox (variola) had been declared eradicated in 1980 and by 1984 officially allowed only in two repositories: CDC in Atlanta and VECTOR in Koltsovo.<br />- The discovery prompted six days of overnight testing to determine whether the contents were still viable.<br />- Historical context: ring vaccination and the WHO eradication program reduced wild smallpox to its last known natural case in Somalia, October 1977.<br />- The 1978 Birmingham case - Janet Parker infected from a lab below her office - illustrated how even controlled research settings could allow airborne transmission.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913777</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913777/0051.mp3" length="18515862" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>An FDA worker in Bethesda found a box labeled "variola" - does this discovery reopen the smallpox question for global health?&#13;
&#13;
The Unlabeled Box That Reopened the World's Smallpox Question&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the discovery of glass vials...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[An FDA worker in Bethesda found a box labeled "variola" - does this discovery reopen the smallpox question for global health?<br /><br />The Unlabeled Box That Reopened the World's Smallpox Question<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the discovery of glass vials labeled variola in an unused storage room on the NIH campus and trace why their presence reignited a decades-long debate over whether to keep or destroy remaining smallpox stocks. How did those vials get there, and could anything inside still be alive?<br /><br />Person: Janet Parker<br />Date: July 1, 2014<br />Location: NIH campus, Bethesda, Maryland<br />Event: Unlabeled box with vials labeled "variola" found<br />Topic: Debate over destruction versus retention of smallpox stocks<br /><br />- A worker cleaning an unused FDA storage room found a cardboard box on an open shelf containing glass vials labeled "variola."<br />- Smallpox (variola) had been declared eradicated in 1980 and by 1984 officially allowed only in two repositories: CDC in Atlanta and VECTOR in Koltsovo.<br />- The discovery prompted six days of overnight testing to determine whether the contents were still viable.<br />- Historical context: ring vaccination and the WHO eradication program reduced wild smallpox to its last known natural case in Somalia, October 1977.<br />- The 1978 Birmingham case - Janet Parker infected from a lab below her office - illustrated how even controlled research settings could allow airborne transmission.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1158</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The six-hundred-and-one-day appeal chain that kept her waiting</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-six-hundred-and-one-day-appeal-chain-that-kept-her-waiting--74913776</link><description><![CDATA[A young woman in Spain waited 601 days for approved euthanasia - but should mental health allow that choice?<br /><br />The six-hundred-and-one-day appeal chain that kept her waiting<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of a medical request, the legal obstacles it encountered, and the personal history that led up to a final appointment that never happened. What did a chain of appeals across five courts and four countries do to the woman at its center?<br /><br />Person: Noelia Castillo Ramos<br />Date of birth: 14 November 2000<br />Event: Euthanasia request approved by Catalonia Guarantee and Evaluation Commission<br />Duration: 601 days of legal appeals<br />Location: Sant Pere de Ribes, Province of Barcelona<br /><br />- A unanimous medical commission in Catalonia approved Noelia’s euthanasia request in July 2024 and scheduled the procedure for August 2024.<br />- Her father and the Association of Christian Lawyers filed the first appeal, triggering a sequence of legal challenges spanning nineteen months.<br />- Courts in Spain and other jurisdictions reviewed whether her diagnoses-OCD and borderline personality disorder-impaired her capacity to consent.<br />- The Barcelona court ruled in March 2025 that her mental health diagnoses did not remove her capacity to decide, yet appeals continued.<br />- Over six hundred and one days, five separate judicial bodies processed the case while Noelia lived through chronic pain, paraplegia, and the waiting the appeals imposed.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913776</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913776/0050.mp3" length="12003222" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A young woman in Spain waited 601 days for approved euthanasia - but should mental health allow that choice?&#13;
&#13;
The six-hundred-and-one-day appeal chain that kept her waiting&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the timeline of a medical request, the legal...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A young woman in Spain waited 601 days for approved euthanasia - but should mental health allow that choice?<br /><br />The six-hundred-and-one-day appeal chain that kept her waiting<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of a medical request, the legal obstacles it encountered, and the personal history that led up to a final appointment that never happened. What did a chain of appeals across five courts and four countries do to the woman at its center?<br /><br />Person: Noelia Castillo Ramos<br />Date of birth: 14 November 2000<br />Event: Euthanasia request approved by Catalonia Guarantee and Evaluation Commission<br />Duration: 601 days of legal appeals<br />Location: Sant Pere de Ribes, Province of Barcelona<br /><br />- A unanimous medical commission in Catalonia approved Noelia’s euthanasia request in July 2024 and scheduled the procedure for August 2024.<br />- Her father and the Association of Christian Lawyers filed the first appeal, triggering a sequence of legal challenges spanning nineteen months.<br />- Courts in Spain and other jurisdictions reviewed whether her diagnoses-OCD and borderline personality disorder-impaired her capacity to consent.<br />- The Barcelona court ruled in March 2025 that her mental health diagnoses did not remove her capacity to decide, yet appeals continued.<br />- Over six hundred and one days, five separate judicial bodies processed the case while Noelia lived through chronic pain, paraplegia, and the waiting the appeals imposed.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>751</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The 1986 memorandum hid SLEP data and wasted millions of meds</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-1986-memorandum-hid-slep-data-and-wasted-millions-of-meds--74913774</link><description><![CDATA[A 1986 memorandum hides military-tested SLEP data showing most drugs stayed effective for years past their labels - who decided to keep it secret?<br /><br />The 1986 memorandum hid SLEP data and wasted millions of meds<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through how a Department of Defense study and FDA testing questioned the meaning of expiration dates and why the agencies signed a written agreement to limit who saw the results. What did the memorandum seal, and how did that choice shape what civilians and health departments were told?<br /><br />Person: Joel Davis<br />Program: Shelf Life Extension Program (SLEP)<br />Date: 1986 memorandum; mid-1980s testing<br />Finding: ~90% of >100 tested drugs effective up to 15 years past labeled expiration<br />Example: Ciprofloxacin effective 9 years beyond labeled shelf life<br /><br />- The DoD faced rising costs replacing pharmaceutical stockpiles that reached labeled expiration before use.<br />- The Department of Defense commissioned the FDA to test more than 100 prescription and OTC drugs under controlled conditions.<br />- SLEP testing found roughly ninety percent of tested drugs remained safe and effective years - sometimes over a decade - past their labeled dates.<br />- In 1986 the DoD and FDA signed a memorandum restricting public access to SLEP scientific data and sharing with other agencies, manufacturers, and public health departments.<br />- Joel Davis, the FDA’s chief of expiration-date compliance, publicly stated that most expired drugs are probably still effective, echoing SLEP’s findings.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913774</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913774/0049.mp3" length="12182527" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A 1986 memorandum hides military-tested SLEP data showing most drugs stayed effective for years past their labels - who decided to keep it secret?&#13;
&#13;
The 1986 memorandum hid SLEP data and wasted millions of meds&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we walk through how...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A 1986 memorandum hides military-tested SLEP data showing most drugs stayed effective for years past their labels - who decided to keep it secret?<br /><br />The 1986 memorandum hid SLEP data and wasted millions of meds<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through how a Department of Defense study and FDA testing questioned the meaning of expiration dates and why the agencies signed a written agreement to limit who saw the results. What did the memorandum seal, and how did that choice shape what civilians and health departments were told?<br /><br />Person: Joel Davis<br />Program: Shelf Life Extension Program (SLEP)<br />Date: 1986 memorandum; mid-1980s testing<br />Finding: ~90% of >100 tested drugs effective up to 15 years past labeled expiration<br />Example: Ciprofloxacin effective 9 years beyond labeled shelf life<br /><br />- The DoD faced rising costs replacing pharmaceutical stockpiles that reached labeled expiration before use.<br />- The Department of Defense commissioned the FDA to test more than 100 prescription and OTC drugs under controlled conditions.<br />- SLEP testing found roughly ninety percent of tested drugs remained safe and effective years - sometimes over a decade - past their labeled dates.<br />- In 1986 the DoD and FDA signed a memorandum restricting public access to SLEP scientific data and sharing with other agencies, manufacturers, and public health departments.<br />- Joel Davis, the FDA’s chief of expiration-date compliance, publicly stated that most expired drugs are probably still effective, echoing SLEP’s findings.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>762</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The dental appointment that started the search for his father</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dental-appointment-that-started-the-search-for-his-father--74913773</link><description><![CDATA[A Grammy-winning star confronts a family secret after a 1973 dental appointment and a buried trove of letters - how did that small moment expose him?<br /><br />The dental appointment that started the search for his father<br /><br />In this episode, we trace how a routine dental visit in 1973 intersected with decades of secrecy, career urgency, and finally a DNA report decades later. Listen as the story follows the people, choices, and small details that kept a paternity question alive for nearly half a century.<br /><br />Person: Walden Robert Cassotto (Bobby Darin)<br />Date: May 14, 1936 (birth); December 20, 1973 (death); April 2020 (DNA report)<br />Location: East Harlem, New York<br />Event: discovery of private letters in 1973; 1973 dental appointment<br />Topic: concealed paternity and lifelong secrecy<br /><br />- Born into a household where his grandmother presented herself as his mother and his mother lived as his older sister.<br />- Nina Cassotto became pregnant in August 1935; the family reconstructed roles to protect reputations and the child.<br />- Darin’s childhood rheumatic fever recurred multiple times, producing a lifelong belief he would not live long and accelerating his ambitions.<br />- He adopted the stage name Bobby Darin during his teens and rapidly built a hit-making career through songs like “Splish Splash,” “Dream Lover,” and “Mack the Knife.”<br />- When Darin died in 1973, investigators found preserved love letters he had kept for seventeen years-yet the man’s paternity remained unsaid until a lab report in April 2020.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913773</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:00:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913773/0048.mp3" length="15635288" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Grammy-winning star confronts a family secret after a 1973 dental appointment and a buried trove of letters - how did that small moment expose him?&#13;
&#13;
The dental appointment that started the search for his father&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we trace how a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Grammy-winning star confronts a family secret after a 1973 dental appointment and a buried trove of letters - how did that small moment expose him?<br /><br />The dental appointment that started the search for his father<br /><br />In this episode, we trace how a routine dental visit in 1973 intersected with decades of secrecy, career urgency, and finally a DNA report decades later. Listen as the story follows the people, choices, and small details that kept a paternity question alive for nearly half a century.<br /><br />Person: Walden Robert Cassotto (Bobby Darin)<br />Date: May 14, 1936 (birth); December 20, 1973 (death); April 2020 (DNA report)<br />Location: East Harlem, New York<br />Event: discovery of private letters in 1973; 1973 dental appointment<br />Topic: concealed paternity and lifelong secrecy<br /><br />- Born into a household where his grandmother presented herself as his mother and his mother lived as his older sister.<br />- Nina Cassotto became pregnant in August 1935; the family reconstructed roles to protect reputations and the child.<br />- Darin’s childhood rheumatic fever recurred multiple times, producing a lifelong belief he would not live long and accelerating his ambitions.<br />- He adopted the stage name Bobby Darin during his teens and rapidly built a hit-making career through songs like “Splish Splash,” “Dream Lover,” and “Mack the Knife.”<br />- When Darin died in 1973, investigators found preserved love letters he had kept for seventeen years-yet the man’s paternity remained unsaid until a lab report in April 2020.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>978</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Vitamin E Acetate That Turned Vape Oil Into Deadly Ketene</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-vitamin-e-acetate-that-turned-vape-oil-into-deadly-ketene--74913772</link><description><![CDATA[A Kenosha stash of mason jars links to vaping lung injuries - how did vitamin E acetate move through the illicit THC supply?<br /><br />The Vitamin E Acetate That Turned Vape Oil Into Deadly Ketene<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out how a colorless, odorless additive traveled through a fragmented illicit THC cartridge market and coincided with thousands of hospitalizations. How did the properties of vitamin E acetate and the structure of that market expose tens of thousands of cartridges to catastrophic risk?<br /><br />Person: Tyler and Jacob Huffhines<br />Location: Kenosha, Wisconsin<br />Date: September 5, 2019<br />Event: Nationwide vaping lung injury outbreak (EVALI)<br />Topic: Vitamin E acetate used as a cutting agent<br /><br />- Investigators found fifty-seven mason jars of THC oil and candy-branded packaging stacked inside a Kenosha house.<br />- Dank Vapes functioned as counterfeit, widely available cartridge packaging anyone could buy and fill.<br />- By early 2019, illicit producers began using vitamin E acetate as a primary diluent at concentrations up to 50-70%.<br />- Vitamin E acetate was visually and olfactorily indistinguishable from high-potency THC oil in cartridges.<br />- The market split-regulated nicotine products versus unregulated THC cartridges-let an invisible additive reach tens of thousands of devices.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913772</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913772/0047.mp3" length="14317880" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Kenosha stash of mason jars links to vaping lung injuries - how did vitamin E acetate move through the illicit THC supply?&#13;
&#13;
The Vitamin E Acetate That Turned Vape Oil Into Deadly Ketene&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we lay out how a colorless, odorless...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Kenosha stash of mason jars links to vaping lung injuries - how did vitamin E acetate move through the illicit THC supply?<br /><br />The Vitamin E Acetate That Turned Vape Oil Into Deadly Ketene<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out how a colorless, odorless additive traveled through a fragmented illicit THC cartridge market and coincided with thousands of hospitalizations. How did the properties of vitamin E acetate and the structure of that market expose tens of thousands of cartridges to catastrophic risk?<br /><br />Person: Tyler and Jacob Huffhines<br />Location: Kenosha, Wisconsin<br />Date: September 5, 2019<br />Event: Nationwide vaping lung injury outbreak (EVALI)<br />Topic: Vitamin E acetate used as a cutting agent<br /><br />- Investigators found fifty-seven mason jars of THC oil and candy-branded packaging stacked inside a Kenosha house.<br />- Dank Vapes functioned as counterfeit, widely available cartridge packaging anyone could buy and fill.<br />- By early 2019, illicit producers began using vitamin E acetate as a primary diluent at concentrations up to 50-70%.<br />- Vitamin E acetate was visually and olfactorily indistinguishable from high-potency THC oil in cartridges.<br />- The market split-regulated nicotine products versus unregulated THC cartridges-let an invisible additive reach tens of thousands of devices.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>895</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>When a Poisoned Loaf Nearly Killed an Empire: The Esing Mystery</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/when-a-poisoned-loaf-nearly-killed-an-empire-the-esing-mystery--74913771</link><description><![CDATA[A Chinese-owned bakery in colonial Hong Kong served arsenic-laced loaves to Europeans at breakfast - who added the poison, and why?<br /><br />When a Poisoned Loaf Nearly Killed an Empire: The Esing Mystery<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the morning of January 15, 1857, when hundreds fell violently ill after eating bread from the Esing Bakery and the seven-month crisis that followed. We trace who handled the loaves, how the colony responded, and the unanswered questions that led to a strange criminal trial.<br /><br />Date: January 15, 1857<br />Location: Hong Kong<br />Person: Cheong Ah-lum<br />Event: Mass arsenic poisoning of European breakfast loaves<br />Period: Early colonial Hong Kong, sixteen years after British possession<br /><br />- Between 300 and 500 European residents ate bread from the Esing Bakery and were violently ill by mid-morning.<br />- Chemists measured 62-64 grains of arsenic per pound in the finished loaves, a dose so large it induced vomiting before fatal absorption.<br />- Forensic review of records in 2015 found arsenic present only in baked loaves, not in flour, yeast, scraps, or bakery floor samples.<br />- Bakery owner Cheong Ah-lum fled to Macau with his family, was detained and returned; his children had also shown symptoms.<br />- The trial against those accused opened on February 2, 1857, after seven months of panic, emergency laws, and military and civilian tensions.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913771</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913771/0046.mp3" length="15814592" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Chinese-owned bakery in colonial Hong Kong served arsenic-laced loaves to Europeans at breakfast - who added the poison, and why?&#13;
&#13;
When a Poisoned Loaf Nearly Killed an Empire: The Esing Mystery&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the morning of January...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Chinese-owned bakery in colonial Hong Kong served arsenic-laced loaves to Europeans at breakfast - who added the poison, and why?<br /><br />When a Poisoned Loaf Nearly Killed an Empire: The Esing Mystery<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the morning of January 15, 1857, when hundreds fell violently ill after eating bread from the Esing Bakery and the seven-month crisis that followed. We trace who handled the loaves, how the colony responded, and the unanswered questions that led to a strange criminal trial.<br /><br />Date: January 15, 1857<br />Location: Hong Kong<br />Person: Cheong Ah-lum<br />Event: Mass arsenic poisoning of European breakfast loaves<br />Period: Early colonial Hong Kong, sixteen years after British possession<br /><br />- Between 300 and 500 European residents ate bread from the Esing Bakery and were violently ill by mid-morning.<br />- Chemists measured 62-64 grains of arsenic per pound in the finished loaves, a dose so large it induced vomiting before fatal absorption.<br />- Forensic review of records in 2015 found arsenic present only in baked loaves, not in flour, yeast, scraps, or bakery floor samples.<br />- Bakery owner Cheong Ah-lum fled to Macau with his family, was detained and returned; his children had also shown symptoms.<br />- The trial against those accused opened on February 2, 1857, after seven months of panic, emergency laws, and military and civilian tensions.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>989</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The cremation register that counted babies exposed her killings</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-cremation-register-that-counted-babies-exposed-her-killings--74913768</link><description><![CDATA[A licensed midwife in postwar Tokyo runs a maternity home where five infants are found dead-how did the cremation register expose her killings?<br /><br />The cremation register that counted babies exposed her killings<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a licensed midwife and her husband ran a central Tokyo maternity home after the war and how routine paperwork and cremation records drew investigators into a wider mystery. The episode traces the social pressures, institutional processes, and the paperwork that turned up a trail of infant deaths and ash that investigators could not ignore.<br /><br />Person: Miyuki Ishikawa<br />Person: Takeshi Ishikawa<br />Person: Dr. Shirō Nakayama<br />Date: January 12, 1948<br />Location: Kotobuki San'in, Tokyo<br /><br />- Two Waseda police officers found five infants together in one location with no signs of struggle on January 12, 1948.<br />- Kotobuki San'in was presented as a home for birth and celebration run by licensed midwife Miyuki Ishikawa and her husband Takeshi.<br />- Records show death certificates signed by Dr. Shirō Nakayama listing natural causes, filed and stamped in official channels.<br />- Investigators found seven infants alive in the home when the Ishikawas were arrested on January 15, 1948; two later died.<br />- The probe traced cremated remains and paperwork across multiple locations, revealing over forty infants’ ashes linked to the home.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913768</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913768/0045.mp3" length="13861469" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A licensed midwife in postwar Tokyo runs a maternity home where five infants are found dead-how did the cremation register expose her killings?&#13;
&#13;
The cremation register that counted babies exposed her killings&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow how a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A licensed midwife in postwar Tokyo runs a maternity home where five infants are found dead-how did the cremation register expose her killings?<br /><br />The cremation register that counted babies exposed her killings<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a licensed midwife and her husband ran a central Tokyo maternity home after the war and how routine paperwork and cremation records drew investigators into a wider mystery. The episode traces the social pressures, institutional processes, and the paperwork that turned up a trail of infant deaths and ash that investigators could not ignore.<br /><br />Person: Miyuki Ishikawa<br />Person: Takeshi Ishikawa<br />Person: Dr. Shirō Nakayama<br />Date: January 12, 1948<br />Location: Kotobuki San'in, Tokyo<br /><br />- Two Waseda police officers found five infants together in one location with no signs of struggle on January 12, 1948.<br />- Kotobuki San'in was presented as a home for birth and celebration run by licensed midwife Miyuki Ishikawa and her husband Takeshi.<br />- Records show death certificates signed by Dr. Shirō Nakayama listing natural causes, filed and stamped in official channels.<br />- Investigators found seven infants alive in the home when the Ishikawas were arrested on January 15, 1948; two later died.<br />- The probe traced cremated remains and paperwork across multiple locations, revealing over forty infants’ ashes linked to the home.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>867</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The syringe that delivered twenty‑five milligrams and killed him</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-syringe-that-delivered-twenty-five-milligrams-and-killed-him--74913763</link><description><![CDATA[A cardiologist administers 25 mg of propofol intravenously in a Los Angeles bedroom to a man who could not sleep - how did that syringe expose them?<br /><br />The syringe that delivered twenty‑five milligrams and killed him<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the sequence of events and decisions that placed a surgical anesthetic and hospital equipment in a private bedroom, and the medical, financial, and personal pressures surrounding the physician who administered it. What patterns and contradictions in the record make the situation so difficult to explain?<br /><br />Person: Conrad Robert Murray<br />Date: June 24-25, 2009<br />Location: North Carolwood Drive, Los Angeles<br />Drug: Propofol (25 mg) with benzodiazepines contributing<br />Status: Coroner ruled homicide; medical examiner: acute propofol intoxication<br /><br />- A cardiologist with no anesthesiology training set up an IV pole, saline bags and vials of propofol in a rented mansion bedroom.<br />- The patient could not sleep; the drug used was a surgical anesthetic never approved as a sleep aid and normally given with ventilator support.<br />- Murray’s background: born in Grenada, trained at Meharry Medical College, cardiology fellowship, and clinical positions on paper.<br />- By 2009 Murray faced large unpaid judgments, bankruptcy history, multiple child support obligations and a newborn, creating severe financial strain.<br />- A routine pediatric cardiology visit for Paris Jackson led to Murray becoming Michael Jackson’s exclusive personal physician and living in Jackson’s orbit.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913763</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 08:00:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913763/0044.mp3" length="15096956" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A cardiologist administers 25 mg of propofol intravenously in a Los Angeles bedroom to a man who could not sleep - how did that syringe expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The syringe that delivered twenty‑five milligrams and killed him&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we trace the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A cardiologist administers 25 mg of propofol intravenously in a Los Angeles bedroom to a man who could not sleep - how did that syringe expose them?<br /><br />The syringe that delivered twenty‑five milligrams and killed him<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the sequence of events and decisions that placed a surgical anesthetic and hospital equipment in a private bedroom, and the medical, financial, and personal pressures surrounding the physician who administered it. What patterns and contradictions in the record make the situation so difficult to explain?<br /><br />Person: Conrad Robert Murray<br />Date: June 24-25, 2009<br />Location: North Carolwood Drive, Los Angeles<br />Drug: Propofol (25 mg) with benzodiazepines contributing<br />Status: Coroner ruled homicide; medical examiner: acute propofol intoxication<br /><br />- A cardiologist with no anesthesiology training set up an IV pole, saline bags and vials of propofol in a rented mansion bedroom.<br />- The patient could not sleep; the drug used was a surgical anesthetic never approved as a sleep aid and normally given with ventilator support.<br />- Murray’s background: born in Grenada, trained at Meharry Medical College, cardiology fellowship, and clinical positions on paper.<br />- By 2009 Murray faced large unpaid judgments, bankruptcy history, multiple child support obligations and a newborn, creating severe financial strain.<br />- A routine pediatric cardiology visit for Paris Jackson led to Murray becoming Michael Jackson’s exclusive personal physician and living in Jackson’s orbit.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>944</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The government letter that summoned men and sealed their fate</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-government-letter-that-summoned-men-and-sealed-their-fate--74913762</link><description><![CDATA[A government letter in Macon County summoned Black sharecroppers into a Public Health Service study - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The government letter that summoned men and sealed their fate<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the origins and decades-long path of a Public Health Service study in Macon County, Alabama, that enrolled six hundred Black men under the promise of "treatment" and burial insurance. The episode traces the decisions, documents, and people who kept the men in the program even after a cure existed, and asks what the records show about who knew and when.<br /><br />Person: Eunice Rivers<br />Person: Raymond Vonderlehr<br />Date: 1932-1972<br />Location: Macon County, Alabama<br />Topic: USPHS syphilis study<br /><br />- A government-sealed letter offering "Last Chance for Special Free Treatment" was used to recruit men in Macon County.<br />- Taliaferro Clark designed an initial six-to-twelve-month study to observe untreated syphilis, then offer treatment, but he resigned before extensions were approved.<br />- Nurse Eunice Rivers, trained at Tuskegee Institute, remained the sole continuous staff member for forty years and built deep personal ties with participants and their families.<br />- Researchers provided free exams, meals, rides, minor care, and burial insurance to keep men enrolled while labeling ailments as vague "bad blood."<br />- In 1947, when penicillin became standard treatment for syphilis nationally, officials reviewed the evidence and chose to continue withholding it from the enrolled men.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913762</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913762/0043.mp3" length="21004391" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A government letter in Macon County summoned Black sharecroppers into a Public Health Service study - how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The government letter that summoned men and sealed their fate&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the origins and decades-long...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A government letter in Macon County summoned Black sharecroppers into a Public Health Service study - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The government letter that summoned men and sealed their fate<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the origins and decades-long path of a Public Health Service study in Macon County, Alabama, that enrolled six hundred Black men under the promise of "treatment" and burial insurance. The episode traces the decisions, documents, and people who kept the men in the program even after a cure existed, and asks what the records show about who knew and when.<br /><br />Person: Eunice Rivers<br />Person: Raymond Vonderlehr<br />Date: 1932-1972<br />Location: Macon County, Alabama<br />Topic: USPHS syphilis study<br /><br />- A government-sealed letter offering "Last Chance for Special Free Treatment" was used to recruit men in Macon County.<br />- Taliaferro Clark designed an initial six-to-twelve-month study to observe untreated syphilis, then offer treatment, but he resigned before extensions were approved.<br />- Nurse Eunice Rivers, trained at Tuskegee Institute, remained the sole continuous staff member for forty years and built deep personal ties with participants and their families.<br />- Researchers provided free exams, meals, rides, minor care, and burial insurance to keep men enrolled while labeling ailments as vague "bad blood."<br />- In 1947, when penicillin became standard treatment for syphilis nationally, officials reviewed the evidence and chose to continue withholding it from the enrolled men.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1313</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Infant Formula That Delivered Almost No Protein-and Killed Babies</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-infant-formula-that-delivered-almost-no-protein-and-killed-babies--74913760</link><description><![CDATA[A mother in Fuyang buys formula that isn't real milk; infants die - how did a food system allow this?<br /><br />The Infant Formula That Delivered Almost No Protein-and Killed Babies<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the documented record of China's food safety crisis from 2002 through 2025, centered on the 2004 Fuyang infant formula scandal and the broader failures that enabled it. What gaps between regulation and enforcement allowed adulterated food to keep appearing on shelves?<br /><br />Person: Parents and infants in Fuyang, Anhui province<br />Date: Spring 2004<br />Location: Fuyang, Anhui province; rural Anhui and national markets<br />Event: Infant formula tested at 1-6% protein against a 10% minimum<br />Status: 2,540 bags seized; 141 factories supplied the 45 formula types<br /><br />- Investigators tested 45 infant formula types sold locally and found protein content between 1% and 6%.<br />- Thirteen infants died in Fuyang city; rural estimates place additional deaths between 50 and 60.<br />- Survivors showed severe malnutrition with "big head disease": wasted bodies and enlarged heads from fluid build-up.<br />- One hundred forty-one factories supplied the 45 defective formula types, and no single producer was named responsible.<br />- The government promised compensation to families, but no documents confirm payments reached those families.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913760</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913760/0042.mp3" length="13323555" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A mother in Fuyang buys formula that isn't real milk; infants die - how did a food system allow this?&#13;
&#13;
The Infant Formula That Delivered Almost No Protein-and Killed Babies&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we lay out the documented record of China's food safety...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A mother in Fuyang buys formula that isn't real milk; infants die - how did a food system allow this?<br /><br />The Infant Formula That Delivered Almost No Protein-and Killed Babies<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the documented record of China's food safety crisis from 2002 through 2025, centered on the 2004 Fuyang infant formula scandal and the broader failures that enabled it. What gaps between regulation and enforcement allowed adulterated food to keep appearing on shelves?<br /><br />Person: Parents and infants in Fuyang, Anhui province<br />Date: Spring 2004<br />Location: Fuyang, Anhui province; rural Anhui and national markets<br />Event: Infant formula tested at 1-6% protein against a 10% minimum<br />Status: 2,540 bags seized; 141 factories supplied the 45 formula types<br /><br />- Investigators tested 45 infant formula types sold locally and found protein content between 1% and 6%.<br />- Thirteen infants died in Fuyang city; rural estimates place additional deaths between 50 and 60.<br />- Survivors showed severe malnutrition with "big head disease": wasted bodies and enlarged heads from fluid build-up.<br />- One hundred forty-one factories supplied the 45 defective formula types, and no single producer was named responsible.<br />- The government promised compensation to families, but no documents confirm payments reached those families.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>833</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The EEOC memo that declared contraception exclusion was illegal changed plans</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-eeoc-memo-that-declared-contraception-exclusion-was-illegal-changed-plans--74913759</link><description><![CDATA[A federal memo said excluding contraception was sex discrimination, forcing churches to decide whose rights mattered. How did that memo expose them?<br /><br />The EEOC memo that declared contraception exclusion was illegal changed plans<br /><br />In this episode, we trace how a single administrative opinion reframed contraceptive coverage as a civil-rights issue and set off decades of legal and policy decisions. The episode follows the regulatory, judicial, and market steps that moved contraception from exclusion to a zero cost-sharing federal mandate - and asks what questions that shift forced institutions to answer.<br /><br />Person: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission<br />Date: December 2000<br />Law: Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act<br />Event: Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co. (2001 federal court application)<br />Policy action: HHS added FDA-approved contraceptives to ACA preventive services, announced final rule January 20, 2012<br /><br />- The EEOC issued an administrative opinion in December 2000 finding that excluding prescription contraception from employer drug plans was sex discrimination.<br />- A 2001 federal judge applied that EEOC reasoning in Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co., marking the first federal court decision against contraception exclusions.<br />- Employer-based contraceptive coverage tripled after the decision, reaching roughly 90% of plans while co-payments remained common.<br />- The Institute of Medicine in 2011 recommended contraception as essential preventive care, the clinical basis HHS used to mandate coverage.<br />- HHS’s August 1, 2011 regulatory move and the January 20, 2012 final rule required zero cost-sharing for FDA-approved female contraceptives while explicitly excluding male contraception.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913759</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 08:00:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913759/0041.mp3" length="16597848" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A federal memo said excluding contraception was sex discrimination, forcing churches to decide whose rights mattered. How did that memo expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The EEOC memo that declared contraception exclusion was illegal changed plans&#13;
&#13;
In this episode,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A federal memo said excluding contraception was sex discrimination, forcing churches to decide whose rights mattered. How did that memo expose them?<br /><br />The EEOC memo that declared contraception exclusion was illegal changed plans<br /><br />In this episode, we trace how a single administrative opinion reframed contraceptive coverage as a civil-rights issue and set off decades of legal and policy decisions. The episode follows the regulatory, judicial, and market steps that moved contraception from exclusion to a zero cost-sharing federal mandate - and asks what questions that shift forced institutions to answer.<br /><br />Person: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission<br />Date: December 2000<br />Law: Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act<br />Event: Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co. (2001 federal court application)<br />Policy action: HHS added FDA-approved contraceptives to ACA preventive services, announced final rule January 20, 2012<br /><br />- The EEOC issued an administrative opinion in December 2000 finding that excluding prescription contraception from employer drug plans was sex discrimination.<br />- A 2001 federal judge applied that EEOC reasoning in Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co., marking the first federal court decision against contraception exclusions.<br />- Employer-based contraceptive coverage tripled after the decision, reaching roughly 90% of plans while co-payments remained common.<br />- The Institute of Medicine in 2011 recommended contraception as essential preventive care, the clinical basis HHS used to mandate coverage.<br />- HHS’s August 1, 2011 regulatory move and the January 20, 2012 final rule required zero cost-sharing for FDA-approved female contraceptives while explicitly excluding male contraception.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1038</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Camera That Proved Her Body Was Failing</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-camera-that-proved-her-body-was-failing--74913758</link><description><![CDATA[A Harvard doctoral student films her own collapse at home to prove ME/CFS is real, risking everything to make doctors see what words could not.<br /><br />The Camera That Proved Her Body Was Failing<br /><br />In this episode, we follow a twenty-eight-year-old Harvard doctoral student who begins recording herself when doctors dismiss her worsening symptoms. The episode traces how private footage became public evidence and asks whether a camera could change medicine’s response to ME/CFS.<br /><br />Person: Jennifer Brea<br />Age: 28<br />Institution: Harvard (doctoral student)<br />Condition: myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)<br />Partner: Omar Wasow<br /><br />- She began filming in spring 2012 from her kitchen floor to document progressive fatigue, cognitive disruption, light sensitivity, and paralysis.<br />- Doctors repeatedly told her nothing was physically wrong, framing symptoms as psychological despite consistent, specific complaints.<br />- By 2013 she had an ME/CFS diagnosis and launched a Kickstarter for a film originally titled Canary in a Coal Mine.<br />- Home footage captured both her symptoms and the strain on her marriage, documenting caregiver exhaustion and changing domestic dynamics.<br />- The recordings were shown to physicians who had been skeptical, and seeing the footage altered how some clinicians interpreted her testimony.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913758</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:47:24 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913758/0040.mp3" length="16877880" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Harvard doctoral student films her own collapse at home to prove ME/CFS is real, risking everything to make doctors see what words could not.&#13;
&#13;
The Camera That Proved Her Body Was Failing&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow a twenty-eight-year-old...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Harvard doctoral student films her own collapse at home to prove ME/CFS is real, risking everything to make doctors see what words could not.<br /><br />The Camera That Proved Her Body Was Failing<br /><br />In this episode, we follow a twenty-eight-year-old Harvard doctoral student who begins recording herself when doctors dismiss her worsening symptoms. The episode traces how private footage became public evidence and asks whether a camera could change medicine’s response to ME/CFS.<br /><br />Person: Jennifer Brea<br />Age: 28<br />Institution: Harvard (doctoral student)<br />Condition: myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)<br />Partner: Omar Wasow<br /><br />- She began filming in spring 2012 from her kitchen floor to document progressive fatigue, cognitive disruption, light sensitivity, and paralysis.<br />- Doctors repeatedly told her nothing was physically wrong, framing symptoms as psychological despite consistent, specific complaints.<br />- By 2013 she had an ME/CFS diagnosis and launched a Kickstarter for a film originally titled Canary in a Coal Mine.<br />- Home footage captured both her symptoms and the strain on her marriage, documenting caregiver exhaustion and changing domestic dynamics.<br />- The recordings were shown to physicians who had been skeptical, and seeing the footage altered how some clinicians interpreted her testimony.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1055</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The leaflet that warned donors of AIDS exposure and government denied it</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-leaflet-that-warned-donors-of-aids-exposure-and-government-denied-it--74913757</link><description><![CDATA[A government leaflet warned blood donors AIDS was "almost certainly" transmissible - two months later ministers said "no conclusive evidence." How did that gap expose them?<br /><br />The leaflet that warned donors of AIDS exposure and government denied it<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and decisions around factor VIII, the blood-product treatment for haemophilia, and the conflicting official messages in 1983. We describe who produced and imported those concentrates, what warnings existed, and why the discrepancy between documents matters.<br /><br />Date: September 1983 (leaflet)<br />Person: Kenneth Clarke<br />Topic: Factor VIII blood products<br />Event: Conflicting government statements on blood transmission of AIDS<br />Country: United Kingdom<br /><br />- The leaflet mailed to blood donors in September 1983 stated AIDS was "almost certainly" transmissible through blood products.<br />- Two months later, Kenneth Clarke told Parliament there was "no conclusive evidence" of transmission by blood products.<br />- Factor VIII batches pooled plasma from up to sixty thousand donors, magnifying contamination risk from a single infected donor.<br />- By 1979 the UK met only about 40% of its needs domestically and imported large volumes of US plasma drawn from paid-donor populations.<br />- The Bio Products Laboratory operated under Crown Immunity and its facilities were judged inadequate for the scale of production demanded.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913757</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:47:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913757/0039.mp3" length="13170582" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A government leaflet warned blood donors AIDS was "almost certainly" transmissible - two months later ministers said "no conclusive evidence." How did that gap expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The leaflet that warned donors of AIDS exposure and government denied it...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A government leaflet warned blood donors AIDS was "almost certainly" transmissible - two months later ministers said "no conclusive evidence." How did that gap expose them?<br /><br />The leaflet that warned donors of AIDS exposure and government denied it<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and decisions around factor VIII, the blood-product treatment for haemophilia, and the conflicting official messages in 1983. We describe who produced and imported those concentrates, what warnings existed, and why the discrepancy between documents matters.<br /><br />Date: September 1983 (leaflet)<br />Person: Kenneth Clarke<br />Topic: Factor VIII blood products<br />Event: Conflicting government statements on blood transmission of AIDS<br />Country: United Kingdom<br /><br />- The leaflet mailed to blood donors in September 1983 stated AIDS was "almost certainly" transmissible through blood products.<br />- Two months later, Kenneth Clarke told Parliament there was "no conclusive evidence" of transmission by blood products.<br />- Factor VIII batches pooled plasma from up to sixty thousand donors, magnifying contamination risk from a single infected donor.<br />- By 1979 the UK met only about 40% of its needs domestically and imported large volumes of US plasma drawn from paid-donor populations.<br />- The Bio Products Laboratory operated under Crown Immunity and its facilities were judged inadequate for the scale of production demanded.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>824</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The toy microscope that pulled fibers from his lip and launched a movement</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-toy-microscope-that-pulled-fibers-from-his-lip-and-launched-a-movement--74913756</link><description><![CDATA[A Pennsylvania mother peers through a toy microscope at fibers in her toddler's lip sores - could this spark a patient-led Morgellons movement?<br /><br />The toy microscope that pulled fibers from his lip and launched a movement<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a two-year-old’s lip sores and a toy microscope set one mother on a path from home investigation to national advocacy. The story traces her efforts to name the condition, build a patient registry, and press physicians and federal agencies for answers - but what did those fibers really mean?<br /><br />Person: Mary Leitao<br />Person: Edward Leitao<br />Person: Date: 2001 (onset)<br />Event: Founding of Morgellons Research Foundation (2002 informal; 2004 nonprofit)<br />Case: Reports from more than twelve thousand families across fifty states and fifteen countries<br /><br />- She examined her two-year-old’s lip sores with a toy microscope and reported seeing red, blue, black and white fibers emerging from the skin.<br />- Eight physicians, including specialists at Johns Hopkins, examined the child and found no infection, allergy, or skin abnormality.<br />- A Johns Hopkins pediatrician recommended psychiatric evaluation and raised concerns about the mother’s use of her son; an infectious disease specialist suggested Munchausen by proxy.<br />- Leitao searched online forums, connected with similar accounts, coined the term “Morgellons” from a 17th-century letter, and began collecting reports.<br />- The Morgellons Research Foundation assembled a registry, lobbied clinicians and federal health officials, and coauthored the first peer-reviewed article proposing Morgellons as a novel skin disease.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913756</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:47:16 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913756/0038.mp3" length="21022782" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Pennsylvania mother peers through a toy microscope at fibers in her toddler's lip sores - could this spark a patient-led Morgellons movement?&#13;
&#13;
The toy microscope that pulled fibers from his lip and launched a movement&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Pennsylvania mother peers through a toy microscope at fibers in her toddler's lip sores - could this spark a patient-led Morgellons movement?<br /><br />The toy microscope that pulled fibers from his lip and launched a movement<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a two-year-old’s lip sores and a toy microscope set one mother on a path from home investigation to national advocacy. The story traces her efforts to name the condition, build a patient registry, and press physicians and federal agencies for answers - but what did those fibers really mean?<br /><br />Person: Mary Leitao<br />Person: Edward Leitao<br />Person: Date: 2001 (onset)<br />Event: Founding of Morgellons Research Foundation (2002 informal; 2004 nonprofit)<br />Case: Reports from more than twelve thousand families across fifty states and fifteen countries<br /><br />- She examined her two-year-old’s lip sores with a toy microscope and reported seeing red, blue, black and white fibers emerging from the skin.<br />- Eight physicians, including specialists at Johns Hopkins, examined the child and found no infection, allergy, or skin abnormality.<br />- A Johns Hopkins pediatrician recommended psychiatric evaluation and raised concerns about the mother’s use of her son; an infectious disease specialist suggested Munchausen by proxy.<br />- Leitao searched online forums, connected with similar accounts, coined the term “Morgellons” from a 17th-century letter, and began collecting reports.<br />- The Morgellons Research Foundation assembled a registry, lobbied clinicians and federal health officials, and coauthored the first peer-reviewed article proposing Morgellons as a novel skin disease.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1314</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Laboratory Contamination That Created a Fake Human Virus</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-laboratory-contamination-that-created-a-fake-human-virus--74913755</link><description><![CDATA[A presumed human retrovirus with a human receptor is found in patient blood and prostate tumors-how did a lab-born virus expose itself as real?<br /><br />The Laboratory Contamination That Created a Fake Human Virus<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the emergence of XMRV in the scientific literature and the ripple effects it had across patient communities and institutions. The episode traces how a signal from laboratory work came to be interpreted as a human pathogen and asks how that signal propagated so widely before being questioned.<br /><br />Person: Judy Mikovits<br />Person: Robert Silverman<br />Person: Eric Klein<br />Date: 2006-2009<br />Topic: XMRV and ME/CFS<br /><br />- 2006: Researchers at the Cleveland Clinic report a previously unknown retrovirus in prostate tumor tissue named XMRV.<br />- 2009: A paper co-authored by Judy Mikovits and Robert Silverman reports XMRV in blood of a majority of chronic fatigue syndrome patients.<br />- Scientific plausibility: XMRV has a receptor in human cells (XPR1) and links to RNase L research that suggested biological vulnerability.<br />- Institutional response: The AABB convenes a task force to assess potential risk to the national blood supply and to investigate transmissibility.<br />- Later evidence: laboratories would determine the viral signal originated in cell culture work performed about a decade earlier, prompting reevaluation of prior findings.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913755</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:47:12 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913755/0037.mp3" length="15837580" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A presumed human retrovirus with a human receptor is found in patient blood and prostate tumors-how did a lab-born virus expose itself as real?&#13;
&#13;
The Laboratory Contamination That Created a Fake Human Virus&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the emergence...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A presumed human retrovirus with a human receptor is found in patient blood and prostate tumors-how did a lab-born virus expose itself as real?<br /><br />The Laboratory Contamination That Created a Fake Human Virus<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the emergence of XMRV in the scientific literature and the ripple effects it had across patient communities and institutions. The episode traces how a signal from laboratory work came to be interpreted as a human pathogen and asks how that signal propagated so widely before being questioned.<br /><br />Person: Judy Mikovits<br />Person: Robert Silverman<br />Person: Eric Klein<br />Date: 2006-2009<br />Topic: XMRV and ME/CFS<br /><br />- 2006: Researchers at the Cleveland Clinic report a previously unknown retrovirus in prostate tumor tissue named XMRV.<br />- 2009: A paper co-authored by Judy Mikovits and Robert Silverman reports XMRV in blood of a majority of chronic fatigue syndrome patients.<br />- Scientific plausibility: XMRV has a receptor in human cells (XPR1) and links to RNase L research that suggested biological vulnerability.<br />- Institutional response: The AABB convenes a task force to assess potential risk to the national blood supply and to investigate transmissibility.<br />- Later evidence: laboratories would determine the viral signal originated in cell culture work performed about a decade earlier, prompting reevaluation of prior findings.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>990</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Dose That Broke Their Minds and Ended Seventy‑Three Days</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dose-that-broke-their-minds-and-ended-seventy-three-days--74913754</link><description><![CDATA[A federal scientist ramps up LSD on incarcerated men in a Lexington ward - by midtrial huge doses produce almost no effect: how did that expose them?<br /><br />The Dose That Broke Their Minds and Ended Seventy‑Three Days<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the Addiction Research Center at the Public Health Service Hospital in Lexington, Kentucky, and the experiments run there under Dr. Harris Isbell. The episode lays out the methods, the payments offered to incarcerated volunteers, and the clinical questions driving studies that pushed drugs and people to extremes - what does that institutional setup reveal?<br /><br />Person: Harris Isbell<br />Location: Lexington, Kentucky<br />Institution: Addiction Research Center, Public Health Service Hospital<br />Period: 1945-1950s (noted studies from 1949 and 1956)<br />Topic: prolonged drug administration on incarcerated, addicted volunteers<br /><br />- Isbell ran long-term drug trials on a ward that combined voluntary patients and court-ordered incarcerated narcotics offenders.<br />- Every participant signed a one-page consent form and was labeled a volunteer but was compensated with drugs or privileges rather than money.<br />- Researchers tested methadone, barbiturates, alcohol, marijuana, and hallucinogens, publishing over a hundred peer-reviewed studies from the ARC.<br />- In one trial, five men were kept continuously intoxicated on escalating barbiturate doses for seventy-three days, then abruptly withdrawn on day seventy-four.<br />- In an LSD experiment, even four times the standard dose produced almost no observable effects as men sat watching television under observation.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913754</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:47:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913754/0036.mp3" length="13728558" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A federal scientist ramps up LSD on incarcerated men in a Lexington ward - by midtrial huge doses produce almost no effect: how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The Dose That Broke Their Minds and Ended Seventy‑Three Days&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A federal scientist ramps up LSD on incarcerated men in a Lexington ward - by midtrial huge doses produce almost no effect: how did that expose them?<br /><br />The Dose That Broke Their Minds and Ended Seventy‑Three Days<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the Addiction Research Center at the Public Health Service Hospital in Lexington, Kentucky, and the experiments run there under Dr. Harris Isbell. The episode lays out the methods, the payments offered to incarcerated volunteers, and the clinical questions driving studies that pushed drugs and people to extremes - what does that institutional setup reveal?<br /><br />Person: Harris Isbell<br />Location: Lexington, Kentucky<br />Institution: Addiction Research Center, Public Health Service Hospital<br />Period: 1945-1950s (noted studies from 1949 and 1956)<br />Topic: prolonged drug administration on incarcerated, addicted volunteers<br /><br />- Isbell ran long-term drug trials on a ward that combined voluntary patients and court-ordered incarcerated narcotics offenders.<br />- Every participant signed a one-page consent form and was labeled a volunteer but was compensated with drugs or privileges rather than money.<br />- Researchers tested methadone, barbiturates, alcohol, marijuana, and hallucinogens, publishing over a hundred peer-reviewed studies from the ARC.<br />- In one trial, five men were kept continuously intoxicated on escalating barbiturate doses for seventy-three days, then abruptly withdrawn on day seventy-four.<br />- In an LSD experiment, even four times the standard dose produced almost no observable effects as men sat watching television under observation.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>858</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The consent sheet that made manufacturers pay for silence</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-consent-sheet-that-made-manufacturers-pay-for-silence--74913753</link><description><![CDATA[A 1976 consent sheet is handed before a flu shot, forcing manufacturers to account for warnings they never delivered - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The consent sheet that made manufacturers pay for silence<br /><br />In this episode, we trace how a single two-sided sheet changed who was responsible for informing patients about vaccines, and why that shift mattered in practice. The episode follows the legal, administrative, and logistical steps that produced the modern pre-vaccination consent form and asks who the form was actually built to protect.<br /><br />Case: Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories (Fifth Circuit, 1974)<br />Document: Important Information Statement (first issued 1976)<br />Period: 1970s-1980s<br />Topic: vaccine warnings and manufacturer liability<br /><br />- A 1974 appeals court ruled manufacturers could be liable for failures to warn even when vaccines were given by third parties.<br />- Manufacturers feared that liability without control could make vaccine production economically untenable for products sold at low margins.<br />- In 1976 the government created the first Important Information Statement to travel with vaccines across institutional boundaries.<br />- By the mid-1980s there were over fifty different Important Information Statements, produced ad hoc for specific vaccines and pressures.<br />- Clinics faced practical hurdles: protocols, storage, and distributing dozens of legally required forms to patients before vaccination.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913753</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:47:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913753/0035.mp3" length="12494742" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A 1976 consent sheet is handed before a flu shot, forcing manufacturers to account for warnings they never delivered - how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The consent sheet that made manufacturers pay for silence&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we trace how a single...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A 1976 consent sheet is handed before a flu shot, forcing manufacturers to account for warnings they never delivered - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The consent sheet that made manufacturers pay for silence<br /><br />In this episode, we trace how a single two-sided sheet changed who was responsible for informing patients about vaccines, and why that shift mattered in practice. The episode follows the legal, administrative, and logistical steps that produced the modern pre-vaccination consent form and asks who the form was actually built to protect.<br /><br />Case: Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories (Fifth Circuit, 1974)<br />Document: Important Information Statement (first issued 1976)<br />Period: 1970s-1980s<br />Topic: vaccine warnings and manufacturer liability<br /><br />- A 1974 appeals court ruled manufacturers could be liable for failures to warn even when vaccines were given by third parties.<br />- Manufacturers feared that liability without control could make vaccine production economically untenable for products sold at low margins.<br />- In 1976 the government created the first Important Information Statement to travel with vaccines across institutional boundaries.<br />- By the mid-1980s there were over fifty different Important Information Statements, produced ad hoc for specific vaccines and pressures.<br />- Clinics faced practical hurdles: protocols, storage, and distributing dozens of legally required forms to patients before vaccination.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>781</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The radiation beam that slowed his metabolism made him a stage giant</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-radiation-beam-that-slowed-his-metabolism-made-him-a-stage-giant--74913752</link><description><![CDATA[A Thornaby doctor aimed a radiation beam at an eight-year-old’s pituitary gland; the treatment slowed his metabolism and remade his body.<br /><br />The radiation beam that slowed his metabolism made him a stage giant<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the medical decision in 1955 that altered an eight-year-old Richard Griffiths' physiology and the ways that change shaped his life and stage presence. We trace his childhood in Thornaby-on-Tees, the family dynamics that taught him silence and speech, and the choices that took him from a department store porter to drama school - but what did that early treatment ultimately mean for his body and career?<br /><br />Person: Richard Thomas Griffiths<br />Date: 31 July 1947 (birth); 1955 (radiation treatment)<br />Location: Thornaby-on-Tees, North Riding of Yorkshire<br />Event: Radiation aimed at pituitary gland to treat underweight condition<br />Institution: Our Lady and St Bede School; Stockton and Billingham College; Manchester Polytechnic School of Theatre<br /><br />- A doctor in Thornaby-on-Tees decided in under an hour to target an eight-year-old’s pituitary gland with radiation to address being dangerously underweight.<br />- The beam achieved its immediate goal: Richard’s weight rose, but clinicians also slowed his metabolism permanently, altering energy processing for life.<br />- Born to profoundly deaf parents, Richard acted as the household interpreter, learning silence, deliberate speech, and the expressive mechanics that informed his acting.<br />- At fifteen he left school, worked as a porter at Littlewoods, and only returned to education after a supervisor urged him to study drama.<br />- He progressed from Stockton and Billingham College to Manchester Polytechnic School of Theatre, carrying a body shaped by a childhood medical intervention onto every stage.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913752</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913752/0034.mp3" length="16279781" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Thornaby doctor aimed a radiation beam at an eight-year-old’s pituitary gland; the treatment slowed his metabolism and remade his body.&#13;
&#13;
The radiation beam that slowed his metabolism made him a stage giant&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the medical...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Thornaby doctor aimed a radiation beam at an eight-year-old’s pituitary gland; the treatment slowed his metabolism and remade his body.<br /><br />The radiation beam that slowed his metabolism made him a stage giant<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the medical decision in 1955 that altered an eight-year-old Richard Griffiths' physiology and the ways that change shaped his life and stage presence. We trace his childhood in Thornaby-on-Tees, the family dynamics that taught him silence and speech, and the choices that took him from a department store porter to drama school - but what did that early treatment ultimately mean for his body and career?<br /><br />Person: Richard Thomas Griffiths<br />Date: 31 July 1947 (birth); 1955 (radiation treatment)<br />Location: Thornaby-on-Tees, North Riding of Yorkshire<br />Event: Radiation aimed at pituitary gland to treat underweight condition<br />Institution: Our Lady and St Bede School; Stockton and Billingham College; Manchester Polytechnic School of Theatre<br /><br />- A doctor in Thornaby-on-Tees decided in under an hour to target an eight-year-old’s pituitary gland with radiation to address being dangerously underweight.<br />- The beam achieved its immediate goal: Richard’s weight rose, but clinicians also slowed his metabolism permanently, altering energy processing for life.<br />- Born to profoundly deaf parents, Richard acted as the household interpreter, learning silence, deliberate speech, and the expressive mechanics that informed his acting.<br />- At fifteen he left school, worked as a porter at Littlewoods, and only returned to education after a supervisor urged him to study drama.<br />- He progressed from Stockton and Billingham College to Manchester Polytechnic School of Theatre, carrying a body shaped by a childhood medical intervention onto every stage.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1018</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The scar on his forehead kept him working until it killed him</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-scar-on-his-forehead-kept-him-working-until-it-killed-him--74913748</link><description><![CDATA[A scarred movie star pushes through pain after routine spine surgery, bleeding seventy-five pints-how did that expose them?<br /><br />The scar on his forehead kept him working until it killed him<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the arc of Jeff Chandler’s life from catalog artist Ira Grossel to Hollywood star, and the medical crisis that consumed him. It traces the career choices, injuries, and decisions that led up to the catastrophic surgery and the questions that remained afterward.<br /><br />Person: Jeff Chandler (born Ira Grossel)<br />Event: Routine disc surgery and subsequent bleeding<br />Amount: Seventy-five pints of blood<br />Date: 1945-1950s (career timeline through Broken Arrow)<br />Outcome: Civil malpractice finding; no charges filed<br /><br />- He began as Ira Grossel, drawing catalog illustrations for eighteen dollars a week before training at the Feagin School of Dramatic Art.<br />- He spent four years as an Army lieutenant in the Aleutian Islands, returned with $3,000, and moved to Los Angeles for acting.<br />- A car crash on the way to his first camera test left a forehead scar he carried through his career.<br />- He rose via radio roles, a Universal seven-year contract, and an Oscar nomination for playing Cochise in Broken Arrow.<br />- After routine spine surgery he bled seventy-five pints over thirty-five days, leading to a malpractice finding and a settlement without admissions of guilt.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913748</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913748/0033.mp3" length="14604182" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A scarred movie star pushes through pain after routine spine surgery, bleeding seventy-five pints-how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The scar on his forehead kept him working until it killed him&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the arc of Jeff Chandler’s life...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A scarred movie star pushes through pain after routine spine surgery, bleeding seventy-five pints-how did that expose them?<br /><br />The scar on his forehead kept him working until it killed him<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the arc of Jeff Chandler’s life from catalog artist Ira Grossel to Hollywood star, and the medical crisis that consumed him. It traces the career choices, injuries, and decisions that led up to the catastrophic surgery and the questions that remained afterward.<br /><br />Person: Jeff Chandler (born Ira Grossel)<br />Event: Routine disc surgery and subsequent bleeding<br />Amount: Seventy-five pints of blood<br />Date: 1945-1950s (career timeline through Broken Arrow)<br />Outcome: Civil malpractice finding; no charges filed<br /><br />- He began as Ira Grossel, drawing catalog illustrations for eighteen dollars a week before training at the Feagin School of Dramatic Art.<br />- He spent four years as an Army lieutenant in the Aleutian Islands, returned with $3,000, and moved to Los Angeles for acting.<br />- A car crash on the way to his first camera test left a forehead scar he carried through his career.<br />- He rose via radio roles, a Universal seven-year contract, and an Oscar nomination for playing Cochise in Broken Arrow.<br />- After routine spine surgery he bled seventy-five pints over thirty-five days, leading to a malpractice finding and a settlement without admissions of guilt.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>913</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The apprentice grabbed twelve pounds of arsenic and killed twenty</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-apprentice-grabbed-twelve-pounds-of-arsenic-and-killed-twenty--74913742</link><description><![CDATA[An apprentice in Shipley grabbed arsenic instead of gypsum, sending sweets from Bradford’s Greenmarket into deadly circulation. How did that mistake expose them?<br /><br />The apprentice grabbed twelve pounds of arsenic and killed twenty<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the chain of ordinary choices and small failures that turned a confectionery supply into a public health catastrophe. The story traces who handled the powder, how it moved from a Shipley druggist to a Bradford sweetmaker and market stall, and asks how a routine habit of adulteration made such a mistake possible.<br /><br />Person: William Goddard<br />Person: Charles Hodgson<br />Person: Joseph Neal<br />Date: 29-30 October 1858<br />Location: Bradford Greenmarket / Shipley<br /><br />- A druggist in Shipley stored unlabelled barrels of powdered gypsum and arsenic trioxide side by side in an attic.<br />- A new apprentice, weeks into his job, fetched twelve pounds from the attic in poor light; the identifying label lay face-down on the floor.<br />- The powder was bought by a lodger for a sweetmaker who used gypsum (“daft”) routinely to stretch sugar for peppermint humbugs.<br />- The experienced sweetmaker and his assistant noticed the lozenges ran too freely, looked darker, and both became violently ill during production yet completed the batch.<br />- A penny bag held roughly eleven grains of arsenic-about twice a lethal adult dose-and the sweets were sold across the Greenmarket that afternoon.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913742</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:52 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913742/0032.mp3" length="14540235" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>An apprentice in Shipley grabbed arsenic instead of gypsum, sending sweets from Bradford’s Greenmarket into deadly circulation. How did that mistake expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The apprentice grabbed twelve pounds of arsenic and killed twenty&#13;
&#13;
In this episode,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[An apprentice in Shipley grabbed arsenic instead of gypsum, sending sweets from Bradford’s Greenmarket into deadly circulation. How did that mistake expose them?<br /><br />The apprentice grabbed twelve pounds of arsenic and killed twenty<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the chain of ordinary choices and small failures that turned a confectionery supply into a public health catastrophe. The story traces who handled the powder, how it moved from a Shipley druggist to a Bradford sweetmaker and market stall, and asks how a routine habit of adulteration made such a mistake possible.<br /><br />Person: William Goddard<br />Person: Charles Hodgson<br />Person: Joseph Neal<br />Date: 29-30 October 1858<br />Location: Bradford Greenmarket / Shipley<br /><br />- A druggist in Shipley stored unlabelled barrels of powdered gypsum and arsenic trioxide side by side in an attic.<br />- A new apprentice, weeks into his job, fetched twelve pounds from the attic in poor light; the identifying label lay face-down on the floor.<br />- The powder was bought by a lodger for a sweetmaker who used gypsum (“daft”) routinely to stretch sugar for peppermint humbugs.<br />- The experienced sweetmaker and his assistant noticed the lozenges ran too freely, looked darker, and both became violently ill during production yet completed the batch.<br />- A penny bag held roughly eleven grains of arsenic-about twice a lethal adult dose-and the sweets were sold across the Greenmarket that afternoon.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>909</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Seven Dollars That Bankrupted a Compensation Fund</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-seven-dollars-that-bankrupted-a-compensation-fund--74913738</link><description><![CDATA[A dying asbestos worker forces a government fund open when a $7 shortfall exposes corporate calculus. How did that seven dollars expose them?<br /><br />The Seven Dollars That Bankrupted a Compensation Fund<br /><br />In this episode, we hear how one man’s hospital testimony, decades of documented warnings, and company actuaries' math collided around a compensation fund for asbestos victims. The story follows the decisions, timelines, and legal battles that tried to answer who would pay - and what a tiny number revealed about that choice.<br /><br />Person: Bernie Banton<br />Date: November 2007<br />Company: James Hardie<br />Event: transfer to the Medical Research and Compensation Fund<br />Location: New South Wales, Australia<br /><br />- Bernie Banton, diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in August 2007, testified from his hospital bed as the fund became operational that February.<br />- Internal company documents calculated a shortfall at A$288 million, while later figures multiplied that gap significantly.<br />- The foundation received two asbestos subsidiaries in 2001 with a valuation that underpinned the fund’s assets and liabilities.<br />- By 2002 more than half of Dust Diseases Tribunal claims in New South Wales targeted a single corporate group tied to one product line in millions of homes.<br />- Company actuaries and a government inquiry produced competing projections of a fund described as worth A$4 billion over forty years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913738</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913738/0031.mp3" length="12310422" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A dying asbestos worker forces a government fund open when a $7 shortfall exposes corporate calculus. How did that seven dollars expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The Seven Dollars That Bankrupted a Compensation Fund&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we hear how one man’s hospital...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A dying asbestos worker forces a government fund open when a $7 shortfall exposes corporate calculus. How did that seven dollars expose them?<br /><br />The Seven Dollars That Bankrupted a Compensation Fund<br /><br />In this episode, we hear how one man’s hospital testimony, decades of documented warnings, and company actuaries' math collided around a compensation fund for asbestos victims. The story follows the decisions, timelines, and legal battles that tried to answer who would pay - and what a tiny number revealed about that choice.<br /><br />Person: Bernie Banton<br />Date: November 2007<br />Company: James Hardie<br />Event: transfer to the Medical Research and Compensation Fund<br />Location: New South Wales, Australia<br /><br />- Bernie Banton, diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in August 2007, testified from his hospital bed as the fund became operational that February.<br />- Internal company documents calculated a shortfall at A$288 million, while later figures multiplied that gap significantly.<br />- The foundation received two asbestos subsidiaries in 2001 with a valuation that underpinned the fund’s assets and liabilities.<br />- By 2002 more than half of Dust Diseases Tribunal claims in New South Wales targeted a single corporate group tied to one product line in millions of homes.<br />- Company actuaries and a government inquiry produced competing projections of a fund described as worth A$4 billion over forty years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>770</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Basement Route That Turned a Trayboy into a Killer</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-basement-route-that-turned-a-trayboy-into-a-killer--74913732</link><description><![CDATA[A kitchen worker used the basement route of a Philadelphia nursing home - bodies piled up inside the building they trusted. Who did it?<br /><br />The Basement Route That Turned a Trayboy into a Killer<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the chronology of events at the Kearsley Home and how routine shifts, access routes, and medical rulings intersected as deaths accumulated. What patterns in the records and memories of staff point to a larger failure that allowed violence to continue?<br /><br />Location: Kearsley Home, Philadelphia<br />Person: Anthony Joyner<br />Date range: October 1981-July 1983<br />Event: Six confirmed murders among multiple unexplained deaths<br />Age of victims (examples): 92, 85, 86, 89, 90, 83<br /><br />- Hired as an assistant nutritionist in October 1981, Joyner worked in the kitchen and carried trays, learning corridors and the basement route.<br />- Staff consistently described him as friendly, talkative, energetic, and affectionate toward residents, with no documented behavioral warnings.<br />- In July 1982 Joyner sexually assaulted a 69-year-old woman on the street; she later identified him and he said it informed his targeting of elderly women.<br />- Multiple residents were found with blood and genital injuries but attending physicians recorded “natural causes” or heart attack, and no autopsies were ordered.<br />- Joyner later described entering residents’ rooms via the cellar route, committing assaults, and returning to work through the same employee-access pathways.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913732</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:43 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913732/0030.mp3" length="14790592" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A kitchen worker used the basement route of a Philadelphia nursing home - bodies piled up inside the building they trusted. Who did it?&#13;
&#13;
The Basement Route That Turned a Trayboy into a Killer&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the chronology of events at...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A kitchen worker used the basement route of a Philadelphia nursing home - bodies piled up inside the building they trusted. Who did it?<br /><br />The Basement Route That Turned a Trayboy into a Killer<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the chronology of events at the Kearsley Home and how routine shifts, access routes, and medical rulings intersected as deaths accumulated. What patterns in the records and memories of staff point to a larger failure that allowed violence to continue?<br /><br />Location: Kearsley Home, Philadelphia<br />Person: Anthony Joyner<br />Date range: October 1981-July 1983<br />Event: Six confirmed murders among multiple unexplained deaths<br />Age of victims (examples): 92, 85, 86, 89, 90, 83<br /><br />- Hired as an assistant nutritionist in October 1981, Joyner worked in the kitchen and carried trays, learning corridors and the basement route.<br />- Staff consistently described him as friendly, talkative, energetic, and affectionate toward residents, with no documented behavioral warnings.<br />- In July 1982 Joyner sexually assaulted a 69-year-old woman on the street; she later identified him and he said it informed his targeting of elderly women.<br />- Multiple residents were found with blood and genital injuries but attending physicians recorded “natural causes” or heart attack, and no autopsies were ordered.<br />- Joyner later described entering residents’ rooms via the cellar route, committing assaults, and returning to work through the same employee-access pathways.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>925</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The ungloved finger he called treatment that betrayed him</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ungloved-finger-he-called-treatment-that-betrayed-him--74913727</link><description><![CDATA[A trusted team doctor at Michigan State faces public accusations that his “treatment” of athletes may have been abuse - how did that expose him?<br /><br />The ungloved finger he called treatment that betrayed him<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of Larry Nassar’s career and the moments that brought allegations into the open. We outline how a physician moved from high school trainer to national team doctor and how reports and investigations unfolded, asking who knew what and when.<br /><br />Person: Larry Nassar<br />Location: Michigan State University; Karolyi Ranch, Texas; Twistars club<br />Date: First reported concerns June 17, 2015; public reckoning September 20, 2016; courtroom moment January 2018<br />Topic: Allegations of sexual abuse framed as medical treatment<br />Period: 1978-2018 (career span and public revelations)<br /><br />- Began as a student athletic trainer in 1978 and built a decades-long clinic and academic career<br />- Served as USA Gymnastics national medical coordinator from 1996 to 2014 and team physician across Olympic cycles<br />- Used an “ungloved finger” pelvic-floor technique in exams, sometimes with parents present, framed as clinical treatment<br />- Reports and concerns reached institutions as early as 1997 and formal complaints to USA Gymnastics were filed in 2015<br />- A September 20, 2016 newspaper publication triggered a public unraveling after years of silence<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913727</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913727/0029.mp3" length="14518501" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A trusted team doctor at Michigan State faces public accusations that his “treatment” of athletes may have been abuse - how did that expose him?&#13;
&#13;
The ungloved finger he called treatment that betrayed him&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the timeline of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A trusted team doctor at Michigan State faces public accusations that his “treatment” of athletes may have been abuse - how did that expose him?<br /><br />The ungloved finger he called treatment that betrayed him<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of Larry Nassar’s career and the moments that brought allegations into the open. We outline how a physician moved from high school trainer to national team doctor and how reports and investigations unfolded, asking who knew what and when.<br /><br />Person: Larry Nassar<br />Location: Michigan State University; Karolyi Ranch, Texas; Twistars club<br />Date: First reported concerns June 17, 2015; public reckoning September 20, 2016; courtroom moment January 2018<br />Topic: Allegations of sexual abuse framed as medical treatment<br />Period: 1978-2018 (career span and public revelations)<br /><br />- Began as a student athletic trainer in 1978 and built a decades-long clinic and academic career<br />- Served as USA Gymnastics national medical coordinator from 1996 to 2014 and team physician across Olympic cycles<br />- Used an “ungloved finger” pelvic-floor technique in exams, sometimes with parents present, framed as clinical treatment<br />- Reports and concerns reached institutions as early as 1997 and formal complaints to USA Gymnastics were filed in 2015<br />- A September 20, 2016 newspaper publication triggered a public unraveling after years of silence<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>908</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The vaccine that mimicked a first dengue infection primed children to die</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-vaccine-that-mimicked-a-first-dengue-infection-primed-children-to-die--74913719</link><description><![CDATA[A dengue vaccine given to fourth-graders in school gyms may have primed children for deadly second infections - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The vaccine that mimicked a first dengue infection primed children to die<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out how a national vaccination program rolled into Philippine classrooms without confirming which children had prior dengue exposure, and how one company’s late data raised the alarm. What decisions and gaps let a vaccine that worked under certain conditions become potentially dangerous for others?<br /><br />Person: Sanofi (pharmaceutical company)<br />Date: First dose rollout April 2016; company statement November 29, 2017; meeting in Paris December 1, 2015<br />Location: Philippines (Central Luzon, Calabarzon, Metro Manila); Paris (meeting)<br />Event: National school dengue vaccination program<br />Number: 491,990 children received first dose; ~800,000 total vaccinated; ~10% at greater risk (~80,000)<br />- The President met Sanofi executives in Paris on December 1, 2015, before the Philippine rollout began.<br />- By April 2016, fourth-grade students were pulled from classrooms and given the vaccine in school gymnasiums across three densely populated regions.<br />- The program did not require or conduct pre-vaccination testing to confirm prior dengue infection in each child.<br />- Dengue’s antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) means prior infection status can make a second exposure more severe, a mechanism relevant to vaccine risk.<br />- Sanofi’s November 29, 2017 statement disclosed that the vaccine could increase severe dengue risk in dengue-naive recipients after natural infection.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913719</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:35 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913719/0028.mp3" length="14057074" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A dengue vaccine given to fourth-graders in school gyms may have primed children for deadly second infections - how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The vaccine that mimicked a first dengue infection primed children to die&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we lay out how a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A dengue vaccine given to fourth-graders in school gyms may have primed children for deadly second infections - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The vaccine that mimicked a first dengue infection primed children to die<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out how a national vaccination program rolled into Philippine classrooms without confirming which children had prior dengue exposure, and how one company’s late data raised the alarm. What decisions and gaps let a vaccine that worked under certain conditions become potentially dangerous for others?<br /><br />Person: Sanofi (pharmaceutical company)<br />Date: First dose rollout April 2016; company statement November 29, 2017; meeting in Paris December 1, 2015<br />Location: Philippines (Central Luzon, Calabarzon, Metro Manila); Paris (meeting)<br />Event: National school dengue vaccination program<br />Number: 491,990 children received first dose; ~800,000 total vaccinated; ~10% at greater risk (~80,000)<br />- The President met Sanofi executives in Paris on December 1, 2015, before the Philippine rollout began.<br />- By April 2016, fourth-grade students were pulled from classrooms and given the vaccine in school gymnasiums across three densely populated regions.<br />- The program did not require or conduct pre-vaccination testing to confirm prior dengue infection in each child.<br />- Dengue’s antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) means prior infection status can make a second exposure more severe, a mechanism relevant to vaccine risk.<br />- Sanofi’s November 29, 2017 statement disclosed that the vaccine could increase severe dengue risk in dengue-naive recipients after natural infection.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>879</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Needle Failed to Find a Vein - Ohio's Execution Halted</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-needle-failed-to-find-a-vein-ohio-s-execution-halted--74913714</link><description><![CDATA[A technician can't find a vein during an Ohio lethal injection - who holds the needle in modern death‑penalty medicine?<br /><br />The Needle Failed to Find a Vein - Ohio's Execution Halted<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the events and tensions around a September 15, 2009 execution in Ohio where a team searched for usable veins for two hours and ultimately stopped. We trace how lethal injection was designed to mirror anesthesia, the medical profession's refusal to participate, and the procedural crisis that follows-who can legally and technically place the needle?<br /><br />Person: Robert Brecheen<br />Date: September 15, 2009<br />Location: Ohio, United States<br />Topic: Lethal injection procedure and medical ethics<br />Period: Modern American capital punishment since 1976<br /><br />- Technicians attempted intravenous access for two hours with eighteen failed needle insertions.<br />- Lethal injection’s three-drug protocol was modeled on anesthesia to appear clinical and controlled.<br />- The American Medical Association and anesthesiology societies prohibit physician participation in executions.<br />- A post-ban national physician survey found many doctors nonetheless approved some or all prohibited actions.<br />- Reviews of executions found measurable anesthetic levels consistent with consciousness in 43% of tested cases.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913714</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913714/0027.mp3" length="14621319" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A technician can't find a vein during an Ohio lethal injection - who holds the needle in modern death‑penalty medicine?&#13;
&#13;
The Needle Failed to Find a Vein - Ohio's Execution Halted&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we lay out the events and tensions around a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A technician can't find a vein during an Ohio lethal injection - who holds the needle in modern death‑penalty medicine?<br /><br />The Needle Failed to Find a Vein - Ohio's Execution Halted<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the events and tensions around a September 15, 2009 execution in Ohio where a team searched for usable veins for two hours and ultimately stopped. We trace how lethal injection was designed to mirror anesthesia, the medical profession's refusal to participate, and the procedural crisis that follows-who can legally and technically place the needle?<br /><br />Person: Robert Brecheen<br />Date: September 15, 2009<br />Location: Ohio, United States<br />Topic: Lethal injection procedure and medical ethics<br />Period: Modern American capital punishment since 1976<br /><br />- Technicians attempted intravenous access for two hours with eighteen failed needle insertions.<br />- Lethal injection’s three-drug protocol was modeled on anesthesia to appear clinical and controlled.<br />- The American Medical Association and anesthesiology societies prohibit physician participation in executions.<br />- A post-ban national physician survey found many doctors nonetheless approved some or all prohibited actions.<br />- Reviews of executions found measurable anesthetic levels consistent with consciousness in 43% of tested cases.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>914</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The 1662 law that turned Black women's wombs into economic property</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-1662-law-that-turned-black-women-s-wombs-into-economic-property--74913710</link><description><![CDATA[How did a colonial Virginia law turn Black women's bodies into property - and how does that legacy still shape care in modern hospitals?<br /><br />The 1662 law that turned Black women's wombs into economic property<br /><br />In this episode, we trace how a 1662 Virginia statute and medical practices across centuries intersect with contemporary maternal-health data to shape who is heard in care. What links Partus Sequitur Ventrem to today's racial gaps in maternal mortality?<br /><br />Law: Partus Sequitur Ventrem<br />Date: 1662<br />Topic: Black maternal mortality<br />Person: Shalon Irving<br />Event: Tuskegee Syphilis Study<br /><br />- Partus Sequitur Ventrem legally declared that a child’s status followed the mother’s, making enslaved women's reproductive capacity an asset.<br />- Surgeon Nathan Bozeman operated on enslaved women for vesicovaginal fistulas, often using morphine to control patients and leaving some infertile or disabled.<br />- Surgical notes and teachings by John Marion Sims and others promoted myths that Black people feel less pain, which later entered medical education.<br />- The Tuskegee study (1932-1972) withheld information from Black men and produced lasting mistrust that affected care-seeking and prenatal visit timing.<br />- Hospital records from the 1990s onward show Black maternal death rates roughly three times white rates, with many deaths deemed preventable.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913710</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:27 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913710/0026.mp3" length="14901351" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>How did a colonial Virginia law turn Black women's bodies into property - and how does that legacy still shape care in modern hospitals?&#13;
&#13;
The 1662 law that turned Black women's wombs into economic property&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we trace how a 1662...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[How did a colonial Virginia law turn Black women's bodies into property - and how does that legacy still shape care in modern hospitals?<br /><br />The 1662 law that turned Black women's wombs into economic property<br /><br />In this episode, we trace how a 1662 Virginia statute and medical practices across centuries intersect with contemporary maternal-health data to shape who is heard in care. What links Partus Sequitur Ventrem to today's racial gaps in maternal mortality?<br /><br />Law: Partus Sequitur Ventrem<br />Date: 1662<br />Topic: Black maternal mortality<br />Person: Shalon Irving<br />Event: Tuskegee Syphilis Study<br /><br />- Partus Sequitur Ventrem legally declared that a child’s status followed the mother’s, making enslaved women's reproductive capacity an asset.<br />- Surgeon Nathan Bozeman operated on enslaved women for vesicovaginal fistulas, often using morphine to control patients and leaving some infertile or disabled.<br />- Surgical notes and teachings by John Marion Sims and others promoted myths that Black people feel less pain, which later entered medical education.<br />- The Tuskegee study (1932-1972) withheld information from Black men and produced lasting mistrust that affected care-seeking and prenatal visit timing.<br />- Hospital records from the 1990s onward show Black maternal death rates roughly three times white rates, with many deaths deemed preventable.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>932</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The video appeal that forced Broadmoor to answer for him</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-video-appeal-that-forced-broadmoor-to-answer-for-him--74913707</link><description><![CDATA[A detained Broadmoor patient demands his Mental Health Tribunal be filmed-how did that expose them?<br /><br />The video appeal that forced Broadmoor to answer for him<br /><br />In this episode, we follow Albert Laszlo Haines from a 1986 arrest to a historic 2011 public tribunal that he insisted be filmed. The episode traces decades of diagnoses, transfers, and the treatments he says were never offered, asking whether the system ever tried to help him.<br /><br />Person: Albert Laszlo Haines<br />Date: May 1986; September 2011<br />Location: Maudsley Hospital, Broadmoor Hospital, Three Bridges Unit<br />Event: Mental Health Tribunal held in open court by video<br />Diagnosis dispute: personality disorder and psychotic disorder contested<br /><br />- At age 26 Haines entered Maudsley carrying a machete and a small knife; no one was harmed and he pleaded guilty to attempted wounding.<br />- Committed to Broadmoor under the Mental Health Act in 1986, then transferred to Three Bridges in 1992 where he spent 16 years without incidents.<br />- In 2008 a staff confrontation led to solitary confinement, an episode on the roof, and his return to Broadmoor.<br />- Haines refused every Broadmoor treatment offered thereafter and disputed the diagnoses recorded by clinicians including Dr. José Romero-Urcelay.<br />- In 2009 Haines requested-and in 2011 secured-the unprecedented step of having his tribunal shown publicly by video to demand transparency.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913707</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913707/0025.mp3" length="14077972" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A detained Broadmoor patient demands his Mental Health Tribunal be filmed-how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The video appeal that forced Broadmoor to answer for him&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow Albert Laszlo Haines from a 1986 arrest to a historic 2011...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A detained Broadmoor patient demands his Mental Health Tribunal be filmed-how did that expose them?<br /><br />The video appeal that forced Broadmoor to answer for him<br /><br />In this episode, we follow Albert Laszlo Haines from a 1986 arrest to a historic 2011 public tribunal that he insisted be filmed. The episode traces decades of diagnoses, transfers, and the treatments he says were never offered, asking whether the system ever tried to help him.<br /><br />Person: Albert Laszlo Haines<br />Date: May 1986; September 2011<br />Location: Maudsley Hospital, Broadmoor Hospital, Three Bridges Unit<br />Event: Mental Health Tribunal held in open court by video<br />Diagnosis dispute: personality disorder and psychotic disorder contested<br /><br />- At age 26 Haines entered Maudsley carrying a machete and a small knife; no one was harmed and he pleaded guilty to attempted wounding.<br />- Committed to Broadmoor under the Mental Health Act in 1986, then transferred to Three Bridges in 1992 where he spent 16 years without incidents.<br />- In 2008 a staff confrontation led to solitary confinement, an episode on the roof, and his return to Broadmoor.<br />- Haines refused every Broadmoor treatment offered thereafter and disputed the diagnoses recorded by clinicians including Dr. José Romero-Urcelay.<br />- In 2009 Haines requested-and in 2011 secured-the unprecedented step of having his tribunal shown publicly by video to demand transparency.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>880</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The syringe that injected plutonium and erased consent</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-syringe-that-injected-plutonium-and-erased-consent--74913704</link><description><![CDATA[A construction worker in Oak Ridge was given radiation without consent - how did medical and government institutions enable it?<br /><br />The syringe that injected plutonium and erased consent<br /><br />In this episode we lay out the cases, institutions, dates and documents that reveal a recurring pattern of nonconsensual radiation experiments. We track who was selected, which agencies were involved, and the reasoning offered at the time - but what structural choices made this possible?<br /><br />Person: Ebb Cade<br />Date: April 10, 1945<br />Location: Oak Ridge, Tennessee<br />Topic: Plutonium injection and radiation experiments<br /><br />- Ebb Cade, a hospitalized construction worker, received 4.7 micrograms of plutonium without documentation of consent.<br />- Vertus Hardiman, age five, and nine other children were brought for "treatment" in 1927 and were severely irradiated, leaving lasting injuries and a failed liability suit.<br />- Agencies named in records include the Atomic Energy Commission, Department of Defense, United States Public Health Service, and universities such as Vanderbilt.<br />- Project Sunshine sought child bone samples to study strontium-90, with hospitals in London, Glasgow and Bristol sending tissues without informing families.<br />- Investigators later found the selected subjects were overwhelmingly poor, incarcerated, institutionalized, children, or pregnant women in public clinics.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913704</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:19 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913704/0024.mp3" length="14559043" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A construction worker in Oak Ridge was given radiation without consent - how did medical and government institutions enable it?&#13;
&#13;
The syringe that injected plutonium and erased consent&#13;
&#13;
In this episode we lay out the cases, institutions, dates and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A construction worker in Oak Ridge was given radiation without consent - how did medical and government institutions enable it?<br /><br />The syringe that injected plutonium and erased consent<br /><br />In this episode we lay out the cases, institutions, dates and documents that reveal a recurring pattern of nonconsensual radiation experiments. We track who was selected, which agencies were involved, and the reasoning offered at the time - but what structural choices made this possible?<br /><br />Person: Ebb Cade<br />Date: April 10, 1945<br />Location: Oak Ridge, Tennessee<br />Topic: Plutonium injection and radiation experiments<br /><br />- Ebb Cade, a hospitalized construction worker, received 4.7 micrograms of plutonium without documentation of consent.<br />- Vertus Hardiman, age five, and nine other children were brought for "treatment" in 1927 and were severely irradiated, leaving lasting injuries and a failed liability suit.<br />- Agencies named in records include the Atomic Energy Commission, Department of Defense, United States Public Health Service, and universities such as Vanderbilt.<br />- Project Sunshine sought child bone samples to study strontium-90, with hospitals in London, Glasgow and Bristol sending tissues without informing families.<br />- Investigators later found the selected subjects were overwhelmingly poor, incarcerated, institutionalized, children, or pregnant women in public clinics.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>910</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The sealed black box that made doctors hear disease</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sealed-black-box-that-made-doctors-hear-disease--74913702</link><description><![CDATA[A physician in a dim room used a sealed black box to hear disease from distant blood - how did the sealed dynamizer expose them?<br /><br />The sealed black box that made doctors hear disease<br /><br />In this episode we follow the documented history of Albert Abrams and the sealed devices he built, tracing how a medical theory, a set of procedures, and a leasing model created an empire of diagnostic ritual. How did procedures that sounded scientific survive scrutiny for decades?<br /><br />Person: Albert Abrams<br />Date: 1924 (Scientific American investigation)<br />Location: United States<br />Device: dynamizer, oscilloclast and thirteen sealed machines<br /><br />- Abrams published a theory claiming bodies emitted disease-specific energy "frequencies" and expanded it across books and devices.<br />- He developed a sequence of thirteen named instruments (central ones: dynamizer for diagnosis, oscilloclast for treatment) leased to practitioners.<br />- The machines were sealed, black boxes leased on contracts that forbade opening, so practitioners operated without seeing internal mechanisms.<br />- Diagnostic sessions used a volunteer, a drop of a distant patient's blood on filter paper, wires to the volunteer's forehead, and a clinician tapping for tonal shifts.<br />- Scientific American investigators opened a device in 1924 and found wires connected to nothing and a power cord that carried no current.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913702</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:15 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913702/0023.mp3" length="14382664" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A physician in a dim room used a sealed black box to hear disease from distant blood - how did the sealed dynamizer expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The sealed black box that made doctors hear disease&#13;
&#13;
In this episode we follow the documented history of Albert...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A physician in a dim room used a sealed black box to hear disease from distant blood - how did the sealed dynamizer expose them?<br /><br />The sealed black box that made doctors hear disease<br /><br />In this episode we follow the documented history of Albert Abrams and the sealed devices he built, tracing how a medical theory, a set of procedures, and a leasing model created an empire of diagnostic ritual. How did procedures that sounded scientific survive scrutiny for decades?<br /><br />Person: Albert Abrams<br />Date: 1924 (Scientific American investigation)<br />Location: United States<br />Device: dynamizer, oscilloclast and thirteen sealed machines<br /><br />- Abrams published a theory claiming bodies emitted disease-specific energy "frequencies" and expanded it across books and devices.<br />- He developed a sequence of thirteen named instruments (central ones: dynamizer for diagnosis, oscilloclast for treatment) leased to practitioners.<br />- The machines were sealed, black boxes leased on contracts that forbade opening, so practitioners operated without seeing internal mechanisms.<br />- Diagnostic sessions used a volunteer, a drop of a distant patient's blood on filter paper, wires to the volunteer's forehead, and a clinician tapping for tonal shifts.<br />- Scientific American investigators opened a device in 1924 and found wires connected to nothing and a power cord that carried no current.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>899</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>A capillary tube that shrank cells and started a scientific revolution</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-capillary-tube-that-shrank-cells-and-started-a-scientific-revolution--74913701</link><description><![CDATA[A young researcher’s photo of cells in a capillary tube led to an acid-bath method to make mouse blood into stem cells - but could any lab reproduce it?<br /><br />A capillary tube that shrank cells and started a scientific revolution<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the sequence of observations and decisions that launched the STAP controversy, from a single shrinkage seen in a capillary tube to an acid-bath protocol published in Nature. What happened between that microscope image and the worldwide scramble to repeat the result?<br /><br />Person: Haruko Obokata<br />Person: Charles Vacanti<br />Person: Yoshiki Sasai<br />Date: January 29, 2014<br />Location: RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe<br /><br />- A 2008 observation: mouse cells passed through a narrow capillary tube shrank and changed shape under Obokata’s microscope.<br />- Obokata moved from Vacanti’s lab at Harvard Medical School to RIKEN and continued work on stress-induced cell reversion.<br />- The published STAP protocol: CD45-positive spleen cells, pH 5.7 solution, 30-minute acid bath, reported >50% conversion among survivors.<br />- High-profile images and videos showed Oct4 expression and fluorescent embryos, prompting rapid attention and attempts to replicate.<br />- Within weeks, multiple international labs followed the protocol exactly and consistently failed to reproduce Oct4 activation or pluripotency.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913701</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:12 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913701/0022.mp3" length="16327010" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A young researcher’s photo of cells in a capillary tube led to an acid-bath method to make mouse blood into stem cells - but could any lab reproduce it?&#13;
&#13;
A capillary tube that shrank cells and started a scientific revolution&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A young researcher’s photo of cells in a capillary tube led to an acid-bath method to make mouse blood into stem cells - but could any lab reproduce it?<br /><br />A capillary tube that shrank cells and started a scientific revolution<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the sequence of observations and decisions that launched the STAP controversy, from a single shrinkage seen in a capillary tube to an acid-bath protocol published in Nature. What happened between that microscope image and the worldwide scramble to repeat the result?<br /><br />Person: Haruko Obokata<br />Person: Charles Vacanti<br />Person: Yoshiki Sasai<br />Date: January 29, 2014<br />Location: RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe<br /><br />- A 2008 observation: mouse cells passed through a narrow capillary tube shrank and changed shape under Obokata’s microscope.<br />- Obokata moved from Vacanti’s lab at Harvard Medical School to RIKEN and continued work on stress-induced cell reversion.<br />- The published STAP protocol: CD45-positive spleen cells, pH 5.7 solution, 30-minute acid bath, reported >50% conversion among survivors.<br />- High-profile images and videos showed Oct4 expression and fluorescent embryos, prompting rapid attention and attempts to replicate.<br />- Within weeks, multiple international labs followed the protocol exactly and consistently failed to reproduce Oct4 activation or pluripotency.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1021</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Questionnaire That Let In a Contaminated Donation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-questionnaire-that-let-in-a-contaminated-donation--74913699</link><description><![CDATA[A man in a Dublin clinic gives blood after one questionnaire change - and that form is the only thing between donors and recipients in the HIV era?<br /><br />The Questionnaire That Let In a Contaminated Donation<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a single figure on a blood-donor questionnaire reshaped who could give blood and why that mattered. The episode traces the ban’s origins, the shrinking HIV testing window, and the incidents that forced questions about whether the rule still matched the science.<br /><br />Date: January 16, 2017<br />Location: D'Olier Street, Dublin<br />Period: 1983-2017<br />Event: lifetime ban on men who have sex with men from donating blood<br />Case: New Zealand clotting factor recall (2003)<br /><br />- A 1983 federal policy instituted a categorical lifetime deferral for any man who had had sex with another man since 1977, using a questionnaire as the primary safeguard.<br />- Early ELISA tests had a detection window averaging 22 days but sometimes extending to three or six months, leaving a clinical rationale for strict deferral.<br />- Isaac Asimov contracted HIV from a transfusion after surgery, putting a public face on transfusion-transmitted infection risks for recipients with no behavioral risk.<br />- In 2003 New Zealand recalled four million NZD of clotting factor after a donor who passed screening later tested HIV-positive, and no recipients were infected.<br />- By 2015 Canada estimated transfusion-transmitted HIV risk at about 1 in 21.4 million donations, prompting debates over proportionality as testing improved.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913699</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913699/0021.mp3" length="14878782" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A man in a Dublin clinic gives blood after one questionnaire change - and that form is the only thing between donors and recipients in the HIV era?&#13;
&#13;
The Questionnaire That Let In a Contaminated Donation&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow how a single...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A man in a Dublin clinic gives blood after one questionnaire change - and that form is the only thing between donors and recipients in the HIV era?<br /><br />The Questionnaire That Let In a Contaminated Donation<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a single figure on a blood-donor questionnaire reshaped who could give blood and why that mattered. The episode traces the ban’s origins, the shrinking HIV testing window, and the incidents that forced questions about whether the rule still matched the science.<br /><br />Date: January 16, 2017<br />Location: D'Olier Street, Dublin<br />Period: 1983-2017<br />Event: lifetime ban on men who have sex with men from donating blood<br />Case: New Zealand clotting factor recall (2003)<br /><br />- A 1983 federal policy instituted a categorical lifetime deferral for any man who had had sex with another man since 1977, using a questionnaire as the primary safeguard.<br />- Early ELISA tests had a detection window averaging 22 days but sometimes extending to three or six months, leaving a clinical rationale for strict deferral.<br />- Isaac Asimov contracted HIV from a transfusion after surgery, putting a public face on transfusion-transmitted infection risks for recipients with no behavioral risk.<br />- In 2003 New Zealand recalled four million NZD of clotting factor after a donor who passed screening later tested HIV-positive, and no recipients were infected.<br />- By 2015 Canada estimated transfusion-transmitted HIV risk at about 1 in 21.4 million donations, prompting debates over proportionality as testing improved.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>930</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The skipped phase‑three trials that let Lariam harm millions</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-skipped-phase-three-trials-that-let-lariam-harm-millions--74913695</link><description><![CDATA[A U.S. Army compound becomes Lariam, given worldwide while phase‑three trials on its psychiatric effects were skipped - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The skipped phase‑three trials that let Lariam harm millions<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the drug mefloquine from its discovery in a massive 1970s military screening through approval and global rollout, focusing on the scientific gap left when phase‑three safety and tolerability trials were skipped. What questions did that omission leave about the drug’s effects on the human mind?<br /><br />Person: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research<br />Compound: mefloquine (compound number 142,490)<br />Brand: Lariam<br />Date: 1984 (Switzerland approval); 1989 (FDA approval)<br />Finding: Phase‑three safety and tolerability trials were skipped<br /><br />- 250,000 antimalarial compounds were screened in the 1970s to find compound 142,490.<br />- Walter Reed completed phase one and two trials and transferred data to Hoffmann‑LaRoche and SmithKline.<br />- Regulatory approval proceeded after increasing the dose from 250 mg every two weeks to 250 mg weekly during studies with Peace Corps volunteers.<br />- Mefloquine is a chiral racemate with four stereoisomers, acts as a 5‑HT2A partial agonist and serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and has a 2-4 week mean plasma half‑life.<br />- By the early 1990s, case reports and incidence figures linked preventive and therapeutic use to varying rates of neuropsychiatric and CNS adverse events.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913695</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913695/0020.mp3" length="13263787" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A U.S. Army compound becomes Lariam, given worldwide while phase‑three trials on its psychiatric effects were skipped - how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The skipped phase‑three trials that let Lariam harm millions&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the drug...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A U.S. Army compound becomes Lariam, given worldwide while phase‑three trials on its psychiatric effects were skipped - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The skipped phase‑three trials that let Lariam harm millions<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the drug mefloquine from its discovery in a massive 1970s military screening through approval and global rollout, focusing on the scientific gap left when phase‑three safety and tolerability trials were skipped. What questions did that omission leave about the drug’s effects on the human mind?<br /><br />Person: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research<br />Compound: mefloquine (compound number 142,490)<br />Brand: Lariam<br />Date: 1984 (Switzerland approval); 1989 (FDA approval)<br />Finding: Phase‑three safety and tolerability trials were skipped<br /><br />- 250,000 antimalarial compounds were screened in the 1970s to find compound 142,490.<br />- Walter Reed completed phase one and two trials and transferred data to Hoffmann‑LaRoche and SmithKline.<br />- Regulatory approval proceeded after increasing the dose from 250 mg every two weeks to 250 mg weekly during studies with Peace Corps volunteers.<br />- Mefloquine is a chiral racemate with four stereoisomers, acts as a 5‑HT2A partial agonist and serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and has a 2-4 week mean plasma half‑life.<br />- By the early 1990s, case reports and incidence figures linked preventive and therapeutic use to varying rates of neuropsychiatric and CNS adverse events.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>829</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ammonium Nitrate Switch That Shredded Airbags and Killed</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ammonium-nitrate-switch-that-shredded-airbags-and-killed--74913694</link><description><![CDATA[A pregnant woman in Malaysia is killed by a Takata airbag fragment - how did a 1990s chemical switch expose millions?<br /><br />The Ammonium Nitrate Switch That Shredded Airbags and Killed<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence that connected a corporate chemical decision to deadly airbag failures worldwide. We trace the technical risks, manufacturing choices, and the recall responses that raised the question: how many vehicles - and lives - were left vulnerable?<br /><br />Person: Takezo Takada<br />Company: Takata Corporation<br />Propellant switch: sodium azide → ammonium nitrate (late 1990s)<br />Location: Monclova, Coahuila, Mexico (TK Holdings plant)<br />Event: June 2014 coordinated recalls by seven automakers<br /><br />- A minor 2014 collision in Malaysia became fatal when a metal fragment from a Takata inflator sliced through an airbag.<br />- Takata originated as a textile webbing maker and evolved into a major global airbag supplier controlling ~20% of the market by 2014.<br />- In the late 1990s Takata replaced sodium azide with cheaper ammonium nitrate as the inflator propellant.<br />- Ammonium nitrate’s sensitivity to moisture and heat can degrade burning behavior and cause inflator ruptures that propel metal fragments.<br />- In June 2014 seven automakers recalled more than three million vehicles after Takata acknowledged mishandling propellant manufacture and storage at its Mexican plant.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913694</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913694/0019.mp3" length="15094449" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A pregnant woman in Malaysia is killed by a Takata airbag fragment - how did a 1990s chemical switch expose millions?&#13;
&#13;
The Ammonium Nitrate Switch That Shredded Airbags and Killed&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we lay out the sequence that connected a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A pregnant woman in Malaysia is killed by a Takata airbag fragment - how did a 1990s chemical switch expose millions?<br /><br />The Ammonium Nitrate Switch That Shredded Airbags and Killed<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence that connected a corporate chemical decision to deadly airbag failures worldwide. We trace the technical risks, manufacturing choices, and the recall responses that raised the question: how many vehicles - and lives - were left vulnerable?<br /><br />Person: Takezo Takada<br />Company: Takata Corporation<br />Propellant switch: sodium azide → ammonium nitrate (late 1990s)<br />Location: Monclova, Coahuila, Mexico (TK Holdings plant)<br />Event: June 2014 coordinated recalls by seven automakers<br /><br />- A minor 2014 collision in Malaysia became fatal when a metal fragment from a Takata inflator sliced through an airbag.<br />- Takata originated as a textile webbing maker and evolved into a major global airbag supplier controlling ~20% of the market by 2014.<br />- In the late 1990s Takata replaced sodium azide with cheaper ammonium nitrate as the inflator propellant.<br />- Ammonium nitrate’s sensitivity to moisture and heat can degrade burning behavior and cause inflator ruptures that propel metal fragments.<br />- In June 2014 seven automakers recalled more than three million vehicles after Takata acknowledged mishandling propellant manufacture and storage at its Mexican plant.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>944</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Rye Sclerotium That Turned Loaves into Burning Flesh</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-rye-sclerotium-that-turned-loaves-into-burning-flesh--74913692</link><description><![CDATA[A Rhine valley farmer eats the same rye loaf as his fingers rot and neighbors see visions; how did ergot-infected grain expose an unseen poison?<br /><br />The Rye Sclerotium That Turned Loaves into Burning Flesh<br /><br />In this episode, we outline the recurring outbreaks of ergotism from 857 onward and trace how a microscopic fungus in rye bread produced two distinct clinical syndromes. We ask how environmental, agricultural and social conditions let contaminated loaves keep returning to table and to tragedy.<br /><br />Person: Order of Saint Anthony<br />Date: 857 (first written account)<br />Topic: Ergotism caused by Claviceps purpurea<br />Location: Rhine valley and broader northern/central Europe<br />Study: 2003 study identifying east-west pattern in symptoms<br /><br />- A dark, elongated sclerotium formed in rye heads and could be spotted in the field but was invisible once milled and baked.<br />- Heat-resistant, odorless alkaloids in infected rye produced gangrenous symptoms (burning limbs, tissue death) and convulsive symptoms (spasms, hallucinations) depending on strain and soil.<br />- Rural, poor communities depended on rye because wheat failed in cold, wet uplands, so contaminated grain was consumed daily and stored for winter.<br />- Alkaloids accumulated over weeks, passed into breast milk, and caused chronic effects like spontaneous abortion and infertility that medieval observers misread as divine punishment.<br />- Pilgrimages and removing victims from contaminated supplies sometimes led to recovery, which contemporaries and the church interpreted as miracles rather than interruption of exposure.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913692</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:56 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913692/0018.mp3" length="16589071" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Rhine valley farmer eats the same rye loaf as his fingers rot and neighbors see visions; how did ergot-infected grain expose an unseen poison?&#13;
&#13;
The Rye Sclerotium That Turned Loaves into Burning Flesh&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we outline the recurring...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Rhine valley farmer eats the same rye loaf as his fingers rot and neighbors see visions; how did ergot-infected grain expose an unseen poison?<br /><br />The Rye Sclerotium That Turned Loaves into Burning Flesh<br /><br />In this episode, we outline the recurring outbreaks of ergotism from 857 onward and trace how a microscopic fungus in rye bread produced two distinct clinical syndromes. We ask how environmental, agricultural and social conditions let contaminated loaves keep returning to table and to tragedy.<br /><br />Person: Order of Saint Anthony<br />Date: 857 (first written account)<br />Topic: Ergotism caused by Claviceps purpurea<br />Location: Rhine valley and broader northern/central Europe<br />Study: 2003 study identifying east-west pattern in symptoms<br /><br />- A dark, elongated sclerotium formed in rye heads and could be spotted in the field but was invisible once milled and baked.<br />- Heat-resistant, odorless alkaloids in infected rye produced gangrenous symptoms (burning limbs, tissue death) and convulsive symptoms (spasms, hallucinations) depending on strain and soil.<br />- Rural, poor communities depended on rye because wheat failed in cold, wet uplands, so contaminated grain was consumed daily and stored for winter.<br />- Alkaloids accumulated over weeks, passed into breast milk, and caused chronic effects like spontaneous abortion and infertility that medieval observers misread as divine punishment.<br />- Pilgrimages and removing victims from contaminated supplies sometimes led to recovery, which contemporaries and the church interpreted as miracles rather than interruption of exposure.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1037</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Glucometer Reading That Exposed Repeated Nightly Insulin Hits</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-glucometer-reading-that-exposed-repeated-nightly-insulin-hits--74913691</link><description><![CDATA[An overnight nursing assistant on Ward 3A at a veterans hospital finds patients crashing from unexplained low blood sugar-how did that expose them?<br /><br />The Glucometer Reading That Exposed Repeated Nightly Insulin Hits<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events on Ward three A at the Louis A. Johnson Veterans Medical Center: who the patients were, who worked the nights, and the readings and recordings that raised alarms. What patterns and decisions led investigators to ask whether someone had been causing hypoglycemia?<br /><br />Person: Archie Edgell<br />Location: Louis A. Johnson Veterans Medical Center, Clarksburg, West Virginia<br />Date: July 2017-June 2018<br />Event: Sixty-six hypoglycemic crises on Ward three A<br />Person: Reta Phyllis Mays<br /><br />- An eighty-four-year-old veteran was found with a glucometer reading of 24 despite no diabetes diagnosis and no insulin documented that night.<br />- Sixty-six hypoglycemic events accumulated on the overnight medical-surgical unit, with twenty-one triggering adverse event findings and four deaths within sixteen days.<br />- Reta Mays, hired as a nursing assistant in June 2015 and assigned to nights in July 2017, had no license or certification to administer medications.<br />- Archie Edgell’s autopsy noted four separate injection sites that were not recorded in any chart.<br />- A recorded phone call from Mays referenced a specific patient and glucose number in a way investigators later called a clear window into what was happening.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913691</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:52 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913691/0017.mp3" length="15341462" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>An overnight nursing assistant on Ward 3A at a veterans hospital finds patients crashing from unexplained low blood sugar-how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The Glucometer Reading That Exposed Repeated Nightly Insulin Hits&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we lay out the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[An overnight nursing assistant on Ward 3A at a veterans hospital finds patients crashing from unexplained low blood sugar-how did that expose them?<br /><br />The Glucometer Reading That Exposed Repeated Nightly Insulin Hits<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events on Ward three A at the Louis A. Johnson Veterans Medical Center: who the patients were, who worked the nights, and the readings and recordings that raised alarms. What patterns and decisions led investigators to ask whether someone had been causing hypoglycemia?<br /><br />Person: Archie Edgell<br />Location: Louis A. Johnson Veterans Medical Center, Clarksburg, West Virginia<br />Date: July 2017-June 2018<br />Event: Sixty-six hypoglycemic crises on Ward three A<br />Person: Reta Phyllis Mays<br /><br />- An eighty-four-year-old veteran was found with a glucometer reading of 24 despite no diabetes diagnosis and no insulin documented that night.<br />- Sixty-six hypoglycemic events accumulated on the overnight medical-surgical unit, with twenty-one triggering adverse event findings and four deaths within sixteen days.<br />- Reta Mays, hired as a nursing assistant in June 2015 and assigned to nights in July 2017, had no license or certification to administer medications.<br />- Archie Edgell’s autopsy noted four separate injection sites that were not recorded in any chart.<br />- A recorded phone call from Mays referenced a specific patient and glucose number in a way investigators later called a clear window into what was happening.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>959</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The screening value read 56.7 - the coordinator marked it negative</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-screening-value-read-56-7-the-coordinator-marked-it-negative--74913690</link><description><![CDATA[A transplant coordinator in Hsinchu hears "56.7" and marks an HIV screening negative-how did one misread number expose Taiwan's organ system?<br /><br />The screening value read 56.7 - the coordinator marked it negative<br /><br />In this episode, we follow a chain of routine actions across hospitals, phone lines, forms and databases that led a high HIV screening value to be recorded as negative. The episode traces the decisions, system design and ordinary moments that let a single number travel unchecked-what lapses made that possible?<br /><br />Person: Ko Wen-je<br />Date: August 23, 2011<br />Location: Hsinchu to Taipei<br />Event: HIV screening value 56.7 read as negative<br />Institution: National Taiwan University Hospital<br /><br />- A medical technologist at NTUH read an HIV screening value aloud as "fifty-six point seven" and said "reactive" during the call.<br />- The transplant coordinator, located in Hsinchu and off the hospital system, wrote the number down accurately and filled the interpretation field as "negative."<br />- The coordinator repeated her interpretation twice on the call; both times the line went quiet and no correction was made.<br />- The national organ matching system Ko Wen-je designed centralized data and matching but lacked a built-in review mechanism separating procurement and transplant teams.<br />- The workflow relied on phone calls, forms and human interpretation across sites-practices that had been used successfully over five thousand times before this night.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913690</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913690/0016.mp3" length="14110155" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A transplant coordinator in Hsinchu hears "56.7" and marks an HIV screening negative-how did one misread number expose Taiwan's organ system?&#13;
&#13;
The screening value read 56.7 - the coordinator marked it negative&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow a chain...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A transplant coordinator in Hsinchu hears "56.7" and marks an HIV screening negative-how did one misread number expose Taiwan's organ system?<br /><br />The screening value read 56.7 - the coordinator marked it negative<br /><br />In this episode, we follow a chain of routine actions across hospitals, phone lines, forms and databases that led a high HIV screening value to be recorded as negative. The episode traces the decisions, system design and ordinary moments that let a single number travel unchecked-what lapses made that possible?<br /><br />Person: Ko Wen-je<br />Date: August 23, 2011<br />Location: Hsinchu to Taipei<br />Event: HIV screening value 56.7 read as negative<br />Institution: National Taiwan University Hospital<br /><br />- A medical technologist at NTUH read an HIV screening value aloud as "fifty-six point seven" and said "reactive" during the call.<br />- The transplant coordinator, located in Hsinchu and off the hospital system, wrote the number down accurately and filled the interpretation field as "negative."<br />- The coordinator repeated her interpretation twice on the call; both times the line went quiet and no correction was made.<br />- The national organ matching system Ko Wen-je designed centralized data and matching but lacked a built-in review mechanism separating procurement and transplant teams.<br />- The workflow relied on phone calls, forms and human interpretation across sites-practices that had been used successfully over five thousand times before this night.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>882</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>When Doctors Become Judges: How Soviet Psychiatry Neutralized Dissent</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/when-doctors-become-judges-how-soviet-psychiatry-neutralized-dissent--74913688</link><description><![CDATA[A Soviet general is labeled mentally ill for calling for reform, as psychiatrists and the KGB conspire to neutralize dissent-how did that expose them?<br /><br />When Doctors Become Judges: How Soviet Psychiatry Neutralized Dissent<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how psychiatric diagnosis was used as a tool across decades to detain political critics without trial, and how institutions, laws, and individual clinicians made that possible. What did the medical language and legal framework allow authorities to do?<br /><br />Person: Pyotr Grigorenko<br />Person: Andrei Snezhnevsky<br />Institution: Serbsky Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry<br />Event: transfer of Kazan Psychiatric Prison Hospital to NKVD control, 1939<br />Law: Article 70 and Article 191 of the RSFSR Criminal Code<br /><br />- A marginal pencil note ordered a patient “not to discharge without coordination with KGB,” entering medical records despite no crime.<br />- Andrei Snezhnevsky developed “sluggish schizophrenia,” a diagnostic category broad enough to include dissent like reformist beliefs.<br />- The NKVD took direct control of the Kazan Psychiatric Prison Hospital in 1939, formalizing psychiatric confinement as an alternative to ordinary imprisonment.<br />- Commissions at the Serbsky Center, including Snezhnevsky and Lunts, issued authoritative evaluations used to suspend criminal proceedings.<br />- General Pyotr Grigorenko spoke at a party conference calling for reform, was arrested, and sent before a Serbsky commission that linked political critique to mental illness.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913688</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:44 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913688/0015.mp3" length="14768440" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Soviet general is labeled mentally ill for calling for reform, as psychiatrists and the KGB conspire to neutralize dissent-how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
When Doctors Become Judges: How Soviet Psychiatry Neutralized Dissent&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Soviet general is labeled mentally ill for calling for reform, as psychiatrists and the KGB conspire to neutralize dissent-how did that expose them?<br /><br />When Doctors Become Judges: How Soviet Psychiatry Neutralized Dissent<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how psychiatric diagnosis was used as a tool across decades to detain political critics without trial, and how institutions, laws, and individual clinicians made that possible. What did the medical language and legal framework allow authorities to do?<br /><br />Person: Pyotr Grigorenko<br />Person: Andrei Snezhnevsky<br />Institution: Serbsky Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry<br />Event: transfer of Kazan Psychiatric Prison Hospital to NKVD control, 1939<br />Law: Article 70 and Article 191 of the RSFSR Criminal Code<br /><br />- A marginal pencil note ordered a patient “not to discharge without coordination with KGB,” entering medical records despite no crime.<br />- Andrei Snezhnevsky developed “sluggish schizophrenia,” a diagnostic category broad enough to include dissent like reformist beliefs.<br />- The NKVD took direct control of the Kazan Psychiatric Prison Hospital in 1939, formalizing psychiatric confinement as an alternative to ordinary imprisonment.<br />- Commissions at the Serbsky Center, including Snezhnevsky and Lunts, issued authoritative evaluations used to suspend criminal proceedings.<br />- General Pyotr Grigorenko spoke at a party conference calling for reform, was arrested, and sent before a Serbsky commission that linked political critique to mental illness.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>923</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The closed distribution network blocked hospitals and let Turing gouge price</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-closed-distribution-network-blocked-hospitals-and-let-turing-gouge-price--74913685</link><description><![CDATA[A newly formed pharma CEO buys a 62-year-old lifesaving drug and overnight jacks Daraprim’s price-how did the closed distribution network enable it?<br /><br />The closed distribution network blocked hospitals and let Turing gouge price<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the chain of events that led a single tablet of Daraprim to leap from $13.50 to $750 overnight and how the company and its founder positioned the drug behind a restricted supply path. What mechanisms and decisions made that abrupt repricing possible?<br /><br />Person: Martin Shkreli<br />Date: September 17, 2015<br />Drug: Daraprim (pyrimethamine)<br />Company: Turing Pharmaceuticals<br />Sale price: $55,000,000<br /><br />- Impax tightened Daraprim’s U.S. distribution two months before selling marketing rights to Turing.<br />- Turing was incorporated in February 2015 and acquired Daraprim on August 10, 2015.<br />- The closed distribution network required hospitals and pharmacies to obtain the drug through a controlled channel.<br />- The restricted access prevented generic manufacturers from easily obtaining samples needed for FDA approval.<br />- Within weeks of the price hike, 164 organizations across 31 states plus DC and Puerto Rico demanded a return to the prior price.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913685</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:40 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913685/0014.mp3" length="16522197" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A newly formed pharma CEO buys a 62-year-old lifesaving drug and overnight jacks Daraprim’s price-how did the closed distribution network enable it?&#13;
&#13;
The closed distribution network blocked hospitals and let Turing gouge price&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A newly formed pharma CEO buys a 62-year-old lifesaving drug and overnight jacks Daraprim’s price-how did the closed distribution network enable it?<br /><br />The closed distribution network blocked hospitals and let Turing gouge price<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the chain of events that led a single tablet of Daraprim to leap from $13.50 to $750 overnight and how the company and its founder positioned the drug behind a restricted supply path. What mechanisms and decisions made that abrupt repricing possible?<br /><br />Person: Martin Shkreli<br />Date: September 17, 2015<br />Drug: Daraprim (pyrimethamine)<br />Company: Turing Pharmaceuticals<br />Sale price: $55,000,000<br /><br />- Impax tightened Daraprim’s U.S. distribution two months before selling marketing rights to Turing.<br />- Turing was incorporated in February 2015 and acquired Daraprim on August 10, 2015.<br />- The closed distribution network required hospitals and pharmacies to obtain the drug through a controlled channel.<br />- The restricted access prevented generic manufacturers from easily obtaining samples needed for FDA approval.<br />- Within weeks of the price hike, 164 organizations across 31 states plus DC and Puerto Rico demanded a return to the prior price.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1033</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>When He Said "I've Killed": Medicine's Quiet History of Anti‑Jewish Violence</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/when-he-said-i-ve-killed-medicine-s-quiet-history-of-anti-jewish-violence--74913683</link><description><![CDATA[A Sydney nurse tells an Israeli influencer on a video call “I’ve killed” - how does medicine’s history of anti‑Jewish violence explain that moment?<br /><br />When He Said "I've Killed": Medicine's Quiet History of Anti‑Jewish Violence<br /><br />In this episode, we follow a February video call from Bankstown Hospital that captured a nurse claiming to have killed Israeli patients and place that moment within four centuries of medical antisemitism. The episode traces patterns of exclusion, accusation, and institutional silence to ask how such violence has been enabled inside hospitals.<br /><br />Person: Max Veifer<br />Date: February 12, 2025<br />Location: Bankstown Hospital, Sydney<br />Event: Nurse on video call claims to have killed Israeli patients<br />Period: 1622-mid‑20th century patterns discussed<br /><br />- Two nurses joined a short video call with Israeli social media influencer Max Veifer where one nurse said he had already killed several Israeli patients.<br />- In 1622 Vicente da Costa de Mattos published an accusation that conversos entered medicine to kill Catholic patients, a claim circulated and believed.<br />- From medieval times through the 19th century, Jews were characterized as vectors of disease, later medicalized by physicians in 18th-19th century England.<br />- Jewish hospitals began opening from 1854 because Jewish medical students and physicians were excluded from existing institutions and clinical placements.<br />- In 1934 Montreal, Notre Dame Hospital hired Samuel Rabinovitch and after a four‑day intern strike his resignation ended the conflict without institutional defense.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913683</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:35 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913683/0013.mp3" length="14449955" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Sydney nurse tells an Israeli influencer on a video call “I’ve killed” - how does medicine’s history of anti‑Jewish violence explain that moment?&#13;
&#13;
When He Said "I've Killed": Medicine's Quiet History of Anti‑Jewish Violence&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Sydney nurse tells an Israeli influencer on a video call “I’ve killed” - how does medicine’s history of anti‑Jewish violence explain that moment?<br /><br />When He Said "I've Killed": Medicine's Quiet History of Anti‑Jewish Violence<br /><br />In this episode, we follow a February video call from Bankstown Hospital that captured a nurse claiming to have killed Israeli patients and place that moment within four centuries of medical antisemitism. The episode traces patterns of exclusion, accusation, and institutional silence to ask how such violence has been enabled inside hospitals.<br /><br />Person: Max Veifer<br />Date: February 12, 2025<br />Location: Bankstown Hospital, Sydney<br />Event: Nurse on video call claims to have killed Israeli patients<br />Period: 1622-mid‑20th century patterns discussed<br /><br />- Two nurses joined a short video call with Israeli social media influencer Max Veifer where one nurse said he had already killed several Israeli patients.<br />- In 1622 Vicente da Costa de Mattos published an accusation that conversos entered medicine to kill Catholic patients, a claim circulated and believed.<br />- From medieval times through the 19th century, Jews were characterized as vectors of disease, later medicalized by physicians in 18th-19th century England.<br />- Jewish hospitals began opening from 1854 because Jewish medical students and physicians were excluded from existing institutions and clinical placements.<br />- In 1934 Montreal, Notre Dame Hospital hired Samuel Rabinovitch and after a four‑day intern strike his resignation ended the conflict without institutional defense.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>904</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The lab reagent that turned negative tests positive</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-lab-reagent-that-turned-negative-tests-positive--74913682</link><description><![CDATA[A lab reagent allegedly flipped dozens of chronic fatigue syndrome blood tests from negative to positive-how did that ghost make it into Science?<br /><br />The lab reagent that turned negative tests positive<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a privately funded institute, a family’s hope, and a single research paper converged around a claimed viral cause for chronic fatigue syndrome. The episode traces the decisions, sample handling, and lab changes that led to a dramatic shift in test results and asks what went wrong in the chain of research.<br /><br />Person: Andrea Whittemore<br />Person: Annette and Harvey Whittemore<br />Person: Judy Mikovits<br />Person: Daniel Peterson<br />Event: October 2009 Science paper reporting XMRV in CFS patients<br /><br />- The Whittemore Peterson Institute was founded with five million dollars from Harvey and Annette Whittemore after their daughter Andrea’s CFS diagnosis.<br />- Judy Mikovits joined as research director, bringing reagents from Bob Silverman and a conviction that a retrovirus caused CFS.<br />- Early XMRV tests in 2007-2008 found 2 of 20 samples positive until laboratory conditions were adjusted and all 20 tested positive.<br />- The positive findings were kept from co-founder Daniel Peterson and submitted to Science in May 2009, published in October 2009 claiming 67% of CFS patients were XMRV-positive.<br />- More than a thousand people paid up to $450 each for blood tests after the paper; two years later science concluded XMRV had never naturally infected humans.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913682</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913682/0012.mp3" length="16513002" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A lab reagent allegedly flipped dozens of chronic fatigue syndrome blood tests from negative to positive-how did that ghost make it into Science?&#13;
&#13;
The lab reagent that turned negative tests positive&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow how a privately...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A lab reagent allegedly flipped dozens of chronic fatigue syndrome blood tests from negative to positive-how did that ghost make it into Science?<br /><br />The lab reagent that turned negative tests positive<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a privately funded institute, a family’s hope, and a single research paper converged around a claimed viral cause for chronic fatigue syndrome. The episode traces the decisions, sample handling, and lab changes that led to a dramatic shift in test results and asks what went wrong in the chain of research.<br /><br />Person: Andrea Whittemore<br />Person: Annette and Harvey Whittemore<br />Person: Judy Mikovits<br />Person: Daniel Peterson<br />Event: October 2009 Science paper reporting XMRV in CFS patients<br /><br />- The Whittemore Peterson Institute was founded with five million dollars from Harvey and Annette Whittemore after their daughter Andrea’s CFS diagnosis.<br />- Judy Mikovits joined as research director, bringing reagents from Bob Silverman and a conviction that a retrovirus caused CFS.<br />- Early XMRV tests in 2007-2008 found 2 of 20 samples positive until laboratory conditions were adjusted and all 20 tested positive.<br />- The positive findings were kept from co-founder Daniel Peterson and submitted to Science in May 2009, published in October 2009 claiming 67% of CFS patients were XMRV-positive.<br />- More than a thousand people paid up to $450 each for blood tests after the paper; two years later science concluded XMRV had never naturally infected humans.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1033</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Diary That Turned a Dead Brown Dog Into a Riot</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-diary-that-turned-a-dead-brown-dog-into-a-riot--74913680</link><description><![CDATA[A London professor reuses a small brown dog in a university lab and an activist diary accuses him - how did that diary expose them?<br /><br />The Diary That Turned a Dead Brown Dog Into a Riot<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the events that connected a laboratory operation, a disputed diary entry, and a public uproar in early 20th‑century London. The episode follows who was present, what was recorded, and how a single diary set off a chain of public and legal confrontations.<br /><br />Person: Ernest Starling<br />Date: 2 February 1903<br />Location: University College London; Battersea<br />Event: Reuse of a small brown mongrel in a physiology demonstration<br />Topic: Diary entries by Lizzy Lind af Hageby and Leisa Schartau alleging mistreatment<br /><br />- Two Swedish anti‑vivisectionists enrolled at the London School of Medicine for Women to observe and kept notebooks of laboratory demonstrations.<br />- A small brown terrier that had undergone abdominal surgery in December was operated on again on 2 February 1903 and displayed to students strapped to a board.<br />- Professors Ernest Starling and William Bayliss described anaesthetic use; witnesses and diary authors reported signs the dog struggled and no apparent anaesthesia.<br />- Henry Dale originally said the dog was killed with chloroform, then corrected his court testimony to say it was killed by a knife through the heart.<br />- Stephen Coleridge, having read the diary, publicly accused conduct at the laboratory, triggering a libel trial and months of public conflict.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913680</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:28 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913680/0011.mp3" length="15166755" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A London professor reuses a small brown dog in a university lab and an activist diary accuses him - how did that diary expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The Diary That Turned a Dead Brown Dog Into a Riot&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we trace the events that connected a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A London professor reuses a small brown dog in a university lab and an activist diary accuses him - how did that diary expose them?<br /><br />The Diary That Turned a Dead Brown Dog Into a Riot<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the events that connected a laboratory operation, a disputed diary entry, and a public uproar in early 20th‑century London. The episode follows who was present, what was recorded, and how a single diary set off a chain of public and legal confrontations.<br /><br />Person: Ernest Starling<br />Date: 2 February 1903<br />Location: University College London; Battersea<br />Event: Reuse of a small brown mongrel in a physiology demonstration<br />Topic: Diary entries by Lizzy Lind af Hageby and Leisa Schartau alleging mistreatment<br /><br />- Two Swedish anti‑vivisectionists enrolled at the London School of Medicine for Women to observe and kept notebooks of laboratory demonstrations.<br />- A small brown terrier that had undergone abdominal surgery in December was operated on again on 2 February 1903 and displayed to students strapped to a board.<br />- Professors Ernest Starling and William Bayliss described anaesthetic use; witnesses and diary authors reported signs the dog struggled and no apparent anaesthesia.<br />- Henry Dale originally said the dog was killed with chloroform, then corrected his court testimony to say it was killed by a knife through the heart.<br />- Stephen Coleridge, having read the diary, publicly accused conduct at the laboratory, triggering a libel trial and months of public conflict.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>948</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The unlicensed injector who gave him shots and silenced answers</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-unlicensed-injector-who-gave-him-shots-and-silenced-answers--74913678</link><description><![CDATA[A young Nigerian artist is carried into a Lagos hospital already in rigor mortis - what happened?<br /><br />The unlicensed injector who gave him shots and silenced answers<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a September performance to a body brought to Perez Medcare Hospital with no pulse and rigor mortis. The episode traces the contract disputes, alleged beatings, the unlicensed person administering injections at his home, and the rushed burial that narrowed the forensic window - how did that expose them?<br /><br />Person: Ilerioluwa Oladimeji Aloba (MohBad)<br />Date: September 12, 2023<br />Location: Perez Medcare Hospital, Lagos; Ikorodu<br />Event: Performance at D'General Bitters show on September 10; body received September 12; burial September 13; exhumation September 21<br />Topic: Unlicensed injections administered at home; contract termination citing beatings, death threats, and unpaid royalties<br /><br />- Performed publicly on September 10 and was found in rigor mortis at a hospital less than 48 hours later.<br />- A person administering injections at his home was not registered with the National Association of Nigeria Nurses and Midwives.<br />- A termination document dated October 25, 2022, cited physical attacks, death threats, and unpaid royalties tied to his time at Marlian Music.<br />- Family buried the body within 24 hours citing Yoruba tradition, potentially limiting forensic evidence.<br />- Lagos State Police exhumed the body on September 21 and completed an autopsy the same day.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913678</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913678/0010.mp3" length="12852933" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A young Nigerian artist is carried into a Lagos hospital already in rigor mortis - what happened?&#13;
&#13;
The unlicensed injector who gave him shots and silenced answers&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the timeline from a September performance to a body...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A young Nigerian artist is carried into a Lagos hospital already in rigor mortis - what happened?<br /><br />The unlicensed injector who gave him shots and silenced answers<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a September performance to a body brought to Perez Medcare Hospital with no pulse and rigor mortis. The episode traces the contract disputes, alleged beatings, the unlicensed person administering injections at his home, and the rushed burial that narrowed the forensic window - how did that expose them?<br /><br />Person: Ilerioluwa Oladimeji Aloba (MohBad)<br />Date: September 12, 2023<br />Location: Perez Medcare Hospital, Lagos; Ikorodu<br />Event: Performance at D'General Bitters show on September 10; body received September 12; burial September 13; exhumation September 21<br />Topic: Unlicensed injections administered at home; contract termination citing beatings, death threats, and unpaid royalties<br /><br />- Performed publicly on September 10 and was found in rigor mortis at a hospital less than 48 hours later.<br />- A person administering injections at his home was not registered with the National Association of Nigeria Nurses and Midwives.<br />- A termination document dated October 25, 2022, cited physical attacks, death threats, and unpaid royalties tied to his time at Marlian Music.<br />- Family buried the body within 24 hours citing Yoruba tradition, potentially limiting forensic evidence.<br />- Lagos State Police exhumed the body on September 21 and completed an autopsy the same day.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>804</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Surgeon Who Severed Consent: Australia's Bega Betrayal</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-surgeon-who-severed-consent-australia-s-bega-betrayal--74913676</link><description><![CDATA[A banned obstetrician in a remote NSW town performs unsanctioned surgery-what breaks in one operating theatre?<br /><br />The Surgeon Who Severed Consent: Australia's Bega Betrayal<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the documented timeline of Graeme Stephen Reeves’s career, the complaints and bans against him, and the institutional decisions that kept him practising in rural New South Wales. What choices allowed him to operate in Bega despite an active obstetrics restriction?<br /><br />Person: Graeme Stephen Reeves<br />Date: April 2002 - began work in Greater Southern Area Health Service<br />Location: Bega and Pambula Hospitals, New South Wales south coast<br />Event: Obstetrics ban issued August 1997; continued practice in breach<br />Case: Multiple formal complaints from 1986 to 2008; Medical Errors Action Group counted 185 incidents by Feb 2008<br /><br />- She signed for lesion removal and woke to a part of her body removed she had not consented to.<br />- Thirty-five formal complaints accumulated over fifteen years before decisive action was taken.<br />- A Professional Standards Committee barred Reeves from obstetrics in August 1997, a restriction not disclosed in his job application.<br />- The Greater Southern Area Health Service recorded the obstetrics restriction in April 2002 and did not stop his practice.<br />- Pambula ceased obstetric services on 14 November 2002, yet Reeves provided obstetric care at Bega Hospital on 3 January 2003.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913676</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913676/0009.mp3" length="13761577" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A banned obstetrician in a remote NSW town performs unsanctioned surgery-what breaks in one operating theatre?&#13;
&#13;
The Surgeon Who Severed Consent: Australia's Bega Betrayal&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the documented timeline of Graeme Stephen...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A banned obstetrician in a remote NSW town performs unsanctioned surgery-what breaks in one operating theatre?<br /><br />The Surgeon Who Severed Consent: Australia's Bega Betrayal<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the documented timeline of Graeme Stephen Reeves’s career, the complaints and bans against him, and the institutional decisions that kept him practising in rural New South Wales. What choices allowed him to operate in Bega despite an active obstetrics restriction?<br /><br />Person: Graeme Stephen Reeves<br />Date: April 2002 - began work in Greater Southern Area Health Service<br />Location: Bega and Pambula Hospitals, New South Wales south coast<br />Event: Obstetrics ban issued August 1997; continued practice in breach<br />Case: Multiple formal complaints from 1986 to 2008; Medical Errors Action Group counted 185 incidents by Feb 2008<br /><br />- She signed for lesion removal and woke to a part of her body removed she had not consented to.<br />- Thirty-five formal complaints accumulated over fifteen years before decisive action was taken.<br />- A Professional Standards Committee barred Reeves from obstetrics in August 1997, a restriction not disclosed in his job application.<br />- The Greater Southern Area Health Service recorded the obstetrics restriction in April 2002 and did not stop his practice.<br />- Pambula ceased obstetric services on 14 November 2002, yet Reeves provided obstetric care at Bega Hospital on 3 January 2003.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>861</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The DNA Test That Traced Ninety-Four Children to One Doctor</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dna-test-that-traced-ninety-four-children-to-one-doctor--74913675</link><description><![CDATA[A daughter’s at-home DNA kit finds eight half-siblings who all trace to the same Indianapolis fertility clinic - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The DNA Test That Traced Ninety-Four Children to One Doctor<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a mailed saliva kit and a string of DNA matches began to unravel decades of fertility clinic practice and institutional trust. The story follows the patient who started the hunt, the genealogical work that traced matches to one physician, and the legal gaps that stalled accountability - what happens next?<br /><br />Person: Jacoba Ballard<br />Person: Donald Lee Cline<br />Location: Indianapolis, West 86th Street clinic<br />Date: fall 2014 (first sample); May 2022 (confirmed count)<br />Event: donor-conceived children traced by consumer DNA matches<br /><br />- A mailed saliva sample returned eight half-sibling matches that all pointed to the same zip code and clinic.<br />- Jacoba cross-checked genealogical databases and family trees until multiple lines converged on one doctor who had treated her mother.<br />- The Indiana Attorney General’s investigator brought Cline in, and he denied using his own genetic material.<br />- Prosecutors declined to prosecute because no Indiana statute criminalized the inseminations being alleged.<br />- By May 2022, investigators had confirmed ninety-four children linked to the same donor through DNA evidence.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913675</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:15 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913675/0008.mp3" length="16382599" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A daughter’s at-home DNA kit finds eight half-siblings who all trace to the same Indianapolis fertility clinic - how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The DNA Test That Traced Ninety-Four Children to One Doctor&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow how a mailed saliva...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A daughter’s at-home DNA kit finds eight half-siblings who all trace to the same Indianapolis fertility clinic - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The DNA Test That Traced Ninety-Four Children to One Doctor<br /><br />In this episode, we follow how a mailed saliva kit and a string of DNA matches began to unravel decades of fertility clinic practice and institutional trust. The story follows the patient who started the hunt, the genealogical work that traced matches to one physician, and the legal gaps that stalled accountability - what happens next?<br /><br />Person: Jacoba Ballard<br />Person: Donald Lee Cline<br />Location: Indianapolis, West 86th Street clinic<br />Date: fall 2014 (first sample); May 2022 (confirmed count)<br />Event: donor-conceived children traced by consumer DNA matches<br /><br />- A mailed saliva sample returned eight half-sibling matches that all pointed to the same zip code and clinic.<br />- Jacoba cross-checked genealogical databases and family trees until multiple lines converged on one doctor who had treated her mother.<br />- The Indiana Attorney General’s investigator brought Cline in, and he denied using his own genetic material.<br />- Prosecutors declined to prosecute because no Indiana statute criminalized the inseminations being alleged.<br />- By May 2022, investigators had confirmed ninety-four children linked to the same donor through DNA evidence.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1024</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Tampered Tylenol Bottle That Killed Seven People</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-tampered-tylenol-bottle-that-killed-seven-people--74913671</link><description><![CDATA[A shopper in suburban Chicago finds a cyanide‑laced Tylenol bottle - how did poisoned capsules reach store shelves?<br /><br />The Tampered Tylenol Bottle That Killed Seven People<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline and evidence around the September 1982 poisonings tied to Extra‑Strength Tylenol capsules and the questions that forced investigators into uncharted territory. How did contaminated capsules from different lots and plants get replaced on retail shelves across the Chicago area?<br /><br />Person: Mary Kellerman<br />Date: September 28-29, 1982<br />Product: Extra‑Strength Tylenol capsules<br />Location: Chicago area (multiple towns)<br />Fatalities: Seven<br /><br />- A single bottle recovered from the Janus home had 44 total capsules, 38 remaining, and six missing.<br />- Toxicology tests found four of the 38 remaining capsules contained potassium cyanide at ~3× a lethal adult dose.<br />- Contaminated capsules came from three production lots made in two separate plants in Pennsylvania and Texas.<br />- Seven separate stores across multiple towns sold tainted bottles from different lots, indicating post‑manufacture tampering.<br />- The pattern showed open‑shelf bottles were opened, capsules replaced, resealed, and returned to circulation.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913671</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913671/0007.mp3" length="14449955" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A shopper in suburban Chicago finds a cyanide‑laced Tylenol bottle - how did poisoned capsules reach store shelves?&#13;
&#13;
The Tampered Tylenol Bottle That Killed Seven People&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we follow the timeline and evidence around the September...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A shopper in suburban Chicago finds a cyanide‑laced Tylenol bottle - how did poisoned capsules reach store shelves?<br /><br />The Tampered Tylenol Bottle That Killed Seven People<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline and evidence around the September 1982 poisonings tied to Extra‑Strength Tylenol capsules and the questions that forced investigators into uncharted territory. How did contaminated capsules from different lots and plants get replaced on retail shelves across the Chicago area?<br /><br />Person: Mary Kellerman<br />Date: September 28-29, 1982<br />Product: Extra‑Strength Tylenol capsules<br />Location: Chicago area (multiple towns)<br />Fatalities: Seven<br /><br />- A single bottle recovered from the Janus home had 44 total capsules, 38 remaining, and six missing.<br />- Toxicology tests found four of the 38 remaining capsules contained potassium cyanide at ~3× a lethal adult dose.<br />- Contaminated capsules came from three production lots made in two separate plants in Pennsylvania and Texas.<br />- Seven separate stores across multiple towns sold tainted bottles from different lots, indicating post‑manufacture tampering.<br />- The pattern showed open‑shelf bottles were opened, capsules replaced, resealed, and returned to circulation.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>904</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The mayor's "air is safe" pronouncement sent workers back into the toxic pile</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-mayor-s-air-is-safe-pronouncement-sent-workers-back-into-the-toxic-pile--74913668</link><description><![CDATA[A mayor and the EPA declared Lower Manhattan's air "safe" days after 9/11, sending workers back into a toxic cloud - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The mayor's "air is safe" pronouncement sent workers back into the toxic pile<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the public statements, internal records, and on-the-ground choices that shaped who returned to Ground Zero and why. We ask how early assurances about air quality influenced rescue, recovery, and daily life amid smoldering fires.<br /><br />Person: Mayor Rudy Giuliani<br />Person: EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman<br />Event: Public assurances that "the air is safe"<br />Location: Lower Manhattan, World Trade Center site<br />Period: September-December 2001<br /><br />- Thousands of rescue workers, construction crews, and volunteers labored long shifts on a rubble pile that smoldered for three months.<br />- Air samples later showed over 2,500 contaminants including asbestos, lead, dioxins, and carbon nanotubes.<br />- Respirators designed for fine particulates were rarely used; many wore inadequate masks or none at all.<br />- Press conferences and press releases declared the air safe within days, before full contaminant counts were complete.<br />- Records indicate the decision not to enforce federal respirator requirements was made as a policy choice.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913668</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913668/0006.mp3" length="13602752" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A mayor and the EPA declared Lower Manhattan's air "safe" days after 9/11, sending workers back into a toxic cloud - how did that expose them?&#13;
&#13;
The mayor's "air is safe" pronouncement sent workers back into the toxic pile&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A mayor and the EPA declared Lower Manhattan's air "safe" days after 9/11, sending workers back into a toxic cloud - how did that expose them?<br /><br />The mayor's "air is safe" pronouncement sent workers back into the toxic pile<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the public statements, internal records, and on-the-ground choices that shaped who returned to Ground Zero and why. We ask how early assurances about air quality influenced rescue, recovery, and daily life amid smoldering fires.<br /><br />Person: Mayor Rudy Giuliani<br />Person: EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman<br />Event: Public assurances that "the air is safe"<br />Location: Lower Manhattan, World Trade Center site<br />Period: September-December 2001<br /><br />- Thousands of rescue workers, construction crews, and volunteers labored long shifts on a rubble pile that smoldered for three months.<br />- Air samples later showed over 2,500 contaminants including asbestos, lead, dioxins, and carbon nanotubes.<br />- Respirators designed for fine particulates were rarely used; many wore inadequate masks or none at all.<br />- Press conferences and press releases declared the air safe within days, before full contaminant counts were complete.<br />- Records indicate the decision not to enforce federal respirator requirements was made as a policy choice.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>851</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sealed Container That Revealed Alder Hey's Theft</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sealed-container-that-revealed-alder-hey-s-theft--74913667</link><description><![CDATA[A warehouse worker in Halifax opens a sealed container and finds an eight-year-old’s organs-how did Alder Hey’s practices send them across an ocean?<br /><br />The Sealed Container That Revealed Alder Hey's Theft<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events that connected a sealed container in Halifax to practices at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital and the wider NHS. We trace the people, dates, and institutional choices that let organs be retained without consent and ask how such a breach of trust persisted for years.<br /><br />Person: Dick van Velzen<br />Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia<br />Date: September 2000<br />Institution: Alder Hey Children’s Hospital<br />Report: Redfern Report (30 September 2001)<br /><br />- A worker at a rented Halifax warehouse opened a sealed container in September 2000 and found heat-sealed plastic bags of human organs from an eight-year-old girl.<br />- Between 1988 and 1995, pathologist Dick van Velzen held the chair of fetal and infant pathology at Alder Hey and had institutional authority with little meaningful supervision.<br />- When van Velzen left Alder Hey in December 1995 he took medical records and left behind over two thousand storage containers holding organs from approximately 850 infants and 1,500 foetuses.<br />- The Redfern Report documented that retention without consent was widespread across British medicine, revealing more than 100,000 organs and body parts across 210 NHS facilities and 480,600 tissue samples.<br />- The discovery that forced Alder Hey into public inquiry began with mother Helen Rickard and the death of her daughter Samantha in 1992, a thread that led investigators beyond Bristol to Liverpool and Halifax.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913667</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913667/0005.mp3" length="17242759" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A warehouse worker in Halifax opens a sealed container and finds an eight-year-old’s organs-how did Alder Hey’s practices send them across an ocean?&#13;
&#13;
The Sealed Container That Revealed Alder Hey's Theft&#13;
&#13;
In this episode, we lay out the sequence of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A warehouse worker in Halifax opens a sealed container and finds an eight-year-old’s organs-how did Alder Hey’s practices send them across an ocean?<br /><br />The Sealed Container That Revealed Alder Hey's Theft<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events that connected a sealed container in Halifax to practices at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital and the wider NHS. We trace the people, dates, and institutional choices that let organs be retained without consent and ask how such a breach of trust persisted for years.<br /><br />Person: Dick van Velzen<br />Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia<br />Date: September 2000<br />Institution: Alder Hey Children’s Hospital<br />Report: Redfern Report (30 September 2001)<br /><br />- A worker at a rented Halifax warehouse opened a sealed container in September 2000 and found heat-sealed plastic bags of human organs from an eight-year-old girl.<br />- Between 1988 and 1995, pathologist Dick van Velzen held the chair of fetal and infant pathology at Alder Hey and had institutional authority with little meaningful supervision.<br />- When van Velzen left Alder Hey in December 1995 he took medical records and left behind over two thousand storage containers holding organs from approximately 850 infants and 1,500 foetuses.<br />- The Redfern Report documented that retention without consent was widespread across British medicine, revealing more than 100,000 organs and body parts across 210 NHS facilities and 480,600 tissue samples.<br />- The discovery that forced Alder Hey into public inquiry began with mother Helen Rickard and the death of her daughter Samantha in 1992, a thread that led investigators beyond Bristol to Liverpool and Halifax.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1078</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bound and Silent: How Five Restraints Ended Kelly Savage's Life</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bound-and-silent-how-five-restraints-ended-kelly-savage-s-life--74913664</link><description><![CDATA[A 27-year-old teacher arrives at a Kanagawa hospital and is strapped with five restraints-how did that expose what happened next?<br /><br />Bound and Silent: How Five Restraints Ended Kelly Savage's Life<br /><br />In this episode we present the documented timeline around Kelly Savage’s April 30, 2017 admission to Yamato Hospital and the decisions made while he was restrained. We trace his background, the hospital records’ contradictions, and the gaps during Golden Week that left his family asking unanswered questions.<br /><br />Person: Kelly Robert Savage<br />Date: April 30, 2017<br />Location: Yamato Hospital, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan<br />Age: 27<br />Event: Five restraints applied at admission<br /><br />- Arrived involuntarily and had both wrists, both ankles, and his waist secured within minutes of intake<br />- Hospital intake records alternate between describing him as calm and justifying restraints in the same file<br />- He had a history: a 2012 psychotic episode, recovered, graduated in 2015 with degrees in psychology and Japanese<br />- Family visits were denied during Golden Week (May 3-7) with staffing cited as the reason<br />- A cardiologist later noted ten days of immobility create conditions for a blood clot to travel to the lungs<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913664</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913664/0004.mp3" length="15811249" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A 27-year-old teacher arrives at a Kanagawa hospital and is strapped with five restraints-how did that expose what happened next?&#13;
&#13;
Bound and Silent: How Five Restraints Ended Kelly Savage's Life&#13;
&#13;
In this episode we present the documented timeline...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A 27-year-old teacher arrives at a Kanagawa hospital and is strapped with five restraints-how did that expose what happened next?<br /><br />Bound and Silent: How Five Restraints Ended Kelly Savage's Life<br /><br />In this episode we present the documented timeline around Kelly Savage’s April 30, 2017 admission to Yamato Hospital and the decisions made while he was restrained. We trace his background, the hospital records’ contradictions, and the gaps during Golden Week that left his family asking unanswered questions.<br /><br />Person: Kelly Robert Savage<br />Date: April 30, 2017<br />Location: Yamato Hospital, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan<br />Age: 27<br />Event: Five restraints applied at admission<br /><br />- Arrived involuntarily and had both wrists, both ankles, and his waist secured within minutes of intake<br />- Hospital intake records alternate between describing him as calm and justifying restraints in the same file<br />- He had a history: a 2012 psychotic episode, recovered, graduated in 2015 with degrees in psychology and Japanese<br />- Family visits were denied during Golden Week (May 3-7) with staffing cited as the reason<br />- A cardiologist later noted ten days of immobility create conditions for a blood clot to travel to the lungs<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>989</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Silent Carrier: When 83% of a Species Vanished</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-silent-carrier-when-83-of-a-species-vanished--74913662</link><description><![CDATA[The Silent Carrier: When 83% of a Species Vanished<br /><br />Imagine a pathogen so genetically alien it barely registers as related to anything known, yet it wiped out 83% of a titi monkey colony and can infect humans. What happens when a silent carrier unleashes a disease that defies scientific understanding?<br /><br />In this episode, we explore the terrifying reality of cross-species transmission, also known as a host jump or spillover, and the historical record of epidemics that have reshaped human civilization. We uncover the unsettling truth that the boundary between animal and human disease is not a wall, but a membrane under increasing pressure.<br /><br />Case: Titi monkey adenovirus (TMAdV)<br />Organism: Titi monkeys<br />Fatality Rate: 83%<br />Genetic Similarity: Less than 57% to any known adenovirus<br />Mechanism: Cross-species transmission<br /><br />- A pathogen with less than 57% genetic similarity to any known adenovirus caused an 83% fatality rate in a titi monkey colony.<br />- Researchers confirmed this highly divergent virus was capable of spreading through human hosts.<br />- One documented case of cross-species transmission occurred from Whiteleg shrimp (Arthropoda) to a human host.<br />- Most zoonotic diseases originate from mammals or birds due to shared immunological architecture and phylogenetic proximity.<br />- The sequence of cross-species transmission involves five steps: contact, infection of an index case, amplification, potential outbreak, and adaptation (host shifting event).<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913662</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:44:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913662/0003.mp3" length="12237280" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Silent Carrier: When 83% of a Species Vanished&#13;
&#13;
Imagine a pathogen so genetically alien it barely registers as related to anything known, yet it wiped out 83% of a titi monkey colony and can infect humans. What happens when a silent carrier...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Silent Carrier: When 83% of a Species Vanished<br /><br />Imagine a pathogen so genetically alien it barely registers as related to anything known, yet it wiped out 83% of a titi monkey colony and can infect humans. What happens when a silent carrier unleashes a disease that defies scientific understanding?<br /><br />In this episode, we explore the terrifying reality of cross-species transmission, also known as a host jump or spillover, and the historical record of epidemics that have reshaped human civilization. We uncover the unsettling truth that the boundary between animal and human disease is not a wall, but a membrane under increasing pressure.<br /><br />Case: Titi monkey adenovirus (TMAdV)<br />Organism: Titi monkeys<br />Fatality Rate: 83%<br />Genetic Similarity: Less than 57% to any known adenovirus<br />Mechanism: Cross-species transmission<br /><br />- A pathogen with less than 57% genetic similarity to any known adenovirus caused an 83% fatality rate in a titi monkey colony.<br />- Researchers confirmed this highly divergent virus was capable of spreading through human hosts.<br />- One documented case of cross-species transmission occurred from Whiteleg shrimp (Arthropoda) to a human host.<br />- Most zoonotic diseases originate from mammals or birds due to shared immunological architecture and phylogenetic proximity.<br />- The sequence of cross-species transmission involves five steps: contact, infection of an index case, amplification, potential outbreak, and adaptation (host shifting event).<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>765</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Disease X: The Nameless Killer WHO Knew Was Coming</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/disease-x-the-nameless-killer-who-knew-was-coming--74913659</link><description><![CDATA[a word that didn't exist becomes a door.) → OPENING<br /><br />Imagine a world where a medical term, unheard of in 1973, exploded into a recognized discipline with journals, conferences, and federal funding within six years. This rapid emergence wasn't accidental; it was driven by a critical failure in existing medical models that left patients suffering and dying. How did "behavioral medicine" go from an unknown phrase to a global phenomenon so quickly?<br /><br />In this episode, we explore the surprising origin and swift rise of behavioral medicine, a field that emerged to address the critical gaps in the biomedical model of the mid-20th century. We uncover the clinical realities that necessitated this new approach and the key figures who championed its development.<br /><br />Person: Lee Birk<br />Date: 1973<br />Book: Biofeedback: Behavioral Medicine<br />Model: Biomedical model<br />Location: North America<br /><br />- In 1973, Lee Birk published Biofeedback: Behavioral Medicine, using a phrase that did not yet name an established field.<br />- The biomedical model, dominant in the mid-20th century, focused on biological deviations but was incomplete in addressing behavioral causes of illness.<br />- In 1973, Ovide F. Pomerleau and John Paul Brady founded the Center for Behavioral Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.<br />- In 1974, William Stewart Agras established the Laboratory for the Study of Behavioral Medicine at Stanford University.<br />- In 1976, the National Institutes of Health created the Behavioral Medicine Study Section, providing federal funding for the field.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913659</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:44:51 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913659/0002.mp3" length="13191481" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>a word that didn't exist becomes a door.) → OPENING&#13;
&#13;
Imagine a world where a medical term, unheard of in 1973, exploded into a recognized discipline with journals, conferences, and federal funding within six years. This rapid emergence wasn't...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[a word that didn't exist becomes a door.) → OPENING<br /><br />Imagine a world where a medical term, unheard of in 1973, exploded into a recognized discipline with journals, conferences, and federal funding within six years. This rapid emergence wasn't accidental; it was driven by a critical failure in existing medical models that left patients suffering and dying. How did "behavioral medicine" go from an unknown phrase to a global phenomenon so quickly?<br /><br />In this episode, we explore the surprising origin and swift rise of behavioral medicine, a field that emerged to address the critical gaps in the biomedical model of the mid-20th century. We uncover the clinical realities that necessitated this new approach and the key figures who championed its development.<br /><br />Person: Lee Birk<br />Date: 1973<br />Book: Biofeedback: Behavioral Medicine<br />Model: Biomedical model<br />Location: North America<br /><br />- In 1973, Lee Birk published Biofeedback: Behavioral Medicine, using a phrase that did not yet name an established field.<br />- The biomedical model, dominant in the mid-20th century, focused on biological deviations but was incomplete in addressing behavioral causes of illness.<br />- In 1973, Ovide F. Pomerleau and John Paul Brady founded the Center for Behavioral Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.<br />- In 1974, William Stewart Agras established the Laboratory for the Study of Behavioral Medicine at Stanford University.<br />- In 1976, the National Institutes of Health created the Behavioral Medicine Study Section, providing federal funding for the field.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>825</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>a word that didn't exist becomes a door.) → OPENING</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-word-that-didn-t-exist-becomes-a-door-opening--74913656</link><description><![CDATA[Disease X: The Nameless Killer WHO Knew Was Coming<br /><br />Imagine a global health organization adding a disease to its top priority list with no pathogen, no symptoms, and no name. In 2018, the World Health Organization did just that, listing "Disease X" as a potential mass-death event. How could medical science prepare for a killer that didn't yet exist?<br /><br />In this episode, we explore the unprecedented decision by the WHO to include an unknown threat on its list of most dangerous diseases. This move challenged two centuries of medical practice and was a direct response to the devastating 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa.<br /><br />Event: WHO adds Disease X to priority list<br />Date: February 2018<br />Origin of concept: 2014 West African Ebola epidemic<br />Group: WHO R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group<br />Year established: 2015<br /><br />- In February 2018, the WHO added "Disease X" to its official priority list of dangerous diseases.<br />- The 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa killed over 11,000 people.<br />- John-Arne Røttingen argued that the most catastrophic outbreaks are those no list anticipated.<br />- The R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group was established in May 2015.<br />- The group's mandate was to maintain a short annual list of pathogens posing serious epidemic risk.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74913656</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 23:44:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74913656/0001.mp3" length="12447513" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Disease X: The Nameless Killer WHO Knew Was Coming&#13;
&#13;
Imagine a global health organization adding a disease to its top priority list with no pathogen, no symptoms, and no name. In 2018, the World Health Organization did just that, listing "Disease X"...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Disease X: The Nameless Killer WHO Knew Was Coming<br /><br />Imagine a global health organization adding a disease to its top priority list with no pathogen, no symptoms, and no name. In 2018, the World Health Organization did just that, listing "Disease X" as a potential mass-death event. How could medical science prepare for a killer that didn't yet exist?<br /><br />In this episode, we explore the unprecedented decision by the WHO to include an unknown threat on its list of most dangerous diseases. This move challenged two centuries of medical practice and was a direct response to the devastating 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa.<br /><br />Event: WHO adds Disease X to priority list<br />Date: February 2018<br />Origin of concept: 2014 West African Ebola epidemic<br />Group: WHO R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group<br />Year established: 2015<br /><br />- In February 2018, the WHO added "Disease X" to its official priority list of dangerous diseases.<br />- The 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa killed over 11,000 people.<br />- John-Arne Røttingen argued that the most catastrophic outbreaks are those no list anticipated.<br />- The R&D Blueprint Scientific Advisory Group was established in May 2015.<br />- The group's mandate was to maintain a short annual list of pathogens posing serious epidemic risk.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>778</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/45678591538ea440da8a4414ba806962.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>
