<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Legal Cases</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/legal-cases--7200499</link><description><![CDATA[Unravel the truth behind the most compelling legal cases that shaped history and redefined justice. Legal cases brings you an in-depth exploration of the courtroom dramas, groundbreaking verdicts, and the human stories at their core.<br /><br /> From shocking criminal trials to landmark civil disputes, we meticulously dissect each case, examining the evidence, legal strategies, and the societal impact of every decision. We go beyond the headlines to reveal the intricate details and the often-surprising twists that define these pivotal moments in legal history. Discover the fascinating interplay of law, human nature, and the pursuit of justice.<br /><br /> New episodes are published daily, Monday through Sunday, at 7:00 PM, offering a consistent deep dive into a new case or a critical aspect of legal proceedings. Each installment provides a comprehensive narrative, ensuring you understand the full scope and significance of every legal battle.<br /><br /> Legal cases is for anyone fascinated by the intricacies of the justice system, true crime enthusiasts, and those who seek to understand how legal precedents are set. If you're captivated by courtroom drama, legal analysis, and the pursuit of truth, this is your definitive source.<br /><br /> Subscribe now and never miss a verdict.]]></description><atom:link href="https://www.spreaker.com/show/7200499/episodes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language>en</language><category>True Crime</category><copyright>© 2026 OBOMEDIA Creators</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 23:03:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:name><itunes:email>creators@obomedia.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/0d829e8c1f80c11671e3b563ac492a69.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Unravel the truth behind the most compelling legal cases that shaped history and redefined justice. Legal cases brings you an in-depth exploration of the courtroom dramas, groundbreaking verdicts, and the human stories at their core.

From shocking...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Unravel the truth behind the most compelling legal cases that shaped history and redefined justice. Legal cases brings you an in-depth exploration of the courtroom dramas, groundbreaking verdicts, and the human stories at their core.<br /><br /> From shocking criminal trials to landmark civil disputes, we meticulously dissect each case, examining the evidence, legal strategies, and the societal impact of every decision. We go beyond the headlines to reveal the intricate details and the often-surprising twists that define these pivotal moments in legal history. Discover the fascinating interplay of law, human nature, and the pursuit of justice.<br /><br /> New episodes are published daily, Monday through Sunday, at 7:00 PM, offering a consistent deep dive into a new case or a critical aspect of legal proceedings. Each installment provides a comprehensive narrative, ensuring you understand the full scope and significance of every legal battle.<br /><br /> Legal cases is for anyone fascinated by the intricacies of the justice system, true crime enthusiasts, and those who seek to understand how legal precedents are set. If you're captivated by courtroom drama, legal analysis, and the pursuit of truth, this is your definitive source.<br /><br /> Subscribe now and never miss a verdict.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:category text="True Crime"/><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><podcast:guid>7dc1ac79-6820-52c2-a59e-ade366e551b7</podcast:guid><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><item><title>The Yellow Gloves on the Railing: How One Fiber Framed a Murder</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-yellow-gloves-on-the-railing-how-one-fiber-framed-a-murder--73131707</link><description><![CDATA[The Yellow Gloves on the Railing: How One Fiber Framed a Murder<br /><br />A pale-yellow knit glove left folded on a reservoir railing became the single piece of evidence that sent a neighbor to trial for murder. The fiber was barely visible, the gloves were dry on the north-end guardrail, and the victim’s routine made her presence there at 6:05 AM no accident - so who actually left the gloves, and why did one fiber nearly seal a conviction?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how a morning run, a routine walk, and a civil dispute converged around one tiny piece of textile evidence. You’ll hear how the glove, an eyewitness photo identification, and a missing receipt shaped a prosecution - and what hidden file finally began to tell a different story.<br /><br />Person: Sandra Pruitt<br />Date: August 9, 2011<br />Location: North-end railing of the reservoir dam, Renner County, Indiana<br />Person: Pamela Foster<br />Event: Arrest on August 22, 2011<br /><br />- The gloves were pale-yellow knit, folded and centered on an aluminum guardrail.<br />- Philip West logged the call about the gloves at 5:53 AM and by 7:15 AM a body was pulled from the shallows.<br />- Sandra Pruitt was sixty-one and had walked the reservoir loop every Tuesday and Thursday for eleven years.<br />- Pamela Foster was arrested thirteen days after the body was found, on August 22, 2011.<br />- Lab analysis found a single pale-yellow fiber on Pruitt’s jacket collar consistent with the gloves on the railing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131707</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131707/0221.mp3" length="18823478" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Yellow Gloves on the Railing: How One Fiber Framed a Murder&#13;
&#13;
A pale-yellow knit glove left folded on a reservoir railing became the single piece of evidence that sent a neighbor to trial for murder. The fiber was barely visible, the gloves were...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Yellow Gloves on the Railing: How One Fiber Framed a Murder<br /><br />A pale-yellow knit glove left folded on a reservoir railing became the single piece of evidence that sent a neighbor to trial for murder. The fiber was barely visible, the gloves were dry on the north-end guardrail, and the victim’s routine made her presence there at 6:05 AM no accident - so who actually left the gloves, and why did one fiber nearly seal a conviction?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how a morning run, a routine walk, and a civil dispute converged around one tiny piece of textile evidence. You’ll hear how the glove, an eyewitness photo identification, and a missing receipt shaped a prosecution - and what hidden file finally began to tell a different story.<br /><br />Person: Sandra Pruitt<br />Date: August 9, 2011<br />Location: North-end railing of the reservoir dam, Renner County, Indiana<br />Person: Pamela Foster<br />Event: Arrest on August 22, 2011<br /><br />- The gloves were pale-yellow knit, folded and centered on an aluminum guardrail.<br />- Philip West logged the call about the gloves at 5:53 AM and by 7:15 AM a body was pulled from the shallows.<br />- Sandra Pruitt was sixty-one and had walked the reservoir loop every Tuesday and Thursday for eleven years.<br />- Pamela Foster was arrested thirteen days after the body was found, on August 22, 2011.<br />- Lab analysis found a single pale-yellow fiber on Pruitt’s jacket collar consistent with the gloves on the railing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1177</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Shoe on the Pad: A Plant, a Plea, or a Frame-Up?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-shoe-on-the-pad-a-plant-a-plea-or-a-frame-up--73131706</link><description><![CDATA[The Shoe on the Pad: A Plant, a Plea, or a Frame-Up?<br /><br />A single cream-colored women's dress shoe, size seven, was found perfectly upright on a concrete meter pad with a dry folded scrap bearing Sandra Pruitt's Ohio driver's license number tucked inside - dry despite overnight dew on surrounding surfaces. Who deliberately placed that shoe, with information not publicly available, and why did it become the hinge on which two trials turned?<br /><br />In this episode, we present the sequence of events from Sandra Pruitt's disappearance through the discovery of the shoe and the investigative details that followed, focusing on the item that shifted the case's direction: was it a planted piece of evidence or a deliberate signal that pointed to someone with access to restricted information?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Pruitt<br />Date: July 14, 2009<br />Location: 14 Fenwick Court<br />Status: Missing (last seen July 9, 2009)<br />Investigator: Detective Aaron Speight<br /><br />- Shoe found upright on a concrete meter pad at 14 Fenwick Court on the morning of July 14, 2009.<br />- Inside the shoe was a dry folded paper with seven block-capital letters/digits matching Sandra Pruitt's Ohio driver's license number.<br />- Sandra Pruitt had been missing for four days when the shoe was discovered; her last outgoing call was July 9, 2009 at 7:48 p.m.<br />- Sandra's apartment showed no signs of struggle; keys were on the counter, purse on the couch, and the sliding balcony door was open three inches.<br />- The Fenwick Court front gate spring was functional on July 7 but was found two inches open on July 14.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131706</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131706/0220.mp3" length="17140357" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Shoe on the Pad: A Plant, a Plea, or a Frame-Up?&#13;
&#13;
A single cream-colored women's dress shoe, size seven, was found perfectly upright on a concrete meter pad with a dry folded scrap bearing Sandra Pruitt's Ohio driver's license number tucked...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Shoe on the Pad: A Plant, a Plea, or a Frame-Up?<br /><br />A single cream-colored women's dress shoe, size seven, was found perfectly upright on a concrete meter pad with a dry folded scrap bearing Sandra Pruitt's Ohio driver's license number tucked inside - dry despite overnight dew on surrounding surfaces. Who deliberately placed that shoe, with information not publicly available, and why did it become the hinge on which two trials turned?<br /><br />In this episode, we present the sequence of events from Sandra Pruitt's disappearance through the discovery of the shoe and the investigative details that followed, focusing on the item that shifted the case's direction: was it a planted piece of evidence or a deliberate signal that pointed to someone with access to restricted information?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Pruitt<br />Date: July 14, 2009<br />Location: 14 Fenwick Court<br />Status: Missing (last seen July 9, 2009)<br />Investigator: Detective Aaron Speight<br /><br />- Shoe found upright on a concrete meter pad at 14 Fenwick Court on the morning of July 14, 2009.<br />- Inside the shoe was a dry folded paper with seven block-capital letters/digits matching Sandra Pruitt's Ohio driver's license number.<br />- Sandra Pruitt had been missing for four days when the shoe was discovered; her last outgoing call was July 9, 2009 at 7:48 p.m.<br />- Sandra's apartment showed no signs of struggle; keys were on the counter, purse on the couch, and the sliding balcony door was open three inches.<br />- The Fenwick Court front gate spring was functional on July 7 but was found two inches open on July 14.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1072</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Timestamp Lie That Tried to Free a Killer</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-timestamp-lie-that-tried-to-free-a-killer--73131702</link><description><![CDATA[The Timestamp Lie That Tried to Free a Killer<br /><br />A single date stamped June 9 on a drugstore photo threatened to erase a coroner's timeline that placed Loretta Voss dead on June 7 - and that one incorrect number became the fragile hinge between a killer and freedom. Who put the staged photograph in her unlocked garden shed, and could that tiny falsified timestamp have actually worked?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from Loretta's daily routines to the discovery of her body and the discovery of the photograph that contradicted the coroner's findings, asking whether the photo was meant to mislead investigators or to conceal something deeper.<br /><br />Person: Loretta Voss<br />Date: June 7, 2014 (time of death window)<br />Location: Pemberton Street, Harwick, Pennsylvania<br />Person: Neil Perry<br />Item: 4x6 drugstore photograph dated June 9, 2014<br /><br />- Loretta Voss, age 72, was found dead of asphyxiation in her kitchen on June 11, 2014.<br />- The coroner placed her time of death between 9:00 PM on June 7 and the early hours of June 8, 2014.<br />- A 4x6 photograph stamped June 9, 2014 was found tucked in Loretta's garden shed on June 11 by volunteer Erin Myers.<br />- Loretta's Canon PowerShot contained 32 images, 31 with accurate date stamps and 1 with an incorrect stamp matching the print.<br />- Neil Perry, age 49, admitted to repeatedly driving past Loretta's house and had performed two prior service calls at her home (2010 and 2012).<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131702</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131702/0219.mp3" length="18768308" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Timestamp Lie That Tried to Free a Killer&#13;
&#13;
A single date stamped June 9 on a drugstore photo threatened to erase a coroner's timeline that placed Loretta Voss dead on June 7 - and that one incorrect number became the fragile hinge between a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Timestamp Lie That Tried to Free a Killer<br /><br />A single date stamped June 9 on a drugstore photo threatened to erase a coroner's timeline that placed Loretta Voss dead on June 7 - and that one incorrect number became the fragile hinge between a killer and freedom. Who put the staged photograph in her unlocked garden shed, and could that tiny falsified timestamp have actually worked?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from Loretta's daily routines to the discovery of her body and the discovery of the photograph that contradicted the coroner's findings, asking whether the photo was meant to mislead investigators or to conceal something deeper.<br /><br />Person: Loretta Voss<br />Date: June 7, 2014 (time of death window)<br />Location: Pemberton Street, Harwick, Pennsylvania<br />Person: Neil Perry<br />Item: 4x6 drugstore photograph dated June 9, 2014<br /><br />- Loretta Voss, age 72, was found dead of asphyxiation in her kitchen on June 11, 2014.<br />- The coroner placed her time of death between 9:00 PM on June 7 and the early hours of June 8, 2014.<br />- A 4x6 photograph stamped June 9, 2014 was found tucked in Loretta's garden shed on June 11 by volunteer Erin Myers.<br />- Loretta's Canon PowerShot contained 32 images, 31 with accurate date stamps and 1 with an incorrect stamp matching the print.<br />- Neil Perry, age 49, admitted to repeatedly driving past Loretta's house and had performed two prior service calls at her home (2010 and 2012).<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1173</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Mug, the Map, and the Man Who Walked Free</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-mug-the-map-and-the-man-who-walked-free--73131701</link><description><![CDATA[The Mug, the Map, and the Man Who Walked Free<br /><br />A white ceramic mug with three ounces of coffee was found twelve feet inside a drainage easement-at a spot most neighbors did not even know existed-and that single misplaced object became the hinge of a criminal trial. How did a mug that did not belong to the missing woman survive tampering, reappear as an X on a hand-drawn map, and help produce a confession that arrived minutes after arrest?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a disappearance to a surprise recovery and the legal unraveling that followed, covering the discovery, the confession, and the evidence chain that nearly disappeared-what does that X on a water-stained notebook page finally prove?<br /><br />Date: May 9, 2014<br />Person: Laura Beckett<br />Location: Carvell Woods drainage easement<br />Case: Abduction and recovery<br />Person: Dennis Taylor<br /><br />- A white ceramic mug with a blue flower rim pattern contained three ounces of coffee when found.<br />- Laura Beckett was missing for seven days and was found May 14, 2014, severely dehydrated with ligature marks on both wrists.<br />- Mark York found a wine-colored leather wallet and the mug while walking his dog along the treeline.<br />- Surveillance captured a white Chevrolet cargo van with ClearFlow Home Services signage in a Vine Street lot at 7:42 AM on May 7, registered to Dennis Taylor.<br />- Officer Brian Cahill spoke with Dennis Taylor four minutes into custody, without a lawyer or Miranda warning, and Taylor admitted to the abduction and to placing the mug.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131701</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131701/0218.mp3" length="19648112" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Mug, the Map, and the Man Who Walked Free&#13;
&#13;
A white ceramic mug with three ounces of coffee was found twelve feet inside a drainage easement-at a spot most neighbors did not even know existed-and that single misplaced object became the hinge of a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Mug, the Map, and the Man Who Walked Free<br /><br />A white ceramic mug with three ounces of coffee was found twelve feet inside a drainage easement-at a spot most neighbors did not even know existed-and that single misplaced object became the hinge of a criminal trial. How did a mug that did not belong to the missing woman survive tampering, reappear as an X on a hand-drawn map, and help produce a confession that arrived minutes after arrest?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a disappearance to a surprise recovery and the legal unraveling that followed, covering the discovery, the confession, and the evidence chain that nearly disappeared-what does that X on a water-stained notebook page finally prove?<br /><br />Date: May 9, 2014<br />Person: Laura Beckett<br />Location: Carvell Woods drainage easement<br />Case: Abduction and recovery<br />Person: Dennis Taylor<br /><br />- A white ceramic mug with a blue flower rim pattern contained three ounces of coffee when found.<br />- Laura Beckett was missing for seven days and was found May 14, 2014, severely dehydrated with ligature marks on both wrists.<br />- Mark York found a wine-colored leather wallet and the mug while walking his dog along the treeline.<br />- Surveillance captured a white Chevrolet cargo van with ClearFlow Home Services signage in a Vine Street lot at 7:42 AM on May 7, registered to Dennis Taylor.<br />- Officer Brian Cahill spoke with Dennis Taylor four minutes into custody, without a lawyer or Miranda warning, and Taylor admitted to the abduction and to placing the mug.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1228</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Creek's Secret Shoe: Why Wagner Confessed But Stayed Convicted</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-creek-s-secret-shoe-why-wagner-confessed-but-stayed-convicted--73131698</link><description><![CDATA[The Creek's Secret Shoe: Why Wagner Confessed But Stayed Convicted<br /><br />A sixteen-gallon plastic storage bin weighted with a concrete block and sealed with clear packing tape was pulled from Peller Creek at 6:42 a.m. in April 2014 containing a single size eight black leather pump with its heel snapped off and a water-damaged spiral notebook whose last grocery list ends with "almonds" and a hand-drawn star - but no body. Who packed Angela Bowers’s cardigan, notebook, prescription bottle and lone shoe into that bin, and why would a recorded confession later change nothing about the conviction?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the physical evidence recovered from the creek and Elden Place, the routine of the missing woman, and the connections investigators traced to a maintenance contractor; what do these objects and the recorded statements really tell us about what happened to Angela Bowers?<br /><br />Person: Angela Bowers<br />Date: April 1-2, 2014<br />Location: Peller Creek; Elden Place (second-floor apartment)<br />Item: sixteen-gallon plastic storage bin sealed with clear packing tape and weighted with a concrete block<br />Witness: Tamara Bowers (identified the shoe from a photograph)<br /><br />- The bin was pulled from Peller Creek by Lori Ford at 6:42 a.m, on a Tuesday in April 2014.<br />- Inside the bin were one black leather pump size 8 with its heel snapped off, a water-damaged spiral notebook, and a dark green wool cardigan with two buttons missing.<br />- The notebook’s last grocery list ends with the word "almonds" followed by a small hand-drawn star.<br />- Angela’s dark blue 2005 Honda Civic was found locked with engine cold in the Hargrove Street grocery lot the night she was reported missing.<br />- Building manager Douglas Petit had hired Jason Wagner 14 months earlier; maintenance logs showed six visits in the month before Angela’s disappearance that Wagner had not recorded.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131698</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131698/0217.mp3" length="15597669" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Creek's Secret Shoe: Why Wagner Confessed But Stayed Convicted&#13;
&#13;
A sixteen-gallon plastic storage bin weighted with a concrete block and sealed with clear packing tape was pulled from Peller Creek at 6:42 a.m. in April 2014 containing a single...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Creek's Secret Shoe: Why Wagner Confessed But Stayed Convicted<br /><br />A sixteen-gallon plastic storage bin weighted with a concrete block and sealed with clear packing tape was pulled from Peller Creek at 6:42 a.m. in April 2014 containing a single size eight black leather pump with its heel snapped off and a water-damaged spiral notebook whose last grocery list ends with "almonds" and a hand-drawn star - but no body. Who packed Angela Bowers’s cardigan, notebook, prescription bottle and lone shoe into that bin, and why would a recorded confession later change nothing about the conviction?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the physical evidence recovered from the creek and Elden Place, the routine of the missing woman, and the connections investigators traced to a maintenance contractor; what do these objects and the recorded statements really tell us about what happened to Angela Bowers?<br /><br />Person: Angela Bowers<br />Date: April 1-2, 2014<br />Location: Peller Creek; Elden Place (second-floor apartment)<br />Item: sixteen-gallon plastic storage bin sealed with clear packing tape and weighted with a concrete block<br />Witness: Tamara Bowers (identified the shoe from a photograph)<br /><br />- The bin was pulled from Peller Creek by Lori Ford at 6:42 a.m, on a Tuesday in April 2014.<br />- Inside the bin were one black leather pump size 8 with its heel snapped off, a water-damaged spiral notebook, and a dark green wool cardigan with two buttons missing.<br />- The notebook’s last grocery list ends with the word "almonds" followed by a small hand-drawn star.<br />- Angela’s dark blue 2005 Honda Civic was found locked with engine cold in the Hargrove Street grocery lot the night she was reported missing.<br />- Building manager Douglas Petit had hired Jason Wagner 14 months earlier; maintenance logs showed six visits in the month before Angela’s disappearance that Wagner had not recorded.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>975</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Oak Tree Jury Card That Freed a Wrongfully Convicted Wife</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-oak-tree-jury-card-that-freed-a-wrongfully-convicted-wife--73131695</link><description><![CDATA[The Oak Tree Jury Card That Freed a Wrongfully Convicted Wife<br /><br />The discovery of a laminated jury instruction card lodged nine feet up in an oak tree changed everything: it had survived two winters and proved to be jury instruction number seven on premeditation-the single document a foreperson took from the jury room after a guilty verdict. How did a card hidden on a road Alice Hayes walked daily overturn a life sentence and expose a false eyewitness?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from the March 2011 disappearance and death to the 2019 discovery on Eckert Farm Road, tracing how physical evidence, witness statements, and procedural choices intersected to create a wrongful conviction-and then unravel it. What links a small-town route, a storm drain handle, and a removed jury card?<br /><br />Person: Alice Hayes<br />Person: Thomas Hayes<br />Person: Carl Hunt<br />Date: March 8, 2011 (death determined)<br />Date: March 4, 2019 (card found)<br /><br />- The laminated card was lodged nine feet above the ground in the split trunk of an oak tree on Eckert Farm Road.<br />- The discovered card was labeled jury instruction number seven, covering the premeditation standard.<br />- Alice Hayes was 43 years old in spring 2011 and worked eleven years at the side-street dental office.<br />- The household maul used to kill Thomas Hayes had its original handle missing; a replacement handle was in the garage.<br />- Carl Hunt reported seeing Alice at approximately 11:00 PM on March 8, 2011, from roughly sixty feet away through a partly obscured view.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131695</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131695/0216.mp3" length="19658979" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Oak Tree Jury Card That Freed a Wrongfully Convicted Wife&#13;
&#13;
The discovery of a laminated jury instruction card lodged nine feet up in an oak tree changed everything: it had survived two winters and proved to be jury instruction number seven on...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Oak Tree Jury Card That Freed a Wrongfully Convicted Wife<br /><br />The discovery of a laminated jury instruction card lodged nine feet up in an oak tree changed everything: it had survived two winters and proved to be jury instruction number seven on premeditation-the single document a foreperson took from the jury room after a guilty verdict. How did a card hidden on a road Alice Hayes walked daily overturn a life sentence and expose a false eyewitness?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from the March 2011 disappearance and death to the 2019 discovery on Eckert Farm Road, tracing how physical evidence, witness statements, and procedural choices intersected to create a wrongful conviction-and then unravel it. What links a small-town route, a storm drain handle, and a removed jury card?<br /><br />Person: Alice Hayes<br />Person: Thomas Hayes<br />Person: Carl Hunt<br />Date: March 8, 2011 (death determined)<br />Date: March 4, 2019 (card found)<br /><br />- The laminated card was lodged nine feet above the ground in the split trunk of an oak tree on Eckert Farm Road.<br />- The discovered card was labeled jury instruction number seven, covering the premeditation standard.<br />- Alice Hayes was 43 years old in spring 2011 and worked eleven years at the side-street dental office.<br />- The household maul used to kill Thomas Hayes had its original handle missing; a replacement handle was in the garage.<br />- Carl Hunt reported seeing Alice at approximately 11:00 PM on March 8, 2011, from roughly sixty feet away through a partly obscured view.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1229</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Watch That Sent One Woman Free-and Another to Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-watch-that-sent-one-woman-free-and-another-to-prison--73131694</link><description><![CDATA[The Watch That Sent One Woman Free-and Another to Prison<br /><br />Fear of a hidden error: a running wristwatch engraved "For Mara always" was found face up on a septic tank deflector three weeks after the tank was pumped dry-an object that toppled one prosecution and built another. Who placed the watch inside the tank after service, and was it a deliberate act or a single mistake that ruined lives?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story as the evidence unfolded: the discovery of the watch, the connection to twenty-six-year-old Mara Elgin, and how that solitary item shifted the course of investigations and trials. What does a single object reveal about who was with Mara, and who was lying?<br /><br />Person: Mara Elgin<br />Date: December 28, 2016 (last contact)<br />Location: Sutter Fork Lane (room rented from Eugene Simpson)<br />Event: Watch found on deflector lip of septic tank on a February morning, 2017<br />Person: Eugene Simpson<br /><br />- The watch's face read 7:44 and its second hand was still moving when Wendy Carlson found it.<br />- The watch was twenty-two millimeters wide and engraved with four words: "For Mara always."<br />- Verdant Drain Service pumped and fully vacated the septic tank on January 17, 2017, per a receipt signed by Eugene Simpson.<br />- Mara Elgin was twenty-six years old, had last texted on December 28, 2016, and was reported missing by her family six weeks later.<br />- Phone records show Mara and Julie Turner exchanged fourteen calls in the six weeks before Mara's disappearance.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131694</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131694/0215.mp3" length="18533833" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Watch That Sent One Woman Free-and Another to Prison&#13;
&#13;
Fear of a hidden error: a running wristwatch engraved "For Mara always" was found face up on a septic tank deflector three weeks after the tank was pumped dry-an object that toppled one...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Watch That Sent One Woman Free-and Another to Prison<br /><br />Fear of a hidden error: a running wristwatch engraved "For Mara always" was found face up on a septic tank deflector three weeks after the tank was pumped dry-an object that toppled one prosecution and built another. Who placed the watch inside the tank after service, and was it a deliberate act or a single mistake that ruined lives?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story as the evidence unfolded: the discovery of the watch, the connection to twenty-six-year-old Mara Elgin, and how that solitary item shifted the course of investigations and trials. What does a single object reveal about who was with Mara, and who was lying?<br /><br />Person: Mara Elgin<br />Date: December 28, 2016 (last contact)<br />Location: Sutter Fork Lane (room rented from Eugene Simpson)<br />Event: Watch found on deflector lip of septic tank on a February morning, 2017<br />Person: Eugene Simpson<br /><br />- The watch's face read 7:44 and its second hand was still moving when Wendy Carlson found it.<br />- The watch was twenty-two millimeters wide and engraved with four words: "For Mara always."<br />- Verdant Drain Service pumped and fully vacated the septic tank on January 17, 2017, per a receipt signed by Eugene Simpson.<br />- Mara Elgin was twenty-six years old, had last texted on December 28, 2016, and was reported missing by her family six weeks later.<br />- Phone records show Mara and Julie Turner exchanged fourteen calls in the six weeks before Mara's disappearance.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1159</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Tote Bag, The Bus Log, and the Man Who Vanished</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-tote-bag-the-bus-log-and-the-man-who-vanished--73131693</link><description><![CDATA[The Tote Bag, The Bus Log, and the Man Who Vanished<br /><br />A woman’s tote bag sat upright in four inches of frozen water with a wallet, library card, license, and keys still inside - and seven days later divers found her body eighteen inches under the ice, thirty yards away. Who left the bag and why did the bus log show a nine-minute delay that let the bus run past her stop?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline and the records around Jennifer Anne Ramsey’s disappearance and the trial that followed, focusing on the overlooked transit entry that may rewrite where she actually was when someone reached her. Could a nine-minute mechanical hold and an unasked bus driver change everything the prosecution relied on?<br /><br />Person: Jennifer Anne Ramsey<br />Date: January 2, 2019 (last seen), January 9, 2019 (discovery)<br />Location: Harlow Pond; 118 Tolland Street, Dellwood<br />Case: Murder trial centered on transit log and bus driver testimony<br />Person: Vernon Vogel<br /><br />- Victim age: 54 years old at time of death.<br />- Tote contents: $43 in cash, a library card, a driver's license, and car keys with a foam fish float.<br />- Timeline gap: Bus delayed at Waverly Avenue for 9 minutes; scheduled arrival at Tolland Street 6:44 PM, actual arrival 6:53 PM.<br />- Body recovery: Located beneath 18 inches of ice, 30 yards from the tote bag, seven days after the bag was photographed.<br />- Suspect history: Vernon Vogel, 41, prior conviction for aggravated stalking in 2012 with 14 months served.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131693</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131693/0214.mp3" length="19314998" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Tote Bag, The Bus Log, and the Man Who Vanished&#13;
&#13;
A woman’s tote bag sat upright in four inches of frozen water with a wallet, library card, license, and keys still inside - and seven days later divers found her body eighteen inches under the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Tote Bag, The Bus Log, and the Man Who Vanished<br /><br />A woman’s tote bag sat upright in four inches of frozen water with a wallet, library card, license, and keys still inside - and seven days later divers found her body eighteen inches under the ice, thirty yards away. Who left the bag and why did the bus log show a nine-minute delay that let the bus run past her stop?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline and the records around Jennifer Anne Ramsey’s disappearance and the trial that followed, focusing on the overlooked transit entry that may rewrite where she actually was when someone reached her. Could a nine-minute mechanical hold and an unasked bus driver change everything the prosecution relied on?<br /><br />Person: Jennifer Anne Ramsey<br />Date: January 2, 2019 (last seen), January 9, 2019 (discovery)<br />Location: Harlow Pond; 118 Tolland Street, Dellwood<br />Case: Murder trial centered on transit log and bus driver testimony<br />Person: Vernon Vogel<br /><br />- Victim age: 54 years old at time of death.<br />- Tote contents: $43 in cash, a library card, a driver's license, and car keys with a foam fish float.<br />- Timeline gap: Bus delayed at Waverly Avenue for 9 minutes; scheduled arrival at Tolland Street 6:44 PM, actual arrival 6:53 PM.<br />- Body recovery: Located beneath 18 inches of ice, 30 yards from the tote bag, seven days after the bag was photographed.<br />- Suspect history: Vernon Vogel, 41, prior conviction for aggravated stalking in 2012 with 14 months served.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1208</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>A Glove Points at the Door: The Murder of Noreen Haskell</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-glove-points-at-the-door-the-murder-of-noreen-haskell--73131692</link><description><![CDATA[A Glove Points at the Door: The Murder of Noreen Haskell<br /><br />A single men's leather work glove cuff-down, fingers pointing at the front door-found at 5:52 a.m. on December 11, 2009-became the crucible of a murder trial. The glove sat atop a half-pint canning jar with partially frozen dark red liquid; who placed it there and why would decide a jury's verdict. What did that deliberate arrangement reveal about the killer and the hours between 9 p.m. and dawn?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline, the household clues, and the witness statements that shaped the case and the trial. You will hear how a paid caller, a broken hasp, and a volunteered confession converged-so what did those precise details prove?<br /><br />Person: Noreen Haskell<br />Date: December 11, 2009<br />Location: 4 Galloway Road<br />Person: Robert Mitchell<br />Person: Curtis Cooper<br /><br />- The glove was found cuff-down with fingers pointing toward the front door at 5:52 a.m.<br />- The jar beneath the glove was a half-pint canning jar containing partially frozen dark red liquid.<br />- Time of death was estimated between 10:00 and 11:00 p.m. the previous evening.<br />- The back storm door had a broken hasp latch and a ceramic pot was used to prop it shut; the pot was found overturned in the mudroom.<br />- Curtis Cooper walked into the sheriff’s office on December 22, 2009, and reported three non-public details: the overturned ceramic pot, a canning jar with dark contents on the counter, and a glove on the porch.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131692</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131692/0213.mp3" length="18745320" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>A Glove Points at the Door: The Murder of Noreen Haskell&#13;
&#13;
A single men's leather work glove cuff-down, fingers pointing at the front door-found at 5:52 a.m. on December 11, 2009-became the crucible of a murder trial. The glove sat atop a half-pint...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[A Glove Points at the Door: The Murder of Noreen Haskell<br /><br />A single men's leather work glove cuff-down, fingers pointing at the front door-found at 5:52 a.m. on December 11, 2009-became the crucible of a murder trial. The glove sat atop a half-pint canning jar with partially frozen dark red liquid; who placed it there and why would decide a jury's verdict. What did that deliberate arrangement reveal about the killer and the hours between 9 p.m. and dawn?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline, the household clues, and the witness statements that shaped the case and the trial. You will hear how a paid caller, a broken hasp, and a volunteered confession converged-so what did those precise details prove?<br /><br />Person: Noreen Haskell<br />Date: December 11, 2009<br />Location: 4 Galloway Road<br />Person: Robert Mitchell<br />Person: Curtis Cooper<br /><br />- The glove was found cuff-down with fingers pointing toward the front door at 5:52 a.m.<br />- The jar beneath the glove was a half-pint canning jar containing partially frozen dark red liquid.<br />- Time of death was estimated between 10:00 and 11:00 p.m. the previous evening.<br />- The back storm door had a broken hasp latch and a ceramic pot was used to prop it shut; the pot was found overturned in the mudroom.<br />- Curtis Cooper walked into the sheriff’s office on December 22, 2009, and reported three non-public details: the overturned ceramic pot, a canning jar with dark contents on the counter, and a glove on the porch.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1172</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Buried Amendment, Burned Barn: The Paper That Proved Arson</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/buried-amendment-burned-barn-the-paper-that-proved-arson--73131691</link><description><![CDATA[Buried Amendment, Burned Barn: The Paper That Proved Arson<br /><br />The smell of charred wood led a county grader to a padlocked aluminum box frozen in a ditch - inside was a single insurance declaration page with a handwritten margin note dated three days before the fire. That paper, forensically linked to an insurance employee, and a mailbox with no delivery confirmation became the thin, combustible thread between an insured barn reduced to ashes and a disputed $412,000 claim - who altered the coverage and why?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of discoveries from the burned ceramics barn to the legal files and the evidence that shifted the case from an insurance dispute to a possible deliberate suppression of coverage. Follow how a handwriting match, timestamps, and a motel receipt raise the question at the heart of the story: was the policy amended before the fire to limit payout, and who benefits from that timing?<br /><br />Person: Cheryl Slater<br />Date: November 5, 2011<br />Location: 4418 Felton Mill Road, Osker Township<br />Claim Amount: $412,000<br />Case: Harlan County Circuit Court docket 2012-CV-0049<br /><br />- The padlocked aluminum box was found nine days after the fire, buried in a ditch culvert with frozen mud packed around it.<br />- The handwritten margin note on the declaration page was dated November 2, 2011, three days before the November 5 barn fire.<br />- Gas chromatography identified charcoal lighter fluid as the accelerant applied at four-to-six-foot intervals along the rear property line.<br />- Cheryl checked into a motel in Dunning at 6:52 PM on November 5, 2011, forty-three miles from her property; the receipt and clerk confirmed her presence.<br />- Meridian Heartland’s filed clause with the state in January 2011 showed full barn contents coverage (~$230,000), while an internal amendment allegedly reduced it to $50,000 with an internal log timestamp of November 2, 2011.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131691</guid><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131691/0212.mp3" length="20611090" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Buried Amendment, Burned Barn: The Paper That Proved Arson&#13;
&#13;
The smell of charred wood led a county grader to a padlocked aluminum box frozen in a ditch - inside was a single insurance declaration page with a handwritten margin note dated three days...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Buried Amendment, Burned Barn: The Paper That Proved Arson<br /><br />The smell of charred wood led a county grader to a padlocked aluminum box frozen in a ditch - inside was a single insurance declaration page with a handwritten margin note dated three days before the fire. That paper, forensically linked to an insurance employee, and a mailbox with no delivery confirmation became the thin, combustible thread between an insured barn reduced to ashes and a disputed $412,000 claim - who altered the coverage and why?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of discoveries from the burned ceramics barn to the legal files and the evidence that shifted the case from an insurance dispute to a possible deliberate suppression of coverage. Follow how a handwriting match, timestamps, and a motel receipt raise the question at the heart of the story: was the policy amended before the fire to limit payout, and who benefits from that timing?<br /><br />Person: Cheryl Slater<br />Date: November 5, 2011<br />Location: 4418 Felton Mill Road, Osker Township<br />Claim Amount: $412,000<br />Case: Harlan County Circuit Court docket 2012-CV-0049<br /><br />- The padlocked aluminum box was found nine days after the fire, buried in a ditch culvert with frozen mud packed around it.<br />- The handwritten margin note on the declaration page was dated November 2, 2011, three days before the November 5 barn fire.<br />- Gas chromatography identified charcoal lighter fluid as the accelerant applied at four-to-six-foot intervals along the rear property line.<br />- Cheryl checked into a motel in Dunning at 6:52 PM on November 5, 2011, forty-three miles from her property; the receipt and clerk confirmed her presence.<br />- Meridian Heartland’s filed clause with the state in January 2011 showed full barn contents coverage (~$230,000), while an internal amendment allegedly reduced it to $50,000 with an internal log timestamp of November 2, 2011.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1289</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Mug on the Gravel: How a Coffee Cup Proved a Murder</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-mug-on-the-gravel-how-a-coffee-cup-proved-a-murder--73131690</link><description><![CDATA[The Mug on the Gravel: How a Coffee Cup Proved a Murder<br /><br />A single ceramic mug, half-full of cold coffee, sat upright in the gravel eighteen feet from a utility pole and forty feet from a house where a sixty-two-year-old woman lay dead. That misplaced cup, photographed by a lineman and later examined by a forensic paralegal, became the pivot that transformed a presumed cardiac death into a homicide-how did a coffee mug connect to digoxin levels over three times the therapeutic ceiling?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from discovery to indictment: the initial scene, the toxicology that changed the cause of death, the phone records and witnesses, and the moment Lloyd Andrews recognized what the step-pegs and the mug meant for the case. How did those details rewrite the investigation into Diane Jones's death?<br /><br />Person: Diane Jones<br />Date: September 30, 2014<br />Location: 4417 Sycamore Terrace, Bitterwood, Tennessee<br />Toxicology result: Digoxin 4.1 ng/mL<br />Suspect call origin: Duane Anderson, September 30, 2014, 11-minute call<br /><br />- Diane Jones was 62 years old and lived alone at 4417 Sycamore Terrace.<br />- Death discovered October 9, 2014 after daughter Sandra Mercer’s unanswered calls beginning October 8.<br />- Diane had been prescribed flecainide for atrial fibrillation for six years and had never been prescribed digoxin.<br />- Toxicology showed digoxin at 4.1 ng/mL, over three times the upper therapeutic boundary of 1.5 ng/mL.<br />- An 11-minute call to Diane’s number originated from Duane Anderson on September 30, 2014.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131690</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131690/0211.mp3" length="20105777" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Mug on the Gravel: How a Coffee Cup Proved a Murder&#13;
&#13;
A single ceramic mug, half-full of cold coffee, sat upright in the gravel eighteen feet from a utility pole and forty feet from a house where a sixty-two-year-old woman lay dead. That...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Mug on the Gravel: How a Coffee Cup Proved a Murder<br /><br />A single ceramic mug, half-full of cold coffee, sat upright in the gravel eighteen feet from a utility pole and forty feet from a house where a sixty-two-year-old woman lay dead. That misplaced cup, photographed by a lineman and later examined by a forensic paralegal, became the pivot that transformed a presumed cardiac death into a homicide-how did a coffee mug connect to digoxin levels over three times the therapeutic ceiling?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from discovery to indictment: the initial scene, the toxicology that changed the cause of death, the phone records and witnesses, and the moment Lloyd Andrews recognized what the step-pegs and the mug meant for the case. How did those details rewrite the investigation into Diane Jones's death?<br /><br />Person: Diane Jones<br />Date: September 30, 2014<br />Location: 4417 Sycamore Terrace, Bitterwood, Tennessee<br />Toxicology result: Digoxin 4.1 ng/mL<br />Suspect call origin: Duane Anderson, September 30, 2014, 11-minute call<br /><br />- Diane Jones was 62 years old and lived alone at 4417 Sycamore Terrace.<br />- Death discovered October 9, 2014 after daughter Sandra Mercer’s unanswered calls beginning October 8.<br />- Diane had been prescribed flecainide for atrial fibrillation for six years and had never been prescribed digoxin.<br />- Toxicology showed digoxin at 4.1 ng/mL, over three times the upper therapeutic boundary of 1.5 ng/mL.<br />- An 11-minute call to Diane’s number originated from Duane Anderson on September 30, 2014.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1257</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Blue Stake That Tried to Steal a 468‑Acre Preserve</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-blue-stake-that-tried-to-steal-a-468-acre-preserve--73131689</link><description><![CDATA[The Blue Stake That Tried to Steal a 468‑Acre Preserve<br /><br />Fear that a single blue stake could erase a public 468‑acre nature preserve started with a laminated deed and an 18‑inch fiberglass rod pinned in a parking lot - and that deed was processed through the county system on a Saturday. How did a forged filing, a scaled survey note in six‑point type, and a part‑time clerk's access nearly transfer Aldercreek Preserve to a shell company?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the events that began at 5:50 a.m. on September 9, 2014 and followed a nine‑day legal scramble to undo a deed; we detail the people, the procedural gaps, and the tiny printed notation that became central to the trial. Could a single oversight in the county land records office really put public land at risk?<br /><br />Person: Karen Farrell<br />Date: September 9, 2014<br />Location: Aldercreek Preserve parking lot<br />Case: nine‑day trial over deed transfer<br />Event: deed filed online on Saturday, September 6, 2014<br /><br />- At 5:50 a.m. on September 9, 2014 Karen Farrell found an 18‑inch blue fiberglass rod with an orange flag and a laminated deed in the Aldercreek Preserve parking lot.<br />- Aldercreek Preserve is a 468‑acre tract whose deed was claimed by an entity named Ridgemont Parcel Holdings.<br />- The survey map commissioned for the false claim was labeled Map 2014‑GC‑0441 and included a 1:2,400 scale notation in six‑point type.<br />- The fraudulent deed filing was processed through the county web portal on Saturday, September 6, 2014 when the records office was closed.<br />- Michael Roberts, a 24‑year‑old part‑time filing assistant hired in early 2014, had accessed parcel records for Aldercreek outside his duties before the scheme was discovered.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131689</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131689/0210.mp3" length="21559857" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Blue Stake That Tried to Steal a 468‑Acre Preserve&#13;
&#13;
Fear that a single blue stake could erase a public 468‑acre nature preserve started with a laminated deed and an 18‑inch fiberglass rod pinned in a parking lot - and that deed was processed...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Blue Stake That Tried to Steal a 468‑Acre Preserve<br /><br />Fear that a single blue stake could erase a public 468‑acre nature preserve started with a laminated deed and an 18‑inch fiberglass rod pinned in a parking lot - and that deed was processed through the county system on a Saturday. How did a forged filing, a scaled survey note in six‑point type, and a part‑time clerk's access nearly transfer Aldercreek Preserve to a shell company?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the events that began at 5:50 a.m. on September 9, 2014 and followed a nine‑day legal scramble to undo a deed; we detail the people, the procedural gaps, and the tiny printed notation that became central to the trial. Could a single oversight in the county land records office really put public land at risk?<br /><br />Person: Karen Farrell<br />Date: September 9, 2014<br />Location: Aldercreek Preserve parking lot<br />Case: nine‑day trial over deed transfer<br />Event: deed filed online on Saturday, September 6, 2014<br /><br />- At 5:50 a.m. on September 9, 2014 Karen Farrell found an 18‑inch blue fiberglass rod with an orange flag and a laminated deed in the Aldercreek Preserve parking lot.<br />- Aldercreek Preserve is a 468‑acre tract whose deed was claimed by an entity named Ridgemont Parcel Holdings.<br />- The survey map commissioned for the false claim was labeled Map 2014‑GC‑0441 and included a 1:2,400 scale notation in six‑point type.<br />- The fraudulent deed filing was processed through the county web portal on Saturday, September 6, 2014 when the records office was closed.<br />- Michael Roberts, a 24‑year‑old part‑time filing assistant hired in early 2014, had accessed parcel records for Aldercreek outside his duties before the scheme was discovered.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1348</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Typewriter Locked in Evidence That Wrote a Ransom Note</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-typewriter-locked-in-evidence-that-wrote-a-ransom-note--73131686</link><description><![CDATA[The Typewriter Locked in Evidence That Wrote a Ransom Note<br /><br />A sealed evidence bin held a Royal Empress typewriter for eight and a half years - and a ransom note demanding $40,000 was later typed on that same machine. How could a note matching a machine never signed out of the Caldwell evidence locker appear in the middle of a child’s disappearance?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the physical details of the typewriter evidence, and the courtroom moments that turned certainty into doubt. What overlooked fact inside the sealed bin ultimately unraveled the prosecution’s case?<br /><br />Person: Iris Fowler<br />Date: August 16, 2011<br />Location: Kettner Avenue; Dunmore Street; Caldwell Public Safety Building evidence locker bin 1142-C<br />Case: Kidnapping and extortion charges filed September 2011 against Cynthia Stewart<br />Item: Royal Empress typewriter serial RE-741-09224, logged February 2003<br /><br />- The ransom note demanded forty thousand dollars and was found August 18, 2011 inside an unsealed white envelope behind 14-B on Dunmore Street.<br />- The note used Pica twelve-pitch typeface consistent with mechanical typewriters.<br />- The Royal Empress typewriter with serial RE-741-09224 was logged into evidence bin 1142-C in February 2003 and remained there sealed for 8.5 years.<br />- Document examiner Bette Holt identified a malformed lowercase "t" and a left-leaning numeral "4" linking the note to Royal Empress machines made 1974-1976.<br />- The Caldwell evidence corridor visitor log showed 14 entries over 8.5 years, with 12 recorded property checks by officer Ron Vesey.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131686</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131686/0209.mp3" length="18223707" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Typewriter Locked in Evidence That Wrote a Ransom Note&#13;
&#13;
A sealed evidence bin held a Royal Empress typewriter for eight and a half years - and a ransom note demanding $40,000 was later typed on that same machine. How could a note matching a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Typewriter Locked in Evidence That Wrote a Ransom Note<br /><br />A sealed evidence bin held a Royal Empress typewriter for eight and a half years - and a ransom note demanding $40,000 was later typed on that same machine. How could a note matching a machine never signed out of the Caldwell evidence locker appear in the middle of a child’s disappearance?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the physical details of the typewriter evidence, and the courtroom moments that turned certainty into doubt. What overlooked fact inside the sealed bin ultimately unraveled the prosecution’s case?<br /><br />Person: Iris Fowler<br />Date: August 16, 2011<br />Location: Kettner Avenue; Dunmore Street; Caldwell Public Safety Building evidence locker bin 1142-C<br />Case: Kidnapping and extortion charges filed September 2011 against Cynthia Stewart<br />Item: Royal Empress typewriter serial RE-741-09224, logged February 2003<br /><br />- The ransom note demanded forty thousand dollars and was found August 18, 2011 inside an unsealed white envelope behind 14-B on Dunmore Street.<br />- The note used Pica twelve-pitch typeface consistent with mechanical typewriters.<br />- The Royal Empress typewriter with serial RE-741-09224 was logged into evidence bin 1142-C in February 2003 and remained there sealed for 8.5 years.<br />- Document examiner Bette Holt identified a malformed lowercase "t" and a left-leaning numeral "4" linking the note to Royal Empress machines made 1974-1976.<br />- The Caldwell evidence corridor visitor log showed 14 entries over 8.5 years, with 12 recorded property checks by officer Ron Vesey.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1139</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bottle, the V‑Pattern, and the Woman Who Lost Nineteen Months</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bottle-the-v-pattern-and-the-woman-who-lost-nineteen-months--73131682</link><description><![CDATA[The Bottle, the V‑Pattern, and the Woman Who Lost Nineteen Months<br /><br />The smell of smoke led Cynthia Richardson to a sixteen-ounce amber bottle with a cloth wick, uncharred and upright on dry ground - a small pool of amber liquid still at the bottom - and that bottle would eventually put the right person in prison. But before that, it cost another person nineteen months of her life. How did a V-shaped burn pattern, a floor sample, and a measuring tape end up deciding a jury's fate?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what the episode covers and trace the sequence of events from the fire on June 27 to the conviction and the later review, following the evidence, reports, and the people involved. What contradictions in the scene photos, lab report, and fire-marshal methodology went unnoticed until months later?<br /><br />Person: Kelly O'Brien, 32, customer-service manager<br />Event: Fire on the night of June 27<br />Location: Apartment 4-C, Millpond Arms, Harwick County<br />Evidence: Sixteen-ounce amber glass bottle with cloth wick found behind Calvary Lutheran Church<br />Status: Convicted on all three counts; reported to county jail in November<br /><br />- A sixteen-ounce amber glass bottle with a cloth wick and a small pool of amber liquid was found sitting upright on dry ground between a downspout and a foundation.<br />- The vinyl tile floors in Millpond Arms were original, installed in the early 1970s over wood subflooring sealed with mineral-spirit sealant.<br />- Fire Marshal Bob Travers had 22 years on the job and used V-pattern methodology for 19 years when he identified a point of origin near the base of the couch.<br />- A petroleum distillate was confirmed in a floor sample by the county lab and cited at trial.<br />- The jury deliberated nine hours across two days and returned guilty on all three counts; Kelly reported to county jail the following November.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131682</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131682/0208.mp3" length="20733970" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Bottle, the V‑Pattern, and the Woman Who Lost Nineteen Months&#13;
&#13;
The smell of smoke led Cynthia Richardson to a sixteen-ounce amber bottle with a cloth wick, uncharred and upright on dry ground - a small pool of amber liquid still at the bottom -...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Bottle, the V‑Pattern, and the Woman Who Lost Nineteen Months<br /><br />The smell of smoke led Cynthia Richardson to a sixteen-ounce amber bottle with a cloth wick, uncharred and upright on dry ground - a small pool of amber liquid still at the bottom - and that bottle would eventually put the right person in prison. But before that, it cost another person nineteen months of her life. How did a V-shaped burn pattern, a floor sample, and a measuring tape end up deciding a jury's fate?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what the episode covers and trace the sequence of events from the fire on June 27 to the conviction and the later review, following the evidence, reports, and the people involved. What contradictions in the scene photos, lab report, and fire-marshal methodology went unnoticed until months later?<br /><br />Person: Kelly O'Brien, 32, customer-service manager<br />Event: Fire on the night of June 27<br />Location: Apartment 4-C, Millpond Arms, Harwick County<br />Evidence: Sixteen-ounce amber glass bottle with cloth wick found behind Calvary Lutheran Church<br />Status: Convicted on all three counts; reported to county jail in November<br /><br />- A sixteen-ounce amber glass bottle with a cloth wick and a small pool of amber liquid was found sitting upright on dry ground between a downspout and a foundation.<br />- The vinyl tile floors in Millpond Arms were original, installed in the early 1970s over wood subflooring sealed with mineral-spirit sealant.<br />- Fire Marshal Bob Travers had 22 years on the job and used V-pattern methodology for 19 years when he identified a point of origin near the base of the couch.<br />- A petroleum distillate was confirmed in a floor sample by the county lab and cited at trial.<br />- The jury deliberated nine hours across two days and returned guilty on all three counts; Kelly reported to county jail the following November.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1296</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Glove on the Wrong Hand: The Murder That Unmasked a Thief</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/glove-on-the-wrong-hand-the-murder-that-unmasked-a-thief--73131677</link><description><![CDATA[Glove on the Wrong Hand: The Murder That Unmasked a Thief<br /><br />A single left-hand compression glove placed on a dead woman's right hand became the pivot that exposed theft, deception, and murder in a small Indiana county - a glove that did not belong to the victim, was prescription-grade, and came from a patient with bilateral lymphedema. How did that one misplaced glove point investigators toward a home-maintenance worker and change the course of a criminal trial?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from the June morning the body was found to the evidence that linked the missing glove to a Brightfield Home Maintenance worker, and we follow the forensic timeline and victim's records that raised the central question: who moved Amy Stroud, why was a medical glove put on the wrong hand, and what did Amy’s planner reveal about the motive?<br /><br />Person: Amy Stroud, 53, licensed practical nurse and volunteer<br />Date: Third week of June 2017; time-of-death window June 14-16, 2017<br />Location: Piney Run creek ravine, Renner County, Indiana<br />Person: Steven Ford, 38, Brightfield Home Maintenance worker<br />Event: Missing left-hand compression glove from patient Earl Nolan’s household<br /><br />- The body of Amy Stroud was discovered by Melvin Campbell walking his dog along Harker Ridge Nature Trail.<br />- Amy had been dead for days and her cause of death was a single heavy blow to the posterior skull.<br />- Dr. Felix Okafor determined lividity fixed her position 12-36 hours before she was found, indicating she was moved to the creek.<br />- Amy kept a detailed paper planner documenting discrepancies tied to Brightfield visits, including missing items and dates.<br />- Earl Nolan, age 78, required custom-fitted compression gloves and reported his left-hand glove went missing after Brightfield visits.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131677</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131677/0207.mp3" length="19778515" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Glove on the Wrong Hand: The Murder That Unmasked a Thief&#13;
&#13;
A single left-hand compression glove placed on a dead woman's right hand became the pivot that exposed theft, deception, and murder in a small Indiana county - a glove that did not belong to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Glove on the Wrong Hand: The Murder That Unmasked a Thief<br /><br />A single left-hand compression glove placed on a dead woman's right hand became the pivot that exposed theft, deception, and murder in a small Indiana county - a glove that did not belong to the victim, was prescription-grade, and came from a patient with bilateral lymphedema. How did that one misplaced glove point investigators toward a home-maintenance worker and change the course of a criminal trial?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from the June morning the body was found to the evidence that linked the missing glove to a Brightfield Home Maintenance worker, and we follow the forensic timeline and victim's records that raised the central question: who moved Amy Stroud, why was a medical glove put on the wrong hand, and what did Amy’s planner reveal about the motive?<br /><br />Person: Amy Stroud, 53, licensed practical nurse and volunteer<br />Date: Third week of June 2017; time-of-death window June 14-16, 2017<br />Location: Piney Run creek ravine, Renner County, Indiana<br />Person: Steven Ford, 38, Brightfield Home Maintenance worker<br />Event: Missing left-hand compression glove from patient Earl Nolan’s household<br /><br />- The body of Amy Stroud was discovered by Melvin Campbell walking his dog along Harker Ridge Nature Trail.<br />- Amy had been dead for days and her cause of death was a single heavy blow to the posterior skull.<br />- Dr. Felix Okafor determined lividity fixed her position 12-36 hours before she was found, indicating she was moved to the creek.<br />- Amy kept a detailed paper planner documenting discrepancies tied to Brightfield visits, including missing items and dates.<br />- Earl Nolan, age 78, required custom-fitted compression gloves and reported his left-hand glove went missing after Brightfield visits.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1237</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Weighted Evidence: How a Fishing Sinkerd Framed an Innocent Seamstress</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/weighted-evidence-how-a-fishing-sinkerd-framed-an-innocent-seamstress--73131674</link><description><![CDATA[Weighted Evidence: How a Fishing Sinkerd Framed an Innocent Seamstress<br /><br />A creek held a sealed plastic bag with forty-one pills, a pharmacy receipt, and a state ID-items that led police straight to a forty-four-year-old seamstress and landed her in handcuffs the same day. How did a fishing weight, a recalled lab kit, and a small-claims grudge combine to nearly send Janet Lee Taylor to prison?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events that began before six in the morning on May 9, 2017 and unfolded across Dunmore, Tennessee, tracing how physical evidence, a forensic test, and prior conflict intersected to create a case against Janet-what exactly went wrong that day?<br /><br />Person: Janet Lee Taylor<br />Date: May 9, 2017<br />Location: Dunmore, Tennessee<br />Item: 41 tablets with diamond stamp<br />Tool: Veridian CAMP-Series field kit, lot number 4471C<br /><br />- A fisherman, Tracy Sheridan, found a sealed plastic bag in the creek before six a.m. on May 9, 2017.<br />- The bag contained forty-one pills, a pharmacy receipt bearing Janet's name, and her state-issued ID.<br />- Janet had lived at 114 Corder Lane for eleven years and was forty-four years old at the time.<br />- The Veridian CAMP-Series field kit, lot number 4471C, produced a blue-purple color within forty seconds, logged as a presumptive positive.<br />- Janet had a prior small-claims court dispute with Angela Cole in 2016 over an $800 dress alteration claim.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131674</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131674/0206.mp3" length="20284246" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Weighted Evidence: How a Fishing Sinkerd Framed an Innocent Seamstress&#13;
&#13;
A creek held a sealed plastic bag with forty-one pills, a pharmacy receipt, and a state ID-items that led police straight to a forty-four-year-old seamstress and landed her in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Weighted Evidence: How a Fishing Sinkerd Framed an Innocent Seamstress<br /><br />A creek held a sealed plastic bag with forty-one pills, a pharmacy receipt, and a state ID-items that led police straight to a forty-four-year-old seamstress and landed her in handcuffs the same day. How did a fishing weight, a recalled lab kit, and a small-claims grudge combine to nearly send Janet Lee Taylor to prison?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events that began before six in the morning on May 9, 2017 and unfolded across Dunmore, Tennessee, tracing how physical evidence, a forensic test, and prior conflict intersected to create a case against Janet-what exactly went wrong that day?<br /><br />Person: Janet Lee Taylor<br />Date: May 9, 2017<br />Location: Dunmore, Tennessee<br />Item: 41 tablets with diamond stamp<br />Tool: Veridian CAMP-Series field kit, lot number 4471C<br /><br />- A fisherman, Tracy Sheridan, found a sealed plastic bag in the creek before six a.m. on May 9, 2017.<br />- The bag contained forty-one pills, a pharmacy receipt bearing Janet's name, and her state-issued ID.<br />- Janet had lived at 114 Corder Lane for eleven years and was forty-four years old at the time.<br />- The Veridian CAMP-Series field kit, lot number 4471C, produced a blue-purple color within forty seconds, logged as a presumptive positive.<br />- Janet had a prior small-claims court dispute with Angela Cole in 2016 over an $800 dress alteration claim.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1268</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Drowned Where There Was No Water: The Reclaimed-Tank Murder Revelation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/drowned-where-there-was-no-water-the-reclaimed-tank-murder-revelation--73131669</link><description><![CDATA[Drowned Where There Was No Water: The Reclaimed-Tank Murder Revelation<br /><br />A drowning confirmed by the medical examiner, diatoms in the lungs, and treated municipal water in her lungs - yet Angela Purvis was found in a dry field forty miles from any open water. How could a death by drowning occur where there was no water, and what secret tank sixty feet underground did investigators later uncover?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Angela's last confirmed sighting on April 2, 2019 to the discovery of her body on April 9 and the rushed prosecution that followed, asking whether crucial lab evidence was overlooked and how that omission shaped the case. What changed when page 41 of the medical file was finally read?<br /><br />Person: Angela Purvis<br />Date: April 9, 2019 (body found); April 2, 2019 (last confirmed sighting)<br />Location: Pembrook Road field behind equipment shed<br />Cause: Drowning (medical examiner conclusion)<br />Case: Steven Harris convicted October 2019, sentenced to 35 years<br /><br />- Angela Purvis was 24 years old and worked as a billing administrator at the Sutter County water reclamation plant for 14 months.<br />- She was last seen leaving a ceramics class at approximately 8:15 PM on April 2, 2019; her roommate filed a missing persons report on April 3.<br />- Dale Bailey, a 53-year-old county surveyor, found her arranged in dry grass behind an equipment shed on April 9, 2019.<br />- Forensic findings included petechial hemorrhages and diatoms in lung tissue; the mineral profile of lung fluid matched treated municipal water from a reclamation facility.<br />- Steven Harris, 28, who worked maintenance at the same plant and owned the Pembrook Road property, was arrested April 13 and convicted of second-degree murder in October 2019; the supplemental lab report (page 41) was not used by the defense.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131669</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131669/0205.mp3" length="21300304" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Drowned Where There Was No Water: The Reclaimed-Tank Murder Revelation&#13;
&#13;
A drowning confirmed by the medical examiner, diatoms in the lungs, and treated municipal water in her lungs - yet Angela Purvis was found in a dry field forty miles from any...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Drowned Where There Was No Water: The Reclaimed-Tank Murder Revelation<br /><br />A drowning confirmed by the medical examiner, diatoms in the lungs, and treated municipal water in her lungs - yet Angela Purvis was found in a dry field forty miles from any open water. How could a death by drowning occur where there was no water, and what secret tank sixty feet underground did investigators later uncover?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Angela's last confirmed sighting on April 2, 2019 to the discovery of her body on April 9 and the rushed prosecution that followed, asking whether crucial lab evidence was overlooked and how that omission shaped the case. What changed when page 41 of the medical file was finally read?<br /><br />Person: Angela Purvis<br />Date: April 9, 2019 (body found); April 2, 2019 (last confirmed sighting)<br />Location: Pembrook Road field behind equipment shed<br />Cause: Drowning (medical examiner conclusion)<br />Case: Steven Harris convicted October 2019, sentenced to 35 years<br /><br />- Angela Purvis was 24 years old and worked as a billing administrator at the Sutter County water reclamation plant for 14 months.<br />- She was last seen leaving a ceramics class at approximately 8:15 PM on April 2, 2019; her roommate filed a missing persons report on April 3.<br />- Dale Bailey, a 53-year-old county surveyor, found her arranged in dry grass behind an equipment shed on April 9, 2019.<br />- Forensic findings included petechial hemorrhages and diatoms in lung tissue; the mineral profile of lung fluid matched treated municipal water from a reclamation facility.<br />- Steven Harris, 28, who worked maintenance at the same plant and owned the Pembrook Road property, was arrested April 13 and convicted of second-degree murder in October 2019; the supplemental lab report (page 41) was not used by the defense.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1332</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Glasses, the Key, and the Surveyor's Silent Yard</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-glasses-the-key-and-the-surveyor-s-silent-yard--73131665</link><description><![CDATA[The Glasses, the Key, and the Surveyor's Silent Yard<br /><br />A meter reader found a pair of eyeglasses at 7:41 AM on a Tuesday in March, frames clean though the ground was soaked from two days of rain - one lens intact, the other replaced by a small brass key on a red nylon cord. Who placed those glasses on Curtis Sullivan’s drainage easement, and did that deliberate placement link him to Connie Marsh’s death?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from Connie Marsh’s disappearance on February 14, 2017 through the discovery of her body and the evidence that went to trial, asking whether the glasses and key were the careless clue or the deliberate connection everyone assumed.<br /><br />Person: Connie Marsh<br />Date: February 14, 2017<br />Location: Fenwick Road drainage easement<br />Person: Curtis Sullivan<br />Cause of death: Asphyxiation<br /><br />- Glasses found at 7:41 AM on a Tuesday in March, frames clean despite ground soaked from two days of rain.<br />- One lens intact; the other lens replaced by a small brass key threaded on a red nylon cord.<br />- Connie Marsh had been missing for 21 days when the glasses were found.<br />- Connie Marsh was 38 years old and worked 14 months as a home health aide, including visits to Norma Sullivan.<br />- Curtis Sullivan was a 54-year-old former county road surveyor who owned the property and had lived on Fenwick Road for 11 years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131665</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131665/0204.mp3" length="16936811" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Glasses, the Key, and the Surveyor's Silent Yard&#13;
&#13;
A meter reader found a pair of eyeglasses at 7:41 AM on a Tuesday in March, frames clean though the ground was soaked from two days of rain - one lens intact, the other replaced by a small brass...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Glasses, the Key, and the Surveyor's Silent Yard<br /><br />A meter reader found a pair of eyeglasses at 7:41 AM on a Tuesday in March, frames clean though the ground was soaked from two days of rain - one lens intact, the other replaced by a small brass key on a red nylon cord. Who placed those glasses on Curtis Sullivan’s drainage easement, and did that deliberate placement link him to Connie Marsh’s death?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from Connie Marsh’s disappearance on February 14, 2017 through the discovery of her body and the evidence that went to trial, asking whether the glasses and key were the careless clue or the deliberate connection everyone assumed.<br /><br />Person: Connie Marsh<br />Date: February 14, 2017<br />Location: Fenwick Road drainage easement<br />Person: Curtis Sullivan<br />Cause of death: Asphyxiation<br /><br />- Glasses found at 7:41 AM on a Tuesday in March, frames clean despite ground soaked from two days of rain.<br />- One lens intact; the other lens replaced by a small brass key threaded on a red nylon cord.<br />- Connie Marsh had been missing for 21 days when the glasses were found.<br />- Connie Marsh was 38 years old and worked 14 months as a home health aide, including visits to Norma Sullivan.<br />- Curtis Sullivan was a 54-year-old former county road surveyor who owned the property and had lived on Fenwick Road for 11 years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1059</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Dry Shoe That Sent a Man to Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dry-shoe-that-sent-a-man-to-prison--73131664</link><description><![CDATA[The Dry Shoe That Sent a Man to Prison<br /><br />A single dry tan suede ankle boot, size seven, sat upright on a wet, icy gravel bar the morning of February 9 - a small, concrete detail that helped send an innocent man to prison for four years. How did one shoe, a badge clipped to a jacket, and two cell-tower pings become the fulcrum of a wrongful conviction?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and evidence: where Carla Denton worked and when she left, the discovery of her body, the witness who saw a gray hatchback, and the technical records that tied a phone - and a suspect - to the scene. Which piece of evidence was misread, and how did a late-night phone call change everything?<br /><br />Person: Carla Denton<br />Age: 28<br />Location: Sable Creek culvert, 80 yards from gravel bar<br />Date: February 9 (body found), time of death estimated between Feb 8 9:00 PM and Feb 9 1:00 AM<br />Detective: Marcus Webb, 17-year veteran<br /><br />- A tan suede ankle boot, size seven, was found dry on a wet, icy gravel bar on the morning of February 9.<br />- Carla Denton left Westfield Care side door at 11:46 PM according to side-door camera footage and a badge exit log.<br />- Carla’s body was found in a culvert beneath the service road, 80 yards from where the boot was photographed.<br />- Medical examiner estimated time of death between 9:00 PM Feb 8 and 1:00 AM Feb 9; cause of death was manual strangulation.<br />- Cell-tower logs showed two pings from Dennis Rice’s phone to tower CAV-7 at 11:51 PM and 12:18 AM, a key piece of evidence used by investigators.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131664</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131664/0203.mp3" length="21518479" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Dry Shoe That Sent a Man to Prison&#13;
&#13;
A single dry tan suede ankle boot, size seven, sat upright on a wet, icy gravel bar the morning of February 9 - a small, concrete detail that helped send an innocent man to prison for four years. How did one...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Dry Shoe That Sent a Man to Prison<br /><br />A single dry tan suede ankle boot, size seven, sat upright on a wet, icy gravel bar the morning of February 9 - a small, concrete detail that helped send an innocent man to prison for four years. How did one shoe, a badge clipped to a jacket, and two cell-tower pings become the fulcrum of a wrongful conviction?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and evidence: where Carla Denton worked and when she left, the discovery of her body, the witness who saw a gray hatchback, and the technical records that tied a phone - and a suspect - to the scene. Which piece of evidence was misread, and how did a late-night phone call change everything?<br /><br />Person: Carla Denton<br />Age: 28<br />Location: Sable Creek culvert, 80 yards from gravel bar<br />Date: February 9 (body found), time of death estimated between Feb 8 9:00 PM and Feb 9 1:00 AM<br />Detective: Marcus Webb, 17-year veteran<br /><br />- A tan suede ankle boot, size seven, was found dry on a wet, icy gravel bar on the morning of February 9.<br />- Carla Denton left Westfield Care side door at 11:46 PM according to side-door camera footage and a badge exit log.<br />- Carla’s body was found in a culvert beneath the service road, 80 yards from where the boot was photographed.<br />- Medical examiner estimated time of death between 9:00 PM Feb 8 and 1:00 AM Feb 9; cause of death was manual strangulation.<br />- Cell-tower logs showed two pings from Dennis Rice’s phone to tower CAV-7 at 11:51 PM and 12:18 AM, a key piece of evidence used by investigators.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1345</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Open Door, the Shoe, and the Will Signed by a Dead Man</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-open-door-the-shoe-and-the-will-signed-by-a-dead-man--73131663</link><description><![CDATA[The Open Door, the Shoe, and the Will Signed by a Dead Man<br /><br />The morning a paperboy found a size eleven brown dress shoe in an open doorway, an eighty-one-year-old man had already been dead for days - and a new will had been filed naming a witness who had died three days before the document was dated. How did a will dated December 19, 2010, bearing a dead man's name as witness, nearly redirect nearly two million dollars away from the decedent's named heir?<br /><br />In this episode, we present the sequence of events from the open door on Crestfall Avenue to the probate contest, following the people, the documents, and the forensic work that exposed the contradiction at the heart of the case. What forensic detail unspooled a carefully positioned fraud and proved the will could not be genuine?<br /><br />Person: Walter Pryce<br />Date: January 9, 2011<br />Location: 412 Crestfall Avenue, Dunmore<br />Case: 2011-PR-0047<br />Person: James Cutter (deceased December 16, 2010)<br /><br />- The front door at 412 Crestfall Avenue was standing open at 6:14 AM on January 9, 2011.<br />- Walter Pryce, age 81, had been dead for three or four days when found by the paperboy.<br />- A will dated December 19, 2010, was filed on January 12, 2011, by a man named Frank Seward.<br />- The filed will named James Cutter as a witness, but Cutter died on December 16, 2010, three days before the will's date.<br />- Examiner Carol Hutchins compared the will signature against 47 authenticated Pryce exemplars from 2004-2010.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131663</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131663/0202.mp3" length="19933160" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Open Door, the Shoe, and the Will Signed by a Dead Man&#13;
&#13;
The morning a paperboy found a size eleven brown dress shoe in an open doorway, an eighty-one-year-old man had already been dead for days - and a new will had been filed naming a witness...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Open Door, the Shoe, and the Will Signed by a Dead Man<br /><br />The morning a paperboy found a size eleven brown dress shoe in an open doorway, an eighty-one-year-old man had already been dead for days - and a new will had been filed naming a witness who had died three days before the document was dated. How did a will dated December 19, 2010, bearing a dead man's name as witness, nearly redirect nearly two million dollars away from the decedent's named heir?<br /><br />In this episode, we present the sequence of events from the open door on Crestfall Avenue to the probate contest, following the people, the documents, and the forensic work that exposed the contradiction at the heart of the case. What forensic detail unspooled a carefully positioned fraud and proved the will could not be genuine?<br /><br />Person: Walter Pryce<br />Date: January 9, 2011<br />Location: 412 Crestfall Avenue, Dunmore<br />Case: 2011-PR-0047<br />Person: James Cutter (deceased December 16, 2010)<br /><br />- The front door at 412 Crestfall Avenue was standing open at 6:14 AM on January 9, 2011.<br />- Walter Pryce, age 81, had been dead for three or four days when found by the paperboy.<br />- A will dated December 19, 2010, was filed on January 12, 2011, by a man named Frank Seward.<br />- The filed will named James Cutter as a witness, but Cutter died on December 16, 2010, three days before the will's date.<br />- Examiner Carol Hutchins compared the will signature against 47 authenticated Pryce exemplars from 2004-2010.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1246</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Hammer That Convicted Him - Evidence No One Read</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-hammer-that-convicted-him-evidence-no-one-read--73131662</link><description><![CDATA[The Hammer That Convicted Him - Evidence No One Read<br /><br />A discarded hammer found in a roadside ditch after a December storm carried blood that matched a murdered 61-year-old teacher - and a single partial fingerprint that matched the county's own evidence technician. How did one exhibit, logged as Exhibit 14 in Harwick County Superior Court case CR-7741, become the hinge for an arrest, a dismissal, two convictions, and a destroyed object that nobody read closely enough?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline from the plow blade striking the tool on the morning of December 9, 2011 to the hammer sitting on the defense table during eleven days of trial in October 2013, and we ask how a forensic evidence log could hold the question that decided the case.<br /><br />Person: Deborah Vance<br />Date: December 9, 2011<br />Location: County Road 18; 4 Millstone Court, Fallston<br />Case: CR-7741<br />Exhibit: Exhibit 14 (hammer)<br /><br />- 7:14 AM on December 9, 2011 - Bruce Burke's plow blade kicked a sixteen-ounce Estwing claw hammer into the ditch.<br />- The hammer was not present when Burke plowed the same stretch two days earlier on December 7, 2011.<br />- Biological material on the hammer head matched Deborah Vance at every tested DNA locus.<br />- A single latent print of eleven ridge characteristics was lifted from the steel collar of the hammer.<br />- The latent print matched Tina Okafor, the Harwick County forensic evidence technician who first processed the hammer at the road shoulder.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131662</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131662/0201.mp3" length="19484690" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Hammer That Convicted Him - Evidence No One Read&#13;
&#13;
A discarded hammer found in a roadside ditch after a December storm carried blood that matched a murdered 61-year-old teacher - and a single partial fingerprint that matched the county's own...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Hammer That Convicted Him - Evidence No One Read<br /><br />A discarded hammer found in a roadside ditch after a December storm carried blood that matched a murdered 61-year-old teacher - and a single partial fingerprint that matched the county's own evidence technician. How did one exhibit, logged as Exhibit 14 in Harwick County Superior Court case CR-7741, become the hinge for an arrest, a dismissal, two convictions, and a destroyed object that nobody read closely enough?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline from the plow blade striking the tool on the morning of December 9, 2011 to the hammer sitting on the defense table during eleven days of trial in October 2013, and we ask how a forensic evidence log could hold the question that decided the case.<br /><br />Person: Deborah Vance<br />Date: December 9, 2011<br />Location: County Road 18; 4 Millstone Court, Fallston<br />Case: CR-7741<br />Exhibit: Exhibit 14 (hammer)<br /><br />- 7:14 AM on December 9, 2011 - Bruce Burke's plow blade kicked a sixteen-ounce Estwing claw hammer into the ditch.<br />- The hammer was not present when Burke plowed the same stretch two days earlier on December 7, 2011.<br />- Biological material on the hammer head matched Deborah Vance at every tested DNA locus.<br />- A single latent print of eleven ridge characteristics was lifted from the steel collar of the hammer.<br />- The latent print matched Tina Okafor, the Harwick County forensic evidence technician who first processed the hammer at the road shoulder.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1218</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Orange Juice That Should Have Freed Her: How Evidence Lied</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-orange-juice-that-should-have-freed-her-how-evidence-lied--73131660</link><description><![CDATA[The Orange Juice That Should Have Freed Her: How Evidence Lied<br /><br />The glass of orange juice on a cold concrete step never froze even though the temperature stayed below 28°C, and that single, overlooked detail should have upended the case from the start - so how did it get logged, photographed, and then ignored while a young woman went to prison? What other pieces of evidence were misread, and how did a reversed surveillance tape send an innocent person to a 22-year sentence?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events as recorded in reports and interviews, from the discovery on Teller Road to the forensic review that flipped the key video evidence, and we ask whether routine procedures and unexamined assumptions can cost someone their freedom.<br /><br />Person: Deanna Marsh<br />Person: Kelly Wagner<br />Person: Raymond O'Brien<br />Date: November 14<br />Location: 42 Teller Road<br /><br />- The orange juice on the concrete step remained unfrozen despite temperatures not rising above 28 degrees since before midnight.<br />- Raymond O'Brien was dispatched before seven in the morning on November 14 and found the back door open about four inches.<br />- Deanna Marsh, age 43, was found strangled with her purse on the kitchen counter and her car in the driveway.<br />- A porch camera recorded a figure at 11:47 PM on November 13 wearing a dark green quilted jacket with a pale stripe.<br />- Kelly Wagner, age 24, was convicted of second-degree murder after six hours of jury deliberation and sentenced to 22 years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131660</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131660/0200.mp3" length="18018489" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Orange Juice That Should Have Freed Her: How Evidence Lied&#13;
&#13;
The glass of orange juice on a cold concrete step never froze even though the temperature stayed below 28°C, and that single, overlooked detail should have upended the case from the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Orange Juice That Should Have Freed Her: How Evidence Lied<br /><br />The glass of orange juice on a cold concrete step never froze even though the temperature stayed below 28°C, and that single, overlooked detail should have upended the case from the start - so how did it get logged, photographed, and then ignored while a young woman went to prison? What other pieces of evidence were misread, and how did a reversed surveillance tape send an innocent person to a 22-year sentence?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events as recorded in reports and interviews, from the discovery on Teller Road to the forensic review that flipped the key video evidence, and we ask whether routine procedures and unexamined assumptions can cost someone their freedom.<br /><br />Person: Deanna Marsh<br />Person: Kelly Wagner<br />Person: Raymond O'Brien<br />Date: November 14<br />Location: 42 Teller Road<br /><br />- The orange juice on the concrete step remained unfrozen despite temperatures not rising above 28 degrees since before midnight.<br />- Raymond O'Brien was dispatched before seven in the morning on November 14 and found the back door open about four inches.<br />- Deanna Marsh, age 43, was found strangled with her purse on the kitchen counter and her car in the driveway.<br />- A porch camera recorded a figure at 11:47 PM on November 13 wearing a dark green quilted jacket with a pale stripe.<br />- Kelly Wagner, age 24, was convicted of second-degree murder after six hours of jury deliberation and sentenced to 22 years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1127</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Locked Gates, One Punch Card, and the Confession at Trial</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/locked-gates-one-punch-card-and-the-confession-at-trial--73131659</link><description><![CDATA[Locked Gates, One Punch Card, and the Confession at Trial<br /><br />Fear that someone you trust can slip back into a locked place: at 7:41 a.m. on October 9, 2011 a runner found a silver Buick behind locked gates and Miriam Castillo inside, dead from manual strangulation - and the south gate's punch-card recorded a closing that same night. Who used a legitimate key when only four people were authorized, and why was nothing taken from her car?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how routine paperwork, a low-tech punch-card, and a duplicate key purchased in cash connected a seasonal contractor to a murder scene, and how one small unreturned object led to a courtroom confession that would decide the case.<br /><br />Person: Miriam Castillo<br />Date: October 9, 2011<br />Location: Fenner Park access road behind the maintenance shed<br />Cause: Manual strangulation<br />Investigator: Detective Marcus Webb<br /><br />- Time of discovery: 7:41 a.m. on October 9, 2011<br />- Victim age: 44 years old, deceased approximately 18 hours prior to discovery<br />- Gate log: two punches recorded on the south gate between approximately 8:00 and 10:00 p.m. on October 8, 2011<br />- Authorized keyholders: four people listed; Richard Olson had returned his key on August 22, 2011<br />- Duplicate key: Richard Olson purchased a replacement key at Denner Hardware on July 30, 2011, paid in cash<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131659</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131659/0199.mp3" length="16417287" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Locked Gates, One Punch Card, and the Confession at Trial&#13;
&#13;
Fear that someone you trust can slip back into a locked place: at 7:41 a.m. on October 9, 2011 a runner found a silver Buick behind locked gates and Miriam Castillo inside, dead from manual...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Locked Gates, One Punch Card, and the Confession at Trial<br /><br />Fear that someone you trust can slip back into a locked place: at 7:41 a.m. on October 9, 2011 a runner found a silver Buick behind locked gates and Miriam Castillo inside, dead from manual strangulation - and the south gate's punch-card recorded a closing that same night. Who used a legitimate key when only four people were authorized, and why was nothing taken from her car?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how routine paperwork, a low-tech punch-card, and a duplicate key purchased in cash connected a seasonal contractor to a murder scene, and how one small unreturned object led to a courtroom confession that would decide the case.<br /><br />Person: Miriam Castillo<br />Date: October 9, 2011<br />Location: Fenner Park access road behind the maintenance shed<br />Cause: Manual strangulation<br />Investigator: Detective Marcus Webb<br /><br />- Time of discovery: 7:41 a.m. on October 9, 2011<br />- Victim age: 44 years old, deceased approximately 18 hours prior to discovery<br />- Gate log: two punches recorded on the south gate between approximately 8:00 and 10:00 p.m. on October 8, 2011<br />- Authorized keyholders: four people listed; Richard Olson had returned his key on August 22, 2011<br />- Duplicate key: Richard Olson purchased a replacement key at Denner Hardware on July 30, 2011, paid in cash<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1027</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Watch That Convicted Her: How One Blood Type Ruined Tammy</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-watch-that-convicted-her-how-one-blood-type-ruined-tammy--73131658</link><description><![CDATA[The Watch That Convicted Her: How One Blood Type Ruined Tammy<br /><br />A stopped Seiko on a dinner plate, a kitchen door left ajar, and a single blood type that sent a woman to prison-could one common antigen decide a life? The pool of B-positive blood found on a kitchen floor, a nine-day trial, and evidence that was visible from day one all point to a case where what everyone saw was not what they asked-so who did Beverly Crane’s blood and the B-positive trace really belong to?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of discoveries from the morning William Rafferty found the watch to the trial that followed, following the physical evidence, witness accounts, and the quiet detail that went unnoticed for fourteen years. How did a B-positive blood type, shared by one in eight people, become the central fact that unraveled-or failed to prove-guilt?<br /><br />Person: Beverly Crane<br />Date: September 9, 1986<br />Location: 714 Orrin Street, Caulfield Township<br />Case: Docket CR-87-0341<br />Prosecutor: Vincent Marsh<br /><br />- A Seiko watch with a tan leather strap was found stopped at 11:14 on a white porcelain plate at 8:45 AM on September 9, 1986.<br />- Three blood deposits were collected: a smear on the door frame (matching A-positive), a mixed partial handprint on a refrigerator handle (A-positive and B-positive), and a pooled deposit near the kitchen counter base (B-positive).<br />- Beverly Crane was 38 years old and worked as a billing coordinator at Taft Regional Medical Center in Portsmith.<br />- Tammy Phillips had cleaned Beverly’s house six times between the prior year and March 1986 and had a prior unresolved $20 theft complaint filed in spring 1986.<br />- The nine-day trial opened in February 1987 before Judge Helen Pryce, where a statistician testified that B-positive occurs in approximately 12% of the population (about one in eight people).<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131658</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131658/0198.mp3" length="18841451" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Watch That Convicted Her: How One Blood Type Ruined Tammy&#13;
&#13;
A stopped Seiko on a dinner plate, a kitchen door left ajar, and a single blood type that sent a woman to prison-could one common antigen decide a life? The pool of B-positive blood...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Watch That Convicted Her: How One Blood Type Ruined Tammy<br /><br />A stopped Seiko on a dinner plate, a kitchen door left ajar, and a single blood type that sent a woman to prison-could one common antigen decide a life? The pool of B-positive blood found on a kitchen floor, a nine-day trial, and evidence that was visible from day one all point to a case where what everyone saw was not what they asked-so who did Beverly Crane’s blood and the B-positive trace really belong to?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of discoveries from the morning William Rafferty found the watch to the trial that followed, following the physical evidence, witness accounts, and the quiet detail that went unnoticed for fourteen years. How did a B-positive blood type, shared by one in eight people, become the central fact that unraveled-or failed to prove-guilt?<br /><br />Person: Beverly Crane<br />Date: September 9, 1986<br />Location: 714 Orrin Street, Caulfield Township<br />Case: Docket CR-87-0341<br />Prosecutor: Vincent Marsh<br /><br />- A Seiko watch with a tan leather strap was found stopped at 11:14 on a white porcelain plate at 8:45 AM on September 9, 1986.<br />- Three blood deposits were collected: a smear on the door frame (matching A-positive), a mixed partial handprint on a refrigerator handle (A-positive and B-positive), and a pooled deposit near the kitchen counter base (B-positive).<br />- Beverly Crane was 38 years old and worked as a billing coordinator at Taft Regional Medical Center in Portsmith.<br />- Tammy Phillips had cleaned Beverly’s house six times between the prior year and March 1986 and had a prior unresolved $20 theft complaint filed in spring 1986.<br />- The nine-day trial opened in February 1987 before Judge Helen Pryce, where a statistician testified that B-positive occurs in approximately 12% of the population (about one in eight people).<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1178</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Tote Bag That Convicted One Woman - And Freed Another</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-tote-bag-that-convicted-one-woman-and-freed-another--73131657</link><description><![CDATA[The Tote Bag That Convicted One Woman - And Freed Another<br /><br />Fear that a single overlooked object can upend a life: a pale green Harwick Farm Supply tote with a cut wristwatch and license plates was found behind Calvary Lutheran Church five days after a reported burglary, and within two weeks the homeowner was arrested - but whose prints were on the strap, and where did the bag really come from?<br /><br />In this episode, you’ll hear the sequence of discoveries from the morning the tote was found through arrests and defense review, and how one partial fingerprint and a thirteen-week gap between readings of the same evidence changed the case. Which reading was right, and how did the same evidence both convict and clear a person?<br /><br />Person: Frances Hunter<br />Date: August 3-9, 2011 (burglary night to tote discovery)<br />Location: Whitmore Drive (home) and Calvary Lutheran Church (tote found)<br />Item: pale green Harwick Farm Supply canvas tote with Harwick logo<br />Charge: evidence tampering and theft by deception<br /><br />- Tote was found at 7:20 AM on August 9, 2011 behind Calvary Lutheran Church.<br />- Items inside the tote: two license plates on a sheared steel bracket and a silver Citizen wristwatch with its band cut.<br />- Frances reported a burglary the night of August 3 into August 4 with missing items including a Citizen quartz wristwatch, laptop, and $200 cash.<br />- Frances was arrested on August 17, 2011, thirteen days after her burglary report.<br />- The tote strap carried a partial fingerprint that did not match Frances Hunter.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131657</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131657/0197.mp3" length="20162620" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Tote Bag That Convicted One Woman - And Freed Another&#13;
&#13;
Fear that a single overlooked object can upend a life: a pale green Harwick Farm Supply tote with a cut wristwatch and license plates was found behind Calvary Lutheran Church five days after...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Tote Bag That Convicted One Woman - And Freed Another<br /><br />Fear that a single overlooked object can upend a life: a pale green Harwick Farm Supply tote with a cut wristwatch and license plates was found behind Calvary Lutheran Church five days after a reported burglary, and within two weeks the homeowner was arrested - but whose prints were on the strap, and where did the bag really come from?<br /><br />In this episode, you’ll hear the sequence of discoveries from the morning the tote was found through arrests and defense review, and how one partial fingerprint and a thirteen-week gap between readings of the same evidence changed the case. Which reading was right, and how did the same evidence both convict and clear a person?<br /><br />Person: Frances Hunter<br />Date: August 3-9, 2011 (burglary night to tote discovery)<br />Location: Whitmore Drive (home) and Calvary Lutheran Church (tote found)<br />Item: pale green Harwick Farm Supply canvas tote with Harwick logo<br />Charge: evidence tampering and theft by deception<br /><br />- Tote was found at 7:20 AM on August 9, 2011 behind Calvary Lutheran Church.<br />- Items inside the tote: two license plates on a sheared steel bracket and a silver Citizen wristwatch with its band cut.<br />- Frances reported a burglary the night of August 3 into August 4 with missing items including a Citizen quartz wristwatch, laptop, and $200 cash.<br />- Frances was arrested on August 17, 2011, thirteen days after her burglary report.<br />- The tote strap carried a partial fingerprint that did not match Frances Hunter.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1261</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Rain Gauge That Sent a Woman to Trial - Then Freed Her</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-rain-gauge-that-sent-a-woman-to-trial-then-freed-her--73131655</link><description><![CDATA[The Rain Gauge That Sent a Woman to Trial - Then Freed Her<br /><br />Fear that a single overlooked object can decide a life: a plastic rain gauge found eleven feet off Azalea Creek Trail became State's Exhibit Fourteen, helped send Judith Nelson to trial after a body was found beneath the pine duff, and later opened the path to her freedom-so who really placed it there and why?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from Alice Turner's July 9, 2019 discovery through the arrest and trial that followed, tracing evidence around a rain gauge, a deleted text, payroll discrepancies, and a late confession that reshaped the case-how did one small object change everything?<br /><br />Person: Renata Voss<br />Person: Judith Nelson<br />Date: July 9, 2019<br />Location: Azalea Creek Trail<br />Event: Rain gauge found eleven feet off trail, water column still reading<br /><br />- The rain gauge was located eleven feet off Azalea Creek Trail, pressed into dry Tennessee soil.<br />- Alice Turner discovered the gauge and disturbed earth at 7:40 AM on July 9, 2019.<br />- Renata Voss was last confirmed at work on June 28, 2019 and reported absent by June 30, 2019.<br />- A message from Judith Nelson's number on June 24, 2019 read: "We should talk somewhere quiet. I know where you walk."<br />- Judith Nelson's E-ZPass registered a toll on Route Nine at 11:58 AM on June 29, 2019.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131655</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131655/0196.mp3" length="19574133" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Rain Gauge That Sent a Woman to Trial - Then Freed Her&#13;
&#13;
Fear that a single overlooked object can decide a life: a plastic rain gauge found eleven feet off Azalea Creek Trail became State's Exhibit Fourteen, helped send Judith Nelson to trial...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Rain Gauge That Sent a Woman to Trial - Then Freed Her<br /><br />Fear that a single overlooked object can decide a life: a plastic rain gauge found eleven feet off Azalea Creek Trail became State's Exhibit Fourteen, helped send Judith Nelson to trial after a body was found beneath the pine duff, and later opened the path to her freedom-so who really placed it there and why?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from Alice Turner's July 9, 2019 discovery through the arrest and trial that followed, tracing evidence around a rain gauge, a deleted text, payroll discrepancies, and a late confession that reshaped the case-how did one small object change everything?<br /><br />Person: Renata Voss<br />Person: Judith Nelson<br />Date: July 9, 2019<br />Location: Azalea Creek Trail<br />Event: Rain gauge found eleven feet off trail, water column still reading<br /><br />- The rain gauge was located eleven feet off Azalea Creek Trail, pressed into dry Tennessee soil.<br />- Alice Turner discovered the gauge and disturbed earth at 7:40 AM on July 9, 2019.<br />- Renata Voss was last confirmed at work on June 28, 2019 and reported absent by June 30, 2019.<br />- A message from Judith Nelson's number on June 24, 2019 read: "We should talk somewhere quiet. I know where you walk."<br />- Judith Nelson's E-ZPass registered a toll on Route Nine at 11:58 AM on June 29, 2019.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1224</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Door That Didn't Lock: The Timestamp That Broke a Trial</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-door-that-didn-t-lock-the-timestamp-that-broke-a-trial--73131650</link><description><![CDATA[The Door That Didn't Lock: The Timestamp That Broke a Trial<br /><br />A wrong camera timestamp off by exactly fifty-eight minutes turned a single photograph into the hinge of a murder trial that deadlocked a jury. Who was standing in the doorway before Melissa Tran left work, and how did a maintenance work order timestamp change everything?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the timeline of Melissa Tran’s disappearance, the discovery of her body in the Aldine River, and the three pieces of evidence that focused suspicion on maintenance technician Kenneth Johnson - but left crucial questions unresolved. How could a completed work order stamped at 4:17 p.m. place Johnson at an apartment he never entered?<br /><br />Person: Melissa Tran<br />Person: Kenneth Johnson<br />Date: June 1, 2011<br />Location: Aldine River<br />Cause of death: Manual strangulation<br /><br />- Melissa was twenty-six and had called her mother every Wednesday at 10:30 p.m, for three years.<br />- Gas station cameras recorded Melissa at 9:47 p.m. on Birch and Colton the night she disappeared.<br />- Kenneth Johnson had worked six years for Harmon Property Group with master keys for fourteen buildings.<br />- A DNA match from a hair in Melissa’s tote was reported by Dr. Carl Weston as one in four hundred billion.<br />- A work order for apartment 4-C was timestamped 4:17 p.m. on June 1, 2011, but the tenant Howard Bell heard no knock and no one entered.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131650</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131650/0195.mp3" length="20672948" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Door That Didn't Lock: The Timestamp That Broke a Trial&#13;
&#13;
A wrong camera timestamp off by exactly fifty-eight minutes turned a single photograph into the hinge of a murder trial that deadlocked a jury. Who was standing in the doorway before...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Door That Didn't Lock: The Timestamp That Broke a Trial<br /><br />A wrong camera timestamp off by exactly fifty-eight minutes turned a single photograph into the hinge of a murder trial that deadlocked a jury. Who was standing in the doorway before Melissa Tran left work, and how did a maintenance work order timestamp change everything?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the timeline of Melissa Tran’s disappearance, the discovery of her body in the Aldine River, and the three pieces of evidence that focused suspicion on maintenance technician Kenneth Johnson - but left crucial questions unresolved. How could a completed work order stamped at 4:17 p.m. place Johnson at an apartment he never entered?<br /><br />Person: Melissa Tran<br />Person: Kenneth Johnson<br />Date: June 1, 2011<br />Location: Aldine River<br />Cause of death: Manual strangulation<br /><br />- Melissa was twenty-six and had called her mother every Wednesday at 10:30 p.m, for three years.<br />- Gas station cameras recorded Melissa at 9:47 p.m. on Birch and Colton the night she disappeared.<br />- Kenneth Johnson had worked six years for Harmon Property Group with master keys for fourteen buildings.<br />- A DNA match from a hair in Melissa’s tote was reported by Dr. Carl Weston as one in four hundred billion.<br />- A work order for apartment 4-C was timestamped 4:17 p.m. on June 1, 2011, but the tenant Howard Bell heard no knock and no one entered.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1292</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Glasses in the Woods: The Receipt That Convicted Jennifer Wells</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/glasses-in-the-woods-the-receipt-that-convicted-jennifer-wells--73131644</link><description><![CDATA[Glasses in the Woods: The Receipt That Convicted Jennifer Wells<br /><br />A pair of folded reading glasses sat on a concrete survey monument east of Hallet Creek on May 9, 2011, lenses clean and centered - they belonged to Sandra Metz, who had been missing for eight days. Within 600 feet, investigators found a three-foot-deep disturbed hole with trace decomposition and a single blouse button; how did Sandra’s glasses end up there, and who bought a receipt from a Packer Lane Quik Mart at 11:44 p.m. the night she vanished?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of discoveries from the surveyor’s find through the expanding search and the evidence that tied the scene together, focusing on the receipt that prosecutors said connected the pieces. What did that 11:44 p.m. Quik Mart purchase reveal about who was with Sandra the night she disappeared?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Metz<br />Age: 44<br />Date found (glasses): May 9, 2011<br />Location found (glasses): concrete survey monument east of Hallet Creek<br />Receipt time: 11:44 p.m.<br /><br />- Sandra Metz clocked out at 11:22 p.m. the night she disappeared after staying 25 minutes late.<br />- The surveyor Thomas Johnson found Sandra’s glasses folded on a monument on the morning of May 9, 2011, about 600 feet from a later search area.<br />- Investigators found a hole roughly three feet deep and four feet long off Packer Lane with packed soil and trace amounts consistent with decomposition.<br />- A small, flat blouse-compatible button was pressed into the dirt at the edge of that disturbed hole.<br />- The Quik Mart receipt from Packer Lane was for two bottles of water and a box of vinyl gloves, printed at 11:44 p.m. on the night Sandra disappeared.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131644</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131644/0194.mp3" length="22058064" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Glasses in the Woods: The Receipt That Convicted Jennifer Wells&#13;
&#13;
A pair of folded reading glasses sat on a concrete survey monument east of Hallet Creek on May 9, 2011, lenses clean and centered - they belonged to Sandra Metz, who had been missing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Glasses in the Woods: The Receipt That Convicted Jennifer Wells<br /><br />A pair of folded reading glasses sat on a concrete survey monument east of Hallet Creek on May 9, 2011, lenses clean and centered - they belonged to Sandra Metz, who had been missing for eight days. Within 600 feet, investigators found a three-foot-deep disturbed hole with trace decomposition and a single blouse button; how did Sandra’s glasses end up there, and who bought a receipt from a Packer Lane Quik Mart at 11:44 p.m. the night she vanished?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of discoveries from the surveyor’s find through the expanding search and the evidence that tied the scene together, focusing on the receipt that prosecutors said connected the pieces. What did that 11:44 p.m. Quik Mart purchase reveal about who was with Sandra the night she disappeared?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Metz<br />Age: 44<br />Date found (glasses): May 9, 2011<br />Location found (glasses): concrete survey monument east of Hallet Creek<br />Receipt time: 11:44 p.m.<br /><br />- Sandra Metz clocked out at 11:22 p.m. the night she disappeared after staying 25 minutes late.<br />- The surveyor Thomas Johnson found Sandra’s glasses folded on a monument on the morning of May 9, 2011, about 600 feet from a later search area.<br />- Investigators found a hole roughly three feet deep and four feet long off Packer Lane with packed soil and trace amounts consistent with decomposition.<br />- A small, flat blouse-compatible button was pressed into the dirt at the edge of that disturbed hole.<br />- The Quik Mart receipt from Packer Lane was for two bottles of water and a box of vinyl gloves, printed at 11:44 p.m. on the night Sandra disappeared.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1379</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Dry Purse, Sewn Alibi: How One Bag Convicted Her</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/dry-purse-sewn-alibi-how-one-bag-convicted-her--73131641</link><description><![CDATA[Dry Purse, Sewn Alibi: How One Bag Convicted Her<br /><br />A dry leather purse sealed underground for six days became the single object that sent a twenty-two-year-old to trial: it contained her ID, forty-three dollars, a lip balm and a gasoline receipt dated April 3, 2011 - yet the one alibi that might have mattered was never presented. How did a paralegal find an untouched lead - and why did the defense never call the witness whose text placed the accused forty minutes away?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from the discovery at a septic lift station to the courtroom evidence and the later review of the file, asking whether the right questions were ever asked about that dry purse and the uncontacted alibi witness.<br /><br />Person: Darlene Dixon<br />Date: April 3, 2011<br />Location: 4 Pryor Lane<br />Person: Sandra Cole<br />Person: Warren Jensen<br /><br />- Purse was found zip-tied to the pump housing inside a septic lift station and had been there for six days yet was bone dry.<br />- Inside the purse: Darlene Dixon's Wisconsin driver's license, $43 cash, a lip balm, and a gasoline receipt dated April 3, 2011.<br />- Darlene Dixon was arrested on April 4, 2011 and charged with second-degree homicide before Sandra Cole's body was officially discovered.<br />- Sandra Cole was 41 years old in spring 2011 and owned 4 Pryor Lane, having renovated the second floor and rented the spare bedroom.<br />- A law student flagged "alibi witness not contacted," leading paralegal Warren Jensen in spring 2015 to discover Jennifer Ramsey had sent a text at 8:52 PM from Linda Dixon's address placing Darlene in Portell that night.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131641</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131641/0193.mp3" length="20964683" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Dry Purse, Sewn Alibi: How One Bag Convicted Her&#13;
&#13;
A dry leather purse sealed underground for six days became the single object that sent a twenty-two-year-old to trial: it contained her ID, forty-three dollars, a lip balm and a gasoline receipt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Dry Purse, Sewn Alibi: How One Bag Convicted Her<br /><br />A dry leather purse sealed underground for six days became the single object that sent a twenty-two-year-old to trial: it contained her ID, forty-three dollars, a lip balm and a gasoline receipt dated April 3, 2011 - yet the one alibi that might have mattered was never presented. How did a paralegal find an untouched lead - and why did the defense never call the witness whose text placed the accused forty minutes away?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from the discovery at a septic lift station to the courtroom evidence and the later review of the file, asking whether the right questions were ever asked about that dry purse and the uncontacted alibi witness.<br /><br />Person: Darlene Dixon<br />Date: April 3, 2011<br />Location: 4 Pryor Lane<br />Person: Sandra Cole<br />Person: Warren Jensen<br /><br />- Purse was found zip-tied to the pump housing inside a septic lift station and had been there for six days yet was bone dry.<br />- Inside the purse: Darlene Dixon's Wisconsin driver's license, $43 cash, a lip balm, and a gasoline receipt dated April 3, 2011.<br />- Darlene Dixon was arrested on April 4, 2011 and charged with second-degree homicide before Sandra Cole's body was officially discovered.<br />- Sandra Cole was 41 years old in spring 2011 and owned 4 Pryor Lane, having renovated the second floor and rented the spare bedroom.<br />- A law student flagged "alibi witness not contacted," leading paralegal Warren Jensen in spring 2015 to discover Jennifer Ramsey had sent a text at 8:52 PM from Linda Dixon's address placing Darlene in Portell that night.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1311</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Glove That Proved He Lied: The Weston County Secret</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-glove-that-proved-he-lied-the-weston-county-secret--73131639</link><description><![CDATA[The Glove That Proved He Lied: The Weston County Secret<br /><br />Fear tightens when a single glove appears upright on an ice shelf with no footprints and no explanation: a burgundy leather glove, size small, photographed 41 times, found 18 inches above the waterline and 112 yards upstream from where the body surfaced-how did it get there and who put it in that exact position? What specific human act, direction, and time could place a murderer at the levee?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of discoveries and records that shifted suspicion from absence to proximity, from a disputed alibi to physical clues that aligned a man with the scene-could those facts be the thread that unraveled the truth?<br /><br />Person: Linda Barrett<br />Date: March 2-4, 2011<br />Location: Cassidy River levee<br />Case: Missing person later homicide<br />Person: Charles Holmes<br /><br />- Glove: burgundy leather with cream fleece lining, size small, photographed 41 times from six angles.<br />- Body recovery: Linda Barrett’s body surfaced five days later, 112 yards downstream.<br />- Timeline: Linda last called her sister between 8:00 and 8:30 pm while walking the levee; she worked 11 pm-7 am shifts.<br />- Alibi contradicted: Sunoco gas receipt timestamped 9:47 pm on March 2, 2011, charged to Charles Holmes’s debit card at a station 4.3 miles from the levee.<br />- Witness detail: Dog-walker George Abbot reported his beagle froze and stared toward the bank near the ice shelf at approximately 10:00 pm on March 2.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131639</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131639/0192.mp3" length="18742812" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Glove That Proved He Lied: The Weston County Secret&#13;
&#13;
Fear tightens when a single glove appears upright on an ice shelf with no footprints and no explanation: a burgundy leather glove, size small, photographed 41 times, found 18 inches above the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Glove That Proved He Lied: The Weston County Secret<br /><br />Fear tightens when a single glove appears upright on an ice shelf with no footprints and no explanation: a burgundy leather glove, size small, photographed 41 times, found 18 inches above the waterline and 112 yards upstream from where the body surfaced-how did it get there and who put it in that exact position? What specific human act, direction, and time could place a murderer at the levee?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of discoveries and records that shifted suspicion from absence to proximity, from a disputed alibi to physical clues that aligned a man with the scene-could those facts be the thread that unraveled the truth?<br /><br />Person: Linda Barrett<br />Date: March 2-4, 2011<br />Location: Cassidy River levee<br />Case: Missing person later homicide<br />Person: Charles Holmes<br /><br />- Glove: burgundy leather with cream fleece lining, size small, photographed 41 times from six angles.<br />- Body recovery: Linda Barrett’s body surfaced five days later, 112 yards downstream.<br />- Timeline: Linda last called her sister between 8:00 and 8:30 pm while walking the levee; she worked 11 pm-7 am shifts.<br />- Alibi contradicted: Sunoco gas receipt timestamped 9:47 pm on March 2, 2011, charged to Charles Holmes’s debit card at a station 4.3 miles from the levee.<br />- Witness detail: Dog-walker George Abbot reported his beagle froze and stared toward the bank near the ice shelf at approximately 10:00 pm on March 2.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1172</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Toolbox on the Porch: How a Hidden Forceps Exposed A Killer</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/toolbox-on-the-porch-how-a-hidden-forceps-exposed-a-killer--73131637</link><description><![CDATA[Toolbox on the Porch: How a Hidden Forceps Exposed A Killer<br /><br />A red metal toolbox sat open on a porch railing at 5:40 a.m. on February 9, 2011, holding surgical forceps, latex gloves, and an unlabeled amber prescription bottle - and it took six weeks in an evidence locker before anyone asked why. What connects that toolbox to three other elderly women who died alone after visits from an unidentified repairman, and who finally noticed the pattern?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the trail from a paper carrier’s call to 9-1-1 to the small notations in a handwritten investigator’s ledger that opened the case, and we ask how routine medical deaths hid a deliberate poisoning until someone read the evidence twice.<br /><br />Person: Norma Elgin<br />Date: February 9, 2011<br />Location: 44 Canfield Spur, Kellwick, Ohio<br />Age: 67<br />Drug: Digoxin<br /><br />- A paper carrier, Donald Bishop, discovered the toolbox on the porch railing at 5:40 a.m, on February 9, 2011.<br />- The red metal toolbox contained surgical forceps, a pair of latex gloves, and an amber prescription bottle with its label removed.<br />- Norma Elgin had atrial fibrillation and was on a blood thinner and a rate-control medication when she died between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m.<br />- Two other women in the area had similar deaths within the prior 14 months, and one survivor, Claire Morrow, showed elevated digoxin after a home visit by a man posing as an inspector.<br />- The toolbox remained logged in the Kellwick evidence room for six weeks before an investigator’s handwritten ledger entry prompted further scrutiny.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131637</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131637/0191.mp3" length="18989826" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Toolbox on the Porch: How a Hidden Forceps Exposed A Killer&#13;
&#13;
A red metal toolbox sat open on a porch railing at 5:40 a.m. on February 9, 2011, holding surgical forceps, latex gloves, and an unlabeled amber prescription bottle - and it took six weeks...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Toolbox on the Porch: How a Hidden Forceps Exposed A Killer<br /><br />A red metal toolbox sat open on a porch railing at 5:40 a.m. on February 9, 2011, holding surgical forceps, latex gloves, and an unlabeled amber prescription bottle - and it took six weeks in an evidence locker before anyone asked why. What connects that toolbox to three other elderly women who died alone after visits from an unidentified repairman, and who finally noticed the pattern?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the trail from a paper carrier’s call to 9-1-1 to the small notations in a handwritten investigator’s ledger that opened the case, and we ask how routine medical deaths hid a deliberate poisoning until someone read the evidence twice.<br /><br />Person: Norma Elgin<br />Date: February 9, 2011<br />Location: 44 Canfield Spur, Kellwick, Ohio<br />Age: 67<br />Drug: Digoxin<br /><br />- A paper carrier, Donald Bishop, discovered the toolbox on the porch railing at 5:40 a.m, on February 9, 2011.<br />- The red metal toolbox contained surgical forceps, a pair of latex gloves, and an amber prescription bottle with its label removed.<br />- Norma Elgin had atrial fibrillation and was on a blood thinner and a rate-control medication when she died between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m.<br />- Two other women in the area had similar deaths within the prior 14 months, and one survivor, Claire Morrow, showed elevated digoxin after a home visit by a man posing as an inspector.<br />- The toolbox remained logged in the Kellwick evidence room for six weeks before an investigator’s handwritten ledger entry prompted further scrutiny.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1187</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Shoe on Callender Road: How a Bus Schedule Lied</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-shoe-on-callender-road-how-a-bus-schedule-lied--73131636</link><description><![CDATA[The Shoe on Callender Road: How a Bus Schedule Lied<br /><br />A single light-blue, size seven canvas sneaker found upright in gravel at 6:58 AM became the hinge of a nine-month trial - and the case turned on a bus timetable that had changed eleven days earlier. Who stepped out of that double-knotted shoe, why was there no sign of a fall, and how did one altered schedule flip an acquittal into a later confession?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the documents that shaped the investigation and courtroom battles, following the shoe, the bus stop routine, the phone pings, and the receipts that both implicated and defended a suspect. Which piece of paper - and whose schedule - rewrote the meaning of where Marilyn Sawyer was and when she disappeared?<br /><br />Person: Marilyn Sawyer<br />Date: January 9, 2019<br />Location: Callender Road bus stop<br />Person: Ronald Mitchell<br />Time: 6:58 AM<br /><br />- Shoe found upright in gravel at 6:58 AM, January 9, 2019, double-knotted, light blue, size seven.<br />- Mark Tillman reported the shoe at 7:03 AM after spotting it while driving west on Callender Road.<br />- Marilyn Sawyer left her apartment at 6:15 AM, normally caught the number seven eastbound bus she believed departed at 6:41 AM.<br />- Ronald Mitchell had a fuel receipt timestamped at 6:45 AM at a station 12 miles from the bus stop.<br />- Leon Grady logged a stop at Callender Road at 6:31 AM on the morning in question.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131636</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131636/0190.mp3" length="20215282" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Shoe on Callender Road: How a Bus Schedule Lied&#13;
&#13;
A single light-blue, size seven canvas sneaker found upright in gravel at 6:58 AM became the hinge of a nine-month trial - and the case turned on a bus timetable that had changed eleven days...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Shoe on Callender Road: How a Bus Schedule Lied<br /><br />A single light-blue, size seven canvas sneaker found upright in gravel at 6:58 AM became the hinge of a nine-month trial - and the case turned on a bus timetable that had changed eleven days earlier. Who stepped out of that double-knotted shoe, why was there no sign of a fall, and how did one altered schedule flip an acquittal into a later confession?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the documents that shaped the investigation and courtroom battles, following the shoe, the bus stop routine, the phone pings, and the receipts that both implicated and defended a suspect. Which piece of paper - and whose schedule - rewrote the meaning of where Marilyn Sawyer was and when she disappeared?<br /><br />Person: Marilyn Sawyer<br />Date: January 9, 2019<br />Location: Callender Road bus stop<br />Person: Ronald Mitchell<br />Time: 6:58 AM<br /><br />- Shoe found upright in gravel at 6:58 AM, January 9, 2019, double-knotted, light blue, size seven.<br />- Mark Tillman reported the shoe at 7:03 AM after spotting it while driving west on Callender Road.<br />- Marilyn Sawyer left her apartment at 6:15 AM, normally caught the number seven eastbound bus she believed departed at 6:41 AM.<br />- Ronald Mitchell had a fuel receipt timestamped at 6:45 AM at a station 12 miles from the bus stop.<br />- Leon Grady logged a stop at Callender Road at 6:31 AM on the morning in question.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1264</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Dry Sneaker: How One Shoe Sent a Man to Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dry-sneaker-how-one-shoe-sent-a-man-to-prison--73131635</link><description><![CDATA[The Dry Sneaker: How One Shoe Sent a Man to Prison<br /><br />Danger and doubt collide: a single child's sneaker, laces tied, sat on a six-inch circle of dry pavement after 4.5 inches of rain - and a photograph would become Exhibit Seven in a murder trial that ended in life without parole. How did one shoe, its match never found, become the hinge of a conviction that still sparks questions?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the people, and the evidence that connected a dry sneaker to the Linden County case number 12-CR-0041, and we follow how a jailhouse conversation and a televised broadcast resurfaced years later to challenge what that evidence proves.<br /><br />Person: Tessa Morrow<br />Age: 9<br />Date: December 2011<br />Location: Dunmore Street, Kellum, Ohio<br />Case: Linden County 12-CR-0041<br /><br />- The alley behind the Dunmore Street property had absorbed 4.5 inches of rain over the three days before the sneaker was found.<br />- Gina Weber found the upright sneaker at 7:14 AM on a Tuesday in December 2011 and photographed it before calling 911.<br />- Tessa Morrow's body was recovered roughly 40 yards north of the utility pole, beneath a collapsed corrugated culvert pipe; cause of death: asphyxiation.<br />- Edward Miller was 48, a warehouse shift supervisor with 11 years at the company, no prior convictions, and owned a 2007 diesel pickup.<br />- William Padgett, 41, shared a jail pod with Miller in August 2012 for 11 days and testified Miller described placing the sneaker on a dry spot so it would be found in that condition.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131635</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131635/0189.mp3" length="19205911" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Dry Sneaker: How One Shoe Sent a Man to Prison&#13;
&#13;
Danger and doubt collide: a single child's sneaker, laces tied, sat on a six-inch circle of dry pavement after 4.5 inches of rain - and a photograph would become Exhibit Seven in a murder trial...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Dry Sneaker: How One Shoe Sent a Man to Prison<br /><br />Danger and doubt collide: a single child's sneaker, laces tied, sat on a six-inch circle of dry pavement after 4.5 inches of rain - and a photograph would become Exhibit Seven in a murder trial that ended in life without parole. How did one shoe, its match never found, become the hinge of a conviction that still sparks questions?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the people, and the evidence that connected a dry sneaker to the Linden County case number 12-CR-0041, and we follow how a jailhouse conversation and a televised broadcast resurfaced years later to challenge what that evidence proves.<br /><br />Person: Tessa Morrow<br />Age: 9<br />Date: December 2011<br />Location: Dunmore Street, Kellum, Ohio<br />Case: Linden County 12-CR-0041<br /><br />- The alley behind the Dunmore Street property had absorbed 4.5 inches of rain over the three days before the sneaker was found.<br />- Gina Weber found the upright sneaker at 7:14 AM on a Tuesday in December 2011 and photographed it before calling 911.<br />- Tessa Morrow's body was recovered roughly 40 yards north of the utility pole, beneath a collapsed corrugated culvert pipe; cause of death: asphyxiation.<br />- Edward Miller was 48, a warehouse shift supervisor with 11 years at the company, no prior convictions, and owned a 2007 diesel pickup.<br />- William Padgett, 41, shared a jail pod with Miller in August 2012 for 11 days and testified Miller described placing the sneaker on a dry spot so it would be found in that condition.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1201</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Cake on the Mailbox: How a Dish Fueled an Arson Trial</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-cake-on-the-mailbox-how-a-dish-fueled-an-arson-trial--73131632</link><description><![CDATA[The Cake on the Mailbox: How a Dish Fueled an Arson Trial<br /><br />The first thing anyone saw was a perfect two-layer cake in a vintage amber glass baking dish perched on a mailbox post while the house behind it was a gutted, smoking shell - and the dish showed no soot or cracks. A jury would later spend days on accelerant patterns, cell tower data and a backdated insurance endorsement, only for the case to hinge on a single inventory line: Item 31 - Vintage amber glass baking dish, replacement value $60, marked destroyed - so who put the cake on the mailbox and why?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from the November 4 morning discovery through the insurance adjuster’s internal note and the backdated policy change, and we follow the investigator who traced the seam between physical clues and underwriting decisions. How did a cake and a dish come to carry the weight of a criminal case and an insurer's exposure?<br /><br />Person: Julie Evans<br />Date: November 4 (discovery at 6:47 AM) and November 3 (fire evening between 8:00-9:00 PM)<br />Location: 2240 Dellwood Avenue, Carver Flats<br />Case: Meridian Indemnity claim MI-7740-EV for $63,000 contents and $14,000 relocation<br />Item: Item 31 - Vintage amber glass baking dish; replacement value $60; inventory listed as destroyed<br /><br />- Cake was a frosted two-layer cake with white icing and sugar roses resting in an amber glass baking dish with no soot or cracks<br />- Fire cause: mineral spirits poured on subfloor near the water heater in a utility room off the kitchen, per burn-progression and 9-1-1 timing<br />- Julie Evans had a policy taken out five months before the fire (policy MI-7740-EV) and filed a contents claim for $63,000 within 72 hours<br />- Adjuster Kevin Marsh emailed underwriting on November 6 noting risk: "Policy taken out five months prior... Claimed contents value inconsistent with income profile" and flagged "Coverage gap - EV claim"<br />- Meridian amended and backdated the deliberate acts exclusion on November 7 to apply upon a probable cause finding, with a note saying "Clarifying language. no material change."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131632</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 07:00:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131632/0188.mp3" length="20334819" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Cake on the Mailbox: How a Dish Fueled an Arson Trial&#13;
&#13;
The first thing anyone saw was a perfect two-layer cake in a vintage amber glass baking dish perched on a mailbox post while the house behind it was a gutted, smoking shell - and the dish...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Cake on the Mailbox: How a Dish Fueled an Arson Trial<br /><br />The first thing anyone saw was a perfect two-layer cake in a vintage amber glass baking dish perched on a mailbox post while the house behind it was a gutted, smoking shell - and the dish showed no soot or cracks. A jury would later spend days on accelerant patterns, cell tower data and a backdated insurance endorsement, only for the case to hinge on a single inventory line: Item 31 - Vintage amber glass baking dish, replacement value $60, marked destroyed - so who put the cake on the mailbox and why?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from the November 4 morning discovery through the insurance adjuster’s internal note and the backdated policy change, and we follow the investigator who traced the seam between physical clues and underwriting decisions. How did a cake and a dish come to carry the weight of a criminal case and an insurer's exposure?<br /><br />Person: Julie Evans<br />Date: November 4 (discovery at 6:47 AM) and November 3 (fire evening between 8:00-9:00 PM)<br />Location: 2240 Dellwood Avenue, Carver Flats<br />Case: Meridian Indemnity claim MI-7740-EV for $63,000 contents and $14,000 relocation<br />Item: Item 31 - Vintage amber glass baking dish; replacement value $60; inventory listed as destroyed<br /><br />- Cake was a frosted two-layer cake with white icing and sugar roses resting in an amber glass baking dish with no soot or cracks<br />- Fire cause: mineral spirits poured on subfloor near the water heater in a utility room off the kitchen, per burn-progression and 9-1-1 timing<br />- Julie Evans had a policy taken out five months before the fire (policy MI-7740-EV) and filed a contents claim for $63,000 within 72 hours<br />- Adjuster Kevin Marsh emailed underwriting on November 6 noting risk: "Policy taken out five months prior... Claimed contents value inconsistent with income profile" and flagged "Coverage gap - EV claim"<br />- Meridian amended and backdated the deliberate acts exclusion on November 7 to apply upon a probable cause finding, with a note saying "Clarifying language. no material change."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1271</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sealed Bottle, Stolen Pills: How a Dispatch Log Exonerated an Innocent Man</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sealed-bottle-stolen-pills-how-a-dispatch-log-exonerated-an-innocent-man--73131631</link><description><![CDATA[Sealed Bottle, Stolen Pills: How a Dispatch Log Exonerated an Innocent Man<br /><br />A sealed amber bottle of sixty clonazepam tablets labeled to a Crestline supervisor was found on the concrete meter pad two feet from Deborah Nall’s back door, despite the prescription fill date being September 9 and the lower unit vacant since July. How did a full, child-safe bottle end up at a murder scene and nearly send an innocent man to prison?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Deborah Nall, the forensic trail that began with a prescription bottle, and the overlooked dispatch log entry whose device ID mismatch ultimately cleared a suspect. What detail hidden in routine paperwork changed the course of the case?<br /><br />Person: Deborah Nall<br />Date: September 9 (prescription fill date)<br />Location: Fenner Lane, Calverton, Dellwick, Ohio<br />Person: Raymond Fisher<br />Event: Found sealed bottle of 60 clonazepam tablets on concrete meter pad<br /><br />- The bottle contained sixty clonazepam tablets with a fill date of September 9 and a child-safety cap still sealed.<br />- Deborah Nall was thirty-one years old in autumn 2011 and had a seven-year-old daughter named Paige.<br />- Raymond Fisher, age fifty-two, had been prescribed clonazepam since 2008 and refilled sixty tablets monthly.<br />- Warren Green discovered and photographed the bottle at 8:40 AM on a Tuesday while walking the Calverton meter route.<br />- Melvin Hansen, age thirty-eight, had temporary dispatch authority in August and later stole a month's supply of clonazepam from Fisher's truck in September.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131631</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131631/0187.mp3" length="17568347" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sealed Bottle, Stolen Pills: How a Dispatch Log Exonerated an Innocent Man&#13;
&#13;
A sealed amber bottle of sixty clonazepam tablets labeled to a Crestline supervisor was found on the concrete meter pad two feet from Deborah Nall’s back door, despite the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sealed Bottle, Stolen Pills: How a Dispatch Log Exonerated an Innocent Man<br /><br />A sealed amber bottle of sixty clonazepam tablets labeled to a Crestline supervisor was found on the concrete meter pad two feet from Deborah Nall’s back door, despite the prescription fill date being September 9 and the lower unit vacant since July. How did a full, child-safe bottle end up at a murder scene and nearly send an innocent man to prison?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Deborah Nall, the forensic trail that began with a prescription bottle, and the overlooked dispatch log entry whose device ID mismatch ultimately cleared a suspect. What detail hidden in routine paperwork changed the course of the case?<br /><br />Person: Deborah Nall<br />Date: September 9 (prescription fill date)<br />Location: Fenner Lane, Calverton, Dellwick, Ohio<br />Person: Raymond Fisher<br />Event: Found sealed bottle of 60 clonazepam tablets on concrete meter pad<br /><br />- The bottle contained sixty clonazepam tablets with a fill date of September 9 and a child-safety cap still sealed.<br />- Deborah Nall was thirty-one years old in autumn 2011 and had a seven-year-old daughter named Paige.<br />- Raymond Fisher, age fifty-two, had been prescribed clonazepam since 2008 and refilled sixty tablets monthly.<br />- Warren Green discovered and photographed the bottle at 8:40 AM on a Tuesday while walking the Calverton meter route.<br />- Melvin Hansen, age thirty-eight, had temporary dispatch authority in August and later stole a month's supply of clonazepam from Fisher's truck in September.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1098</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Orange Stake: How a Scale Exposed a Land Fraud Scheme</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-orange-stake-how-a-scale-exposed-a-land-fraud-scheme--73131630</link><description><![CDATA[The Orange Stake: How a Scale Exposed a Land Fraud Scheme<br /><br />When a single orange-flagged wooden stake appeared six inches inside a locked church fence, it set off a chain that would unravel a seven-year land scheme across three counties. A surveying map’s scale-printed as one inch = forty feet but drawn at one inch = fifty feet-meant parcels were about twenty percent larger than declared; how did that ratio go unnoticed for years?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how routine property work and GIS overlaying exposed mismatched boundaries, and how one volunteer’s photograph led to questions that tied maps, a licensed surveyor, and a developer together. Who benefitted from the inaccurate scale, and how far did the scheme reach?<br /><br />Person: Gregory Porter<br />Person: Pete Slagle<br />Person: Earl Tucker<br />Person: Clifford Phillips<br />Event: Orange-flagged stake found inside locked church fence in September 2011<br /><br />- The stake was driven six inches inside the church fence and carried a laminated tag naming a parcel for Ridgeline Property Holdings.<br />- Earl Tucker had been a licensed surveyor for twenty-two years and filed forty-one maps across three counties.<br />- Three of Tucker’s maps stated a scale of one inch = forty feet but were actually drawn at one inch = fifty feet.<br />- Parcels on those three maps were roughly twenty percent larger, with boundary lines falling eight to twelve feet short of physical landmarks.<br />- Ridgeline Property Holdings, owned by Clifford Phillips (age forty-four), had twelve adverse-possession attempts and boundary disputes in county records.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131630</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:00:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131630/0186.mp3" length="18740304" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Orange Stake: How a Scale Exposed a Land Fraud Scheme&#13;
&#13;
When a single orange-flagged wooden stake appeared six inches inside a locked church fence, it set off a chain that would unravel a seven-year land scheme across three counties. A surveying...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Orange Stake: How a Scale Exposed a Land Fraud Scheme<br /><br />When a single orange-flagged wooden stake appeared six inches inside a locked church fence, it set off a chain that would unravel a seven-year land scheme across three counties. A surveying map’s scale-printed as one inch = forty feet but drawn at one inch = fifty feet-meant parcels were about twenty percent larger than declared; how did that ratio go unnoticed for years?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how routine property work and GIS overlaying exposed mismatched boundaries, and how one volunteer’s photograph led to questions that tied maps, a licensed surveyor, and a developer together. Who benefitted from the inaccurate scale, and how far did the scheme reach?<br /><br />Person: Gregory Porter<br />Person: Pete Slagle<br />Person: Earl Tucker<br />Person: Clifford Phillips<br />Event: Orange-flagged stake found inside locked church fence in September 2011<br /><br />- The stake was driven six inches inside the church fence and carried a laminated tag naming a parcel for Ridgeline Property Holdings.<br />- Earl Tucker had been a licensed surveyor for twenty-two years and filed forty-one maps across three counties.<br />- Three of Tucker’s maps stated a scale of one inch = forty feet but were actually drawn at one inch = fifty feet.<br />- Parcels on those three maps were roughly twenty percent larger, with boundary lines falling eight to twelve feet short of physical landmarks.<br />- Ridgeline Property Holdings, owned by Clifford Phillips (age forty-four), had twelve adverse-possession attempts and boundary disputes in county records.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1172</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Typewriter in Evidence: How a Locker Held a Kidnapper's Secret</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-typewriter-in-evidence-how-a-locker-held-a-kidnapper-s-secret--73131628</link><description><![CDATA[The Typewriter in Evidence: How a Locker Held a Kidnapper's Secret<br /><br />A typewriter that had sat logged in a police property room since June 1994 apparently produced a ransom note in August 1997 demanding $50,000 while a nine-year-old was held in a storage unit four miles from her home - so how did a machine that shouldn't have been accessible end up at the center of a kidnapping case? Who used serial number 7714-DE-0093 to type the note, and what did discovery of that machine do to the prosecution's case?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline from the August 6 disappearance to the recovery of the girl on August 11, and follow the paper trail that led investigators to an Olympia Traveller de Luxe recorded in evidence since 1994. How did an evidence-room typewriter factor into the trial of Dennis Clark, and what collapsed once the defense located the machine?<br /><br />Person: Dennis Clark<br />Event: Kidnapping of Amy Dewell<br />Date: August 6-11, 1997<br />Location: Harlan County, County Road Seven and Raymond Thorpe Trail<br />Item: Olympia Traveller de Luxe, serial number 7714-DE-0093<br /><br />- Ransom demand specified $50,000 and was printed in Courier twelve-point on standard 80-pound white copy stock.<br />- The ransom note was slipped under the Dewell front door before Thomas Dewell woke at 5:15 AM the morning after the disappearance.<br />- A cooler containing $47,000 in banded cash, a prepaid cash phone, and a folded sheet matching the ransom note was found on August 9 at the half-mile marker of Raymond Thorpe Trail.<br />- Amy Dewell, age nine and just out of third grade, was found dehydrated but physically unharmed in a storage building four miles from her home on August 11.<br />- Dennis Clark had unsupervised access to the sheriff's property room as an evidence-processing contractor from March 1995 through October 1996, while the typewriter had been logged in since June 1994.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131628</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131628/0185.mp3" length="19482600" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Typewriter in Evidence: How a Locker Held a Kidnapper's Secret&#13;
&#13;
A typewriter that had sat logged in a police property room since June 1994 apparently produced a ransom note in August 1997 demanding $50,000 while a nine-year-old was held in a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Typewriter in Evidence: How a Locker Held a Kidnapper's Secret<br /><br />A typewriter that had sat logged in a police property room since June 1994 apparently produced a ransom note in August 1997 demanding $50,000 while a nine-year-old was held in a storage unit four miles from her home - so how did a machine that shouldn't have been accessible end up at the center of a kidnapping case? Who used serial number 7714-DE-0093 to type the note, and what did discovery of that machine do to the prosecution's case?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline from the August 6 disappearance to the recovery of the girl on August 11, and follow the paper trail that led investigators to an Olympia Traveller de Luxe recorded in evidence since 1994. How did an evidence-room typewriter factor into the trial of Dennis Clark, and what collapsed once the defense located the machine?<br /><br />Person: Dennis Clark<br />Event: Kidnapping of Amy Dewell<br />Date: August 6-11, 1997<br />Location: Harlan County, County Road Seven and Raymond Thorpe Trail<br />Item: Olympia Traveller de Luxe, serial number 7714-DE-0093<br /><br />- Ransom demand specified $50,000 and was printed in Courier twelve-point on standard 80-pound white copy stock.<br />- The ransom note was slipped under the Dewell front door before Thomas Dewell woke at 5:15 AM the morning after the disappearance.<br />- A cooler containing $47,000 in banded cash, a prepaid cash phone, and a folded sheet matching the ransom note was found on August 9 at the half-mile marker of Raymond Thorpe Trail.<br />- Amy Dewell, age nine and just out of third grade, was found dehydrated but physically unharmed in a storage building four miles from her home on August 11.<br />- Dennis Clark had unsupervised access to the sheriff's property room as an evidence-processing contractor from March 1995 through October 1996, while the typewriter had been logged in since June 1994.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1218</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sealed Evidence Bag Found in River - Who Framed Michael Clark?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sealed-evidence-bag-found-in-river-who-framed-michael-clark--73131627</link><description><![CDATA[Sealed Evidence Bag Found in River - Who Framed Michael Clark?<br /><br />A sealed evidence bag with its red tamper strip intact washed up in a river holding a Seiko watch stopped at 11:41 that had been logged into the Pembrook County Sheriff's evidence room months earlier - and that same watch was tied to a homicide that sent Michael Clark to prison for forty years. Who placed an unbroken evidence bag in the water, and what did it conceal about the fire that killed Teresa Ogle?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the May 19, 2003 house fire that killed Teresa Ogle through the arrest, trial, and conviction of Michael Clark, and we follow how one piece of evidence found in the river later altered the narrative. What did the sealed bag and the missing forensic steps mean for the verdict?<br /><br />Person: Teresa Ogle<br />Date: May 19, 2003<br />Location: 2218 Ashford Road, Granger, Pembrook County, Indiana<br />Status: Convicted defendant sentenced to 40 years (Michael Clark)<br />Event: Sealed evidence bag with Seiko watch found July 9, 2003<br /><br />- The sealed evidence bag was found by a fisherman on July 9, 2003 on the eastern bank of the Sutter River with its red tamper strip still intact.<br />- The watch inside was a Seiko with a white dial and gold-tone bracelet, hands stopped at 11:41, and it was dry and unbroken.<br />- Teresa Ogle, age 44, was found dead from smoke inhalation after her house burned to the foundation on the night of May 19, 2003.<br />- Fire investigator Warren Pruett, with 31 years' experience, ruled the fire intentional based solely on visual observations and did not test for accelerant residue.<br />- Michael Clark was arrested within two weeks, unable to post a $200,000 bond, tried starting October 14, 2003, and convicted on October 23, 2003 after 11 hours of jury deliberation.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131627</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131627/0184.mp3" length="19262753" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sealed Evidence Bag Found in River - Who Framed Michael Clark?&#13;
&#13;
A sealed evidence bag with its red tamper strip intact washed up in a river holding a Seiko watch stopped at 11:41 that had been logged into the Pembrook County Sheriff's evidence room...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sealed Evidence Bag Found in River - Who Framed Michael Clark?<br /><br />A sealed evidence bag with its red tamper strip intact washed up in a river holding a Seiko watch stopped at 11:41 that had been logged into the Pembrook County Sheriff's evidence room months earlier - and that same watch was tied to a homicide that sent Michael Clark to prison for forty years. Who placed an unbroken evidence bag in the water, and what did it conceal about the fire that killed Teresa Ogle?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the May 19, 2003 house fire that killed Teresa Ogle through the arrest, trial, and conviction of Michael Clark, and we follow how one piece of evidence found in the river later altered the narrative. What did the sealed bag and the missing forensic steps mean for the verdict?<br /><br />Person: Teresa Ogle<br />Date: May 19, 2003<br />Location: 2218 Ashford Road, Granger, Pembrook County, Indiana<br />Status: Convicted defendant sentenced to 40 years (Michael Clark)<br />Event: Sealed evidence bag with Seiko watch found July 9, 2003<br /><br />- The sealed evidence bag was found by a fisherman on July 9, 2003 on the eastern bank of the Sutter River with its red tamper strip still intact.<br />- The watch inside was a Seiko with a white dial and gold-tone bracelet, hands stopped at 11:41, and it was dry and unbroken.<br />- Teresa Ogle, age 44, was found dead from smoke inhalation after her house burned to the foundation on the night of May 19, 2003.<br />- Fire investigator Warren Pruett, with 31 years' experience, ruled the fire intentional based solely on visual observations and did not test for accelerant residue.<br />- Michael Clark was arrested within two weeks, unable to post a $200,000 bond, tried starting October 14, 2003, and convicted on October 23, 2003 after 11 hours of jury deliberation.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1204</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Surveyor's Pin That Sent Her to Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-surveyor-s-pin-that-sent-her-to-prison--73131625</link><description><![CDATA[The Surveyor's Pin That Sent Her to Prison<br /><br />A single hospital visitor badge, nailed to an oak with a surveyor's pin, became the hinge of a homicide case and sent a 22-year-old to prison; the badge was logged at 9:47 PM on May 31, 2014, but who actually entered that timestamp into the system - and why - remained unanswered. What did the badge really prove, and how did a later review of the archive reveal a dead man’s credentials filing the crucial entry?<br /><br />In this episode, we narrate the sequence of events from the badge found on June 11 to the trial and post-conviction review, tracing the timelines, personnel, and digital records that shaped the case. How did one misread piece of evidence lock someone up for years, and what changed when a private investigator took another look?<br /><br />Person: Jessica Rafferty<br />Person: Warren Ogle<br />Date: May 31, 2014<br />Date: June 11, 2014<br />Location: St. Agatha Regional Medical Center<br /><br />- The badge bearing the name Jessica Rafferty was logged at St. Agatha Regional Medical Center at 9:47 PM on May 31, 2014.<br />- The badge was discovered pinned to a white oak tree on the edge of Gannett farmland and removed by county surveyor Douglas Coleman on June 11.<br />- Warren Ogle, 47, facilities supervisor at St. Agatha, was found dead between 10:00 PM and midnight on May 31, 2014, from blunt force trauma at the base of a service stairwell.<br />- The loading dock camera had been offline since May 28 due to a firmware update assigned to Warren Ogle.<br />- On June 8, 2014, someone accessed the badge archive system and filed the entry using credentials that belonged to Warren Ogle, who was already deceased according to hospital personnel records.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131625</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131625/0183.mp3" length="20440980" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Surveyor's Pin That Sent Her to Prison&#13;
&#13;
A single hospital visitor badge, nailed to an oak with a surveyor's pin, became the hinge of a homicide case and sent a 22-year-old to prison; the badge was logged at 9:47 PM on May 31, 2014, but who...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Surveyor's Pin That Sent Her to Prison<br /><br />A single hospital visitor badge, nailed to an oak with a surveyor's pin, became the hinge of a homicide case and sent a 22-year-old to prison; the badge was logged at 9:47 PM on May 31, 2014, but who actually entered that timestamp into the system - and why - remained unanswered. What did the badge really prove, and how did a later review of the archive reveal a dead man’s credentials filing the crucial entry?<br /><br />In this episode, we narrate the sequence of events from the badge found on June 11 to the trial and post-conviction review, tracing the timelines, personnel, and digital records that shaped the case. How did one misread piece of evidence lock someone up for years, and what changed when a private investigator took another look?<br /><br />Person: Jessica Rafferty<br />Person: Warren Ogle<br />Date: May 31, 2014<br />Date: June 11, 2014<br />Location: St. Agatha Regional Medical Center<br /><br />- The badge bearing the name Jessica Rafferty was logged at St. Agatha Regional Medical Center at 9:47 PM on May 31, 2014.<br />- The badge was discovered pinned to a white oak tree on the edge of Gannett farmland and removed by county surveyor Douglas Coleman on June 11.<br />- Warren Ogle, 47, facilities supervisor at St. Agatha, was found dead between 10:00 PM and midnight on May 31, 2014, from blunt force trauma at the base of a service stairwell.<br />- The loading dock camera had been offline since May 28 due to a firmware update assigned to Warren Ogle.<br />- On June 8, 2014, someone accessed the badge archive system and filed the entry using credentials that belonged to Warren Ogle, who was already deceased according to hospital personnel records.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1278</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Recalled Test, Ruined Life: How a Hidden Advisory Freed the Wrongly Convicted</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/recalled-test-ruined-life-how-a-hidden-advisory-freed-the-wrongly-convicted--73131622</link><description><![CDATA[Recalled Test, Ruined Life: How a Hidden Advisory Freed the Wrongly Convicted<br /><br />A single color-change field test put a quiet mother behind bars and a negative lab result still couldn't stop the prosecution from charging her with fraud - how could forty-one small blue tablets and a misfiled advisory rewrite a life? Who missed the binder on a shelf that would have changed everything?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from discovery to conviction risk: the discovery of a ziplock bag behind 214 Voss Street, a positive field test for methamphetamine, a later laboratory negative, and the prosecutorial shift to a fraud theory that kept the case alive. What document sat unread until three days before trial, and how did it alter the outcome?<br /><br />Person: Beverly Wallace<br />Location: 214 Voss Street, Weller, Mather County<br />Date: May 9 (discovery of the bag)<br />Item: Forty-one small blue tablets in a ziplock sandwich bag<br />Test: Narco-Sure color-reaction field test (color-positive), followed by laboratory negative<br /><br />- The bag was found in a three-inch gap behind a cinder-block foundation and had been there approximately four months by forensic estimation.<br />- Deputy Marcus Fell performed a Narco-Sure field test that produced a color-positive for methamphetamine within hours of the call.<br />- The laboratory analysis later determined the tablets were a legal phenylethylamine-based dietary supplement, not a controlled substance.<br />- The handwritten ledger contained a single column totaling approximately $4,000 across sixteen transactions and had no names or dates.<br />- Three days before trial, a forensic document examiner's handwriting analysis of the ledger was submitted by a legal aid organization.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131622</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131622/0182.mp3" length="17126146" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Recalled Test, Ruined Life: How a Hidden Advisory Freed the Wrongly Convicted&#13;
&#13;
A single color-change field test put a quiet mother behind bars and a negative lab result still couldn't stop the prosecution from charging her with fraud - how could...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Recalled Test, Ruined Life: How a Hidden Advisory Freed the Wrongly Convicted<br /><br />A single color-change field test put a quiet mother behind bars and a negative lab result still couldn't stop the prosecution from charging her with fraud - how could forty-one small blue tablets and a misfiled advisory rewrite a life? Who missed the binder on a shelf that would have changed everything?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from discovery to conviction risk: the discovery of a ziplock bag behind 214 Voss Street, a positive field test for methamphetamine, a later laboratory negative, and the prosecutorial shift to a fraud theory that kept the case alive. What document sat unread until three days before trial, and how did it alter the outcome?<br /><br />Person: Beverly Wallace<br />Location: 214 Voss Street, Weller, Mather County<br />Date: May 9 (discovery of the bag)<br />Item: Forty-one small blue tablets in a ziplock sandwich bag<br />Test: Narco-Sure color-reaction field test (color-positive), followed by laboratory negative<br /><br />- The bag was found in a three-inch gap behind a cinder-block foundation and had been there approximately four months by forensic estimation.<br />- Deputy Marcus Fell performed a Narco-Sure field test that produced a color-positive for methamphetamine within hours of the call.<br />- The laboratory analysis later determined the tablets were a legal phenylethylamine-based dietary supplement, not a controlled substance.<br />- The handwritten ledger contained a single column totaling approximately $4,000 across sixteen transactions and had no names or dates.<br />- Three days before trial, a forensic document examiner's handwriting analysis of the ledger was submitted by a legal aid organization.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1071</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Dry Drain, the Waterline, and the Unasked Phone Call</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dry-drain-the-waterline-and-the-unasked-phone-call--73131618</link><description><![CDATA[The Dry Drain, the Waterline, and the Unasked Phone Call<br /><br />A sixty-seven-year-old woman was found lying face up in a dry concrete culvert with a clear waterline eight inches above her body, her lungs full of chlorinated municipal water despite no nearby lake or river-how did she drown in a town with almost nowhere to drown? Who made the logged check-in call from her kitchen the morning before she died, and why was the back door unlocked contrary to her usual routine?<br /><br />In this episode, we present the sequence of events from the last phone call Margaret Hollins received to the forensic details that conflicted with the scene, and we follow the defense attorney who circled three overlooked facts that would change the case - can a single measurement in the report point to a very different explanation?<br /><br />Person: Margaret Hollins<br />Date: April 9 (found at 7:15 a.m.)<br />Location: Cutter Creek drainage corridor, Garrison, Kansas<br />Cause: Drowning; lungs contained chlorinated municipal water<br />Person: Shannon Stein (home health aide); last logged visit April 7 (entered at 9:10, departed at 11:47)<br /><br />- The waterline on the culvert walls was roughly eight inches above where Margaret's body lay.<br />- Rainfall for the entire week before her death: 0.2 inches.<br />- The nearest surface water is a livestock pond 43 miles northwest at the Featherstone cooperative.<br />- The Sunrise Companion Services system logged Shannon Stein's departure call at 11:47 on April 7, using Margaret's landline.<br />- Margaret's daughter, Tessa Hollins-Carr, last spoke to her on the night of April 7 and described her mother as compulsive about locking the back door.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131618</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131618/0181.mp3" length="18059449" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Dry Drain, the Waterline, and the Unasked Phone Call&#13;
&#13;
A sixty-seven-year-old woman was found lying face up in a dry concrete culvert with a clear waterline eight inches above her body, her lungs full of chlorinated municipal water despite no...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Dry Drain, the Waterline, and the Unasked Phone Call<br /><br />A sixty-seven-year-old woman was found lying face up in a dry concrete culvert with a clear waterline eight inches above her body, her lungs full of chlorinated municipal water despite no nearby lake or river-how did she drown in a town with almost nowhere to drown? Who made the logged check-in call from her kitchen the morning before she died, and why was the back door unlocked contrary to her usual routine?<br /><br />In this episode, we present the sequence of events from the last phone call Margaret Hollins received to the forensic details that conflicted with the scene, and we follow the defense attorney who circled three overlooked facts that would change the case - can a single measurement in the report point to a very different explanation?<br /><br />Person: Margaret Hollins<br />Date: April 9 (found at 7:15 a.m.)<br />Location: Cutter Creek drainage corridor, Garrison, Kansas<br />Cause: Drowning; lungs contained chlorinated municipal water<br />Person: Shannon Stein (home health aide); last logged visit April 7 (entered at 9:10, departed at 11:47)<br /><br />- The waterline on the culvert walls was roughly eight inches above where Margaret's body lay.<br />- Rainfall for the entire week before her death: 0.2 inches.<br />- The nearest surface water is a livestock pond 43 miles northwest at the Featherstone cooperative.<br />- The Sunrise Companion Services system logged Shannon Stein's departure call at 11:47 on April 7, using Margaret's landline.<br />- Margaret's daughter, Tessa Hollins-Carr, last spoke to her on the night of April 7 and described her mother as compulsive about locking the back door.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1129</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Upright Shoe: How One Witness Sent a Man to Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-upright-shoe-how-one-witness-sent-a-man-to-prison--73131614</link><description><![CDATA[The Upright Shoe: How One Witness Sent a Man to Prison<br /><br />A single black pump stood upright in the center of a blood stain with no body and no second shoe - an object that became the most argued item in Grover County courtroom history. The case turned on one witness who said she saw a man from across a dark street at 11:17 p.m., but her own optometrist's records later suggested she could not have seen clearly enough to be certain; how did that shoe and one uncertain sightline decide a man's fate?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the State of Ohio versus Casper, laying out the timeline, the witness account, the physical evidence found in a work van, and the surviving victim's injuries to ask whether what one woman thought she saw should have been enough to convict.<br /><br />Person: Brenda O'Connor<br />Person: Rachel Quinn<br />Person: Troy Casper<br />Date: March 6-7, 2011<br />Location: 914 Arnett Street, Grover County, Ohio<br /><br />- A single black pump was found upright in the center of a blood stain with no body and no second shoe.<br />- Rachel Quinn looked out her bedroom window at 11:17 p.m. on March 6, 2011, and estimated she watched a man beside a dark van for 30 to 40 seconds.<br />- Brenda O'Connor, age 26, was found alive six hours later in a crawl space three blocks away with a fractured orbital socket, broken collarbone, and two cracked ribs.<br />- Investigators searched Troy Casper's van 11 days after the attack and found a rubberized bypass bar consistent with the side door technique and an electrical cord spool consistent with the ligature used.<br />- Property manager Ed Toll confirmed Casper had worked at 914 Arnett in October 2010, was given the four-digit lockbox code, and the code was not changed afterward.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131614</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:24:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131614/0180.mp3" length="18074496" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Upright Shoe: How One Witness Sent a Man to Prison&#13;
&#13;
A single black pump stood upright in the center of a blood stain with no body and no second shoe - an object that became the most argued item in Grover County courtroom history. The case turned...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Upright Shoe: How One Witness Sent a Man to Prison<br /><br />A single black pump stood upright in the center of a blood stain with no body and no second shoe - an object that became the most argued item in Grover County courtroom history. The case turned on one witness who said she saw a man from across a dark street at 11:17 p.m., but her own optometrist's records later suggested she could not have seen clearly enough to be certain; how did that shoe and one uncertain sightline decide a man's fate?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the State of Ohio versus Casper, laying out the timeline, the witness account, the physical evidence found in a work van, and the surviving victim's injuries to ask whether what one woman thought she saw should have been enough to convict.<br /><br />Person: Brenda O'Connor<br />Person: Rachel Quinn<br />Person: Troy Casper<br />Date: March 6-7, 2011<br />Location: 914 Arnett Street, Grover County, Ohio<br /><br />- A single black pump was found upright in the center of a blood stain with no body and no second shoe.<br />- Rachel Quinn looked out her bedroom window at 11:17 p.m. on March 6, 2011, and estimated she watched a man beside a dark van for 30 to 40 seconds.<br />- Brenda O'Connor, age 26, was found alive six hours later in a crawl space three blocks away with a fractured orbital socket, broken collarbone, and two cracked ribs.<br />- Investigators searched Troy Casper's van 11 days after the attack and found a rubberized bypass bar consistent with the side door technique and an electrical cord spool consistent with the ligature used.<br />- Property manager Ed Toll confirmed Casper had worked at 914 Arnett in October 2010, was given the four-digit lockbox code, and the code was not changed afterward.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1130</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Chrysanthemum and the Phone: How a Flower Framed an Innocent Man</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-chrysanthemum-and-the-phone-how-a-flower-framed-an-innocent-man--73131613</link><description><![CDATA[The Chrysanthemum and the Phone: How a Flower Framed an Innocent Man<br /><br />A single fresh white chrysanthemum, stem wrapped in green florist's tape, was placed on a woman's folded hands in below-freezing darkness - and no footprints were ever found. That flower became the first clue and the key that eventually revealed a man was jailed for months; who placed it, and why, remains the central question.<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of evidence from the snowplow operator's discovery to the cell-tower record that convicted a man, and the overlooked records that pointed elsewhere - how did a roaming phone registration and a roadside assistance log steer investigators down the wrong path?<br /><br />Person: Karen Whitfield<br />Date: February (Tuesday at 3:11 AM)<br />Location: Milepost Nine, County Road 7<br />Person: John Quinn<br />Event: Cell tower registration at 2:41 AM<br /><br />- The body was found at 3:11 AM by snowplow operator Erin Bowers in twelve-degree air.<br />- The chrysanthemum was fresh with no frost damage and stem wrapped in blue-tinted forest green florist's tape.<br />- The ditch had been checked less than two hours earlier and was empty, creating a 93-minute window to place the flower.<br />- John Quinn’s phone registered with a cell tower 0.4 miles from Milepost Nine at 2:41 AM and was used as the prosecution’s central evidence.<br />- Lori Peterson called roadside assistance three days before the body was found from Route 12, two miles from Milepost Nine, a record noted but not pursued.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131613</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131613/0179.mp3" length="17657372" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Chrysanthemum and the Phone: How a Flower Framed an Innocent Man&#13;
&#13;
A single fresh white chrysanthemum, stem wrapped in green florist's tape, was placed on a woman's folded hands in below-freezing darkness - and no footprints were ever found. That...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Chrysanthemum and the Phone: How a Flower Framed an Innocent Man<br /><br />A single fresh white chrysanthemum, stem wrapped in green florist's tape, was placed on a woman's folded hands in below-freezing darkness - and no footprints were ever found. That flower became the first clue and the key that eventually revealed a man was jailed for months; who placed it, and why, remains the central question.<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of evidence from the snowplow operator's discovery to the cell-tower record that convicted a man, and the overlooked records that pointed elsewhere - how did a roaming phone registration and a roadside assistance log steer investigators down the wrong path?<br /><br />Person: Karen Whitfield<br />Date: February (Tuesday at 3:11 AM)<br />Location: Milepost Nine, County Road 7<br />Person: John Quinn<br />Event: Cell tower registration at 2:41 AM<br /><br />- The body was found at 3:11 AM by snowplow operator Erin Bowers in twelve-degree air.<br />- The chrysanthemum was fresh with no frost damage and stem wrapped in blue-tinted forest green florist's tape.<br />- The ditch had been checked less than two hours earlier and was empty, creating a 93-minute window to place the flower.<br />- John Quinn’s phone registered with a cell tower 0.4 miles from Milepost Nine at 2:41 AM and was used as the prosecution’s central evidence.<br />- Lori Peterson called roadside assistance three days before the body was found from Route 12, two miles from Milepost Nine, a record noted but not pursued.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1104</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Dead Witness: How a Forged Will Stole an Old Woman's Farm</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dead-witness-how-a-forged-will-stole-an-old-woman-s-farm--73131612</link><description><![CDATA[The Dead Witness: How a Forged Will Stole an Old Woman's Farm<br /><br />A dead man's name was signed to a will dated two days after he died, and a single yellow legal sheet folded and tucked beneath a ceramic rooster became the turning point in a Denton County fraud trial. Who put a deceased witness on a document that would transfer a 43-acre farm and roughly $94,000 away from the woman who cared for its owner?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the lineman who discovered the uncollected meter reading to the probate paralegal whose routine check exposed the impossibility, and we follow the evidence that led investigators to question the will's authenticity. How did a padlock purchase, a debit-card transaction, and the timing of signatures become the proof that a will could not have existed?<br /><br />Person: Florence Harpe<br />Date: January 9, 2023<br />Location: Varnell, Denton County, Texas<br />Case: contested will / fraud investigation<br />Person: Ralph Rice<br /><br />- Florence Harpe died on January 9, 2023 of cardiac failure at age 81 and was found six days later.<br />- The farmhouse sat on 43 acres and her checking account held roughly $94,000 at the time of death.<br />- A will from 2018 named nephew Ralph Rice, then 32 and an HVAC technician, as sole beneficiary of the farm and assets.<br />- A newly discovered will dated January 11, 2023 bore the signature of witness Carl Whitt, who died on or around January 7, 2023.<br />- A Masterlock combination padlock purchased at 11:47 AM on January 10, 2023 was paid with Randy Christensen’s debit card.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131612</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:54 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131612/0178.mp3" length="18340736" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Dead Witness: How a Forged Will Stole an Old Woman's Farm&#13;
&#13;
A dead man's name was signed to a will dated two days after he died, and a single yellow legal sheet folded and tucked beneath a ceramic rooster became the turning point in a Denton...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Dead Witness: How a Forged Will Stole an Old Woman's Farm<br /><br />A dead man's name was signed to a will dated two days after he died, and a single yellow legal sheet folded and tucked beneath a ceramic rooster became the turning point in a Denton County fraud trial. Who put a deceased witness on a document that would transfer a 43-acre farm and roughly $94,000 away from the woman who cared for its owner?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the lineman who discovered the uncollected meter reading to the probate paralegal whose routine check exposed the impossibility, and we follow the evidence that led investigators to question the will's authenticity. How did a padlock purchase, a debit-card transaction, and the timing of signatures become the proof that a will could not have existed?<br /><br />Person: Florence Harpe<br />Date: January 9, 2023<br />Location: Varnell, Denton County, Texas<br />Case: contested will / fraud investigation<br />Person: Ralph Rice<br /><br />- Florence Harpe died on January 9, 2023 of cardiac failure at age 81 and was found six days later.<br />- The farmhouse sat on 43 acres and her checking account held roughly $94,000 at the time of death.<br />- A will from 2018 named nephew Ralph Rice, then 32 and an HVAC technician, as sole beneficiary of the farm and assets.<br />- A newly discovered will dated January 11, 2023 bore the signature of witness Carl Whitt, who died on or around January 7, 2023.<br />- A Masterlock combination padlock purchased at 11:47 AM on January 10, 2023 was paid with Randy Christensen’s debit card.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1147</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Forensics Technician Who Framed a Neighbor: The Hammer Print Truth</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-forensics-technician-who-framed-a-neighbor-the-hammer-print-truth--73131611</link><description><![CDATA[The Forensics Technician Who Framed a Neighbor: The Hammer Print Truth<br /><br />Danger sits in plain sight: a single right-thumb print with seventeen comparison points on a ball-peen hammer sent a neighbor to trial, yet the evidence chain shows a torn glove and a logged "glove breach" by the county evidence technician who processed the tool-so whose thumb was really on that hammer?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events, the people involved, and the one documented detail that undercuts the prosecution's case: a torn right glove, a replaced glove, and a lifted print that matched the wrong person. How did a field note and one photograph change everything?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Kreel<br />Person: Douglas Myers<br />Person: Kelly Vogel<br />Date: December 4, 2011<br />Location: switchback trail near Kessler Reservoir<br /><br />- A runner found Sandra Kreel face-down in a drainage culvert at 6:15 AM on December 4, 2011.<br />- A ball-peen hammer was found about twenty feet from her body, half-hidden in dead grass.<br />- The hammer carried a single right-thumb fingerprint with seventeen comparison points.<br />- Douglas Myers, a twelve-year veteran evidence technician, logged "glove breach, R thumb, replaced before secondary processing."<br />- The defense investigator uncovered the pivotal rental records and a photograph that shifted the case nearly three years later.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131611</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:51 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131611/0177.mp3" length="19460866" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Forensics Technician Who Framed a Neighbor: The Hammer Print Truth&#13;
&#13;
Danger sits in plain sight: a single right-thumb print with seventeen comparison points on a ball-peen hammer sent a neighbor to trial, yet the evidence chain shows a torn glove...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Forensics Technician Who Framed a Neighbor: The Hammer Print Truth<br /><br />Danger sits in plain sight: a single right-thumb print with seventeen comparison points on a ball-peen hammer sent a neighbor to trial, yet the evidence chain shows a torn glove and a logged "glove breach" by the county evidence technician who processed the tool-so whose thumb was really on that hammer?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events, the people involved, and the one documented detail that undercuts the prosecution's case: a torn right glove, a replaced glove, and a lifted print that matched the wrong person. How did a field note and one photograph change everything?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Kreel<br />Person: Douglas Myers<br />Person: Kelly Vogel<br />Date: December 4, 2011<br />Location: switchback trail near Kessler Reservoir<br /><br />- A runner found Sandra Kreel face-down in a drainage culvert at 6:15 AM on December 4, 2011.<br />- A ball-peen hammer was found about twenty feet from her body, half-hidden in dead grass.<br />- The hammer carried a single right-thumb fingerprint with seventeen comparison points.<br />- Douglas Myers, a twelve-year veteran evidence technician, logged "glove breach, R thumb, replaced before secondary processing."<br />- The defense investigator uncovered the pivotal rental records and a photograph that shifted the case nearly three years later.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1217</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Folded and Dry in the Rain: The Button That Broke a Case</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/folded-and-dry-in-the-rain-the-button-that-broke-a-case--73131610</link><description><![CDATA[Folded and Dry in the Rain: The Button That Broke a Case<br /><br />The cardigan was folded and dry on a soaked concrete pad after thirty-one hours of rain - a contradiction that cracked a murder trial open and sent a man to prison for life. How could a deliberate fold and a single button change the course of an investigation into Marie Riley's death?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened to Marie Riley on the night of November 7, 2014, how Lori Novak found the folded burgundy cardigan at 8:17 a.m. on November 9, and how that photograph narrowed a four-hour window that reshaped leads and evidence. What did the folded garment and one small button ultimately reveal about the killer?<br /><br />Person: Marie Riley<br />Date: November 7-9, 2014<br />Location: 408 Aldermoor Drive, Sycamore Flats, Kellerton<br />Cause: Manual strangulation<br />Investigator: Detective Susan Halper<br /><br />- The cardigan was found folded with sleeves crossed at the base of a gas meter after thirty-one hours of continuous rain.<br />- Lori Novak photographed the dry folded cardigan at 8:17 a.m, on November 9, 2014.<br />- The medical examiner placed time of death between midnight and 4:00 a.m, on November 8, 2014.<br />- Detective Susan Halper wrote a four-hour window note: "placed after rain stopped."<br />- Philip Evans lived two hundred yards from the pedestrian bridge on Beckett Road and worked as a route auditor with irregular hours.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131610</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131610/0176.mp3" length="18591929" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Folded and Dry in the Rain: The Button That Broke a Case&#13;
&#13;
The cardigan was folded and dry on a soaked concrete pad after thirty-one hours of rain - a contradiction that cracked a murder trial open and sent a man to prison for life. How could a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Folded and Dry in the Rain: The Button That Broke a Case<br /><br />The cardigan was folded and dry on a soaked concrete pad after thirty-one hours of rain - a contradiction that cracked a murder trial open and sent a man to prison for life. How could a deliberate fold and a single button change the course of an investigation into Marie Riley's death?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened to Marie Riley on the night of November 7, 2014, how Lori Novak found the folded burgundy cardigan at 8:17 a.m. on November 9, and how that photograph narrowed a four-hour window that reshaped leads and evidence. What did the folded garment and one small button ultimately reveal about the killer?<br /><br />Person: Marie Riley<br />Date: November 7-9, 2014<br />Location: 408 Aldermoor Drive, Sycamore Flats, Kellerton<br />Cause: Manual strangulation<br />Investigator: Detective Susan Halper<br /><br />- The cardigan was found folded with sleeves crossed at the base of a gas meter after thirty-one hours of continuous rain.<br />- Lori Novak photographed the dry folded cardigan at 8:17 a.m, on November 9, 2014.<br />- The medical examiner placed time of death between midnight and 4:00 a.m, on November 8, 2014.<br />- Detective Susan Halper wrote a four-hour window note: "placed after rain stopped."<br />- Philip Evans lived two hundred yards from the pedestrian bridge on Beckett Road and worked as a route auditor with irregular hours.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1162</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sentence That Never Crossed The Jury: The Donetsk Translation Trap</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sentence-that-never-crossed-the-jury-the-donetsk-translation-trap--73131608</link><description><![CDATA[The Sentence That Never Crossed The Jury: The Donetsk Translation Trap<br /><br />Fear that one misunderstood phrase can overturn a life: a certified court interpreter rendered a Donetsk idiom as "I did not stop at the church," inserting the word "church" that Marilyn Novak never spoke - and that mistranslation became the prosecution's linchpin. How did a single translated sentence, invisible to the jury in oral testimony but fixed on page 112 of the transcript, drive seven years of legal consequences?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell who was involved, what unfolded that October morning, and how a translation choice shaped the case - leaving the listener to ask whether justice can survive a single linguistic error.<br /><br />Person: Marilyn Novak<br />Date: October 9, 2011<br />Location: Calvary Baptist Church fellowship hall<br />Interpreter: George Linn, certified, 11 years' experience<br />Prosecutor: Leonard Farris<br /><br />- Pamela Slater discovered Dennis Burns on the fellowship hall floor at 7:42 AM on a Saturday in October 2011.<br />- A ceramic communion tray base measured 36 centimeters across and weighed nearly 4 kilograms.<br />- The communion tray base was found roughly 8 feet from where Burns lay and 2.4 meters from where it had later been located in storage.<br />- Marilyn Novak had been in the United States roughly four years and attended Thursday literacy classes without missing a session in two years.<br />- The mistranslated phrase appears on page 112 of the transcript and was repeated by Assistant District Attorney Leonard Farris four times during cross-examination.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131608</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:43 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131608/0175.mp3" length="18944687" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Sentence That Never Crossed The Jury: The Donetsk Translation Trap&#13;
&#13;
Fear that one misunderstood phrase can overturn a life: a certified court interpreter rendered a Donetsk idiom as "I did not stop at the church," inserting the word "church"...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Sentence That Never Crossed The Jury: The Donetsk Translation Trap<br /><br />Fear that one misunderstood phrase can overturn a life: a certified court interpreter rendered a Donetsk idiom as "I did not stop at the church," inserting the word "church" that Marilyn Novak never spoke - and that mistranslation became the prosecution's linchpin. How did a single translated sentence, invisible to the jury in oral testimony but fixed on page 112 of the transcript, drive seven years of legal consequences?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell who was involved, what unfolded that October morning, and how a translation choice shaped the case - leaving the listener to ask whether justice can survive a single linguistic error.<br /><br />Person: Marilyn Novak<br />Date: October 9, 2011<br />Location: Calvary Baptist Church fellowship hall<br />Interpreter: George Linn, certified, 11 years' experience<br />Prosecutor: Leonard Farris<br /><br />- Pamela Slater discovered Dennis Burns on the fellowship hall floor at 7:42 AM on a Saturday in October 2011.<br />- A ceramic communion tray base measured 36 centimeters across and weighed nearly 4 kilograms.<br />- The communion tray base was found roughly 8 feet from where Burns lay and 2.4 meters from where it had later been located in storage.<br />- Marilyn Novak had been in the United States roughly four years and attended Thursday literacy classes without missing a session in two years.<br />- The mistranslated phrase appears on page 112 of the transcript and was repeated by Assistant District Attorney Leonard Farris four times during cross-examination.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1184</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Folded Like a Pillow: How a Cardigan Sent Her to Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/folded-like-a-pillow-how-a-cardigan-sent-her-to-prison--73131606</link><description><![CDATA[Folded Like a Pillow: How a Cardigan Sent Her to Prison<br /><br />A folded men's cardigan placed like a pillow beneath a murder victim became the single detail that sent an innocent county clerk to prison for twenty-two years. The sweater was laundered, the label cut out, and a second blood type on a nearby rock - present in about eleven percent of the population - tied the case to Darlene Norris; but did it really belong to the killer?<br /><br />In this episode, we chronicle the discovery at Harlow Creek, the initial forensic profile, and the investigative threads that led from a missing alibi and a disputed argument to a conviction, then onward to the evidence that would unravel the verdict. How did a recovered hammer and the bones of a second woman overturn the story the prosecution built?<br /><br />Date: September 9, 1987<br />Location: Harlow Creek, Pembrook County<br />Victim: Linda Pruett, 44<br />Convicted: Darlene Norris, 53, sentenced to 22 years<br />Medical Examiner: Dr. Patricia Cobb<br /><br />- The cardigan was men's, large, wool with a herringbone weave and tobacco brown color, laundered and with the label cut out.<br />- Two rocks near the body carried blood: the rock by the head had type O (victim), the second rock three feet away had type B, present in about 11% of the population.<br />- Linda Pruett left her office on Fenwick Street at 6:15 PM the previous evening; less than one mile separated her office from the creek bed where she was found.<br />- A Tuesday morning diner regular, Pruett missed her usual Patton's Table visit on Tuesday, September 8, which later became testimony.<br />- Groundskeeper Edward Sanders had been dismissed on September 5 and still had personal tools in a maintenance shed near the trail; his access had not been formally revoked.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131606</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131606/0174.mp3" length="21333741" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Folded Like a Pillow: How a Cardigan Sent Her to Prison&#13;
&#13;
A folded men's cardigan placed like a pillow beneath a murder victim became the single detail that sent an innocent county clerk to prison for twenty-two years. The sweater was laundered, the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Folded Like a Pillow: How a Cardigan Sent Her to Prison<br /><br />A folded men's cardigan placed like a pillow beneath a murder victim became the single detail that sent an innocent county clerk to prison for twenty-two years. The sweater was laundered, the label cut out, and a second blood type on a nearby rock - present in about eleven percent of the population - tied the case to Darlene Norris; but did it really belong to the killer?<br /><br />In this episode, we chronicle the discovery at Harlow Creek, the initial forensic profile, and the investigative threads that led from a missing alibi and a disputed argument to a conviction, then onward to the evidence that would unravel the verdict. How did a recovered hammer and the bones of a second woman overturn the story the prosecution built?<br /><br />Date: September 9, 1987<br />Location: Harlow Creek, Pembrook County<br />Victim: Linda Pruett, 44<br />Convicted: Darlene Norris, 53, sentenced to 22 years<br />Medical Examiner: Dr. Patricia Cobb<br /><br />- The cardigan was men's, large, wool with a herringbone weave and tobacco brown color, laundered and with the label cut out.<br />- Two rocks near the body carried blood: the rock by the head had type O (victim), the second rock three feet away had type B, present in about 11% of the population.<br />- Linda Pruett left her office on Fenwick Street at 6:15 PM the previous evening; less than one mile separated her office from the creek bed where she was found.<br />- A Tuesday morning diner regular, Pruett missed her usual Patton's Table visit on Tuesday, September 8, which later became testimony.<br />- Groundskeeper Edward Sanders had been dismissed on September 5 and still had personal tools in a maintenance shed near the trail; his access had not been formally revoked.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1334</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Polaroid in the River: How One Photo Framed a Killer</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-polaroid-in-the-river-how-one-photo-framed-a-killer--73131604</link><description><![CDATA[The Polaroid in the River: How One Photo Framed a Killer<br /><br />A single dated Polaroid found in a leather handbag wedged under a willow root in the Sable River became the pivot of a missing-persons case: the photo was stamped July 22, Nora Bateman had been missing nine days when the bag was recovered, and Nora did not own a Polaroid camera. How could a low-angle image taken against a kitchen baseboard end up in a river - and who deliberately placed the bag there?<br /><br />In this episode, we recount the sequence of discoveries from the morning a fisherman found the handbag through the arrests and evidence that followed, following the questions the photograph raised about access, placement, and motive. Was the person living above Nora the obvious suspect, or did the Polaroid point investigators somewhere else?<br /><br />Person: Nora Bateman<br />Age: 29<br />Location: Fenwick Court, Oleander Falls<br />Date missing: August 5, 2011<br />Evidence found: Polaroid dated July 22 inside a leather handbag recovered August 14, 2011<br /><br />- The handbag with the Polaroid and a house key was pulled from the Sable River before 6:00 AM on August 14, 2011.<br />- Nora Bateman missed two consecutive shifts and was welfare-checked on the morning of August 7, 2011; her car was in the parking lot and the duplex was locked.<br />- The Polaroid showed a woman photographed at low angle from floor level and had a date stamp of July 22, 2011, two weeks before Nora vanished.<br />- Stanley Underwood, age 22 and Nora’s upstairs neighbor, was arrested on August 21, 2011, sixteen days after Nora was last seen.<br />- A Fenwick Court work order showed Coldstream Systems serviced the building’s air handler units on June 30, 2011.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131604</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:35 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131604/0173.mp3" length="19500572" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Polaroid in the River: How One Photo Framed a Killer&#13;
&#13;
A single dated Polaroid found in a leather handbag wedged under a willow root in the Sable River became the pivot of a missing-persons case: the photo was stamped July 22, Nora Bateman had...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Polaroid in the River: How One Photo Framed a Killer<br /><br />A single dated Polaroid found in a leather handbag wedged under a willow root in the Sable River became the pivot of a missing-persons case: the photo was stamped July 22, Nora Bateman had been missing nine days when the bag was recovered, and Nora did not own a Polaroid camera. How could a low-angle image taken against a kitchen baseboard end up in a river - and who deliberately placed the bag there?<br /><br />In this episode, we recount the sequence of discoveries from the morning a fisherman found the handbag through the arrests and evidence that followed, following the questions the photograph raised about access, placement, and motive. Was the person living above Nora the obvious suspect, or did the Polaroid point investigators somewhere else?<br /><br />Person: Nora Bateman<br />Age: 29<br />Location: Fenwick Court, Oleander Falls<br />Date missing: August 5, 2011<br />Evidence found: Polaroid dated July 22 inside a leather handbag recovered August 14, 2011<br /><br />- The handbag with the Polaroid and a house key was pulled from the Sable River before 6:00 AM on August 14, 2011.<br />- Nora Bateman missed two consecutive shifts and was welfare-checked on the morning of August 7, 2011; her car was in the parking lot and the duplex was locked.<br />- The Polaroid showed a woman photographed at low angle from floor level and had a date stamp of July 22, 2011, two weeks before Nora vanished.<br />- Stanley Underwood, age 22 and Nora’s upstairs neighbor, was arrested on August 21, 2011, sixteen days after Nora was last seen.<br />- A Fenwick Court work order showed Coldstream Systems serviced the building’s air handler units on June 30, 2011.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1219</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Surveyor's Rod and the Wrongly Convicted Man</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-surveyor-s-rod-and-the-wrongly-convicted-man--73131603</link><description><![CDATA[The Surveyor's Rod and the Wrongly Convicted Man<br /><br />Fear that something ordinary will undo a life: a county instrument rod logged back into storage on June 17 was found perfectly vertical beside a woman's body eleven miles from its last assigned job site-what could that rod reveal about the case? Who placed MSC-114 in the Calloway parcel, and how did it become the pivot of a prosecution?<br /><br />In this episode, we recount the timeline from the moment Wade Crawford discovered instrument rod MSC-114 beside Donna Helms on July 9, 2011, through the disappearance on June 28 and the arrest of Michael Reynolds on July 14; what emerges is the question of whether the rod's paper trail and storage vulnerabilities were truly understood by investigators and prosecutors.<br /><br />Person: Donna Helms<br />Date: June 28, 2011 (last confirmed activity) and July 9, 2011 (discovery)<br />Location: Calloway parcel, Merritt County (rod found at east edge)<br />Person: Michael Reynolds<br />Case: Docket 11-CR-4408, Judge Sandra Fisk presiding<br /><br />- Donna Helms was 31 years old and worked as a dental hygienist in Crale.<br />- Instrument rod MSC-114 was logged back into storage on June 17 after checkout on June 3 by Dennis Albright.<br />- MSC-114 was found upright in tall grass six feet from Donna Helms's remains at the Calloway parcel on July 9, 2011.<br />- Michael Reynolds was arrested July 14, arraigned July 22, with trial beginning November 7; his alibi placed him in Dunbar Township with a ticket logged at 4:50 p.m. and departure at 5:15 p.m., nineteen miles from Hargrove Lane.<br />- A single fiber from Donna's jacket was found consistent with the lining of an Apex work glove; the fiber was qualified by the prosecution's expert as "consistent with, not definitive."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131603</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131603/0172.mp3" length="18808850" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Surveyor's Rod and the Wrongly Convicted Man&#13;
&#13;
Fear that something ordinary will undo a life: a county instrument rod logged back into storage on June 17 was found perfectly vertical beside a woman's body eleven miles from its last assigned job...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Surveyor's Rod and the Wrongly Convicted Man<br /><br />Fear that something ordinary will undo a life: a county instrument rod logged back into storage on June 17 was found perfectly vertical beside a woman's body eleven miles from its last assigned job site-what could that rod reveal about the case? Who placed MSC-114 in the Calloway parcel, and how did it become the pivot of a prosecution?<br /><br />In this episode, we recount the timeline from the moment Wade Crawford discovered instrument rod MSC-114 beside Donna Helms on July 9, 2011, through the disappearance on June 28 and the arrest of Michael Reynolds on July 14; what emerges is the question of whether the rod's paper trail and storage vulnerabilities were truly understood by investigators and prosecutors.<br /><br />Person: Donna Helms<br />Date: June 28, 2011 (last confirmed activity) and July 9, 2011 (discovery)<br />Location: Calloway parcel, Merritt County (rod found at east edge)<br />Person: Michael Reynolds<br />Case: Docket 11-CR-4408, Judge Sandra Fisk presiding<br /><br />- Donna Helms was 31 years old and worked as a dental hygienist in Crale.<br />- Instrument rod MSC-114 was logged back into storage on June 17 after checkout on June 3 by Dennis Albright.<br />- MSC-114 was found upright in tall grass six feet from Donna Helms's remains at the Calloway parcel on July 9, 2011.<br />- Michael Reynolds was arrested July 14, arraigned July 22, with trial beginning November 7; his alibi placed him in Dunbar Township with a ticket logged at 4:50 p.m. and departure at 5:15 p.m., nineteen miles from Hargrove Lane.<br />- A single fiber from Donna's jacket was found consistent with the lining of an Apex work glove; the fiber was qualified by the prosecution's expert as "consistent with, not definitive."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1176</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Sealed in the Tank: The Watch That Framed a Neighbor</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/sealed-in-the-tank-the-watch-that-framed-a-neighbor--73131602</link><description><![CDATA[Sealed in the Tank: The Watch That Framed a Neighbor<br /><br />A single wristwatch, sealed in a plastic bag and still running, turned up in a septic tank on Gillam Road after fourteen months of a woman's disappearance - and within weeks a sixty-two-year-old neighbor was arrested for murder. How did one object link a missing person to a locked tank and put the wrong woman behind bars?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the morning Marvin Tillman found the watch to the arrest of Debra Erickson, tracing the evidence, the disputed billing letters, and the missed leads that kept a critical name-Lloyd O'Connor-out of the early inquiry. Which detail cracked the prosecution's case wide open?<br /><br />Person: Debra Erickson<br />Person: Sandra Pruitt<br />Person: Marvin Tillman<br />Date: June 2011 (watch discovery)<br />Location: Gillam Road<br /><br />- The watch was discovered at 6:47 AM on a Wednesday morning in June 2011 inside the secondary compartment of a septic tank.<br />- The watch was sealed inside a clear plastic bag, still running, and sitting on a concrete shelf above the waterline.<br />- Investigators traced the engraved silver watch with a burgundy dial to Sandra Pruitt, who had been missing for fourteen months.<br />- Debra Erickson, age sixty-two, had lived on Gillam Road for eleven years and was arrested eleven days after the watch was found.<br />- Lloyd O'Connor, age fifty-one, was a former owner of Hendrick Well and Septic who had serviced Erickson's tank three times between 2005 and 2008 and whose missing proprietary tools were never accounted for.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131602</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:27 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131602/0171.mp3" length="19582492" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Sealed in the Tank: The Watch That Framed a Neighbor&#13;
&#13;
A single wristwatch, sealed in a plastic bag and still running, turned up in a septic tank on Gillam Road after fourteen months of a woman's disappearance - and within weeks a sixty-two-year-old...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Sealed in the Tank: The Watch That Framed a Neighbor<br /><br />A single wristwatch, sealed in a plastic bag and still running, turned up in a septic tank on Gillam Road after fourteen months of a woman's disappearance - and within weeks a sixty-two-year-old neighbor was arrested for murder. How did one object link a missing person to a locked tank and put the wrong woman behind bars?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the morning Marvin Tillman found the watch to the arrest of Debra Erickson, tracing the evidence, the disputed billing letters, and the missed leads that kept a critical name-Lloyd O'Connor-out of the early inquiry. Which detail cracked the prosecution's case wide open?<br /><br />Person: Debra Erickson<br />Person: Sandra Pruitt<br />Person: Marvin Tillman<br />Date: June 2011 (watch discovery)<br />Location: Gillam Road<br /><br />- The watch was discovered at 6:47 AM on a Wednesday morning in June 2011 inside the secondary compartment of a septic tank.<br />- The watch was sealed inside a clear plastic bag, still running, and sitting on a concrete shelf above the waterline.<br />- Investigators traced the engraved silver watch with a burgundy dial to Sandra Pruitt, who had been missing for fourteen months.<br />- Debra Erickson, age sixty-two, had lived on Gillam Road for eleven years and was arrested eleven days after the watch was found.<br />- Lloyd O'Connor, age fifty-one, was a former owner of Hendrick Well and Septic who had serviced Erickson's tank three times between 2005 and 2008 and whose missing proprietary tools were never accounted for.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1224</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sneaker Bow That Unraveled a Murder Conviction</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sneaker-bow-that-unraveled-a-murder-conviction--73131600</link><description><![CDATA[The Sneaker Bow That Unraveled a Murder Conviction<br /><br />A single tan canvas sneaker, women's size seven, right foot, washed up thirty feet from shore with its laces tied in a neat bow - a detail that later overturned a murder conviction. Which hidden note and who noticed that tied bow would flip a case built in forty-eight hours and expose the real killer?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from Patty Voss's last night to the discovery that changed everything, laying out the timeline, the eyewitness accounts, and the overlooked evidence that raised the central question: how did a tied bow and a buried handwritten note shift blame from the convicted to the true perpetrator?<br /><br />Person: Patty Voss<br />Date: May 9, 2011<br />Location: Nestor River, eastern bank<br />Person: Connie Doyle<br />Person: Edward White<br /><br />- The sneaker was found thirty feet from shore and half-submerged in the shallows.<br />- The sneaker was a women's size seven, right foot, with the laces tied in a neat bow.<br />- Patty Voss exited Grover's Bend Pharmacy at 9:27 PM on May 8, 2011, per the store's security timestamp.<br />- Patty's mother first filed a missing persons report at 7:45 AM on May 9, 2011.<br />- A handwritten note buried in an evidence folder was found by a paralegal nearly three years after the murder.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131600</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131600/0170.mp3" length="18391309" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Sneaker Bow That Unraveled a Murder Conviction&#13;
&#13;
A single tan canvas sneaker, women's size seven, right foot, washed up thirty feet from shore with its laces tied in a neat bow - a detail that later overturned a murder conviction. Which hidden...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Sneaker Bow That Unraveled a Murder Conviction<br /><br />A single tan canvas sneaker, women's size seven, right foot, washed up thirty feet from shore with its laces tied in a neat bow - a detail that later overturned a murder conviction. Which hidden note and who noticed that tied bow would flip a case built in forty-eight hours and expose the real killer?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from Patty Voss's last night to the discovery that changed everything, laying out the timeline, the eyewitness accounts, and the overlooked evidence that raised the central question: how did a tied bow and a buried handwritten note shift blame from the convicted to the true perpetrator?<br /><br />Person: Patty Voss<br />Date: May 9, 2011<br />Location: Nestor River, eastern bank<br />Person: Connie Doyle<br />Person: Edward White<br /><br />- The sneaker was found thirty feet from shore and half-submerged in the shallows.<br />- The sneaker was a women's size seven, right foot, with the laces tied in a neat bow.<br />- Patty Voss exited Grover's Bend Pharmacy at 9:27 PM on May 8, 2011, per the store's security timestamp.<br />- Patty's mother first filed a missing persons report at 7:45 AM on May 9, 2011.<br />- A handwritten note buried in an evidence folder was found by a paralegal nearly three years after the murder.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1150</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Shoe on the Hood: How a Single Pump Cracked a Murder Case</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-shoe-on-the-hood-how-a-single-pump-cracked-a-murder-case--73131599</link><description><![CDATA[The Shoe on the Hood: How a Single Pump Cracked a Murder Case<br /><br />The single beige pump, size seven, with its heel snapped off and tucked inside was found placed - not dropped - on a Buick hood at 6:41 a.m. on April 9, 2014, and a darkened bloodstain lay beneath it; who left that shoe and why does it point straight at a co-worker who asked what time the victim left the night she died?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the sequence of discoveries from a deserted apartment with keys and phone left on the counter to a body found five days later in a drainage ditch, and how four pieces of evidence converged to raise one central question: did routine workplace interactions hide lethal intent?<br /><br />Person: Angela Boyd<br />Date: April 9, 2014<br />Location: Prentice Street and Route Nine<br />Status: Homicide by strangulation<br />Person: Michael Simmons<br /><br />- A beige women's pump, size seven, heel snapped off and placed inside the shoe, was found on a car hood at 6:41 a.m, on April 9, 2014.<br />- Angela Boyd’s keys, phone, purse, and coat were found inside her first-floor apartment at 1140 Prentice Street, with a broken glass in the sink and a bloodstain low on a door frame.<br />- Angela Boyd’s time of death was between 8:00 p.m. and midnight on April 8, 2014, according to Dr. Patricia Osei.<br />- The sole of Angela’s right foot showed an abrasion pattern with pea stone, a surface found on the patio behind Trask Environmental’s Foundry Row facility but not at the Route Nine ditch where her body was recovered.<br />- Approximately six weeks before her disappearance Angela filed an informal complaint that Michael Simmons was stopping at her desk for non-work reasons, and two days before her death Simmons asked coworker Deborah Crane what time Angela usually left on Tuesdays.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131599</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:19 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131599/0169.mp3" length="18871126" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Shoe on the Hood: How a Single Pump Cracked a Murder Case&#13;
&#13;
The single beige pump, size seven, with its heel snapped off and tucked inside was found placed - not dropped - on a Buick hood at 6:41 a.m. on April 9, 2014, and a darkened bloodstain...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Shoe on the Hood: How a Single Pump Cracked a Murder Case<br /><br />The single beige pump, size seven, with its heel snapped off and tucked inside was found placed - not dropped - on a Buick hood at 6:41 a.m. on April 9, 2014, and a darkened bloodstain lay beneath it; who left that shoe and why does it point straight at a co-worker who asked what time the victim left the night she died?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the sequence of discoveries from a deserted apartment with keys and phone left on the counter to a body found five days later in a drainage ditch, and how four pieces of evidence converged to raise one central question: did routine workplace interactions hide lethal intent?<br /><br />Person: Angela Boyd<br />Date: April 9, 2014<br />Location: Prentice Street and Route Nine<br />Status: Homicide by strangulation<br />Person: Michael Simmons<br /><br />- A beige women's pump, size seven, heel snapped off and placed inside the shoe, was found on a car hood at 6:41 a.m, on April 9, 2014.<br />- Angela Boyd’s keys, phone, purse, and coat were found inside her first-floor apartment at 1140 Prentice Street, with a broken glass in the sink and a bloodstain low on a door frame.<br />- Angela Boyd’s time of death was between 8:00 p.m. and midnight on April 8, 2014, according to Dr. Patricia Osei.<br />- The sole of Angela’s right foot showed an abrasion pattern with pea stone, a surface found on the patio behind Trask Environmental’s Foundry Row facility but not at the Route Nine ditch where her body was recovered.<br />- Approximately six weeks before her disappearance Angela filed an informal complaint that Michael Simmons was stopping at her desk for non-work reasons, and two days before her death Simmons asked coworker Deborah Crane what time Angela usually left on Tuesdays.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1180</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Warm Dish, Cold Alibi: How a Casserole Broke a Conviction</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/warm-dish-cold-alibi-how-a-casserole-broke-a-conviction--73131596</link><description><![CDATA[Warm Dish, Cold Alibi: How a Casserole Broke a Conviction<br /><br />A warm Pyrex casserole dish, found with an inch of snow on its lid in eleven-degree air and no heat source within a quarter mile, became the single physical fact that unraveled a murder conviction and sent an innocent woman to prison for seven years. Who put that dish on Brickhouse Pike, and why did it contradict every other piece of the prosecution's case?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the morning Vernon Gray found the dish to the trial that focused almost entirely on it, presenting the central anomaly that neither prosecutors, the defense, nor the man who later confessed could explain: how the dish stayed warm. What does that unexplained warmth reveal about guilt, evidence, and mistake?<br /><br />Person: Patricia Vane<br />Age: 34<br />Date of discovery (dish): March 14<br />Temperature overnight low: 11 degrees Fahrenheit<br />Distance to nearest structure reported: quarter mile<br /><br />- Vernon Gray found a Pyrex casserole dish on a frozen drainage slope at roughly 6:00 a.m, on March 14.<br />- The dish had an inch of snow on the lid but felt warm when Gray pressed his bare palm to the glass.<br />- Patricia Vane was found dead on the kitchen floor on March 6 from blunt force trauma.<br />- Roger Stewart had a receipt dated March 7 for a Pyrex casserole dish with a blue flower print on the lid.<br />- Valerie Keller called Patricia's landline on March 4 at 10:50 p.m.; the call lasted 4 minutes and 12 seconds.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131596</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131596/0168.mp3" length="17117369" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Warm Dish, Cold Alibi: How a Casserole Broke a Conviction&#13;
&#13;
A warm Pyrex casserole dish, found with an inch of snow on its lid in eleven-degree air and no heat source within a quarter mile, became the single physical fact that unraveled a murder...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Warm Dish, Cold Alibi: How a Casserole Broke a Conviction<br /><br />A warm Pyrex casserole dish, found with an inch of snow on its lid in eleven-degree air and no heat source within a quarter mile, became the single physical fact that unraveled a murder conviction and sent an innocent woman to prison for seven years. Who put that dish on Brickhouse Pike, and why did it contradict every other piece of the prosecution's case?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the morning Vernon Gray found the dish to the trial that focused almost entirely on it, presenting the central anomaly that neither prosecutors, the defense, nor the man who later confessed could explain: how the dish stayed warm. What does that unexplained warmth reveal about guilt, evidence, and mistake?<br /><br />Person: Patricia Vane<br />Age: 34<br />Date of discovery (dish): March 14<br />Temperature overnight low: 11 degrees Fahrenheit<br />Distance to nearest structure reported: quarter mile<br /><br />- Vernon Gray found a Pyrex casserole dish on a frozen drainage slope at roughly 6:00 a.m, on March 14.<br />- The dish had an inch of snow on the lid but felt warm when Gray pressed his bare palm to the glass.<br />- Patricia Vane was found dead on the kitchen floor on March 6 from blunt force trauma.<br />- Roger Stewart had a receipt dated March 7 for a Pyrex casserole dish with a blue flower print on the lid.<br />- Valerie Keller called Patricia's landline on March 4 at 10:50 p.m.; the call lasted 4 minutes and 12 seconds.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1070</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pole, the Shoe, and a Murder No One Could Explain</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pole-the-shoe-and-a-murder-no-one-could-explain--73131595</link><description><![CDATA[The Pole, the Shoe, and a Murder No One Could Explain<br /><br />The image of a pale green canvas shoe balanced upright nineteen feet up on a utility crossarm turns a routine patrol into the single piece of evidence that would both save and complicate a murder case. How did a size seven sneaker end up perfectly placed above Weller Street eleven days after Linda Marsh disappeared, with no ladder marks, no nearby structure, and no clear explanation?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Linda Marsh's last walk on January 23, 2019 to the discovery on February 5, 2019, and the weeks of investigation and trial that followed, asking whether the shoe is an accidental clue or a deliberate message that alters everything.<br /><br />Person: Linda Marsh<br />Date: January 23, 2019 (disappearance); February 5, 2019 (shoe found)<br />Location: Weller Street crossarm, 19 feet above ground<br />Occupation: Dental hygienist<br />Investigator: Detective Ray Coburn<br /><br />- Linda Marsh left home at approximately 6:15 PM wearing pale green canvas sneakers, size 7.<br />- Her left shoe was found at the Fenwick Road trailhead within days of her disappearance.<br />- The right shoe was discovered upright on a utility pole crossarm 19 feet above Weller Street on February 5, 2019.<br />- There were no ladder marks on the pole below and no structure within 12 feet from which the shoe could have been placed or thrown.<br />- Monica Porter, a Crestfield Power and Light lineman, photographed the shoe in situ before touching it during a routine inspection.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131595</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131595/0167.mp3" length="19470061" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Pole, the Shoe, and a Murder No One Could Explain&#13;
&#13;
The image of a pale green canvas shoe balanced upright nineteen feet up on a utility crossarm turns a routine patrol into the single piece of evidence that would both save and complicate a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Pole, the Shoe, and a Murder No One Could Explain<br /><br />The image of a pale green canvas shoe balanced upright nineteen feet up on a utility crossarm turns a routine patrol into the single piece of evidence that would both save and complicate a murder case. How did a size seven sneaker end up perfectly placed above Weller Street eleven days after Linda Marsh disappeared, with no ladder marks, no nearby structure, and no clear explanation?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Linda Marsh's last walk on January 23, 2019 to the discovery on February 5, 2019, and the weeks of investigation and trial that followed, asking whether the shoe is an accidental clue or a deliberate message that alters everything.<br /><br />Person: Linda Marsh<br />Date: January 23, 2019 (disappearance); February 5, 2019 (shoe found)<br />Location: Weller Street crossarm, 19 feet above ground<br />Occupation: Dental hygienist<br />Investigator: Detective Ray Coburn<br /><br />- Linda Marsh left home at approximately 6:15 PM wearing pale green canvas sneakers, size 7.<br />- Her left shoe was found at the Fenwick Road trailhead within days of her disappearance.<br />- The right shoe was discovered upright on a utility pole crossarm 19 feet above Weller Street on February 5, 2019.<br />- There were no ladder marks on the pole below and no structure within 12 feet from which the shoe could have been placed or thrown.<br />- Monica Porter, a Crestfield Power and Light lineman, photographed the shoe in situ before touching it during a routine inspection.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1217</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ticket That Sent Two People To Prison - Who Lied?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ticket-that-sent-two-people-to-prison-who-lied--73131594</link><description><![CDATA[The Ticket That Sent Two People To Prison - Who Lied?<br /><br />A crisp transit transfer stamped 9:47 PM was found perfectly dry on a dead nurse’s chest after nine hours in eleven-degree air - and that single ticket sent one person to prison for four years and later put another behind bars for life. Who placed the ticket, and how could a paper timestamp that “should not have existed” determine two people's fates?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the evidence, the timeline, and the courtroom moments that followed Donna Speirs’s death to ask whether the ticket told the truth - or masked it. What hidden number in that linchpin piece of evidence went unnoticed for years, and how did it change the course of two prosecutions?<br /><br />Person: Donna Speirs, age 41<br />Date: January 18, 2011 (body found at 6:15 AM)<br />Location: Embankment behind the Fenwick Mill building, near the Sackett River, Millhaven, Ohio<br />Case: Homicide by single blunt-force strike to posterior skull; time of death estimated 9:45-11:15 PM on January 17, 2011<br />Evidence: Transit transfer ticket stamped 9:47 PM for Route 12, found dry and centered on victim’s chest<br /><br />- The transfer ticket was stamped 9:47 PM the night Donna’s shift ended at 9:30 PM.<br />- Donna’s body was discovered at 6:15 AM after nine hours in eleven-degree air with no frost or moisture on the ticket.<br />- Lauren Thompson was arrested on January 28, 2011, eleven days after the body was found.<br />- Lauren had a pharmacy receipt timestamped 9:56 PM from Depot Street pharmacy, less than a mile from the Sackett River stop.<br />- The medical examiner recorded a single blow to the posterior skull and documented the wound angle that later proved significant.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131594</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131594/0166.mp3" length="18956807" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Ticket That Sent Two People To Prison - Who Lied?&#13;
&#13;
A crisp transit transfer stamped 9:47 PM was found perfectly dry on a dead nurse’s chest after nine hours in eleven-degree air - and that single ticket sent one person to prison for four years...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Ticket That Sent Two People To Prison - Who Lied?<br /><br />A crisp transit transfer stamped 9:47 PM was found perfectly dry on a dead nurse’s chest after nine hours in eleven-degree air - and that single ticket sent one person to prison for four years and later put another behind bars for life. Who placed the ticket, and how could a paper timestamp that “should not have existed” determine two people's fates?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the evidence, the timeline, and the courtroom moments that followed Donna Speirs’s death to ask whether the ticket told the truth - or masked it. What hidden number in that linchpin piece of evidence went unnoticed for years, and how did it change the course of two prosecutions?<br /><br />Person: Donna Speirs, age 41<br />Date: January 18, 2011 (body found at 6:15 AM)<br />Location: Embankment behind the Fenwick Mill building, near the Sackett River, Millhaven, Ohio<br />Case: Homicide by single blunt-force strike to posterior skull; time of death estimated 9:45-11:15 PM on January 17, 2011<br />Evidence: Transit transfer ticket stamped 9:47 PM for Route 12, found dry and centered on victim’s chest<br /><br />- The transfer ticket was stamped 9:47 PM the night Donna’s shift ended at 9:30 PM.<br />- Donna’s body was discovered at 6:15 AM after nine hours in eleven-degree air with no frost or moisture on the ticket.<br />- Lauren Thompson was arrested on January 28, 2011, eleven days after the body was found.<br />- Lauren had a pharmacy receipt timestamped 9:56 PM from Depot Street pharmacy, less than a mile from the Sackett River stop.<br />- The medical examiner recorded a single blow to the posterior skull and documented the wound angle that later proved significant.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1185</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Steaming Cup, the Wool Blazer, and Eight Missing Minutes</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-steaming-cup-the-wool-blazer-and-eight-missing-minutes--73131591</link><description><![CDATA[The Steaming Cup, the Wool Blazer, and Eight Missing Minutes<br /><br />Cold evidence met warm coffee: a county ID badge submerged in a steaming cup on a porch railing, lanyard looped twice with not one drop spilled, and a wool blazer with a petroleum smear the size of a thumbprint. Which of these details proves deliberate staging, and which is an overlooked accident of physics?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline, the physical evidence, and the contradictions that shaped the trial of Marilyn Miller - from the open back door and an eight-minute gap to the blazer cuff tested positive for NovaSeal. Could a county vehicle maintenance entry and a forensic match overturn the prosecution's theory?<br /><br />Person: Alice Poole<br />Date: December 9, 2014<br />Person: Marilyn Miller<br />Location: 4 Caldecott Lane<br />Product: NovaSeal<br /><br />- Alice Poole badged in at the county building at 7:03 AM on December 9, 2014.<br />- Poole sent a text at 7:52 AM reading "Running a home visit. Back before noon." - her last known communication.<br />- Marilyn Miller badged in at Hessler Freight at 8:17 AM the same morning, leaving at most an eight-minute window unaccounted for.<br />- The wool blazer in the hall closet two feet from Poole's body had a petroleum smear on the left cuff that Dr. Ann Becker matched to NovaSeal.<br />- The county fleet garage log shows a Chevy Impala serviced on December 8 for a gear-housing seepage using NovaSeal.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131591</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131591/0165.mp3" length="16578202" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Steaming Cup, the Wool Blazer, and Eight Missing Minutes&#13;
&#13;
Cold evidence met warm coffee: a county ID badge submerged in a steaming cup on a porch railing, lanyard looped twice with not one drop spilled, and a wool blazer with a petroleum smear...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Steaming Cup, the Wool Blazer, and Eight Missing Minutes<br /><br />Cold evidence met warm coffee: a county ID badge submerged in a steaming cup on a porch railing, lanyard looped twice with not one drop spilled, and a wool blazer with a petroleum smear the size of a thumbprint. Which of these details proves deliberate staging, and which is an overlooked accident of physics?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline, the physical evidence, and the contradictions that shaped the trial of Marilyn Miller - from the open back door and an eight-minute gap to the blazer cuff tested positive for NovaSeal. Could a county vehicle maintenance entry and a forensic match overturn the prosecution's theory?<br /><br />Person: Alice Poole<br />Date: December 9, 2014<br />Person: Marilyn Miller<br />Location: 4 Caldecott Lane<br />Product: NovaSeal<br /><br />- Alice Poole badged in at the county building at 7:03 AM on December 9, 2014.<br />- Poole sent a text at 7:52 AM reading "Running a home visit. Back before noon." - her last known communication.<br />- Marilyn Miller badged in at Hessler Freight at 8:17 AM the same morning, leaving at most an eight-minute window unaccounted for.<br />- The wool blazer in the hall closet two feet from Poole's body had a petroleum smear on the left cuff that Dr. Ann Becker matched to NovaSeal.<br />- The county fleet garage log shows a Chevy Impala serviced on December 8 for a gear-housing seepage using NovaSeal.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1037</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Denied by a Clause Signed After the Flame: The Ardmore Scam</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/denied-by-a-clause-signed-after-the-flame-the-ardmore-scam--73131589</link><description><![CDATA[Denied by a Clause Signed After the Flame: The Ardmore Scam<br /><br />Fear that a single line in fine print can erase years of work: eleven days after the fire two goldfish were alive in the ruins while an exclusion added to Rhonda Wilson’s policy three days after the blaze was used to deny her claim - how did that timing happen, and who manufactured the paper trail? Listen to learn how an amendment dated October 27th, approval on September 22nd, and an invoice dated October 21st collide in a claim denial that hinges on three critical days.<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the sequence of events from the fire on October 24th to the denial six weeks later, detailing the policy history, the fire marshal’s observations, and the documents that came to light; what does the presence of fresh tool marks, tripped breakers, and a disputed contractor invoice imply about what really occurred?<br /><br />Person: Rhonda Wilson<br />Date: Fire October 24<br />Policy Coverage: $412,000<br />Amendment Effective Date: October 27<br />Fire Marshal: Dennis Hale<br /><br />- Two goldfish remained alive in the ruins eleven days after the fire, the aquarium filter humming on battery power.<br />- Rhonda had insured the shop with Hartfield Mutual for eleven years with no prior claims and a coverage limit of $412,000.<br />- The fire started in the rear utility room on October 24; Rhonda filed a claim on October 25 and was denied six weeks later.<br />- The denial cited an exclusion effective October 27 for uninspected electrical systems; the amendment was approved September 22 and drafted September 9.<br />- An invoice dated October 21 named technician Vernon Wells and a real but suspended contractor license number; Inland Mechanical had no record of the job or employee.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131589</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:59 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131589/0164.mp3" length="18922535" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Denied by a Clause Signed After the Flame: The Ardmore Scam&#13;
&#13;
Fear that a single line in fine print can erase years of work: eleven days after the fire two goldfish were alive in the ruins while an exclusion added to Rhonda Wilson’s policy three days...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Denied by a Clause Signed After the Flame: The Ardmore Scam<br /><br />Fear that a single line in fine print can erase years of work: eleven days after the fire two goldfish were alive in the ruins while an exclusion added to Rhonda Wilson’s policy three days after the blaze was used to deny her claim - how did that timing happen, and who manufactured the paper trail? Listen to learn how an amendment dated October 27th, approval on September 22nd, and an invoice dated October 21st collide in a claim denial that hinges on three critical days.<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the sequence of events from the fire on October 24th to the denial six weeks later, detailing the policy history, the fire marshal’s observations, and the documents that came to light; what does the presence of fresh tool marks, tripped breakers, and a disputed contractor invoice imply about what really occurred?<br /><br />Person: Rhonda Wilson<br />Date: Fire October 24<br />Policy Coverage: $412,000<br />Amendment Effective Date: October 27<br />Fire Marshal: Dennis Hale<br /><br />- Two goldfish remained alive in the ruins eleven days after the fire, the aquarium filter humming on battery power.<br />- Rhonda had insured the shop with Hartfield Mutual for eleven years with no prior claims and a coverage limit of $412,000.<br />- The fire started in the rear utility room on October 24; Rhonda filed a claim on October 25 and was denied six weeks later.<br />- The denial cited an exclusion effective October 27 for uninspected electrical systems; the amendment was approved September 22 and drafted September 9.<br />- An invoice dated October 21 named technician Vernon Wells and a real but suspended contractor license number; Inland Mechanical had no record of the job or employee.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1183</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Key That Almost Sent An Innocent Woman To Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-key-that-almost-sent-an-innocent-woman-to-prison--73131588</link><description><![CDATA[The Key That Almost Sent An Innocent Woman To Prison<br /><br />A brass key on a green plastic keyring found in a dead woman's right hand nearly sent a 23-year-old with a documented prescription for sodium oxybate to prison for murder. How did a single piece of planted physical evidence override time-stamped alibis, documented workplace logs, and an attorney's discovery of an uncovered service corridor?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the sequence of events from discovery to arrest and the overlooked forensic detail that changed everything as the defense investigated the scene and evidence. What exact laboratory test was omitted, and how did a walk around a building at dusk upend the prosecution's narrative?<br /><br />Person: Mara Hollis<br />Age: 29<br />Event: Found dead in scrub pine 30 feet from Sycamore Loop trail<br />Cause: GBL poisoning consistent with sodium oxybate metabolites<br />Person: Emily Gardner<br /><br />- A brass door key on a green plastic keyring was found in Mara Hollis's right hand at 6:40 AM on a Tuesday in October.<br />- Mara Hollis died 18 to 24 hours before 6:40 AM on Tuesday and was found by a passerby at 6:61? AM (deputies arrived at 6:58 AM).<br />- Emily Gardner, age 23, lived in unit 14 at Calloway Heights, 16 miles from the body location, and had a long-standing prescription for sodium oxybate since age 17.<br />- Emily reported her keys stolen nine days before Mara Hollis's body was found after leaving her car unlocked in the Calloway Heights lot.<br />- Emily was arrested and charged with first-degree murder within 72 hours of Mara Hollis's discovery despite multiple coworkers, a sign-in log, and corroborated timestamps placing her at work the Monday Mara died.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131588</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:54 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131588/0163.mp3" length="20208177" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Key That Almost Sent An Innocent Woman To Prison&#13;
&#13;
A brass key on a green plastic keyring found in a dead woman's right hand nearly sent a 23-year-old with a documented prescription for sodium oxybate to prison for murder. How did a single piece...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Key That Almost Sent An Innocent Woman To Prison<br /><br />A brass key on a green plastic keyring found in a dead woman's right hand nearly sent a 23-year-old with a documented prescription for sodium oxybate to prison for murder. How did a single piece of planted physical evidence override time-stamped alibis, documented workplace logs, and an attorney's discovery of an uncovered service corridor?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the sequence of events from discovery to arrest and the overlooked forensic detail that changed everything as the defense investigated the scene and evidence. What exact laboratory test was omitted, and how did a walk around a building at dusk upend the prosecution's narrative?<br /><br />Person: Mara Hollis<br />Age: 29<br />Event: Found dead in scrub pine 30 feet from Sycamore Loop trail<br />Cause: GBL poisoning consistent with sodium oxybate metabolites<br />Person: Emily Gardner<br /><br />- A brass door key on a green plastic keyring was found in Mara Hollis's right hand at 6:40 AM on a Tuesday in October.<br />- Mara Hollis died 18 to 24 hours before 6:40 AM on Tuesday and was found by a passerby at 6:61? AM (deputies arrived at 6:58 AM).<br />- Emily Gardner, age 23, lived in unit 14 at Calloway Heights, 16 miles from the body location, and had a long-standing prescription for sodium oxybate since age 17.<br />- Emily reported her keys stolen nine days before Mara Hollis's body was found after leaving her car unlocked in the Calloway Heights lot.<br />- Emily was arrested and charged with first-degree murder within 72 hours of Mara Hollis's discovery despite multiple coworkers, a sign-in log, and corroborated timestamps placing her at work the Monday Mara died.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1263</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The River's Orange Stake That Unraveled Four Years of Fraud</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-river-s-orange-stake-that-unraveled-four-years-of-fraud--73131587</link><description><![CDATA[The River's Orange Stake That Unraveled Four Years of Fraud<br /><br />The sight of an orange-capped survey stake standing upright in six inches of Merrold River water started a chain that exposed four years of altered maps and small, unreadable scale notations. A single photograph taken on September 4, 2011 traveled from a fisherman’s phone to a county assessor and then to a forensic surveyor - but why did a routine drainage survey filed at reduced size hide a crucial line of text that would decide a trial?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the path of that photograph and the paperwork it revealed, from Jean Carter’s trotline morning find to the county offices where the filed survey’s scale bar failed to match aerial imagery, to the forensic surveyor who traced the pattern across multiple parcels. How did one licensed surveyor’s repeated use of illegible scale notations on reduced-size maps go unnoticed for years, and who stood to gain?<br /><br />Person: Jean Carter<br />Date: September 4, 2011<br />Location: Merrold River, eastern bank<br />Person: George Padgett<br />Case: Four surveys filed between 2007 and 2010 with reduced-size maps<br /><br />- An orange plastic-capped survey stake was found standing upright in six inches of Merrold River water on the morning of September 4, 2011.<br />- Jean Carter photographed the stake and sent the image to county assessor Bernard Okafor within days.<br />- The filed survey for the 41-acre Haas tract listed a scale of one inch equals 200 feet that did not match aerial imagery.<br />- George Padgett had filed surveys across three counties and completed a drainage survey for the Haas family in 2004 and a resale survey in 2009.<br />- Three other parcels with prior Padgett survey work were filed between 2007 and 2010 with scale notations present but illegible at the reduced size.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131587</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:49 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131587/0162.mp3" length="18656295" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The River's Orange Stake That Unraveled Four Years of Fraud&#13;
&#13;
The sight of an orange-capped survey stake standing upright in six inches of Merrold River water started a chain that exposed four years of altered maps and small, unreadable scale...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The River's Orange Stake That Unraveled Four Years of Fraud<br /><br />The sight of an orange-capped survey stake standing upright in six inches of Merrold River water started a chain that exposed four years of altered maps and small, unreadable scale notations. A single photograph taken on September 4, 2011 traveled from a fisherman’s phone to a county assessor and then to a forensic surveyor - but why did a routine drainage survey filed at reduced size hide a crucial line of text that would decide a trial?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the path of that photograph and the paperwork it revealed, from Jean Carter’s trotline morning find to the county offices where the filed survey’s scale bar failed to match aerial imagery, to the forensic surveyor who traced the pattern across multiple parcels. How did one licensed surveyor’s repeated use of illegible scale notations on reduced-size maps go unnoticed for years, and who stood to gain?<br /><br />Person: Jean Carter<br />Date: September 4, 2011<br />Location: Merrold River, eastern bank<br />Person: George Padgett<br />Case: Four surveys filed between 2007 and 2010 with reduced-size maps<br /><br />- An orange plastic-capped survey stake was found standing upright in six inches of Merrold River water on the morning of September 4, 2011.<br />- Jean Carter photographed the stake and sent the image to county assessor Bernard Okafor within days.<br />- The filed survey for the 41-acre Haas tract listed a scale of one inch equals 200 feet that did not match aerial imagery.<br />- George Padgett had filed surveys across three counties and completed a drainage survey for the Haas family in 2004 and a resale survey in 2009.<br />- Three other parcels with prior Padgett survey work were filed between 2007 and 2010 with scale notations present but illegible at the reduced size.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1166</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Locked Evidence, Open Secret: The Typewriter That Ransomed a Town</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/locked-evidence-open-secret-the-typewriter-that-ransomed-a-town--73131586</link><description><![CDATA[Locked Evidence, Open Secret: The Typewriter That Ransomed a Town<br /><br />A typewriter locked inside a sheriff's evidence room for eleven years was used to type a ransom note that demanded $50,000 and gave a 72-hour deadline - how could a machine catalogued as untouched be used to threaten a 62-year-old woman's family, and who actually accessed it? The note was typed on an IBM Selectric Prestige Elite with two microscopic defects that matched the ransom letter; what happened between the lock and the typing is the central mystery.<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from the Wednesday routines of April Dixon to the August 9, 2013 kidnapping plot, the recovered blue duffel, and the forensic findings that focused the trial CR-2014-0081 on a single damaged typewriter. How did investigators move from a grain storage barn and a panel van to microscopic wear on two letters?<br /><br />Person: April Dixon<br />Person: Marcus Tilford<br />Person: Ross Lewis<br />Date: August 9, 2013<br />Case: CR-2014-0081<br /><br />- The ransom demanded $50,000 and specified a 72-hour deadline delivered in a blue canvas duffel.<br />- Investigators recovered $47,000 in banded twenties in the duffel alongside a prepaid burner phone.<br />- The ransom note was bagged on August 14, 2013 and sent to the state forensic document laboratory on August 16, 2013.<br />- Forensic examiner Patricia Colm identified two microscopic defects: erosion on the capital T serif and ink pooling in the lowercase e.<br />- The jury returned a verdict after deliberating in May 2014 based largely on those two letter flaws.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131586</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:45 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131586/0161.mp3" length="18504576" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Locked Evidence, Open Secret: The Typewriter That Ransomed a Town&#13;
&#13;
A typewriter locked inside a sheriff's evidence room for eleven years was used to type a ransom note that demanded $50,000 and gave a 72-hour deadline - how could a machine...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Locked Evidence, Open Secret: The Typewriter That Ransomed a Town<br /><br />A typewriter locked inside a sheriff's evidence room for eleven years was used to type a ransom note that demanded $50,000 and gave a 72-hour deadline - how could a machine catalogued as untouched be used to threaten a 62-year-old woman's family, and who actually accessed it? The note was typed on an IBM Selectric Prestige Elite with two microscopic defects that matched the ransom letter; what happened between the lock and the typing is the central mystery.<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from the Wednesday routines of April Dixon to the August 9, 2013 kidnapping plot, the recovered blue duffel, and the forensic findings that focused the trial CR-2014-0081 on a single damaged typewriter. How did investigators move from a grain storage barn and a panel van to microscopic wear on two letters?<br /><br />Person: April Dixon<br />Person: Marcus Tilford<br />Person: Ross Lewis<br />Date: August 9, 2013<br />Case: CR-2014-0081<br /><br />- The ransom demanded $50,000 and specified a 72-hour deadline delivered in a blue canvas duffel.<br />- Investigators recovered $47,000 in banded twenties in the duffel alongside a prepaid burner phone.<br />- The ransom note was bagged on August 14, 2013 and sent to the state forensic document laboratory on August 16, 2013.<br />- Forensic examiner Patricia Colm identified two microscopic defects: erosion on the capital T serif and ink pooling in the lowercase e.<br />- The jury returned a verdict after deliberating in May 2014 based largely on those two letter flaws.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1157</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Watch That Lied: How a Timepiece Framed an Innocent Woman</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-watch-that-lied-how-a-timepiece-framed-an-innocent-woman--73131585</link><description><![CDATA[The Watch That Lied: How a Timepiece Framed an Innocent Woman<br /><br />A single wristwatch, found nine feet underground with its face frozen at 11:47 and its crystal unscratched, became the prosecution’s linchpin in a house fire case that ended with a conviction and an eight-year sentence. What the watch actually proved - and how a scientific paper published four years later forced a courtroom to reconsider - raises the question: how did an intact watch survive a house fire and become the evidence that convicted Kimberly Harrison?<br /><br />In this episode, we present the sequence of events from the night of the fire through the discovery of the watch and the trial that followed, outlining the physical evidence, investigative timeline, and the later scientific development that challenged the original conclusions. How did ordinary investigative assumptions about fire behavior and a stopped watch steer an entire case?<br /><br />Person: Kimberly Harrison<br />Date: June 28, 2014 (fire)<br />Location: Covell Road, Drayton Township<br />Event: Watch found in septic distribution box baffle on July 9, 2014<br />Status: Convicted and sentenced to eight years<br /><br />- The watch was photographed at 9:18 AM on July 9, 2014, by septic contractor Russell Nelson.<br />- Deputy Aaron Pruitt logged the watch into evidence at 9:58 AM on July 9, 2014.<br />- The watch face read 11:47, matching the upper boundary of the fire window determined by the deputy fire marshal.<br />- Deputy Fire Marshal Thomas Greer filed his arson report on July 2, 2014, citing pour patterns, alligatoring, and V-shaped char marks.<br />- Kimberly Harrison was 24 years old in summer 2014 and had been arrested on June 29, 2014, less than eight hours after watching her house burn.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131585</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131585/0160.mp3" length="20854342" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Watch That Lied: How a Timepiece Framed an Innocent Woman&#13;
&#13;
A single wristwatch, found nine feet underground with its face frozen at 11:47 and its crystal unscratched, became the prosecution’s linchpin in a house fire case that ended with a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Watch That Lied: How a Timepiece Framed an Innocent Woman<br /><br />A single wristwatch, found nine feet underground with its face frozen at 11:47 and its crystal unscratched, became the prosecution’s linchpin in a house fire case that ended with a conviction and an eight-year sentence. What the watch actually proved - and how a scientific paper published four years later forced a courtroom to reconsider - raises the question: how did an intact watch survive a house fire and become the evidence that convicted Kimberly Harrison?<br /><br />In this episode, we present the sequence of events from the night of the fire through the discovery of the watch and the trial that followed, outlining the physical evidence, investigative timeline, and the later scientific development that challenged the original conclusions. How did ordinary investigative assumptions about fire behavior and a stopped watch steer an entire case?<br /><br />Person: Kimberly Harrison<br />Date: June 28, 2014 (fire)<br />Location: Covell Road, Drayton Township<br />Event: Watch found in septic distribution box baffle on July 9, 2014<br />Status: Convicted and sentenced to eight years<br /><br />- The watch was photographed at 9:18 AM on July 9, 2014, by septic contractor Russell Nelson.<br />- Deputy Aaron Pruitt logged the watch into evidence at 9:58 AM on July 9, 2014.<br />- The watch face read 11:47, matching the upper boundary of the fire window determined by the deputy fire marshal.<br />- Deputy Fire Marshal Thomas Greer filed his arson report on July 2, 2014, citing pour patterns, alligatoring, and V-shaped char marks.<br />- Kimberly Harrison was 24 years old in summer 2014 and had been arrested on June 29, 2014, less than eight hours after watching her house burn.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1304</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Locked Gate, the Missing Shoe, and the Wrong Verdict</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-locked-gate-the-missing-shoe-and-the-wrong-verdict--73131584</link><description><![CDATA[The Locked Gate, the Missing Shoe, and the Wrong Verdict<br /><br />Fear that a single overlooked detail can put the wrong person behind bars - a tan canvas shoe balanced inside a locked fence, a boot print in garden soil, and a forensic claim that would later be contested. Who had access to the gate combination, whose shoe was that, and what single piece of testimony almost sent a man to prison?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from James Jensen's discovery at 7:07 AM on June 14, 2011 to the Harwick County deputies' entry at 9:50 AM, and we trace how a single forensic error shaped Docket CR-4471-J; can the evidence be reconciled with the people who had access to the property?<br /><br />Case: Docket CR-4471-J<br />Date: June 14, 2011<br />Location: 4418 Dunmore Road<br />Person: Melissa Weber<br />Status: Deceased<br /><br />- At 7:07 AM on June 14, 2011, birdwatcher James Jensen found a tan canvas slip-on shoe inside a locked fence on a concrete culvert lip.<br />- Harwick County deputies opened the combination-locked gate and entered the property at 9:50 AM the same morning and found Melissa Weber in her back garden.<br />- Melissa Weber was 47 years old and had lived at 4418 Dunmore Road for 11 years, volunteering every Saturday at the Harwick Food Shelf for four hours.<br />- Steven Clark, who moved to 4402 Dunmore Road in February 2011, knew the gate combination that only someone inside the property could use and had left a north-side basement window unlatched since November 2010.<br />- Roy Tatum’s cell phone placed him on Dunmore Road at 10:40 PM on June 13, 2011, within the medical examiner’s estimated time of death between 9:00 PM and midnight.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131584</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:36 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131584/0159.mp3" length="17899371" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Locked Gate, the Missing Shoe, and the Wrong Verdict&#13;
&#13;
Fear that a single overlooked detail can put the wrong person behind bars - a tan canvas shoe balanced inside a locked fence, a boot print in garden soil, and a forensic claim that would...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Locked Gate, the Missing Shoe, and the Wrong Verdict<br /><br />Fear that a single overlooked detail can put the wrong person behind bars - a tan canvas shoe balanced inside a locked fence, a boot print in garden soil, and a forensic claim that would later be contested. Who had access to the gate combination, whose shoe was that, and what single piece of testimony almost sent a man to prison?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from James Jensen's discovery at 7:07 AM on June 14, 2011 to the Harwick County deputies' entry at 9:50 AM, and we trace how a single forensic error shaped Docket CR-4471-J; can the evidence be reconciled with the people who had access to the property?<br /><br />Case: Docket CR-4471-J<br />Date: June 14, 2011<br />Location: 4418 Dunmore Road<br />Person: Melissa Weber<br />Status: Deceased<br /><br />- At 7:07 AM on June 14, 2011, birdwatcher James Jensen found a tan canvas slip-on shoe inside a locked fence on a concrete culvert lip.<br />- Harwick County deputies opened the combination-locked gate and entered the property at 9:50 AM the same morning and found Melissa Weber in her back garden.<br />- Melissa Weber was 47 years old and had lived at 4418 Dunmore Road for 11 years, volunteering every Saturday at the Harwick Food Shelf for four hours.<br />- Steven Clark, who moved to 4402 Dunmore Road in February 2011, knew the gate combination that only someone inside the property could use and had left a north-side basement window unlatched since November 2010.<br />- Roy Tatum’s cell phone placed him on Dunmore Road at 10:40 PM on June 13, 2011, within the medical examiner’s estimated time of death between 9:00 PM and midnight.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1119</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The False-Positive That Almost Ruined an Innocent Life</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-false-positive-that-almost-ruined-an-innocent-life--73131582</link><description><![CDATA[The False-Positive That Almost Ruined an Innocent Life<br /><br />A recalled chemical test kit, lot number 7741-C, produced a false positive that led to a felony arrest and a prosecution built almost entirely on a single test result - but the kit's manufacturer had warned police eleven months earlier. How did a signed recall letter sit unread while the kit stayed in rotation, and what happened next to the man who was found unconscious with an inflated glove on the dashboard?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the sequence of events from the morning Kevin O'Connor was found unconscious through the arrest and the overlooked recall that mattered most; the narrative follows the evidence, the people at the scene, and the paper trail that ultimately became central to the defense. Can a single lot number and one piece of filed paper change the course of a life?<br /><br />Person: Kevin O'Connor<br />Date: May 7, 2009<br />Location: Dunmore<br />Case: felony possession based on field test<br />Person: Ryan Peterson<br /><br />- Kevin O'Connor was 29 years old in the spring of 2009 and worked as a shift supervisor at Dunmore Fabricating.<br />- At 6:30 AM on May 7, 2009, David Vogel found Kevin unconscious in a car that did not belong to him.<br />- The field test kit used at the scene was a Nark II colorimetric test from lot number 7741-C.<br />- The manufacturer had sent a recall warning to every law enforcement procurement office in the state eleven months before that morning.<br />- Patrolman Carl Dettmer logged the positive color change for methamphetamine at 6:42 AM on May 7, 2009, leading to Kevin's felony arrest with a three-year mandatory minimum.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131582</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131582/0158.mp3" length="19786874" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The False-Positive That Almost Ruined an Innocent Life&#13;
&#13;
A recalled chemical test kit, lot number 7741-C, produced a false positive that led to a felony arrest and a prosecution built almost entirely on a single test result - but the kit's...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The False-Positive That Almost Ruined an Innocent Life<br /><br />A recalled chemical test kit, lot number 7741-C, produced a false positive that led to a felony arrest and a prosecution built almost entirely on a single test result - but the kit's manufacturer had warned police eleven months earlier. How did a signed recall letter sit unread while the kit stayed in rotation, and what happened next to the man who was found unconscious with an inflated glove on the dashboard?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the sequence of events from the morning Kevin O'Connor was found unconscious through the arrest and the overlooked recall that mattered most; the narrative follows the evidence, the people at the scene, and the paper trail that ultimately became central to the defense. Can a single lot number and one piece of filed paper change the course of a life?<br /><br />Person: Kevin O'Connor<br />Date: May 7, 2009<br />Location: Dunmore<br />Case: felony possession based on field test<br />Person: Ryan Peterson<br /><br />- Kevin O'Connor was 29 years old in the spring of 2009 and worked as a shift supervisor at Dunmore Fabricating.<br />- At 6:30 AM on May 7, 2009, David Vogel found Kevin unconscious in a car that did not belong to him.<br />- The field test kit used at the scene was a Nark II colorimetric test from lot number 7741-C.<br />- The manufacturer had sent a recall warning to every law enforcement procurement office in the state eleven months before that morning.<br />- Patrolman Carl Dettmer logged the positive color change for methamphetamine at 6:42 AM on May 7, 2009, leading to Kevin's felony arrest with a three-year mandatory minimum.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1237</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Wet Sock That Forced a Killer's Confession</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-wet-sock-that-forced-a-killer-s-confession--73131581</link><description><![CDATA[The Wet Sock That Forced a Killer's Confession<br /><br />A damp size-seven sneaker found on frozen ground in a semi-arid county, eleven inches of annual rainfall, and a water bill seven times normal - one impossible wet sock became the break in a case where the victim drowned miles from home. How did a woman drown in a place with no water source for forty miles, and what single piece of evidence ended a trial?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Denise Holt’s April 3 call to the forensic and investigative work that connected Robyn Ashby’s death to a remote parcel and a contractor named Dennis Simpson, asking how routine records and one unexpected anomaly led to a courtroom confession.<br /><br />Person: Robyn Ashby<br />Date: April 3, 2011<br />Location: Farm Road 9, Maben County<br />Person: Dennis Simpson<br />Fact: March water consumption at the Fenn parcel was seven times the average<br /><br />- At 6:42 AM on April 3, 2011, Denise Holt found a blue canvas sneaker, size seven (right foot), with a still-damp sock on frozen ground.<br />- Maben County averages eleven inches of rainfall in a good year and had no water source for forty miles around the scene.<br />- Robyn Ashby, age 44, was found drowned four miles from her home on Tanner Drive; her gray sedan and purse were at the house and her last text was at 9:50 PM the previous night.<br />- Dennis Simpson, age 51, had been in Crestfall about fourteen months, met Robyn at a clinic charity dinner in November, and left the Fenn parcel in mid-April without notice.<br />- March water usage at the Fenn parcel was seven times the average for that billing period despite the property having no plumbing improvements, livestock, or active landscaping.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131581</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131581/0157.mp3" length="18797565" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Wet Sock That Forced a Killer's Confession&#13;
&#13;
A damp size-seven sneaker found on frozen ground in a semi-arid county, eleven inches of annual rainfall, and a water bill seven times normal - one impossible wet sock became the break in a case where...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Wet Sock That Forced a Killer's Confession<br /><br />A damp size-seven sneaker found on frozen ground in a semi-arid county, eleven inches of annual rainfall, and a water bill seven times normal - one impossible wet sock became the break in a case where the victim drowned miles from home. How did a woman drown in a place with no water source for forty miles, and what single piece of evidence ended a trial?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Denise Holt’s April 3 call to the forensic and investigative work that connected Robyn Ashby’s death to a remote parcel and a contractor named Dennis Simpson, asking how routine records and one unexpected anomaly led to a courtroom confession.<br /><br />Person: Robyn Ashby<br />Date: April 3, 2011<br />Location: Farm Road 9, Maben County<br />Person: Dennis Simpson<br />Fact: March water consumption at the Fenn parcel was seven times the average<br /><br />- At 6:42 AM on April 3, 2011, Denise Holt found a blue canvas sneaker, size seven (right foot), with a still-damp sock on frozen ground.<br />- Maben County averages eleven inches of rainfall in a good year and had no water source for forty miles around the scene.<br />- Robyn Ashby, age 44, was found drowned four miles from her home on Tanner Drive; her gray sedan and purse were at the house and her last text was at 9:50 PM the previous night.<br />- Dennis Simpson, age 51, had been in Crestfall about fourteen months, met Robyn at a clinic charity dinner in November, and left the Fenn parcel in mid-April without notice.<br />- March water usage at the Fenn parcel was seven times the average for that billing period despite the property having no plumbing improvements, livestock, or active landscaping.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1175</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Wallet on the Pole That Exonerated an Innocent Man</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-wallet-on-the-pole-that-exonerated-an-innocent-man--73131580</link><description><![CDATA[The Wallet on the Pole That Exonerated an Innocent Man<br /><br />Fear of being wronged and the relief of a last-minute reversal: a lineman found a dead woman's wallet zip-tied twelve feet up on a transformer, sealed in a freezer bag and wrapped in electrical tape - and that single, strange concealment would free a man wrongfully accused and put the real killer behind bars. How did a wallet locked in place high above a parking lot become the hinge on which a murder case turned?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Nadine Burwell's disappearance to the discovery on the pole and the evidence that unraveled an arrest, asking how two acts of deliberate concealment - keys set beside a storm drain and a wallet hidden in the dark - fit together to point investigators toward the truth.<br /><br />Person: Nadine Burwell<br />Date: March 5, 2019<br />Location: Aldene River, 1.2 miles north of Dellwood Apartment complex<br />Time of discovery of wallet: 7:22 a.m. on a Tuesday<br />Detective: Renata Spivey, 12 years on the job<br /><br />- Wallet found zip-tied to a transformer twelve feet above ground, inside a sealed freezer bag and wrapped in black electrical tape.<br />- Wallet contents: brown bifold with initials N.B., driver's license, $43 cash, a debit card and a library card, all in their sleeves.<br />- Nadine Burwell's time of death determined as between 9:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m, on March 5, 2019, by Dr. Felix Okafor.<br />- Nadine's keys were found placed neatly thirty yards from where her body entered the water, beside a storm drain.<br />- Lineman Melvin Quinn photographed the wallet in place and called his dispatcher at 7:22 a.m.; Detective Renata Spivey arrived within forty minutes.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131580</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131580/0156.mp3" length="18397160" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Wallet on the Pole That Exonerated an Innocent Man&#13;
&#13;
Fear of being wronged and the relief of a last-minute reversal: a lineman found a dead woman's wallet zip-tied twelve feet up on a transformer, sealed in a freezer bag and wrapped in electrical...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Wallet on the Pole That Exonerated an Innocent Man<br /><br />Fear of being wronged and the relief of a last-minute reversal: a lineman found a dead woman's wallet zip-tied twelve feet up on a transformer, sealed in a freezer bag and wrapped in electrical tape - and that single, strange concealment would free a man wrongfully accused and put the real killer behind bars. How did a wallet locked in place high above a parking lot become the hinge on which a murder case turned?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Nadine Burwell's disappearance to the discovery on the pole and the evidence that unraveled an arrest, asking how two acts of deliberate concealment - keys set beside a storm drain and a wallet hidden in the dark - fit together to point investigators toward the truth.<br /><br />Person: Nadine Burwell<br />Date: March 5, 2019<br />Location: Aldene River, 1.2 miles north of Dellwood Apartment complex<br />Time of discovery of wallet: 7:22 a.m. on a Tuesday<br />Detective: Renata Spivey, 12 years on the job<br /><br />- Wallet found zip-tied to a transformer twelve feet above ground, inside a sealed freezer bag and wrapped in black electrical tape.<br />- Wallet contents: brown bifold with initials N.B., driver's license, $43 cash, a debit card and a library card, all in their sleeves.<br />- Nadine Burwell's time of death determined as between 9:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m, on March 5, 2019, by Dr. Felix Okafor.<br />- Nadine's keys were found placed neatly thirty yards from where her body entered the water, beside a storm drain.<br />- Lineman Melvin Quinn photographed the wallet in place and called his dispatcher at 7:22 a.m.; Detective Renata Spivey arrived within forty minutes.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1150</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Single Shoe on the Bridge: Wrong Man, Right Shoe, Hidden Pings</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/single-shoe-on-the-bridge-wrong-man-right-shoe-hidden-pings--73131579</link><description><![CDATA[Single Shoe on the Bridge: Wrong Man, Right Shoe, Hidden Pings<br /><br />A single pale blue canvas sneaker, laces tied and standing upright on a footbridge, led to a murder, a wrong suspect and a missing piece of technical evidence - and one certified engineering page changed everything. Who left the shoe, and how did a forty-five-minute maintenance window hidden in carrier records shift the case from one man to another?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the discovery of the shoe at 6:52 a.m. on February 9, 2019, through the initial investigation, the suspect identified by jacket and cell pings, and the private investigator’s discovery in the carrier operations log that reopened the question: were the phone records presented to prosecutors accurate?<br /><br />Person: Angela Marsh<br />Date: February 9, 2019<br />Location: Keswick Reservoir footbridge and eastern bank reeds<br />Person: Terry Bauer<br />Person: Wayne Wright<br /><br />- Angela Marsh was found at 7:43 a.m. fully clothed except for missing left shoe and right shoe standing upright on the bridge.<br />- Terry Bauer called 9-1-1 at 6:52 a.m. after spotting a pale blue canvas sneaker with laces tied in the center of the footbridge.<br />- Security footage showed a person wearing an Ardent Plumbing jacket crossing the Clement Avenue grocery parking lot at 11:09 p.m, on February 8, 2019.<br />- Wayne Wright’s phone had three cell-tower pings to the Keswick Lake Road tower at 11:22 p.m., 11:38 p.m., and 11:49 p.m. the night of February 8-9, 2019.<br />- Private investigator Philip Murphy found a certified engineering record on page 44 showing a forty-five-minute maintenance window for the Route Nine interchange tower that investigators had not initially requested.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131579</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:21 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131579/0155.mp3" length="16900030" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Single Shoe on the Bridge: Wrong Man, Right Shoe, Hidden Pings&#13;
&#13;
A single pale blue canvas sneaker, laces tied and standing upright on a footbridge, led to a murder, a wrong suspect and a missing piece of technical evidence - and one certified...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Single Shoe on the Bridge: Wrong Man, Right Shoe, Hidden Pings<br /><br />A single pale blue canvas sneaker, laces tied and standing upright on a footbridge, led to a murder, a wrong suspect and a missing piece of technical evidence - and one certified engineering page changed everything. Who left the shoe, and how did a forty-five-minute maintenance window hidden in carrier records shift the case from one man to another?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the discovery of the shoe at 6:52 a.m. on February 9, 2019, through the initial investigation, the suspect identified by jacket and cell pings, and the private investigator’s discovery in the carrier operations log that reopened the question: were the phone records presented to prosecutors accurate?<br /><br />Person: Angela Marsh<br />Date: February 9, 2019<br />Location: Keswick Reservoir footbridge and eastern bank reeds<br />Person: Terry Bauer<br />Person: Wayne Wright<br /><br />- Angela Marsh was found at 7:43 a.m. fully clothed except for missing left shoe and right shoe standing upright on the bridge.<br />- Terry Bauer called 9-1-1 at 6:52 a.m. after spotting a pale blue canvas sneaker with laces tied in the center of the footbridge.<br />- Security footage showed a person wearing an Ardent Plumbing jacket crossing the Clement Avenue grocery parking lot at 11:09 p.m, on February 8, 2019.<br />- Wayne Wright’s phone had three cell-tower pings to the Keswick Lake Road tower at 11:22 p.m., 11:38 p.m., and 11:49 p.m. the night of February 8-9, 2019.<br />- Private investigator Philip Murphy found a certified engineering record on page 44 showing a forty-five-minute maintenance window for the Route Nine interchange tower that investigators had not initially requested.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1057</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Dead Notary, Wrong Mailbox: How a Birthday Card Crashed a Will Heist</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/dead-notary-wrong-mailbox-how-a-birthday-card-crashed-a-will-heist--73131578</link><description><![CDATA[Dead Notary, Wrong Mailbox: How a Birthday Card Crashed a Will Heist<br /><br />A single birthday card pulled from a sealed mailbox exposed a will that listed a dead notary and a witness who was paid forty dollars to sign without reading - and the forgery was dated four days after the notary's burial. How did one misplaced card unravel a plan that nearly stole an entire estate?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the forged one-page will, the people named on it, and the small mistake that stopped the theft; why did a pharmacy worker sign a document she never read, and what did a buried notary’s death certificate reveal about the timing?<br /><br />Person: Warren Tillich<br />Date: November 2010<br />Location: Halverson County<br />Person: Donna Bishop<br />Person: Edward Marshall<br /><br />- Warren Tillich died at age 78 of congestive heart failure in late November 2010.<br />- The forged will was dated August 3, 2010, four days after Edward Marshall’s death on July 31, 2010.<br />- Edward Marshall’s death certificate was filed on August 4, 2010.<br />- Patricia Neel, age 31, was offered $40 at the pharmacy to sign a document she was not permitted to read and later appeared as a witness on the will.<br />- Douglas Pratt later stated in 2017 that Donna Bishop conceived the plan after learning she was excluded from Warren’s estate.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131578</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:17 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131578/0154.mp3" length="18751171" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Dead Notary, Wrong Mailbox: How a Birthday Card Crashed a Will Heist&#13;
&#13;
A single birthday card pulled from a sealed mailbox exposed a will that listed a dead notary and a witness who was paid forty dollars to sign without reading - and the forgery was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Dead Notary, Wrong Mailbox: How a Birthday Card Crashed a Will Heist<br /><br />A single birthday card pulled from a sealed mailbox exposed a will that listed a dead notary and a witness who was paid forty dollars to sign without reading - and the forgery was dated four days after the notary's burial. How did one misplaced card unravel a plan that nearly stole an entire estate?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the forged one-page will, the people named on it, and the small mistake that stopped the theft; why did a pharmacy worker sign a document she never read, and what did a buried notary’s death certificate reveal about the timing?<br /><br />Person: Warren Tillich<br />Date: November 2010<br />Location: Halverson County<br />Person: Donna Bishop<br />Person: Edward Marshall<br /><br />- Warren Tillich died at age 78 of congestive heart failure in late November 2010.<br />- The forged will was dated August 3, 2010, four days after Edward Marshall’s death on July 31, 2010.<br />- Edward Marshall’s death certificate was filed on August 4, 2010.<br />- Patricia Neel, age 31, was offered $40 at the pharmacy to sign a document she was not permitted to read and later appeared as a witness on the will.<br />- Douglas Pratt later stated in 2017 that Donna Bishop conceived the plan after learning she was excluded from Warren’s estate.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1172</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Knife That Closed a Case-But Didn't Belong to Her</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-knife-that-closed-a-case-but-didn-t-belong-to-her--73131577</link><description><![CDATA[The Knife That Closed a Case-But Didn't Belong to Her<br /><br />Cold facts demand dread: a bare foot showed through a four-inch gap, the temperature was 17°F, and a single partial fingerprint on a foreign serrated bread knife closed the inquiry in six weeks - but that print later proved almost certainly not hers. How did a case with a locked cat, an open rear door that anyone who knew the latch could use, and six knives still in a confirmed seven-slot block get resolved so quickly, and what was lost when it was?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events as recorded in the original file and the lab report to ask the question that remained open: did investigative haste - and a single lab comparison - hide the truth about Pamela Wagner's death?<br /><br />Person: Pamela Wagner<br />Date: December 8, 2011<br />Location: 4418 Sutter Mill Road, Dunbar Township<br />Event: Death by four stab wounds, upper torso<br />Status: Case closed as undetermined death with lean toward self-infliction within six weeks<br /><br />- Temperature outside at discovery: 17 degrees Fahrenheit<br />- Time of call from Chad White to Pamela: 9:44 p.m., lasting eleven minutes<br />- Time window of Pamela’s death: between 11:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. that night<br />- Knife on floor: 9-inch serrated blade with composite handle, ~18 inches from her right hand<br />- Lab timeline: partial fingerprint lifted Dec 9; lab report identifying print as Pamela on page one and closing case by page seven within seven weeks<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131577</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:13 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131577/0153.mp3" length="20464804" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Knife That Closed a Case-But Didn't Belong to Her&#13;
&#13;
Cold facts demand dread: a bare foot showed through a four-inch gap, the temperature was 17°F, and a single partial fingerprint on a foreign serrated bread knife closed the inquiry in six weeks...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Knife That Closed a Case-But Didn't Belong to Her<br /><br />Cold facts demand dread: a bare foot showed through a four-inch gap, the temperature was 17°F, and a single partial fingerprint on a foreign serrated bread knife closed the inquiry in six weeks - but that print later proved almost certainly not hers. How did a case with a locked cat, an open rear door that anyone who knew the latch could use, and six knives still in a confirmed seven-slot block get resolved so quickly, and what was lost when it was?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events as recorded in the original file and the lab report to ask the question that remained open: did investigative haste - and a single lab comparison - hide the truth about Pamela Wagner's death?<br /><br />Person: Pamela Wagner<br />Date: December 8, 2011<br />Location: 4418 Sutter Mill Road, Dunbar Township<br />Event: Death by four stab wounds, upper torso<br />Status: Case closed as undetermined death with lean toward self-infliction within six weeks<br /><br />- Temperature outside at discovery: 17 degrees Fahrenheit<br />- Time of call from Chad White to Pamela: 9:44 p.m., lasting eleven minutes<br />- Time window of Pamela’s death: between 11:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. that night<br />- Knife on floor: 9-inch serrated blade with composite handle, ~18 inches from her right hand<br />- Lab timeline: partial fingerprint lifted Dec 9; lab report identifying print as Pamela on page one and closing case by page seven within seven weeks<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1280</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Shoe on the Rock: How a Reversed CCTV Convicted a Killer</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-shoe-on-the-rock-how-a-reversed-cctv-convicted-a-killer--73131575</link><description><![CDATA[The Shoe on the Rock: How a Reversed CCTV Convicted a Killer<br /><br />Cold evidence: a single tan leather flat sat upright on a frost-covered rock after four inches of snow, with the snow beneath dry and no footprints around it - and Emily Cox had been dead nearly 24 hours before it was found. Everyone believed a seven-minute traffic camera clip showed the truth until the footage was watched in reverse. How did that single reversed clip reshape the case?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the evidence that prosecutors relied on: the missing morning check-in, the locked Civic with a cold coffee cup, the shoe on Weller Quarry trail, and a blood trace under a truck liner linked to a suspect. Which piece of evidence proved decisive when the courtroom finally saw the clip the right way?<br /><br />Person: Emily Cox<br />Date: November 7, 2011 (estimated time of death)<br />Location: Weller Quarry trail (shoe found); ravine ~11 miles northwest (body found)<br />Person: Jason Myers<br />Event: Arrested November 22, 2011 on charge of first-degree intentional homicide<br /><br />- Shoe description: tan leather flat, size seven, embroidered anchor on the toe, found upright on a rock with dry snow beneath<br />- Time between disappearance and shoe discovery: at least two days (disappeared night of Nov 6/early Nov 7; shoe found Nov 9)<br />- Vehicle evidence: blood trace found under rubber liner in Jason Myers’s truck bed matched Emily Cox<br />- Additional physical link: fibers in truck consistent with Emily’s jacket; blue polyethylene tarp in Myers’s storage had soil matching the ravine sediment<br />- Prior contact: Myers and Cox worked at Belford property March-September 2011 and were seen talking on roughly four occasions<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131575</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131575/0152.mp3" length="18108768" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Shoe on the Rock: How a Reversed CCTV Convicted a Killer&#13;
&#13;
Cold evidence: a single tan leather flat sat upright on a frost-covered rock after four inches of snow, with the snow beneath dry and no footprints around it - and Emily Cox had been dead...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Shoe on the Rock: How a Reversed CCTV Convicted a Killer<br /><br />Cold evidence: a single tan leather flat sat upright on a frost-covered rock after four inches of snow, with the snow beneath dry and no footprints around it - and Emily Cox had been dead nearly 24 hours before it was found. Everyone believed a seven-minute traffic camera clip showed the truth until the footage was watched in reverse. How did that single reversed clip reshape the case?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the evidence that prosecutors relied on: the missing morning check-in, the locked Civic with a cold coffee cup, the shoe on Weller Quarry trail, and a blood trace under a truck liner linked to a suspect. Which piece of evidence proved decisive when the courtroom finally saw the clip the right way?<br /><br />Person: Emily Cox<br />Date: November 7, 2011 (estimated time of death)<br />Location: Weller Quarry trail (shoe found); ravine ~11 miles northwest (body found)<br />Person: Jason Myers<br />Event: Arrested November 22, 2011 on charge of first-degree intentional homicide<br /><br />- Shoe description: tan leather flat, size seven, embroidered anchor on the toe, found upright on a rock with dry snow beneath<br />- Time between disappearance and shoe discovery: at least two days (disappeared night of Nov 6/early Nov 7; shoe found Nov 9)<br />- Vehicle evidence: blood trace found under rubber liner in Jason Myers’s truck bed matched Emily Cox<br />- Additional physical link: fibers in truck consistent with Emily’s jacket; blue polyethylene tarp in Myers’s storage had soil matching the ravine sediment<br />- Prior contact: Myers and Cox worked at Belford property March-September 2011 and were seen talking on roughly four occasions<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1132</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Blue Asparagus Band That Nearly Sent An Innocent Man Away</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-blue-asparagus-band-that-nearly-sent-an-innocent-man-away--73131573</link><description><![CDATA[The Blue Asparagus Band That Nearly Sent An Innocent Man Away<br /><br />A single blue asparagus rubber band found around three fingers turned an ordinary produce receipt into the centerpiece of a murder case and nearly sent a 61-year-old man to prison. How did a commonplace band and one mistaken phrase in an interrogation become the hinge of a trial that ignored evidence standing forty feet away?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from the morning a fishing line hauled up a human hand to the arrest and interview of George O'Connor, and the translation error that shaped the prosecution's case. How did interpreters, access logs, phone pings and a Parson Foods receipt combine to point to one man while exonerating evidence waited untouched?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Leung<br />Age: 44<br />Date found: October 6, 2009<br />Location found: Kessler Slough gravel bar, four miles downstream<br />Person: George O'Connor<br /><br />- The blue asparagus rubber band was still circling three of Sandra Leung's fingers when her body was recovered.<br />- Sandra bought one bunch of asparagus on September 29, 2009 for $1.89 at Parson Foods, according to a grocery receipt.<br />- Sandra had worked eleven years the early shift at Dock Eleven of the Portsmith Metropolitan Produce Terminal and missed her usual Wednesday dinner reported by her sister Agnes on October 2, 2009.<br />- Access logs placed George O'Connor in the cold-storage corridor adjacent to Sandra's locker room on three separate occasions in the ten days before she disappeared.<br />- A Forsythe Street traffic camera recorded O'Connor's white service van at 11:14 a.m. on September 30, 2009 two blocks south of Sandra's building, despite a confirmed job site three blocks north.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131573</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131573/0151.mp3" length="18042731" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Blue Asparagus Band That Nearly Sent An Innocent Man Away&#13;
&#13;
A single blue asparagus rubber band found around three fingers turned an ordinary produce receipt into the centerpiece of a murder case and nearly sent a 61-year-old man to prison. How...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Blue Asparagus Band That Nearly Sent An Innocent Man Away<br /><br />A single blue asparagus rubber band found around three fingers turned an ordinary produce receipt into the centerpiece of a murder case and nearly sent a 61-year-old man to prison. How did a commonplace band and one mistaken phrase in an interrogation become the hinge of a trial that ignored evidence standing forty feet away?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from the morning a fishing line hauled up a human hand to the arrest and interview of George O'Connor, and the translation error that shaped the prosecution's case. How did interpreters, access logs, phone pings and a Parson Foods receipt combine to point to one man while exonerating evidence waited untouched?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Leung<br />Age: 44<br />Date found: October 6, 2009<br />Location found: Kessler Slough gravel bar, four miles downstream<br />Person: George O'Connor<br /><br />- The blue asparagus rubber band was still circling three of Sandra Leung's fingers when her body was recovered.<br />- Sandra bought one bunch of asparagus on September 29, 2009 for $1.89 at Parson Foods, according to a grocery receipt.<br />- Sandra had worked eleven years the early shift at Dock Eleven of the Portsmith Metropolitan Produce Terminal and missed her usual Wednesday dinner reported by her sister Agnes on October 2, 2009.<br />- Access logs placed George O'Connor in the cold-storage corridor adjacent to Sandra's locker room on three separate occasions in the ten days before she disappeared.<br />- A Forsythe Street traffic camera recorded O'Connor's white service van at 11:14 a.m. on September 30, 2009 two blocks south of Sandra's building, despite a confirmed job site three blocks north.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1128</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Shoe That Framed Her: How One Digit Sent Her to Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-shoe-that-framed-her-how-one-digit-sent-her-to-prison--73131570</link><description><![CDATA[The Shoe That Framed Her: How One Digit Sent Her to Prison<br /><br />A single miswritten digit turned one unrelated blood sample into the hinge of a murder case, and an innocent woman spent eleven years behind bars because no one asked where that number truly belonged. How did a handwritten error and a common fiber link lock a prosecution that ignored other alibis and contrary facts?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the sequence of events from the discovery of a pristine black patent leather pump to the forensic entries that carried an incorrect blood sample into Docket CR-9114, and we ask whether a simple procedural check could have changed the outcome.<br /><br />Person: Marla Caine<br />Date: last seen August 4<br />Location: Millhaven Road easement, four miles outside Dellsport<br />Status: body recovered five weeks later; homicide confirmed<br />Case: Docket CR-9114<br /><br />- A single black patent leather pump, size seven, was found upright in red clay with no mud on the heel and no scuff on the toe.<br />- Marla Caine, age 23, was last seen August 4 and her body was recovered five weeks later beneath a collapsed corrugated culvert pipe sixty yards from the shoe.<br />- The blood smear on the interior doorframe of Scott Jones's truck was typed A-positive while Jones was O-negative and Marla Caine was A-positive.<br />- A blood sample from Teresa Griffin’s unrelated traffic accident (typed A-positive) was entered into the murder file after one handwritten digit was transposed on a lab intake form.<br />- Teresa Griffin’s alibi placed her working at Tilden Brothers landscape supply on August 4, corroborated by a stamped timecard and two coworkers.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131570</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:22:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131570/0150.mp3" length="18595691" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Shoe That Framed Her: How One Digit Sent Her to Prison&#13;
&#13;
A single miswritten digit turned one unrelated blood sample into the hinge of a murder case, and an innocent woman spent eleven years behind bars because no one asked where that number...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Shoe That Framed Her: How One Digit Sent Her to Prison<br /><br />A single miswritten digit turned one unrelated blood sample into the hinge of a murder case, and an innocent woman spent eleven years behind bars because no one asked where that number truly belonged. How did a handwritten error and a common fiber link lock a prosecution that ignored other alibis and contrary facts?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the sequence of events from the discovery of a pristine black patent leather pump to the forensic entries that carried an incorrect blood sample into Docket CR-9114, and we ask whether a simple procedural check could have changed the outcome.<br /><br />Person: Marla Caine<br />Date: last seen August 4<br />Location: Millhaven Road easement, four miles outside Dellsport<br />Status: body recovered five weeks later; homicide confirmed<br />Case: Docket CR-9114<br /><br />- A single black patent leather pump, size seven, was found upright in red clay with no mud on the heel and no scuff on the toe.<br />- Marla Caine, age 23, was last seen August 4 and her body was recovered five weeks later beneath a collapsed corrugated culvert pipe sixty yards from the shoe.<br />- The blood smear on the interior doorframe of Scott Jones's truck was typed A-positive while Jones was O-negative and Marla Caine was A-positive.<br />- A blood sample from Teresa Griffin’s unrelated traffic accident (typed A-positive) was entered into the murder file after one handwritten digit was transposed on a lab intake form.<br />- Teresa Griffin’s alibi placed her working at Tilden Brothers landscape supply on August 4, corroborated by a stamped timecard and two coworkers.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1163</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sneaker in the Septic: How One Memo Freed the Wrongly Accused</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sneaker-in-the-septic-how-one-memo-freed-the-wrongly-accused--73131569</link><description><![CDATA[The Sneaker in the Septic: How One Memo Freed the Wrongly Accused<br /><br />A dry, tied white leather sneaker was found at the bottom of a sealed septic tank on August 9, 2019 - a shoe that should not have been able to enter the tank without human placement. That single shoe helped convict a woman who spent fifty-eight days in jail; what finally turned the case came from a two-page memo written by a paralegal no one asked for. Who wrote that memo, and how did it undo weeks of investigative certainty?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the sequence of events from the discovery of the sneaker to the arrest of a neighbor, the assumptions that steered the investigation, and the overlooked document that corrected the course of the case. How did routine rhythms of a rural county and one piece of evidence bend an inquiry until an unexpected memo straightened it?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Pruitt<br />Date: July 25, 2019<br />Location: Tanner Creek path and Callum County properties<br />Case: CR-2019-1142<br />Status: Fifty-eight days in county jail for the wrongly accused<br /><br />- A septic technician opened an access hatch on August 9, 2019 and found a women's white leather sneaker with laces tied in a bow.<br />- The sneaker was confirmed as Sandra Pruitt's within forty-eight hours by her roommate.<br />- Detectives named a suspect within eight days of the shoe's discovery and arrested Jennifer Weber on August 17, 2019.<br />- Jennifer Weber was charged with Murder in the First Degree despite no physical evidence linking her to Sandra's death.<br />- A two-page memo written by an unasked paralegal ultimately produced the truth that reversed the course of the investigation.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131569</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131569/0149.mp3" length="19022845" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Sneaker in the Septic: How One Memo Freed the Wrongly Accused&#13;
&#13;
A dry, tied white leather sneaker was found at the bottom of a sealed septic tank on August 9, 2019 - a shoe that should not have been able to enter the tank without human placement....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Sneaker in the Septic: How One Memo Freed the Wrongly Accused<br /><br />A dry, tied white leather sneaker was found at the bottom of a sealed septic tank on August 9, 2019 - a shoe that should not have been able to enter the tank without human placement. That single shoe helped convict a woman who spent fifty-eight days in jail; what finally turned the case came from a two-page memo written by a paralegal no one asked for. Who wrote that memo, and how did it undo weeks of investigative certainty?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the sequence of events from the discovery of the sneaker to the arrest of a neighbor, the assumptions that steered the investigation, and the overlooked document that corrected the course of the case. How did routine rhythms of a rural county and one piece of evidence bend an inquiry until an unexpected memo straightened it?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Pruitt<br />Date: July 25, 2019<br />Location: Tanner Creek path and Callum County properties<br />Case: CR-2019-1142<br />Status: Fifty-eight days in county jail for the wrongly accused<br /><br />- A septic technician opened an access hatch on August 9, 2019 and found a women's white leather sneaker with laces tied in a bow.<br />- The sneaker was confirmed as Sandra Pruitt's within forty-eight hours by her roommate.<br />- Detectives named a suspect within eight days of the shoe's discovery and arrested Jennifer Weber on August 17, 2019.<br />- Jennifer Weber was charged with Murder in the First Degree despite no physical evidence linking her to Sandra's death.<br />- A two-page memo written by an unasked paralegal ultimately produced the truth that reversed the course of the investigation.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1189</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Photograph That Sent Two Women to Trial for Murder</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-photograph-that-sent-two-women-to-trial-for-murder--73131568</link><description><![CDATA[The Photograph That Sent Two Women to Trial for Murder<br /><br />A single pale yellow shoe spotted at 6:17 AM on July 9, 2011 sat upright on a rock at Pell Lake - and seven minutes later a witness called the ranger station. Four days after that, investigators pulled Mara Finch’s body from the western end of the lake, sealed in a nylon bag weighted with stones; the same photograph would later be used to prosecute two different women. Which detail in that image - and in the gaps around it - steered an investigation from missing person to murder trial?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Mara Finch’s disappearance to the evidence that divided a community: the birdwatcher’s photograph, phone records, a blank page in a medical binder, and the forensic window of death. How did a shoe, four phone calls, and one missing log entry become the hinge of two trials and a conviction?<br /><br />Person: Mara Finch<br />Date: July 9, 2011<br />Location: Pell Lake<br />Cause of death: Manual drowning<br />Witness: Diane O'Connor<br /><br />- At 6:17 AM on July 9, 2011 Diane O'Connor saw a pale yellow shoe upright on a rock at Pell Lake and called the ranger station seven minutes later.<br />- Four days after the shoe was reported, investigators recovered Mara Finch’s body sealed in a nylon bag weighted with flat stones from the western end of Pell Lake.<br />- Forensic examiner Dr. Paul Estes placed the window of death between 10:00 PM on July 6 and 2:00 AM on July 7, 2011.<br />- Gloria Gray’s phone records showed four calls to Mara Finch in the 48 hours before July 7, 2011.<br />- Gloria Gray’s blue binder documenting insulin injections for her cat Soot had a blank entry for July 7, 2011 amid two years of meticulous handwritten records.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131568</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131568/0148.mp3" length="20137542" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Photograph That Sent Two Women to Trial for Murder&#13;
&#13;
A single pale yellow shoe spotted at 6:17 AM on July 9, 2011 sat upright on a rock at Pell Lake - and seven minutes later a witness called the ranger station. Four days after that,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Photograph That Sent Two Women to Trial for Murder<br /><br />A single pale yellow shoe spotted at 6:17 AM on July 9, 2011 sat upright on a rock at Pell Lake - and seven minutes later a witness called the ranger station. Four days after that, investigators pulled Mara Finch’s body from the western end of the lake, sealed in a nylon bag weighted with stones; the same photograph would later be used to prosecute two different women. Which detail in that image - and in the gaps around it - steered an investigation from missing person to murder trial?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Mara Finch’s disappearance to the evidence that divided a community: the birdwatcher’s photograph, phone records, a blank page in a medical binder, and the forensic window of death. How did a shoe, four phone calls, and one missing log entry become the hinge of two trials and a conviction?<br /><br />Person: Mara Finch<br />Date: July 9, 2011<br />Location: Pell Lake<br />Cause of death: Manual drowning<br />Witness: Diane O'Connor<br /><br />- At 6:17 AM on July 9, 2011 Diane O'Connor saw a pale yellow shoe upright on a rock at Pell Lake and called the ranger station seven minutes later.<br />- Four days after the shoe was reported, investigators recovered Mara Finch’s body sealed in a nylon bag weighted with flat stones from the western end of Pell Lake.<br />- Forensic examiner Dr. Paul Estes placed the window of death between 10:00 PM on July 6 and 2:00 AM on July 7, 2011.<br />- Gloria Gray’s phone records showed four calls to Mara Finch in the 48 hours before July 7, 2011.<br />- Gloria Gray’s blue binder documenting insulin injections for her cat Soot had a blank entry for July 7, 2011 amid two years of meticulous handwritten records.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1259</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Door Left Open: How One Photo Locked the Wrong Man</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-door-left-open-how-one-photo-locked-the-wrong-man--73131567</link><description><![CDATA[The Door Left Open: How One Photo Locked the Wrong Man<br /><br />A single still from a neighbor’s doorbell camera became the axis of a murder trial, a photograph that a paralegal later found three problems with yet still helped convict an innocent man. How did an open front door, a glass of orange juice, and one dark pickup with a cracked left taillight combine to lock the wrong person away?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the evidence that shaped the case and the questions that linger: why did investigators assume Nadine Cho opened the door, what did that glass of orange juice really mean, and how did a neighbor’s camera image come to dominate nine years of legal consequences?<br /><br />Person: Nadine Cho<br />Date: June 9, 2011 (time of discovery 6:47 AM)<br />Location: Heron Court, Millbrook Heights, Carver, Ohio<br />Event: Neighbor's consumer doorbell camera captured a still image used at trial<br />Person: Gary Romano<br /><br />- At 6:47 AM on June 9, 2011, fourteen-year-old Brian Hunter found the front door standing wide open and called 911.<br />- Detective Paul Tran placed time of death between 11:00 PM on June 8 and 1:00 AM on June 9.<br />- Nadine Cho, age 43, had worked as a dental hygienist for eleven years and lived alone on Heron Court for six years.<br />- A dark pickup with a cracked left taillight was reported parked on Heron Court multiple times in the weeks before the death; Gary Romano drove a dark green Ford F-150 matching that description.<br />- Romano’s March 2011 job for Nadine paid $420; a handwritten note found in his apartment read: "I should call her. Don't be stupid."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131567</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:49 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131567/0147.mp3" length="19546130" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Door Left Open: How One Photo Locked the Wrong Man&#13;
&#13;
A single still from a neighbor’s doorbell camera became the axis of a murder trial, a photograph that a paralegal later found three problems with yet still helped convict an innocent man. How...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Door Left Open: How One Photo Locked the Wrong Man<br /><br />A single still from a neighbor’s doorbell camera became the axis of a murder trial, a photograph that a paralegal later found three problems with yet still helped convict an innocent man. How did an open front door, a glass of orange juice, and one dark pickup with a cracked left taillight combine to lock the wrong person away?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the evidence that shaped the case and the questions that linger: why did investigators assume Nadine Cho opened the door, what did that glass of orange juice really mean, and how did a neighbor’s camera image come to dominate nine years of legal consequences?<br /><br />Person: Nadine Cho<br />Date: June 9, 2011 (time of discovery 6:47 AM)<br />Location: Heron Court, Millbrook Heights, Carver, Ohio<br />Event: Neighbor's consumer doorbell camera captured a still image used at trial<br />Person: Gary Romano<br /><br />- At 6:47 AM on June 9, 2011, fourteen-year-old Brian Hunter found the front door standing wide open and called 911.<br />- Detective Paul Tran placed time of death between 11:00 PM on June 8 and 1:00 AM on June 9.<br />- Nadine Cho, age 43, had worked as a dental hygienist for eleven years and lived alone on Heron Court for six years.<br />- A dark pickup with a cracked left taillight was reported parked on Heron Court multiple times in the weeks before the death; Gary Romano drove a dark green Ford F-150 matching that description.<br />- Romano’s March 2011 job for Nadine paid $420; a handwritten note found in his apartment read: "I should call her. Don't be stupid."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1222</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Glasses on the Locked Road: How Trust Turned Fatal</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-glasses-on-the-locked-road-how-trust-turned-fatal--73131563</link><description><![CDATA[The Glasses on the Locked Road: How Trust Turned Fatal<br /><br />A woman’s reading glasses lay upright on a locked service road-lenses unbroken, tortoiseshell frames clean-eleven days after she vanished, and the road’s padlock had been cut three weeks earlier. Who placed those glasses where only someone who knew the road could find them, and why did investigators first point to the wrong person?<br /><br />In this episode, we outline the timeline of Connie Delaney’s disappearance, the discovery of her glasses and body, and the investigative threads that tied together a contractor, a cut padlock, and an insurance adjuster - asking who used trust and uniform as a weapon.<br /><br />Person: Connie Delaney<br />Date: April 28, 2003 (missing reported)<br />Date: May 9, 2003 (glasses found at 6:14 a.m.)<br />Location: service road along northern edge of county fairgrounds, 40 meters south of drainage canal where body found<br />Person: Melvin Snyder<br /><br />- Connie Delaney was 41 years old and worked as a librarian in Arling.<br />- Janet Coleman found tortoiseshell reading glasses at 6:14 a.m. on May 9, 2003, on a locked service road.<br />- The service road had been closed to the public since November; its original padlock was cut and replaced on April 30, 2003.<br />- Connie’s body was found the afternoon of May 9, 2003, in a drainage canal 40 meters north of where the glasses were found; cause: strangulation.<br />- Melvin Snyder, 51, a contractor from Galen, had visited the Delaney home in January and October 2002 and used a bolt cutter on the service road gate around April 7, 2003, then followed Connie on April 27, 2003.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131563</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131563/0146.mp3" length="20079446" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Glasses on the Locked Road: How Trust Turned Fatal&#13;
&#13;
A woman’s reading glasses lay upright on a locked service road-lenses unbroken, tortoiseshell frames clean-eleven days after she vanished, and the road’s padlock had been cut three weeks...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Glasses on the Locked Road: How Trust Turned Fatal<br /><br />A woman’s reading glasses lay upright on a locked service road-lenses unbroken, tortoiseshell frames clean-eleven days after she vanished, and the road’s padlock had been cut three weeks earlier. Who placed those glasses where only someone who knew the road could find them, and why did investigators first point to the wrong person?<br /><br />In this episode, we outline the timeline of Connie Delaney’s disappearance, the discovery of her glasses and body, and the investigative threads that tied together a contractor, a cut padlock, and an insurance adjuster - asking who used trust and uniform as a weapon.<br /><br />Person: Connie Delaney<br />Date: April 28, 2003 (missing reported)<br />Date: May 9, 2003 (glasses found at 6:14 a.m.)<br />Location: service road along northern edge of county fairgrounds, 40 meters south of drainage canal where body found<br />Person: Melvin Snyder<br /><br />- Connie Delaney was 41 years old and worked as a librarian in Arling.<br />- Janet Coleman found tortoiseshell reading glasses at 6:14 a.m. on May 9, 2003, on a locked service road.<br />- The service road had been closed to the public since November; its original padlock was cut and replaced on April 30, 2003.<br />- Connie’s body was found the afternoon of May 9, 2003, in a drainage canal 40 meters north of where the glasses were found; cause: strangulation.<br />- Melvin Snyder, 51, a contractor from Galen, had visited the Delaney home in January and October 2002 and used a bolt cutter on the service road gate around April 7, 2003, then followed Connie on April 27, 2003.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1255</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Envelope, The Clock, And The Alibi That Broke A Life</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-envelope-the-clock-and-the-alibi-that-broke-a-life--73131561</link><description><![CDATA[The Envelope, The Clock, And The Alibi That Broke A Life<br /><br />Fear and relief collide: a Seiko watch inside a Harwick Savings & Loan envelope with Wendy Duncan’s name sat hidden for seven months, and that overlooked item would become the hinge between a 22-year prison sentence and a shattered alibi. Who failed to read the log book entries, why the second palm print was never analyzed, and could one routine Thursday visit have cleared her?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how evidence, signatures, receipts, staff memory and a missed phone call shaped a murder conviction and a later review - and we ask whether a case built on “likely match” ever met the basic test of reasonable doubt.<br /><br />Person: Wendy Duncan<br />Person: Marcus Frey<br />Date: September 19, 2013<br />Date: February 26, 2014<br />Location: Crestfield Arms<br /><br />- A Seiko watch was found inside a Harwick Savings & Loan envelope after being wedged behind a street meter on April 9, 2014.<br />- Wendy Duncan was convicted on February 26, 2014 and sentenced to twenty-two years for second-degree murder.<br />- The medical examiner placed Marcus Frey’s time of death between 6:00 and 9:00 PM on September 19, 2013.<br />- A log book at Pinegrove recorded Wendy signing in at 6:14 PM and signing out at 8:02 PM on September 19, 2013.<br />- Detective Art Lemmon changed “consistent with Wendy Duncan” in the forensic report to “likely match” in his prosecution summary.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131561</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131561/0145.mp3" length="18166864" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Envelope, The Clock, And The Alibi That Broke A Life&#13;
&#13;
Fear and relief collide: a Seiko watch inside a Harwick Savings &amp; Loan envelope with Wendy Duncan’s name sat hidden for seven months, and that overlooked item would become the hinge between a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Envelope, The Clock, And The Alibi That Broke A Life<br /><br />Fear and relief collide: a Seiko watch inside a Harwick Savings & Loan envelope with Wendy Duncan’s name sat hidden for seven months, and that overlooked item would become the hinge between a 22-year prison sentence and a shattered alibi. Who failed to read the log book entries, why the second palm print was never analyzed, and could one routine Thursday visit have cleared her?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how evidence, signatures, receipts, staff memory and a missed phone call shaped a murder conviction and a later review - and we ask whether a case built on “likely match” ever met the basic test of reasonable doubt.<br /><br />Person: Wendy Duncan<br />Person: Marcus Frey<br />Date: September 19, 2013<br />Date: February 26, 2014<br />Location: Crestfield Arms<br /><br />- A Seiko watch was found inside a Harwick Savings & Loan envelope after being wedged behind a street meter on April 9, 2014.<br />- Wendy Duncan was convicted on February 26, 2014 and sentenced to twenty-two years for second-degree murder.<br />- The medical examiner placed Marcus Frey’s time of death between 6:00 and 9:00 PM on September 19, 2013.<br />- A log book at Pinegrove recorded Wendy signing in at 6:14 PM and signing out at 8:02 PM on September 19, 2013.<br />- Detective Art Lemmon changed “consistent with Wendy Duncan” in the forensic report to “likely match” in his prosecution summary.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1136</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Dry Lunchbox, Warm Note: How a Typed Message Framed a Murder Trial</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/dry-lunchbox-warm-note-how-a-typed-message-framed-a-murder-trial--73131560</link><description><![CDATA[Dry Lunchbox, Warm Note: How a Typed Message Framed a Murder Trial<br /><br />A dry, warm red lunchbox sat on wet asphalt at 6:45 a.m. on March 7, 2011 - inside was a twelve-word typed note that had no fingerprints and no DNA. That lunchbox linked a homicide, a disputed zoning fight, and a storage building with mineral-oil residue; who placed it there, and why, would pivot a murder case from conviction to exoneration.<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the timeline from the morning the lunchbox was found through the contested evidence that followed, and we follow the threads that tied Patricia Osgood to the Belford property dispute - but who really left that note?<br /><br />Person: Patricia Osgood<br />Age: 51<br />Date: March 7, 2011<br />Location: Orchard Bend parking lot<br />Case: Typed note reading "She knew about the Belford property."<br /><br />- Time lunchbox was found: 6:45 a.m.<br />- Note format: typed in twelve-point Courier, twelve words, past tense.<br />- Victim condition: strangled with a ligature, discovered seated upright with seatbelt fastened.<br />- Cell-tower data: placed Thomas Callahan's phone in Orchard Bend area between 1:00 and 4:00 a.m.<br />- Storage evidence: mineral-oil residue linked the lunchbox to Belford's heated storage building visited for three days in November 2009.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131560</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131560/0144.mp3" length="17801568" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Dry Lunchbox, Warm Note: How a Typed Message Framed a Murder Trial&#13;
&#13;
A dry, warm red lunchbox sat on wet asphalt at 6:45 a.m. on March 7, 2011 - inside was a twelve-word typed note that had no fingerprints and no DNA. That lunchbox linked a homicide,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Dry Lunchbox, Warm Note: How a Typed Message Framed a Murder Trial<br /><br />A dry, warm red lunchbox sat on wet asphalt at 6:45 a.m. on March 7, 2011 - inside was a twelve-word typed note that had no fingerprints and no DNA. That lunchbox linked a homicide, a disputed zoning fight, and a storage building with mineral-oil residue; who placed it there, and why, would pivot a murder case from conviction to exoneration.<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the timeline from the morning the lunchbox was found through the contested evidence that followed, and we follow the threads that tied Patricia Osgood to the Belford property dispute - but who really left that note?<br /><br />Person: Patricia Osgood<br />Age: 51<br />Date: March 7, 2011<br />Location: Orchard Bend parking lot<br />Case: Typed note reading "She knew about the Belford property."<br /><br />- Time lunchbox was found: 6:45 a.m.<br />- Note format: typed in twelve-point Courier, twelve words, past tense.<br />- Victim condition: strangled with a ligature, discovered seated upright with seatbelt fastened.<br />- Cell-tower data: placed Thomas Callahan's phone in Orchard Bend area between 1:00 and 4:00 a.m.<br />- Storage evidence: mineral-oil residue linked the lunchbox to Belford's heated storage building visited for three days in November 2009.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1113</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pink Boot That Freed Her - Who Hid It Underneath?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pink-boot-that-freed-her-who-hid-it-underneath--73131559</link><description><![CDATA[The Pink Boot That Freed Her - Who Hid It Underneath?<br /><br />A single size-four pink rain boot, found clean and upright in dirt under a crawl-space hatch, would decide whether a woman spent the rest of her life behind bars. Who slipped that boot beneath unit four while the accused had been locked in custody for eighty-three days?<br /><br />In this episode, we narrate the sequence of events from Lily Ostrander's disappearance to the discovery that changed the case. What did the boot, the fiber analysis, and the cell tower data really prove, and who did the evidence leave out?<br /><br />Person: Tracy Whitley<br />Person: Lily Ostrander<br />Date: October 2013 (Lily vanished)<br />Date: November 19, 2013 (Tracy arrested)<br />Location: Halloran Court, Fenwick Township<br />Event: Boot found February 6, 2014<br /><br />- Lily Ostrander was six years old and wore size-four pink rain boots with a manufacturer's ink stamp.<br />- Tracy Whitley was held in custody for eighty-three days before the boot was discovered.<br />- A fiber analyst used an eleven-point comparison protocol retired in 2009 instead of the then-current twenty-three-point standard.<br />- Tracy's phone pinged a cell tower between 4:17 and 6:44 p.m. on the day Lily vanished, covering both the culvert and the Community Center.<br />- The pink left boot was found upright under the crawl-space hatch of unit four on February 6, 2014, by utility meter reader Kimberly Padgett.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131559</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131559/0143.mp3" length="20120406" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Pink Boot That Freed Her - Who Hid It Underneath?&#13;
&#13;
A single size-four pink rain boot, found clean and upright in dirt under a crawl-space hatch, would decide whether a woman spent the rest of her life behind bars. Who slipped that boot beneath...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Pink Boot That Freed Her - Who Hid It Underneath?<br /><br />A single size-four pink rain boot, found clean and upright in dirt under a crawl-space hatch, would decide whether a woman spent the rest of her life behind bars. Who slipped that boot beneath unit four while the accused had been locked in custody for eighty-three days?<br /><br />In this episode, we narrate the sequence of events from Lily Ostrander's disappearance to the discovery that changed the case. What did the boot, the fiber analysis, and the cell tower data really prove, and who did the evidence leave out?<br /><br />Person: Tracy Whitley<br />Person: Lily Ostrander<br />Date: October 2013 (Lily vanished)<br />Date: November 19, 2013 (Tracy arrested)<br />Location: Halloran Court, Fenwick Township<br />Event: Boot found February 6, 2014<br /><br />- Lily Ostrander was six years old and wore size-four pink rain boots with a manufacturer's ink stamp.<br />- Tracy Whitley was held in custody for eighty-three days before the boot was discovered.<br />- A fiber analyst used an eleven-point comparison protocol retired in 2009 instead of the then-current twenty-three-point standard.<br />- Tracy's phone pinged a cell tower between 4:17 and 6:44 p.m. on the day Lily vanished, covering both the culvert and the Community Center.<br />- The pink left boot was found upright under the crawl-space hatch of unit four on February 6, 2014, by utility meter reader Kimberly Padgett.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1258</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Coat That Framed a Murder: How a Footnote Freed Him</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-coat-that-framed-a-murder-how-a-footnote-freed-him--73131557</link><description><![CDATA[The Coat That Framed a Murder: How a Footnote Freed Him<br /><br />Snowfall stopped at 3:15 a.m., yet the coat was standing upright, buttoned to the collar with no flakes on its shoulders-placed in the dark and containing Sandra Voss’s laminated transit pass. Who put that coat in the culvert before dawn, and how did a single footnote in an exhibit binder change everything?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of discoveries from the coat found at 6:40 a.m. to the evidence that led to a trial, and why a bus schedule buried on page 47 in eight-point type became the unanswered question that would free a man. What was written on that page, and who missed it for nearly four years?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Voss<br />Age: 31<br />Found: January 20<br />Coat discovery time: 6:40 a.m.<br />Exhibit location: page 47, eight-point type<br /><br />- Four inches of snow had fallen overnight and the coat showed no snow accumulation, meaning it was placed after 3:15 a.m.<br />- The coat was found at 6:40 a.m. on January 9 by maintenance worker Frank Riley near Aldermoor Road.<br />- Sandra Voss left work at approximately 6:00 p.m. on January 5 with her laminated monthly transit pass in hand and was reported missing that night.<br />- Sandra’s body was recovered eleven days later, on January 20, from a drainage easement; the medical examiner determined she had been strangled.<br />- Three pieces of lab evidence linked to Jerry Sharp: fibers from the coat matched his truck cab, a partial boot print matched his boot size and tread, and depot logs placed him near Millhaven Street on relevant mornings.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131557</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131557/0142.mp3" length="19186267" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Coat That Framed a Murder: How a Footnote Freed Him&#13;
&#13;
Snowfall stopped at 3:15 a.m., yet the coat was standing upright, buttoned to the collar with no flakes on its shoulders-placed in the dark and containing Sandra Voss’s laminated transit pass....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Coat That Framed a Murder: How a Footnote Freed Him<br /><br />Snowfall stopped at 3:15 a.m., yet the coat was standing upright, buttoned to the collar with no flakes on its shoulders-placed in the dark and containing Sandra Voss’s laminated transit pass. Who put that coat in the culvert before dawn, and how did a single footnote in an exhibit binder change everything?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of discoveries from the coat found at 6:40 a.m. to the evidence that led to a trial, and why a bus schedule buried on page 47 in eight-point type became the unanswered question that would free a man. What was written on that page, and who missed it for nearly four years?<br /><br />Person: Sandra Voss<br />Age: 31<br />Found: January 20<br />Coat discovery time: 6:40 a.m.<br />Exhibit location: page 47, eight-point type<br /><br />- Four inches of snow had fallen overnight and the coat showed no snow accumulation, meaning it was placed after 3:15 a.m.<br />- The coat was found at 6:40 a.m. on January 9 by maintenance worker Frank Riley near Aldermoor Road.<br />- Sandra Voss left work at approximately 6:00 p.m. on January 5 with her laminated monthly transit pass in hand and was reported missing that night.<br />- Sandra’s body was recovered eleven days later, on January 20, from a drainage easement; the medical examiner determined she had been strangled.<br />- Three pieces of lab evidence linked to Jerry Sharp: fibers from the coat matched his truck cab, a partial boot print matched his boot size and tread, and depot logs placed him near Millhaven Street on relevant mornings.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1200</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Library Card That Sent an Innocent Man to Prison</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-library-card-that-sent-an-innocent-man-to-prison--73131550</link><description><![CDATA[The Library Card That Sent an Innocent Man to Prison<br /><br />A single laminated library card, pressed into a murdered woman's palm, carried a number registered to a 61-year-old carpenter - and that card became the hinge for a case that sent an innocent man to prison. What role did a call from a detained informant and one microscopic fiber play in turning a peripheral acquaintance into the prime suspect?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the November 2019 disappearance to the discovery on December 9, 2019, and the December 14th call that redirected investigators toward Kenneth Williams - raising the question of how a card and a jailhouse tip outweighed the absence of physical evidence.<br /><br />Person: Donna Marsh<br />Date: November 26-29, 2019<br />Location: Cade's Bluff trail culvert<br />Person: Kenneth Williams<br />Person: James Vickers<br /><br />- Donna Marsh, age 44, was last seen on November 27, 2019, and reported missing November 28, 2019.<br />- Her body was found December 9, 2019, in a culvert on the Cade's Bluff trail with a blue-stone ring on her finger.<br />- The laminated library card found in her palm was registered to Kenneth Williams, age 61.<br />- James Vickers, age 43, called the sheriff’s office from a detention facility on December 14, 2019, and identified the culvert by a nonpublic detail.<br />- Investigators’ search of Williams’s home on December 11, 2019, produced no fibers, trace evidence, or communications linking him to Marsh.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73131550</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:21:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73131550/0141.mp3" length="17450900" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Library Card That Sent an Innocent Man to Prison&#13;
&#13;
A single laminated library card, pressed into a murdered woman's palm, carried a number registered to a 61-year-old carpenter - and that card became the hinge for a case that sent an innocent man...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Library Card That Sent an Innocent Man to Prison<br /><br />A single laminated library card, pressed into a murdered woman's palm, carried a number registered to a 61-year-old carpenter - and that card became the hinge for a case that sent an innocent man to prison. What role did a call from a detained informant and one microscopic fiber play in turning a peripheral acquaintance into the prime suspect?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the November 2019 disappearance to the discovery on December 9, 2019, and the December 14th call that redirected investigators toward Kenneth Williams - raising the question of how a card and a jailhouse tip outweighed the absence of physical evidence.<br /><br />Person: Donna Marsh<br />Date: November 26-29, 2019<br />Location: Cade's Bluff trail culvert<br />Person: Kenneth Williams<br />Person: James Vickers<br /><br />- Donna Marsh, age 44, was last seen on November 27, 2019, and reported missing November 28, 2019.<br />- Her body was found December 9, 2019, in a culvert on the Cade's Bluff trail with a blue-stone ring on her finger.<br />- The laminated library card found in her palm was registered to Kenneth Williams, age 61.<br />- James Vickers, age 43, called the sheriff’s office from a detention facility on December 14, 2019, and identified the culvert by a nonpublic detail.<br />- Investigators’ search of Williams’s home on December 11, 2019, produced no fibers, trace evidence, or communications linking him to Marsh.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1091</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/6157696ebb642b33ba1055c58bf9b47e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>
