<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Horror Nightmare Stories</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/horror-nightmare-stories--7162812</link><description><![CDATA[You hear a noise in the dark, tell yourself it was nothing, and then it happens again—closer. Horror Nightmare Stories pulls you into unsettling encounters, disturbing nightmares, paranormal events and terrifying moments where the safest explanation suddenly stops making sense.<br /><br /> Each story pushes deeper into ghostly encounters, unexplained presences, psychological horror and creepy experiences that leave one question hanging long after the episode ends. The warning signs are easy to ignore at first—a sound, a shadow, a strange feeling—but some nights only get worse once you start paying attention. When the darkness finally reveals what has been waiting there, will you wish you had never looked?]]></description><atom:link href="https://www.spreaker.com/show/7162812/episodes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language>en</language><category>Science Fiction</category><copyright>© 2026 OBOMEDIA Creators</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 04:24:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:name><itunes:email>creators@obomedia.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>You hear a noise in the dark, tell yourself it was nothing, and then it happens again—closer. Horror Nightmare Stories pulls you into unsettling encounters, disturbing nightmares, paranormal events and terrifying moments where the safest explanation...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[You hear a noise in the dark, tell yourself it was nothing, and then it happens again—closer. Horror Nightmare Stories pulls you into unsettling encounters, disturbing nightmares, paranormal events and terrifying moments where the safest explanation suddenly stops making sense.<br /><br /> Each story pushes deeper into ghostly encounters, unexplained presences, psychological horror and creepy experiences that leave one question hanging long after the episode ends. The warning signs are easy to ignore at first—a sound, a shadow, a strange feeling—but some nights only get worse once you start paying attention. When the darkness finally reveals what has been waiting there, will you wish you had never looked?]]></itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Fiction"><itunes:category text="Science Fiction"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Fiction"><itunes:category text="Drama"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"><itunes:category text="Personal Journals"/></itunes:category><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><podcast:guid>227af9b8-cad4-50d1-8f52-17302584f518</podcast:guid><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><item><title>The Shot at Twenty-Five Centimeters: Who Silenced Yara?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-shot-at-twenty-five-centimeters-who-silenced-yara--72879213</link><description><![CDATA[The Shot at Twenty-Five Centimeters: Who Silenced Yara?<br /><br />A mid‑day gunshot in a small Bahía town, a bullet fired from just 25 centimeters beneath the chin, and a car fleeing at full speed - yet investigators closed the case months later saying it was accidental. Why did three adults vanish down secondary roads for more than 500 kilometers, and how did a weapon bought on the illegal market end up at a scene with several loaded magazines and a nine‑year‑old present?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the morning of July 6, 2023 through the provisional case closure in November 2023, laying out who was in the house, what police found, and why the victim’s family pushed the story into public view. Can the official accident hypothesis survive the physical details and the choices made after the shot?<br /><br />Date: July 6, 2023<br />Location: Guaratinga, Bahía, Brazil<br />Victim: Yara Flor Santos Alves, 14 years old<br />Distance: approximately 25 centimeters between muzzle and entry wound<br />Duration to provisional closure: four months (case closed November 2023)<br /><br />- Yara was 14 years old and had been married for less than two months at the time of the shot.<br />- The bullet entered beneath her chin and lodged in her vertebrae; she arrived at the hospital in critical condition and died shortly after.<br />- Present in the house were Yara, her husband (14), his father, another adult relative, and the husband’s nine‑year‑old brother.<br />- The three adults fled via secondary roads and were located more than 500 kilometers away; the husband was found in Espírito Santo after 20 days.<br />- Investigators found an unregistered pistol and several loaded magazines in the house; the firearm had been acquired through an illegal market months earlier.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879213</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:46 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879213/0700.mp3" length="21968198" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Shot at Twenty-Five Centimeters: Who Silenced Yara?&#13;
&#13;
A mid‑day gunshot in a small Bahía town, a bullet fired from just 25 centimeters beneath the chin, and a car fleeing at full speed - yet investigators closed the case months later saying it...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Shot at Twenty-Five Centimeters: Who Silenced Yara?<br /><br />A mid‑day gunshot in a small Bahía town, a bullet fired from just 25 centimeters beneath the chin, and a car fleeing at full speed - yet investigators closed the case months later saying it was accidental. Why did three adults vanish down secondary roads for more than 500 kilometers, and how did a weapon bought on the illegal market end up at a scene with several loaded magazines and a nine‑year‑old present?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the morning of July 6, 2023 through the provisional case closure in November 2023, laying out who was in the house, what police found, and why the victim’s family pushed the story into public view. Can the official accident hypothesis survive the physical details and the choices made after the shot?<br /><br />Date: July 6, 2023<br />Location: Guaratinga, Bahía, Brazil<br />Victim: Yara Flor Santos Alves, 14 years old<br />Distance: approximately 25 centimeters between muzzle and entry wound<br />Duration to provisional closure: four months (case closed November 2023)<br /><br />- Yara was 14 years old and had been married for less than two months at the time of the shot.<br />- The bullet entered beneath her chin and lodged in her vertebrae; she arrived at the hospital in critical condition and died shortly after.<br />- Present in the house were Yara, her husband (14), his father, another adult relative, and the husband’s nine‑year‑old brother.<br />- The three adults fled via secondary roads and were located more than 500 kilometers away; the husband was found in Espírito Santo after 20 days.<br />- Investigators found an unregistered pistol and several loaded magazines in the house; the firearm had been acquired through an illegal market months earlier.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1373</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Phone in the Pond: Mother Missing, Son Confesses Murder</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-phone-in-the-pond-mother-missing-son-confesses-murder--72879210</link><description><![CDATA[The Phone in the Pond: Mother Missing, Son Confesses Murder<br /><br />Cold evidence sits where you least expect it: a phone that never left the property, a scalded patch of earth fifty feet from the back door, and two conflicting stories that tried to explain a disappearance. What really happened inside that house before Silvia Vilches was found, and why was her phone placed in the pond?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the missing-persons report to the scene investigators uncovered, laying out the physical traces and the inconsistencies in the accounts that kept the case alive. Which detail - the phone, the stains, the drag marks, or the statements from the husband and son - finally cracked the story open?<br /><br />Person: Silvia Vilches<br />Age: 50<br />Date reported missing: October 28, 2025<br />Location where remains were found: scorched earth approximately fifty feet from the back door<br />Status: body recovered<br /><br />- Silvia’s phone registered no movement toward any airport, border, or international travel corridor after the disappearance.<br />- Police entered the home on October 30, 2025, and found carpet, walls, and furniture with dark stains consistent with movement of biological material.<br />- A shop vacuum recovered from the property contained biological material despite attempts to clean the house.<br />- Drag marks led from the house toward the tree line and ended at a scorched patch of ground about fifty meters from the tree line where Silvia’s remains were found.<br />- On October 28, 2025, both husband David Garden and son Gabriel gave police accounts saying Silvia had left voluntarily-accounts that conflicted with each other and with the phone’s location data.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879210</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:43 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879210/0699.mp3" length="23252169" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Phone in the Pond: Mother Missing, Son Confesses Murder&#13;
&#13;
Cold evidence sits where you least expect it: a phone that never left the property, a scalded patch of earth fifty feet from the back door, and two conflicting stories that tried to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Phone in the Pond: Mother Missing, Son Confesses Murder<br /><br />Cold evidence sits where you least expect it: a phone that never left the property, a scalded patch of earth fifty feet from the back door, and two conflicting stories that tried to explain a disappearance. What really happened inside that house before Silvia Vilches was found, and why was her phone placed in the pond?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the missing-persons report to the scene investigators uncovered, laying out the physical traces and the inconsistencies in the accounts that kept the case alive. Which detail - the phone, the stains, the drag marks, or the statements from the husband and son - finally cracked the story open?<br /><br />Person: Silvia Vilches<br />Age: 50<br />Date reported missing: October 28, 2025<br />Location where remains were found: scorched earth approximately fifty feet from the back door<br />Status: body recovered<br /><br />- Silvia’s phone registered no movement toward any airport, border, or international travel corridor after the disappearance.<br />- Police entered the home on October 30, 2025, and found carpet, walls, and furniture with dark stains consistent with movement of biological material.<br />- A shop vacuum recovered from the property contained biological material despite attempts to clean the house.<br />- Drag marks led from the house toward the tree line and ended at a scorched patch of ground about fifty meters from the tree line where Silvia’s remains were found.<br />- On October 28, 2025, both husband David Garden and son Gabriel gave police accounts saying Silvia had left voluntarily-accounts that conflicted with each other and with the phone’s location data.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1454</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Message That Wasn't Hers: How Ariana Vanished Before Her Baby's Name</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-message-that-wasn-t-hers-how-ariana-vanished-before-her-baby-s-name--72879209</link><description><![CDATA[The Message That Wasn't Hers: How Ariana Vanished Before Her Baby's Name<br /><br />A short, wrong-sounding text arrived at 1:40 p.m. on June 14, 2024 - a plea for forgiveness from a daughter who never wrote it. Ariana Valentina Jiménez Andrade, 24, five months pregnant and named her son Ezequiel, left home that morning and never returned; who sent that message, and why did the rhythm of her words feel so wrong?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a university errand and a meeting in an isolated park to a missing thesis consultation, contradictory witness accounts, and a message that suggested a planned goodbye. How did phone records, fifty pieces of evidence, and more than twenty witnesses shape a case that ended with a conviction but left unanswered questions about the true charge?<br /><br />Person: Ariana Valentina Jiménez Andrade<br />Date: June 14, 2024, 1:40 p.m.<br />Location: Manabí, park and family home<br />Status: Missing; later case produced a conviction of twenty-two years in prison<br />Evidence: fifty pieces of evidence and more than twenty witnesses<br /><br />- Ariana was twenty-four years old and five months pregnant on June 14, 2024.<br />- The message arrived at 1:40 p.m. and said she was leaving and asked for forgiveness.<br />- Ariana had chosen the name Ezequiel for her unborn son.<br />- Investigators presented fifty pieces of evidence and more than twenty witnesses at trial.<br />- The convicted man received a twenty-two-year prison sentence and is appealing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879209</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879209/0698.mp3" length="25741952" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Message That Wasn't Hers: How Ariana Vanished Before Her Baby's Name&#13;
&#13;
A short, wrong-sounding text arrived at 1:40 p.m. on June 14, 2024 - a plea for forgiveness from a daughter who never wrote it. Ariana Valentina Jiménez Andrade, 24, five...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Message That Wasn't Hers: How Ariana Vanished Before Her Baby's Name<br /><br />A short, wrong-sounding text arrived at 1:40 p.m. on June 14, 2024 - a plea for forgiveness from a daughter who never wrote it. Ariana Valentina Jiménez Andrade, 24, five months pregnant and named her son Ezequiel, left home that morning and never returned; who sent that message, and why did the rhythm of her words feel so wrong?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a university errand and a meeting in an isolated park to a missing thesis consultation, contradictory witness accounts, and a message that suggested a planned goodbye. How did phone records, fifty pieces of evidence, and more than twenty witnesses shape a case that ended with a conviction but left unanswered questions about the true charge?<br /><br />Person: Ariana Valentina Jiménez Andrade<br />Date: June 14, 2024, 1:40 p.m.<br />Location: Manabí, park and family home<br />Status: Missing; later case produced a conviction of twenty-two years in prison<br />Evidence: fifty pieces of evidence and more than twenty witnesses<br /><br />- Ariana was twenty-four years old and five months pregnant on June 14, 2024.<br />- The message arrived at 1:40 p.m. and said she was leaving and asked for forgiveness.<br />- Ariana had chosen the name Ezequiel for her unborn son.<br />- Investigators presented fifty pieces of evidence and more than twenty witnesses at trial.<br />- The convicted man received a twenty-two-year prison sentence and is appealing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1609</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Knew He Was There: The Night Madison Scanned the Room</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-knew-he-was-there-the-night-madison-scanned-the-room--72879208</link><description><![CDATA[She Knew He Was There: The Night Madison Scanned the Room<br /><br />You can feel the moment before violence in the ordinary details: a teenage girl scanning faces at a restaurant, a mother who follows her car, and a restraining order still in progress-what happens in that gap? This episode follows the specific timeline and unanswered failures that led to a public, brutal attack in daylight and asks why protection arrived too late.<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from early April through June 3, 2023, tracing the relationship, the warning signs, the interrupted restraining order, and the choices made the afternoon Madison and her family left the restaurant. What did authorities and people around them miss that might have changed the outcome?<br /><br />Date: June 3, 2023<br />Person: Madison Chemit<br />Age: 17<br />Person: Spencer Pearson<br />Location: parking lot outside a restaurant in Florida<br /><br />- Madison was born around 2005 and had played softball since age 4.<br />- Spencer entered the restaurant at 15:47 and sat alone without ordering.<br />- Madison and a friend arrived at the restaurant at 14:53; Jackie followed in a separate car.<br />- Spencer had been admitted to a psychiatric facility in April after an apparent self-harm incident and stopped taking prescribed antidepressants.<br />- Jackie began filing for a restraining order after Spencer posted a threatening message; the police did not complete protection before June 3.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879208</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:36 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879208/0697.mp3" length="21606246" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Knew He Was There: The Night Madison Scanned the Room&#13;
&#13;
You can feel the moment before violence in the ordinary details: a teenage girl scanning faces at a restaurant, a mother who follows her car, and a restraining order still in progress-what...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Knew He Was There: The Night Madison Scanned the Room<br /><br />You can feel the moment before violence in the ordinary details: a teenage girl scanning faces at a restaurant, a mother who follows her car, and a restraining order still in progress-what happens in that gap? This episode follows the specific timeline and unanswered failures that led to a public, brutal attack in daylight and asks why protection arrived too late.<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from early April through June 3, 2023, tracing the relationship, the warning signs, the interrupted restraining order, and the choices made the afternoon Madison and her family left the restaurant. What did authorities and people around them miss that might have changed the outcome?<br /><br />Date: June 3, 2023<br />Person: Madison Chemit<br />Age: 17<br />Person: Spencer Pearson<br />Location: parking lot outside a restaurant in Florida<br /><br />- Madison was born around 2005 and had played softball since age 4.<br />- Spencer entered the restaurant at 15:47 and sat alone without ordering.<br />- Madison and a friend arrived at the restaurant at 14:53; Jackie followed in a separate car.<br />- Spencer had been admitted to a psychiatric facility in April after an apparent self-harm incident and stopped taking prescribed antidepressants.<br />- Jackie began filing for a restraining order after Spencer posted a threatening message; the police did not complete protection before June 3.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1351</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Night She Vanished: Concrete, Rope, and a Missing Motive</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-night-she-vanished-concrete-rope-and-a-missing-motive--72879207</link><description><![CDATA[The Night She Vanished: Concrete, Rope, and a Missing Motive<br /><br />A woman parked outside her mother's house at 3:00 a.m., called a friend to say she was home, and walked toward a door fewer than ten steps away-then vanished. Divers recovered Elizabeth Pul Arellano on April 16, 2016, weighed down by a 54-kilogram concrete block and a rope traced back to a specific backyard; who knew exactly what weight would hold her down?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from her last night, the discovery at the lake, and the pieces of evidence that linked the concrete and rope to a family home, asking how a disappearance that began in a few ordinary steps could be planned with such precision.<br /><br />Person: Elizabeth Pul Arellano<br />Date: April 16, 2016<br />Age: 28<br />Occupation: Certified medical assistant<br />Weight of concrete block: 54 kilograms<br /><br />- Elizabeth called a friend from her car around 3:00 a.m. to say she had arrived and hung up before exiting the vehicle.<br />- The distance from her parked car to her mother's front door was fewer than ten steps.<br />- Her car was found with keys in the ignition, wallet on the seat, and phone on the floor the next morning.<br />- Divers recovered her body from a Texas lake on April 16, 2016, still wearing a dark red medical uniform.<br />- The rope and concrete block tied to her body were identified as coming from the storage area in the backyard of the marital home.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879207</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879207/0696.mp3" length="26298673" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Night She Vanished: Concrete, Rope, and a Missing Motive&#13;
&#13;
A woman parked outside her mother's house at 3:00 a.m., called a friend to say she was home, and walked toward a door fewer than ten steps away-then vanished. Divers recovered Elizabeth...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Night She Vanished: Concrete, Rope, and a Missing Motive<br /><br />A woman parked outside her mother's house at 3:00 a.m., called a friend to say she was home, and walked toward a door fewer than ten steps away-then vanished. Divers recovered Elizabeth Pul Arellano on April 16, 2016, weighed down by a 54-kilogram concrete block and a rope traced back to a specific backyard; who knew exactly what weight would hold her down?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from her last night, the discovery at the lake, and the pieces of evidence that linked the concrete and rope to a family home, asking how a disappearance that began in a few ordinary steps could be planned with such precision.<br /><br />Person: Elizabeth Pul Arellano<br />Date: April 16, 2016<br />Age: 28<br />Occupation: Certified medical assistant<br />Weight of concrete block: 54 kilograms<br /><br />- Elizabeth called a friend from her car around 3:00 a.m. to say she had arrived and hung up before exiting the vehicle.<br />- The distance from her parked car to her mother's front door was fewer than ten steps.<br />- Her car was found with keys in the ignition, wallet on the seat, and phone on the floor the next morning.<br />- Divers recovered her body from a Texas lake on April 16, 2016, still wearing a dark red medical uniform.<br />- The rope and concrete block tied to her body were identified as coming from the storage area in the backyard of the marital home.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1644</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Night He Drove Her Body: The Kimberly Araya Vanishing</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-night-he-drove-her-body-the-kimberly-araya-vanishing--72879206</link><description><![CDATA[The Night He Drove Her Body: The Kimberly Araya Vanishing<br /><br />A neighbor's security camera caught a car leaving a Heredia home on April 18, 2024 with an anonymous, sheet-covered shape in the back seat and the front passenger seat empty - the driver was her husband. What was inside the sheets, why did the car head toward a tunnel thirty minutes away, and how did investigators piece together the missing hours?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from Kimberly Araya's last minutes alive through the surveillance footage, witness accounts, and official timeline discrepancies, asking whether the recorded movements and the husband's statements can be reconciled.<br /><br />Person: Kimberly Araya<br />Date: April 18-19, 2024<br />Location: Heredia, Costa Rica<br />Person: Dave Oldemar Pérez Mena<br />Device: Uniaje security camera<br /><br />- Kimberly Araya was born on August 29, 1990 and was age 33 at the time of her disappearance.<br />- Kimberly left work at 16:30 on Thursday, April 18, 2024 and was dropped near a shopping center by her supervisor.<br />- A second private driver dropped Kimberly at approximately 22:50 at the home address she had given.<br />- Neighbor camera footage timestamped Dave's car leaving the residence at 22:47, 53 minutes earlier than his claimed 23:40 departure.<br />- The car was registered to Dave's sister and was seen driving toward a tunnel about thirty minutes from the house with a large, sheet-covered shape in the back seat.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879206</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879206/0695.mp3" length="24331757" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Night He Drove Her Body: The Kimberly Araya Vanishing&#13;
&#13;
A neighbor's security camera caught a car leaving a Heredia home on April 18, 2024 with an anonymous, sheet-covered shape in the back seat and the front passenger seat empty - the driver was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Night He Drove Her Body: The Kimberly Araya Vanishing<br /><br />A neighbor's security camera caught a car leaving a Heredia home on April 18, 2024 with an anonymous, sheet-covered shape in the back seat and the front passenger seat empty - the driver was her husband. What was inside the sheets, why did the car head toward a tunnel thirty minutes away, and how did investigators piece together the missing hours?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from Kimberly Araya's last minutes alive through the surveillance footage, witness accounts, and official timeline discrepancies, asking whether the recorded movements and the husband's statements can be reconciled.<br /><br />Person: Kimberly Araya<br />Date: April 18-19, 2024<br />Location: Heredia, Costa Rica<br />Person: Dave Oldemar Pérez Mena<br />Device: Uniaje security camera<br /><br />- Kimberly Araya was born on August 29, 1990 and was age 33 at the time of her disappearance.<br />- Kimberly left work at 16:30 on Thursday, April 18, 2024 and was dropped near a shopping center by her supervisor.<br />- A second private driver dropped Kimberly at approximately 22:50 at the home address she had given.<br />- Neighbor camera footage timestamped Dave's car leaving the residence at 22:47, 53 minutes earlier than his claimed 23:40 departure.<br />- The car was registered to Dave's sister and was seen driving toward a tunnel about thirty minutes from the house with a large, sheet-covered shape in the back seat.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1521</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Rode to Help - Found Dead: The Abandoned Factory Secret</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-rode-to-help-found-dead-the-abandoned-factory-secret--72879205</link><description><![CDATA[He Rode to Help - Found Dead: The Abandoned Factory Secret<br /><br />A fifteen-year-old left on a bicycle with no phone or documents and was later found dead near an abandoned factory with his name written beside the body - who decided his fate before anyone even knew he was missing? The last image of Jeremías alive is a security-camera frame of him pedaling away at 2:30 p.m. on a December afternoon; four days later his remains were discovered in the weeds beside a drainage slab with his name and the date written in white.<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the security footage of Jeremías leaving home to the discovery at the factory, laying out what is known about the people he met and the evidence recovered, and we ask how a plan could have been carried out so calmly that a name was written after the killing.<br /><br />Person: Jeremías Monzón<br />Date: December 18<br />Location: Abandoned factory facing a soccer field in Santo Tomé, Santa Fe, Argentina<br />Last seen time: just after 2:30 p.m.<br />Discovery date: December 22<br /><br />- Jeremías left home wearing a black t-shirt, grey shorts, and blue sneakers.<br />- He had no phone because it had broken two days earlier and carried no documents or backpack.<br />- He went to meet Milagros Belén Altamirano, a sixteen-year-old he had been messaging online.<br />- Two boys, aged fourteen and fifteen, were already inside the factory when Jeremías arrived.<br />- A name "Jeremías" and the last-seen date were written in white on a drainage slab a few meters from the partially cardboard-covered remains.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879205</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:26 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879205/0694.mp3" length="23386334" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Rode to Help - Found Dead: The Abandoned Factory Secret&#13;
&#13;
A fifteen-year-old left on a bicycle with no phone or documents and was later found dead near an abandoned factory with his name written beside the body - who decided his fate before anyone...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Rode to Help - Found Dead: The Abandoned Factory Secret<br /><br />A fifteen-year-old left on a bicycle with no phone or documents and was later found dead near an abandoned factory with his name written beside the body - who decided his fate before anyone even knew he was missing? The last image of Jeremías alive is a security-camera frame of him pedaling away at 2:30 p.m. on a December afternoon; four days later his remains were discovered in the weeds beside a drainage slab with his name and the date written in white.<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the security footage of Jeremías leaving home to the discovery at the factory, laying out what is known about the people he met and the evidence recovered, and we ask how a plan could have been carried out so calmly that a name was written after the killing.<br /><br />Person: Jeremías Monzón<br />Date: December 18<br />Location: Abandoned factory facing a soccer field in Santo Tomé, Santa Fe, Argentina<br />Last seen time: just after 2:30 p.m.<br />Discovery date: December 22<br /><br />- Jeremías left home wearing a black t-shirt, grey shorts, and blue sneakers.<br />- He had no phone because it had broken two days earlier and carried no documents or backpack.<br />- He went to meet Milagros Belén Altamirano, a sixteen-year-old he had been messaging online.<br />- Two boys, aged fourteen and fifteen, were already inside the factory when Jeremías arrived.<br />- A name "Jeremías" and the last-seen date were written in white on a drainage slab a few meters from the partially cardboard-covered remains.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1462</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Shelf Against the Door: How Mia's Safety Failed Her</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-shelf-against-the-door-how-mia-s-safety-failed-her--72879204</link><description><![CDATA[The Shelf Against the Door: How Mia's Safety Failed Her<br /><br />A heavy bookshelf was pressed against a bedroom door from the inside, a detail the first officer noted before calling the disappearance voluntary - and the cameras never recorded her leaving. This episode follows how an electronic key scan at 2:15 p.m., a fabricated maintenance request at 7:00 p.m., and a master keyholder with prior violent conduct converged into a vanishing that would spur a law named for a nineteen-year-old - but why did the system fail her at every step?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the recorded entries, the physical scene inside the apartment, and the personnel whose actions or inaction shaped the case, closing on the question that drives the story: how did visible security and documented warnings still allow her to disappear?<br /><br />Person: Iman Marcano (Mia)<br />Date of birth: April 26, 2002<br />Date of disappearance: September 24, 2021<br />Employee with master key: Armando Manuel Caballero, 27 years old<br />Officer on scene: Samir Paulino<br /><br />- Armando's electronic key scanned Mia's apartment door at 2:15 p.m. on September 24, 2021.<br />- Security cameras captured Mia arriving at approximately 5:00 p.m. and did not record her leaving.<br />- At 7:00 p.m. Armando entered a false maintenance request for Mia's apartment in the building system.<br />- Officer Samir Paulino arrived at the apartment at approximately 10:00 p.m. the same night.<br />- Inside the bedroom the bookshelf was pressed against the door from the inside, the window locks installed by Mia's father were removed, a reddish mark was on a pillow, and a packed suitcase remained untouched.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879204</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879204/0693.mp3" length="27421730" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Shelf Against the Door: How Mia's Safety Failed Her&#13;
&#13;
A heavy bookshelf was pressed against a bedroom door from the inside, a detail the first officer noted before calling the disappearance voluntary - and the cameras never recorded her leaving....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Shelf Against the Door: How Mia's Safety Failed Her<br /><br />A heavy bookshelf was pressed against a bedroom door from the inside, a detail the first officer noted before calling the disappearance voluntary - and the cameras never recorded her leaving. This episode follows how an electronic key scan at 2:15 p.m., a fabricated maintenance request at 7:00 p.m., and a master keyholder with prior violent conduct converged into a vanishing that would spur a law named for a nineteen-year-old - but why did the system fail her at every step?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the recorded entries, the physical scene inside the apartment, and the personnel whose actions or inaction shaped the case, closing on the question that drives the story: how did visible security and documented warnings still allow her to disappear?<br /><br />Person: Iman Marcano (Mia)<br />Date of birth: April 26, 2002<br />Date of disappearance: September 24, 2021<br />Employee with master key: Armando Manuel Caballero, 27 years old<br />Officer on scene: Samir Paulino<br /><br />- Armando's electronic key scanned Mia's apartment door at 2:15 p.m. on September 24, 2021.<br />- Security cameras captured Mia arriving at approximately 5:00 p.m. and did not record her leaving.<br />- At 7:00 p.m. Armando entered a false maintenance request for Mia's apartment in the building system.<br />- Officer Samir Paulino arrived at the apartment at approximately 10:00 p.m. the same night.<br />- Inside the bedroom the bookshelf was pressed against the door from the inside, the window locks installed by Mia's father were removed, a reddish mark was on a pillow, and a packed suitcase remained untouched.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1714</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Had a Restraining Order - He Came Back With a Key</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-had-a-restraining-order-he-came-back-with-a-key--72879203</link><description><![CDATA[She Had a Restraining Order - He Came Back With a Key<br /><br />A judge signed a restraining order to keep him away, and four days later a man with a duplicate key walked through her unlocked door at 2:09 a.m.; the last photo of Jimena shows her laughing on horseback just six days before she was found unresponsive. How did a legal boundary, a broken door and phone-tower footage fail to stop what came next?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the timeline from the moment Jimena Colman obtained her protection order to the night someone used a key to enter her house, following phone tower data, camera footage and witness accounts to ask why the law’s paper barrier wasn’t enough. What gaps in response and evidence let him approach again despite the order?<br /><br />Person: Jimena Yasmín Colman Jiménez<br />Person: Víctor Manuel Cabrera Valiente<br />Person: Celso Fabián López Rojas<br />Date: December 10, 2025 (restraining order granted)<br />Date: December 15, 2025 (entry at approximately 2:09 a.m.)<br /><br />- Jimena was 23 years old and held the local title reina jinete (queen rider).<br />- Víctor was 46 years old, 23 years older than Jimena.<br />- The restraining order had been in effect for five days when Víctor returned.<br />- Víctor kicked a door in on December 14 and threatened Jimena and Celso before leaving.<br />- Security camera footage and phone-tower data place Víctor outside the bar from around midnight into the early hours before the December 15 entry.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879203</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:19 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879203/0692.mp3" length="24478043" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Had a Restraining Order - He Came Back With a Key&#13;
&#13;
A judge signed a restraining order to keep him away, and four days later a man with a duplicate key walked through her unlocked door at 2:09 a.m.; the last photo of Jimena shows her laughing on...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Had a Restraining Order - He Came Back With a Key<br /><br />A judge signed a restraining order to keep him away, and four days later a man with a duplicate key walked through her unlocked door at 2:09 a.m.; the last photo of Jimena shows her laughing on horseback just six days before she was found unresponsive. How did a legal boundary, a broken door and phone-tower footage fail to stop what came next?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the timeline from the moment Jimena Colman obtained her protection order to the night someone used a key to enter her house, following phone tower data, camera footage and witness accounts to ask why the law’s paper barrier wasn’t enough. What gaps in response and evidence let him approach again despite the order?<br /><br />Person: Jimena Yasmín Colman Jiménez<br />Person: Víctor Manuel Cabrera Valiente<br />Person: Celso Fabián López Rojas<br />Date: December 10, 2025 (restraining order granted)<br />Date: December 15, 2025 (entry at approximately 2:09 a.m.)<br /><br />- Jimena was 23 years old and held the local title reina jinete (queen rider).<br />- Víctor was 46 years old, 23 years older than Jimena.<br />- The restraining order had been in effect for five days when Víctor returned.<br />- Víctor kicked a door in on December 14 and threatened Jimena and Celso before leaving.<br />- Security camera footage and phone-tower data place Víctor outside the bar from around midnight into the early hours before the December 15 entry.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1530</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Night a Child's Smile Turned Silent: Inside Derek Rosa</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-night-a-child-s-smile-turned-silent-inside-derek-rosa--72879202</link><description><![CDATA[The Night a Child's Smile Turned Silent: Inside Derek Rosa<br /><br />A thirteen-year-old honor student sent methodical online searches for how to kill with a bladed weapon, photographed a murder scene, and then called 911 calmly - what broke the silence no one can explain? How did the boy in a spring family photo become the reason his mother never held her newborn daughter?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the chronology, the recordings, and the physical evidence inside the southern Miami apartment to show what is known and what remains unanswered about the night of October 12, 2023. We follow the recordings from the baby monitor, the front-door camera footage, forensic findings and Derek’s own words to ask whether any single fact explains why this happened.<br /><br />Person: Derek Rosa<br />Person: Irina García<br />Date: October 12, 2023<br />Location: southern Miami<br />Event: infant’s death captured on baby monitor<br /><br />- The baby was approximately 14 days old on the night Irina García died.<br />- Derek was 13 years old when he left his bedroom just before midnight on October 12, 2023.<br />- Frank Ramos kept two legally registered firearms in the apartment that were left unsecured.<br />- Investigators found online searches by Derek for how to kill a person using a bladed weapon in the weeks before the crime.<br />- After the attack, Derek sent images of the crime scene and his hands to an online gaming contact before calling 911.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879202</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:16 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879202/0691.mp3" length="26264819" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Night a Child's Smile Turned Silent: Inside Derek Rosa&#13;
&#13;
A thirteen-year-old honor student sent methodical online searches for how to kill with a bladed weapon, photographed a murder scene, and then called 911 calmly - what broke the silence no...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Night a Child's Smile Turned Silent: Inside Derek Rosa<br /><br />A thirteen-year-old honor student sent methodical online searches for how to kill with a bladed weapon, photographed a murder scene, and then called 911 calmly - what broke the silence no one can explain? How did the boy in a spring family photo become the reason his mother never held her newborn daughter?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the chronology, the recordings, and the physical evidence inside the southern Miami apartment to show what is known and what remains unanswered about the night of October 12, 2023. We follow the recordings from the baby monitor, the front-door camera footage, forensic findings and Derek’s own words to ask whether any single fact explains why this happened.<br /><br />Person: Derek Rosa<br />Person: Irina García<br />Date: October 12, 2023<br />Location: southern Miami<br />Event: infant’s death captured on baby monitor<br /><br />- The baby was approximately 14 days old on the night Irina García died.<br />- Derek was 13 years old when he left his bedroom just before midnight on October 12, 2023.<br />- Frank Ramos kept two legally registered firearms in the apartment that were left unsecured.<br />- Investigators found online searches by Derek for how to kill a person using a bladed weapon in the weeks before the crime.<br />- After the attack, Derek sent images of the crime scene and his hands to an online gaming contact before calling 911.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1642</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Came Back Calm, Warm Food in Hand - Where Was She?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-came-back-calm-warm-food-in-hand-where-was-she--72879201</link><description><![CDATA[She Came Back Calm, Warm Food in Hand - Where Was She?<br /><br />Warm food in her hands, pajamas on her body, serene on a central Mexican street at 4 p.m. after five days missing - and her nine-month pregnancy was gone. Who gave her that meal, and why did her phone records show movement into another jurisdiction without public detail?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of Lidia Valdivia Juárez’s disappearance and return, the family’s search and public defense of her pregnancy, and the investigative steps that produced more questions than answers about where she had been and what she lost.<br /><br />Person: Lidia Valdivia Juárez<br />Age: 25 years old<br />Family status: Mother of two, wife, reported nine months pregnant<br />Disappearance start: January 17, 2026 (left parents' house late that night)<br />Return found: walking in central Mexico at 4:00 p.m. after five days missing<br />Last known vehicle: black Chevrolet Malibu<br /><br />- Lidia left her parents' house on the night of Saturday, January 17, 2026.<br />- At 2:30 a.m. on January 18, her husband Luis received texts and a voice note saying men on motorcycles were following her.<br />- Luis filed a formal missing persons report the morning of January 18 and named a black Chevrolet Malibu as the last known vehicle.<br />- Authorities confirmed on January 19 that her phone signal had moved and crossed into a different jurisdiction, without disclosing locations.<br />- On January 21 social media posts claimed she was not pregnant, prompting the family to publish photographs and medical studies showing a visible pregnancy.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879201</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:12 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879201/0690.mp3" length="24899346" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Came Back Calm, Warm Food in Hand - Where Was She?&#13;
&#13;
Warm food in her hands, pajamas on her body, serene on a central Mexican street at 4 p.m. after five days missing - and her nine-month pregnancy was gone. Who gave her that meal, and why did...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Came Back Calm, Warm Food in Hand - Where Was She?<br /><br />Warm food in her hands, pajamas on her body, serene on a central Mexican street at 4 p.m. after five days missing - and her nine-month pregnancy was gone. Who gave her that meal, and why did her phone records show movement into another jurisdiction without public detail?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of Lidia Valdivia Juárez’s disappearance and return, the family’s search and public defense of her pregnancy, and the investigative steps that produced more questions than answers about where she had been and what she lost.<br /><br />Person: Lidia Valdivia Juárez<br />Age: 25 years old<br />Family status: Mother of two, wife, reported nine months pregnant<br />Disappearance start: January 17, 2026 (left parents' house late that night)<br />Return found: walking in central Mexico at 4:00 p.m. after five days missing<br />Last known vehicle: black Chevrolet Malibu<br /><br />- Lidia left her parents' house on the night of Saturday, January 17, 2026.<br />- At 2:30 a.m. on January 18, her husband Luis received texts and a voice note saying men on motorcycles were following her.<br />- Luis filed a formal missing persons report the morning of January 18 and named a black Chevrolet Malibu as the last known vehicle.<br />- Authorities confirmed on January 19 that her phone signal had moved and crossed into a different jurisdiction, without disclosing locations.<br />- On January 21 social media posts claimed she was not pregnant, prompting the family to publish photographs and medical studies showing a visible pregnancy.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1557</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Walked Out at 2 AM - The House That Kept Her Silent</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-walked-out-at-2-am-the-house-that-kept-her-silent--72879200</link><description><![CDATA[She Walked Out at 2 AM - The House That Kept Her Silent<br /><br />She stumbled to a friend's door at around 2:00 a.m., barefoot and bleeding from a head wound that later required four surgical staples, after having been missing for 680 days; what she described inside the house fits nothing neat and leaves one central question: how can a person live unseen for nearly two years in a home with neighbors, visitors, and regular errands? What happened behind that patio wall that kept her invisible?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the night she returned to the court-confirmed injuries and the conflicting pieces of evidence presented by those who lived at the property, and we ask whether the official record can hold the full truth.<br /><br />Person: Salma<br />Date of birth: 29 October 1987<br />Date of reporting missing: 1 April 2024<br />Arrest date: 10 February 2026<br />Location: Murcia, Spain<br /><br />- Salma was missing for 680 days before arriving at a friend's door.<br />- Police arrested Alberto, age 50, on 10 February 2026 at a single-story house outside a town of about 5,000 people.<br />- Medical exam required four surgical staples to close the head wound Salma had when she arrived at Juan's house.<br />- Salma told investigators she left the house only once in 22 months for a clinic visit accompanied by María.<br />- Videos provided by Alberto's legal team show Salma at a family celebration on 1 November 2025 and at her 38th birthday on 29 October 2025.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879200</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879200/0689.mp3" length="27544192" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Walked Out at 2 AM - The House That Kept Her Silent&#13;
&#13;
She stumbled to a friend's door at around 2:00 a.m., barefoot and bleeding from a head wound that later required four surgical staples, after having been missing for 680 days; what she...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Walked Out at 2 AM - The House That Kept Her Silent<br /><br />She stumbled to a friend's door at around 2:00 a.m., barefoot and bleeding from a head wound that later required four surgical staples, after having been missing for 680 days; what she described inside the house fits nothing neat and leaves one central question: how can a person live unseen for nearly two years in a home with neighbors, visitors, and regular errands? What happened behind that patio wall that kept her invisible?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the night she returned to the court-confirmed injuries and the conflicting pieces of evidence presented by those who lived at the property, and we ask whether the official record can hold the full truth.<br /><br />Person: Salma<br />Date of birth: 29 October 1987<br />Date of reporting missing: 1 April 2024<br />Arrest date: 10 February 2026<br />Location: Murcia, Spain<br /><br />- Salma was missing for 680 days before arriving at a friend's door.<br />- Police arrested Alberto, age 50, on 10 February 2026 at a single-story house outside a town of about 5,000 people.<br />- Medical exam required four surgical staples to close the head wound Salma had when she arrived at Juan's house.<br />- Salma told investigators she left the house only once in 22 months for a clinic visit accompanied by María.<br />- Videos provided by Alberto's legal team show Salma at a family celebration on 1 November 2025 and at her 38th birthday on 29 October 2025.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1722</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>I Would Never Hurt You: The Hotel Room That Lied</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/i-would-never-hurt-you-the-hotel-room-that-lied--72879199</link><description><![CDATA[I Would Never Hurt You: The Hotel Room That Lied<br /><br />A luxury hotel room in Orlando held a gun with only one person's DNA on the trigger, a towel on the floor, and a text that read "I would never hurt you physically" sent days earlier - so why did the woman who called 911 say she stepped out for a moment and found her girlfriend shot? What really happened in those minutes inside the room?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the December 8, 2023 10:44 PM 911 call through the initial police and forensic findings, laying out the messages, evidence, and statements that frame the central question: did this end in suicide or something else?<br /><br />Person: Alana Micolis<br />Person: Mega Saluja<br />Date: December 8, 2023<br />Location: Orlando, Florida<br />Event: 10:44 PM 911 call reporting a shooting<br /><br />- Alana was 27 years old and a marine biologist born December 21, 1996.<br />- Mega's DNA was the only DNA found on the gun's grip and trigger.<br />- Mega texted Alana days before the trip: "I would never hurt you physically."<br />- Paramedics arrived within seconds and transported Alana with a gunshot wound to her left temple.<br />- Alana, right-handed, texted her father that she would be home earlier than planned on the night of December 8.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879199</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879199/0688.mp3" length="24243986" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>I Would Never Hurt You: The Hotel Room That Lied&#13;
&#13;
A luxury hotel room in Orlando held a gun with only one person's DNA on the trigger, a towel on the floor, and a text that read "I would never hurt you physically" sent days earlier - so why did the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[I Would Never Hurt You: The Hotel Room That Lied<br /><br />A luxury hotel room in Orlando held a gun with only one person's DNA on the trigger, a towel on the floor, and a text that read "I would never hurt you physically" sent days earlier - so why did the woman who called 911 say she stepped out for a moment and found her girlfriend shot? What really happened in those minutes inside the room?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the December 8, 2023 10:44 PM 911 call through the initial police and forensic findings, laying out the messages, evidence, and statements that frame the central question: did this end in suicide or something else?<br /><br />Person: Alana Micolis<br />Person: Mega Saluja<br />Date: December 8, 2023<br />Location: Orlando, Florida<br />Event: 10:44 PM 911 call reporting a shooting<br /><br />- Alana was 27 years old and a marine biologist born December 21, 1996.<br />- Mega's DNA was the only DNA found on the gun's grip and trigger.<br />- Mega texted Alana days before the trip: "I would never hurt you physically."<br />- Paramedics arrived within seconds and transported Alana with a gunshot wound to her left temple.<br />- Alana, right-handed, texted her father that she would be home earlier than planned on the night of December 8.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1516</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Last Ordinary Footage: Where Did Vera Kratzova Vanish?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-last-ordinary-footage-where-did-vera-kratzova-vanish--72879198</link><description><![CDATA[The Last Ordinary Footage: Where Did Vera Kratzova Vanish?<br /><br />The last confirmed footage of Vera Kratzova shows a 26-year-old from Minsk calmly walking through a Bangkok airport on September 20, 2025 - alone, unhurried, and boarding a flight to Myanmar. Fourteen days later her phone went silent after a voice message mentioning a two-day journey, river crossings and armed clashes; what happened in those two weeks could upend every assumption about her disappearance.<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Vera's return to Minsk to say goodbye, through the job offer that covered her flight, to the last messages she sent from Southeast Asia. How did a routine-looking recruitment and an ordinary airport scene become the final confirmed traces of her life?<br /><br />Person: Vera Kratzova<br />Date of birth: December 31, 1998<br />Last confirmed footage: September 20, 2025, Bangkok airport<br />Last voice message: September 25, 2025 - mentions two-day journey, river crossing, armed clashes<br />Silence began: October 4, 2025<br /><br />- Vera had been based in China since 2018 and worked across Singapore, Hong Kong and Vietnam.<br />- The job offer promised a salary between $5,000 and $8,000 per month and covered the flight.<br />- Vera landed in Bangkok on September 15, 2025, and contacted her family sounding calm.<br />- On September 20, 2025 she was recorded by security cameras boarding a flight to Myanmar alone and calm.<br />- Fourteen days after her September 25 voice message she stopped responding to calls and texts, with silence starting October 4, 2025.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879198</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:54:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879198/0687.mp3" length="29576309" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Last Ordinary Footage: Where Did Vera Kratzova Vanish?&#13;
&#13;
The last confirmed footage of Vera Kratzova shows a 26-year-old from Minsk calmly walking through a Bangkok airport on September 20, 2025 - alone, unhurried, and boarding a flight to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Last Ordinary Footage: Where Did Vera Kratzova Vanish?<br /><br />The last confirmed footage of Vera Kratzova shows a 26-year-old from Minsk calmly walking through a Bangkok airport on September 20, 2025 - alone, unhurried, and boarding a flight to Myanmar. Fourteen days later her phone went silent after a voice message mentioning a two-day journey, river crossings and armed clashes; what happened in those two weeks could upend every assumption about her disappearance.<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Vera's return to Minsk to say goodbye, through the job offer that covered her flight, to the last messages she sent from Southeast Asia. How did a routine-looking recruitment and an ordinary airport scene become the final confirmed traces of her life?<br /><br />Person: Vera Kratzova<br />Date of birth: December 31, 1998<br />Last confirmed footage: September 20, 2025, Bangkok airport<br />Last voice message: September 25, 2025 - mentions two-day journey, river crossing, armed clashes<br />Silence began: October 4, 2025<br /><br />- Vera had been based in China since 2018 and worked across Singapore, Hong Kong and Vietnam.<br />- The job offer promised a salary between $5,000 and $8,000 per month and covered the flight.<br />- Vera landed in Bangkok on September 15, 2025, and contacted her family sounding calm.<br />- On September 20, 2025 she was recorded by security cameras boarding a flight to Myanmar alone and calm.<br />- Fourteen days after her September 25 voice message she stopped responding to calls and texts, with silence starting October 4, 2025.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1849</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Her Location Stopped: The Taxi That Never Reached Samay</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/her-location-stopped-the-taxi-that-never-reached-samay--72879197</link><description><![CDATA[Her Location Stopped: The Taxi That Never Reached Samay<br /><br />A shared location frozen in mid-route turned a routine taxi ride into a last trace of a life: at 1:30 p.m. on February 17, 2016, Samay texted her mother that the driver was rude and circling, then her live location stopped moving and her phone went dark. How did a public GPS ping become the final breadcrumb before a body was found and a conviction was secured?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a midday errand to the moment the location signal vanished and beyond, tracing the people, decisions, and evidence that led to a conviction - and the cold detail that still doesn’t feel closed. What did the frozen location reveal that nothing else could?<br /><br />Person: Samaya Alejandra Márquez Salgado<br />Date: February 17, 2016<br />Location: Puebla<br />Age: 25<br />Status: Deceased<br /><br />- Samay sent a text to her mother at approximately 1:30 p.m. saying the taxi driver was rude and taking wrong turns.<br />- Her family received the last message between 1:25 and 2:00 p.m., after which her shared location stopped moving.<br />- Three days later a body was found in an empty lot on the southern edge of Puebla and identified by tattoos.<br />- The medical report listed a gunshot wound as cause of death and multiple blows to the face.<br />- A man was convicted and sentenced to forty years in connection with the case.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879197</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:57 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879197/0686.mp3" length="23141410" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Her Location Stopped: The Taxi That Never Reached Samay&#13;
&#13;
A shared location frozen in mid-route turned a routine taxi ride into a last trace of a life: at 1:30 p.m. on February 17, 2016, Samay texted her mother that the driver was rude and circling,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Her Location Stopped: The Taxi That Never Reached Samay<br /><br />A shared location frozen in mid-route turned a routine taxi ride into a last trace of a life: at 1:30 p.m. on February 17, 2016, Samay texted her mother that the driver was rude and circling, then her live location stopped moving and her phone went dark. How did a public GPS ping become the final breadcrumb before a body was found and a conviction was secured?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a midday errand to the moment the location signal vanished and beyond, tracing the people, decisions, and evidence that led to a conviction - and the cold detail that still doesn’t feel closed. What did the frozen location reveal that nothing else could?<br /><br />Person: Samaya Alejandra Márquez Salgado<br />Date: February 17, 2016<br />Location: Puebla<br />Age: 25<br />Status: Deceased<br /><br />- Samay sent a text to her mother at approximately 1:30 p.m. saying the taxi driver was rude and taking wrong turns.<br />- Her family received the last message between 1:25 and 2:00 p.m., after which her shared location stopped moving.<br />- Three days later a body was found in an empty lot on the southern edge of Puebla and identified by tattoos.<br />- The medical report listed a gunshot wound as cause of death and multiple blows to the face.<br />- A man was convicted and sentenced to forty years in connection with the case.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1447</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Lived Her Life: The Woman Found Tied to a Desert Signpost</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-lived-her-life-the-woman-found-tied-to-a-desert-signpost--72879196</link><description><![CDATA[He Lived Her Life: The Woman Found Tied to a Desert Signpost<br /><br />A child stopped to use the bathroom and discovered a small body bound with zip ties and a taped plastic bag over the head in the Nevada desert - unidentified for weeks while someone used her phone and answered her messages. How could Jamie Ray Feden, who required constant medical care and stood around four feet two inches tall, end up tied to a signpost and then have her life continued online after she was dead?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the known timeline from September 15, 2019, when Jamie left Pennsylvania with John Matthew Chapman, through their arrival in Las Vegas on September 23, to the desert trip on September 25, and the subsequent discovery and confusion over postmortem phone activity. What do the travel records, online activity, and Chapman's account reveal about the last days of Jamie Ray Feden?<br /><br />Person: Jamie Ray Feden<br />Date of disappearance/death: September 25, 2019<br />Person: John Matthew Chapman<br />Location: Nevada desert / Las Vegas<br />Medical condition: Bartter syndrome<br /><br />- Jamie was born April 13, 1986, and was 33 years old when she left Pennsylvania on September 15, 2019.<br />- Jamie was approximately 4 feet 2 inches tall and weighed around 75 pounds.<br />- Travel records place Jamie and Chapman arriving in Las Vegas on September 23, 2019, after an eight-day drive.<br />- Jamie was photographed alive and smiling in Las Vegas on September 23 or 24, 2019; two days later she was found dead.<br />- The boy who discovered the body was eight years old and had walked a short distance from his father's stopped truck.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879196</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879196/0685.mp3" length="22828776" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Lived Her Life: The Woman Found Tied to a Desert Signpost&#13;
&#13;
A child stopped to use the bathroom and discovered a small body bound with zip ties and a taped plastic bag over the head in the Nevada desert - unidentified for weeks while someone used...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Lived Her Life: The Woman Found Tied to a Desert Signpost<br /><br />A child stopped to use the bathroom and discovered a small body bound with zip ties and a taped plastic bag over the head in the Nevada desert - unidentified for weeks while someone used her phone and answered her messages. How could Jamie Ray Feden, who required constant medical care and stood around four feet two inches tall, end up tied to a signpost and then have her life continued online after she was dead?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the known timeline from September 15, 2019, when Jamie left Pennsylvania with John Matthew Chapman, through their arrival in Las Vegas on September 23, to the desert trip on September 25, and the subsequent discovery and confusion over postmortem phone activity. What do the travel records, online activity, and Chapman's account reveal about the last days of Jamie Ray Feden?<br /><br />Person: Jamie Ray Feden<br />Date of disappearance/death: September 25, 2019<br />Person: John Matthew Chapman<br />Location: Nevada desert / Las Vegas<br />Medical condition: Bartter syndrome<br /><br />- Jamie was born April 13, 1986, and was 33 years old when she left Pennsylvania on September 15, 2019.<br />- Jamie was approximately 4 feet 2 inches tall and weighed around 75 pounds.<br />- Travel records place Jamie and Chapman arriving in Las Vegas on September 23, 2019, after an eight-day drive.<br />- Jamie was photographed alive and smiling in Las Vegas on September 23 or 24, 2019; two days later she was found dead.<br />- The boy who discovered the body was eight years old and had walked a short distance from his father's stopped truck.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1427</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Six Blocks from Home: The Night Malena Never Returned</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/six-blocks-from-home-the-night-malena-never-returned--72879195</link><description><![CDATA[Six Blocks from Home: The Night Malena Never Returned<br /><br />Six blocks should have meant safety, but on the night of February 22, 2026, Malena Maidana was found bleeding on the pavement with multiple stab wounds and a deep cut across her throat. How did a routine walk six blocks from her front door end with a 26-year-old mother dead and a 22-year-old man seen washing his hands in a ditch less than fifteen minutes later?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events captured by low-resolution neighborhood cameras, the timeline between Malena’s last recorded frame and the suspect’s frantic actions, and the evidence investigators found at a nearby home - asking how ordinary streets became the scene of extraordinary violence.<br /><br />Person: Malena Maidana<br />Age: 26<br />Date: February 22, 2026<br />Location: Esisa, south of Buenos Aires<br />Suspect: Nahuel Lao de Os, 22<br /><br />- Malena left at 8:45 PM carrying a small purse, a bottle of water, and her phone.<br />- Emergency services arrived before midnight to a recording of a woman screaming near a golf course.<br />- Less than 15 minutes passed between Malena’s last appearance on camera and the man washing his hands in a drainage ditch.<br />- Investigators found damp clothes hanging inside the suspect’s house matching camera footage and shoe placement near the door.<br />- A collection of blades was found in the house, at least one consistent with the wound that killed Malena.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879195</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:50 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879195/0684.mp3" length="24653586" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Six Blocks from Home: The Night Malena Never Returned&#13;
&#13;
Six blocks should have meant safety, but on the night of February 22, 2026, Malena Maidana was found bleeding on the pavement with multiple stab wounds and a deep cut across her throat. How did...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Six Blocks from Home: The Night Malena Never Returned<br /><br />Six blocks should have meant safety, but on the night of February 22, 2026, Malena Maidana was found bleeding on the pavement with multiple stab wounds and a deep cut across her throat. How did a routine walk six blocks from her front door end with a 26-year-old mother dead and a 22-year-old man seen washing his hands in a ditch less than fifteen minutes later?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events captured by low-resolution neighborhood cameras, the timeline between Malena’s last recorded frame and the suspect’s frantic actions, and the evidence investigators found at a nearby home - asking how ordinary streets became the scene of extraordinary violence.<br /><br />Person: Malena Maidana<br />Age: 26<br />Date: February 22, 2026<br />Location: Esisa, south of Buenos Aires<br />Suspect: Nahuel Lao de Os, 22<br /><br />- Malena left at 8:45 PM carrying a small purse, a bottle of water, and her phone.<br />- Emergency services arrived before midnight to a recording of a woman screaming near a golf course.<br />- Less than 15 minutes passed between Malena’s last appearance on camera and the man washing his hands in a drainage ditch.<br />- Investigators found damp clothes hanging inside the suspect’s house matching camera footage and shoe placement near the door.<br />- A collection of blades was found in the house, at least one consistent with the wound that killed Malena.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1541</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Asked Her Mother to Bury Him - Then They Hid Him in a Barrel</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-asked-her-mother-to-bury-him-then-they-hid-him-in-a-barrel--72879194</link><description><![CDATA[She Asked Her Mother to Bury Him - Then They Hid Him in a Barrel<br /><br />A sixty-two-year-old nurse dismembered her son and hid his body in a metal barrel in her garage while a six-month-old baby slept in the house; within hours both women confessed. How does a warm, generous neighbor and a trained psychologist plan a murder that unfolds over six months and ends with a funeral and handcuffs?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the evidence recovered at the scene, from the sedative-laced lemonade to insulin theft to the metal barrel and quicklime, and explore the unanswered questions investigators kept returning to: what turned months of conversation into a lethal plan?<br /><br />Person: Lorena Venier<br />Person: Milyn Castro Monsalvo<br />Person: Alesandro Venier<br />Date: July 31, 2025<br />Location: northern Italy<br /><br />- The body had been in the garage for six days, divided into three parts and sealed inside a metal barrel.<br />- Lorena, age 62, purchased quicklime and covered the remains; dismemberment was post-mortem.<br />- Forensic team confirmed cause of death as asphyxiation; quicklime slowed but did not destroy evidence.<br />- On the night of July 25, Alesandro was given a lemonade made with a full blister pack of sedative tablets.<br />- Lorena admitted stealing insulin from her hospital job and two injections were administered while Alesandro was unconscious.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879194</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879194/0683.mp3" length="23986941" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Asked Her Mother to Bury Him - Then They Hid Him in a Barrel&#13;
&#13;
A sixty-two-year-old nurse dismembered her son and hid his body in a metal barrel in her garage while a six-month-old baby slept in the house; within hours both women confessed. How...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Asked Her Mother to Bury Him - Then They Hid Him in a Barrel<br /><br />A sixty-two-year-old nurse dismembered her son and hid his body in a metal barrel in her garage while a six-month-old baby slept in the house; within hours both women confessed. How does a warm, generous neighbor and a trained psychologist plan a murder that unfolds over six months and ends with a funeral and handcuffs?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the evidence recovered at the scene, from the sedative-laced lemonade to insulin theft to the metal barrel and quicklime, and explore the unanswered questions investigators kept returning to: what turned months of conversation into a lethal plan?<br /><br />Person: Lorena Venier<br />Person: Milyn Castro Monsalvo<br />Person: Alesandro Venier<br />Date: July 31, 2025<br />Location: northern Italy<br /><br />- The body had been in the garage for six days, divided into three parts and sealed inside a metal barrel.<br />- Lorena, age 62, purchased quicklime and covered the remains; dismemberment was post-mortem.<br />- Forensic team confirmed cause of death as asphyxiation; quicklime slowed but did not destroy evidence.<br />- On the night of July 25, Alesandro was given a lemonade made with a full blister pack of sedative tablets.<br />- Lorena admitted stealing insulin from her hospital job and two injections were administered while Alesandro was unconscious.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1500</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Girl They Buried Whole: Three DNAs, One Unanswered Night</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-girl-they-buried-whole-three-dnas-one-unanswered-night--72879193</link><description><![CDATA[The Girl They Buried Whole: Three DNAs, One Unanswered Night<br /><br />A sealed zinc coffin kept a body so intact examiners could still read injuries sixteen years after the murder, and three different men's DNA was later found on Nicole Vananderhk - only one man ever convicted and only one still alive to explain what happened. What happened the morning Nicole rode away and never arrived, and why did it take a confession on social media to reopen the case?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the chronological story from Nicole's last breakfast with her grandmother on October 6, 1995, through the discovery of her bicycle in a river that afternoon, to the finding of her body forty-seven days later and the later DNA revelations - can those threads finally answer who did this?<br /><br />Person: Nicole Vananderhk<br />Date: October 6, 1995<br />Discovery: November 22, 1995<br />Age: 15 years<br />Cause: Violent assault with head and finger injuries, fractured jaw, and chest puncture wound<br /><br />- Nicole rode to work on a bicycle the morning of October 6, 1995 and never arrived.<br />- Her bicycle was found that same afternoon at the bottom of a river halfway between her grandmother's house and the grocery store.<br />- Her body was discovered by a hiker on November 22, 1995, roughly ten kilometers from her grandmother's house.<br />- Forensic examiners determined Nicole died on October 6, 1995, the same morning she disappeared.<br />- Three separate men's DNA was later found on Nicole's remains; only one man was ever convicted and only one remains alive to answer questions.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879193</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:44 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879193/0682.mp3" length="26421553" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Girl They Buried Whole: Three DNAs, One Unanswered Night&#13;
&#13;
A sealed zinc coffin kept a body so intact examiners could still read injuries sixteen years after the murder, and three different men's DNA was later found on Nicole Vananderhk - only...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Girl They Buried Whole: Three DNAs, One Unanswered Night<br /><br />A sealed zinc coffin kept a body so intact examiners could still read injuries sixteen years after the murder, and three different men's DNA was later found on Nicole Vananderhk - only one man ever convicted and only one still alive to explain what happened. What happened the morning Nicole rode away and never arrived, and why did it take a confession on social media to reopen the case?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the chronological story from Nicole's last breakfast with her grandmother on October 6, 1995, through the discovery of her bicycle in a river that afternoon, to the finding of her body forty-seven days later and the later DNA revelations - can those threads finally answer who did this?<br /><br />Person: Nicole Vananderhk<br />Date: October 6, 1995<br />Discovery: November 22, 1995<br />Age: 15 years<br />Cause: Violent assault with head and finger injuries, fractured jaw, and chest puncture wound<br /><br />- Nicole rode to work on a bicycle the morning of October 6, 1995 and never arrived.<br />- Her bicycle was found that same afternoon at the bottom of a river halfway between her grandmother's house and the grocery store.<br />- Her body was discovered by a hiker on November 22, 1995, roughly ten kilometers from her grandmother's house.<br />- Forensic examiners determined Nicole died on October 6, 1995, the same morning she disappeared.<br />- Three separate men's DNA was later found on Nicole's remains; only one man was ever convicted and only one remains alive to answer questions.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1652</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Posted Justice at 8AM - Killed an Hour Later on Tlaxcala Street</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-posted-justice-at-8am-killed-an-hour-later-on-tlaxcala-street--72879192</link><description><![CDATA[She Posted Justice at 8AM - Killed an Hour Later on Tlaxcala Street<br /><br />Her Saturday morning post quoted a Uruguayan legal scholar and wished followers a good morning - sixty minutes later she was dead on Tlaxcala Street. A motorcycle trailed her at a measured distance, a nine-millimeter pistol fired six times, and the man who ordered the killing was the father of her four-year-old son. Who watched her routines long enough to turn a morning ritual into an execution?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Cecilia Monzón Pérez, the lawyer and activist who drove down Tlaxcala Street in Puebla on May 21, 2022, after spending the previous day demanding why her family violence complaint had not been processed. We detail the timeline from her social media post at 8:00 a.m. to the surveillance footage and the actors connected to her murder, and we ask how routine accountability failures became a fatal vulnerability.<br /><br />Person: Cecilia Monzón Pérez<br />Date: May 21, 2022<br />Location: Tlaxcala Street, Puebla, Mexico<br />Person: Javier López Zavala<br />Weapon: 9-millimeter pistol<br /><br />- At 8:00 a.m. Cecilia posted a quote and a good morning message before getting into her gray pickup truck.<br />- At approximately 9:00 a.m. six shots were fired; Cecilia died at the scene on Tlaxcala Street.<br />- Javier López Zavala is the father of Cecilia's four-year-old son and the man who ordered the killing.<br />- Surveillance cameras recorded a motorcycle following Cecilia’s pickup at a measured distance before the shooting.<br />- Two men on the motorcycle were identified as driver Jair Mauricio Domínguez and shooter Silvestre Vargas Ramírez.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879192</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:40 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879192/0681.mp3" length="28104257" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Posted Justice at 8AM - Killed an Hour Later on Tlaxcala Street&#13;
&#13;
Her Saturday morning post quoted a Uruguayan legal scholar and wished followers a good morning - sixty minutes later she was dead on Tlaxcala Street. A motorcycle trailed her at a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Posted Justice at 8AM - Killed an Hour Later on Tlaxcala Street<br /><br />Her Saturday morning post quoted a Uruguayan legal scholar and wished followers a good morning - sixty minutes later she was dead on Tlaxcala Street. A motorcycle trailed her at a measured distance, a nine-millimeter pistol fired six times, and the man who ordered the killing was the father of her four-year-old son. Who watched her routines long enough to turn a morning ritual into an execution?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Cecilia Monzón Pérez, the lawyer and activist who drove down Tlaxcala Street in Puebla on May 21, 2022, after spending the previous day demanding why her family violence complaint had not been processed. We detail the timeline from her social media post at 8:00 a.m. to the surveillance footage and the actors connected to her murder, and we ask how routine accountability failures became a fatal vulnerability.<br /><br />Person: Cecilia Monzón Pérez<br />Date: May 21, 2022<br />Location: Tlaxcala Street, Puebla, Mexico<br />Person: Javier López Zavala<br />Weapon: 9-millimeter pistol<br /><br />- At 8:00 a.m. Cecilia posted a quote and a good morning message before getting into her gray pickup truck.<br />- At approximately 9:00 a.m. six shots were fired; Cecilia died at the scene on Tlaxcala Street.<br />- Javier López Zavala is the father of Cecilia's four-year-old son and the man who ordered the killing.<br />- Surveillance cameras recorded a motorcycle following Cecilia’s pickup at a measured distance before the shooting.<br />- Two men on the motorcycle were identified as driver Jair Mauricio Domínguez and shooter Silvestre Vargas Ramírez.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1757</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Went In For Five Procedures - Never Came Home Again</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-went-in-for-five-procedures-never-came-home-again--72879191</link><description><![CDATA[She Went In For Five Procedures - Never Came Home Again<br /><br />The morning light, a two-year-old daughter at home, and five cosmetic procedures paid in full: a routine elective surgery that ended in a corpse. A surgeon who promoted himself on social media, rented clinic spaces without hospital infrastructure, and a pattern of complaints and deaths behind glossy before-and-after photos - how did routine aesthetic surgery become lethal, and who was held accountable?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline and testimony from the day Hillary Yuleni Heredia Velasco entered a Mexico City clinic through the trial that followed, tracing the clinic setup, the surgeon's practices, earlier patient deaths, and the family’s search for answers. What failures in care and regulation allowed a healthy twenty-seven-year-old mother to die after five procedures?<br /><br />Person: Hillary Yuleni Heredia Velasco<br />Date: May 24, 2021<br />Person: Melisa Rodríguez Rocha<br />Surgeon: Eduardo Gómez Casarrubias<br />Cause: absence of anticoagulants leading to blood clots (confirmed in 2024 trial)<br /><br />- Hillary was 27 years old and had a two-year-old daughter at home when she went into surgery.<br />- She paid for five procedures: breast implants, abdominoplasty, liposculpture, fat transfer to the gluteus, and rhinoplasty.<br />- The surgery lasted more than four hours and the rhinoplasty was not performed.<br />- Hillary convulsed and died before midnight on the night of May 24, 2021; the surgeon was absent during the emergency.<br />- Nine months earlier, 38-year-old Melisa Rodríguez Rocha died in the same clinic under the same surgeon.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879191</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:36 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879191/0680.mp3" length="31383983" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Went In For Five Procedures - Never Came Home Again&#13;
&#13;
The morning light, a two-year-old daughter at home, and five cosmetic procedures paid in full: a routine elective surgery that ended in a corpse. A surgeon who promoted himself on social...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Went In For Five Procedures - Never Came Home Again<br /><br />The morning light, a two-year-old daughter at home, and five cosmetic procedures paid in full: a routine elective surgery that ended in a corpse. A surgeon who promoted himself on social media, rented clinic spaces without hospital infrastructure, and a pattern of complaints and deaths behind glossy before-and-after photos - how did routine aesthetic surgery become lethal, and who was held accountable?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline and testimony from the day Hillary Yuleni Heredia Velasco entered a Mexico City clinic through the trial that followed, tracing the clinic setup, the surgeon's practices, earlier patient deaths, and the family’s search for answers. What failures in care and regulation allowed a healthy twenty-seven-year-old mother to die after five procedures?<br /><br />Person: Hillary Yuleni Heredia Velasco<br />Date: May 24, 2021<br />Person: Melisa Rodríguez Rocha<br />Surgeon: Eduardo Gómez Casarrubias<br />Cause: absence of anticoagulants leading to blood clots (confirmed in 2024 trial)<br /><br />- Hillary was 27 years old and had a two-year-old daughter at home when she went into surgery.<br />- She paid for five procedures: breast implants, abdominoplasty, liposculpture, fat transfer to the gluteus, and rhinoplasty.<br />- The surgery lasted more than four hours and the rhinoplasty was not performed.<br />- Hillary convulsed and died before midnight on the night of May 24, 2021; the surgeon was absent during the emergency.<br />- Nine months earlier, 38-year-old Melisa Rodríguez Rocha died in the same clinic under the same surgeon.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1962</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Calm Last Text: How Kos Hid a Killer Among Us</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-calm-last-text-how-kos-hid-a-killer-among-us--72879190</link><description><![CDATA[The Calm Last Text: How Kos Hid a Killer Among Us<br /><br />A casual message-"Everything was fine. Don't come."-sent from Anastasia Rubinska's phone silenced a boyfriend and began a year-and-a-half long legal mystery. She was 27, vanished after getting on a motorcycle outside a minimarket on Kos, and her body was found days later hidden under branches; who sent that calm last text?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the night of June 12, 2023 through the discovery on June 17 and the Greek court verdict in December 2024, following the people, places, and messages that drove the case. What does the timing of the texts, the minimarket witness, and the way her body was moved tell us about what happened?<br /><br />Person: Anastasia Patricia Rubinska<br />Date: June 12, 2023<br />Location: Kos, Greece<br />Event: Body found June 17, 2023; Greek court verdict December 2024<br />Age: 27<br /><br />- Anastasia sent a message at 10:30 PM saying she had had too much to drink.<br />- At 11:30 PM she sent her location with a message saying she was scared.<br />- A second message sent afterward read: "Everything was fine. Don't come."<br />- A minimarket employee witnessed five men approach her and saw her get on a motorcycle.<br />- Volunteers found her body under a low tree on June 17, wrapped in a white sheet with a black plastic bag covering part of her.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879190</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879190/0679.mp3" length="28123065" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Calm Last Text: How Kos Hid a Killer Among Us&#13;
&#13;
A casual message-"Everything was fine. Don't come."-sent from Anastasia Rubinska's phone silenced a boyfriend and began a year-and-a-half long legal mystery. She was 27, vanished after getting on a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Calm Last Text: How Kos Hid a Killer Among Us<br /><br />A casual message-"Everything was fine. Don't come."-sent from Anastasia Rubinska's phone silenced a boyfriend and began a year-and-a-half long legal mystery. She was 27, vanished after getting on a motorcycle outside a minimarket on Kos, and her body was found days later hidden under branches; who sent that calm last text?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the night of June 12, 2023 through the discovery on June 17 and the Greek court verdict in December 2024, following the people, places, and messages that drove the case. What does the timing of the texts, the minimarket witness, and the way her body was moved tell us about what happened?<br /><br />Person: Anastasia Patricia Rubinska<br />Date: June 12, 2023<br />Location: Kos, Greece<br />Event: Body found June 17, 2023; Greek court verdict December 2024<br />Age: 27<br /><br />- Anastasia sent a message at 10:30 PM saying she had had too much to drink.<br />- At 11:30 PM she sent her location with a message saying she was scared.<br />- A second message sent afterward read: "Everything was fine. Don't come."<br />- A minimarket employee witnessed five men approach her and saw her get on a motorcycle.<br />- Volunteers found her body under a low tree on June 17, wrapped in a white sheet with a black plastic bag covering part of her.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1758</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Last Smile on Camera: What Nicolás Took From Narumi</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-last-smile-on-camera-what-nicolas-took-from-narumi--72879189</link><description><![CDATA[The Last Smile on Camera: What Nicolás Took From Narumi<br /><br />The last confirmed image of Narumi Kurosaki alive is a grainy security photo of her smiling in a university residence hall at 22:38 on December 4, 2016 - and the man beside her would be the only person to say what happened next. French investigators found a room that looked unnaturally tidy, a rental car returned caked in mud on December 7, and messages that continued after she vanished; what did that final smile mean, and who holds the missing pieces?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Narumi’s arrival in France on a scholarship to the night she disappeared, laying out the evidence, recorded movements, and communications that shaped the investigation and the unanswered questions that remain.<br /><br />Person: Narumi Kurosaki<br />Date: December 4-5, 2016<br />Location: university residence hall in eastern France<br />Person: Nicolás Humberto Cepeda Contreras<br />Event: rental car returned caked in mud on December 7, 2016<br /><br />- Narumi was 21 years old when she was last seen on a security camera at 22:38 on December 4, 2016.<br />- Nearly 1,000 messages were exchanged between Narumi and Nicolás in autumn 2016 and were analyzed by French authorities.<br />- A security camera captured Narumi and Nicolás leaving a restaurant together at 21:57 on December 4, 2016, the restaurant being 20 kilometers from her residence.<br />- Around 03:20 on the night of December 4-5, approximately 15 students heard screams and a heavy thud in the residence hall corridor; no one called police.<br />- Nicolás flew into Geneva in late November 2016 with a stopover in Madrid, rented a car, and a Chilean bank card was used to pay the dinner bill that proved his presence in France.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879189</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879189/0678.mp3" length="27955882" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Last Smile on Camera: What Nicolás Took From Narumi&#13;
&#13;
The last confirmed image of Narumi Kurosaki alive is a grainy security photo of her smiling in a university residence hall at 22:38 on December 4, 2016 - and the man beside her would be the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Last Smile on Camera: What Nicolás Took From Narumi<br /><br />The last confirmed image of Narumi Kurosaki alive is a grainy security photo of her smiling in a university residence hall at 22:38 on December 4, 2016 - and the man beside her would be the only person to say what happened next. French investigators found a room that looked unnaturally tidy, a rental car returned caked in mud on December 7, and messages that continued after she vanished; what did that final smile mean, and who holds the missing pieces?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Narumi’s arrival in France on a scholarship to the night she disappeared, laying out the evidence, recorded movements, and communications that shaped the investigation and the unanswered questions that remain.<br /><br />Person: Narumi Kurosaki<br />Date: December 4-5, 2016<br />Location: university residence hall in eastern France<br />Person: Nicolás Humberto Cepeda Contreras<br />Event: rental car returned caked in mud on December 7, 2016<br /><br />- Narumi was 21 years old when she was last seen on a security camera at 22:38 on December 4, 2016.<br />- Nearly 1,000 messages were exchanged between Narumi and Nicolás in autumn 2016 and were analyzed by French authorities.<br />- A security camera captured Narumi and Nicolás leaving a restaurant together at 21:57 on December 4, 2016, the restaurant being 20 kilometers from her residence.<br />- Around 03:20 on the night of December 4-5, approximately 15 students heard screams and a heavy thud in the residence hall corridor; no one called police.<br />- Nicolás flew into Geneva in late November 2016 with a stopover in Madrid, rented a car, and a Chilean bank card was used to pay the dinner bill that proved his presence in France.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1748</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Refrigerator on the Porch: How Nadia Vanished in Plain Sight</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-refrigerator-on-the-porch-how-nadia-vanished-in-plain-sight--72879186</link><description><![CDATA[The Refrigerator on the Porch: How Nadia Vanished in Plain Sight<br /><br />A visible refrigerator on a front patio hid the remains of twenty-one-year-old Nadia Janette Peraza Espinoza for more than a month while neighbors passed by and no one opened it. Her partner sent messages from her phone to family and friends pretending she was fine-so how did routine, proximity, and hesitation allow a disappearance to go unnoticed?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the night of February 22 to the morning of February 23, 2024, in Heredia, Costa Rica, and trace the preceding signs that were missed or dismissed. What moments before that night could have stopped this from happening, and why were they not acted upon?<br /><br />Person: Nadia Janette Peraza Espinoza<br />Date last seen: February 22-23, 2024<br />Location: Heredia, Costa Rica<br />Age: 21<br />Family reported missing: March 1, 2024<br /><br />- Nadia was born on July 14, 2002, in Heredia.<br />- Her daughter was two years old at the time Nadia disappeared.<br />- Nadia arrived at her mother's house on February 20, 2024, around 10 a.m.; that was the last time her mother saw her alive.<br />- Nadia filed a protective order against Jeremy in 2022 after a physical assault.<br />- On April 7, 2024, forty-five days after Nadia was last seen, a security camera at the apartment building captured Jeremy leaving.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879186</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879186/0677.mp3" length="26606291" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Refrigerator on the Porch: How Nadia Vanished in Plain Sight&#13;
&#13;
A visible refrigerator on a front patio hid the remains of twenty-one-year-old Nadia Janette Peraza Espinoza for more than a month while neighbors passed by and no one opened it. Her...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Refrigerator on the Porch: How Nadia Vanished in Plain Sight<br /><br />A visible refrigerator on a front patio hid the remains of twenty-one-year-old Nadia Janette Peraza Espinoza for more than a month while neighbors passed by and no one opened it. Her partner sent messages from her phone to family and friends pretending she was fine-so how did routine, proximity, and hesitation allow a disappearance to go unnoticed?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the night of February 22 to the morning of February 23, 2024, in Heredia, Costa Rica, and trace the preceding signs that were missed or dismissed. What moments before that night could have stopped this from happening, and why were they not acted upon?<br /><br />Person: Nadia Janette Peraza Espinoza<br />Date last seen: February 22-23, 2024<br />Location: Heredia, Costa Rica<br />Age: 21<br />Family reported missing: March 1, 2024<br /><br />- Nadia was born on July 14, 2002, in Heredia.<br />- Her daughter was two years old at the time Nadia disappeared.<br />- Nadia arrived at her mother's house on February 20, 2024, around 10 a.m.; that was the last time her mother saw her alive.<br />- Nadia filed a protective order against Jeremy in 2022 after a physical assault.<br />- On April 7, 2024, forty-five days after Nadia was last seen, a security camera at the apartment building captured Jeremy leaving.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1663</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Stabbed Him, Filmed It, Went Home - The Cold Truth</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-stabbed-him-filmed-it-went-home-the-cold-truth--72879185</link><description><![CDATA[She Stabbed Him, Filmed It, Went Home - The Cold Truth<br /><br />The video was four minutes long and she published it while he bled out - a man died shortly after midnight, she was detained the same night, and three years later a court gave eight years for simple homicide. How did a restraining order, three prior complaints, and recorded arrivals at 22:15 all lead to a verdict that still leaves questions about what really happened that night?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the documented facts from the case in Río Grande, Argentina, tracing the recorded arrival, the video admission, the medical outcome, and the legal outcome to ask whether the official record captures the whole story.<br /><br />Person: Alexis Damián Baciochi<br />Person: Florencia Eliana Mancilla<br />Date: December 19, 2022<br />Location: Río Grande, Tierra del Fuego<br />Status: Sentenced to eight years for simple homicide<br /><br />- The video recorded by Florencia lasted four minutes and was published while the victim was still bleeding.<br />- Security cameras captured Florencia arriving at Alexis’s building at 22:15 and entering through the front gate.<br />- Alexis was taken to the hospital and died shortly after midnight on December 19, 2022.<br />- Florencia had three prior violations of a restraining order and Alexis filed three formal complaints between 2018 and 2019.<br />- The psychiatric evaluation found Florencia had borderline personality disorder but was not in a psychotic episode the night of the killing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879185</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:21 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879185/0676.mp3" length="26855813" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Stabbed Him, Filmed It, Went Home - The Cold Truth&#13;
&#13;
The video was four minutes long and she published it while he bled out - a man died shortly after midnight, she was detained the same night, and three years later a court gave eight years for...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Stabbed Him, Filmed It, Went Home - The Cold Truth<br /><br />The video was four minutes long and she published it while he bled out - a man died shortly after midnight, she was detained the same night, and three years later a court gave eight years for simple homicide. How did a restraining order, three prior complaints, and recorded arrivals at 22:15 all lead to a verdict that still leaves questions about what really happened that night?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the documented facts from the case in Río Grande, Argentina, tracing the recorded arrival, the video admission, the medical outcome, and the legal outcome to ask whether the official record captures the whole story.<br /><br />Person: Alexis Damián Baciochi<br />Person: Florencia Eliana Mancilla<br />Date: December 19, 2022<br />Location: Río Grande, Tierra del Fuego<br />Status: Sentenced to eight years for simple homicide<br /><br />- The video recorded by Florencia lasted four minutes and was published while the victim was still bleeding.<br />- Security cameras captured Florencia arriving at Alexis’s building at 22:15 and entering through the front gate.<br />- Alexis was taken to the hospital and died shortly after midnight on December 19, 2022.<br />- Florencia had three prior violations of a restraining order and Alexis filed three formal complaints between 2018 and 2019.<br />- The psychiatric evaluation found Florencia had borderline personality disorder but was not in a psychotic episode the night of the killing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1679</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The White Dress That Never Came Home: Alabama's Vanished Family Mystery</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-white-dress-that-never-came-home-alabama-s-vanished-family-mystery--72879183</link><description><![CDATA[The White Dress That Never Came Home: Alabama's Vanished Family Mystery<br /><br />A seventeen-year-old picked a white baptism dress on the last Friday of January 2026 and never wore it; three family members were last seen alive before eight that night and a four-hour span of security footage simply vanishes. What happened in the forty-minute window where everything was still ordinary, and why was the main mattress missing from the home?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the recorded facts of the case as reported: who lived in the house, what neighbors saw that evening, and the items found and missing when the home was entered the next morning. Could the missing mattress and the unexplained gap in footage be the key to what happened?<br /><br />Person: Aurelia Chock Kak<br />Person: Niurka Sueta Chock<br />Person: Anthony García Chock<br />Date: January 30-31, 2026<br />Location: Alabama<br /><br />- Niurka picked a white dress for a baptism on Friday, January 30, 2026, intended to be worn the following Sunday.<br />- Neighbors Maurice and Kim visited around 7:30 p.m.; they left before 8:00 p.m., the last outside confirmation all three were alive.<br />- Security cameras recorded the property until approximately 8:00 p.m.; four hours of footage covering the critical window are absent.<br />- When neighbors entered the house the next morning, they found blood on the sofa, on the floor, and on the main bedroom bed.<br />- The main bedroom mattress was missing from the home when investigators catalogued the scene.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879183</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879183/0675.mp3" length="28225047" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The White Dress That Never Came Home: Alabama's Vanished Family Mystery&#13;
&#13;
A seventeen-year-old picked a white baptism dress on the last Friday of January 2026 and never wore it; three family members were last seen alive before eight that night and a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The White Dress That Never Came Home: Alabama's Vanished Family Mystery<br /><br />A seventeen-year-old picked a white baptism dress on the last Friday of January 2026 and never wore it; three family members were last seen alive before eight that night and a four-hour span of security footage simply vanishes. What happened in the forty-minute window where everything was still ordinary, and why was the main mattress missing from the home?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the recorded facts of the case as reported: who lived in the house, what neighbors saw that evening, and the items found and missing when the home was entered the next morning. Could the missing mattress and the unexplained gap in footage be the key to what happened?<br /><br />Person: Aurelia Chock Kak<br />Person: Niurka Sueta Chock<br />Person: Anthony García Chock<br />Date: January 30-31, 2026<br />Location: Alabama<br /><br />- Niurka picked a white dress for a baptism on Friday, January 30, 2026, intended to be worn the following Sunday.<br />- Neighbors Maurice and Kim visited around 7:30 p.m.; they left before 8:00 p.m., the last outside confirmation all three were alive.<br />- Security cameras recorded the property until approximately 8:00 p.m.; four hours of footage covering the critical window are absent.<br />- When neighbors entered the house the next morning, they found blood on the sofa, on the floor, and on the main bedroom bed.<br />- The main bedroom mattress was missing from the home when investigators catalogued the scene.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1765</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Day She Called About a Headache - Then Vanished</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-day-she-called-about-a-headache-then-vanished--72879181</link><description><![CDATA[The Day She Called About a Headache - Then Vanished<br /><br />The ordinary details of a tired voice and a headache became the loudest proof that something had gone wrong: Claudia called at 11:15 a.m. on Wednesday, November 26, 2025, mentioned a power outage, a painful neck, and a package to be picked up - and was never heard from again. How does a municipal financial director disappear from an apartment with no signs of struggle while both her truck and motorcycle vanish?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the timeline of Claudia Pamela Rivas’s last known day and the immediate weeks that followed, following calls, missing vehicles, and the details found inside her apartment to ask whether this was an untraceable departure or something more sinister. What did investigators learn from the two keys and the items that were gone?<br /><br />Person: Claudia Pamela Rivas<br />Date: November 26, 2025<br />Age: 30<br />Occupation: Financial director of a municipal government<br />Last call time: 11:15 a.m.<br /><br />- Claudia told family the power was out and that her neck hurt during a phone call at 11:15 a.m. on Wednesday, November 26, 2025.<br />- Her apartment door showed no signs of forced entry and interior belongings appeared undisturbed when coworkers checked on Thursday.<br />- Both her truck and her motorcycle were missing from where they were normally kept by the time the apartment was checked.<br />- Investigators bagged and logged two motorcycle keys found in the apartment, one with a black keychain stamped "Pulsar."<br />- The formal missing persons report was filed on the night of Thursday, November 28, 2025.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879181</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879181/0674.mp3" length="24991715" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Day She Called About a Headache - Then Vanished&#13;
&#13;
The ordinary details of a tired voice and a headache became the loudest proof that something had gone wrong: Claudia called at 11:15 a.m. on Wednesday, November 26, 2025, mentioned a power outage,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Day She Called About a Headache - Then Vanished<br /><br />The ordinary details of a tired voice and a headache became the loudest proof that something had gone wrong: Claudia called at 11:15 a.m. on Wednesday, November 26, 2025, mentioned a power outage, a painful neck, and a package to be picked up - and was never heard from again. How does a municipal financial director disappear from an apartment with no signs of struggle while both her truck and motorcycle vanish?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the timeline of Claudia Pamela Rivas’s last known day and the immediate weeks that followed, following calls, missing vehicles, and the details found inside her apartment to ask whether this was an untraceable departure or something more sinister. What did investigators learn from the two keys and the items that were gone?<br /><br />Person: Claudia Pamela Rivas<br />Date: November 26, 2025<br />Age: 30<br />Occupation: Financial director of a municipal government<br />Last call time: 11:15 a.m.<br /><br />- Claudia told family the power was out and that her neck hurt during a phone call at 11:15 a.m. on Wednesday, November 26, 2025.<br />- Her apartment door showed no signs of forced entry and interior belongings appeared undisturbed when coworkers checked on Thursday.<br />- Both her truck and her motorcycle were missing from where they were normally kept by the time the apartment was checked.<br />- Investigators bagged and logged two motorcycle keys found in the apartment, one with a black keychain stamped "Pulsar."<br />- The formal missing persons report was filed on the night of Thursday, November 28, 2025.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1562</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Was Slain Before the Flames: The Temuco Housefire Mystery</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-was-slain-before-the-flames-the-temuco-housefire-mystery--72879180</link><description><![CDATA[She Was Slain Before the Flames: The Temuco Housefire Mystery<br /><br />A scream at 3:00 a.m. on December 29, 2016 cut through San Antonio de Temuco and a house went up in orange light - but the mother found inside had two stab wounds and was already dead before the first flame. Four people died that night: a 28-year-old mother and her three sons; one son survived with burns to 90% of his body. Who turned a homicide into an apparent house fire?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the moment neighbors arrived at the burning home through the delayed forensic report that rewrote the case, asking how early investigative choices and missing evidence changed everything. How did a fire become the official story when the medical examiner found wounds and blood inconsistent with death by flames?<br /><br />Person: Ginny Sandoval Reyes<br />Date: December 29, 2016<br />Location: San Antonio de Temuco<br />Age: 28<br />Injuries: Two stab wounds; abrasions; bloodstained clothing<br /><br />- Four people died in the incident: Ginny and her three sons.<br />- Ginny had two puncture wounds: one to the chest and one to the throat, per the forensic report.<br />- Ignacio, the oldest son, survived but suffered burns to 90% of his body.<br />- Bodies and clothing were removed from the scene before proper documentation and inventory were completed.<br />- Alda Reyes Briones, Ginny’s mother, was working a night shift and arrived to find the perimeter cut and officers treating the scene as a fire rather than a homicide.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879180</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879180/0673.mp3" length="24136988" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Was Slain Before the Flames: The Temuco Housefire Mystery&#13;
&#13;
A scream at 3:00 a.m. on December 29, 2016 cut through San Antonio de Temuco and a house went up in orange light - but the mother found inside had two stab wounds and was already dead...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Was Slain Before the Flames: The Temuco Housefire Mystery<br /><br />A scream at 3:00 a.m. on December 29, 2016 cut through San Antonio de Temuco and a house went up in orange light - but the mother found inside had two stab wounds and was already dead before the first flame. Four people died that night: a 28-year-old mother and her three sons; one son survived with burns to 90% of his body. Who turned a homicide into an apparent house fire?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the moment neighbors arrived at the burning home through the delayed forensic report that rewrote the case, asking how early investigative choices and missing evidence changed everything. How did a fire become the official story when the medical examiner found wounds and blood inconsistent with death by flames?<br /><br />Person: Ginny Sandoval Reyes<br />Date: December 29, 2016<br />Location: San Antonio de Temuco<br />Age: 28<br />Injuries: Two stab wounds; abrasions; bloodstained clothing<br /><br />- Four people died in the incident: Ginny and her three sons.<br />- Ginny had two puncture wounds: one to the chest and one to the throat, per the forensic report.<br />- Ignacio, the oldest son, survived but suffered burns to 90% of his body.<br />- Bodies and clothing were removed from the scene before proper documentation and inventory were completed.<br />- Alda Reyes Briones, Ginny’s mother, was working a night shift and arrived to find the perimeter cut and officers treating the scene as a fire rather than a homicide.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1509</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Giraffe, The Lioness-and the Zanzibar Night No One Explains</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-giraffe-the-lioness-and-the-zanzibar-night-no-one-explains--72879179</link><description><![CDATA[The Giraffe, The Lioness-and the Zanzibar Night No One Explains<br /><br />A luxury safari turned into a vanished-narrative: a thirty-one-year-old influencer feeds a giraffe on April 5, posts a proposal by a tame lioness on April 3, and is dead six days later with no official cause released. What happened in that Zanzibar villa between a loud April 8 argument, a police call, and the last phone call to her mother that no document fully explains?<br /><br />In this episode, I lay out the timeline, the public posts, the resort intervention, and the unresolved official details to show where the story fractures - and why a single charging cable, a separate villa ten kilometers away, and an unreleased forensic report refuse to fit into any clear answer. Which of those small facts holds the key to what actually happened?<br /><br />Person: Ashley Robinson<br />Date: April 5, 2026 (birthday) and April 8-9, 2026 (incident and death)<br />Location: Zanzibar, luxury resort villa<br />Person: Joseph Isaac Macán (Joe), 45, crypto investment manager<br />Status: Forensic report exists but has not been released<br /><br />- Ashley Robinson was born April 5, 1995 and turned 31 on April 5, 2026.<br />- The public proposal beside a lioness occurred on April 3, 2026 and was posted by Ashley.<br />- On April 5, 2026 Ashley fed a giraffe from the palm of her hand and posted birthday images.<br />- On April 8, 2026 neighbors heard a loud argument; resort staff separated the couple and police were called.<br />- Joe was sent to a different villa roughly ten kilometers away on foot and had his passport confiscated by Tanzanian authorities.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879179</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879179/0672.mp3" length="25584799" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Giraffe, The Lioness-and the Zanzibar Night No One Explains&#13;
&#13;
A luxury safari turned into a vanished-narrative: a thirty-one-year-old influencer feeds a giraffe on April 5, posts a proposal by a tame lioness on April 3, and is dead six days later...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Giraffe, The Lioness-and the Zanzibar Night No One Explains<br /><br />A luxury safari turned into a vanished-narrative: a thirty-one-year-old influencer feeds a giraffe on April 5, posts a proposal by a tame lioness on April 3, and is dead six days later with no official cause released. What happened in that Zanzibar villa between a loud April 8 argument, a police call, and the last phone call to her mother that no document fully explains?<br /><br />In this episode, I lay out the timeline, the public posts, the resort intervention, and the unresolved official details to show where the story fractures - and why a single charging cable, a separate villa ten kilometers away, and an unreleased forensic report refuse to fit into any clear answer. Which of those small facts holds the key to what actually happened?<br /><br />Person: Ashley Robinson<br />Date: April 5, 2026 (birthday) and April 8-9, 2026 (incident and death)<br />Location: Zanzibar, luxury resort villa<br />Person: Joseph Isaac Macán (Joe), 45, crypto investment manager<br />Status: Forensic report exists but has not been released<br /><br />- Ashley Robinson was born April 5, 1995 and turned 31 on April 5, 2026.<br />- The public proposal beside a lioness occurred on April 3, 2026 and was posted by Ashley.<br />- On April 5, 2026 Ashley fed a giraffe from the palm of her hand and posted birthday images.<br />- On April 8, 2026 neighbors heard a loud argument; resort staff separated the couple and police were called.<br />- Joe was sent to a different villa roughly ten kilometers away on foot and had his passport confiscated by Tanzanian authorities.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1599</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Sent Her Location - Vanished Inside a Locked Building</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-sent-her-location-vanished-inside-a-locked-building--72879178</link><description><![CDATA[She Sent Her Location - Vanished Inside a Locked Building<br /><br />A 21-year-old sent her father a GPS pin three minutes after boarding a mototaxi and then walked into a high-security apartment building where staff say she never arrived. The external cameras show her entering shortly before 5 PM on April 15, 2026, but there is no footage of her leaving - so where did she go?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the last message Edit Guadalupe Valdés Saldíar sent to her family through the building's refusal to release interior footage, the private investigator's recovered exterior recordings, and the evidence found inside the building the next day; what those discoveries mean for who could have had access to Edit once she was inside is the central question.<br /><br />Person: Edit Guadalupe Valdés Saldíar<br />Date: April 15, 2026<br />Age: 21<br />Event: Sent GPS location then entered building; never seen leaving<br />Location: Apartment building with controlled access on a main avenue<br /><br />- Edit boarded a mototaxi around 4:00 PM and sent her father a GPS location minutes later.<br />- The meeting for the job interview was scheduled for 5:00 PM and Edit arrived on time, according to exterior footage.<br />- Building protocol required buzzing, direct communication with residents, a physical sign-in log, key cards for elevators, and authorized taxi entry.<br />- Security staff told Edit’s family her name was not in the entry log and the apartment number was not in the building’s official registry.<br />- External cameras show Edit entering the building shortly before 5:00 PM on April 15, 2026, with no recorded image of her leaving.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879178</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:53:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879178/0671.mp3" length="24031245" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Sent Her Location - Vanished Inside a Locked Building&#13;
&#13;
A 21-year-old sent her father a GPS pin three minutes after boarding a mototaxi and then walked into a high-security apartment building where staff say she never arrived. The external...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Sent Her Location - Vanished Inside a Locked Building<br /><br />A 21-year-old sent her father a GPS pin three minutes after boarding a mototaxi and then walked into a high-security apartment building where staff say she never arrived. The external cameras show her entering shortly before 5 PM on April 15, 2026, but there is no footage of her leaving - so where did she go?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the last message Edit Guadalupe Valdés Saldíar sent to her family through the building's refusal to release interior footage, the private investigator's recovered exterior recordings, and the evidence found inside the building the next day; what those discoveries mean for who could have had access to Edit once she was inside is the central question.<br /><br />Person: Edit Guadalupe Valdés Saldíar<br />Date: April 15, 2026<br />Age: 21<br />Event: Sent GPS location then entered building; never seen leaving<br />Location: Apartment building with controlled access on a main avenue<br /><br />- Edit boarded a mototaxi around 4:00 PM and sent her father a GPS location minutes later.<br />- The meeting for the job interview was scheduled for 5:00 PM and Edit arrived on time, according to exterior footage.<br />- Building protocol required buzzing, direct communication with residents, a physical sign-in log, key cards for elevators, and authorized taxi entry.<br />- Security staff told Edit’s family her name was not in the entry log and the apartment number was not in the building’s official registry.<br />- External cameras show Edit entering the building shortly before 5:00 PM on April 15, 2026, with no recorded image of her leaving.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1502</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Cooked for Wednesday - Then Vanished: The Last Call</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-cooked-for-wednesday-then-vanished-the-last-call--72879177</link><description><![CDATA[She Cooked for Wednesday - Then Vanished: The Last Call<br /><br />A routine call about a recipe turned into the last conversation a mother ever had with her daughter: Yunasis "Juni" Merlo asked to cook a dish on Wednesday and never made it to that day. She went live that night, had about 9,000 followers, and by morning a man close to her had a story that would unravel under investigation-what really happened between that live stream and the missing person report filed two days later?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from Juni's March 30 call to her family, through the March 31 breakfast when her partner answered her phone, to the April 2 missing persons report, and follow the contradictions that emerged as investigators gathered evidence. How did ordinary details-a planned meal, a live video, a phone left at home-become the threads that point in one unavoidable direction?<br /><br />Person: Yunasis Adel Merlo Espinoza<br />Age: 29<br />Event: Live social media stream on March 30 at 6:30 p.m.<br />Date: Missing persons report filed April 2<br />Person: Gustavo Adolfo Ramírez Calvo<br /><br />- Juni told her mother she would cook a specific meal on Wednesday during a phone call on March 30, 2026.<br />- She went live on social media at 6:30 p.m. on March 30, 2026, and spoke to her audience.<br />- Juni had approximately 9,000 followers on her social platform where she posted about relationship conflict and aggression.<br />- On the morning of March 31, 2026, the household phone was answered by Gustavo, who said Juni had gone to the beach and left her phone at home.<br />- A formal missing persons report for Juni was filed by her family on April 2, 2026.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879177</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:59 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879177/0670.mp3" length="37944270" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Cooked for Wednesday - Then Vanished: The Last Call&#13;
&#13;
A routine call about a recipe turned into the last conversation a mother ever had with her daughter: Yunasis "Juni" Merlo asked to cook a dish on Wednesday and never made it to that day. She...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Cooked for Wednesday - Then Vanished: The Last Call<br /><br />A routine call about a recipe turned into the last conversation a mother ever had with her daughter: Yunasis "Juni" Merlo asked to cook a dish on Wednesday and never made it to that day. She went live that night, had about 9,000 followers, and by morning a man close to her had a story that would unravel under investigation-what really happened between that live stream and the missing person report filed two days later?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from Juni's March 30 call to her family, through the March 31 breakfast when her partner answered her phone, to the April 2 missing persons report, and follow the contradictions that emerged as investigators gathered evidence. How did ordinary details-a planned meal, a live video, a phone left at home-become the threads that point in one unavoidable direction?<br /><br />Person: Yunasis Adel Merlo Espinoza<br />Age: 29<br />Event: Live social media stream on March 30 at 6:30 p.m.<br />Date: Missing persons report filed April 2<br />Person: Gustavo Adolfo Ramírez Calvo<br /><br />- Juni told her mother she would cook a specific meal on Wednesday during a phone call on March 30, 2026.<br />- She went live on social media at 6:30 p.m. on March 30, 2026, and spoke to her audience.<br />- Juni had approximately 9,000 followers on her social platform where she posted about relationship conflict and aggression.<br />- On the morning of March 31, 2026, the household phone was answered by Gustavo, who said Juni had gone to the beach and left her phone at home.<br />- A formal missing persons report for Juni was filed by her family on April 2, 2026.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2372</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Laughed Hours Before: The Family That Buried Karen Alive</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-laughed-hours-before-the-family-that-buried-karen-alive--72879176</link><description><![CDATA[She Laughed Hours Before: The Family That Buried Karen Alive<br /><br />Her last call was laughter - and six days later her body was found in a wooded area outside Mexico City. Surveillance footage shows her entering a family home on May 18, 2022, and never leaving; twelve people in that house kept silent while decomposition advanced enough that only DNA could confirm her identity. Who carried the bag into a trunk that night, and why did an entire household move as if nothing had happened?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline and the evidence surrounding Karen Itzel Rodríguez Barrales’s disappearance and death, from the thesis seminar where she celebrated an excellent grade to the surveillance tapes that contradict the story told to her mother. What do the camera images, phone records, and family statements reveal about how she died and who knew?<br /><br />Person: Karen Itzel Rodríguez Barrales<br />Date: May 13, 2022 (last call); May 31, 2022 (body found)<br />Location: wooded area on the outskirts of Mexico City; Galicia family home (surveillance)<br />Case: disappearance followed by homicide confirmed by DNA<br />Cause: severe blow to the head preceded by a brutal beating<br /><br />- Karen called her mother laughing on May 13, 2022, after receiving the highest possible grade in her thesis seminar.<br />- Surveillance cameras recorded Karen entering the Galicia family home on May 18, 2022, with no footage of her leaving.<br />- Karen’s body was discovered on May 31, 2022, with decomposition preventing visual ID and identification made by DNA comparison with family samples.<br />- Investigators determined she suffered a severe blow to the head after a brutal beating and had been killed inside a house where at least five other people were present.<br />- Surveillance footage shows José Luis leaving the house on the night of May 18, returning about two hours later, and later loading a heavy bag into a car trunk driven by his father.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879176</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879176/0669.mp3" length="23821429" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Laughed Hours Before: The Family That Buried Karen Alive&#13;
&#13;
Her last call was laughter - and six days later her body was found in a wooded area outside Mexico City. Surveillance footage shows her entering a family home on May 18, 2022, and never...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Laughed Hours Before: The Family That Buried Karen Alive<br /><br />Her last call was laughter - and six days later her body was found in a wooded area outside Mexico City. Surveillance footage shows her entering a family home on May 18, 2022, and never leaving; twelve people in that house kept silent while decomposition advanced enough that only DNA could confirm her identity. Who carried the bag into a trunk that night, and why did an entire household move as if nothing had happened?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline and the evidence surrounding Karen Itzel Rodríguez Barrales’s disappearance and death, from the thesis seminar where she celebrated an excellent grade to the surveillance tapes that contradict the story told to her mother. What do the camera images, phone records, and family statements reveal about how she died and who knew?<br /><br />Person: Karen Itzel Rodríguez Barrales<br />Date: May 13, 2022 (last call); May 31, 2022 (body found)<br />Location: wooded area on the outskirts of Mexico City; Galicia family home (surveillance)<br />Case: disappearance followed by homicide confirmed by DNA<br />Cause: severe blow to the head preceded by a brutal beating<br /><br />- Karen called her mother laughing on May 13, 2022, after receiving the highest possible grade in her thesis seminar.<br />- Surveillance cameras recorded Karen entering the Galicia family home on May 18, 2022, with no footage of her leaving.<br />- Karen’s body was discovered on May 31, 2022, with decomposition preventing visual ID and identification made by DNA comparison with family samples.<br />- Investigators determined she suffered a severe blow to the head after a brutal beating and had been killed inside a house where at least five other people were present.<br />- Surveillance footage shows José Luis leaving the house on the night of May 18, returning about two hours later, and later loading a heavy bag into a car trunk driven by his father.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1489</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Came For the Baby: 60 Seconds of Silence on Camera</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-came-for-the-baby-60-seconds-of-silence-on-camera--72879171</link><description><![CDATA[She Came For the Baby: 60 Seconds of Silence on Camera<br /><br />The morning call that always arrived never reached Reina - and a security camera captured what followed: a woman walking with her hands in her pockets, two dogs circling in sudden agitation, a single shot, then a scream and rapid gunfire. Why did a routine family morning in a high-security Mexico City apartment end in twelve impact wounds and seven shell casings?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events recorded on the building’s interior camera, the people present that morning, and the medical and physical evidence left behind, asking what the footage can - and cannot - explain about motive, timing, and intent.<br /><br />Person: Carolina Flores Gómez<br />Date: April 15<br />Location: Mexico City apartment in a high-income district<br />Person: Alejandro Sánchez Herrera<br />Person: Erika María Herrera<br />Event: Security camera recording of shooting<br /><br />- Carolina was twenty-six years old and eight months into motherhood on April 15.<br />- Carolina had called her mother Reina every morning, sometimes two or three times before noon; no call arrived that last morning.<br />- The medical examiner recorded twelve impact wounds on Carolina: six to the head and six to the chest.<br />- Investigators recovered seven shell casings and four deformed bullets at the scene.<br />- Surveillance footage shows Erika walking closely behind Carolina with hands in her pockets until they left the camera frame, followed seconds later by a single shot, a scream, then multiple shots.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879171</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:50 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879171/0668.mp3" length="26981201" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Came For the Baby: 60 Seconds of Silence on Camera&#13;
&#13;
The morning call that always arrived never reached Reina - and a security camera captured what followed: a woman walking with her hands in her pockets, two dogs circling in sudden agitation, a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Came For the Baby: 60 Seconds of Silence on Camera<br /><br />The morning call that always arrived never reached Reina - and a security camera captured what followed: a woman walking with her hands in her pockets, two dogs circling in sudden agitation, a single shot, then a scream and rapid gunfire. Why did a routine family morning in a high-security Mexico City apartment end in twelve impact wounds and seven shell casings?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events recorded on the building’s interior camera, the people present that morning, and the medical and physical evidence left behind, asking what the footage can - and cannot - explain about motive, timing, and intent.<br /><br />Person: Carolina Flores Gómez<br />Date: April 15<br />Location: Mexico City apartment in a high-income district<br />Person: Alejandro Sánchez Herrera<br />Person: Erika María Herrera<br />Event: Security camera recording of shooting<br /><br />- Carolina was twenty-six years old and eight months into motherhood on April 15.<br />- Carolina had called her mother Reina every morning, sometimes two or three times before noon; no call arrived that last morning.<br />- The medical examiner recorded twelve impact wounds on Carolina: six to the head and six to the chest.<br />- Investigators recovered seven shell casings and four deformed bullets at the scene.<br />- Surveillance footage shows Erika walking closely behind Carolina with hands in her pockets until they left the camera frame, followed seconds later by a single shot, a scream, then multiple shots.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1687</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Bought the Molotov: Why a Stranger Set a Young Woman on Fire</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-bought-the-molotov-why-a-stranger-set-a-young-woman-on-fire--72879170</link><description><![CDATA[She Bought the Molotov: Why a Stranger Set a Young Woman on Fire<br /><br />A routine purchase turned into a lethal act: a woman bought a bottle of rubbing alcohol, paid calmly with her phone, and fifty seconds later poured it over a young shopkeeper and set her on fire. The footage shows a thirty-second small‑town exchange two hours earlier that a jealous observer later said explained everything - but can thirty seconds of polite talk really lead to arson and attempted murder?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the documented timeline of that Saturday afternoon and the people caught in its wake, using recorded footage, witness statements, and the town’s details to map what happened and why one brief interaction became the catalyst for violence. What in those ordinary moments turned a stranger into an attacker?<br /><br />Date: April 11, 2026<br />Location: Delfinópolis, Minas Gerais<br />Person: Iris Gabrieli Cándida Paulino<br />Age: 24<br />Event: Bottle of rubbing alcohol poured and set on fire<br /><br />- The attacker paid for the bottle of rubbing alcohol with her phone in a transaction that took less than one minute.<br />- Fifty seconds after leaving the register with the bottle, the attacker emptied it over Iris and set her on fire.<br />- Iris had finished a university degree the previous year and was working the register in her family’s shop.<br />- Two hours before the attack, a young man paid at the register and spoke with Iris for approximately thirty seconds about a show.<br />- Surveillance cameras inside the shop recorded the entire sequence of events, providing a complete footage timeline.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879170</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:46 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879170/0667.mp3" length="25121282" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Bought the Molotov: Why a Stranger Set a Young Woman on Fire&#13;
&#13;
A routine purchase turned into a lethal act: a woman bought a bottle of rubbing alcohol, paid calmly with her phone, and fifty seconds later poured it over a young shopkeeper and set...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Bought the Molotov: Why a Stranger Set a Young Woman on Fire<br /><br />A routine purchase turned into a lethal act: a woman bought a bottle of rubbing alcohol, paid calmly with her phone, and fifty seconds later poured it over a young shopkeeper and set her on fire. The footage shows a thirty-second small‑town exchange two hours earlier that a jealous observer later said explained everything - but can thirty seconds of polite talk really lead to arson and attempted murder?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the documented timeline of that Saturday afternoon and the people caught in its wake, using recorded footage, witness statements, and the town’s details to map what happened and why one brief interaction became the catalyst for violence. What in those ordinary moments turned a stranger into an attacker?<br /><br />Date: April 11, 2026<br />Location: Delfinópolis, Minas Gerais<br />Person: Iris Gabrieli Cándida Paulino<br />Age: 24<br />Event: Bottle of rubbing alcohol poured and set on fire<br /><br />- The attacker paid for the bottle of rubbing alcohol with her phone in a transaction that took less than one minute.<br />- Fifty seconds after leaving the register with the bottle, the attacker emptied it over Iris and set her on fire.<br />- Iris had finished a university degree the previous year and was working the register in her family’s shop.<br />- Two hours before the attack, a young man paid at the register and spoke with Iris for approximately thirty seconds about a show.<br />- Surveillance cameras inside the shop recorded the entire sequence of events, providing a complete footage timeline.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1571</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Morning He Said "Princess" - Then the Line Went Quiet</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-morning-he-said-princess-then-the-line-went-quiet--72879167</link><description><![CDATA[The Morning He Said "Princess" - Then the Line Went Quiet<br /><br />A routine morning collapsed into a single chilling sentence: "If by tomorrow at ten in the morning there isn't anything, you're not going to see me again, princess." A car was found abandoned with signs of violence, a five million quetzales demand followed, and one man's voice is the last confirmed trace - so where did Julio Martínez go?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of May 28, 2025, from a supermarket breakfast to a call that cut off mid-sentence, and through the first leads investigators pursued; what happened between that command to "keep driving" and the abandoned vehicle on the main artery out of Guatemala City?<br /><br />Person: Julio Amilcar Martínez Murillo<br />Date: May 28, 2025<br />Location: Guatemala City (main artery out of the capital)<br />Demand: 5,000,000 quetzales<br />Accomplice: Julio Leonardo Alejandro Girón Castañeda<br /><br />- Julio kissed his wife and three daughters goodbye the morning of May 28, 2025.<br />- The secretary heard Julio's voice say something only he would say, then voices in the background and an instruction to "keep driving."<br />- Julio's car was found abandoned the same afternoon with signs of violence inside and no personal items present.<br />- Kidnappers first contacted the family that evening and demanded 5,000,000 quetzales.<br />- Five people were later charged with kidnapping and one charged individual remains a fugitive.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879167</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:43 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879167/0666.mp3" length="27052254" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Morning He Said "Princess" - Then the Line Went Quiet&#13;
&#13;
A routine morning collapsed into a single chilling sentence: "If by tomorrow at ten in the morning there isn't anything, you're not going to see me again, princess." A car was found...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Morning He Said "Princess" - Then the Line Went Quiet<br /><br />A routine morning collapsed into a single chilling sentence: "If by tomorrow at ten in the morning there isn't anything, you're not going to see me again, princess." A car was found abandoned with signs of violence, a five million quetzales demand followed, and one man's voice is the last confirmed trace - so where did Julio Martínez go?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of May 28, 2025, from a supermarket breakfast to a call that cut off mid-sentence, and through the first leads investigators pursued; what happened between that command to "keep driving" and the abandoned vehicle on the main artery out of Guatemala City?<br /><br />Person: Julio Amilcar Martínez Murillo<br />Date: May 28, 2025<br />Location: Guatemala City (main artery out of the capital)<br />Demand: 5,000,000 quetzales<br />Accomplice: Julio Leonardo Alejandro Girón Castañeda<br /><br />- Julio kissed his wife and three daughters goodbye the morning of May 28, 2025.<br />- The secretary heard Julio's voice say something only he would say, then voices in the background and an instruction to "keep driving."<br />- Julio's car was found abandoned the same afternoon with signs of violence inside and no personal items present.<br />- Kidnappers first contacted the family that evening and demanded 5,000,000 quetzales.<br />- Five people were later charged with kidnapping and one charged individual remains a fugitive.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1691</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Scream No One Answered: Inside Frania's Last Hours</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-scream-no-one-answered-inside-frania-s-last-hours--72879164</link><description><![CDATA[The Scream No One Answered: Inside Frania's Last Hours<br /><br />A single, tearing scream split the early hours of August 12, 2019 in a Tegucigalpa neighborhood, followed by heavy blows and then silence - emergency calls were placed but police did not arrive. Hours later a man with a machete stood outside an automotive workshop where Frania Ondina Mondragón would be found; how did that unanswered night become a case resolved in under four months?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened that night and the hours that followed, describing the scene, the people involved, and the timeline from the scream to the conviction, while asking how the silence after the call shaped the outcome.<br /><br />Person: Frania Ondina Mondragón<br />Date: August 12, 2019<br />Location: Tegucigalpa, Honduras<br />Person: Cleofas Castejón Bardales<br />Sentence: 22 years and 6 months<br /><br />- Neighbors heard one long scream in the early hours and immediately called emergency services.<br />- Police did not respond the night of the scream; authorities arrived hours later.<br />- Cleofas Castejón Bardales, age 28, was captured at the rear of the workshop after attempting to run.<br />- Evidence included a blue plastic barrel, clothing and shoes stained dark, a machete, and a broom with dark residue.<br />- The case moved from crime to conviction in fewer than four months with a full confession.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879164</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879164/0665.mp3" length="26718722" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Scream No One Answered: Inside Frania's Last Hours&#13;
&#13;
A single, tearing scream split the early hours of August 12, 2019 in a Tegucigalpa neighborhood, followed by heavy blows and then silence - emergency calls were placed but police did not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Scream No One Answered: Inside Frania's Last Hours<br /><br />A single, tearing scream split the early hours of August 12, 2019 in a Tegucigalpa neighborhood, followed by heavy blows and then silence - emergency calls were placed but police did not arrive. Hours later a man with a machete stood outside an automotive workshop where Frania Ondina Mondragón would be found; how did that unanswered night become a case resolved in under four months?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened that night and the hours that followed, describing the scene, the people involved, and the timeline from the scream to the conviction, while asking how the silence after the call shaped the outcome.<br /><br />Person: Frania Ondina Mondragón<br />Date: August 12, 2019<br />Location: Tegucigalpa, Honduras<br />Person: Cleofas Castejón Bardales<br />Sentence: 22 years and 6 months<br /><br />- Neighbors heard one long scream in the early hours and immediately called emergency services.<br />- Police did not respond the night of the scream; authorities arrived hours later.<br />- Cleofas Castejón Bardales, age 28, was captured at the rear of the workshop after attempting to run.<br />- Evidence included a blue plastic barrel, clothing and shoes stained dark, a machete, and a broom with dark residue.<br />- The case moved from crime to conviction in fewer than four months with a full confession.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1670</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Locked in the Truck: The Mother's Silence That Broke a Child's Last Hours</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/locked-in-the-truck-the-mother-s-silence-that-broke-a-child-s-last-hours--72879160</link><description><![CDATA[Locked in the Truck: The Mother's Silence That Broke a Child's Last Hours<br /><br />The heat inside the truck climbed to 45°C while a three-year-old sat strapped in his car seat for about twelve hours; he died between nine and ten in the morning and lay undiscovered until 1:30 PM. Which version is true: a forgotten accident or something the timeline and digital evidence make hard to accept?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events, the forensic timeline, and the court hearing that followed to ask how hours of messages, social posts, and alcohol consumption fit with the child's death. What in the evidence caused the defense's argument to collapse?<br /><br />Person: Vicente Mesa Ramírez<br />Date: May 2, 2026<br />Location: Mexicali, Baja California<br />Age: 3 years old<br />Mother: Roxana Ramírez Ibarra<br /><br />- Vicente was born on April 17, 2023 and had turned three fifteen days before his death.<br />- He was buckled into his car seat and left in the truck from approximately 11:00 PM until discovery at 1:30 PM the next day (~12.5 hours).<br />- Forensic estimates placed the interior truck temperature at 45°C while ambient exterior temperature ranged between 25°C and 35°C.<br />- Roxana was awake and active on messaging apps and social media until about 5:30 AM and had consumed at least six cans of beer and a bottle of wine according to the state prosecutor's office.<br />- The judge reached a decision after a fifteen-hour court hearing that concluded at 2:00 AM.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879160</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:35 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879160/0664.mp3" length="27754425" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Locked in the Truck: The Mother's Silence That Broke a Child's Last Hours&#13;
&#13;
The heat inside the truck climbed to 45°C while a three-year-old sat strapped in his car seat for about twelve hours; he died between nine and ten in the morning and lay...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Locked in the Truck: The Mother's Silence That Broke a Child's Last Hours<br /><br />The heat inside the truck climbed to 45°C while a three-year-old sat strapped in his car seat for about twelve hours; he died between nine and ten in the morning and lay undiscovered until 1:30 PM. Which version is true: a forgotten accident or something the timeline and digital evidence make hard to accept?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events, the forensic timeline, and the court hearing that followed to ask how hours of messages, social posts, and alcohol consumption fit with the child's death. What in the evidence caused the defense's argument to collapse?<br /><br />Person: Vicente Mesa Ramírez<br />Date: May 2, 2026<br />Location: Mexicali, Baja California<br />Age: 3 years old<br />Mother: Roxana Ramírez Ibarra<br /><br />- Vicente was born on April 17, 2023 and had turned three fifteen days before his death.<br />- He was buckled into his car seat and left in the truck from approximately 11:00 PM until discovery at 1:30 PM the next day (~12.5 hours).<br />- Forensic estimates placed the interior truck temperature at 45°C while ambient exterior temperature ranged between 25°C and 35°C.<br />- Roxana was awake and active on messaging apps and social media until about 5:30 AM and had consumed at least six cans of beer and a bottle of wine according to the state prosecutor's office.<br />- The judge reached a decision after a fifteen-hour court hearing that concluded at 2:00 AM.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1735</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Song That Led to Her Trunk: Inside Celeste's Disappearance</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-song-that-led-to-her-trunk-inside-celeste-s-disappearance--72879157</link><description><![CDATA[The Song That Led to Her Trunk: Inside Celeste's Disappearance<br /><br />A buried pop song, a music video with a model who resembles the missing girl, and a trunk discovered fifteen years after her birth: police opened a towed electric vehicle in Hollywood on September 8, 2025, and found the remains of a fourteen-year-old. How did a viral musician’s online fame and private messages become the thread that led to her body?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the first missing-person report through the discovery in the trunk, tracing online contact, live streams, and the ordinary family moments that never felt ordinary afterward. What decisions, messages, and actions connected a rising artist to a child who kept disappearing?<br /><br />Person: Celeste Abigail Rivas Hernández<br />Date: September 8, 2025<br />Location: Hollywood (towed electric vehicle)<br />Age at disappearance: 13 (last seen April 5, 2024); age at discovery: 14<br />Person: David Anthony Burke<br /><br />- Celeste was born on September 7, 2010, and her remains were found exactly fifteen years later on September 8, 2025.<br />- Celeste first disappeared mid-February 2024 and returned home on February 19, 2024; her parents then confiscated her phone.<br />- Within days after February 19, 2024, David Anthony Burke paid $1,000 to a student to deliver a replacement phone directly to Celeste.<br />- Celeste joined David Burke’s fan messaging server in January 2022 at age 11; Burke was 17 at that time.<br />- The third and final disappearance was reported April 5, 2024, when Celeste was 13; she did not return.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879157</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879157/0663.mp3" length="27220273" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Song That Led to Her Trunk: Inside Celeste's Disappearance&#13;
&#13;
A buried pop song, a music video with a model who resembles the missing girl, and a trunk discovered fifteen years after her birth: police opened a towed electric vehicle in Hollywood...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Song That Led to Her Trunk: Inside Celeste's Disappearance<br /><br />A buried pop song, a music video with a model who resembles the missing girl, and a trunk discovered fifteen years after her birth: police opened a towed electric vehicle in Hollywood on September 8, 2025, and found the remains of a fourteen-year-old. How did a viral musician’s online fame and private messages become the thread that led to her body?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the first missing-person report through the discovery in the trunk, tracing online contact, live streams, and the ordinary family moments that never felt ordinary afterward. What decisions, messages, and actions connected a rising artist to a child who kept disappearing?<br /><br />Person: Celeste Abigail Rivas Hernández<br />Date: September 8, 2025<br />Location: Hollywood (towed electric vehicle)<br />Age at disappearance: 13 (last seen April 5, 2024); age at discovery: 14<br />Person: David Anthony Burke<br /><br />- Celeste was born on September 7, 2010, and her remains were found exactly fifteen years later on September 8, 2025.<br />- Celeste first disappeared mid-February 2024 and returned home on February 19, 2024; her parents then confiscated her phone.<br />- Within days after February 19, 2024, David Anthony Burke paid $1,000 to a student to deliver a replacement phone directly to Celeste.<br />- Celeste joined David Burke’s fan messaging server in January 2022 at age 11; Burke was 17 at that time.<br />- The third and final disappearance was reported April 5, 2024, when Celeste was 13; she did not return.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1702</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Billionaire's Last Hike: Footprints That Don't Add Up</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-billionaire-s-last-hike-footprints-that-don-t-add-up--72879153</link><description><![CDATA[The Billionaire's Last Hike: Footprints That Don't Add Up<br /><br />A billionaire who built a fashion empire for 2,500 stores across 109 countries died on a non-technical beginner's trail while in excellent health, and his son was the only witness - yet the footprints on the stone didn't fit the story. What single detail about those footprints changes everything about the fall on Montserrat?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events on December 14, 2024, from a routine father-son hike to a fatal fall, the delayed emergency call, and the investigation that focused on messages, missing bodyguards, and the footprints that refuse to add up. How did visits made by the son in the days before and the absence of security alter the simple explanation?<br /><br />Person: Isaac Andik<br />Date: December 14, 2024<br />Location: Montserrat mountain range, northwest of Barcelona<br />Company: Mango - 2,500 stores in 109 countries (as of 2012)<br />Witness: Jonathan Andik<br /><br />- Isaac was born October 1, 1953, in Istanbul, Turkey.<br />- Mango operated in 109 countries with 2,500 stores by 2012.<br />- Jonathan toured the route to Montserrat four times in consecutive days before December 14, 2024.<br />- Isaac never traveled without bodyguards, but none accompanied them that morning.<br />- Jonathan called Estefanía first and emergency services only afterward; Isaac's body was found hours later below the fall site.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879153</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879153/0662.mp3" length="27014637" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Billionaire's Last Hike: Footprints That Don't Add Up&#13;
&#13;
A billionaire who built a fashion empire for 2,500 stores across 109 countries died on a non-technical beginner's trail while in excellent health, and his son was the only witness - yet the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Billionaire's Last Hike: Footprints That Don't Add Up<br /><br />A billionaire who built a fashion empire for 2,500 stores across 109 countries died on a non-technical beginner's trail while in excellent health, and his son was the only witness - yet the footprints on the stone didn't fit the story. What single detail about those footprints changes everything about the fall on Montserrat?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events on December 14, 2024, from a routine father-son hike to a fatal fall, the delayed emergency call, and the investigation that focused on messages, missing bodyguards, and the footprints that refuse to add up. How did visits made by the son in the days before and the absence of security alter the simple explanation?<br /><br />Person: Isaac Andik<br />Date: December 14, 2024<br />Location: Montserrat mountain range, northwest of Barcelona<br />Company: Mango - 2,500 stores in 109 countries (as of 2012)<br />Witness: Jonathan Andik<br /><br />- Isaac was born October 1, 1953, in Istanbul, Turkey.<br />- Mango operated in 109 countries with 2,500 stores by 2012.<br />- Jonathan toured the route to Montserrat four times in consecutive days before December 14, 2024.<br />- Isaac never traveled without bodyguards, but none accompanied them that morning.<br />- Jonathan called Estefanía first and emergency services only afterward; Isaac's body was found hours later below the fall site.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1689</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Walked In For Lipo - Cameras Caught What Followed Next</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-walked-in-for-lipo-cameras-caught-what-followed-next--72879150</link><description><![CDATA[She Walked In For Lipo - Cameras Caught What Followed Next<br /><br />A woman entered a penthouse for a two-hour cosmetic procedure and never walked out; three days later her body was found in a drainage ditch outside Puebla. Security footage shows two people loading something into a red car the night she disappeared - who were they, and what did the cameras actually record?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Blanca Adriana Vázquez Montiel from the morning she left for a Microaire liposuction until the moment a passerby discovered her body. We follow the trail from a rented penthouse operating as a clinic with no health permit to the empty phone calls and locked doors that greeted her husband, and ask how trust became the weapon in a routine cosmetic appointment.<br /><br />Person: Blanca Adriana Vázquez Montiel<br />Date: May 18, 2026 (appointment) and May 21, 2026 (body found)<br />Location: San Andrés Cholula (appointment), outskirts of Puebla (body found)<br />Price: 14,000 pesos for Microaire plus 3,000 pesos for skin retraction<br />Procedure: Microaire liposuction, described as two hours with local anesthesia and no hospital stay<br /><br />- Blanca was born in 1989 in Huachinango and was 37 years old at the time of the procedure.<br />- The clinic advertised Microaire liposuction at 14,000 pesos and an additional 3,000 pesos for skin retraction.<br />- The penthouse used as the clinic had no health permit and the operator had no medical or nursing records in public health registries.<br />- Two people were recorded on cameras loading something into the trunk of a small red car the night Blanca disappeared.<br />- Blanca’s husband Florencio left around 5:00 PM to buy a compression garment and returned about an hour later to find the unit dark, doors locked, and phones unanswered.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879150</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:24 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879150/0661.mp3" length="27096557" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Walked In For Lipo - Cameras Caught What Followed Next&#13;
&#13;
A woman entered a penthouse for a two-hour cosmetic procedure and never walked out; three days later her body was found in a drainage ditch outside Puebla. Security footage shows two people...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Walked In For Lipo - Cameras Caught What Followed Next<br /><br />A woman entered a penthouse for a two-hour cosmetic procedure and never walked out; three days later her body was found in a drainage ditch outside Puebla. Security footage shows two people loading something into a red car the night she disappeared - who were they, and what did the cameras actually record?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Blanca Adriana Vázquez Montiel from the morning she left for a Microaire liposuction until the moment a passerby discovered her body. We follow the trail from a rented penthouse operating as a clinic with no health permit to the empty phone calls and locked doors that greeted her husband, and ask how trust became the weapon in a routine cosmetic appointment.<br /><br />Person: Blanca Adriana Vázquez Montiel<br />Date: May 18, 2026 (appointment) and May 21, 2026 (body found)<br />Location: San Andrés Cholula (appointment), outskirts of Puebla (body found)<br />Price: 14,000 pesos for Microaire plus 3,000 pesos for skin retraction<br />Procedure: Microaire liposuction, described as two hours with local anesthesia and no hospital stay<br /><br />- Blanca was born in 1989 in Huachinango and was 37 years old at the time of the procedure.<br />- The clinic advertised Microaire liposuction at 14,000 pesos and an additional 3,000 pesos for skin retraction.<br />- The penthouse used as the clinic had no health permit and the operator had no medical or nursing records in public health registries.<br />- Two people were recorded on cameras loading something into the trunk of a small red car the night Blanca disappeared.<br />- Blanca’s husband Florencio left around 5:00 PM to buy a compression garment and returned about an hour later to find the unit dark, doors locked, and phones unanswered.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1694</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Night Her Phone Went Dead: The Silence That Holds Berenice</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-night-her-phone-went-dead-the-silence-that-holds-berenice--72879146</link><description><![CDATA[The Night Her Phone Went Dead: The Silence That Holds Berenice<br /><br />Her phone has been off since November 26, 2023, and the last person with her that night was arrested nearly two years later with her devices in his house - yet he has not spoken. What can visible evidence and two years of silence tell us about a seventeen-year-old who vanished after a midnight drive?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the timeline of Berenice Campo Ramírez’s last known hours, the family’s experience, and the unresolved questions surrounding the man who answered her phone and later faced arrest. How did a night that began with laughter end with a phone that never turned back on?<br /><br />Person: Berenice Campo Ramírez<br />Date of disappearance: November 26, 2023<br />Age: 17<br />Birth date: December 15, 2006<br />Last confirmed sighting: on a road in Morelos after midnight on November 26, 2023<br /><br />- Berenice was born December 15, 2006, in Juitepec, Morelos.<br />- She sat at a family dinner on November 24, 2023, with Miguel Salcedo Villanueva present.<br />- On November 26, 2023, Berenice left Tepoztlán after midnight with Miguel and her cousin Mimi.<br />- Miguel answered a call from Berenice’s mother that night and said the phone battery was low.<br />- A formal missing persons report was filed in January 2024.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879146</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879146/0660.mp3" length="25397135" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Night Her Phone Went Dead: The Silence That Holds Berenice&#13;
&#13;
Her phone has been off since November 26, 2023, and the last person with her that night was arrested nearly two years later with her devices in his house - yet he has not spoken. What...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Night Her Phone Went Dead: The Silence That Holds Berenice<br /><br />Her phone has been off since November 26, 2023, and the last person with her that night was arrested nearly two years later with her devices in his house - yet he has not spoken. What can visible evidence and two years of silence tell us about a seventeen-year-old who vanished after a midnight drive?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the timeline of Berenice Campo Ramírez’s last known hours, the family’s experience, and the unresolved questions surrounding the man who answered her phone and later faced arrest. How did a night that began with laughter end with a phone that never turned back on?<br /><br />Person: Berenice Campo Ramírez<br />Date of disappearance: November 26, 2023<br />Age: 17<br />Birth date: December 15, 2006<br />Last confirmed sighting: on a road in Morelos after midnight on November 26, 2023<br /><br />- Berenice was born December 15, 2006, in Juitepec, Morelos.<br />- She sat at a family dinner on November 24, 2023, with Miguel Salcedo Villanueva present.<br />- On November 26, 2023, Berenice left Tepoztlán after midnight with Miguel and her cousin Mimi.<br />- Miguel answered a call from Berenice’s mother that night and said the phone battery was low.<br />- A formal missing persons report was filed in January 2024.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1588</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Night He Broke In: How Her Hands Saved Her Life</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-night-he-broke-in-how-her-hands-saved-her-life--72879145</link><description><![CDATA[The Night He Broke In: How Her Hands Saved Her Life<br /><br />The night a restraining order, an arrest and a $50,000 bail decision all failed, a woman pressed her bare hands against a wound that "should not have been survivable." This episode follows the May 23, 2024 attack on special effects makeup artist Ali Shehorn and asks how the legal safeguards meant to protect her unraveled in plain sight.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the relationship, the documented abuse, the arrest and bail, to the early-morning break-in at a friend's house in north Los Angeles - and probe why those protections did not stop the attack. How did a system that registered felony charges and issued a restraining order still leave her vulnerable?<br /><br />Person: Ali Shehorn<br />Person: Nicolas Pascual<br />Date: May 23, 2024<br />Location: Cristín's house, north Los Angeles<br />Event: Arrest and $50,000 bail five days before the attack<br /><br />- Ali Shehorn is a union member of the professional makeup artists and hairstylists guild who specialized in silicone prosthetics and false injuries.<br />- The attack occurred at approximately 4:30 a.m. on the morning of May 23, 2024.<br />- Nicolas Pascual, born April 12, 1990, was arrested on a felony domestic violence charge five days before the attack.<br />- Pascual posted $50,000 in bail and was released within hours of his arrest.<br />- Ali had filed a restraining order, requested police protection, and moved into a friend's house prior to the attack.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879145</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:17 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879145/0659.mp3" length="21059973" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Night He Broke In: How Her Hands Saved Her Life&#13;
&#13;
The night a restraining order, an arrest and a $50,000 bail decision all failed, a woman pressed her bare hands against a wound that "should not have been survivable." This episode follows the May...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Night He Broke In: How Her Hands Saved Her Life<br /><br />The night a restraining order, an arrest and a $50,000 bail decision all failed, a woman pressed her bare hands against a wound that "should not have been survivable." This episode follows the May 23, 2024 attack on special effects makeup artist Ali Shehorn and asks how the legal safeguards meant to protect her unraveled in plain sight.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the relationship, the documented abuse, the arrest and bail, to the early-morning break-in at a friend's house in north Los Angeles - and probe why those protections did not stop the attack. How did a system that registered felony charges and issued a restraining order still leave her vulnerable?<br /><br />Person: Ali Shehorn<br />Person: Nicolas Pascual<br />Date: May 23, 2024<br />Location: Cristín's house, north Los Angeles<br />Event: Arrest and $50,000 bail five days before the attack<br /><br />- Ali Shehorn is a union member of the professional makeup artists and hairstylists guild who specialized in silicone prosthetics and false injuries.<br />- The attack occurred at approximately 4:30 a.m. on the morning of May 23, 2024.<br />- Nicolas Pascual, born April 12, 1990, was arrested on a felony domestic violence charge five days before the attack.<br />- Pascual posted $50,000 in bail and was released within hours of his arrest.<br />- Ali had filed a restraining order, requested police protection, and moved into a friend's house prior to the attack.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1317</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Call, the Camera, and a Cousin Who Never Explained Why</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-call-the-camera-and-a-cousin-who-never-explained-why--72879144</link><description><![CDATA[The Call, the Camera, and a Cousin Who Never Explained Why<br /><br />The morning Litzi Cordón left on her motorcycle she never reached the store she worked at, and a ransom call for five million quetzals followed from a voice her grandmother did not recognize; yet a license plate on camera footage pointed to a family member. How did a routine ride, security cameras, and a single phone call converge into a trail that ended with Litzi found the next day?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from Litzi leaving before dawn on October 5, 2020, through the activation of Guatemala's Isabel Claudina Protocol, the ransom call to her grandmother, and the discovery of her body the morning of October 6. What did the cameras record, and why did the license plate lead to someone in her family?<br /><br />Person: Lzia Amelia Cordón Guardado<br />Date missing: October 5, 2020<br />Date found: October 6, 2020<br />Age: 20<br />Protocol: Isabel Claudina<br /><br />- Litzi was born on May 30, 2000, and was 20 years old at the time of her disappearance.<br />- The ransom caller demanded five million quetzals (about $650,000) and offered no proof of life.<br />- Litzi worked at her grandmother's abarrotes store Monday through Friday beginning at 6:00 a.m.<br />- A white car was captured on camera following Litzi's motorcycle closely on the morning of October 5, 2020, and the license plate pointed to a family member.<br />- Litzi's body was found on October 6, 2020, with forensic findings documenting compression to the neck, multiple injuries, and signs of sexual assault.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879144</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879144/0658.mp3" length="25351996" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Call, the Camera, and a Cousin Who Never Explained Why&#13;
&#13;
The morning Litzi Cordón left on her motorcycle she never reached the store she worked at, and a ransom call for five million quetzals followed from a voice her grandmother did not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Call, the Camera, and a Cousin Who Never Explained Why<br /><br />The morning Litzi Cordón left on her motorcycle she never reached the store she worked at, and a ransom call for five million quetzals followed from a voice her grandmother did not recognize; yet a license plate on camera footage pointed to a family member. How did a routine ride, security cameras, and a single phone call converge into a trail that ended with Litzi found the next day?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from Litzi leaving before dawn on October 5, 2020, through the activation of Guatemala's Isabel Claudina Protocol, the ransom call to her grandmother, and the discovery of her body the morning of October 6. What did the cameras record, and why did the license plate lead to someone in her family?<br /><br />Person: Lzia Amelia Cordón Guardado<br />Date missing: October 5, 2020<br />Date found: October 6, 2020<br />Age: 20<br />Protocol: Isabel Claudina<br /><br />- Litzi was born on May 30, 2000, and was 20 years old at the time of her disappearance.<br />- The ransom caller demanded five million quetzals (about $650,000) and offered no proof of life.<br />- Litzi worked at her grandmother's abarrotes store Monday through Friday beginning at 6:00 a.m.<br />- A white car was captured on camera following Litzi's motorcycle closely on the morning of October 5, 2020, and the license plate pointed to a family member.<br />- Litzi's body was found on October 6, 2020, with forensic findings documenting compression to the neck, multiple injuries, and signs of sexual assault.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1585</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Opened the Door to Death Meant for Her Sister</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-opened-the-door-to-death-meant-for-her-sister--72879143</link><description><![CDATA[She Opened the Door to Death Meant for Her Sister<br /><br />The babysitter heard seven sharp sounds before two in the morning on September 20, 2017, and a twenty-four-year-old woman pressed her body against the front door with bullet holes as if trying to hold it shut. The victim, Alisha Canales Muire, had been married sixty-three days and was not the target - the shooter had been paid to kill the woman who lived there. How did a payment of $24,400 and a drive-by reconnaissance end with the wrong sister dead?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events that night, the family relationships that explain why Alisha was at Amanda’s house, and the payments and movements that tied two men to the attack, asking whether a planned hit became a fatal mistake when the wrong door was opened.<br /><br />Person: Alisha Canales Muire<br />Age: 24<br />Date: September 20, 2017<br />Payment: $24,400 paid to Jerradon Felps<br />Relation: Victim was sister of Amanda Lewis<br /><br />- The babysitter called 911 before 2:00 a.m. after hearing seven sharp sounds coming from the front door.<br />- Alisha had been married for 63 days at the time of her death.<br />- Seven shots were fired through a partially opened front door and adjacent wall.<br />- Kevin Lewis paid Jerradon Felps $24,400 in cash and drove him past the house the same day.<br />- Amanda had been attacked in June 2017 with a wound above her eyebrow requiring reconstructive surgery; she was out of town in New York on September 20, 2017.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879143</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:10 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879143/0657.mp3" length="27496544" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Opened the Door to Death Meant for Her Sister&#13;
&#13;
The babysitter heard seven sharp sounds before two in the morning on September 20, 2017, and a twenty-four-year-old woman pressed her body against the front door with bullet holes as if trying to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Opened the Door to Death Meant for Her Sister<br /><br />The babysitter heard seven sharp sounds before two in the morning on September 20, 2017, and a twenty-four-year-old woman pressed her body against the front door with bullet holes as if trying to hold it shut. The victim, Alisha Canales Muire, had been married sixty-three days and was not the target - the shooter had been paid to kill the woman who lived there. How did a payment of $24,400 and a drive-by reconnaissance end with the wrong sister dead?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events that night, the family relationships that explain why Alisha was at Amanda’s house, and the payments and movements that tied two men to the attack, asking whether a planned hit became a fatal mistake when the wrong door was opened.<br /><br />Person: Alisha Canales Muire<br />Age: 24<br />Date: September 20, 2017<br />Payment: $24,400 paid to Jerradon Felps<br />Relation: Victim was sister of Amanda Lewis<br /><br />- The babysitter called 911 before 2:00 a.m. after hearing seven sharp sounds coming from the front door.<br />- Alisha had been married for 63 days at the time of her death.<br />- Seven shots were fired through a partially opened front door and adjacent wall.<br />- Kevin Lewis paid Jerradon Felps $24,400 in cash and drove him past the house the same day.<br />- Amanda had been attacked in June 2017 with a wound above her eyebrow requiring reconstructive surgery; she was out of town in New York on September 20, 2017.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1719</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Call That Refused CPR: Her Last Four Minutes Alive</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-call-that-refused-cpr-her-last-four-minutes-alive--72879141</link><description><![CDATA[The Call That Refused CPR: Her Last Four Minutes Alive<br /><br />A less-than-four-minute 999 call records a man telling an operator a woman was hit by a car, then saying she was inside his vehicle and refusing to start CPR because "it's already too late." That recording was played in an English courtroom and features a nineteen-year-old woman who was still breathing - so why was CPR denied?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the bus stop to the van, the short recording played in court, and the details around the relationship and pregnancy that shaped the night. We follow the timeline and the questions raised by the detours, the footage, and the single emergency call: what happened in those final forty minutes?<br /><br />Person: Lily White<br />Date: 5 November 2025<br />Age: 19<br />Person: Mohamed Asim<br />Charge: Murder<br />Location: England<br /><br />- Lily White was born on 1 June 2006.<br />- Lily weighed 44 kilograms and stood 1.60 meters at the time of her death.<br />- Mohamed Asim was 41 years old and a truck driver, twenty years older than Lily.<br />- The emergency call that lasts less than four minutes was played in court and includes the caller refusing to begin CPR.<br />- On the night of 5 November 2025, CCTV from a nearby school recorded Lily moving quickly away from the van and an argument outside the vehicle.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879141</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879141/0656.mp3" length="22725958" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Call That Refused CPR: Her Last Four Minutes Alive&#13;
&#13;
A less-than-four-minute 999 call records a man telling an operator a woman was hit by a car, then saying she was inside his vehicle and refusing to start CPR because "it's already too late."...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Call That Refused CPR: Her Last Four Minutes Alive<br /><br />A less-than-four-minute 999 call records a man telling an operator a woman was hit by a car, then saying she was inside his vehicle and refusing to start CPR because "it's already too late." That recording was played in an English courtroom and features a nineteen-year-old woman who was still breathing - so why was CPR denied?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the bus stop to the van, the short recording played in court, and the details around the relationship and pregnancy that shaped the night. We follow the timeline and the questions raised by the detours, the footage, and the single emergency call: what happened in those final forty minutes?<br /><br />Person: Lily White<br />Date: 5 November 2025<br />Age: 19<br />Person: Mohamed Asim<br />Charge: Murder<br />Location: England<br /><br />- Lily White was born on 1 June 2006.<br />- Lily weighed 44 kilograms and stood 1.60 meters at the time of her death.<br />- Mohamed Asim was 41 years old and a truck driver, twenty years older than Lily.<br />- The emergency call that lasts less than four minutes was played in court and includes the caller refusing to begin CPR.<br />- On the night of 5 November 2025, CCTV from a nearby school recorded Lily moving quickly away from the van and an argument outside the vehicle.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1421</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Vanished Two Hundred Meters Away-Then Reappeared 32 Years Later</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-vanished-two-hundred-meters-away-then-reappeared-32-years-later--72879140</link><description><![CDATA[She Vanished Two Hundred Meters Away-Then Reappeared 32 Years Later<br /><br />The unsolved disappearance happened in broad Arizona daylight: a thirteen-year-old walked two hundred meters to a stable and simply ceased to exist. Thirty-two years later she was found alive at age forty-five and refused to say a single word about where she had been - what happened in those missing decades?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from May 15, 1994 through the case closure on April 1, 2026, recounting the original search, the family situation that placed Cristina at the property, the puzzling lack of leads, and the late discovery of paperwork in Portland that used her name and birth date; can the silence be explained?<br /><br />Person: Cristina Marie Plant<br />Date: May 15, 1994<br />Birth Date: January 23, 1981<br />Location: Arizona property near open desert<br />Case Closure Date: April 1, 2026<br /><br />- Cristina was 13 years old when she left her uncle’s house on May 15, 1994.<br />- The walk from the house to the stable was approximately 200 meters and under three minutes.<br />- Search efforts included police, neighbors, volunteers, tracking dogs, and helicopters and returned no usable leads.<br />- Cristina’s uncle and aunt offered a $10,000 reward that produced no tips.<br />- A document later surfaced showing someone in Portland using the name Cristina Marie Plant with the same January 23, 1981 birth date.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879140</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879140/0655.mp3" length="23483718" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Vanished Two Hundred Meters Away-Then Reappeared 32 Years Later&#13;
&#13;
The unsolved disappearance happened in broad Arizona daylight: a thirteen-year-old walked two hundred meters to a stable and simply ceased to exist. Thirty-two years later she was...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Vanished Two Hundred Meters Away-Then Reappeared 32 Years Later<br /><br />The unsolved disappearance happened in broad Arizona daylight: a thirteen-year-old walked two hundred meters to a stable and simply ceased to exist. Thirty-two years later she was found alive at age forty-five and refused to say a single word about where she had been - what happened in those missing decades?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from May 15, 1994 through the case closure on April 1, 2026, recounting the original search, the family situation that placed Cristina at the property, the puzzling lack of leads, and the late discovery of paperwork in Portland that used her name and birth date; can the silence be explained?<br /><br />Person: Cristina Marie Plant<br />Date: May 15, 1994<br />Birth Date: January 23, 1981<br />Location: Arizona property near open desert<br />Case Closure Date: April 1, 2026<br /><br />- Cristina was 13 years old when she left her uncle’s house on May 15, 1994.<br />- The walk from the house to the stable was approximately 200 meters and under three minutes.<br />- Search efforts included police, neighbors, volunteers, tracking dogs, and helicopters and returned no usable leads.<br />- Cristina’s uncle and aunt offered a $10,000 reward that produced no tips.<br />- A document later surfaced showing someone in Portland using the name Cristina Marie Plant with the same January 23, 1981 birth date.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1468</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Sent Her Last Message - But She'd Been Dead Since 5am</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-sent-her-last-message-but-she-d-been-dead-since-5am--72879139</link><description><![CDATA[He Sent Her Last Message - But She'd Been Dead Since 5am<br /><br />A stranger used a dead woman's phone to send a living man a message in English on the morning of Saturday, April 6, 2024 - and no one realized the victim had been dead since before 5:00 a.m. Why was the house left closed for days, and who was the 16-year-old guest who moved in after offering £90,000 to rent the whole six-bedroom mansion?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events leading to Angela Tiampipat's death and the confusing days that followed, from the private-jet guest who wanted to pay off-platform to the delayed forced entry that revealed her body. What decisions and missed signals allowed someone to use her phone while she lay inside?<br /><br />Person: Angela Tiampipat<br />Age: 27<br />Date found: Monday, April 8, 2024<br />Cause of death: multiple stab wounds<br />Suspected guest name: Elso Betamiio<br /><br />- Angela was dropped at the mansion by a rideshare sometime before 5:00 a.m. on Saturday, April 6, 2024.<br />- Police first attended a call on Sunday night and classified the report as low risk, issuing a reference number and leaving without forcing entry.<br />- The front door was forced open by police at 8:00 a.m. on Monday, April 8, 2024, revealing the body had been inside since Saturday.<br />- A weapon was found at the scene and forensic analysis indicated injuries across different parts of the body consistent with a sustained attack.<br />- The guest who viewed the property on April 5 offered £30,000 for one month and then £90,000 for three months and later pressed to move in immediately, requesting the transaction be completed outside the rental platform.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879139</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879139/0654.mp3" length="22308835" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Sent Her Last Message - But She'd Been Dead Since 5am&#13;
&#13;
A stranger used a dead woman's phone to send a living man a message in English on the morning of Saturday, April 6, 2024 - and no one realized the victim had been dead since before 5:00 a.m....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Sent Her Last Message - But She'd Been Dead Since 5am<br /><br />A stranger used a dead woman's phone to send a living man a message in English on the morning of Saturday, April 6, 2024 - and no one realized the victim had been dead since before 5:00 a.m. Why was the house left closed for days, and who was the 16-year-old guest who moved in after offering £90,000 to rent the whole six-bedroom mansion?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events leading to Angela Tiampipat's death and the confusing days that followed, from the private-jet guest who wanted to pay off-platform to the delayed forced entry that revealed her body. What decisions and missed signals allowed someone to use her phone while she lay inside?<br /><br />Person: Angela Tiampipat<br />Age: 27<br />Date found: Monday, April 8, 2024<br />Cause of death: multiple stab wounds<br />Suspected guest name: Elso Betamiio<br /><br />- Angela was dropped at the mansion by a rideshare sometime before 5:00 a.m. on Saturday, April 6, 2024.<br />- Police first attended a call on Sunday night and classified the report as low risk, issuing a reference number and leaving without forcing entry.<br />- The front door was forced open by police at 8:00 a.m. on Monday, April 8, 2024, revealing the body had been inside since Saturday.<br />- A weapon was found at the scene and forensic analysis indicated injuries across different parts of the body consistent with a sustained attack.<br />- The guest who viewed the property on April 5 offered £30,000 for one month and then £90,000 for three months and later pressed to move in immediately, requesting the transaction be completed outside the rental platform.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1395</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Told Them Who'd Kill Her - They Let Her Walk to Death</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-told-them-who-d-kill-her-they-let-her-walk-to-death--72879138</link><description><![CDATA[She Told Them Who'd Kill Her - They Let Her Walk to Death<br /><br />At 5:21 a.m., a man stepped out of a parked car and walked 230 meters to a nurse who had already named her killer; surveillance captured her turning her head in the last seconds of life. How did a formal complaint, a night in custody, and repeated warnings end with her walking into death?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from Norma Patricia Ayala’s liposculpture procedure to the moments before her killing, following the complaints she filed, the brief detention of the accused, and the institutional responses that failed her. What does the record reveal about the warnings she gave and why they were ignored?<br /><br />Person: Norma Patricia Ayala<br />Date of birth: 1994<br />Age at death: 30<br />Accused: José Humberto Cuellar Ferrara<br />Procedure: Liposculpture in May 2022<br /><br />- Norma boarded public transit in the hours before her killing, captured in a photo on the suspect’s phone.<br />- The attacker walked 230 meters from the parked vehicle to Norma’s location at 5:21 a.m.<br />- Norma filed a formal complaint in January 2023 alleging malpractice, sexual harassment, and threats.<br />- José Humberto was detained in March 2023 and released the following day after one night in custody.<br />- The clinic surgery in May 2022 produced abdominal tissue necrosis documented by a public medical center.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879138</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:57 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879138/0653.mp3" length="22065583" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Told Them Who'd Kill Her - They Let Her Walk to Death&#13;
&#13;
At 5:21 a.m., a man stepped out of a parked car and walked 230 meters to a nurse who had already named her killer; surveillance captured her turning her head in the last seconds of life. How...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Told Them Who'd Kill Her - They Let Her Walk to Death<br /><br />At 5:21 a.m., a man stepped out of a parked car and walked 230 meters to a nurse who had already named her killer; surveillance captured her turning her head in the last seconds of life. How did a formal complaint, a night in custody, and repeated warnings end with her walking into death?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from Norma Patricia Ayala’s liposculpture procedure to the moments before her killing, following the complaints she filed, the brief detention of the accused, and the institutional responses that failed her. What does the record reveal about the warnings she gave and why they were ignored?<br /><br />Person: Norma Patricia Ayala<br />Date of birth: 1994<br />Age at death: 30<br />Accused: José Humberto Cuellar Ferrara<br />Procedure: Liposculpture in May 2022<br /><br />- Norma boarded public transit in the hours before her killing, captured in a photo on the suspect’s phone.<br />- The attacker walked 230 meters from the parked vehicle to Norma’s location at 5:21 a.m.<br />- Norma filed a formal complaint in January 2023 alleging malpractice, sexual harassment, and threats.<br />- José Humberto was detained in March 2023 and released the following day after one night in custody.<br />- The clinic surgery in May 2022 produced abdominal tissue necrosis documented by a public medical center.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1380</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Call That Replaced Her Last Goodbye: Bianca's Vanished Witness</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-call-that-replaced-her-last-goodbye-bianca-s-vanished-witness--72879137</link><description><![CDATA[The Call That Replaced Her Last Goodbye: Bianca's Vanished Witness<br /><br />A single phone call replaced the routine goodbye Bianca made to her mother for years, and that voice changed the story investigators would tell for months. Bianca’s laptop disappeared, her designer shoes and dresses stayed, and the scene was catalogued as robbery with violence - but why was the person who called her mother the first caller that night also the last person who should have been calling?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline, the people in Bianca Fernanda Moreno La Bastida’s circle, and the small details that forced the case out of a familiar category and into unanswered questions. How did one uncertain call, a missing laptop, and a suitcase removed before the scene was secured reshape the investigation into her death?<br /><br />Person: Bianca Fernanda Moreno La Bastida<br />Date of birth: May 3, 1986<br />Age: 31<br />Location: Playa del Carmen, Quintana Roo<br />Initial classification: Robbery with violence<br /><br />- Bianca called her mother every afternoon; she did not call on February 21, 2018.<br />- Paramedics took more than 40 minutes to arrive after the call to Bianca’s mother.<br />- Bianca was taken first to a private clinic that turned her away, then to a public hospital where she died minutes after arrival.<br />- The case remained classified as robbery with violence for one month and a half before that theory was questioned.<br />- Adi Candelaria Almeida Chávez, age 38, removed a suitcase of Bianca’s belongings from the apartment before the scene was fully catalogued.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879137</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879137/0652.mp3" length="27463108" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Call That Replaced Her Last Goodbye: Bianca's Vanished Witness&#13;
&#13;
A single phone call replaced the routine goodbye Bianca made to her mother for years, and that voice changed the story investigators would tell for months. Bianca’s laptop...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Call That Replaced Her Last Goodbye: Bianca's Vanished Witness<br /><br />A single phone call replaced the routine goodbye Bianca made to her mother for years, and that voice changed the story investigators would tell for months. Bianca’s laptop disappeared, her designer shoes and dresses stayed, and the scene was catalogued as robbery with violence - but why was the person who called her mother the first caller that night also the last person who should have been calling?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline, the people in Bianca Fernanda Moreno La Bastida’s circle, and the small details that forced the case out of a familiar category and into unanswered questions. How did one uncertain call, a missing laptop, and a suitcase removed before the scene was secured reshape the investigation into her death?<br /><br />Person: Bianca Fernanda Moreno La Bastida<br />Date of birth: May 3, 1986<br />Age: 31<br />Location: Playa del Carmen, Quintana Roo<br />Initial classification: Robbery with violence<br /><br />- Bianca called her mother every afternoon; she did not call on February 21, 2018.<br />- Paramedics took more than 40 minutes to arrive after the call to Bianca’s mother.<br />- Bianca was taken first to a private clinic that turned her away, then to a public hospital where she died minutes after arrival.<br />- The case remained classified as robbery with violence for one month and a half before that theory was questioned.<br />- Adi Candelaria Almeida Chávez, age 38, removed a suitcase of Bianca’s belongings from the apartment before the scene was fully catalogued.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1717</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Girl Who Left Twice: Hidden Body Three Blocks Away</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-girl-who-left-twice-hidden-body-three-blocks-away--72879136</link><description><![CDATA[The Girl Who Left Twice: Hidden Body Three Blocks Away<br /><br />A thirteen-year-old went out twice that Friday - the second time she never returned, and by 4:00 p.m. her body was found hidden under cardboard and wooden crates inside a neighbor’s home three blocks from her house. Neighbors searched the streets while she was already inside that house; one man inside gave three different versions of what happened. Who knows exactly what happened in the hours between her second walk out and four o’clock?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Sol Selena Gómez Montiel from Chaco, Argentina, describing her last day, the neighborhood search, the conflicting statements at a neighbor’s door, and how police discovered her body. How did an ordinary errand become the last thing she ever did?<br /><br />Person: Sol Selena Gómez Montiel<br />Date: March 21, 2025<br />Location: Chaco, Argentina<br />Age: 13<br />Suspect: Benjamín Andrés Castillo<br /><br />- Sol left home twice the same afternoon; she returned from the first trip but did not return after the second.<br />- Police found her body at 4:00 p.m. hidden under cardboard and wooden crates inside Benjamín’s home three blocks from her house.<br />- Benjamín gave three different accounts about Sol’s disappearance to neighbors and police.<br />- Benjamín’s judicial record included a domestic violence incident from the year before against his grandfather.<br />- Sol lived with her mother Micaela and grandmother Julia and had just turned thirteen days before March 21, 2025.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879136</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:50 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879136/0651.mp3" length="23634184" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Girl Who Left Twice: Hidden Body Three Blocks Away&#13;
&#13;
A thirteen-year-old went out twice that Friday - the second time she never returned, and by 4:00 p.m. her body was found hidden under cardboard and wooden crates inside a neighbor’s home three...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Girl Who Left Twice: Hidden Body Three Blocks Away<br /><br />A thirteen-year-old went out twice that Friday - the second time she never returned, and by 4:00 p.m. her body was found hidden under cardboard and wooden crates inside a neighbor’s home three blocks from her house. Neighbors searched the streets while she was already inside that house; one man inside gave three different versions of what happened. Who knows exactly what happened in the hours between her second walk out and four o’clock?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Sol Selena Gómez Montiel from Chaco, Argentina, describing her last day, the neighborhood search, the conflicting statements at a neighbor’s door, and how police discovered her body. How did an ordinary errand become the last thing she ever did?<br /><br />Person: Sol Selena Gómez Montiel<br />Date: March 21, 2025<br />Location: Chaco, Argentina<br />Age: 13<br />Suspect: Benjamín Andrés Castillo<br /><br />- Sol left home twice the same afternoon; she returned from the first trip but did not return after the second.<br />- Police found her body at 4:00 p.m. hidden under cardboard and wooden crates inside Benjamín’s home three blocks from her house.<br />- Benjamín gave three different accounts about Sol’s disappearance to neighbors and police.<br />- Benjamín’s judicial record included a domestic violence incident from the year before against his grandfather.<br />- Sol lived with her mother Micaela and grandmother Julia and had just turned thirteen days before March 21, 2025.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1478</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The 50-Year File: How a Government Watched Frank Hardy to Death</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-50-year-file-how-a-government-watched-frank-hardy-to-death--72879135</link><description><![CDATA[The 50-Year File: How a Government Watched Frank Hardy to Death<br /><br />A government file began with a man's first public speech and ended with his obituary folded into the last page - and it grew to be approximately fifty years thick without ever finding a crime. ASIO followed a celebrated Australian writer from a Speakers' Corner notebook entry in 1943 to the day his son first saw the file; why did surveillance persist when no offence was proved?<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the documented record kept by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and the moments it chose to record - from a 1943 public speech to a 1950 libel trial and beyond - asking what the file says about power, dissent, and the human cost of being watched.<br /><br />Person: Frank Hardy<br />Date of birth: 21 March 1917<br />First recorded speech: 13 June 1943 at Speakers' Corner, Melbourne<br />Book publication: Power Without Glory, 4 August 1950<br />Defence meeting: ~230 people at Ironworkers Hall, 188 George Street, November 1950<br /><br />- ASIO file began with a notebook entry recording Frank Hardy's public communist sympathies on 13 June 1943.<br />- Frank Hardy was 26 years old at the time of the first recorded speech in 1943.<br />- Power Without Glory was published on 4 August 1950 through a cooperative press after established publishers refused it.<br />- Approximately 230 people attended the Frank Hardy Defence Committee meeting at Ironworkers Hall in November 1950.<br />- ASIO requested the complete list of jurors who acquitted Hardy the week after his trial, despite the jury reaching a verdict in 17 minutes.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879135</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:46 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879135/0650.mp3" length="25359937" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The 50-Year File: How a Government Watched Frank Hardy to Death&#13;
&#13;
A government file began with a man's first public speech and ended with his obituary folded into the last page - and it grew to be approximately fifty years thick without ever finding...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The 50-Year File: How a Government Watched Frank Hardy to Death<br /><br />A government file began with a man's first public speech and ended with his obituary folded into the last page - and it grew to be approximately fifty years thick without ever finding a crime. ASIO followed a celebrated Australian writer from a Speakers' Corner notebook entry in 1943 to the day his son first saw the file; why did surveillance persist when no offence was proved?<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the documented record kept by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and the moments it chose to record - from a 1943 public speech to a 1950 libel trial and beyond - asking what the file says about power, dissent, and the human cost of being watched.<br /><br />Person: Frank Hardy<br />Date of birth: 21 March 1917<br />First recorded speech: 13 June 1943 at Speakers' Corner, Melbourne<br />Book publication: Power Without Glory, 4 August 1950<br />Defence meeting: ~230 people at Ironworkers Hall, 188 George Street, November 1950<br /><br />- ASIO file began with a notebook entry recording Frank Hardy's public communist sympathies on 13 June 1943.<br />- Frank Hardy was 26 years old at the time of the first recorded speech in 1943.<br />- Power Without Glory was published on 4 August 1950 through a cooperative press after established publishers refused it.<br />- Approximately 230 people attended the Frank Hardy Defence Committee meeting at Ironworkers Hall in November 1950.<br />- ASIO requested the complete list of jurors who acquitted Hardy the week after his trial, despite the jury reaching a verdict in 17 minutes.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1585</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Brought the Babies Home: The Man Who Kept Her Secret</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-brought-the-babies-home-the-man-who-kept-her-secret--72879134</link><description><![CDATA[He Brought the Babies Home: The Man Who Kept Her Secret<br /><br />On Christmas Eve 1998 a soaking wet Mitchell Qui pushed a buggy with two small children to his mother-in-law’s door, handed them over, and walked away into the dark-and six days later he reported his wife missing. Her body was found eighteen months later with head and hands never recovered, yet for fifty-three days after her death no one outside the house officially knew she was gone; who let that silence last so long?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from Lindsay Qui’s last sighting on 15 December 1998 through the fifty-three days before a social worker filed a missing persons report, and trace how Mitchell’s actions and explanations shaped what people believed; how did routine mornings and school runs mask a death in the home?<br /><br />Person: Lindsay Qui<br />Date: last seen 15 December 1998<br />Date: missing persons report filed 5 February 1999<br />Location: Southport, Lancashire<br />Status: body found after eighteen months; head and hands never recovered<br /><br />- Mitchell Qui returned on Christmas Eve 1998 without a coat, soaked and pushing a buggy with two small children.<br />- Lindsay was twenty-one years old when she was killed in the early hours of 16 December 1998.<br />- Lindsay’s body was not found for eighteen months after she was killed.<br />- For fifty-three days after her death, no one outside the house officially knew she was gone; the missing report was filed by a social worker on 5 February 1999.<br />- Lindsay’s father, Peter Wilson, placed a photograph of her in his window to force Mitchell to see her face when he passed.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879134</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879134/0649.mp3" length="25359519" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Brought the Babies Home: The Man Who Kept Her Secret&#13;
&#13;
On Christmas Eve 1998 a soaking wet Mitchell Qui pushed a buggy with two small children to his mother-in-law’s door, handed them over, and walked away into the dark-and six days later he...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Brought the Babies Home: The Man Who Kept Her Secret<br /><br />On Christmas Eve 1998 a soaking wet Mitchell Qui pushed a buggy with two small children to his mother-in-law’s door, handed them over, and walked away into the dark-and six days later he reported his wife missing. Her body was found eighteen months later with head and hands never recovered, yet for fifty-three days after her death no one outside the house officially knew she was gone; who let that silence last so long?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from Lindsay Qui’s last sighting on 15 December 1998 through the fifty-three days before a social worker filed a missing persons report, and trace how Mitchell’s actions and explanations shaped what people believed; how did routine mornings and school runs mask a death in the home?<br /><br />Person: Lindsay Qui<br />Date: last seen 15 December 1998<br />Date: missing persons report filed 5 February 1999<br />Location: Southport, Lancashire<br />Status: body found after eighteen months; head and hands never recovered<br /><br />- Mitchell Qui returned on Christmas Eve 1998 without a coat, soaked and pushing a buggy with two small children.<br />- Lindsay was twenty-one years old when she was killed in the early hours of 16 December 1998.<br />- Lindsay’s body was not found for eighteen months after she was killed.<br />- For fifty-three days after her death, no one outside the house officially knew she was gone; the missing report was filed by a social worker on 5 February 1999.<br />- Lindsay’s father, Peter Wilson, placed a photograph of her in his window to force Mitchell to see her face when he passed.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1585</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Quiet Man in the Dark: Norway's Night That Broke Innocence</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-quiet-man-in-the-dark-norway-s-night-that-broke-innocence--72879133</link><description><![CDATA[The Quiet Man in the Dark: Norway's Night That Broke Innocence<br /><br />A quiet man stood alone in a dark farmyard with a briefcase the night before seventy-seven people were killed - and the country that had never imagined such violence became the scene of the worst peacetime terrorist attack in Norway. How did months of hidden planning and a single still figure turn into an explosion heard up to eighty kilometers away?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what unfolded from a taxi ride on July 21, 2011 to the bombing and shootings the next day, laying out the movements, timelines, and actions that led to mass casualties and national shock. What was concealed in plain sight, and when did the warning signs become inevitable?<br /><br />Person: Anders Behring Breivik<br />Date: July 22, 2011<br />Location: Oslo and Utøya island<br />Event: Bombing in government quarter and mass shootings at summer camp<br />Witness: Pero Tengan (taxi driver)<br /><br />- Breivik stood in a farmyard two hours outside Oslo the evening of July 21, 2011, holding a briefcase and not entering the house.<br />- At 15:18 on July 22, 2011, a white van parked beside the government quarter and detonated nearly one ton of fertilizer-based explosive.<br />- Eight people died in Oslo from the explosion and more than eighty were injured that afternoon.<br />- The pressure wave from the bomb was reported heard at distances of seventy to eighty kilometers.<br />- Seventy-seven people were dead by the end of the attacks on July 22, 2011.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879133</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879133/0648.mp3" length="27099901" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Quiet Man in the Dark: Norway's Night That Broke Innocence&#13;
&#13;
A quiet man stood alone in a dark farmyard with a briefcase the night before seventy-seven people were killed - and the country that had never imagined such violence became the scene of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Quiet Man in the Dark: Norway's Night That Broke Innocence<br /><br />A quiet man stood alone in a dark farmyard with a briefcase the night before seventy-seven people were killed - and the country that had never imagined such violence became the scene of the worst peacetime terrorist attack in Norway. How did months of hidden planning and a single still figure turn into an explosion heard up to eighty kilometers away?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what unfolded from a taxi ride on July 21, 2011 to the bombing and shootings the next day, laying out the movements, timelines, and actions that led to mass casualties and national shock. What was concealed in plain sight, and when did the warning signs become inevitable?<br /><br />Person: Anders Behring Breivik<br />Date: July 22, 2011<br />Location: Oslo and Utøya island<br />Event: Bombing in government quarter and mass shootings at summer camp<br />Witness: Pero Tengan (taxi driver)<br /><br />- Breivik stood in a farmyard two hours outside Oslo the evening of July 21, 2011, holding a briefcase and not entering the house.<br />- At 15:18 on July 22, 2011, a white van parked beside the government quarter and detonated nearly one ton of fertilizer-based explosive.<br />- Eight people died in Oslo from the explosion and more than eighty were injured that afternoon.<br />- The pressure wave from the bomb was reported heard at distances of seventy to eighty kilometers.<br />- Seventy-seven people were dead by the end of the attacks on July 22, 2011.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1694</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The 17 Seconds That Shouldn't Have Happened: Tucson's Warning Signs</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-17-seconds-that-shouldn-t-have-happened-tucson-s-warning-signs--72879132</link><description><![CDATA[The 17 Seconds That Shouldn't Have Happened: Tucson's Warning Signs<br /><br />Cold January light, a grocery-store meet-and-greet, and seventeen seconds that left six dead and thirteen wounded-yet dozens of people had seen warning signs long before a motel room and a purchased weapon made the attack possible. How did suspensions, missed evaluations, and visible fear from classmates fail to stop a plan that had a timeline, a target, and ammunition bought weeks earlier?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened before, during, and immediately after those seventeen seconds at a Safeway on North Oracle Road, tracing the documented warnings from professors, classmates, family members, and the college to the morning Jared Lee Loughner walked up to a crowd. Could any single intervention have changed the outcome?<br /><br />Person: Jared Lee Loughner<br />Date of shooting: January 8, 2011<br />Location: Safeway on North Oracle Road, Tucson, Arizona<br />Deaths: 6<br />Wounded: 13<br /><br />- Jared Lee Loughner checked into Motel 6 room 411 at 12:29 AM on January 8, 2011.<br />- Loughner was 22 years old at the time of the shooting and born on September 10, 1988.<br />- Approximately 25 people were in line and 12 chairs had been set out at the Congress on Your Corner event.<br />- Giffords' aide Gabe Zimmerman was 29 years old and was among those killed.<br />- Pima Community College suspended Loughner and required documentation of a mental health evaluation for re-enrollment, which he never provided.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879132</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:35 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879132/0647.mp3" length="27394980" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The 17 Seconds That Shouldn't Have Happened: Tucson's Warning Signs&#13;
&#13;
Cold January light, a grocery-store meet-and-greet, and seventeen seconds that left six dead and thirteen wounded-yet dozens of people had seen warning signs long before a motel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The 17 Seconds That Shouldn't Have Happened: Tucson's Warning Signs<br /><br />Cold January light, a grocery-store meet-and-greet, and seventeen seconds that left six dead and thirteen wounded-yet dozens of people had seen warning signs long before a motel room and a purchased weapon made the attack possible. How did suspensions, missed evaluations, and visible fear from classmates fail to stop a plan that had a timeline, a target, and ammunition bought weeks earlier?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened before, during, and immediately after those seventeen seconds at a Safeway on North Oracle Road, tracing the documented warnings from professors, classmates, family members, and the college to the morning Jared Lee Loughner walked up to a crowd. Could any single intervention have changed the outcome?<br /><br />Person: Jared Lee Loughner<br />Date of shooting: January 8, 2011<br />Location: Safeway on North Oracle Road, Tucson, Arizona<br />Deaths: 6<br />Wounded: 13<br /><br />- Jared Lee Loughner checked into Motel 6 room 411 at 12:29 AM on January 8, 2011.<br />- Loughner was 22 years old at the time of the shooting and born on September 10, 1988.<br />- Approximately 25 people were in line and 12 chairs had been set out at the Congress on Your Corner event.<br />- Giffords' aide Gabe Zimmerman was 29 years old and was among those killed.<br />- Pima Community College suspended Loughner and required documentation of a mental health evaluation for re-enrollment, which he never provided.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1713</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Silent Sunflowers: Is Japan Hiding Van Gogh's Biggest Fake?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-silent-sunflowers-is-japan-hiding-van-gogh-s-biggest-fake--72879131</link><description><![CDATA[The Silent Sunflowers: Is Japan Hiding Van Gogh's Biggest Fake?<br /><br />The silence around a 22.5 million pound Sunflowers is louder than any signature: the painting has hung behind closed doors in Yasuda Fire and Marine Insurance's Tokyo offices since 1987, never opened to independent experts and relined on arrival - possibly destroying evidence. If Van Gogh mentioned two major Sunflowers in his letters and the Yasuda canvas is absent from the family inventory, how did it fetch a record-breaking price and why has no one answered whether it is real?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the 1945 loss of the only Van Gogh then in Japan through the 1987 Christie's sale, the relining in Tokyo, and the archival gap in Van Gogh's family records, asking whether institutional silence has protected a possible forgery or concealed another truth about provenance.<br /><br />Person: Yasuo Gotoh<br />Date: 1987 (sale) and 1945 (destruction of five-sunflowers painting)<br />Location: Tokyo offices of Yasuda Fire and Marine Insurance Company<br />Price: 22.5 million pounds<br />Subject: Sunflowers (fourteen sunflowers in a vase, oil on canvas)<br /><br />- The painting was purchased at Christie's in 1987 for 22.5 million pounds, nearly three times the previous world auction record.<br />- The canvas was relined upon arrival in Tokyo, a conservation step that can destroy paint chemistry and fiber evidence.<br />- Vincent van Gogh's surviving letters mention two major Sunflowers (London and Amsterdam); the Yasuda painting is not mentioned in hundreds of letters.<br />- The only Van Gogh on Japanese soil in 1945, a five-sunflowers work, was destroyed by American bombing raids.<br />- Yasuda's president issued a written statement refusing discussion: "We have no intention of participating in any discussion about the authenticity of Sunflowers."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879131</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879131/0646.mp3" length="29803261" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Silent Sunflowers: Is Japan Hiding Van Gogh's Biggest Fake?&#13;
&#13;
The silence around a 22.5 million pound Sunflowers is louder than any signature: the painting has hung behind closed doors in Yasuda Fire and Marine Insurance's Tokyo offices since...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Silent Sunflowers: Is Japan Hiding Van Gogh's Biggest Fake?<br /><br />The silence around a 22.5 million pound Sunflowers is louder than any signature: the painting has hung behind closed doors in Yasuda Fire and Marine Insurance's Tokyo offices since 1987, never opened to independent experts and relined on arrival - possibly destroying evidence. If Van Gogh mentioned two major Sunflowers in his letters and the Yasuda canvas is absent from the family inventory, how did it fetch a record-breaking price and why has no one answered whether it is real?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the 1945 loss of the only Van Gogh then in Japan through the 1987 Christie's sale, the relining in Tokyo, and the archival gap in Van Gogh's family records, asking whether institutional silence has protected a possible forgery or concealed another truth about provenance.<br /><br />Person: Yasuo Gotoh<br />Date: 1987 (sale) and 1945 (destruction of five-sunflowers painting)<br />Location: Tokyo offices of Yasuda Fire and Marine Insurance Company<br />Price: 22.5 million pounds<br />Subject: Sunflowers (fourteen sunflowers in a vase, oil on canvas)<br /><br />- The painting was purchased at Christie's in 1987 for 22.5 million pounds, nearly three times the previous world auction record.<br />- The canvas was relined upon arrival in Tokyo, a conservation step that can destroy paint chemistry and fiber evidence.<br />- Vincent van Gogh's surviving letters mention two major Sunflowers (London and Amsterdam); the Yasuda painting is not mentioned in hundreds of letters.<br />- The only Van Gogh on Japanese soil in 1945, a five-sunflowers work, was destroyed by American bombing raids.<br />- Yasuda's president issued a written statement refusing discussion: "We have no intention of participating in any discussion about the authenticity of Sunflowers."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1863</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Practiced Murder Like a Career - Inside Colin Ireland's Plan</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-practiced-murder-like-a-career-inside-colin-ireland-s-plan--72879130</link><description><![CDATA[He Practiced Murder Like a Career - Inside Colin Ireland's Plan<br /><br />He decided to become a serial killer as deliberately as someone sets a professional goal, and five men were dead before summer 1993. He studied a pub's subculture, learned its handkerchief code as a "passport," and used it to find victims - so how did planning and publicity shape each killing?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of how one man's resolution and methodical preparation led to five murders and a courtroom plea of guilty on December 20, 1993. We follow the steps he took to enter a community, choose victims, and treat murder like a career milestone - and ask what that calculation cost those five men.<br /><br />Person: Colin Ireland<br />Date: December 20, 1993<br />Location: Coleherne pub, Earl's Court; victims found in Whetstone and other locations<br />Event: Five counts of murder; guilty plea<br />Source: Robert Ressler's Whoever Fights Monsters<br /><br />- Born March 16, 1954, in Dartford, Kent, Colin Ireland resolved in early 1993 to become a serial killer.<br />- Ireland had between 30 and 50 court appearances for theft, burglary and deception before age 18, with no recorded grievous bodily harm.<br />- First victim Peter Walker, a theatre director, was murdered March 8, 1993; Ireland called the Samaritans and The Sun afterward.<br />- Second victim Christopher Dunn, age 37, was found naked, bound in a harness and killed by ligature strangulation on May 28, 1993; initially ruled accidental.<br />- Ireland learned the gay S&M handkerchief code and used it to attract victims at the Coleherne, describing the code as his "passport."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879130</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:28 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879130/0645.mp3" length="26002758" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Practiced Murder Like a Career - Inside Colin Ireland's Plan&#13;
&#13;
He decided to become a serial killer as deliberately as someone sets a professional goal, and five men were dead before summer 1993. He studied a pub's subculture, learned its...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Practiced Murder Like a Career - Inside Colin Ireland's Plan<br /><br />He decided to become a serial killer as deliberately as someone sets a professional goal, and five men were dead before summer 1993. He studied a pub's subculture, learned its handkerchief code as a "passport," and used it to find victims - so how did planning and publicity shape each killing?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of how one man's resolution and methodical preparation led to five murders and a courtroom plea of guilty on December 20, 1993. We follow the steps he took to enter a community, choose victims, and treat murder like a career milestone - and ask what that calculation cost those five men.<br /><br />Person: Colin Ireland<br />Date: December 20, 1993<br />Location: Coleherne pub, Earl's Court; victims found in Whetstone and other locations<br />Event: Five counts of murder; guilty plea<br />Source: Robert Ressler's Whoever Fights Monsters<br /><br />- Born March 16, 1954, in Dartford, Kent, Colin Ireland resolved in early 1993 to become a serial killer.<br />- Ireland had between 30 and 50 court appearances for theft, burglary and deception before age 18, with no recorded grievous bodily harm.<br />- First victim Peter Walker, a theatre director, was murdered March 8, 1993; Ireland called the Samaritans and The Sun afterward.<br />- Second victim Christopher Dunn, age 37, was found naked, bound in a harness and killed by ligature strangulation on May 28, 1993; initially ruled accidental.<br />- Ireland learned the gay S&M handkerchief code and used it to attract victims at the Coleherne, describing the code as his "passport."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1626</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Man Who Blended In: How Ipswich's Brook Revealed a Killer</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-man-who-blended-in-how-ipswich-s-brook-revealed-a-killer--72879129</link><description><![CDATA[The Man Who Blended In: How Ipswich's Brook Revealed a Killer<br /><br />The ordinary detail that broke the case was a man wading into a flooded brook at 11:44 a.m. and moving hair from what he thought was a mannequin - it was a 25‑year‑old woman. This episode centers on how everyday streets, CCTV, and a five‑year‑old DNA swab converged to expose a killer; what single thread pulled the whole investigation together?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the first discovery in December 2006 through the missing‑person reports and the traffic of London Road, showing how routine observations and existing records changed the investigation; how did a DNA match already in the national database become the turning point?<br /><br />Date: December 2, 2006<br />Person: Gemma Adams<br />Age: 25<br />Location: brook near Hintlesham, Suffolk<br />Event: discovery by gamekeeper Trevor at 11:44 a.m.<br /><br />- Trevor found Gemma Adams in a flooded brook and called police after moving hair from her face.<br />- Gemma Adams had been missing for just over two weeks when discovered on December 2, 2006.<br />- Steve Wright moved into a flat on London Road on October 1, 2006, and drove a dark blue Ford Mondeo Zetec.<br />- Wright had a DNA swab taken in 2001 after a theft arrest, entered into the national database.<br />- By early December 2006, Ipswich police had one confirmed dead woman and four missing women.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879129</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:24 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879129/0644.mp3" length="26568257" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Man Who Blended In: How Ipswich's Brook Revealed a Killer&#13;
&#13;
The ordinary detail that broke the case was a man wading into a flooded brook at 11:44 a.m. and moving hair from what he thought was a mannequin - it was a 25‑year‑old woman. This...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Man Who Blended In: How Ipswich's Brook Revealed a Killer<br /><br />The ordinary detail that broke the case was a man wading into a flooded brook at 11:44 a.m. and moving hair from what he thought was a mannequin - it was a 25‑year‑old woman. This episode centers on how everyday streets, CCTV, and a five‑year‑old DNA swab converged to expose a killer; what single thread pulled the whole investigation together?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the first discovery in December 2006 through the missing‑person reports and the traffic of London Road, showing how routine observations and existing records changed the investigation; how did a DNA match already in the national database become the turning point?<br /><br />Date: December 2, 2006<br />Person: Gemma Adams<br />Age: 25<br />Location: brook near Hintlesham, Suffolk<br />Event: discovery by gamekeeper Trevor at 11:44 a.m.<br /><br />- Trevor found Gemma Adams in a flooded brook and called police after moving hair from her face.<br />- Gemma Adams had been missing for just over two weeks when discovered on December 2, 2006.<br />- Steve Wright moved into a flat on London Road on October 1, 2006, and drove a dark blue Ford Mondeo Zetec.<br />- Wright had a DNA swab taken in 2001 after a theft arrest, entered into the national database.<br />- By early December 2006, Ipswich police had one confirmed dead woman and four missing women.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1661</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Disco Ball That Looked Safe - Two Children Went Up In Flames</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-disco-ball-that-looked-safe-two-children-went-up-in-flames--72879128</link><description><![CDATA[The Disco Ball That Looked Safe - Two Children Went Up In Flames<br /><br />A toy that looked perfectly legitimate - correct box, copied logo, bright packaging - was handed over at Chuck-E-Cheese and, within 24 hours, started a fire that killed two children. The fire marshal later identified the electrical connection of the disco ball as the ignition point, but early investigators first blamed a CD player; which version tells the whole truth?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from a fifth birthday at Chuck-E-Cheese to the morning Rob Bullock received a call at approximately six fifteen, laying out the conflicting investigation steps and the unanswered question about how the toy was actually powered when the blaze began.<br /><br />Person: Rob Bullock<br />Event: House fire that killed two children<br />Location: children's bedroom (dollhouse upper floor)<br />Date: call received at approximately six fifteen in the morning<br />Source of ignition: electrical connection of the disco ball (later fire marshal conclusion)<br /><br />- Alyssa Bullock turned five and chose a rotating, light-up disco ball as a prize at Chuck-E-Cheese the night before the fire.<br />- The disco ball had been in the Bullock home for less than twenty-four hours when the fire began.<br />- Rob received a call from the sheriff at approximately 6:15 AM the morning of the fire.<br />- The fire marshal ultimately located the ignition point at the electrical connection where the disco ball had been plugged in on top of the dollhouse.<br />- Initial investigation working hypothesis blamed a CD player before later shifting the origin to the disco ball's outlet connection.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879128</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:21 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879128/0643.mp3" length="18065295" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Disco Ball That Looked Safe - Two Children Went Up In Flames&#13;
&#13;
A toy that looked perfectly legitimate - correct box, copied logo, bright packaging - was handed over at Chuck-E-Cheese and, within 24 hours, started a fire that killed two children....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Disco Ball That Looked Safe - Two Children Went Up In Flames<br /><br />A toy that looked perfectly legitimate - correct box, copied logo, bright packaging - was handed over at Chuck-E-Cheese and, within 24 hours, started a fire that killed two children. The fire marshal later identified the electrical connection of the disco ball as the ignition point, but early investigators first blamed a CD player; which version tells the whole truth?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from a fifth birthday at Chuck-E-Cheese to the morning Rob Bullock received a call at approximately six fifteen, laying out the conflicting investigation steps and the unanswered question about how the toy was actually powered when the blaze began.<br /><br />Person: Rob Bullock<br />Event: House fire that killed two children<br />Location: children's bedroom (dollhouse upper floor)<br />Date: call received at approximately six fifteen in the morning<br />Source of ignition: electrical connection of the disco ball (later fire marshal conclusion)<br /><br />- Alyssa Bullock turned five and chose a rotating, light-up disco ball as a prize at Chuck-E-Cheese the night before the fire.<br />- The disco ball had been in the Bullock home for less than twenty-four hours when the fire began.<br />- Rob received a call from the sheriff at approximately 6:15 AM the morning of the fire.<br />- The fire marshal ultimately located the ignition point at the electrical connection where the disco ball had been plugged in on top of the dollhouse.<br />- Initial investigation working hypothesis blamed a CD player before later shifting the origin to the disco ball's outlet connection.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1130</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Baker's Knife: When Ordinary Kitchens Become Killing Fields</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-baker-s-knife-when-ordinary-kitchens-become-killing-fields--72879126</link><description><![CDATA[The Baker's Knife: When Ordinary Kitchens Become Killing Fields<br /><br />A kitchen knife pulled from a pocket in under two seconds becomes the clearest image of a city where bread shops and bakers’ counters sit beside sudden death; in one year fifty-nine young people were killed violently across the United Kingdom and a sixteen-year-old named Jimmy Mizen was the twenty-sixth to die that year. How does a household utensil turn into a weapon that travels from kitchen drawers into the streets, and why didn't the knife amnesty stop the killings?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of where ordinary places and ordinary objects meet lethal violence, following victims, neighbors and official crime data to ask whether removal of weapons can break a cycle that feels structural rather than random. Can community measures and police interventions change the operating logic of territories where postal codes function as borders?<br /><br />Person: Jimmy Mizen<br />Age: 16<br />Location: Tooting, Wandsworth, South London<br />Knives collected in two weeks: nearly 200<br />London violent crimes in 12 months: 218,000<br /><br />- Fifty-nine young people were killed violently across the United Kingdom in one year.<br />- Jimmy Mizen was the twenty-sixth young person killed that year.<br />- More than 5,000 violent attacks were recorded in Tooting in the twelve months before the story.<br />- Scotland Yard data showed London had 218,000 violent crimes in twelve months, about one every 2.5 minutes.<br />- The Metropolitan Police collected nearly 200 knives and weapons from young people within two weeks of knife amnesty bins appearing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879126</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879126/0642.mp3" length="23389259" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Baker's Knife: When Ordinary Kitchens Become Killing Fields&#13;
&#13;
A kitchen knife pulled from a pocket in under two seconds becomes the clearest image of a city where bread shops and bakers’ counters sit beside sudden death; in one year fifty-nine...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Baker's Knife: When Ordinary Kitchens Become Killing Fields<br /><br />A kitchen knife pulled from a pocket in under two seconds becomes the clearest image of a city where bread shops and bakers’ counters sit beside sudden death; in one year fifty-nine young people were killed violently across the United Kingdom and a sixteen-year-old named Jimmy Mizen was the twenty-sixth to die that year. How does a household utensil turn into a weapon that travels from kitchen drawers into the streets, and why didn't the knife amnesty stop the killings?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of where ordinary places and ordinary objects meet lethal violence, following victims, neighbors and official crime data to ask whether removal of weapons can break a cycle that feels structural rather than random. Can community measures and police interventions change the operating logic of territories where postal codes function as borders?<br /><br />Person: Jimmy Mizen<br />Age: 16<br />Location: Tooting, Wandsworth, South London<br />Knives collected in two weeks: nearly 200<br />London violent crimes in 12 months: 218,000<br /><br />- Fifty-nine young people were killed violently across the United Kingdom in one year.<br />- Jimmy Mizen was the twenty-sixth young person killed that year.<br />- More than 5,000 violent attacks were recorded in Tooting in the twelve months before the story.<br />- Scotland Yard data showed London had 218,000 violent crimes in twelve months, about one every 2.5 minutes.<br />- The Metropolitan Police collected nearly 200 knives and weapons from young people within two weeks of knife amnesty bins appearing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1462</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Never Held the Knife - How He Made Them Kill</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-never-held-the-knife-how-he-made-them-kill--72879125</link><description><![CDATA[He Never Held the Knife - How He Made Them Kill<br /><br />Fear and controlled dread start on the first line: seven murders committed over two nights in August 1969 in Los Angeles, with a man convicted who often never touched the knife and killers who later wept for him - how does someone rebuild a person’s mind until they become willing instruments of murder? What exactly did he do to take people apart and remake them into killers?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the Cielo Drive murders and the people around Charles Manson, laying out scene details, backgrounds, and witness accounts that raise the central question: how were ordinary-seeming individuals transformed into participants in calculated violence?<br /><br />Date: August 1969<br />Location: Los Angeles<br />Case: Cielo Drive murders<br />Person: Charles Manson<br />Victims: Five killed at Cielo Drive (plus two other victims that same period)<br /><br />- The telephone wires at Cielo Drive were cut before anyone arrived, a deliberate action indicating premeditation.<br />- Five people were dead at Cielo Drive by morning: Sharon Tate (26, eight and a half months pregnant), Jay Sebring, Abigail Folger (25), Voytek Frykowski, and Steven Parent (18).<br />- Steven Parent was found in his car in the driveway, shot while leaving after visiting the property’s caretaker.<br />- Charles Manson was born in 1934 and had spent more than half of his life in juvenile facilities, reform schools, and federal prisons before release from Terminal Island in 1967.<br />- Susan Atkins (renamed Sadie by Manson) later stated Manson had absolute control of her thoughts and believed he could read her mind.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879125</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879125/0641.mp3" length="26855395" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Never Held the Knife - How He Made Them Kill&#13;
&#13;
Fear and controlled dread start on the first line: seven murders committed over two nights in August 1969 in Los Angeles, with a man convicted who often never touched the knife and killers who later...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Never Held the Knife - How He Made Them Kill<br /><br />Fear and controlled dread start on the first line: seven murders committed over two nights in August 1969 in Los Angeles, with a man convicted who often never touched the knife and killers who later wept for him - how does someone rebuild a person’s mind until they become willing instruments of murder? What exactly did he do to take people apart and remake them into killers?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the Cielo Drive murders and the people around Charles Manson, laying out scene details, backgrounds, and witness accounts that raise the central question: how were ordinary-seeming individuals transformed into participants in calculated violence?<br /><br />Date: August 1969<br />Location: Los Angeles<br />Case: Cielo Drive murders<br />Person: Charles Manson<br />Victims: Five killed at Cielo Drive (plus two other victims that same period)<br /><br />- The telephone wires at Cielo Drive were cut before anyone arrived, a deliberate action indicating premeditation.<br />- Five people were dead at Cielo Drive by morning: Sharon Tate (26, eight and a half months pregnant), Jay Sebring, Abigail Folger (25), Voytek Frykowski, and Steven Parent (18).<br />- Steven Parent was found in his car in the driveway, shot while leaving after visiting the property’s caretaker.<br />- Charles Manson was born in 1934 and had spent more than half of his life in juvenile facilities, reform schools, and federal prisons before release from Terminal Island in 1967.<br />- Susan Atkins (renamed Sadie by Manson) later stated Manson had absolute control of her thoughts and believed he could read her mind.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1679</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Envelope of Hope: When Fake Colleges Devoured Dreams</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-envelope-of-hope-when-fake-colleges-devoured-dreams--72879124</link><description><![CDATA[The Envelope of Hope: When Fake Colleges Devoured Dreams<br /><br />They saved every rand for two months and handed over an envelope that paid the registration fee at a college that offered four-week courses, job placement guaranteed, and a fully equipped kitchen that investigators never saw - so who were these schools really preying on? In a Johannesburg where a newspaper advertisement could mean the difference between hunger and a job, families paid 380 rand to register and were left with certificates that employers ignored; what happened to those promises?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the stories of people who paid for training and placement they never received, trace how legal gaps allowed hundreds of private colleges to operate unregistered, and ask what a single advertisement could cost a family struggling to survive.<br /><br />Person: Puseletso<br />Person: Nombeko Makana<br />Location: Johannesburg<br />Date: January 1, 2004 (registration deadline set)<br />Case: Loritz Training College / Lorette / Lories<br /><br />- Family saved for two months to pay a 380 rand registration fee at Loritz Training College.<br />- Loritz charged 150 rand for a uniform and equipment in addition to the 380 rand registration.<br />- More than 900 private colleges were operating across South Africa while exempt from registration.<br />- Between 1996 and the investigation, fewer than 15 students from Loritz sat the single City and Guilds IT examination the college claimed to offer.<br />- Nombeko paid 280 rand for tuition and 250 rand for accommodation, then was charged 550 rand for a single-room dorm shared by 16 students.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879124</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:10 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879124/0640.mp3" length="28756691" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Envelope of Hope: When Fake Colleges Devoured Dreams&#13;
&#13;
They saved every rand for two months and handed over an envelope that paid the registration fee at a college that offered four-week courses, job placement guaranteed, and a fully equipped...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Envelope of Hope: When Fake Colleges Devoured Dreams<br /><br />They saved every rand for two months and handed over an envelope that paid the registration fee at a college that offered four-week courses, job placement guaranteed, and a fully equipped kitchen that investigators never saw - so who were these schools really preying on? In a Johannesburg where a newspaper advertisement could mean the difference between hunger and a job, families paid 380 rand to register and were left with certificates that employers ignored; what happened to those promises?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the stories of people who paid for training and placement they never received, trace how legal gaps allowed hundreds of private colleges to operate unregistered, and ask what a single advertisement could cost a family struggling to survive.<br /><br />Person: Puseletso<br />Person: Nombeko Makana<br />Location: Johannesburg<br />Date: January 1, 2004 (registration deadline set)<br />Case: Loritz Training College / Lorette / Lories<br /><br />- Family saved for two months to pay a 380 rand registration fee at Loritz Training College.<br />- Loritz charged 150 rand for a uniform and equipment in addition to the 380 rand registration.<br />- More than 900 private colleges were operating across South Africa while exempt from registration.<br />- Between 1996 and the investigation, fewer than 15 students from Loritz sat the single City and Guilds IT examination the college claimed to offer.<br />- Nombeko paid 280 rand for tuition and 250 rand for accommodation, then was charged 550 rand for a single-room dorm shared by 16 students.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1798</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Night a Prison Lie Unleashed a Gunman's Hunt</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-night-a-prison-lie-unleashed-a-gunman-s-hunt--72879123</link><description><![CDATA[The Night a Prison Lie Unleashed a Gunman's Hunt<br /><br />A single lie told in a prison visiting room rerouted a grudge into a weeklong manhunt that left one man dead, one officer blinded, and a riverside standoff beneath a sawn-off shotgun. How did a false claim about a boyfriend’s job morph into a targeted campaign against anyone in a police uniform?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from the moment Raoul Thomas Moat left HM Prison Durham through the shootings in Blyth and on the A1, and the six-hour riverbank siege that ended at 1:12 a.m. on July 10, 2010 - how one prison visit lie redirected violence and why warnings failed to reach officers in time.<br /><br />Person: Raoul Thomas Moat<br />Date: 1 July 2010 (release), 3 July 2010 (Blyth shootings), 4 July 2010 (A1 shooting), 10 July 2010 (riverbank standoff)<br />Location: Blyth; A1 near Denton Burn interchange; River Coquet in Rothbury, Northumberland<br />Weapon: Modified sawn-off shotgun, used three times in seven days<br />Victims: Christopher Brown (dead), Samantha Stobart (wounded), PC David Rathband (shot twice in the face)<br /><br />- Moat was released from HM Prison Durham at 11:00 a.m. on 1 July 2010 after serving just over two months of a sixteen-week sentence.<br />- On the early hours of 3 July 2010, Moat fired three times at close range, killing Christopher Brown and wounding Samantha Stobart.<br />- At 00:29 on 4 July 2010 Moat called Northumbria Police, confessed to the killing, declared war on the force, then hung up; the call was recorded.<br />- Sixteen minutes after that call, PC David Rathband was shot twice in the face on the A1 near Denton Burn while unaware the suspect had changed vehicles.<br />- At 1:12 a.m. on 10 July 2010 a six-hour negotiation ended with a man kneeling on the bank of the River Coquet in Rothbury with a sawn-off shotgun pressed beneath his chin and more than five hundred armed officers surrounding the area.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879123</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879123/0639.mp3" length="24233955" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Night a Prison Lie Unleashed a Gunman's Hunt&#13;
&#13;
A single lie told in a prison visiting room rerouted a grudge into a weeklong manhunt that left one man dead, one officer blinded, and a riverside standoff beneath a sawn-off shotgun. How did a false...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Night a Prison Lie Unleashed a Gunman's Hunt<br /><br />A single lie told in a prison visiting room rerouted a grudge into a weeklong manhunt that left one man dead, one officer blinded, and a riverside standoff beneath a sawn-off shotgun. How did a false claim about a boyfriend’s job morph into a targeted campaign against anyone in a police uniform?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from the moment Raoul Thomas Moat left HM Prison Durham through the shootings in Blyth and on the A1, and the six-hour riverbank siege that ended at 1:12 a.m. on July 10, 2010 - how one prison visit lie redirected violence and why warnings failed to reach officers in time.<br /><br />Person: Raoul Thomas Moat<br />Date: 1 July 2010 (release), 3 July 2010 (Blyth shootings), 4 July 2010 (A1 shooting), 10 July 2010 (riverbank standoff)<br />Location: Blyth; A1 near Denton Burn interchange; River Coquet in Rothbury, Northumberland<br />Weapon: Modified sawn-off shotgun, used three times in seven days<br />Victims: Christopher Brown (dead), Samantha Stobart (wounded), PC David Rathband (shot twice in the face)<br /><br />- Moat was released from HM Prison Durham at 11:00 a.m. on 1 July 2010 after serving just over two months of a sixteen-week sentence.<br />- On the early hours of 3 July 2010, Moat fired three times at close range, killing Christopher Brown and wounding Samantha Stobart.<br />- At 00:29 on 4 July 2010 Moat called Northumbria Police, confessed to the killing, declared war on the force, then hung up; the call was recorded.<br />- Sixteen minutes after that call, PC David Rathband was shot twice in the face on the A1 near Denton Burn while unaware the suspect had changed vehicles.<br />- At 1:12 a.m. on 10 July 2010 a six-hour negotiation ended with a man kneeling on the bank of the River Coquet in Rothbury with a sawn-off shotgun pressed beneath his chin and more than five hundred armed officers surrounding the area.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1515</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Believed He Was God's Thirteenth - The Santa Cruz Sacrifice</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-believed-he-was-god-s-thirteenth-the-santa-cruz-sacrifice--72879122</link><description><![CDATA[He Believed He Was God's Thirteenth - The Santa Cruz Sacrifice<br /><br />He believed California would sink unless someone stopped it, and he marked April 18th - his birthday, Einstein’s death, and the 1906 earthquake - as proof. On October 13, 1972, at age 25, Herbert William Mullin picked up a baseball bat and began a killing spree he said was sacred; what made him stop being unseen and ordinary enough to be believed?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Mullin’s San Lorenzo Valley childhood and high school yearbook to the Tenderloin manuscripts where he mapped a theology of sacrifice, and we trace how a string of seemingly accidental deaths became a coherent confession that convinced a jury of his sanity. How did a promising young man become convinced murder would save the state?<br /><br />Person: Herbert William Mullin<br />Date: April 18, 1947 (birth)<br />Event: First killing on October 13, 1972<br />Location: San Lorenzo Valley and Santa Cruz area, California<br />Investigator: Detective Terry Medina<br /><br />- Mullin was 25 years old when he beat Lawrence White to death on October 13, 1972.<br />- Mullin’s birth time was recorded as six minutes past six in the morning on April 18, 1947.<br />- Mullin’s yearbook named him "most likely to succeed" in 1965 at San Lorenzo Valley High School.<br />- Investigators found hundreds of handwritten pages in a Tenderloin hotel basement outlining Mullin’s belief in the “thirteenth” apostle and sacrificial logic.<br />- The jury deliberated three days before returning a verdict that Mullin was sane.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879122</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:51:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879122/0638.mp3" length="28431101" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Believed He Was God's Thirteenth - The Santa Cruz Sacrifice&#13;
&#13;
He believed California would sink unless someone stopped it, and he marked April 18th - his birthday, Einstein’s death, and the 1906 earthquake - as proof. On October 13, 1972, at age...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Believed He Was God's Thirteenth - The Santa Cruz Sacrifice<br /><br />He believed California would sink unless someone stopped it, and he marked April 18th - his birthday, Einstein’s death, and the 1906 earthquake - as proof. On October 13, 1972, at age 25, Herbert William Mullin picked up a baseball bat and began a killing spree he said was sacred; what made him stop being unseen and ordinary enough to be believed?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from Mullin’s San Lorenzo Valley childhood and high school yearbook to the Tenderloin manuscripts where he mapped a theology of sacrifice, and we trace how a string of seemingly accidental deaths became a coherent confession that convinced a jury of his sanity. How did a promising young man become convinced murder would save the state?<br /><br />Person: Herbert William Mullin<br />Date: April 18, 1947 (birth)<br />Event: First killing on October 13, 1972<br />Location: San Lorenzo Valley and Santa Cruz area, California<br />Investigator: Detective Terry Medina<br /><br />- Mullin was 25 years old when he beat Lawrence White to death on October 13, 1972.<br />- Mullin’s birth time was recorded as six minutes past six in the morning on April 18, 1947.<br />- Mullin’s yearbook named him "most likely to succeed" in 1965 at San Lorenzo Valley High School.<br />- Investigators found hundreds of handwritten pages in a Tenderloin hotel basement outlining Mullin’s belief in the “thirteenth” apostle and sacrificial logic.<br />- The jury deliberated three days before returning a verdict that Mullin was sane.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1777</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Closet Full of Lottery Letters: How Hope Fueled a $20M Scam</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-closet-full-of-lottery-letters-how-hope-fueled-a-20m-scam--72879121</link><description><![CDATA[The Closet Full of Lottery Letters: How Hope Fueled a $20M Scam<br /><br />Hope became currency: a 91-year-old woman kept four years of hand-dated, month-stacked lottery envelopes in a closet while tens of thousands of similar victims sent money that added up to over twenty million dollars; not a single ticket was ever bought - how did one operation turn disciplined hope into a $20M machine?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how James Ray Houston built mailings that looked legitimate, how defendants like Dennis Emmett described their roles, and how investigators from the Postal Inspection Service and IRS followed bank records to uncover a single account receiving checks for multiple fake lotteries - what made the scheme so durable and who kept it running?<br /><br />Person: James Ray Houston<br />Person: Dennis Emmett<br />Person: Postal Inspector Cheri Delaney<br />Person: IRS Agent Timothy Nugent<br />Amount: over twenty million dollars<br /><br />- A 91-year-old woman organized four years of lottery letters by hand and stacked them by month in a closet.<br />- The entry fee printed on solicitations was three dollars per mailing.<br />- Dennis Emmett estimated an initial response rate of roughly ten percent for the three-dollar postcard.<br />- Investigators found one bank account receiving checks made out to at least five different lottery names.<br />- Emmett stated that roughly seventy-five to eighty percent of the people who kept playing were "a little slow or not on the ball."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879121</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:58 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879121/0637.mp3" length="22117828" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Closet Full of Lottery Letters: How Hope Fueled a $20M Scam&#13;
&#13;
Hope became currency: a 91-year-old woman kept four years of hand-dated, month-stacked lottery envelopes in a closet while tens of thousands of similar victims sent money that added up...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Closet Full of Lottery Letters: How Hope Fueled a $20M Scam<br /><br />Hope became currency: a 91-year-old woman kept four years of hand-dated, month-stacked lottery envelopes in a closet while tens of thousands of similar victims sent money that added up to over twenty million dollars; not a single ticket was ever bought - how did one operation turn disciplined hope into a $20M machine?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how James Ray Houston built mailings that looked legitimate, how defendants like Dennis Emmett described their roles, and how investigators from the Postal Inspection Service and IRS followed bank records to uncover a single account receiving checks for multiple fake lotteries - what made the scheme so durable and who kept it running?<br /><br />Person: James Ray Houston<br />Person: Dennis Emmett<br />Person: Postal Inspector Cheri Delaney<br />Person: IRS Agent Timothy Nugent<br />Amount: over twenty million dollars<br /><br />- A 91-year-old woman organized four years of lottery letters by hand and stacked them by month in a closet.<br />- The entry fee printed on solicitations was three dollars per mailing.<br />- Dennis Emmett estimated an initial response rate of roughly ten percent for the three-dollar postcard.<br />- Investigators found one bank account receiving checks made out to at least five different lottery names.<br />- Emmett stated that roughly seventy-five to eighty percent of the people who kept playing were "a little slow or not on the ball."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1383</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Walked Into the Police Station - She Blocked the Door Pregnant</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-walked-into-the-police-station-she-blocked-the-door-pregnant--72879118</link><description><![CDATA[He Walked Into the Police Station - She Blocked the Door Pregnant<br /><br />A well-dressed man walked into a police station unannounced to ask about a fraud investigation he had started, and within minutes the detective realized he wasn't there to confess but to see how much they knew. Seven months pregnant, Natasha physically blocked a door because she feared he would disappear - and he did; what followed revealed a patient, repeated system of theft that used her name and left her family over half a million dollars in debt. How did a seemingly trustworthy man build and run a fraud architecture that relied on time, trust, and someone else's identity?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the relationship, the business, and the fraud as they unfolded: how Kent constructed a biography, how Natasha's name came to run through every registration and account, and how the scheme converted months of stored card data into single-night cashouts. What did the pattern of repeated business registrations and mass charge batches reveal about his method?<br /><br />Person: Jeff Kent<br />Person: Natasha<br />Event: Marriage roughly four months after proposal<br />Business: Online hotel reservation platform with five separate business names<br />Debt: Natasha's family debt exceeded $500,000<br /><br />- Kent proposed roughly four months into the relationship.<br />- Five separate business names were registered for the online booking operation.<br />- Peak daily reported sales reached $50,000.<br />- Single cashouts ranged between $100,000 and $300,000.<br />- Natasha was seven months pregnant when she blocked the door to keep Kent from leaving.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879118</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879118/0636.mp3" length="23890393" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Walked Into the Police Station - She Blocked the Door Pregnant&#13;
&#13;
A well-dressed man walked into a police station unannounced to ask about a fraud investigation he had started, and within minutes the detective realized he wasn't there to confess...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Walked Into the Police Station - She Blocked the Door Pregnant<br /><br />A well-dressed man walked into a police station unannounced to ask about a fraud investigation he had started, and within minutes the detective realized he wasn't there to confess but to see how much they knew. Seven months pregnant, Natasha physically blocked a door because she feared he would disappear - and he did; what followed revealed a patient, repeated system of theft that used her name and left her family over half a million dollars in debt. How did a seemingly trustworthy man build and run a fraud architecture that relied on time, trust, and someone else's identity?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the relationship, the business, and the fraud as they unfolded: how Kent constructed a biography, how Natasha's name came to run through every registration and account, and how the scheme converted months of stored card data into single-night cashouts. What did the pattern of repeated business registrations and mass charge batches reveal about his method?<br /><br />Person: Jeff Kent<br />Person: Natasha<br />Event: Marriage roughly four months after proposal<br />Business: Online hotel reservation platform with five separate business names<br />Debt: Natasha's family debt exceeded $500,000<br /><br />- Kent proposed roughly four months into the relationship.<br />- Five separate business names were registered for the online booking operation.<br />- Peak daily reported sales reached $50,000.<br />- Single cashouts ranged between $100,000 and $300,000.<br />- Natasha was seven months pregnant when she blocked the door to keep Kent from leaving.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1494</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Thirty-Two Witnesses, One Bullet: The Krays' Silent Terror</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/thirty-two-witnesses-one-bullet-the-krays-silent-terror--72879117</link><description><![CDATA[Thirty-Two Witnesses, One Bullet: The Krays' Silent Terror<br /><br />A crowded pub, a single unmistakable shot, and thirty-two people who walked out and kept their mouths shut - a silence that protected two brothers and terrified a neighborhood. What does it take for an entire community to choose not to tell the truth, and how did the Krays turn fear into a social code?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the night of March 9, 1966, at the Blind Beggar on Whitechapel Road when Ronnie Kray shot George Cornell at point-blank range and thirty-two witnesses saw it happen. We trace the twins’ rise from Hoxton boxers to West End figures, the culture of loyalty and terror they built, and the moment a woman begged Detective Nipper Read for protection - a moment that helps explain the silence.<br /><br />Date: March 9, 1966<br />Location: Blind Beggar, Whitechapel Road, East End of London<br />Persons: Ronnie Kray, Reggie Kray, George Cornell, Albie Woods, Frances Shea<br />Event: Shooting of George Cornell<br /><br />- 32 people were inside the Blind Beggar pub when George Cornell was shot.<br />- The shooting occurred at exactly 8:10 PM while the jukebox played "The Sun Ain't Gonna Shine Anymore."<br />- Ronnie Kray fired one Luger automatic pistol shot through George Cornell’s forehead at close range.<br />- Ronnie and Reggie Kray were born in Hoxton in 1933 and were trained boxers by their teens.<br />- Scotland Yard had been watching the Kray twins since July 196? (investigation start referenced in transcript).<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879117</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:52 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879117/0635.mp3" length="27876051" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Thirty-Two Witnesses, One Bullet: The Krays' Silent Terror&#13;
&#13;
A crowded pub, a single unmistakable shot, and thirty-two people who walked out and kept their mouths shut - a silence that protected two brothers and terrified a neighborhood. What does it...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Thirty-Two Witnesses, One Bullet: The Krays' Silent Terror<br /><br />A crowded pub, a single unmistakable shot, and thirty-two people who walked out and kept their mouths shut - a silence that protected two brothers and terrified a neighborhood. What does it take for an entire community to choose not to tell the truth, and how did the Krays turn fear into a social code?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the night of March 9, 1966, at the Blind Beggar on Whitechapel Road when Ronnie Kray shot George Cornell at point-blank range and thirty-two witnesses saw it happen. We trace the twins’ rise from Hoxton boxers to West End figures, the culture of loyalty and terror they built, and the moment a woman begged Detective Nipper Read for protection - a moment that helps explain the silence.<br /><br />Date: March 9, 1966<br />Location: Blind Beggar, Whitechapel Road, East End of London<br />Persons: Ronnie Kray, Reggie Kray, George Cornell, Albie Woods, Frances Shea<br />Event: Shooting of George Cornell<br /><br />- 32 people were inside the Blind Beggar pub when George Cornell was shot.<br />- The shooting occurred at exactly 8:10 PM while the jukebox played "The Sun Ain't Gonna Shine Anymore."<br />- Ronnie Kray fired one Luger automatic pistol shot through George Cornell’s forehead at close range.<br />- Ronnie and Reggie Kray were born in Hoxton in 1933 and were trained boxers by their teens.<br />- Scotland Yard had been watching the Kray twins since July 196? (investigation start referenced in transcript).<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1743</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Voice on the Tape: Myra Hindley's Calm as Lesley Pleaded</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-voice-on-the-tape-myra-hindley-s-calm-as-lesley-pleaded--72879115</link><description><![CDATA[The Voice on the Tape: Myra Hindley's Calm as Lesley Pleaded<br /><br />A child's sobs fill a sixteen-minute recording while a calm adult voice orders her to be quiet - the voice later identified as Myra Hindley. That tape survived; the ten-year-old, Lesley Ann Downey, did not. How could someone who planned and chose act with such composed detachment as a child begged for her mother?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events recorded in police files and survivor accounts, from the first disappearances on Saddleworth Moor to the moment a terrified teenager's call to the police ended the killings. What does the tape, the diary entries, and the chronology of abductions reveal about who decided when the violence began?<br /><br />Person: Myra Hindley<br />Person: Ian Brady<br />Victim: Lesley Ann Downey<br />Date: 7 October 1965<br />Location: Hattersley<br /><br />- The recording of Lesley Ann Downey runs for sixteen minutes while she cries and pleads for her mother.<br />- Lesley Ann Downey was ten years old when she was taken from a fairground in Manchester.<br />- On 7 October 1965, seventeen-year-old David Smith witnessed Ian Brady beat Edward Evans to death with an axe handle.<br />- Pauline Reade was sixteen and vanished on 23 July 1963 after being offered a lift by Myra Hindley; her body was not found for more than twenty years.<br />- John Kilbride, age eleven (almost twelve), disappeared in November 1963 and his body was found in autumn 1965.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879115</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:48 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879115/0634.mp3" length="28095480" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Voice on the Tape: Myra Hindley's Calm as Lesley Pleaded&#13;
&#13;
A child's sobs fill a sixteen-minute recording while a calm adult voice orders her to be quiet - the voice later identified as Myra Hindley. That tape survived; the ten-year-old, Lesley...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Voice on the Tape: Myra Hindley's Calm as Lesley Pleaded<br /><br />A child's sobs fill a sixteen-minute recording while a calm adult voice orders her to be quiet - the voice later identified as Myra Hindley. That tape survived; the ten-year-old, Lesley Ann Downey, did not. How could someone who planned and chose act with such composed detachment as a child begged for her mother?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events recorded in police files and survivor accounts, from the first disappearances on Saddleworth Moor to the moment a terrified teenager's call to the police ended the killings. What does the tape, the diary entries, and the chronology of abductions reveal about who decided when the violence began?<br /><br />Person: Myra Hindley<br />Person: Ian Brady<br />Victim: Lesley Ann Downey<br />Date: 7 October 1965<br />Location: Hattersley<br /><br />- The recording of Lesley Ann Downey runs for sixteen minutes while she cries and pleads for her mother.<br />- Lesley Ann Downey was ten years old when she was taken from a fairground in Manchester.<br />- On 7 October 1965, seventeen-year-old David Smith witnessed Ian Brady beat Edward Evans to death with an axe handle.<br />- Pauline Reade was sixteen and vanished on 23 July 1963 after being offered a lift by Myra Hindley; her body was not found for more than twenty years.<br />- John Kilbride, age eleven (almost twelve), disappeared in November 1963 and his body was found in autumn 1965.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1756</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The School Gates, the Note, and the Killer Who Was Fourteen</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-school-gates-the-note-and-the-killer-who-was-fourteen--72879114</link><description><![CDATA[The School Gates, the Note, and the Killer Who Was Fourteen<br /><br />The morning an eleven-year-old's severed head was found at the school gates in Kobe, a handwritten note tucked in his mouth declared "I desperately want to see people die" and ended: "Now the game begins." The brutality suggested an experienced adult and forced an entire city into a panic - but the truth that unspooled challenged every assumption. Who could have written those words and staged that message?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Jun Hase and the response to the crime that shocked Kobe in 1997, following the discovery, the note, and the investigative choices that were made under the conviction the perpetrator was an adult. How did that conviction shape the hunt, and what happened when it proved to be wrong?<br /><br />Person: Jun Hase<br />Age: 11<br />Date: 1997<br />Location: Kobe<br />Event: severed head found at school gates<br /><br />- The victim, Jun Hase, was eleven years old when his severed head was placed at the entrance gates of a school.<br />- The handwritten note found inside Jun's mouth read: "I desperately want to see people die. Nothing makes me more excited than killing. Now the game begins."<br />- Investigators initially assumed the perpetrator was an adult based on the deliberate staging and tone of the note.<br />- Kobe had been rebuilding after the 1995 Great Hanshin earthquake two years earlier, a context mentioned during the investigation.<br />- The police belief that the crime reflected experience and organization guided the early weeks of the search.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879114</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:44 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879114/0633.mp3" length="22267039" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The School Gates, the Note, and the Killer Who Was Fourteen&#13;
&#13;
The morning an eleven-year-old's severed head was found at the school gates in Kobe, a handwritten note tucked in his mouth declared "I desperately want to see people die" and ended: "Now...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The School Gates, the Note, and the Killer Who Was Fourteen<br /><br />The morning an eleven-year-old's severed head was found at the school gates in Kobe, a handwritten note tucked in his mouth declared "I desperately want to see people die" and ended: "Now the game begins." The brutality suggested an experienced adult and forced an entire city into a panic - but the truth that unspooled challenged every assumption. Who could have written those words and staged that message?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Jun Hase and the response to the crime that shocked Kobe in 1997, following the discovery, the note, and the investigative choices that were made under the conviction the perpetrator was an adult. How did that conviction shape the hunt, and what happened when it proved to be wrong?<br /><br />Person: Jun Hase<br />Age: 11<br />Date: 1997<br />Location: Kobe<br />Event: severed head found at school gates<br /><br />- The victim, Jun Hase, was eleven years old when his severed head was placed at the entrance gates of a school.<br />- The handwritten note found inside Jun's mouth read: "I desperately want to see people die. Nothing makes me more excited than killing. Now the game begins."<br />- Investigators initially assumed the perpetrator was an adult based on the deliberate staging and tone of the note.<br />- Kobe had been rebuilding after the 1995 Great Hanshin earthquake two years earlier, a context mentioned during the investigation.<br />- The police belief that the crime reflected experience and organization guided the early weeks of the search.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1392</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ordinary Things That Turned London Into a War Zone</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ordinary-things-that-turned-london-into-a-war-zone--72879113</link><description><![CDATA[The Ordinary Things That Turned London Into a War Zone<br /><br />The sound of a market, a black sports bag, and a six-inch nail driven into a two-year-old's skull - ordinary objects that turned three London streets into scenes described as a war zone. How did a man with no known extremist ties use fireworks components, alarm clocks and a common sports bag to nearly destroy three communities in thirteen days?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of the London Nail Bombings, the investigative lead-up and the small forensic clue that changed everything: a clock-face fragment. What did twenty-six thousand hours of CCTV, Operation Marathon and a single Acctim dial reveal about motive and method?<br /><br />Date: 1999<br />Event: London Nail Bombings<br />Case: Operation Marathon<br />Investigator: Detective Chief Inspector Maureen Boyle<br />Injured: 49<br /><br />- First explosion: Saturday 17 April 1999 at approximately 5:30 PM on Brixton Road.<br />- Device filler: inorganic pyrotechnic mixture commonly found in commercial fireworks.<br />- Casualties from Brixton blast: 49 injured, 9 required surgery, including a two-year-old with a six-inch nail lodged in his skull.<br />- Second attack: Saturday 24 April 1999 on Brick Lane; the bag was carried to a car boot and detonated en route, causing six minor injuries.<br />- Forensic breakthrough: a fragment of an Acctim clock face recovered intact from the second device.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879113</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879113/0632.mp3" length="27706778" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Ordinary Things That Turned London Into a War Zone&#13;
&#13;
The sound of a market, a black sports bag, and a six-inch nail driven into a two-year-old's skull - ordinary objects that turned three London streets into scenes described as a war zone. How...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Ordinary Things That Turned London Into a War Zone<br /><br />The sound of a market, a black sports bag, and a six-inch nail driven into a two-year-old's skull - ordinary objects that turned three London streets into scenes described as a war zone. How did a man with no known extremist ties use fireworks components, alarm clocks and a common sports bag to nearly destroy three communities in thirteen days?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of the London Nail Bombings, the investigative lead-up and the small forensic clue that changed everything: a clock-face fragment. What did twenty-six thousand hours of CCTV, Operation Marathon and a single Acctim dial reveal about motive and method?<br /><br />Date: 1999<br />Event: London Nail Bombings<br />Case: Operation Marathon<br />Investigator: Detective Chief Inspector Maureen Boyle<br />Injured: 49<br /><br />- First explosion: Saturday 17 April 1999 at approximately 5:30 PM on Brixton Road.<br />- Device filler: inorganic pyrotechnic mixture commonly found in commercial fireworks.<br />- Casualties from Brixton blast: 49 injured, 9 required surgery, including a two-year-old with a six-inch nail lodged in his skull.<br />- Second attack: Saturday 24 April 1999 on Brick Lane; the bag was carried to a car boot and detonated en route, causing six minor injuries.<br />- Forensic breakthrough: a fragment of an Acctim clock face recovered intact from the second device.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1732</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Tea That Killed a Spy: Polonium on London's Doorstep</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-tea-that-killed-a-spy-polonium-on-london-s-doorstep--72879112</link><description><![CDATA[The Tea That Killed a Spy: Polonium on London's Doorstep<br /><br />A man in a London hospital was dying from a poison so radioactive that one millionth of a gram can kill - and doctors had no idea why for three weeks. The contamination spread through hotels, restaurants and flights across the capital; who had the reach and motive to deliver a microscopic, state-grade toxin in plain sight?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the first mysterious symptoms to the discovery that the victim was Alexander Litvinenko, a former KGB lieutenant colonel living in London, and we track how investigators identified the agent and traced the contamination - could a cup of tea in Mayfair really carry polonium-210?<br /><br />Person: Alexander Litvinenko<br />Date (hospital admission): 3 November 2006<br />Date (death): 23 November 2006<br />Cause: polonium-210 contamination at 100 times lethal threshold<br />Location: University College Hospital, North London<br /><br />- Litvinenko checked into University College Hospital under the name Edwin Carter on 3 November 2006.<br />- Doctors reported hair falling out in clumps and white blood cell count collapsing to zero within days.<br />- Forensic contamination was later found in the Best Western room on Shaftesbury Avenue after two men arrived from Moscow on 16 October 2006.<br />- Autopsy found polonium-210 levels in tissues at 100 times the lethal threshold.<br />- Investigators sent a one-liter urine sample to the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston for analysis, which took 24 hours.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879112</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:37 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879112/0631.mp3" length="25949677" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Tea That Killed a Spy: Polonium on London's Doorstep&#13;
&#13;
A man in a London hospital was dying from a poison so radioactive that one millionth of a gram can kill - and doctors had no idea why for three weeks. The contamination spread through hotels,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Tea That Killed a Spy: Polonium on London's Doorstep<br /><br />A man in a London hospital was dying from a poison so radioactive that one millionth of a gram can kill - and doctors had no idea why for three weeks. The contamination spread through hotels, restaurants and flights across the capital; who had the reach and motive to deliver a microscopic, state-grade toxin in plain sight?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the first mysterious symptoms to the discovery that the victim was Alexander Litvinenko, a former KGB lieutenant colonel living in London, and we track how investigators identified the agent and traced the contamination - could a cup of tea in Mayfair really carry polonium-210?<br /><br />Person: Alexander Litvinenko<br />Date (hospital admission): 3 November 2006<br />Date (death): 23 November 2006<br />Cause: polonium-210 contamination at 100 times lethal threshold<br />Location: University College Hospital, North London<br /><br />- Litvinenko checked into University College Hospital under the name Edwin Carter on 3 November 2006.<br />- Doctors reported hair falling out in clumps and white blood cell count collapsing to zero within days.<br />- Forensic contamination was later found in the Best Western room on Shaftesbury Avenue after two men arrived from Moscow on 16 October 2006.<br />- Autopsy found polonium-210 levels in tissues at 100 times the lethal threshold.<br />- Investigators sent a one-liter urine sample to the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston for analysis, which took 24 hours.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1622</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Soldier Who Bled Out: France's Unsolved Death Triangle Mystery</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-soldier-who-bled-out-france-s-unsolved-death-triangle-mystery--72879111</link><description><![CDATA[The Soldier Who Bled Out: France's Unsolved Death Triangle Mystery<br /><br />Cold, clinical strangulation, a camper van with 457 hairs, and a shovel whose soil matched a teenager’s grave - yet the man suspected of multiple murders cut his own femoral artery the night his trial began and died before a verdict. How did a decorated non-commissioned officer become the central figure in a decade of disappearances across a mapped “Death Triangle,” and why did the court never get to answer it?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of discoveries from the shallow grave found by farmer Marcel Lunt to the arrest of Pierre Chanel and the forensic links between victims and a camper van, asking whether the evidence that tied one man to so many losses could have produced a conviction had he lived.<br /><br />Person: Pierre Chanel<br />Date: 8 August 1987 (grave discovery), 9 August 1988 (arrest)<br />Location: Allencourt and the northern France “Death Triangle”<br />Case: Trevor O'Keefe burial and linked disappearances (1980-1987)<br />Status: Suspect died by self-inflicted femoral artery injury the night his trial began<br /><br />- The victim Trevor O'Keefe was 19 years old and found buried five meters from a road near the A26 on 8 August 1987.<br />- Forensic team extracted 457 individual hairs from Pierre Chanel’s camper van interior.<br />- Mitochondrial DNA analysis indicated three distinct victims with a random match probability of 0.06%.<br />- Investigators recovered 32 pairs of men's underwear from the van, including one with a Marks and Spencer label.<br />- Soil on a shovel blade from the van contained mineral crystals identical to those from O'Keefe’s grave.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879111</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:34 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879111/0630.mp3" length="28623362" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Soldier Who Bled Out: France's Unsolved Death Triangle Mystery&#13;
&#13;
Cold, clinical strangulation, a camper van with 457 hairs, and a shovel whose soil matched a teenager’s grave - yet the man suspected of multiple murders cut his own femoral artery...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Soldier Who Bled Out: France's Unsolved Death Triangle Mystery<br /><br />Cold, clinical strangulation, a camper van with 457 hairs, and a shovel whose soil matched a teenager’s grave - yet the man suspected of multiple murders cut his own femoral artery the night his trial began and died before a verdict. How did a decorated non-commissioned officer become the central figure in a decade of disappearances across a mapped “Death Triangle,” and why did the court never get to answer it?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of discoveries from the shallow grave found by farmer Marcel Lunt to the arrest of Pierre Chanel and the forensic links between victims and a camper van, asking whether the evidence that tied one man to so many losses could have produced a conviction had he lived.<br /><br />Person: Pierre Chanel<br />Date: 8 August 1987 (grave discovery), 9 August 1988 (arrest)<br />Location: Allencourt and the northern France “Death Triangle”<br />Case: Trevor O'Keefe burial and linked disappearances (1980-1987)<br />Status: Suspect died by self-inflicted femoral artery injury the night his trial began<br /><br />- The victim Trevor O'Keefe was 19 years old and found buried five meters from a road near the A26 on 8 August 1987.<br />- Forensic team extracted 457 individual hairs from Pierre Chanel’s camper van interior.<br />- Mitochondrial DNA analysis indicated three distinct victims with a random match probability of 0.06%.<br />- Investigators recovered 32 pairs of men's underwear from the van, including one with a Marks and Spencer label.<br />- Soil on a shovel blade from the van contained mineral crystals identical to those from O'Keefe’s grave.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1789</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Shot Lennon - Then Read The Book That Made Him Real</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-shot-lennon-then-read-the-book-that-made-him-real--72879110</link><description><![CDATA[He Shot Lennon - Then Read The Book That Made Him Real<br /><br />A famous man is killed outside his home while his killer calmly reads a book on the sidewalk; Mark David Chapman fired five times, dropped the gun, and opened The Catcher in the Rye - signing its inside cover "To Holden Caulfield, from Holden Caulfield. This is my statement." How does a reader stop being a person and start acting like a character?<br /><br />In this episode we tell the sequence of events leading up to December 8, 1980, and follow Chapman from his childhood through his purchase of a .38-caliber revolver and his arrival in New York, asking how obsession with a novel and the idea of "phoniness" became a motive for murder.<br /><br />Person: Mark David Chapman<br />Date: December 8, 1980<br />Book: The Catcher in the Rye<br />Weapon: Charter Arms .38-caliber revolver<br />Location: The Dakota, Upper West Side<br /><br />- Chapman fired five shots at John Lennon and then dropped the gun on the sidewalk.<br />- He signed the front cover of The Catcher in the Rye with "To Holden Caulfield, from Holden Caulfield. This is my statement."<br />- Chapman first read The Catcher in the Rye at age 16 in 1973 and called himself "a twenty-five-year-old catcher" in letters to a professor.<br />- On October 23, 1980, Chapman wrote "NOTHING" across his last timecard and quit his job.<br />- On June 20, 1977, Chapman attempted suicide by carbon monoxide and was stopped when a fisherman knocked on his car window.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879110</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:30 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879110/0629.mp3" length="24459235" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Shot Lennon - Then Read The Book That Made Him Real&#13;
&#13;
A famous man is killed outside his home while his killer calmly reads a book on the sidewalk; Mark David Chapman fired five times, dropped the gun, and opened The Catcher in the Rye - signing...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Shot Lennon - Then Read The Book That Made Him Real<br /><br />A famous man is killed outside his home while his killer calmly reads a book on the sidewalk; Mark David Chapman fired five times, dropped the gun, and opened The Catcher in the Rye - signing its inside cover "To Holden Caulfield, from Holden Caulfield. This is my statement." How does a reader stop being a person and start acting like a character?<br /><br />In this episode we tell the sequence of events leading up to December 8, 1980, and follow Chapman from his childhood through his purchase of a .38-caliber revolver and his arrival in New York, asking how obsession with a novel and the idea of "phoniness" became a motive for murder.<br /><br />Person: Mark David Chapman<br />Date: December 8, 1980<br />Book: The Catcher in the Rye<br />Weapon: Charter Arms .38-caliber revolver<br />Location: The Dakota, Upper West Side<br /><br />- Chapman fired five shots at John Lennon and then dropped the gun on the sidewalk.<br />- He signed the front cover of The Catcher in the Rye with "To Holden Caulfield, from Holden Caulfield. This is my statement."<br />- Chapman first read The Catcher in the Rye at age 16 in 1973 and called himself "a twenty-five-year-old catcher" in letters to a professor.<br />- On October 23, 1980, Chapman wrote "NOTHING" across his last timecard and quit his job.<br />- On June 20, 1977, Chapman attempted suicide by carbon monoxide and was stopped when a fisherman knocked on his car window.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1529</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Knew Exactly Where They Stood - The Goleta Night Shift Massacre</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-knew-exactly-where-they-stood-the-goleta-night-shift-massacre--72879109</link><description><![CDATA[She Knew Exactly Where They Stood - The Goleta Night Shift Massacre<br /><br />The night shift at a Goleta postal center felt routine until January 30, 2006, when Jennifer San Marco walked back into the building she once worked in and six people never walked back out. She had worked there for roughly six years, knew the layout that covered about four and a half football fields, and returned after buying a nine-millimeter and 200 rounds-so what made months of reported warning signs fail to stop her?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened before, during, and after the shootings at the Goleta Processing and Distribution Center, following the documented reports, psychiatric hold, and the trip San Marco made from New Mexico to California that culminated in violence; how did a forced removal in 2003 not prevent a massacre three years later?<br /><br />Person: Jennifer San Marco<br />Date: January 30, 2006<br />Location: Goleta Processing and Distribution Center, Santa Barbara County, California<br />Weapon: nine-millimeter semiautomatic pistol<br />Victims: six killed<br /><br />- The facility covers roughly four and a half football fields and employed about eighty night-shift workers on a typical night.<br />- In 2003 Dexter Shannon reported San Marco, triggering a 72-hour involuntary psychiatric hold and a diagnosis; she refused treatment and was retired on medical grounds.<br />- San Marco bought a nine-millimeter pistol and two hundred rounds of reloaded nine-millimeter ammunition in the weeks before the attack, observing a 15-day waiting period in New Mexico.<br />- Before the Goleta attack she stayed in Milan, New Mexico, where she published five volumes titled "The Racist Press" and exhibited public disturbances like kneeling in prayer outside the municipal building.<br />- Beverly Graham, San Marco's former neighbor, was found dead in her condominium the day before the postal facility shootings; San Marco parked approximately 30 meters from the employee entrance before entering.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879109</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:27 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879109/0628.mp3" length="28605390" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Knew Exactly Where They Stood - The Goleta Night Shift Massacre&#13;
&#13;
The night shift at a Goleta postal center felt routine until January 30, 2006, when Jennifer San Marco walked back into the building she once worked in and six people never walked...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Knew Exactly Where They Stood - The Goleta Night Shift Massacre<br /><br />The night shift at a Goleta postal center felt routine until January 30, 2006, when Jennifer San Marco walked back into the building she once worked in and six people never walked back out. She had worked there for roughly six years, knew the layout that covered about four and a half football fields, and returned after buying a nine-millimeter and 200 rounds-so what made months of reported warning signs fail to stop her?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened before, during, and after the shootings at the Goleta Processing and Distribution Center, following the documented reports, psychiatric hold, and the trip San Marco made from New Mexico to California that culminated in violence; how did a forced removal in 2003 not prevent a massacre three years later?<br /><br />Person: Jennifer San Marco<br />Date: January 30, 2006<br />Location: Goleta Processing and Distribution Center, Santa Barbara County, California<br />Weapon: nine-millimeter semiautomatic pistol<br />Victims: six killed<br /><br />- The facility covers roughly four and a half football fields and employed about eighty night-shift workers on a typical night.<br />- In 2003 Dexter Shannon reported San Marco, triggering a 72-hour involuntary psychiatric hold and a diagnosis; she refused treatment and was retired on medical grounds.<br />- San Marco bought a nine-millimeter pistol and two hundred rounds of reloaded nine-millimeter ammunition in the weeks before the attack, observing a 15-day waiting period in New Mexico.<br />- Before the Goleta attack she stayed in Milan, New Mexico, where she published five volumes titled "The Racist Press" and exhibited public disturbances like kneeling in prayer outside the municipal building.<br />- Beverly Graham, San Marco's former neighbor, was found dead in her condominium the day before the postal facility shootings; San Marco parked approximately 30 meters from the employee entrance before entering.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1788</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Nurse Who Smiled While Injecting Babies: Grantham's Secret</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-nurse-who-smiled-while-injecting-babies-grantham-s-secret--72879108</link><description><![CDATA[The Nurse Who Smiled While Injecting Babies: Grantham's Secret<br /><br />The most dangerous place in England for a sick child in spring 1991 was a small pediatric ward - not from disease or equipment but because of the nurse on duty, who was present in the room for every collapse. Thirteen children collapsed in fifty-nine days and four died; how did one staff member inject insulin levels recorded at 47,000 milli-units per liter without immediate detection?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how Ward Four at Grantham Hospital became the setting for repeated unexplained pediatric collapses and how routine procedures and staffing gaps allowed a pattern to go unnoticed. What choices in hiring, oversight, and testing let these incidents multiply before anyone connected the dots?<br /><br />Person: Beverly Gale Allit<br />Date: February 18, 1991 (start of contract)<br />Period: Fifty-nine days on Ward Four<br />Case: Thirteen children collapsed, four died<br />Lab result: 500 milli-units per liter reported (actual 47,000 milli-units per liter)<br /><br />- Beverly Allit was 22 years old when she began a six-month contract on Ward Four.<br />- Her training record showed approximately 160 days of sick leave across two years.<br />- Liam Taylor died on February 21, 1991, listed as cardiac arrest of unknown origin.<br />- Paul Crampton’s blood initially measured 500 milli-units per liter of insulin by Cardiff equipment.<br />- Later analysis showed Paul’s true insulin level was 47,000 milli-units per liter.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879108</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879108/0627.mp3" length="26451646" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Nurse Who Smiled While Injecting Babies: Grantham's Secret&#13;
&#13;
The most dangerous place in England for a sick child in spring 1991 was a small pediatric ward - not from disease or equipment but because of the nurse on duty, who was present in the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Nurse Who Smiled While Injecting Babies: Grantham's Secret<br /><br />The most dangerous place in England for a sick child in spring 1991 was a small pediatric ward - not from disease or equipment but because of the nurse on duty, who was present in the room for every collapse. Thirteen children collapsed in fifty-nine days and four died; how did one staff member inject insulin levels recorded at 47,000 milli-units per liter without immediate detection?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how Ward Four at Grantham Hospital became the setting for repeated unexplained pediatric collapses and how routine procedures and staffing gaps allowed a pattern to go unnoticed. What choices in hiring, oversight, and testing let these incidents multiply before anyone connected the dots?<br /><br />Person: Beverly Gale Allit<br />Date: February 18, 1991 (start of contract)<br />Period: Fifty-nine days on Ward Four<br />Case: Thirteen children collapsed, four died<br />Lab result: 500 milli-units per liter reported (actual 47,000 milli-units per liter)<br /><br />- Beverly Allit was 22 years old when she began a six-month contract on Ward Four.<br />- Her training record showed approximately 160 days of sick leave across two years.<br />- Liam Taylor died on February 21, 1991, listed as cardiac arrest of unknown origin.<br />- Paul Crampton’s blood initially measured 500 milli-units per liter of insulin by Cardiff equipment.<br />- Later analysis showed Paul’s true insulin level was 47,000 milli-units per liter.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1654</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Forbidden Photograph: Did a Childhood Murderer Walk Free?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-forbidden-photograph-did-a-childhood-murderer-walk-free--72879107</link><description><![CDATA[The Forbidden Photograph: Did a Childhood Murderer Walk Free?<br /><br />A banned photograph of a teenager has been forwarded thousands of times across UK email chains despite a court injunction and a judge’s order preventing its publication. The image ties back to the 1993 murder of two‑year‑old James Bulger and raises a single piercing question: can someone ever fully leave what they did at ten years old?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the facts around the case and the photograph circulating years later, laying out the timeline, the evidence, and the courtroom moments that shaped public reaction - and we ask whether new names, sealed lives, and legal protections can erase the past.<br /><br />Person: James Bulger<br />Date: 12 February 1993<br />Location: Strand Shopping Centre, Bootle, Liverpool<br />Persons Found Guilty: Robert Thompson; Jon Venables<br />Injuries: 24 distinct injuries; cause of death blunt force trauma to the head<br /><br />- James Bulger was two years old and wearing a blue anorak when he disappeared in the Strand Shopping Centre.<br />- Two ten‑year‑old boys led James out of the shopping centre; both were later arrested within days.<br />- A pathologist recorded 24 distinct injuries and confirmed death from blunt force trauma using bricks and a metal bar.<br />- Tests confirmed blood on Robert Thompson’s shoes matched James Bulger.<br />- By the time of recording, the court‑banned photograph had been forwarded thousands of times across email chains in the United Kingdom.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879107</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879107/0626.mp3" length="35856146" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Forbidden Photograph: Did a Childhood Murderer Walk Free?&#13;
&#13;
A banned photograph of a teenager has been forwarded thousands of times across UK email chains despite a court injunction and a judge’s order preventing its publication. The image ties...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Forbidden Photograph: Did a Childhood Murderer Walk Free?<br /><br />A banned photograph of a teenager has been forwarded thousands of times across UK email chains despite a court injunction and a judge’s order preventing its publication. The image ties back to the 1993 murder of two‑year‑old James Bulger and raises a single piercing question: can someone ever fully leave what they did at ten years old?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the facts around the case and the photograph circulating years later, laying out the timeline, the evidence, and the courtroom moments that shaped public reaction - and we ask whether new names, sealed lives, and legal protections can erase the past.<br /><br />Person: James Bulger<br />Date: 12 February 1993<br />Location: Strand Shopping Centre, Bootle, Liverpool<br />Persons Found Guilty: Robert Thompson; Jon Venables<br />Injuries: 24 distinct injuries; cause of death blunt force trauma to the head<br /><br />- James Bulger was two years old and wearing a blue anorak when he disappeared in the Strand Shopping Centre.<br />- Two ten‑year‑old boys led James out of the shopping centre; both were later arrested within days.<br />- A pathologist recorded 24 distinct injuries and confirmed death from blunt force trauma using bricks and a metal bar.<br />- Tests confirmed blood on Robert Thompson’s shoes matched James Bulger.<br />- By the time of recording, the court‑banned photograph had been forwarded thousands of times across email chains in the United Kingdom.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2241</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Trusted Doctor Who Killed Hundreds - How He Hid It All</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-trusted-doctor-who-killed-hundreds-how-he-hid-it-all--72879106</link><description><![CDATA[The Trusted Doctor Who Killed Hundreds - How He Hid It All<br /><br />A small English town trusted its doctor so completely that no one suspected he was killing his patients for decades; investigators still cannot confirm whether the number is around two hundred or even higher. How did a trusted family physician use house calls, wills, and a spotless consulting room to hide a killing spree no one noticed until a solicitor walked into a police station with a contradicted will?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of warnings, documents, and people that led to the unravelling of Dr. Harold Frederick Shipman's secret. We cover the will that triggered the investigation, the patterns noticed by a funeral director and a taxi driver, and the past offences that should have raised alarms - but did not. How did all those red flags dissolve against his reputation?<br /><br />Person: Harold Frederick Shipman<br />Date: 22 June 1998<br />Location: Hyde, Greater Manchester<br />Amount: £300,000<br />Charge record: admitted eight charges in February 1976 (obtaining drugs by deception); 74 additional offences taken into consideration<br /><br />- Kathleen Grundy, aged 81 and former mayor of Hyde, died two days after a new will naming Shipman sole beneficiary arrived at a law firm.<br />- Shipman opened a solo practice on Market Street in 1991 after taking three thousand patients with him from a group practice.<br />- Debbie Bambroffe and her funeral home noted repeated patterns: almost always women, dressed for the day, seated-not in bed-and no terminal diagnosis.<br />- In the mid-1970s Shipman was falsely diagnosed with epilepsy but the real issue was pethidine addiction; he admitted eight charges in February 1976 and was fined £600.<br />- Angela Woodruff, the daughter and solicitor of Kathleen Grundy, brought two wills to police-one from ten years earlier leaving everything to family and a recent one leaving £300,000 to Shipman.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879106</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:15 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879106/0625.mp3" length="30081622" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Trusted Doctor Who Killed Hundreds - How He Hid It All&#13;
&#13;
A small English town trusted its doctor so completely that no one suspected he was killing his patients for decades; investigators still cannot confirm whether the number is around two...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Trusted Doctor Who Killed Hundreds - How He Hid It All<br /><br />A small English town trusted its doctor so completely that no one suspected he was killing his patients for decades; investigators still cannot confirm whether the number is around two hundred or even higher. How did a trusted family physician use house calls, wills, and a spotless consulting room to hide a killing spree no one noticed until a solicitor walked into a police station with a contradicted will?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of warnings, documents, and people that led to the unravelling of Dr. Harold Frederick Shipman's secret. We cover the will that triggered the investigation, the patterns noticed by a funeral director and a taxi driver, and the past offences that should have raised alarms - but did not. How did all those red flags dissolve against his reputation?<br /><br />Person: Harold Frederick Shipman<br />Date: 22 June 1998<br />Location: Hyde, Greater Manchester<br />Amount: £300,000<br />Charge record: admitted eight charges in February 1976 (obtaining drugs by deception); 74 additional offences taken into consideration<br /><br />- Kathleen Grundy, aged 81 and former mayor of Hyde, died two days after a new will naming Shipman sole beneficiary arrived at a law firm.<br />- Shipman opened a solo practice on Market Street in 1991 after taking three thousand patients with him from a group practice.<br />- Debbie Bambroffe and her funeral home noted repeated patterns: almost always women, dressed for the day, seated-not in bed-and no terminal diagnosis.<br />- In the mid-1970s Shipman was falsely diagnosed with epilepsy but the real issue was pethidine addiction; he admitted eight charges in February 1976 and was fined £600.<br />- Angela Woodruff, the daughter and solicitor of Kathleen Grundy, brought two wills to police-one from ten years earlier leaving everything to family and a recent one leaving £300,000 to Shipman.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1881</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Sock in the Sea: How a Tiny Clue Tore a Family Apart</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-sock-in-the-sea-how-a-tiny-clue-tore-a-family-apart--72879105</link><description><![CDATA[The Sock in the Sea: How a Tiny Clue Tore a Family Apart<br /><br />A single clue - a folded scrap hidden inside the right sock of a dead man pulled from the sea - became the pivot that cracked a disappearance involving a family of five from England in February 2003. Phone records, a pre-signed briefcase and a Devon field with burned clothing point to planning and betrayal; what really happened to the two children remains unanswered.<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from Anil Chohan leaving CIBA Freight on 13 February 2003 to the discovery of forensic evidence on a Devon farm, and ask how one man’s folded paper changed the course of an investigation and a family.<br /><br />Person: Anil Chohan<br />Date: 13 February 2003<br />Location: Devon (forensic excavation) and Stonehenge area (phone trace)<br />Status: Two children never found<br />Case: CIBA Freight disappearance<br /><br />- Anil Chohan was 33 years old when he left his freight company on 13 February 2003.<br />- Anil’s children were Devinder (18 months) and Ravinder (8 weeks old).<br />- Kenneth Regan had been arrested in June 1998 with 25 kilograms of heroin and later became a police informant.<br />- Forensic excavation during Easter 2003 found strands of Anil’s hair, burned clothing, jewelry attributed to Nancy, and metal clasps from a baby outfit.<br />- Investigators found a gray briefcase containing ten blank sheets of paper pre-signed with Anil Chohan’s signature.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879105</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879105/0624.mp3" length="23589044" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Sock in the Sea: How a Tiny Clue Tore a Family Apart&#13;
&#13;
A single clue - a folded scrap hidden inside the right sock of a dead man pulled from the sea - became the pivot that cracked a disappearance involving a family of five from England in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Sock in the Sea: How a Tiny Clue Tore a Family Apart<br /><br />A single clue - a folded scrap hidden inside the right sock of a dead man pulled from the sea - became the pivot that cracked a disappearance involving a family of five from England in February 2003. Phone records, a pre-signed briefcase and a Devon field with burned clothing point to planning and betrayal; what really happened to the two children remains unanswered.<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from Anil Chohan leaving CIBA Freight on 13 February 2003 to the discovery of forensic evidence on a Devon farm, and ask how one man’s folded paper changed the course of an investigation and a family.<br /><br />Person: Anil Chohan<br />Date: 13 February 2003<br />Location: Devon (forensic excavation) and Stonehenge area (phone trace)<br />Status: Two children never found<br />Case: CIBA Freight disappearance<br /><br />- Anil Chohan was 33 years old when he left his freight company on 13 February 2003.<br />- Anil’s children were Devinder (18 months) and Ravinder (8 weeks old).<br />- Kenneth Regan had been arrested in June 1998 with 25 kilograms of heroin and later became a police informant.<br />- Forensic excavation during Easter 2003 found strands of Anil’s hair, burned clothing, jewelry attributed to Nancy, and metal clasps from a baby outfit.<br />- Investigators found a gray briefcase containing ten blank sheets of paper pre-signed with Anil Chohan’s signature.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1475</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Behind Broadmoor's Gates: The Men Who Never Left Their Shadows</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/behind-broadmoor-s-gates-the-men-who-never-left-their-shadows--72879104</link><description><![CDATA[Behind Broadmoor's Gates: The Men Who Never Left Their Shadows<br /><br />They lived behind ten locked doors, inside a hospital built 150 years ago to hold what society could not; two hundred patients, eight hundred staff, and a containment team called out about thirty times a year. What happens to a person after a lifetime of being told they are evil - and can any door inside Broadmoor ever truly open them back to the world?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow individual stories from Broadmoor Hospital in Berkshire, England, and hear how conviction, violence, voices, and medication shaped lives over decades. Listen to the moments that turned a life toward the walls and the rare, fragile chances someone found to step away.<br /><br />Location: Berkshire, England<br />Institution: Broadmoor Hospital<br />Capacity: 200 patients across 15 wards<br />Staff: 800 employees<br />Containment deployments per year: approximately 30<br /><br />- Broadmoor was built about 150 years ago with architecture intended to project permanence.<br />- To move between areas inside Broadmoor each person must pass through 10 separate locked doors.<br />- Adam spent 13 years at Broadmoor: 9 years on the highest-dependency ward and 4 years on Canterbury Ward.<br />- Michael’s first voice began at age 24 and medication reduces its volume but does not remove it.<br />- Mukhtar was 18 when a single gunshot resulted in a manslaughter conviction and his transfer to Broadmoor, where medication noticeably reduced his voices.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879104</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879104/0623.mp3" length="27845958" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Behind Broadmoor's Gates: The Men Who Never Left Their Shadows&#13;
&#13;
They lived behind ten locked doors, inside a hospital built 150 years ago to hold what society could not; two hundred patients, eight hundred staff, and a containment team called out...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Behind Broadmoor's Gates: The Men Who Never Left Their Shadows<br /><br />They lived behind ten locked doors, inside a hospital built 150 years ago to hold what society could not; two hundred patients, eight hundred staff, and a containment team called out about thirty times a year. What happens to a person after a lifetime of being told they are evil - and can any door inside Broadmoor ever truly open them back to the world?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow individual stories from Broadmoor Hospital in Berkshire, England, and hear how conviction, violence, voices, and medication shaped lives over decades. Listen to the moments that turned a life toward the walls and the rare, fragile chances someone found to step away.<br /><br />Location: Berkshire, England<br />Institution: Broadmoor Hospital<br />Capacity: 200 patients across 15 wards<br />Staff: 800 employees<br />Containment deployments per year: approximately 30<br /><br />- Broadmoor was built about 150 years ago with architecture intended to project permanence.<br />- To move between areas inside Broadmoor each person must pass through 10 separate locked doors.<br />- Adam spent 13 years at Broadmoor: 9 years on the highest-dependency ward and 4 years on Canterbury Ward.<br />- Michael’s first voice began at age 24 and medication reduces its volume but does not remove it.<br />- Mukhtar was 18 when a single gunshot resulted in a manslaughter conviction and his transfer to Broadmoor, where medication noticeably reduced his voices.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1741</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Was Standing on Her Road: How Polly Vanished at Night</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-was-standing-on-her-road-how-polly-vanished-at-night--72879103</link><description><![CDATA[He Was Standing on Her Road: How Polly Vanished at Night<br /><br />A twelve-year-old girl was carried out of her slumber party while her mother slept twelve feet away - and a man seen on her road that night was questioned and released. The case hinges on a single partial palm print and a hair with scalp tissue found in the bedroom carpet; how did so many chances to stop him slip through the cracks?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline of October 1, 1993, the eyewitness reports, and the forensic discoveries that shaped the investigation, asking how missed connections and methodical preparation let a predator leave the scene. What exactly tied the man seen on the road to the evidence in Polly's room?<br /><br />Date: October 1, 1993<br />Person: Polly Klass<br />Location: Petaluma, California<br />Case: abduction from home during slumber party<br />Evidence: partial palm print and dark brown hair with scalp tissue<br /><br />- Three twelve-year-old girls were in Polly's bedroom at about 10:30 p.m. on October 1, 1993.<br />- Eve Nichol, Polly's mother, was sleeping in a room twelve feet away after taking migraine medication around 9:45 p.m.<br />- The abductor entered through an open window carrying pre-cut fabric strips and a bag, bound two girls and carried Polly out.<br />- Investigators found a dark brown hair with 3-4 millimeters of scalp tissue embedded in the bedroom carpet.<br />- Detective Mike Meese discovered a partial palm print on the bed rail revealed only under alternate light and fluorescent powder.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879103</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879103/0622.mp3" length="22938282" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Was Standing on Her Road: How Polly Vanished at Night&#13;
&#13;
A twelve-year-old girl was carried out of her slumber party while her mother slept twelve feet away - and a man seen on her road that night was questioned and released. The case hinges on a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Was Standing on Her Road: How Polly Vanished at Night<br /><br />A twelve-year-old girl was carried out of her slumber party while her mother slept twelve feet away - and a man seen on her road that night was questioned and released. The case hinges on a single partial palm print and a hair with scalp tissue found in the bedroom carpet; how did so many chances to stop him slip through the cracks?<br /><br />In this episode, we walk through the timeline of October 1, 1993, the eyewitness reports, and the forensic discoveries that shaped the investigation, asking how missed connections and methodical preparation let a predator leave the scene. What exactly tied the man seen on the road to the evidence in Polly's room?<br /><br />Date: October 1, 1993<br />Person: Polly Klass<br />Location: Petaluma, California<br />Case: abduction from home during slumber party<br />Evidence: partial palm print and dark brown hair with scalp tissue<br /><br />- Three twelve-year-old girls were in Polly's bedroom at about 10:30 p.m. on October 1, 1993.<br />- Eve Nichol, Polly's mother, was sleeping in a room twelve feet away after taking migraine medication around 9:45 p.m.<br />- The abductor entered through an open window carrying pre-cut fabric strips and a bag, bound two girls and carried Polly out.<br />- Investigators found a dark brown hair with 3-4 millimeters of scalp tissue embedded in the bedroom carpet.<br />- Detective Mike Meese discovered a partial palm print on the bed rail revealed only under alternate light and fluorescent powder.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1434</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Highwayman Who Stopped a Woman and Couldn't Bury the Truth</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-highwayman-who-stopped-a-woman-and-couldn-t-bury-the-truth--72879102</link><description><![CDATA[The Highwayman Who Stopped a Woman and Couldn't Bury the Truth<br /><br />The desert road was quiet, the temperature near freezing, and a decorated California Highway Patrol officer who had won Officer of the Year reported a possible suicide - but a single intact bullet and clear handcuff marks told a different story. How did a man who stopped women for years finally make one mistake that undone him?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of what happened on the night of January 11, 1982, to twenty-three-year-old Robin Bishop on Interstate 15 near Barstow, California, and how investigators shifted the case from suicide to homicide after evidence at the scene raised one persistent question: what detail could not be forced back into place?<br /><br />Person: George Michael Gwaltney<br />Person: Robin Bishop<br />Date: January 11, 1982<br />Location: Access road east of Barstow, California, roughly 400 feet off Interstate 15<br />Agency: San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department<br /><br />- Robin Bishop was 23 years old and driving from Barstow to Las Vegas on Interstate 15 the night she disappeared.<br />- Her body was found sitting nearly upright with a single entrance gunshot wound to the posterior of her skull and the bullet intact in her jaw.<br />- Investigators noted two thin horizontal marks on the tops of her wrists and one on the underside, consistent with handcuff impressions.<br />- Tire tracks at the scene matched a vehicle wider than a standard passenger car and were consistent with a California Highway Patrol vehicle.<br />- George Michael Gwaltney, a CHP officer stationed in Barstow and the man who called in the possible suicide, had previously stopped women on that same stretch of desert highway.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879102</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:50:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879102/0621.mp3" length="28619601" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Highwayman Who Stopped a Woman and Couldn't Bury the Truth&#13;
&#13;
The desert road was quiet, the temperature near freezing, and a decorated California Highway Patrol officer who had won Officer of the Year reported a possible suicide - but a single...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Highwayman Who Stopped a Woman and Couldn't Bury the Truth<br /><br />The desert road was quiet, the temperature near freezing, and a decorated California Highway Patrol officer who had won Officer of the Year reported a possible suicide - but a single intact bullet and clear handcuff marks told a different story. How did a man who stopped women for years finally make one mistake that undone him?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of what happened on the night of January 11, 1982, to twenty-three-year-old Robin Bishop on Interstate 15 near Barstow, California, and how investigators shifted the case from suicide to homicide after evidence at the scene raised one persistent question: what detail could not be forced back into place?<br /><br />Person: George Michael Gwaltney<br />Person: Robin Bishop<br />Date: January 11, 1982<br />Location: Access road east of Barstow, California, roughly 400 feet off Interstate 15<br />Agency: San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department<br /><br />- Robin Bishop was 23 years old and driving from Barstow to Las Vegas on Interstate 15 the night she disappeared.<br />- Her body was found sitting nearly upright with a single entrance gunshot wound to the posterior of her skull and the bullet intact in her jaw.<br />- Investigators noted two thin horizontal marks on the tops of her wrists and one on the underside, consistent with handcuff impressions.<br />- Tire tracks at the scene matched a vehicle wider than a standard passenger car and were consistent with a California Highway Patrol vehicle.<br />- George Michael Gwaltney, a CHP officer stationed in Barstow and the man who called in the possible suicide, had previously stopped women on that same stretch of desert highway.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1789</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Knew Every Fire Track - How a Hitchhiker Barely Escaped</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-knew-every-fire-track-how-a-hitchhiker-barely-escaped--72879101</link><description><![CDATA[He Knew Every Fire Track - How a Hitchhiker Barely Escaped<br /><br />The Hume Highway felt safe to thousands of backpackers, yet seven people vanished into a forest only a man who knew every fire track could navigate; one survivor ran zigzag across the road while the killer fired twice in daylight. How did a tidy, controlled neighbor with an immaculate garden turn a stretch of eucalyptus into a methodical killing ground?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the route of those who thumbed rides down the Hume Highway and trace the pattern of disappearances into the Berlanga Low State Forest, asking how familiarity with fire tracks and a life built on control became instruments of murder.<br /><br />Person: Paul Onions<br />Person: Ivan Milat<br />Location: Hume Highway<br />Location: Berlanga Low State Forest<br />Date: 30 December 1989<br /><br />- Paul Onions was a 24-year-old British backpacker who escaped after being shot at while running in a zigzag down the center of the Hume Highway.<br />- Ivan Milat was born 27 December 1944 and was the fifth of fourteen children.<br />- Seven people entered Milat's car; Paul Onions was the only person who left it alive.<br />- James Gibson and Deborah Everest disappeared after being last seen on 30 December 1989 standing on the shoulder of the Hume Highway.<br />- The Hume Highway connects Sydney to Melbourne across approximately 600 miles of road used heavily by backpackers in the late 1980s and early 1990s.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879101</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:57 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879101/0620.mp3" length="27889008" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Knew Every Fire Track - How a Hitchhiker Barely Escaped&#13;
&#13;
The Hume Highway felt safe to thousands of backpackers, yet seven people vanished into a forest only a man who knew every fire track could navigate; one survivor ran zigzag across the road...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Knew Every Fire Track - How a Hitchhiker Barely Escaped<br /><br />The Hume Highway felt safe to thousands of backpackers, yet seven people vanished into a forest only a man who knew every fire track could navigate; one survivor ran zigzag across the road while the killer fired twice in daylight. How did a tidy, controlled neighbor with an immaculate garden turn a stretch of eucalyptus into a methodical killing ground?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the route of those who thumbed rides down the Hume Highway and trace the pattern of disappearances into the Berlanga Low State Forest, asking how familiarity with fire tracks and a life built on control became instruments of murder.<br /><br />Person: Paul Onions<br />Person: Ivan Milat<br />Location: Hume Highway<br />Location: Berlanga Low State Forest<br />Date: 30 December 1989<br /><br />- Paul Onions was a 24-year-old British backpacker who escaped after being shot at while running in a zigzag down the center of the Hume Highway.<br />- Ivan Milat was born 27 December 1944 and was the fifth of fourteen children.<br />- Seven people entered Milat's car; Paul Onions was the only person who left it alive.<br />- James Gibson and Deborah Everest disappeared after being last seen on 30 December 1989 standing on the shoulder of the Hume Highway.<br />- The Hume Highway connects Sydney to Melbourne across approximately 600 miles of road used heavily by backpackers in the late 1980s and early 1990s.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1744</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Quiet Sniper: Why Ohio's Roads Hid a Predator for Years</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-quiet-sniper-why-ohio-s-roads-hid-a-predator-for-years--72879100</link><description><![CDATA[The Quiet Sniper: Why Ohio's Roads Hid a Predator for Years<br /><br />A man drove rural Ohio roads for four years, choosing strangers at random and firing single, precise shots that left no casings and no witnesses-five men killed on five different Saturdays. The killer used county lines and federal land to fragment investigations; what kept investigators awake was how ordinary the victims were and how methodical the shooter remained. How could one person pick off strangers across counties for years without leaving the trace that would stop him?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the patterns of the killings, following each attack from the first in April 1989 through the final murders in 1992 to ask what gaps in policing and geography allowed the killer to operate. What does the pattern of locations, timing, and silence reveal about the killer’s methods and motives?<br /><br />Person: Donald Welling<br />Date: April 1, 1989<br />Location: Tuscarawas County<br />Case: Five shootings across four years<br />Status: Shooter drove rural roads and left no casings<br /><br />- Victim Donald Welling was 35 years old and shot once through the heart on April 1, 1989.<br />- Jamie Paxton, age 21, was shot three times on November 10, 1990 near State Route 9 in Belmont County.<br />- Kevin Loring, age 30, was shot once in the head on November 28, 1990 in Muskingum County.<br />- Claude Hawkins was killed on March 14, 1992 at Wills Creek Dam, federal property.<br />- Gary Bradley, age 44, was shot while fishing on April 5, 1992 at a pond in Noble County.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879100</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879100/0619.mp3" length="30736146" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Quiet Sniper: Why Ohio's Roads Hid a Predator for Years&#13;
&#13;
A man drove rural Ohio roads for four years, choosing strangers at random and firing single, precise shots that left no casings and no witnesses-five men killed on five different...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Quiet Sniper: Why Ohio's Roads Hid a Predator for Years<br /><br />A man drove rural Ohio roads for four years, choosing strangers at random and firing single, precise shots that left no casings and no witnesses-five men killed on five different Saturdays. The killer used county lines and federal land to fragment investigations; what kept investigators awake was how ordinary the victims were and how methodical the shooter remained. How could one person pick off strangers across counties for years without leaving the trace that would stop him?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline and the patterns of the killings, following each attack from the first in April 1989 through the final murders in 1992 to ask what gaps in policing and geography allowed the killer to operate. What does the pattern of locations, timing, and silence reveal about the killer’s methods and motives?<br /><br />Person: Donald Welling<br />Date: April 1, 1989<br />Location: Tuscarawas County<br />Case: Five shootings across four years<br />Status: Shooter drove rural roads and left no casings<br /><br />- Victim Donald Welling was 35 years old and shot once through the heart on April 1, 1989.<br />- Jamie Paxton, age 21, was shot three times on November 10, 1990 near State Route 9 in Belmont County.<br />- Kevin Loring, age 30, was shot once in the head on November 28, 1990 in Muskingum County.<br />- Claude Hawkins was killed on March 14, 1992 at Wills Creek Dam, federal property.<br />- Gary Bradley, age 44, was shot while fishing on April 5, 1992 at a pond in Noble County.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1921</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Every Door Unlocked: The Newman Family's Silent Morning of Murder</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/every-door-unlocked-the-newman-family-s-silent-morning-of-murder--72879099</link><description><![CDATA[Every Door Unlocked: The Newman Family's Silent Morning of Murder<br /><br />Cold Anchorage air, an unlocked front door, and three people inside who would never open a door again-Nancy Newman, eight-year-old Melissa, and three-year-old Angie. The apartment showed no forced entry, no signs of struggle, and a cigarette brand no one smoked on the counter; how could a crime so controlled happen with every door left unlocked?<br /><br />In this episode, we narrate the chronology and physical details found that morning, the family relationships and who was in and out of the Newman apartment before the murders, and the investigative choices that followed. What does the scene of an undisturbed, freshly vacuumed home with specific anomalies tell us about who was allowed inside?<br /><br />Person: Nancy Newman<br />Person: Melissa Newman<br />Person: Angie Newman<br />Person: Kirby Anthony<br />Date: Sunday, March 15, 1987<br /><br />- The apartment door to 4B was unlocked when Cheryl and Paul Chapman pushed it open that morning.<br />- Nancy's car was still in the parking lot where she'd left it two nights earlier.<br />- Cheryl's coffee mug from Friday night remained on the kitchen counter exactly where she'd left it.<br />- Melissa, age eight, was found on her bedroom floor with a pillowcase twisted beneath her neck and her arms bound.<br />- Kirby Anthony was twenty-three years old in March 1987 and had lived temporarily in the Newman apartment before being asked to leave.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879099</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:49 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879099/0618.mp3" length="26077991" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Every Door Unlocked: The Newman Family's Silent Morning of Murder&#13;
&#13;
Cold Anchorage air, an unlocked front door, and three people inside who would never open a door again-Nancy Newman, eight-year-old Melissa, and three-year-old Angie. The apartment...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Every Door Unlocked: The Newman Family's Silent Morning of Murder<br /><br />Cold Anchorage air, an unlocked front door, and three people inside who would never open a door again-Nancy Newman, eight-year-old Melissa, and three-year-old Angie. The apartment showed no forced entry, no signs of struggle, and a cigarette brand no one smoked on the counter; how could a crime so controlled happen with every door left unlocked?<br /><br />In this episode, we narrate the chronology and physical details found that morning, the family relationships and who was in and out of the Newman apartment before the murders, and the investigative choices that followed. What does the scene of an undisturbed, freshly vacuumed home with specific anomalies tell us about who was allowed inside?<br /><br />Person: Nancy Newman<br />Person: Melissa Newman<br />Person: Angie Newman<br />Person: Kirby Anthony<br />Date: Sunday, March 15, 1987<br /><br />- The apartment door to 4B was unlocked when Cheryl and Paul Chapman pushed it open that morning.<br />- Nancy's car was still in the parking lot where she'd left it two nights earlier.<br />- Cheryl's coffee mug from Friday night remained on the kitchen counter exactly where she'd left it.<br />- Melissa, age eight, was found on her bedroom floor with a pillowcase twisted beneath her neck and her arms bound.<br />- Kirby Anthony was twenty-three years old in March 1987 and had lived temporarily in the Newman apartment before being asked to leave.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1630</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Skull in a Canister: Palmyra's Silent Year of Disappearances</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/skull-in-a-canister-palmyra-s-silent-year-of-disappearances--72879098</link><description><![CDATA[Skull in a Canister: Palmyra's Silent Year of Disappearances<br /><br />A remote U.S. territory where visitors plan every arrival, yet in 1974 two people vanished leaving only a repainted boat and, seven years later, a skull inside an aluminum canister scorched with fire. Who vanished that day, what was found years later, and how did a wristwatch with a name become the single thread to the missing?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events on Palmyra Atoll from the Grahams’ arrival and the June 26, 1974 landing of a damaged boat to the last radio call on August 27, 1974 and the 1981 beach discovery that changed everything - what happened between that radio silence and the burned canister?<br /><br />Person: Eleanor Graham (Muff)<br />Person: Mac Graham<br />Person: Buck Dwayne Walker (alias Roy Allen)<br />Person: Stephanie Stearns<br />Date: August 27, 1974<br /><br />- Palmyra Atoll is located roughly 1,000 miles south of Hawaii.<br />- Buck Dwayne Walker and Stephanie Stearns arrived aboard the Iola on June 26, 1974 after a 19-day crossing.<br />- Muff Graham wrote a letter dated July 13, 1974 saying she was frightened of the couple who had arrived.<br />- The last radio transmission from Mac Graham (callsign KH6IHG) occurred on August 27, 1974 mentioning Stephanie bringing a cake.<br />- On January 21, 1981 Sharon Jordan found an aluminum canister on Palmyra beach containing human bones, a skull, and a wristwatch bearing Eleanor Graham’s name.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879098</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:46 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879098/0617.mp3" length="28708208" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Skull in a Canister: Palmyra's Silent Year of Disappearances&#13;
&#13;
A remote U.S. territory where visitors plan every arrival, yet in 1974 two people vanished leaving only a repainted boat and, seven years later, a skull inside an aluminum canister...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Skull in a Canister: Palmyra's Silent Year of Disappearances<br /><br />A remote U.S. territory where visitors plan every arrival, yet in 1974 two people vanished leaving only a repainted boat and, seven years later, a skull inside an aluminum canister scorched with fire. Who vanished that day, what was found years later, and how did a wristwatch with a name become the single thread to the missing?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events on Palmyra Atoll from the Grahams’ arrival and the June 26, 1974 landing of a damaged boat to the last radio call on August 27, 1974 and the 1981 beach discovery that changed everything - what happened between that radio silence and the burned canister?<br /><br />Person: Eleanor Graham (Muff)<br />Person: Mac Graham<br />Person: Buck Dwayne Walker (alias Roy Allen)<br />Person: Stephanie Stearns<br />Date: August 27, 1974<br /><br />- Palmyra Atoll is located roughly 1,000 miles south of Hawaii.<br />- Buck Dwayne Walker and Stephanie Stearns arrived aboard the Iola on June 26, 1974 after a 19-day crossing.<br />- Muff Graham wrote a letter dated July 13, 1974 saying she was frightened of the couple who had arrived.<br />- The last radio transmission from Mac Graham (callsign KH6IHG) occurred on August 27, 1974 mentioning Stephanie bringing a cake.<br />- On January 21, 1981 Sharon Jordan found an aluminum canister on Palmyra beach containing human bones, a skull, and a wristwatch bearing Eleanor Graham’s name.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1795</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Buried Alive: The Clay in Andrew Goodman's Hand Reveals Murder</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/buried-alive-the-clay-in-andrew-goodman-s-hand-reveals-murder--72879097</link><description><![CDATA[Buried Alive: The Clay in Andrew Goodman's Hand Reveals Murder<br /><br />The clay found packed inside Andrew Goodman’s hand suggests a final, desperate struggle and a burial rushed and close to the surface. Three civil rights workers vanished on a thirty-five mile drive, a watch stopped at 12:45, and a burned-out station wagon was found fifty feet from the road - but how did clay end up in his hand and what does it reveal about his last moments?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the June 21, 1964 arrest to the discovery of the burned station wagon and the bodies, and we follow how local law enforcement and the Ku Klux Klan intersected with that night’s violence to leave questions about motive and responsibility unresolved. What does the forensic detail in Goodman's hand change about how we understand what happened?<br /><br />Date: June 21, 1964<br />Location: Neshoba County, Mississippi<br />Persons: Michael Schwerner, James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, Sheriff Lawrence Rainey, Deputy Cecil Price, Edgar Killen<br />Distance: 35 miles (drive from Meridian to Mount Zion)<br />Discovery: Station wagon burned 50 feet from road near Bogue Chitto Creek<br /><br />- Three men left Meridian in a station wagon on the morning of June 21, 1964 for a 35-mile round trip to Mount Zion.<br />- A watch stopped at 12:45 p.m. was recovered in connection with the case.<br />- The station wagon was found burned to bare metal roughly 50 feet from the road outside Philadelphia, Mississippi.<br />- Michael Schwerner was 24, James Chaney was 20, and Andrew Goodman was 20 at the time they disappeared.<br />- Deputy Cecil Price released the three from jail at approximately 10:30 p.m.; Price’s patrol car is unaccounted for during a roughly 60-minute period that night.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879097</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:42 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879097/0616.mp3" length="27232812" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Buried Alive: The Clay in Andrew Goodman's Hand Reveals Murder&#13;
&#13;
The clay found packed inside Andrew Goodman’s hand suggests a final, desperate struggle and a burial rushed and close to the surface. Three civil rights workers vanished on a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Buried Alive: The Clay in Andrew Goodman's Hand Reveals Murder<br /><br />The clay found packed inside Andrew Goodman’s hand suggests a final, desperate struggle and a burial rushed and close to the surface. Three civil rights workers vanished on a thirty-five mile drive, a watch stopped at 12:45, and a burned-out station wagon was found fifty feet from the road - but how did clay end up in his hand and what does it reveal about his last moments?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the June 21, 1964 arrest to the discovery of the burned station wagon and the bodies, and we follow how local law enforcement and the Ku Klux Klan intersected with that night’s violence to leave questions about motive and responsibility unresolved. What does the forensic detail in Goodman's hand change about how we understand what happened?<br /><br />Date: June 21, 1964<br />Location: Neshoba County, Mississippi<br />Persons: Michael Schwerner, James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, Sheriff Lawrence Rainey, Deputy Cecil Price, Edgar Killen<br />Distance: 35 miles (drive from Meridian to Mount Zion)<br />Discovery: Station wagon burned 50 feet from road near Bogue Chitto Creek<br /><br />- Three men left Meridian in a station wagon on the morning of June 21, 1964 for a 35-mile round trip to Mount Zion.<br />- A watch stopped at 12:45 p.m. was recovered in connection with the case.<br />- The station wagon was found burned to bare metal roughly 50 feet from the road outside Philadelphia, Mississippi.<br />- Michael Schwerner was 24, James Chaney was 20, and Andrew Goodman was 20 at the time they disappeared.<br />- Deputy Cecil Price released the three from jail at approximately 10:30 p.m.; Price’s patrol car is unaccounted for during a roughly 60-minute period that night.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1703</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Man Who Faked Madness: How a Boss Outsmarted the Law</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-man-who-faked-madness-how-a-boss-outsmarted-the-law--72879096</link><description><![CDATA[The Man Who Faked Madness: How a Boss Outsmarted the Law<br /><br />The sight of a robed, muttering man in Greenwich Village hid a three-decade performance that collapsed trials and rewrote what prosecutors believed about competence; how did Vincent Gigante keep a nation’s most feared crime family running while convincing courts he was legally insane?<br /><br />In this episode, I tell the story of Vincent Gigante’s public act and the private power it concealed, following surveillance, courtroom delays, and the patterns that finally exposed the ruse-could decades of staged incompetence really fool judges, psychiatrists, and the FBI?<br /><br />Person: Vincent Gigante<br />Location: Sullivan Street, Greenwich Village, New York<br />Case: Genovese crime family leadership<br />Arrest date: May 1990<br />Conviction year: 1997<br /><br />- Gigante walked the streets in a bathrobe and pajamas for roughly thirty years.<br />- He was arrested in May of 1990 at age 61.<br />- He was committed to psychiatric facilities six times, beginning in 1969.<br />- Detective Tom Bruno began focused surveillance on Sullivan Street in 1984 and logged hundreds of hours.<br />- In 2003, Gigante admitted under oath that his mental illness was entirely a performance.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879096</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:38 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879096/0615.mp3" length="28874556" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Man Who Faked Madness: How a Boss Outsmarted the Law&#13;
&#13;
The sight of a robed, muttering man in Greenwich Village hid a three-decade performance that collapsed trials and rewrote what prosecutors believed about competence; how did Vincent Gigante...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Man Who Faked Madness: How a Boss Outsmarted the Law<br /><br />The sight of a robed, muttering man in Greenwich Village hid a three-decade performance that collapsed trials and rewrote what prosecutors believed about competence; how did Vincent Gigante keep a nation’s most feared crime family running while convincing courts he was legally insane?<br /><br />In this episode, I tell the story of Vincent Gigante’s public act and the private power it concealed, following surveillance, courtroom delays, and the patterns that finally exposed the ruse-could decades of staged incompetence really fool judges, psychiatrists, and the FBI?<br /><br />Person: Vincent Gigante<br />Location: Sullivan Street, Greenwich Village, New York<br />Case: Genovese crime family leadership<br />Arrest date: May 1990<br />Conviction year: 1997<br /><br />- Gigante walked the streets in a bathrobe and pajamas for roughly thirty years.<br />- He was arrested in May of 1990 at age 61.<br />- He was committed to psychiatric facilities six times, beginning in 1969.<br />- Detective Tom Bruno began focused surveillance on Sullivan Street in 1984 and logged hundreds of hours.<br />- In 2003, Gigante admitted under oath that his mental illness was entirely a performance.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1805</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Stole Pokémon Cards - Why a 12-Year-Old Refused Freedom</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-stole-pokemon-cards-why-a-12-year-old-refused-freedom--72879095</link><description><![CDATA[He Stole Pokémon Cards - Why a 12-Year-Old Refused Freedom<br /><br />A twelve-year-old sits in a secure unit in England serving eight months for stealing a pack of trading cards, surrounded by modern walls, a TV that turns off at eleven, and two hours alone each night before lockdown. The system spends £3,000 per week to house him, yet he tells a camera at four months in that he is not “I made a mistake” but “I am a bad person.” How did confinement and routine convince a child to refuse the very freedom the unit exists to restore?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of Paul’s sentence and daily life inside a secure unit designed for the most vulnerable children, and we consider what four remaining months can - or cannot - change about how he sees himself. What happens in the hours alone, on a bed, thinking until the television goes dark?<br /><br />Person: Paul<br />Age: 12<br />Sentence: 8 months<br />Cost per week: £3,000<br />Reconviction rate: 84% within two years<br /><br />- Paul describes himself in three words at four months: "I am a bad person."<br />- The unit provides a staff ratio sometimes close to one adult per child.<br />- Lockdown begins at 9 p.m.; the television turns off at 11 p.m., leaving two hours alone before it cuts out.<br />- Dinner is served around a quarter to eleven.<br />- England and Wales incarcerate approximately 3,500 minors, with 84% reconvicted within two years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879095</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:34 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879095/0614.mp3" length="24941978" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Stole Pokémon Cards - Why a 12-Year-Old Refused Freedom&#13;
&#13;
A twelve-year-old sits in a secure unit in England serving eight months for stealing a pack of trading cards, surrounded by modern walls, a TV that turns off at eleven, and two hours alone...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Stole Pokémon Cards - Why a 12-Year-Old Refused Freedom<br /><br />A twelve-year-old sits in a secure unit in England serving eight months for stealing a pack of trading cards, surrounded by modern walls, a TV that turns off at eleven, and two hours alone each night before lockdown. The system spends £3,000 per week to house him, yet he tells a camera at four months in that he is not “I made a mistake” but “I am a bad person.” How did confinement and routine convince a child to refuse the very freedom the unit exists to restore?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of Paul’s sentence and daily life inside a secure unit designed for the most vulnerable children, and we consider what four remaining months can - or cannot - change about how he sees himself. What happens in the hours alone, on a bed, thinking until the television goes dark?<br /><br />Person: Paul<br />Age: 12<br />Sentence: 8 months<br />Cost per week: £3,000<br />Reconviction rate: 84% within two years<br /><br />- Paul describes himself in three words at four months: "I am a bad person."<br />- The unit provides a staff ratio sometimes close to one adult per child.<br />- Lockdown begins at 9 p.m.; the television turns off at 11 p.m., leaving two hours alone before it cuts out.<br />- Dinner is served around a quarter to eleven.<br />- England and Wales incarcerate approximately 3,500 minors, with 84% reconvicted within two years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1559</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Night Two Wardens Vanished: Inside Claude Dallas's Cold Trap</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-night-two-wardens-vanished-inside-claude-dallas-s-cold-trap--72879094</link><description><![CDATA[The Night Two Wardens Vanished: Inside Claude Dallas's Cold Trap<br /><br />A cold January night in 1981 ended with two game wardens gone-one in a shallow grave 15 miles outside town, the other trapped on a submerged branch and spotted from a news helicopter days later. Claude Dallas surrendered one revolver, kept another concealed, and walked away to a story that still refuses to make sense-how did two men disappear from a camp with a witness whose back was turned?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of that night: the call from the 45 Ranch, the wardens’ three a.m. drive into Bull Basin, the discovery of out-of-season bobcat pelts, and the lone account from Jim Stephens that leaves critical gaps. What choices and past conflicts led to two officers never driving out?<br /><br />Person: Claude Dallas<br />Person: Bill Pogue<br />Person: Connally Elms<br />Date: January 4-5, 1981<br />Location: Bull Basin, southwestern Idaho<br /><br />- Two wardens arrived at Claude Dallas’s camp at approximately 3:00 a.m. on January 5, 1981.<br />- One warden, Connally Elms, was later found dead in a river caught on a submerged branch days after the incident.<br />- The other warden, Bill Pogue, was found buried in a shallow grave fifteen miles outside a Nevada desert town.<br />- Claude Dallas surrendered one .357 revolver when asked but concealed a second .357 on his body.<br />- Jim Stephens, Dallas’s friend, was present that night with his back turned and later could not confirm whether a warden had drawn a weapon.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879094</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879094/0613.mp3" length="28003111" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Night Two Wardens Vanished: Inside Claude Dallas's Cold Trap&#13;
&#13;
A cold January night in 1981 ended with two game wardens gone-one in a shallow grave 15 miles outside town, the other trapped on a submerged branch and spotted from a news helicopter...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Night Two Wardens Vanished: Inside Claude Dallas's Cold Trap<br /><br />A cold January night in 1981 ended with two game wardens gone-one in a shallow grave 15 miles outside town, the other trapped on a submerged branch and spotted from a news helicopter days later. Claude Dallas surrendered one revolver, kept another concealed, and walked away to a story that still refuses to make sense-how did two men disappear from a camp with a witness whose back was turned?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of that night: the call from the 45 Ranch, the wardens’ three a.m. drive into Bull Basin, the discovery of out-of-season bobcat pelts, and the lone account from Jim Stephens that leaves critical gaps. What choices and past conflicts led to two officers never driving out?<br /><br />Person: Claude Dallas<br />Person: Bill Pogue<br />Person: Connally Elms<br />Date: January 4-5, 1981<br />Location: Bull Basin, southwestern Idaho<br /><br />- Two wardens arrived at Claude Dallas’s camp at approximately 3:00 a.m. on January 5, 1981.<br />- One warden, Connally Elms, was later found dead in a river caught on a submerged branch days after the incident.<br />- The other warden, Bill Pogue, was found buried in a shallow grave fifteen miles outside a Nevada desert town.<br />- Claude Dallas surrendered one .357 revolver when asked but concealed a second .357 on his body.<br />- Jim Stephens, Dallas’s friend, was present that night with his back turned and later could not confirm whether a warden had drawn a weapon.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1751</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>When Your Unlocked Door Is Enough: The Night Stalker's Random Terror</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/when-your-unlocked-door-is-enough-the-night-stalker-s-random-terror--72879093</link><description><![CDATA[When Your Unlocked Door Is Enough: The Night Stalker's Random Terror<br /><br />An ordinary unlocked door became a death sentence: on March 17, 1985 a woman was shot in her kitchen while putting away groceries, and thirty minutes later a law student was shot three miles away - the same gun, no motive, no robbery. How does a city stop sleeping when a killer chooses doors at random and leaves no reason anyone can name?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the first five months of 1985 across Rosemead, Monterey Park and Whittier to show how detectives traced a pattern of randomness and escalation, and why an unlocked door became the only commonality that connected multiple scenes.<br /><br />Person: Dale Okazaki<br />Date: March 17, 1985<br />Location: Rosemead<br />Person: Tsai Lianne Yu<br />Person: Vincent Zazzara<br /><br />- Dale Okazaki, age 34, was shot once in the head in her kitchen while putting away groceries.<br />- Maria Hernandez, age 22, was struck in the palm by a bullet that deflected off her keys the same night.<br />- Tsai Lianne Yu, age 30 and a law student, was shot twice in the chest thirty minutes and three miles from Rosemead.<br />- Ten days later, on March 27, 1985, Vincent Zazzara, age 64, was shot in bed in Whittier and his wife Maxine, age 44, was shot and stabbed with her eyes removed.<br />- Richard Ramirez was born in 1960 in El Paso, Texas, and had a cousin named Mike who showed him photographs of women who had been raped and killed overseas.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879093</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:27 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879093/0612.mp3" length="28691908" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>When Your Unlocked Door Is Enough: The Night Stalker's Random Terror&#13;
&#13;
An ordinary unlocked door became a death sentence: on March 17, 1985 a woman was shot in her kitchen while putting away groceries, and thirty minutes later a law student was shot...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[When Your Unlocked Door Is Enough: The Night Stalker's Random Terror<br /><br />An ordinary unlocked door became a death sentence: on March 17, 1985 a woman was shot in her kitchen while putting away groceries, and thirty minutes later a law student was shot three miles away - the same gun, no motive, no robbery. How does a city stop sleeping when a killer chooses doors at random and leaves no reason anyone can name?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the first five months of 1985 across Rosemead, Monterey Park and Whittier to show how detectives traced a pattern of randomness and escalation, and why an unlocked door became the only commonality that connected multiple scenes.<br /><br />Person: Dale Okazaki<br />Date: March 17, 1985<br />Location: Rosemead<br />Person: Tsai Lianne Yu<br />Person: Vincent Zazzara<br /><br />- Dale Okazaki, age 34, was shot once in the head in her kitchen while putting away groceries.<br />- Maria Hernandez, age 22, was struck in the palm by a bullet that deflected off her keys the same night.<br />- Tsai Lianne Yu, age 30 and a law student, was shot twice in the chest thirty minutes and three miles from Rosemead.<br />- Ten days later, on March 27, 1985, Vincent Zazzara, age 64, was shot in bed in Whittier and his wife Maxine, age 44, was shot and stabbed with her eyes removed.<br />- Richard Ramirez was born in 1960 in El Paso, Texas, and had a cousin named Mike who showed him photographs of women who had been raped and killed overseas.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1794</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The First Joke That Blew Up: Inside the Unabomber's Beginning</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-first-joke-that-blew-up-inside-the-unabomber-s-beginning--72879092</link><description><![CDATA[The First Joke That Blew Up: Inside the Unabomber's Beginning<br /><br />A security guard joked that a misdelivered package might be a bomb - then it detonated in his hands, leaving only a laceration and shock while setting off a 17-year campaign of terror. Across 16 devices in 12 states, three people would be killed and 23 maimed; what began with that offhand quip hid a single sentence that would later break the case. Who wrote that sentence, and how did one brilliant mind turn into an invisible killer?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the first mailed device, the trajectory of the attacker from Harvard prodigy to isolated cabin, and the sequence of events that linked two bombs at the same university one year apart - a timeline that raises the question of what clue finally ended the manhunt.<br /><br />Person: Theodore John Kaczynski<br />Date (first bombing): May 25, 1978<br />Location (first device): Northwestern University parking lot<br />Duration (campaign): 17 years<br />Devices: 16<br /><br />- The first device detonated in the hands of security guard Terry Marker on May 25, 1978, causing a laceration and shock.<br />- The campaign spanned 17 years, across 12 states, using 16 mailed or placed devices.<br />- The attacks killed three people and maimed 23 others over the course of the campaign.<br />- Theodore Kaczynski was born in 1942, tested above IQ 170, entered Harvard at 16, and earned a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan at 19.<br />- In 1971 Kaczynski bought 1.5 acres outside Lincoln, Montana, and lived in an 8-by-10-foot cabin with no electricity, phone, or running water.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879092</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879092/0611.mp3" length="28833596" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The First Joke That Blew Up: Inside the Unabomber's Beginning&#13;
&#13;
A security guard joked that a misdelivered package might be a bomb - then it detonated in his hands, leaving only a laceration and shock while setting off a 17-year campaign of terror....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The First Joke That Blew Up: Inside the Unabomber's Beginning<br /><br />A security guard joked that a misdelivered package might be a bomb - then it detonated in his hands, leaving only a laceration and shock while setting off a 17-year campaign of terror. Across 16 devices in 12 states, three people would be killed and 23 maimed; what began with that offhand quip hid a single sentence that would later break the case. Who wrote that sentence, and how did one brilliant mind turn into an invisible killer?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the first mailed device, the trajectory of the attacker from Harvard prodigy to isolated cabin, and the sequence of events that linked two bombs at the same university one year apart - a timeline that raises the question of what clue finally ended the manhunt.<br /><br />Person: Theodore John Kaczynski<br />Date (first bombing): May 25, 1978<br />Location (first device): Northwestern University parking lot<br />Duration (campaign): 17 years<br />Devices: 16<br /><br />- The first device detonated in the hands of security guard Terry Marker on May 25, 1978, causing a laceration and shock.<br />- The campaign spanned 17 years, across 12 states, using 16 mailed or placed devices.<br />- The attacks killed three people and maimed 23 others over the course of the campaign.<br />- Theodore Kaczynski was born in 1942, tested above IQ 170, entered Harvard at 16, and earned a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan at 19.<br />- In 1971 Kaczynski bought 1.5 acres outside Lincoln, Montana, and lived in an 8-by-10-foot cabin with no electricity, phone, or running water.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1803</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>"She's a blonde": The Night New York's Rules Failed</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-s-a-blonde-the-night-new-york-s-rules-failed--72879090</link><description><![CDATA["She's a blonde": The Night New York's Rules Failed<br /><br />The city thought it knew how to stay alive: avoid dark hair, avoid parked cars, trust the profile. But one offhand phrase-“she’s a blonde”-was a decision that lasted less than forty-eight hours and shattered the logic New Yorkers had relied on. How did a single sentence become the hinge between false safety and murder?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the thirteen months that changed New York, from the first killing on July 29, 1976 to the arrest that followed, and explore the facts and failures that let a pattern become a massacre. What drove David Berkowitz, and did anyone truly understand him before it was too late?<br /><br />Person: David Richard Berkowitz (born Richard David Falco)<br />Date: July 29, 1976<br />Event: First known shooting of Donna Lauria in a parked car in the Bronx<br />Weapon: .44 Caliber Charter Arms Bulldog revolver acquired in Texas<br />Fires logged: 1,488 fires recorded in Berkowitz’s diary before shootings began<br /><br />- Donna Lauria, age 18, was killed on the night of July 29, 1976 while seated in a parked car outside her Bronx apartment.<br />- Jody Valenti, age 19, sat beside Donna and was wounded in the same July 29, 1976 attack.<br />- David Berkowitz was born June 1, 1953 and was given up for adoption at birth.<br />- Berkowitz had kept a diary documenting 1,488 fires set around New York before he ever fired the .44 revolver.<br />- The .44 Charter Arms Bulldog was purchased in Texas by acquaintance Bill Parker because Berkowitz lacked a Texas driver’s license.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879090</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879090/0610.mp3" length="29252391" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>"She's a blonde": The Night New York's Rules Failed&#13;
&#13;
The city thought it knew how to stay alive: avoid dark hair, avoid parked cars, trust the profile. But one offhand phrase-“she’s a blonde”-was a decision that lasted less than forty-eight hours...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA["She's a blonde": The Night New York's Rules Failed<br /><br />The city thought it knew how to stay alive: avoid dark hair, avoid parked cars, trust the profile. But one offhand phrase-“she’s a blonde”-was a decision that lasted less than forty-eight hours and shattered the logic New Yorkers had relied on. How did a single sentence become the hinge between false safety and murder?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the thirteen months that changed New York, from the first killing on July 29, 1976 to the arrest that followed, and explore the facts and failures that let a pattern become a massacre. What drove David Berkowitz, and did anyone truly understand him before it was too late?<br /><br />Person: David Richard Berkowitz (born Richard David Falco)<br />Date: July 29, 1976<br />Event: First known shooting of Donna Lauria in a parked car in the Bronx<br />Weapon: .44 Caliber Charter Arms Bulldog revolver acquired in Texas<br />Fires logged: 1,488 fires recorded in Berkowitz’s diary before shootings began<br /><br />- Donna Lauria, age 18, was killed on the night of July 29, 1976 while seated in a parked car outside her Bronx apartment.<br />- Jody Valenti, age 19, sat beside Donna and was wounded in the same July 29, 1976 attack.<br />- David Berkowitz was born June 1, 1953 and was given up for adoption at birth.<br />- Berkowitz had kept a diary documenting 1,488 fires set around New York before he ever fired the .44 revolver.<br />- The .44 Charter Arms Bulldog was purchased in Texas by acquaintance Bill Parker because Berkowitz lacked a Texas driver’s license.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1829</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Neighbor Who Hid Fifteen Corpses: Inside Dennis Nilsen's Smile</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-neighbor-who-hid-fifteen-corpses-inside-dennis-nilsen-s-smile--72879089</link><description><![CDATA[The Neighbor Who Hid Fifteen Corpses: Inside Dennis Nilsen's Smile<br /><br />A tidy job-centre officer, a steady schedule and a drain clogged with flesh: when a plumber found three-inch pieces of meat and knuckle bones in a Muswell Hill pipe, the smell had been blamed on plumbing for weeks. The man who answered the door calmly corrected police that there were not one or two bodies but closer to fifteen-how did ordinary routine hide systematic murder for years?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the February 9, 1983 discovery through the earlier killings, detailing the scenes, methods and life events that coincide with the crimes, and ask how the smallest domestic signs concealed the largest of atrocities.<br /><br />Date: February 9, 1983<br />Location: 23 Cranley Gardens, Muswell Hill, North London<br />Person: Dennis Andrew Nilsen<br />Age: 37<br />First identified victim: Stephen Holmes (14 at time of death)<br /><br />- A plumber, Michael Cattran, lifted a drain cover and found four pieces of flesh ~3 inches long plus knuckle bones.<br />- Detective Chief Inspector Jay was at 23 Cranley Gardens by 5:30 p.m. the same day the drain evidence was reported.<br />- Dennis Nilsen told police he believed the number of victims was "closer to fifteen, maybe sixteen."<br />- Nilsen was born in 1945 in Fraserburgh and enlisted in the Army Catering Corps at about age 15, serving eleven years.<br />- Stephen Holmes was killed on January 1, 1979, kept a week, stored under the floorboards for eight months, and was identified as Nilsen's first victim in 2005.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879089</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:16 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879089/0609.mp3" length="27902383" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Neighbor Who Hid Fifteen Corpses: Inside Dennis Nilsen's Smile&#13;
&#13;
A tidy job-centre officer, a steady schedule and a drain clogged with flesh: when a plumber found three-inch pieces of meat and knuckle bones in a Muswell Hill pipe, the smell had...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Neighbor Who Hid Fifteen Corpses: Inside Dennis Nilsen's Smile<br /><br />A tidy job-centre officer, a steady schedule and a drain clogged with flesh: when a plumber found three-inch pieces of meat and knuckle bones in a Muswell Hill pipe, the smell had been blamed on plumbing for weeks. The man who answered the door calmly corrected police that there were not one or two bodies but closer to fifteen-how did ordinary routine hide systematic murder for years?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the February 9, 1983 discovery through the earlier killings, detailing the scenes, methods and life events that coincide with the crimes, and ask how the smallest domestic signs concealed the largest of atrocities.<br /><br />Date: February 9, 1983<br />Location: 23 Cranley Gardens, Muswell Hill, North London<br />Person: Dennis Andrew Nilsen<br />Age: 37<br />First identified victim: Stephen Holmes (14 at time of death)<br /><br />- A plumber, Michael Cattran, lifted a drain cover and found four pieces of flesh ~3 inches long plus knuckle bones.<br />- Detective Chief Inspector Jay was at 23 Cranley Gardens by 5:30 p.m. the same day the drain evidence was reported.<br />- Dennis Nilsen told police he believed the number of victims was "closer to fifteen, maybe sixteen."<br />- Nilsen was born in 1945 in Fraserburgh and enlisted in the Army Catering Corps at about age 15, serving eleven years.<br />- Stephen Holmes was killed on January 1, 1979, kept a week, stored under the floorboards for eight months, and was identified as Nilsen's first victim in 2005.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1744</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Girl Who Vanished Behind the Clubhouse Window</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-girl-who-vanished-behind-the-clubhouse-window--72879088</link><description><![CDATA[The Girl Who Vanished Behind the Clubhouse Window<br /><br />Cold footprints led away from an open furnace-room window the night a five-year-old in a Big Bird sweater disappeared from a crowded Christmas party; two hundred people were inside and not one saw her exit the front door. Investigators found adult shoe prints through frost to a freshly broken chain-link fence and no child-sized prints - so how did Melissa leave the clubhouse?<br /><br />In this episode, you’ll hear the facts of what happened on December 3, 1989 at Woodside Apartments in Lorton, Virginia: who was there, what the scene looked like, and the physical evidence that contradicted every eyewitness account. We lay out the central mystery - a girl vanishing in seconds from a room full of neighbors - and follow the trail investigators could not explain.<br /><br />Person: Melissa Brennan<br />Date: December 3, 1989<br />Location: Woodside Apartments clubhouse, Lorton, Virginia<br />Event: Christmas party with roughly 200 attendees<br />Physical evidence: adult footprints from furnace-room window to broken chain-link fence; no child-sized prints<br /><br />- Melissa was five years old, weighed 48 pounds, and wore a dark navy Big Bird sweater, red plaid skirt, red tights, and a pink parka.<br />- Approximately 200 residents and families attended the clubhouse Christmas party that night.<br />- Tami Brennan, Melissa’s mother, had taught Melissa their phone number by heart and kept it unchanged.<br />- The clubhouse front door opened directly into the crowded entry and no witness reported seeing Melissa walk out that exit.<br />- Investigators found adult footprints in thin frost leading from an open furnace-room window to a freshly broken top rail of a chain-link fence, with footprints continuing toward the parking lot and no child-sized prints along that path.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879088</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:12 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879088/0608.mp3" length="28260156" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Girl Who Vanished Behind the Clubhouse Window&#13;
&#13;
Cold footprints led away from an open furnace-room window the night a five-year-old in a Big Bird sweater disappeared from a crowded Christmas party; two hundred people were inside and not one saw...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Girl Who Vanished Behind the Clubhouse Window<br /><br />Cold footprints led away from an open furnace-room window the night a five-year-old in a Big Bird sweater disappeared from a crowded Christmas party; two hundred people were inside and not one saw her exit the front door. Investigators found adult shoe prints through frost to a freshly broken chain-link fence and no child-sized prints - so how did Melissa leave the clubhouse?<br /><br />In this episode, you’ll hear the facts of what happened on December 3, 1989 at Woodside Apartments in Lorton, Virginia: who was there, what the scene looked like, and the physical evidence that contradicted every eyewitness account. We lay out the central mystery - a girl vanishing in seconds from a room full of neighbors - and follow the trail investigators could not explain.<br /><br />Person: Melissa Brennan<br />Date: December 3, 1989<br />Location: Woodside Apartments clubhouse, Lorton, Virginia<br />Event: Christmas party with roughly 200 attendees<br />Physical evidence: adult footprints from furnace-room window to broken chain-link fence; no child-sized prints<br /><br />- Melissa was five years old, weighed 48 pounds, and wore a dark navy Big Bird sweater, red plaid skirt, red tights, and a pink parka.<br />- Approximately 200 residents and families attended the clubhouse Christmas party that night.<br />- Tami Brennan, Melissa’s mother, had taught Melissa their phone number by heart and kept it unchanged.<br />- The clubhouse front door opened directly into the crowded entry and no witness reported seeing Melissa walk out that exit.<br />- Investigators found adult footprints in thin frost leading from an open furnace-room window to a freshly broken top rail of a chain-link fence, with footprints continuing toward the parking lot and no child-sized prints along that path.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1767</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Rolex That Kept Ticking: The Man Nobody Could Identify</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-rolex-that-kept-ticking-the-man-nobody-could-identify--72879087</link><description><![CDATA[The Rolex That Kept Ticking: The Man Nobody Could Identify<br /><br />A dead man surfaced eight miles off the Devon coast fully dressed, with a Rolex still ticking and every pocket emptied of identity - the wallet gone but the watch intact. Who would deliberately place a body in deep water, strip away every clue, yet leave a timepiece that led investigators to a name no one could find?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the discovery, the forensic currents analysis, and the odd trail the Rolex produced as detectives try to answer who the dead man was and why his identity had been stolen.<br /><br />Person: Ronald Joseph Platt<br />Date: July 28, 1996<br />Location: ten kilometers off the Devon coastline<br />Watch serial number: 154402<br />Suspect alias: Albert Walker<br /><br />- The body was found curled among fish in a net hauled by John Copik and his son eight miles off Brixham Harbour.<br />- The deceased was estimated to be about 40-45 years old and was wearing corduroy trousers, a shirt, leather shoes, a gold chain, and a Rolex.<br />- All of the man's pockets had been turned inside out and contained nothing; the underwear was made in the United States and the trousers were manufactured in Canada.<br />- Oceanographer Dr. Bob Allen concluded the body could not have drifted outward from shore given prevailing winds and lack of rain; it had been placed in deep water deliberately.<br />- The Rolex was traced by police to a 1967 purchase in Germany, registered to Ronald Joseph Platt, whose listed home showed bills and child registrations but whose identity at that address was used by a man later identified as Canadian Albert Walker.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879087</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879087/0607.mp3" length="23597403" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Rolex That Kept Ticking: The Man Nobody Could Identify&#13;
&#13;
A dead man surfaced eight miles off the Devon coast fully dressed, with a Rolex still ticking and every pocket emptied of identity - the wallet gone but the watch intact. Who would...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Rolex That Kept Ticking: The Man Nobody Could Identify<br /><br />A dead man surfaced eight miles off the Devon coast fully dressed, with a Rolex still ticking and every pocket emptied of identity - the wallet gone but the watch intact. Who would deliberately place a body in deep water, strip away every clue, yet leave a timepiece that led investigators to a name no one could find?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the discovery, the forensic currents analysis, and the odd trail the Rolex produced as detectives try to answer who the dead man was and why his identity had been stolen.<br /><br />Person: Ronald Joseph Platt<br />Date: July 28, 1996<br />Location: ten kilometers off the Devon coastline<br />Watch serial number: 154402<br />Suspect alias: Albert Walker<br /><br />- The body was found curled among fish in a net hauled by John Copik and his son eight miles off Brixham Harbour.<br />- The deceased was estimated to be about 40-45 years old and was wearing corduroy trousers, a shirt, leather shoes, a gold chain, and a Rolex.<br />- All of the man's pockets had been turned inside out and contained nothing; the underwear was made in the United States and the trousers were manufactured in Canada.<br />- Oceanographer Dr. Bob Allen concluded the body could not have drifted outward from shore given prevailing winds and lack of rain; it had been placed in deep water deliberately.<br />- The Rolex was traced by police to a 1967 purchase in Germany, registered to Ronald Joseph Platt, whose listed home showed bills and child registrations but whose identity at that address was used by a man later identified as Canadian Albert Walker.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1475</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Said Four Words That Should Have Saved Him - But Died</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-said-four-words-that-should-have-saved-him-but-died--72879086</link><description><![CDATA[He Said Four Words That Should Have Saved Him - But Died<br /><br />A man called his lawyer the day before he died and said four words that should have saved his life: "If I'm dead, you'll know what happened." He was found dead the next day in his Las Vegas mansion, the official cause listed as a fatal combination of heroin and Xanax - but two trials, conflicting forensic opinions, and a buried hoard of silver coins turned his death into a lingering mystery. Who had motive, access, and the last clear warning he gave?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events around the death, the people closest to him, and the contradictory outcomes that followed, from the drug finding to the desert theft; could those four words have been the only clue that mattered?<br /><br />Person: Ted Binion<br />Date: September 17, 1998<br />Location: Las Vegas mansion on Palomino Lane<br />Cause: Fatal combination of heroin and Xanax (official)<br />Other person: Sandy Murphy, 26<br /><br />- Ted Binion told the Nevada Gaming Commission he lost his life when his license was revoked and said, "This is my life. I don't know where else to go."<br />- Four days before his death, Sandy Murphy slept with Rick Tabish, a fact she later confirmed.<br />- One day before he died, Binion called his attorney and said, "If I'm dead, you'll know what happened."<br />- Two days after the death, Rick Tabish was arrested at night in the desert shoveling up $5,000,000 in silver coins buried on a private lot.<br />- Tom Loveday, Binion's gardener of 15 years, arrived about 9:00 a.m. the morning of September 17 and noticed Sandy's car parked on the side of the house and the normally open bedroom blinds closed.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879086</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879086/0606.mp3" length="25362863" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Said Four Words That Should Have Saved Him - But Died&#13;
&#13;
A man called his lawyer the day before he died and said four words that should have saved his life: "If I'm dead, you'll know what happened." He was found dead the next day in his Las Vegas...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Said Four Words That Should Have Saved Him - But Died<br /><br />A man called his lawyer the day before he died and said four words that should have saved his life: "If I'm dead, you'll know what happened." He was found dead the next day in his Las Vegas mansion, the official cause listed as a fatal combination of heroin and Xanax - but two trials, conflicting forensic opinions, and a buried hoard of silver coins turned his death into a lingering mystery. Who had motive, access, and the last clear warning he gave?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events around the death, the people closest to him, and the contradictory outcomes that followed, from the drug finding to the desert theft; could those four words have been the only clue that mattered?<br /><br />Person: Ted Binion<br />Date: September 17, 1998<br />Location: Las Vegas mansion on Palomino Lane<br />Cause: Fatal combination of heroin and Xanax (official)<br />Other person: Sandy Murphy, 26<br /><br />- Ted Binion told the Nevada Gaming Commission he lost his life when his license was revoked and said, "This is my life. I don't know where else to go."<br />- Four days before his death, Sandy Murphy slept with Rick Tabish, a fact she later confirmed.<br />- One day before he died, Binion called his attorney and said, "If I'm dead, you'll know what happened."<br />- Two days after the death, Rick Tabish was arrested at night in the desert shoveling up $5,000,000 in silver coins buried on a private lot.<br />- Tom Loveday, Binion's gardener of 15 years, arrived about 9:00 a.m. the morning of September 17 and noticed Sandy's car parked on the side of the house and the normally open bedroom blinds closed.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1586</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bomb That Almost Killed a City - The Forgotten 400-Dollar Clue</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bomb-that-almost-killed-a-city-the-forgotten-400-dollar-clue--72879085</link><description><![CDATA[The Bomb That Almost Killed a City - The Forgotten 400-Dollar Clue<br /><br />A five-story crater, twelve hundred pounds of homemade explosives, and a plan to release cyanide gas that failed only because three hydrogen tanks did not ignite - yet six people still died and fifty thousand were trapped. One small piece of steel and a $400 mistake unraveled a conspiracy that came terrifyingly close to being far worse; how did a ten-dollar decision and four hundred dollars change everything?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the February 26, 1993 explosion beneath a major landmark through the first chaotic hours of rescue and investigation, and we show how a single overlooked detail shifted the entire case - what did that fragment reveal, and who broke the rules to pick it up?<br /><br />Date: February 26, 1993<br />Location: B2 level of the World Trade Center parking garage<br />Explosive weight: 1,200 pounds<br />Immediate deaths: 6<br />People trapped: 50,000<br /><br />- Explosion occurred at 12:18 PM on a Friday.<br />- Crater measured five stories deep and spanned an entire city block wide.<br />- Three hydrogen tanks intended to generate cyanide gas failed to ignite.<br />- Stairwells ran to the 110th floor; some people descended more than 110 flights.<br />- An agent picked up a scorched steel fragment stamped with a sequence of numbers in violation of orders, carried out on a stretcher.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879085</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:49:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879085/0605.mp3" length="28159846" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Bomb That Almost Killed a City - The Forgotten 400-Dollar Clue&#13;
&#13;
A five-story crater, twelve hundred pounds of homemade explosives, and a plan to release cyanide gas that failed only because three hydrogen tanks did not ignite - yet six people...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Bomb That Almost Killed a City - The Forgotten 400-Dollar Clue<br /><br />A five-story crater, twelve hundred pounds of homemade explosives, and a plan to release cyanide gas that failed only because three hydrogen tanks did not ignite - yet six people still died and fifty thousand were trapped. One small piece of steel and a $400 mistake unraveled a conspiracy that came terrifyingly close to being far worse; how did a ten-dollar decision and four hundred dollars change everything?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the February 26, 1993 explosion beneath a major landmark through the first chaotic hours of rescue and investigation, and we show how a single overlooked detail shifted the entire case - what did that fragment reveal, and who broke the rules to pick it up?<br /><br />Date: February 26, 1993<br />Location: B2 level of the World Trade Center parking garage<br />Explosive weight: 1,200 pounds<br />Immediate deaths: 6<br />People trapped: 50,000<br /><br />- Explosion occurred at 12:18 PM on a Friday.<br />- Crater measured five stories deep and spanned an entire city block wide.<br />- Three hydrogen tanks intended to generate cyanide gas failed to ignite.<br />- Stairwells ran to the 110th floor; some people descended more than 110 flights.<br />- An agent picked up a scorched steel fragment stamped with a sequence of numbers in violation of orders, carried out on a stretcher.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1760</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Unidentified Fingerprint That Could Exonerate Darlie Routier</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-unidentified-fingerprint-that-could-exonerate-darlie-routier--72879084</link><description><![CDATA[The Unidentified Fingerprint That Could Exonerate Darlie Routier<br /><br />A single unidentified fingerprint sits in a Texas evidence file that has never been run through the national database, and two boys who might have been saved have been dead for almost thirty years - could that print change everything? The case hinges on a diary entry written exactly one month before June 5, 1996, and a crime scene that seemed to tell two different stories at once; what does the fingerprint really mean for guilt or innocence?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the 911 call at approximately 2:30 a.m. to the discovery of wounds, scene details, and the diary line that prosecutors used at trial, and ask whether the untested print could answer the central question about who entered the house that night.<br /><br />Person: Darlie Routier<br />Date: June 5, 1996<br />Location: 5801 Eagle Drive, Rowlett, Texas<br />Victims: Devon Routier (6 years old), Damon Routier (5 years old)<br />Evidence: untested fingerprint in evidence file<br /><br />- 911 call lasted 4 minutes and 22 seconds and was made at approximately 2:30 a.m.<br />- Devon suffered two stab wounds to the chest, both reaching the heart.<br />- Damon was breathing when found but died at Baylor University Medical Center before dawn.<br />- Darlie had a neck cut that stopped 1 millimeter from the carotid artery and a forearm stab wound reaching bone.<br />- In the month before the killings, Darlie wrote in her diary that she hoped her sons would forgive her for what she was about to do.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879084</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:57 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879084/0604.mp3" length="24812828" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Unidentified Fingerprint That Could Exonerate Darlie Routier&#13;
&#13;
A single unidentified fingerprint sits in a Texas evidence file that has never been run through the national database, and two boys who might have been saved have been dead for almost...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Unidentified Fingerprint That Could Exonerate Darlie Routier<br /><br />A single unidentified fingerprint sits in a Texas evidence file that has never been run through the national database, and two boys who might have been saved have been dead for almost thirty years - could that print change everything? The case hinges on a diary entry written exactly one month before June 5, 1996, and a crime scene that seemed to tell two different stories at once; what does the fingerprint really mean for guilt or innocence?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the 911 call at approximately 2:30 a.m. to the discovery of wounds, scene details, and the diary line that prosecutors used at trial, and ask whether the untested print could answer the central question about who entered the house that night.<br /><br />Person: Darlie Routier<br />Date: June 5, 1996<br />Location: 5801 Eagle Drive, Rowlett, Texas<br />Victims: Devon Routier (6 years old), Damon Routier (5 years old)<br />Evidence: untested fingerprint in evidence file<br /><br />- 911 call lasted 4 minutes and 22 seconds and was made at approximately 2:30 a.m.<br />- Devon suffered two stab wounds to the chest, both reaching the heart.<br />- Damon was breathing when found but died at Baylor University Medical Center before dawn.<br />- Darlie had a neck cut that stopped 1 millimeter from the carotid artery and a forearm stab wound reaching bone.<br />- In the month before the killings, Darlie wrote in her diary that she hoped her sons would forgive her for what she was about to do.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1551</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>When a Car Won't Start: The Ordinary Day That Turned Deadly</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/when-a-car-won-t-start-the-ordinary-day-that-turned-deadly--72879082</link><description><![CDATA[When a Car Won't Start: The Ordinary Day That Turned Deadly<br /><br />A routine engine failure may have been the single mechanical detail that changed everything on August 19, 1987 - a day when a licensed shooter, dressed in camouflage and carrying ballistic vests, walked from a forest clearing into a market town and left sixteen people dead. How could a man with no criminal record, no known grievance, and a life spent in one small town trigger such ordinary places to become sites of horror?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of that day from the commons and Savernake Forest to a petrol station and a school, tracing Michael Robert Ryan’s movements, possessions, and the survivors’ memories to ask whether one failed engine altered the course of history. What happened between a stalled start and an unstoppable sequence of violence?<br /><br />Date: August 19, 1987<br />Person: Michael Robert Ryan, aged 27<br />Location: Hungerford, Berkshire, England<br />Casualties: sixteen people dead by the time of Ryan’s suicide<br />Items: nine-millimeter pistol, ballistic vests, camouflage, balaclava, hunting knives<br /><br />- Michael Robert Ryan was born in May 1960 and was 27 years old on August 19, 1987.<br />- Hungerford’s population was around five thousand on the morning of the attack.<br />- At noon Ryan drove to Savernake Forest, roughly ten miles west of Hungerford.<br />- Susan Godfrey, aged 33, was found shot near the base of a tree after being taken into the trees.<br />- At 6:45 p.m. a police negotiator asked Ryan if he had any final questions; he asked the time, then shot himself with a nine-millimeter pistol.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879082</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:54 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879082/0603.mp3" length="23602419" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>When a Car Won't Start: The Ordinary Day That Turned Deadly&#13;
&#13;
A routine engine failure may have been the single mechanical detail that changed everything on August 19, 1987 - a day when a licensed shooter, dressed in camouflage and carrying ballistic...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[When a Car Won't Start: The Ordinary Day That Turned Deadly<br /><br />A routine engine failure may have been the single mechanical detail that changed everything on August 19, 1987 - a day when a licensed shooter, dressed in camouflage and carrying ballistic vests, walked from a forest clearing into a market town and left sixteen people dead. How could a man with no criminal record, no known grievance, and a life spent in one small town trigger such ordinary places to become sites of horror?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of that day from the commons and Savernake Forest to a petrol station and a school, tracing Michael Robert Ryan’s movements, possessions, and the survivors’ memories to ask whether one failed engine altered the course of history. What happened between a stalled start and an unstoppable sequence of violence?<br /><br />Date: August 19, 1987<br />Person: Michael Robert Ryan, aged 27<br />Location: Hungerford, Berkshire, England<br />Casualties: sixteen people dead by the time of Ryan’s suicide<br />Items: nine-millimeter pistol, ballistic vests, camouflage, balaclava, hunting knives<br /><br />- Michael Robert Ryan was born in May 1960 and was 27 years old on August 19, 1987.<br />- Hungerford’s population was around five thousand on the morning of the attack.<br />- At noon Ryan drove to Savernake Forest, roughly ten miles west of Hungerford.<br />- Susan Godfrey, aged 33, was found shot near the base of a tree after being taken into the trees.<br />- At 6:45 p.m. a police negotiator asked Ryan if he had any final questions; he asked the time, then shot himself with a nine-millimeter pistol.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1476</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Mirrors, Rifles, and a Quiet Town: Inside the Wilkes-Barre Massacre</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/mirrors-rifles-and-a-quiet-town-inside-the-wilkes-barre-massacre--72879081</link><description><![CDATA[Mirrors, Rifles, and a Quiet Town: Inside the Wilkes-Barre Massacre<br /><br />A man walked out at 2:30 a.m. carrying an AR-15 after thirteen people were already dead across Wilkes-Barre, and he spent hours barricaded with mirrors facing outward - was he watching for police, or something else? This episode follows the staggering facts of September 25, 1982, and the single unnerving question that refuses a tidy answer.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events, the people who lived on Schoolhouse Lane, and the hours that followed the killings, closing on the unresolved motives behind the mirrors and the shootings that shocked a coal-region city. What can the details of one day reveal about the mind that planned it?<br /><br />Date: September 25, 1982<br />Person: George Emile Banks<br />Location: Schoolhouse Lane, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania<br />Victims: 13 dead (including six children killed by Banks)<br />Standoff duration: about four hours<br /><br />- Banks was 40 years old at the time of the shootings.<br />- Banks had killed six of his own children.<br />- Banks was arrested and handcuffed by 11:17 a.m. the same morning.<br />- Banks had been sent home on medical leave from the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill the summer before for psychiatric evaluation.<br />- Banks had placed mirrors around the building where he barricaded himself, facing outward.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879081</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:50 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879081/0602.mp3" length="26917253" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Mirrors, Rifles, and a Quiet Town: Inside the Wilkes-Barre Massacre&#13;
&#13;
A man walked out at 2:30 a.m. carrying an AR-15 after thirteen people were already dead across Wilkes-Barre, and he spent hours barricaded with mirrors facing outward - was he...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Mirrors, Rifles, and a Quiet Town: Inside the Wilkes-Barre Massacre<br /><br />A man walked out at 2:30 a.m. carrying an AR-15 after thirteen people were already dead across Wilkes-Barre, and he spent hours barricaded with mirrors facing outward - was he watching for police, or something else? This episode follows the staggering facts of September 25, 1982, and the single unnerving question that refuses a tidy answer.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events, the people who lived on Schoolhouse Lane, and the hours that followed the killings, closing on the unresolved motives behind the mirrors and the shootings that shocked a coal-region city. What can the details of one day reveal about the mind that planned it?<br /><br />Date: September 25, 1982<br />Person: George Emile Banks<br />Location: Schoolhouse Lane, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania<br />Victims: 13 dead (including six children killed by Banks)<br />Standoff duration: about four hours<br /><br />- Banks was 40 years old at the time of the shootings.<br />- Banks had killed six of his own children.<br />- Banks was arrested and handcuffed by 11:17 a.m. the same morning.<br />- Banks had been sent home on medical leave from the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill the summer before for psychiatric evaluation.<br />- Banks had placed mirrors around the building where he barricaded himself, facing outward.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1683</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Locked Door, Armed Cops, And the Man Who Wouldn't Stop Killing</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/locked-door-armed-cops-and-the-man-who-wouldn-t-stop-killing--72879080</link><description><![CDATA[Locked Door, Armed Cops, And the Man Who Wouldn't Stop Killing<br /><br />A locked door, two armed officers, and a bleeding man on the other side - that moment sits at the center of a twenty-eight hour spree that began in Sheepshead Bay and ended on a Manhattan subway. Four people were killed and three more attacked across two boroughs; why did the officers stay behind that door as the violence continued?<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the movements, victims, and decisions that shaped Maksim Gelman's rampage on February 11-12, 2011, and follow how an ordinary commuter’s small choice put him on the same car as a killer. What happened in the hours and tunnels between the murders and the subway that might explain the locked door?<br /><br />Person: Maksim Gelman<br />Date: February 11-12, 2011<br />Location: Sheepshead Bay and New York City subway<br />Victims killed: 4<br />Victims attacked: 3<br /><br />- Gelman stabbed his stepfather, Alexander Kuznetsov, with more than 50 stab wounds at about 5:00 AM on February 11, 2011.<br />- At 10:00 AM on February 11, 2011, Gelman arrived at Anna Bulchenko’s home, tortured her to obtain Yelena’s location, and left her dead.<br />- At 3:30 PM on February 11, 2011, Gelman stabbed Yelena Bulchenko outside her home and returned to stab her again in front of witnesses.<br />- At 4:30 PM on February 11, 2011, Gelman struck and killed coin dealer Steven Tannenbaum by driving into him and continuing on.<br />- Commuter Joe Lozito, age 39, boarded the subway at Penn Station on the morning of February 12, 2011, and ended up on the same car as Gelman while two officers remained behind a locked door.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879080</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879080/0601.mp3" length="24689531" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Locked Door, Armed Cops, And the Man Who Wouldn't Stop Killing&#13;
&#13;
A locked door, two armed officers, and a bleeding man on the other side - that moment sits at the center of a twenty-eight hour spree that began in Sheepshead Bay and ended on a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Locked Door, Armed Cops, And the Man Who Wouldn't Stop Killing<br /><br />A locked door, two armed officers, and a bleeding man on the other side - that moment sits at the center of a twenty-eight hour spree that began in Sheepshead Bay and ended on a Manhattan subway. Four people were killed and three more attacked across two boroughs; why did the officers stay behind that door as the violence continued?<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the movements, victims, and decisions that shaped Maksim Gelman's rampage on February 11-12, 2011, and follow how an ordinary commuter’s small choice put him on the same car as a killer. What happened in the hours and tunnels between the murders and the subway that might explain the locked door?<br /><br />Person: Maksim Gelman<br />Date: February 11-12, 2011<br />Location: Sheepshead Bay and New York City subway<br />Victims killed: 4<br />Victims attacked: 3<br /><br />- Gelman stabbed his stepfather, Alexander Kuznetsov, with more than 50 stab wounds at about 5:00 AM on February 11, 2011.<br />- At 10:00 AM on February 11, 2011, Gelman arrived at Anna Bulchenko’s home, tortured her to obtain Yelena’s location, and left her dead.<br />- At 3:30 PM on February 11, 2011, Gelman stabbed Yelena Bulchenko outside her home and returned to stab her again in front of witnesses.<br />- At 4:30 PM on February 11, 2011, Gelman struck and killed coin dealer Steven Tannenbaum by driving into him and continuing on.<br />- Commuter Joe Lozito, age 39, boarded the subway at Penn Station on the morning of February 12, 2011, and ended up on the same car as Gelman while two officers remained behind a locked door.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1544</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Stood in the Dark: The Barefoot Thief Who Learned to Fly</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-stood-in-the-dark-the-barefoot-thief-who-learned-to-fly--72879079</link><description><![CDATA[He Stood in the Dark: The Barefoot Thief Who Learned to Fly<br /><br />A ten-year-old boy was found standing in a dark elementary school closet, unafraid and methodical, leaving chalk outlines of his bare feet at crime scenes years later. That boy, Colton Harris-Moore, went on to steal nearly a dozen cars, five planes and elude police across nine states - so how did a teenager with no formal training teach himself to fly and stay untouchable for years?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the closet on Camano Island to the sandbank in the Bahamas, tracing Colton’s childhood, his escape from a group home, the escalating thefts, and the clues he left behind that suggest intention rather than panic. What did the flight manuals and his signatures at scenes reveal about who he became?<br /><br />Person: Colton Harris-Moore<br />Location: Camano Island, Washington<br />Period: born circa 1991; disappearance spanned two years after age 17<br />Event: stole five planes and nearly a dozen cars across nine states<br />Outcome: confronted by police on a sandbank in the Bahamas where he put a gun to his head<br /><br />- Found at age 10 standing inside a dark elementary school closet with cabinets pried open<br />- Left chalk outlines of both bare feet on the floor of a hardware store on Orcas Island<br />- Was sentenced to three years and placed in a group home in Renton at age 15<br />- Operated across nine states after leaving the group home at age 17, stealing close to a dozen vehicles<br />- Stole five planes and crossed state lines and an international border into Canada before capture<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879079</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:44 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879079/0600.mp3" length="23568564" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Stood in the Dark: The Barefoot Thief Who Learned to Fly&#13;
&#13;
A ten-year-old boy was found standing in a dark elementary school closet, unafraid and methodical, leaving chalk outlines of his bare feet at crime scenes years later. That boy, Colton...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Stood in the Dark: The Barefoot Thief Who Learned to Fly<br /><br />A ten-year-old boy was found standing in a dark elementary school closet, unafraid and methodical, leaving chalk outlines of his bare feet at crime scenes years later. That boy, Colton Harris-Moore, went on to steal nearly a dozen cars, five planes and elude police across nine states - so how did a teenager with no formal training teach himself to fly and stay untouchable for years?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the closet on Camano Island to the sandbank in the Bahamas, tracing Colton’s childhood, his escape from a group home, the escalating thefts, and the clues he left behind that suggest intention rather than panic. What did the flight manuals and his signatures at scenes reveal about who he became?<br /><br />Person: Colton Harris-Moore<br />Location: Camano Island, Washington<br />Period: born circa 1991; disappearance spanned two years after age 17<br />Event: stole five planes and nearly a dozen cars across nine states<br />Outcome: confronted by police on a sandbank in the Bahamas where he put a gun to his head<br /><br />- Found at age 10 standing inside a dark elementary school closet with cabinets pried open<br />- Left chalk outlines of both bare feet on the floor of a hardware store on Orcas Island<br />- Was sentenced to three years and placed in a group home in Renton at age 15<br />- Operated across nine states after leaving the group home at age 17, stealing close to a dozen vehicles<br />- Stole five planes and crossed state lines and an international border into Canada before capture<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1473</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Man Who Found Thirteen Bodies - Then Became the Suspect</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-man-who-found-thirteen-bodies-then-became-the-suspect--72879078</link><description><![CDATA[The Man Who Found Thirteen Bodies - Then Became the Suspect<br /><br />The discovery of thirteen dead men in the Central African Republic began with a twenty-four-year-old pilot walking six kilometers into the bush and following the smell of decomposition to three separate clusters of bodies - all killed by blunt force with wooden sticks. Within hours the man who reported the scene and called the soldiers became the only suspect; how did the act of helping turn into the act that condemned him?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events on March 22, 2011: the phone call from Eric Morave, the drive to the mining site, the moments David Simpson spent with local miners and Central African soldiers, and the small detail - plastic skulls left as a deterrent - that later mattered to investigators. Which choice or detail shifted David from witness to suspect?<br /><br />Person: David Simpson<br />Person: Eric Morave<br />Date: March 22, 2011<br />Location: mining site near Bakouma, Central African Republic<br />Cause of death: blunt force trauma to the head<br /><br />- David was 24 years old and had arrived in the Central African Republic at the end of 2010.<br />- David drove six kilometers into the bush after Eric reported five bodies.<br />- He found six bodies at first, then located four more, then three additional bodies, totaling thirteen.<br />- The bodies had wooden sticks laid across their backs or tied arms and were killed by blunt force trauma.<br />- Soldiers surveyed the site for approximately thirty minutes and left without recording identifications or moving the bodies.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879078</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879078/0599.mp3" length="27206063" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Man Who Found Thirteen Bodies - Then Became the Suspect&#13;
&#13;
The discovery of thirteen dead men in the Central African Republic began with a twenty-four-year-old pilot walking six kilometers into the bush and following the smell of decomposition to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Man Who Found Thirteen Bodies - Then Became the Suspect<br /><br />The discovery of thirteen dead men in the Central African Republic began with a twenty-four-year-old pilot walking six kilometers into the bush and following the smell of decomposition to three separate clusters of bodies - all killed by blunt force with wooden sticks. Within hours the man who reported the scene and called the soldiers became the only suspect; how did the act of helping turn into the act that condemned him?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events on March 22, 2011: the phone call from Eric Morave, the drive to the mining site, the moments David Simpson spent with local miners and Central African soldiers, and the small detail - plastic skulls left as a deterrent - that later mattered to investigators. Which choice or detail shifted David from witness to suspect?<br /><br />Person: David Simpson<br />Person: Eric Morave<br />Date: March 22, 2011<br />Location: mining site near Bakouma, Central African Republic<br />Cause of death: blunt force trauma to the head<br /><br />- David was 24 years old and had arrived in the Central African Republic at the end of 2010.<br />- David drove six kilometers into the bush after Eric reported five bodies.<br />- He found six bodies at first, then located four more, then three additional bodies, totaling thirteen.<br />- The bodies had wooden sticks laid across their backs or tied arms and were killed by blunt force trauma.<br />- Soldiers surveyed the site for approximately thirty minutes and left without recording identifications or moving the bodies.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1701</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>No Body, No Weapon, No Mercy: The Capano Cooler Mystery</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/no-body-no-weapon-no-mercy-the-capano-cooler-mystery--72879077</link><description><![CDATA[No Body, No Weapon, No Mercy: The Capano Cooler Mystery<br /><br />A prominent attorney, a missing 30-year-old scheduling secretary, a cooler bought two months earlier recovered with bullet holes and blood - and still no body. How did DNA on a baseboard, a linked credit-card receipt, and a floating cooler convince a jury to sentence Thomas Capano to death without a recovered victim or murder weapon?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from the June 27, 1996 dinner through the April purchase, the cooler recovery, and the 1999 verdict, following the physical evidence and the contradictions in Capano’s statements to ask: can a murder conviction stand when the body is missing?<br /><br />Person: Ann Marie Fahey<br />Person: Thomas Capano<br />Date: June 27, 1996 (last confirmed sighting)<br />Date: January 17, 1999 (jury sentenced Capano to death)<br />Location: cooler found about six miles from Indian River, New Jersey<br /><br />- Fahey was 30 years old when she disappeared; Capano was 47 at the time of the June 27, 1996 dinner.<br />- Capano purchased a large cooler on April 22, 1996 using his credit card; the cooler’s barcode traced to that purchase.<br />- Two days after Fahey was reported missing, Capano bought new carpeting; a receipt listed Airbase Carpets as the phone routing.<br />- Fisherman Ken Chubb found the cooler the weekend of July 4, 1996 with two bullet holes in the side and bloodstains inside.<br />- FBI analyst Alan Giusti matched DNA from Fahey’s donated plasma to hemoglobin stains on the baseboard behind Capano’s removed sofa, with the probability they did not share the same source described as essentially negligible.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879077</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:37 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879077/0598.mp3" length="26004012" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>No Body, No Weapon, No Mercy: The Capano Cooler Mystery&#13;
&#13;
A prominent attorney, a missing 30-year-old scheduling secretary, a cooler bought two months earlier recovered with bullet holes and blood - and still no body. How did DNA on a baseboard, a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[No Body, No Weapon, No Mercy: The Capano Cooler Mystery<br /><br />A prominent attorney, a missing 30-year-old scheduling secretary, a cooler bought two months earlier recovered with bullet holes and blood - and still no body. How did DNA on a baseboard, a linked credit-card receipt, and a floating cooler convince a jury to sentence Thomas Capano to death without a recovered victim or murder weapon?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from the June 27, 1996 dinner through the April purchase, the cooler recovery, and the 1999 verdict, following the physical evidence and the contradictions in Capano’s statements to ask: can a murder conviction stand when the body is missing?<br /><br />Person: Ann Marie Fahey<br />Person: Thomas Capano<br />Date: June 27, 1996 (last confirmed sighting)<br />Date: January 17, 1999 (jury sentenced Capano to death)<br />Location: cooler found about six miles from Indian River, New Jersey<br /><br />- Fahey was 30 years old when she disappeared; Capano was 47 at the time of the June 27, 1996 dinner.<br />- Capano purchased a large cooler on April 22, 1996 using his credit card; the cooler’s barcode traced to that purchase.<br />- Two days after Fahey was reported missing, Capano bought new carpeting; a receipt listed Airbase Carpets as the phone routing.<br />- Fisherman Ken Chubb found the cooler the weekend of July 4, 1996 with two bullet holes in the side and bloodstains inside.<br />- FBI analyst Alan Giusti matched DNA from Fahey’s donated plasma to hemoglobin stains on the baseboard behind Capano’s removed sofa, with the probability they did not share the same source described as essentially negligible.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1626</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Robbed 15 Banks - Then Vanished Into a Blood-Soaked Camper</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-robbed-15-banks-then-vanished-into-a-blood-soaked-camper--72879076</link><description><![CDATA[He Robbed 15 Banks - Then Vanished Into a Blood-Soaked Camper<br /><br />The more meticulous the crimes, the more chilling the silence left behind: fifteen bank robberies, over a million dollars taken, no fingerprints and almost no trace - then a camper full of blood and no body. What happened in the two-block radius between a shoot-out and a camper that dissolved the only coherent explanations?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Scott Scurlock and the sequence of events from the first whisper of a single name in a Seattle bank to the November 1996 SWAT entry at a blood-soaked camper. We follow the pattern of methodical midday robberies, the theatrical disguises, and the clues that kept pushing investigators toward a single, troubling question: how did a man who left so little behind disappear so completely?<br /><br />Person: Scott Scurlock<br />Alias: Hollywood<br />Period: 1992-1996<br />Event: SWAT entry into camper after a nearby shoot-out<br />Location: Seattle, Washington<br /><br />- Six weeks after June 25, 1992, a second robbery occurred on August 14, 1992, on the same street and branch as the first.<br />- By the sixth robbery in 1992, total stolen had climbed past $252,000.<br />- The tenth robbery occurred on July 13, 1994, when the robber used a stun gun instead of a Glock.<br />- Scurlock owned a twenty-acre ranch outside Olympia with a theatrical makeup studio beneath the granary floor.<br />- In November 1996, a SWAT team entered a camper two blocks from a shoot-out and found a great deal of blood but did not immediately find a body.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879076</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879076/0597.mp3" length="27899875" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Robbed 15 Banks - Then Vanished Into a Blood-Soaked Camper&#13;
&#13;
The more meticulous the crimes, the more chilling the silence left behind: fifteen bank robberies, over a million dollars taken, no fingerprints and almost no trace - then a camper full...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Robbed 15 Banks - Then Vanished Into a Blood-Soaked Camper<br /><br />The more meticulous the crimes, the more chilling the silence left behind: fifteen bank robberies, over a million dollars taken, no fingerprints and almost no trace - then a camper full of blood and no body. What happened in the two-block radius between a shoot-out and a camper that dissolved the only coherent explanations?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Scott Scurlock and the sequence of events from the first whisper of a single name in a Seattle bank to the November 1996 SWAT entry at a blood-soaked camper. We follow the pattern of methodical midday robberies, the theatrical disguises, and the clues that kept pushing investigators toward a single, troubling question: how did a man who left so little behind disappear so completely?<br /><br />Person: Scott Scurlock<br />Alias: Hollywood<br />Period: 1992-1996<br />Event: SWAT entry into camper after a nearby shoot-out<br />Location: Seattle, Washington<br /><br />- Six weeks after June 25, 1992, a second robbery occurred on August 14, 1992, on the same street and branch as the first.<br />- By the sixth robbery in 1992, total stolen had climbed past $252,000.<br />- The tenth robbery occurred on July 13, 1994, when the robber used a stun gun instead of a Glock.<br />- Scurlock owned a twenty-acre ranch outside Olympia with a theatrical makeup studio beneath the granary floor.<br />- In November 1996, a SWAT team entered a camper two blocks from a shoot-out and found a great deal of blood but did not immediately find a body.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1744</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Walked Out Free - Then Killed Three Federal Agents</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-walked-out-free-then-killed-three-federal-agents--72879075</link><description><![CDATA[He Walked Out Free - Then Killed Three Federal Agents<br /><br />A suspect was arrested within hours after three people were shot dead in a northwest D.C. house on October 26, 1994 - and then released despite a gold chain from the scene found in the car. Twenty-seven days later that same man walked into a federal building with a military-grade weapon and killed three law enforcement officers; how did one interrogation and a series of open doors allow this to happen?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the 1st & Kennedy Street Crew, the October 26, 1994 triple homicide, the hurried investigation that followed, and the decisions in one interrogation room that failed to stop a later massacre. How did evidence, timing, and choices converge to keep deadly paths open?<br /><br />Person: Benny Lee Lawson Jr.<br />Person: Kobe Mowatt<br />Person: Jermaine Graves<br />Date: October 26, 1994<br />Location: northwest Washington D.C.<br /><br />- Three people were shot dead inside William Ragland’s house the night of October 26, 1994.<br />- A dark sedan with a loud, broken muffler was stopped within hours with three men inside from the 1st & Kennedy Street Crew.<br />- Andre Madison’s gold chain from the house was found in plain view inside the stopped car.<br />- Benny Lee Lawson was held for three to four hours for questioning the morning after the killings and was released.<br />- Twenty-seven days after his release, the same man entered a federal building with a military-grade weapon and killed three law enforcement officers.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879075</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:30 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879075/0596.mp3" length="29152499" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Walked Out Free - Then Killed Three Federal Agents&#13;
&#13;
A suspect was arrested within hours after three people were shot dead in a northwest D.C. house on October 26, 1994 - and then released despite a gold chain from the scene found in the car....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Walked Out Free - Then Killed Three Federal Agents<br /><br />A suspect was arrested within hours after three people were shot dead in a northwest D.C. house on October 26, 1994 - and then released despite a gold chain from the scene found in the car. Twenty-seven days later that same man walked into a federal building with a military-grade weapon and killed three law enforcement officers; how did one interrogation and a series of open doors allow this to happen?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of the 1st & Kennedy Street Crew, the October 26, 1994 triple homicide, the hurried investigation that followed, and the decisions in one interrogation room that failed to stop a later massacre. How did evidence, timing, and choices converge to keep deadly paths open?<br /><br />Person: Benny Lee Lawson Jr.<br />Person: Kobe Mowatt<br />Person: Jermaine Graves<br />Date: October 26, 1994<br />Location: northwest Washington D.C.<br /><br />- Three people were shot dead inside William Ragland’s house the night of October 26, 1994.<br />- A dark sedan with a loud, broken muffler was stopped within hours with three men inside from the 1st & Kennedy Street Crew.<br />- Andre Madison’s gold chain from the house was found in plain view inside the stopped car.<br />- Benny Lee Lawson was held for three to four hours for questioning the morning after the killings and was released.<br />- Twenty-seven days after his release, the same man entered a federal building with a military-grade weapon and killed three law enforcement officers.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1822</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Two Blocks, Thirty Minutes: How a Birthday Card Vanished Vicky</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/two-blocks-thirty-minutes-how-a-birthday-card-vanished-vicky--72879073</link><description><![CDATA[Two Blocks, Thirty Minutes: How a Birthday Card Vanished Vicky<br /><br />A child left to mail a birthday card and disappeared inside thirty minutes - her pink bicycle found abandoned, a postal worker confirming the card had been posted, and a slow black car with California plates seen heading the same way she rode. What happened on that two-block stretch between Cottonwood mailbox and home that turned a Monday into a family's worst nightmare?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from September 17, 1984 through the early days of the search, following witness reports, neighborhood canvassing, and the discovery that transformed the case. How did a man found with blood on his hands two hours later become central to what investigators would conclude?<br /><br />Date: September 17, 1984<br />Person: Vicky Lynn Hoskinson, age eight<br />Location: Flowing Wells area, northwest Tucson<br />Event: Missing after mailing a birthday card<br />Person: Frank Jarvis Atwood Jr., age twenty-eight<br /><br />- The mailbox at the corner of Cottonwood was two blocks from Vicky's home.<br />- Vicky was ordered to be back by 3:30 p.m. and said "Hey Mom, I love you" before leaving.<br />- Witnesses placed Vicky at the convenience store near the mailbox around 3:00 p.m.<br />- Two older boys saw a small, slow black car with California plates moving in the direction Vicky was riding.<br />- A man later identified as Frank Jarvis Atwood Jr. admitted leaving a nearby park at roughly 3:00 p.m., returning around 5:00 p.m. with blood on his hands, blood on his clothes, and a knife.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879073</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:26 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879073/0595.mp3" length="25738190" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Two Blocks, Thirty Minutes: How a Birthday Card Vanished Vicky&#13;
&#13;
A child left to mail a birthday card and disappeared inside thirty minutes - her pink bicycle found abandoned, a postal worker confirming the card had been posted, and a slow black car...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Two Blocks, Thirty Minutes: How a Birthday Card Vanished Vicky<br /><br />A child left to mail a birthday card and disappeared inside thirty minutes - her pink bicycle found abandoned, a postal worker confirming the card had been posted, and a slow black car with California plates seen heading the same way she rode. What happened on that two-block stretch between Cottonwood mailbox and home that turned a Monday into a family's worst nightmare?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from September 17, 1984 through the early days of the search, following witness reports, neighborhood canvassing, and the discovery that transformed the case. How did a man found with blood on his hands two hours later become central to what investigators would conclude?<br /><br />Date: September 17, 1984<br />Person: Vicky Lynn Hoskinson, age eight<br />Location: Flowing Wells area, northwest Tucson<br />Event: Missing after mailing a birthday card<br />Person: Frank Jarvis Atwood Jr., age twenty-eight<br /><br />- The mailbox at the corner of Cottonwood was two blocks from Vicky's home.<br />- Vicky was ordered to be back by 3:30 p.m. and said "Hey Mom, I love you" before leaving.<br />- Witnesses placed Vicky at the convenience store near the mailbox around 3:00 p.m.<br />- Two older boys saw a small, slow black car with California plates moving in the direction Vicky was riding.<br />- A man later identified as Frank Jarvis Atwood Jr. admitted leaving a nearby park at roughly 3:00 p.m., returning around 5:00 p.m. with blood on his hands, blood on his clothes, and a knife.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1609</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Locked Inside Quantico: The Captain Who Vanished Without a Trace</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/locked-inside-quantico-the-captain-who-vanished-without-a-trace--72879072</link><description><![CDATA[Locked Inside Quantico: The Captain Who Vanished Without a Trace<br /><br />The base that trains Marine officers and the FBI became a locked-room puzzle: Captain Shirley Gibbs Russell walked into a storage shed on March 4, 1989, and never came out, yet no body, weapon, or eyewitnesses have ever been found. How could a woman who never missed a duty, who lived on a closed federal installation, disappear without a trace - and why did the case hinge on a floppy disk and a sentence written years earlier?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of Shirley Russell's disappearance, the tensions around her marriage to Robert Peter Russell, and the details investigators logged on Quantico that day to ask the central unanswered question: what happened in storage unit 394D on March 4, 1989?<br /><br />Person: Shirley Gibbs Russell<br />Person: Robert Peter Russell<br />Location: Marine Corps Base Quantico<br />Date: March 4, 1989<br />Case: Disappearance with no body<br /><br />- Shirley Russell was adjutant to the commanding officer of the support battalion at the Marine Basic School and had never been late to work.<br />- On March 4, 1989, she was last said to have entered storage unit 394D at Quantico to paint quarters and never returned.<br />- Robert Russell purchased a .25 caliber Raven semi-automatic pistol two days before her disappearance and told a coworker the .25 produced "little blood spatter."<br />- The duty clerk logged a 3:30 p.m. call from Robert to Shirley's bachelor quarters on the day she vanished; by 4:00 p.m. Robert had left the base.<br />- Robert was discharged in February 1988 with a less than honorable discharge for dereliction of duty and defrauding the government and was living in base housing only under Shirley's rank.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879072</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879072/0594.mp3" length="26738366" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Locked Inside Quantico: The Captain Who Vanished Without a Trace&#13;
&#13;
The base that trains Marine officers and the FBI became a locked-room puzzle: Captain Shirley Gibbs Russell walked into a storage shed on March 4, 1989, and never came out, yet no...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Locked Inside Quantico: The Captain Who Vanished Without a Trace<br /><br />The base that trains Marine officers and the FBI became a locked-room puzzle: Captain Shirley Gibbs Russell walked into a storage shed on March 4, 1989, and never came out, yet no body, weapon, or eyewitnesses have ever been found. How could a woman who never missed a duty, who lived on a closed federal installation, disappear without a trace - and why did the case hinge on a floppy disk and a sentence written years earlier?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline of Shirley Russell's disappearance, the tensions around her marriage to Robert Peter Russell, and the details investigators logged on Quantico that day to ask the central unanswered question: what happened in storage unit 394D on March 4, 1989?<br /><br />Person: Shirley Gibbs Russell<br />Person: Robert Peter Russell<br />Location: Marine Corps Base Quantico<br />Date: March 4, 1989<br />Case: Disappearance with no body<br /><br />- Shirley Russell was adjutant to the commanding officer of the support battalion at the Marine Basic School and had never been late to work.<br />- On March 4, 1989, she was last said to have entered storage unit 394D at Quantico to paint quarters and never returned.<br />- Robert Russell purchased a .25 caliber Raven semi-automatic pistol two days before her disappearance and told a coworker the .25 produced "little blood spatter."<br />- The duty clerk logged a 3:30 p.m. call from Robert to Shirley's bachelor quarters on the day she vanished; by 4:00 p.m. Robert had left the base.<br />- Robert was discharged in February 1988 with a less than honorable discharge for dereliction of duty and defrauding the government and was living in base housing only under Shirley's rank.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1672</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/669419f83283e671b69d1987bc9b1786.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Said "I'm Dying" - Left on Hold, Two Sisters Missing Justice</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-said-i-m-dying-left-on-hold-two-sisters-missing-justice--72879071</link><description><![CDATA[She Said "I'm Dying" - Left on Hold, Two Sisters Missing Justice<br /><br />A seventeen-year-old screamed into a phone: "I've been shot. I'm dying." The dispatcher put her on hold, the call was transferred to the fire department, and nearly an hour later their bodies were found - so how did a protocol meant to save a life fail in real time? What happened in the final minutes no one has explained?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the lives of two sisters who tried to escape a controlled household, the missing evidence they left behind, and the unanswered questions about a father who drove a taxi and the night that changed everything. Listen to learn how a lost letter and a disputed history of abuse connect to the girls getting into their father's cab on New Year's Day.<br /><br />Person: Sarah Said<br />Person: Amina Said<br />Person: Yaser Abdel Said<br />Person: Patricia Said (Tizzy/Casey)<br />Location: Irving, Texas<br /><br />- Sarah Said was 17 years old when she called on January 1, 2008 saying "I've been shot. I'm dying."<br />- Amina Said was 18 years old and had written a letter to her aunt Connie saying she had been forced to lie; that letter is now missing.<br />- Their father, Yaser Abdel Said, worked as a Yellow Cab taxi driver and drove the girls in his taxi on New Year's Day.<br />- Medical examinations after allegations the year before found no physical evidence, and the official investigation was closed.<br />- The dispatcher transferred Sarah's call to the fire department and placed the line on hold before the line went dead; the bodies were found nearly an hour later.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879071</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879071/0593.mp3" length="26348828" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Said "I'm Dying" - Left on Hold, Two Sisters Missing Justice&#13;
&#13;
A seventeen-year-old screamed into a phone: "I've been shot. I'm dying." The dispatcher put her on hold, the call was transferred to the fire department, and nearly an hour later...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Said "I'm Dying" - Left on Hold, Two Sisters Missing Justice<br /><br />A seventeen-year-old screamed into a phone: "I've been shot. I'm dying." The dispatcher put her on hold, the call was transferred to the fire department, and nearly an hour later their bodies were found - so how did a protocol meant to save a life fail in real time? What happened in the final minutes no one has explained?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the lives of two sisters who tried to escape a controlled household, the missing evidence they left behind, and the unanswered questions about a father who drove a taxi and the night that changed everything. Listen to learn how a lost letter and a disputed history of abuse connect to the girls getting into their father's cab on New Year's Day.<br /><br />Person: Sarah Said<br />Person: Amina Said<br />Person: Yaser Abdel Said<br />Person: Patricia Said (Tizzy/Casey)<br />Location: Irving, Texas<br /><br />- Sarah Said was 17 years old when she called on January 1, 2008 saying "I've been shot. I'm dying."<br />- Amina Said was 18 years old and had written a letter to her aunt Connie saying she had been forced to lie; that letter is now missing.<br />- Their father, Yaser Abdel Said, worked as a Yellow Cab taxi driver and drove the girls in his taxi on New Year's Day.<br />- Medical examinations after allegations the year before found no physical evidence, and the official investigation was closed.<br />- The dispatcher transferred Sarah's call to the fire department and placed the line on hold before the line went dead; the bodies were found nearly an hour later.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1647</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Man Who Vanished for a Lie: The Frank Black Disappearance</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-man-who-vanished-for-a-lie-the-frank-black-disappearance--72879069</link><description><![CDATA[The Man Who Vanished for a Lie: The Frank Black Disappearance<br /><br />A profitable businessman boarded a one-way flight in 1996 and disappeared after trusting a woman who did not exist; his credit cards were swiped at an Embassy Suites pay phone and a North Miami gas station at 1-4 a.m., yet no one saw him. Who was the phantom Mia Giordano, and how did phone records, a rival with a motive, and a landfill full of potential evidence all point to a disappearance with no confirmed body?<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the timeline from Newark Airport to West Palm Beach and North Miami, follow the calls from a number that would not accept callbacks, and lay out the connections between Frank Black, the phantom contact Mia Giordano, Lisa Costello, and rival Allan McCauley. What do the card swipes, rental car records, and landfill recoveries really add up to?<br /><br />Person: Frank Black<br />Date: February 24-25, 1996<br />Location: Newark Airport; West Palm Beach; North Miami; Martin County Landfill<br />Person: Allan McCauley<br /><br />- Frank Black was 58 years old when he flew one-way on Kiwi Airlines Flight 45 to West Palm Beach on February 24, 1996.<br />- A pay phone at an Embassy Suites registered a swipe of Frank Black's credit card between 1:00 and 2:00 a.m. on February 25, 1996.<br />- A second of Frank Black's credit cards was swiped at a North Miami gas station at 4:00 a.m. on February 25, 1996.<br />- Investigators confirmed that the name Mia Giordano and Valdez Exporting had no records in Florida or New Jersey and did not exist.<br />- Investigators recovered building materials from the Martin County Landfill after McCauley removed carpet, sheetrock, and used an industrial vacuum from his foyer following Black's disappearance.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879069</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879069/0592.mp3" length="25799630" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Man Who Vanished for a Lie: The Frank Black Disappearance&#13;
&#13;
A profitable businessman boarded a one-way flight in 1996 and disappeared after trusting a woman who did not exist; his credit cards were swiped at an Embassy Suites pay phone and a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Man Who Vanished for a Lie: The Frank Black Disappearance<br /><br />A profitable businessman boarded a one-way flight in 1996 and disappeared after trusting a woman who did not exist; his credit cards were swiped at an Embassy Suites pay phone and a North Miami gas station at 1-4 a.m., yet no one saw him. Who was the phantom Mia Giordano, and how did phone records, a rival with a motive, and a landfill full of potential evidence all point to a disappearance with no confirmed body?<br /><br />In this episode, we trace the timeline from Newark Airport to West Palm Beach and North Miami, follow the calls from a number that would not accept callbacks, and lay out the connections between Frank Black, the phantom contact Mia Giordano, Lisa Costello, and rival Allan McCauley. What do the card swipes, rental car records, and landfill recoveries really add up to?<br /><br />Person: Frank Black<br />Date: February 24-25, 1996<br />Location: Newark Airport; West Palm Beach; North Miami; Martin County Landfill<br />Person: Allan McCauley<br /><br />- Frank Black was 58 years old when he flew one-way on Kiwi Airlines Flight 45 to West Palm Beach on February 24, 1996.<br />- A pay phone at an Embassy Suites registered a swipe of Frank Black's credit card between 1:00 and 2:00 a.m. on February 25, 1996.<br />- A second of Frank Black's credit cards was swiped at a North Miami gas station at 4:00 a.m. on February 25, 1996.<br />- Investigators confirmed that the name Mia Giordano and Valdez Exporting had no records in Florida or New Jersey and did not exist.<br />- Investigators recovered building materials from the Martin County Landfill after McCauley removed carpet, sheetrock, and used an industrial vacuum from his foyer following Black's disappearance.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1613</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>They Read Sodom and Killed: The Bible Note That Ended Two Lives</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/they-read-sodom-and-killed-the-bible-note-that-ended-two-lives--72879068</link><description><![CDATA[They Read Sodom and Killed: The Bible Note That Ended Two Lives<br /><br />The morning of Sunday, July 1, 2001, ended with two men killed and a Bible passage about Sodom left as explanation-how did a note and underlined scripture become the turning point between life and murder? Hear how a cane knife, a trusted visitor, and a century-old missionary legacy circle into a single, unresolved act of violence.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened that morning and trace the history that shaped it, from the missionary William Lindsay's arrival in 1871 to the cultural shifts in Fiji's Methodist Church and the lives of the victims, asking whether the murders can be understood without looking back 130 years.<br /><br />Person: John Scott<br />Person: Greg Scrivener<br />Person: Petite Kaiserau<br />Date: July 1, 2001<br />Event: Two men killed with a cane knife; note referencing Sodom and Gomorrah left at scene<br /><br />- The murders occurred on Sunday, July 1, 2001, in a suburb of Suva, Fiji.<br />- Both victims, John Scott and his partner Greg Scrivener, were killed with a cane knife.<br />- The suspect, Petite Kaiserau, led police to the scene and his account matched evidence exactly.<br />- Kaiserau was found not guilty by reason of insanity and sent to a psychiatric facility.<br />- John Scott was the fourth-generation descendant of missionary William Lindsay, who arrived in Fiji in 1871.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879068</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879068/0591.mp3" length="26808584" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>They Read Sodom and Killed: The Bible Note That Ended Two Lives&#13;
&#13;
The morning of Sunday, July 1, 2001, ended with two men killed and a Bible passage about Sodom left as explanation-how did a note and underlined scripture become the turning point...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[They Read Sodom and Killed: The Bible Note That Ended Two Lives<br /><br />The morning of Sunday, July 1, 2001, ended with two men killed and a Bible passage about Sodom left as explanation-how did a note and underlined scripture become the turning point between life and murder? Hear how a cane knife, a trusted visitor, and a century-old missionary legacy circle into a single, unresolved act of violence.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell what happened that morning and trace the history that shaped it, from the missionary William Lindsay's arrival in 1871 to the cultural shifts in Fiji's Methodist Church and the lives of the victims, asking whether the murders can be understood without looking back 130 years.<br /><br />Person: John Scott<br />Person: Greg Scrivener<br />Person: Petite Kaiserau<br />Date: July 1, 2001<br />Event: Two men killed with a cane knife; note referencing Sodom and Gomorrah left at scene<br /><br />- The murders occurred on Sunday, July 1, 2001, in a suburb of Suva, Fiji.<br />- Both victims, John Scott and his partner Greg Scrivener, were killed with a cane knife.<br />- The suspect, Petite Kaiserau, led police to the scene and his account matched evidence exactly.<br />- Kaiserau was found not guilty by reason of insanity and sent to a psychiatric facility.<br />- John Scott was the fourth-generation descendant of missionary William Lindsay, who arrived in Fiji in 1871.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1676</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Ritual, The Head, The Keys: Inside Yahweh Ben Yahweh's Killings</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ritual-the-head-the-keys-inside-yahweh-ben-yahweh-s-killings--72879067</link><description><![CDATA[The Ritual, The Head, The Keys: Inside Yahweh Ben Yahweh's Killings<br /><br />The scene that stopped a Miami detective was brutal and precise: a young man’s body on a dirt road and his head wrapped in bedsheets, placed exactly four feet away. That deliberate spacing, a blunt-edged machete cut, and a single set of keys on the victim pointed to something more structured than random violence - so what kind of system could produce that level of method and message?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the discovery and early investigation into the deaths connected to a new Miami-based religious movement led by a man calling himself Yahweh Ben Yahweh, and we trace how a single crime scene - and a warning left for investigators - changed the direction of the police work. How did routine contact with police become a death sentence, and why were victims staged with the same unsettling precision?<br /><br />Person: Aston Greene<br />Date: November 13, 1981<br />Location: dirt road on the edge of Miami-Dade<br />Investigator: Detective John King<br />Weapon: blunt-edged large blade, possibly a machete<br /><br />- The victim, Aston Greene, was 25 years old when his body and head were found four feet apart.<br />- Greene had stopped eating meat and was given a vegetarian meal by his mother in the last weeks of his life.<br />- Fingerprint identification in 1981 required manual comparison under a magnifier and confirmed Greene’s identity.<br />- The autopsy recorded broken nose, loosened teeth, swelling around both eyes, ligature marks on both wrists, and shoe sole impressions on his torso.<br />- The morning after Greene’s identification, Carlton Carey was shot multiple times at his home and his wife, Mildred Banks, was shot in the chest and cut across the left side of her neck; a bloodied machete was found near the doorway.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879067</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879067/0590.mp3" length="23749540" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Ritual, The Head, The Keys: Inside Yahweh Ben Yahweh's Killings&#13;
&#13;
The scene that stopped a Miami detective was brutal and precise: a young man’s body on a dirt road and his head wrapped in bedsheets, placed exactly four feet away. That deliberate...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Ritual, The Head, The Keys: Inside Yahweh Ben Yahweh's Killings<br /><br />The scene that stopped a Miami detective was brutal and precise: a young man’s body on a dirt road and his head wrapped in bedsheets, placed exactly four feet away. That deliberate spacing, a blunt-edged machete cut, and a single set of keys on the victim pointed to something more structured than random violence - so what kind of system could produce that level of method and message?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the discovery and early investigation into the deaths connected to a new Miami-based religious movement led by a man calling himself Yahweh Ben Yahweh, and we trace how a single crime scene - and a warning left for investigators - changed the direction of the police work. How did routine contact with police become a death sentence, and why were victims staged with the same unsettling precision?<br /><br />Person: Aston Greene<br />Date: November 13, 1981<br />Location: dirt road on the edge of Miami-Dade<br />Investigator: Detective John King<br />Weapon: blunt-edged large blade, possibly a machete<br /><br />- The victim, Aston Greene, was 25 years old when his body and head were found four feet apart.<br />- Greene had stopped eating meat and was given a vegetarian meal by his mother in the last weeks of his life.<br />- Fingerprint identification in 1981 required manual comparison under a magnifier and confirmed Greene’s identity.<br />- The autopsy recorded broken nose, loosened teeth, swelling around both eyes, ligature marks on both wrists, and shoe sole impressions on his torso.<br />- The morning after Greene’s identification, Carlton Carey was shot multiple times at his home and his wife, Mildred Banks, was shot in the chest and cut across the left side of her neck; a bloodied machete was found near the doorway.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1485</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Wrote a Hit List - The Gas Station Murders Uncovered</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-wrote-a-hit-list-the-gas-station-murders-uncovered--72879066</link><description><![CDATA[He Wrote a Hit List - The Gas Station Murders Uncovered<br /><br />The list inside his car named nine people, two of whom were found alive but barely - and one vanished gas-station worker never returned home after the night of July 9, 1995. How did a man who arrived in New York with a few dollars build a 50-60 station empire, allegedly steal $40 million, and keep dissenters disappearing?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a Bronx late-shift disappearance to a decade-long operation of pump tampering and intimidation, ending with a man who came from India to look for his brother and was killed on March 16, 1997. What connected the cash gaps at the pumps, the removed witnesses, and the hit list found in a car?<br /><br />Person: Dinza Singh<br />Event: disappearance of gas-station worker on July 9, 1995<br />Period: mid-1980s to late 1990s<br />Estimate: $40,000,000 fraud over roughly ten years<br />Date: March 16, 1997 (death of Mahan Singh)<br /><br />- Dinza Singh owned or controlled between 50 and 60 gas stations across New York and New Jersey by the late 1990s.<br />- Federal prosecutors later estimated the pump-underdelivery fraud at $40,000,000 across about ten years.<br />- A Bronx gas-station worker disappeared on the night of July 9, 1995 with no struggle and no body recovered then.<br />- Three months later, in October 1995, Mahan Singh arrived from India and took a night job at a gas station to look for his missing brother.<br />- Mahan Singh was found dead in Brooklyn on the night of March 16, 1997 after about a year and a half of asking questions.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879066</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879066/0589.mp3" length="26503891" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Wrote a Hit List - The Gas Station Murders Uncovered&#13;
&#13;
The list inside his car named nine people, two of whom were found alive but barely - and one vanished gas-station worker never returned home after the night of July 9, 1995. How did a man who...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Wrote a Hit List - The Gas Station Murders Uncovered<br /><br />The list inside his car named nine people, two of whom were found alive but barely - and one vanished gas-station worker never returned home after the night of July 9, 1995. How did a man who arrived in New York with a few dollars build a 50-60 station empire, allegedly steal $40 million, and keep dissenters disappearing?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a Bronx late-shift disappearance to a decade-long operation of pump tampering and intimidation, ending with a man who came from India to look for his brother and was killed on March 16, 1997. What connected the cash gaps at the pumps, the removed witnesses, and the hit list found in a car?<br /><br />Person: Dinza Singh<br />Event: disappearance of gas-station worker on July 9, 1995<br />Period: mid-1980s to late 1990s<br />Estimate: $40,000,000 fraud over roughly ten years<br />Date: March 16, 1997 (death of Mahan Singh)<br /><br />- Dinza Singh owned or controlled between 50 and 60 gas stations across New York and New Jersey by the late 1990s.<br />- Federal prosecutors later estimated the pump-underdelivery fraud at $40,000,000 across about ten years.<br />- A Bronx gas-station worker disappeared on the night of July 9, 1995 with no struggle and no body recovered then.<br />- Three months later, in October 1995, Mahan Singh arrived from India and took a night job at a gas station to look for his missing brother.<br />- Mahan Singh was found dead in Brooklyn on the night of March 16, 1997 after about a year and a half of asking questions.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1657</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Red Coat, The Secret Will, and the Missing Woman</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-red-coat-the-secret-will-and-the-missing-woman--72879065</link><description><![CDATA[The Red Coat, The Secret Will, and the Missing Woman<br /><br />A quiet Hampstead cottage, a man cremated before questions could be answered, and a fragile handwritten will that routed roughly four hundred thousand pounds away from the only nephew who had been his regular Sunday call - who did this benefit, and how was the document signed if the name never appears in the text? The single most unsettling detail is simple and concrete: Walter Jocelyn’s name appears only in the signature line.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events as recorded in the file: who Walter was, how Sybil entered his life wearing a red coat, the Monday signing at an art shop and the letter that arrived a week after the funeral explaining a second will. What really happened in that small room on July 15, 1991, and what vanished with Walter when he was cremated?<br /><br />Person: Walter Jocelyn<br />Date: July 15, 1991<br />Location: Hampstead High Street art shop; Hampstead residence<br />Estate value: roughly four hundred thousand pounds<br />Witnesses: Emma Williams and Andrew Scott Stokes<br /><br />- Walter Jocelyn signed a handwritten document at an art shop on Monday, July 15, 1991.<br />- Walter’s name does not appear anywhere in the body of the will; it appears only in the signature line.<br />- The will named Sybil Dreda Owen as executor and left the entire estate to Sybil’s daughter, Barbara Hatch.<br />- Walter had an earlier formal will with his solicitor, Mr. Pinks, dividing the estate between his nephew Peter Ainley and St. Mary’s Church.<br />- The handwritten will was produced to the family one week after Walter’s funeral; Walter had been cremated before the second document was known outside a small circle.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879065</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879065/0588.mp3" length="26452900" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Red Coat, The Secret Will, and the Missing Woman&#13;
&#13;
A quiet Hampstead cottage, a man cremated before questions could be answered, and a fragile handwritten will that routed roughly four hundred thousand pounds away from the only nephew who had...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Red Coat, The Secret Will, and the Missing Woman<br /><br />A quiet Hampstead cottage, a man cremated before questions could be answered, and a fragile handwritten will that routed roughly four hundred thousand pounds away from the only nephew who had been his regular Sunday call - who did this benefit, and how was the document signed if the name never appears in the text? The single most unsettling detail is simple and concrete: Walter Jocelyn’s name appears only in the signature line.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events as recorded in the file: who Walter was, how Sybil entered his life wearing a red coat, the Monday signing at an art shop and the letter that arrived a week after the funeral explaining a second will. What really happened in that small room on July 15, 1991, and what vanished with Walter when he was cremated?<br /><br />Person: Walter Jocelyn<br />Date: July 15, 1991<br />Location: Hampstead High Street art shop; Hampstead residence<br />Estate value: roughly four hundred thousand pounds<br />Witnesses: Emma Williams and Andrew Scott Stokes<br /><br />- Walter Jocelyn signed a handwritten document at an art shop on Monday, July 15, 1991.<br />- Walter’s name does not appear anywhere in the body of the will; it appears only in the signature line.<br />- The will named Sybil Dreda Owen as executor and left the entire estate to Sybil’s daughter, Barbara Hatch.<br />- Walter had an earlier formal will with his solicitor, Mr. Pinks, dividing the estate between his nephew Peter Ainley and St. Mary’s Church.<br />- The handwritten will was produced to the family one week after Walter’s funeral; Walter had been cremated before the second document was known outside a small circle.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1654</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>When One Bullet Broke a Family: Dean's Unforgiven Street Truth</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/when-one-bullet-broke-a-family-dean-s-unforgiven-street-truth--72879064</link><description><![CDATA[When One Bullet Broke a Family: Dean's Unforgiven Street Truth<br /><br />A single bullet through a patrol car window changed at least three lives: a twenty-year-old shooter, a police officer left with a shoulder wound, and a wife who died two years later without her name ever appearing in sentencing documents. What exactly did that June afternoon set in motion, and why does one missing name keep the door open on everything that followed?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the street in East London on 27 June 2006 through the prison years and the music that came out of a cell, asking whether punishment, loss, and art can ever reconcile the harm done. What responsibility follows a moment that ripples beyond the people present?<br /><br />Person: Dean<br />Date: 27 June 2006<br />Location: East London<br />Event: Six shots fired; officer hit in left shoulder<br />Sentence: Imprisonment for Public Protection, minimum six years, served eight<br /><br />- Six shots were fired on the street at approximately 3:30 pm on 27 June 2006.<br />- The second shot shattered a patrol car window and struck the responding officer in the left shoulder.<br />- Dean was twenty years old at the time of the shooting and later became a father of three.<br />- Dean received an IPP sentence with a minimum term of six years, which ultimately extended to eight years served.<br />- While imprisoned, Dean recorded an album on a mini-disc in another inmate’s cell using a microphone, a stereo, and a PlayStation looping beats.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879064</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:56 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879064/0587.mp3" length="23968551" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>When One Bullet Broke a Family: Dean's Unforgiven Street Truth&#13;
&#13;
A single bullet through a patrol car window changed at least three lives: a twenty-year-old shooter, a police officer left with a shoulder wound, and a wife who died two years later...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[When One Bullet Broke a Family: Dean's Unforgiven Street Truth<br /><br />A single bullet through a patrol car window changed at least three lives: a twenty-year-old shooter, a police officer left with a shoulder wound, and a wife who died two years later without her name ever appearing in sentencing documents. What exactly did that June afternoon set in motion, and why does one missing name keep the door open on everything that followed?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the street in East London on 27 June 2006 through the prison years and the music that came out of a cell, asking whether punishment, loss, and art can ever reconcile the harm done. What responsibility follows a moment that ripples beyond the people present?<br /><br />Person: Dean<br />Date: 27 June 2006<br />Location: East London<br />Event: Six shots fired; officer hit in left shoulder<br />Sentence: Imprisonment for Public Protection, minimum six years, served eight<br /><br />- Six shots were fired on the street at approximately 3:30 pm on 27 June 2006.<br />- The second shot shattered a patrol car window and struck the responding officer in the left shoulder.<br />- Dean was twenty years old at the time of the shooting and later became a father of three.<br />- Dean received an IPP sentence with a minimum term of six years, which ultimately extended to eight years served.<br />- While imprisoned, Dean recorded an album on a mini-disc in another inmate’s cell using a microphone, a stereo, and a PlayStation looping beats.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1498</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Filmed His Alibi - The Father Who Bought His Son's Death</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-filmed-his-alibi-the-father-who-bought-his-son-s-death--72879063</link><description><![CDATA[He Filmed His Alibi - The Father Who Bought His Son's Death<br /><br />The sound of a respirator stopped and an eight-year-old who could not move was left to die; then his mother and a nurse were shot. A man in Los Angeles filmed himself in front of a TV showing 11:45 p.m. Pacific - a twenty-two-second tape investigators say became his alibi - so how did the scene in Silver Spring hide what really happened?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the garage discovered open on March 3, 1993 to the evidence found in a Los Angeles apartment eight days later, tracing the tape, the paperwork, and the map that tied a father to a fatal payout. What did the recording prove, and what did the staged crime scene try to conceal?<br /><br />Person: Trevor Horn<br />Person: Mildred Horn<br />Date: March 3, 1993<br />Location: Silver Spring, Maryland<br />Event: Respirator disconnected and shootings<br /><br />- Trevor Horn was eight years old and quadriplegic, dependent on a respirator that ran continuously.<br />- Janice Saunders, the nurse, signed in at 2:00 a.m. and did not sign in at 3:00 a.m. the night of the crime.<br />- A settlement of $1.7 million would pass to Lawrence Horn if both Mildred and Trevor died.<br />- Investigators found a hand-drawn map of Mildred's neighborhood and her address in Lawrence Horn’s Los Angeles apartment.<br />- Lawrence Horn filmed himself with a TV program guide showing 11:45 p.m. Pacific - 2:45 a.m. in Maryland - creating a recorded alibi.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879063</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879063/0586.mp3" length="25362863" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Filmed His Alibi - The Father Who Bought His Son's Death&#13;
&#13;
The sound of a respirator stopped and an eight-year-old who could not move was left to die; then his mother and a nurse were shot. A man in Los Angeles filmed himself in front of a TV...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Filmed His Alibi - The Father Who Bought His Son's Death<br /><br />The sound of a respirator stopped and an eight-year-old who could not move was left to die; then his mother and a nurse were shot. A man in Los Angeles filmed himself in front of a TV showing 11:45 p.m. Pacific - a twenty-two-second tape investigators say became his alibi - so how did the scene in Silver Spring hide what really happened?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the garage discovered open on March 3, 1993 to the evidence found in a Los Angeles apartment eight days later, tracing the tape, the paperwork, and the map that tied a father to a fatal payout. What did the recording prove, and what did the staged crime scene try to conceal?<br /><br />Person: Trevor Horn<br />Person: Mildred Horn<br />Date: March 3, 1993<br />Location: Silver Spring, Maryland<br />Event: Respirator disconnected and shootings<br /><br />- Trevor Horn was eight years old and quadriplegic, dependent on a respirator that ran continuously.<br />- Janice Saunders, the nurse, signed in at 2:00 a.m. and did not sign in at 3:00 a.m. the night of the crime.<br />- A settlement of $1.7 million would pass to Lawrence Horn if both Mildred and Trevor died.<br />- Investigators found a hand-drawn map of Mildred's neighborhood and her address in Lawrence Horn’s Los Angeles apartment.<br />- Lawrence Horn filmed himself with a TV program guide showing 11:45 p.m. Pacific - 2:45 a.m. in Maryland - creating a recorded alibi.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1586</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Called While They Searched: The Mailbox, The Letter, The Trap</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-called-while-they-searched-the-mailbox-the-letter-the-trap--72879062</link><description><![CDATA[He Called While They Searched: The Mailbox, The Letter, The Trap<br /><br />A father watched from a second‑floor window as his daughter's car sat idling at the mailbox and she vanished; two days later a cream‑colored envelope arrived at that same mailbox containing two pages in her handwriting that read like a will. The investigators confirmed the handwriting as Shari's and the phone call to the family came while searchers still combed the area - who called, and why leave a letter that reads like instructions for your own burial?<br /><br />In this episode, we recount the disappearance of seventeen‑year‑old Shari Faye Smith on May 31, 1985, the search that spanned 500 square miles, the early FBI and sheriff decisions, and the unsettling letter and phone call that followed. Listen to how the timeline, the evidence, and one chilling phrase - "Casket closed" - created a case that refused the simplest explanations.<br /><br />Person: Shari Faye Smith<br />Date: May 31, 1985<br />Location: Lexington, South Carolina<br />Case: Active disappearance investigated by Lexington County Sheriff's Office and FBI Columbia office<br />Search area: 500 square miles<br /><br />- Shari was seventeen years old when she pulled up to the family mailbox on Friday, May 31, 1985.<br />- Robert Smith saw Shari's car from a second‑floor window with the engine running and the door open but no sign of her.<br />- Assistant Sheriff Lewis McCarty classified the incident as an active disappearance immediately, foregoing the 24‑hour wait.<br />- At 2:30 a.m. on June 3 a man called the Smiths asking for Hilda Smith and promised a letter would arrive by mail.<br />- On June 3 a cream‑colored envelope arrived at the same mailbox containing two pages on yellow legal paper in Shari's confirmed handwriting including the phrase "Casket closed."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879062</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:48 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879062/0585.mp3" length="27084019" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Called While They Searched: The Mailbox, The Letter, The Trap&#13;
&#13;
A father watched from a second‑floor window as his daughter's car sat idling at the mailbox and she vanished; two days later a cream‑colored envelope arrived at that same mailbox...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Called While They Searched: The Mailbox, The Letter, The Trap<br /><br />A father watched from a second‑floor window as his daughter's car sat idling at the mailbox and she vanished; two days later a cream‑colored envelope arrived at that same mailbox containing two pages in her handwriting that read like a will. The investigators confirmed the handwriting as Shari's and the phone call to the family came while searchers still combed the area - who called, and why leave a letter that reads like instructions for your own burial?<br /><br />In this episode, we recount the disappearance of seventeen‑year‑old Shari Faye Smith on May 31, 1985, the search that spanned 500 square miles, the early FBI and sheriff decisions, and the unsettling letter and phone call that followed. Listen to how the timeline, the evidence, and one chilling phrase - "Casket closed" - created a case that refused the simplest explanations.<br /><br />Person: Shari Faye Smith<br />Date: May 31, 1985<br />Location: Lexington, South Carolina<br />Case: Active disappearance investigated by Lexington County Sheriff's Office and FBI Columbia office<br />Search area: 500 square miles<br /><br />- Shari was seventeen years old when she pulled up to the family mailbox on Friday, May 31, 1985.<br />- Robert Smith saw Shari's car from a second‑floor window with the engine running and the door open but no sign of her.<br />- Assistant Sheriff Lewis McCarty classified the incident as an active disappearance immediately, foregoing the 24‑hour wait.<br />- At 2:30 a.m. on June 3 a man called the Smiths asking for Hilda Smith and promised a letter would arrive by mail.<br />- On June 3 a cream‑colored envelope arrived at the same mailbox containing two pages on yellow legal paper in Shari's confirmed handwriting including the phrase "Casket closed."<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1693</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Wrote Numbers on Her Hand - Thrown From a Truck Cab</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-wrote-numbers-on-her-hand-thrown-from-a-truck-cab--72879061</link><description><![CDATA[She Wrote Numbers on Her Hand - Thrown From a Truck Cab<br /><br />Cold and deliberate: a seventeen-year-old was found bound in a snowbank, dead within four minutes of a rope around her neck, her only contacts scrawled in permanent marker on her palm. The numbers on her hand became the key to a nameless body found beside an interstate-so who drove the truck that dumped her, and why was she carrying only inked phone numbers when she had nowhere else to put them?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a Maine residential school to a Pennsylvania highway, tracing the last known hours of Dawn Marie Birnbaum and the investigative lead born from fuel receipts and a string of truck stops. How did a day spent within earshot of truckers at a truck stop end with her body thrown from a tractor-trailer?<br /><br />Person: Dawn Marie Birnbaum<br />Date found: March 24, 1993<br />Location: snowbank beside an interstate near Bellefonte, Pennsylvania<br />Age: 17<br />Identified by: phone numbers written in permanent marker on left palm<br /><br />- Forensic testimony concluded Dawn was dead within four minutes after a rope was knotted around her neck.<br />- She was found wearing only socks, underwear, and a sweater, with hands bound and wallet missing.<br />- She disappeared from Poland Spring, Maine after slipping away on March 21, 1993 to hitchhike to Dysart's Truck Stop.<br />- Dawn spent March 22, 1993 standing within about 15 feet of the Dysart's pay phones calling contacts all day.<br />- Fuel receipts linked a single truck driver as refueling at Dysart's on the morning of March 22 and at a station in Milesburg, Pennsylvania hours before her body was discovered.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879061</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:45 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879061/0584.mp3" length="26874621" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Wrote Numbers on Her Hand - Thrown From a Truck Cab&#13;
&#13;
Cold and deliberate: a seventeen-year-old was found bound in a snowbank, dead within four minutes of a rope around her neck, her only contacts scrawled in permanent marker on her palm. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Wrote Numbers on Her Hand - Thrown From a Truck Cab<br /><br />Cold and deliberate: a seventeen-year-old was found bound in a snowbank, dead within four minutes of a rope around her neck, her only contacts scrawled in permanent marker on her palm. The numbers on her hand became the key to a nameless body found beside an interstate-so who drove the truck that dumped her, and why was she carrying only inked phone numbers when she had nowhere else to put them?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from a Maine residential school to a Pennsylvania highway, tracing the last known hours of Dawn Marie Birnbaum and the investigative lead born from fuel receipts and a string of truck stops. How did a day spent within earshot of truckers at a truck stop end with her body thrown from a tractor-trailer?<br /><br />Person: Dawn Marie Birnbaum<br />Date found: March 24, 1993<br />Location: snowbank beside an interstate near Bellefonte, Pennsylvania<br />Age: 17<br />Identified by: phone numbers written in permanent marker on left palm<br /><br />- Forensic testimony concluded Dawn was dead within four minutes after a rope was knotted around her neck.<br />- She was found wearing only socks, underwear, and a sweater, with hands bound and wallet missing.<br />- She disappeared from Poland Spring, Maine after slipping away on March 21, 1993 to hitchhike to Dysart's Truck Stop.<br />- Dawn spent March 22, 1993 standing within about 15 feet of the Dysart's pay phones calling contacts all day.<br />- Fuel receipts linked a single truck driver as refueling at Dysart's on the morning of March 22 and at a station in Milesburg, Pennsylvania hours before her body was discovered.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1680</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Iron Bars That Kept a Child Trapped With Death</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-iron-bars-that-kept-a-child-trapped-with-death--72879060</link><description><![CDATA[The Iron Bars That Kept a Child Trapped With Death<br /><br />The iron bars meant to keep danger out became the same bars that kept neighbors thirty feet away the night a three-year-old was taken; the phone lines were cut, a .357 was used, and four minutes turned a house into a crime scene. How did planning and one welded decision turn protection into a perfect trap?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the full narrative of the May 20, 1988 attack that left Evelyn Banks and her son André dead and connected a Dallas lake bed to a forest grave in southern Oklahoma. We outline who was involved, what happened inside the locked house, and why one piece of physical evidence tied distant scenes together.<br /><br />Person: Sam Wright<br />Person: Gino Camacho<br />Person: André Banks<br />Date: May 20, 1988<br />Weapon: .357 revolver<br /><br />- Four men arrived at the house after midnight and cut the phone lines and a padlock before entry.<br />- David Wilburn, 25 years old, was shot once in the back of the head inside the house.<br />- André was three years old when he and his mother Evelyn were taken and later found dead in a forest in southern Oklahoma.<br />- Sam Wright had welded iron bars across the windows and reinforced doors that prevented neighbors from entering.<br />- Gino Camacho, 33, operated as a high-volume marijuana distributor and led the crew that removed Evelyn and André.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879060</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879060/0583.mp3" length="28404770" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Iron Bars That Kept a Child Trapped With Death&#13;
&#13;
The iron bars meant to keep danger out became the same bars that kept neighbors thirty feet away the night a three-year-old was taken; the phone lines were cut, a .357 was used, and four minutes...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Iron Bars That Kept a Child Trapped With Death<br /><br />The iron bars meant to keep danger out became the same bars that kept neighbors thirty feet away the night a three-year-old was taken; the phone lines were cut, a .357 was used, and four minutes turned a house into a crime scene. How did planning and one welded decision turn protection into a perfect trap?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the full narrative of the May 20, 1988 attack that left Evelyn Banks and her son André dead and connected a Dallas lake bed to a forest grave in southern Oklahoma. We outline who was involved, what happened inside the locked house, and why one piece of physical evidence tied distant scenes together.<br /><br />Person: Sam Wright<br />Person: Gino Camacho<br />Person: André Banks<br />Date: May 20, 1988<br />Weapon: .357 revolver<br /><br />- Four men arrived at the house after midnight and cut the phone lines and a padlock before entry.<br />- David Wilburn, 25 years old, was shot once in the back of the head inside the house.<br />- André was three years old when he and his mother Evelyn were taken and later found dead in a forest in southern Oklahoma.<br />- Sam Wright had welded iron bars across the windows and reinforced doors that prevented neighbors from entering.<br />- Gino Camacho, 33, operated as a high-volume marijuana distributor and led the crew that removed Evelyn and André.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1776</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Bakery Killer's Map: 37 X's, One Girl's Escape</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-bakery-killer-s-map-37-x-s-one-girl-s-escape--72879059</link><description><![CDATA[The Bakery Killer's Map: 37 X's, One Girl's Escape<br /><br />She ran barefoot along an Anchorage highway, handcuffed and partially dressed, and climbed into a truck that took her to safety-yet the police quietly suspended the case. A bakery owner named Robert Hansen told investigators a different story, consented to searches, and kept his ordinary life; one officer kept pulling until an aerial map in a bedroom changed everything. How did thirty-seven X’s on that map become the only hint of how many victims there might be?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from the morning Cindy Paulson escaped to the clues found in searches and the landscape around Anchorage, following the officer who refused to let the case go cold and asking what the marks on a hidden map really mean.<br /><br />Person: Cindy Paulson<br />Date: June 13, 1983<br />Location: Anchorage, Alaska<br />Person: Robert Hansen<br />Event: Remains of Sherry Morrow found August 13, 1982<br /><br />- Cindy Paulson was seventeen years old on the morning she escaped handcuffed along an Anchorage highway.<br />- Robert Hansen had lived in Alaska for roughly sixteen years by June 1983 after moving from Iowa around 1967.<br />- Twelve women were reported missing from the Anchorage area between 1980 and 1983, recorded in the investigative record.<br />- Sherry Morrow’s remains were found in a shallow grave near the Knik River about twenty miles outside Anchorage on August 13, 1982.<br />- A .223 caliber shell casing was discovered near Sherry Morrow’s grave; her gold arrowhead pendant was missing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879059</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:38 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879059/0582.mp3" length="28464120" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Bakery Killer's Map: 37 X's, One Girl's Escape&#13;
&#13;
She ran barefoot along an Anchorage highway, handcuffed and partially dressed, and climbed into a truck that took her to safety-yet the police quietly suspended the case. A bakery owner named...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Bakery Killer's Map: 37 X's, One Girl's Escape<br /><br />She ran barefoot along an Anchorage highway, handcuffed and partially dressed, and climbed into a truck that took her to safety-yet the police quietly suspended the case. A bakery owner named Robert Hansen told investigators a different story, consented to searches, and kept his ordinary life; one officer kept pulling until an aerial map in a bedroom changed everything. How did thirty-seven X’s on that map become the only hint of how many victims there might be?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events from the morning Cindy Paulson escaped to the clues found in searches and the landscape around Anchorage, following the officer who refused to let the case go cold and asking what the marks on a hidden map really mean.<br /><br />Person: Cindy Paulson<br />Date: June 13, 1983<br />Location: Anchorage, Alaska<br />Person: Robert Hansen<br />Event: Remains of Sherry Morrow found August 13, 1982<br /><br />- Cindy Paulson was seventeen years old on the morning she escaped handcuffed along an Anchorage highway.<br />- Robert Hansen had lived in Alaska for roughly sixteen years by June 1983 after moving from Iowa around 1967.<br />- Twelve women were reported missing from the Anchorage area between 1980 and 1983, recorded in the investigative record.<br />- Sherry Morrow’s remains were found in a shallow grave near the Knik River about twenty miles outside Anchorage on August 13, 1982.<br />- A .223 caliber shell casing was discovered near Sherry Morrow’s grave; her gold arrowhead pendant was missing.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1779</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Locked House, Silent Bullet: Who Hired the Judge's Executioner?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/locked-house-silent-bullet-who-hired-the-judge-s-executioner--72879058</link><description><![CDATA[Locked House, Silent Bullet: Who Hired the Judge's Executioner?<br /><br />A locked Biloxi house, nine shots, and two bodies found nearly 48 hours later: a judge and his wife killed with a homemade suppressor while neighbors slept. The quiet precision, stolen car with removed dome light, and a suspect who called the police himself force one chilling question: who used ordinary trust to arrange two executions?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the discovery on September 16, 1987 through the clues that turned a domestic theory into a federal probe. We follow the crime scene details, the prison-run scam that funneled hundreds of thousands, and the threads linking a sitting judge’s associate to the murders - but how did it all connect back to a prisoner running scams from inside Angola?<br /><br />Date: September 14-16, 1987<br />Location: Biloxi, Mississippi<br />Person: Vincent Sherry<br />Person: Margaret Sherry<br />Person: Pete Halat<br /><br />- Two victims shot in the head in separate rooms and found dead nearly 48 hours after the murders.<br />- Nine casings from a .22-caliber semiautomatic pistol recovered at the scene.<br />- Small fragments of foam rubber with gunshot residue indicated a homemade suppressor was used.<br />- The getaway car was a stolen Ford Fairmont with dome light removed and sun visors pulled down.<br />- The stolen license plates were traced to a Biloxi locksmith named Lenny Swetman.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879058</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:34 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879058/0581.mp3" length="29398259" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Locked House, Silent Bullet: Who Hired the Judge's Executioner?&#13;
&#13;
A locked Biloxi house, nine shots, and two bodies found nearly 48 hours later: a judge and his wife killed with a homemade suppressor while neighbors slept. The quiet precision, stolen...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Locked House, Silent Bullet: Who Hired the Judge's Executioner?<br /><br />A locked Biloxi house, nine shots, and two bodies found nearly 48 hours later: a judge and his wife killed with a homemade suppressor while neighbors slept. The quiet precision, stolen car with removed dome light, and a suspect who called the police himself force one chilling question: who used ordinary trust to arrange two executions?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the discovery on September 16, 1987 through the clues that turned a domestic theory into a federal probe. We follow the crime scene details, the prison-run scam that funneled hundreds of thousands, and the threads linking a sitting judge’s associate to the murders - but how did it all connect back to a prisoner running scams from inside Angola?<br /><br />Date: September 14-16, 1987<br />Location: Biloxi, Mississippi<br />Person: Vincent Sherry<br />Person: Margaret Sherry<br />Person: Pete Halat<br /><br />- Two victims shot in the head in separate rooms and found dead nearly 48 hours after the murders.<br />- Nine casings from a .22-caliber semiautomatic pistol recovered at the scene.<br />- Small fragments of foam rubber with gunshot residue indicated a homemade suppressor was used.<br />- The getaway car was a stolen Ford Fairmont with dome light removed and sun visors pulled down.<br />- The stolen license plates were traced to a Biloxi locksmith named Lenny Swetman.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1838</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Half an Inch: The Woman Who Flies To Death Row Every Week</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/half-an-inch-the-woman-who-flies-to-death-row-every-week--72879057</link><description><![CDATA[Half an Inch: The Woman Who Flies To Death Row Every Week<br /><br />A British woman flies across the Atlantic every weekend to press her hand to a glass and sit with a man on Indiana's death row; he says a single half-inch of trajectory is the difference between a dead officer and a life not sentenced to die. How did a string of stolen wheel rims and a shot fired "to scare" become a marriage that survives a death sentence?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Benjamin Richie and the woman who began writing to him from Hertfordshire, tracing the crime, the trial, and the life they built in the impossible geometry of distance and consequence - and ask whether love can change the shape of a punishment meant to be final.<br /><br />Person: Benjamin Richie<br />Location: Indiana State Prison<br />Age: 32<br />Event: Shooting of a Beachgrove police officer during a stolen wheel-rims incident<br />Origin: Hertfordshire, England<br /><br />- Richie has been at Indiana State Prison since he was nineteen.<br />- Indiana State Prison houses approximately 1,900 men and a unit of twelve men with no release date.<br />- Richie was twenty at the time of the incident and on parole for robbery.<br />- The woman from Hertfordshire began writing to Richie four years ago and now visits every weekend.<br />- Richie told jurors the bullet would have missed if it had landed half an inch lower.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879057</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:30 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879057/0580.mp3" length="23456551" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Half an Inch: The Woman Who Flies To Death Row Every Week&#13;
&#13;
A British woman flies across the Atlantic every weekend to press her hand to a glass and sit with a man on Indiana's death row; he says a single half-inch of trajectory is the difference...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Half an Inch: The Woman Who Flies To Death Row Every Week<br /><br />A British woman flies across the Atlantic every weekend to press her hand to a glass and sit with a man on Indiana's death row; he says a single half-inch of trajectory is the difference between a dead officer and a life not sentenced to die. How did a string of stolen wheel rims and a shot fired "to scare" become a marriage that survives a death sentence?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the story of Benjamin Richie and the woman who began writing to him from Hertfordshire, tracing the crime, the trial, and the life they built in the impossible geometry of distance and consequence - and ask whether love can change the shape of a punishment meant to be final.<br /><br />Person: Benjamin Richie<br />Location: Indiana State Prison<br />Age: 32<br />Event: Shooting of a Beachgrove police officer during a stolen wheel-rims incident<br />Origin: Hertfordshire, England<br /><br />- Richie has been at Indiana State Prison since he was nineteen.<br />- Indiana State Prison houses approximately 1,900 men and a unit of twelve men with no release date.<br />- Richie was twenty at the time of the incident and on parole for robbery.<br />- The woman from Hertfordshire began writing to Richie four years ago and now visits every weekend.<br />- Richie told jurors the bullet would have missed if it had landed half an inch lower.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1466</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Christmas Eve, 30 Minutes, and the Cop Who Ordered a Murder</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/christmas-eve-30-minutes-and-the-cop-who-ordered-a-murder--72879056</link><description><![CDATA[Christmas Eve, 30 Minutes, and the Cop Who Ordered a Murder<br /><br />A single 30-minute phone call on Christmas Eve turned a small-time dealer into the government's key witness and set off an FBI operation that would bring down entire layers of the New Orleans Police Department. The wiretap-led sting, recorded meetings, and one taped conversation changed a routine extortion case into a corruption net that reached a cop later convicted of murder - but how did that half-hour decide everything?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the chain of events from December 24, 1993, when Terry Adams (Scab-boo) received a $10,000 extortion demand, through the FBI's Shattered Shield operation built by Special Agent Stan Hatton, to the Hotel Sheraton meeting where undercover asset Juan Jackson entered the case - and we ask whether that single call really made the difference.<br /><br />Person: Terry Adams (Scab-boo)<br />Person: Special Agent Stan Hatton<br />Person: Len Davis<br />Person: Sammy Williams<br />Event: Shattered Shield operation<br /><br />- On December 24, 1993, Scab-boo was ordered to pay $10,000 before 6:00 PM.<br />- At 5:00 PM on that night, Stan Hatton picked up Scab-boo's call and decided to make him an informant within thirty minutes.<br />- Shattered Shield ultimately brought down 15 police officers and produced 18 narcotics convictions.<br />- In mid-January 1994, a recorded meeting with Sammy Williams produced a tape where Len Davis used coded drug-trade language.<br />- By April 1994, the FBI had enough evidence to arrest Sammy Williams twice but held action to allow deeper infiltration.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879056</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:26 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879056/0579.mp3" length="25731921" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Christmas Eve, 30 Minutes, and the Cop Who Ordered a Murder&#13;
&#13;
A single 30-minute phone call on Christmas Eve turned a small-time dealer into the government's key witness and set off an FBI operation that would bring down entire layers of the New...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Christmas Eve, 30 Minutes, and the Cop Who Ordered a Murder<br /><br />A single 30-minute phone call on Christmas Eve turned a small-time dealer into the government's key witness and set off an FBI operation that would bring down entire layers of the New Orleans Police Department. The wiretap-led sting, recorded meetings, and one taped conversation changed a routine extortion case into a corruption net that reached a cop later convicted of murder - but how did that half-hour decide everything?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the chain of events from December 24, 1993, when Terry Adams (Scab-boo) received a $10,000 extortion demand, through the FBI's Shattered Shield operation built by Special Agent Stan Hatton, to the Hotel Sheraton meeting where undercover asset Juan Jackson entered the case - and we ask whether that single call really made the difference.<br /><br />Person: Terry Adams (Scab-boo)<br />Person: Special Agent Stan Hatton<br />Person: Len Davis<br />Person: Sammy Williams<br />Event: Shattered Shield operation<br /><br />- On December 24, 1993, Scab-boo was ordered to pay $10,000 before 6:00 PM.<br />- At 5:00 PM on that night, Stan Hatton picked up Scab-boo's call and decided to make him an informant within thirty minutes.<br />- Shattered Shield ultimately brought down 15 police officers and produced 18 narcotics convictions.<br />- In mid-January 1994, a recorded meeting with Sammy Williams produced a tape where Len Davis used coded drug-trade language.<br />- By April 1994, the FBI had enough evidence to arrest Sammy Williams twice but held action to allow deeper infiltration.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1609</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Vanished Leaving His Glasses - The Noel Bank Drowning Mystery</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-vanished-leaving-his-glasses-the-noel-bank-drowning-mystery--72879054</link><description><![CDATA[He Vanished Leaving His Glasses - The Noel Bank Drowning Mystery<br /><br />A small-town bank was emptied in the night and the president, a man who never left home without his glasses, disappeared leaving those glasses on his nightstand - then divers pulled him from Grand Lake five days later, still bound to a chair. Who knew the bank's vault standby setting, moved 320 pounds of coins and $71,000, and left $100,000 in plain sight?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the morning the State Bank of Noel was found open to the discovery of Dan Short's body, covering the crime scene details, witness sightings of multiple vehicles, and the oddest inconsistencies investigators faced - including an unlocked drawer with $100,000 and a spray-painted, bullet-riddled camera. What was planned, what was missed, and who left the one clue that would destroy them?<br /><br />Person: Dan Short<br />Date: October 6, 1989<br />Location: State Bank of Noel, Noel, Missouri / Grand Lake, Oklahoma<br />Amount taken: over $71,000 plus 320 pounds of coins<br />Amount left unsecured: more than $100,000<br /><br />- The security camera above the bank entrance had been spray-painted and shot, with .45 caliber casings on the floor beneath it.<br />- Divers recovered Dan Short from Grand Lake, Oklahoma, five days after he vanished, still bound to a chair.<br />- The bank vault was emptied of over $71,000 and 320 pounds of coins overnight.<br />- An unlocked drawer in the bank's back office contained more than $100,000 in bills that the perpetrators did not take.<br />- Witness Carol Dryden observed multiple vehicles on Short's property around 2:00 a.m., and truck driver Buddy Mills saw three vehicles leaving town together about an hour later.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879054</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879054/0578.mp3" length="21241785" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Vanished Leaving His Glasses - The Noel Bank Drowning Mystery&#13;
&#13;
A small-town bank was emptied in the night and the president, a man who never left home without his glasses, disappeared leaving those glasses on his nightstand - then divers pulled...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Vanished Leaving His Glasses - The Noel Bank Drowning Mystery<br /><br />A small-town bank was emptied in the night and the president, a man who never left home without his glasses, disappeared leaving those glasses on his nightstand - then divers pulled him from Grand Lake five days later, still bound to a chair. Who knew the bank's vault standby setting, moved 320 pounds of coins and $71,000, and left $100,000 in plain sight?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the morning the State Bank of Noel was found open to the discovery of Dan Short's body, covering the crime scene details, witness sightings of multiple vehicles, and the oddest inconsistencies investigators faced - including an unlocked drawer with $100,000 and a spray-painted, bullet-riddled camera. What was planned, what was missed, and who left the one clue that would destroy them?<br /><br />Person: Dan Short<br />Date: October 6, 1989<br />Location: State Bank of Noel, Noel, Missouri / Grand Lake, Oklahoma<br />Amount taken: over $71,000 plus 320 pounds of coins<br />Amount left unsecured: more than $100,000<br /><br />- The security camera above the bank entrance had been spray-painted and shot, with .45 caliber casings on the floor beneath it.<br />- Divers recovered Dan Short from Grand Lake, Oklahoma, five days after he vanished, still bound to a chair.<br />- The bank vault was emptied of over $71,000 and 320 pounds of coins overnight.<br />- An unlocked drawer in the bank's back office contained more than $100,000 in bills that the perpetrators did not take.<br />- Witness Carol Dryden observed multiple vehicles on Short's property around 2:00 a.m., and truck driver Buddy Mills saw three vehicles leaving town together about an hour later.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1328</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Took Her From the Carnival: The Man Without a Car</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-took-her-from-the-carnival-the-man-without-a-car--72879053</link><description><![CDATA[He Took Her From the Carnival: The Man Without a Car<br /><br />A nine-year-old vanished from a Kenosha carnival and was found three weeks later wrapped in a man's corduroy jacket, bound with television cable - the man who took her had no car and moved through six states by bicycle and taxi. By the time a single fingerprint linked him to the abandoned building where her body was found, he and the woman with him had already crossed state lines and the death toll would reach seven. How did so many pieces - a taxi ride, a scrap yard watchman, a cooperating girlfriend - fail to stop this trail of killings?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the May 29, 1984 carnival disappearance to the discoveries in Indiana and Ohio, detailing the movements, the eyewitness identifications, and the forensic moment that should have changed everything - but didn't. What gaps in the investigation allowed them to keep moving and killing?<br /><br />Person: Alton Coleman<br />Person: Deborah Brown<br />Date: May 29, 1984<br />Location: Kenosha, Wisconsin<br />Event: Vernita Wheat found June 19, 1984<br /><br />- Vernita Wheat was nine years old when she left for the neighborhood carnival on May 29, 1984.<br />- Vernita's body was found June 19, 1984, wrapped in a man's corduroy jacket with hands, feet, and neck bound by television cable.<br />- Coleman was thirty years old in spring 1984 and used the alias Robert Knight at times.<br />- A single fingerprint from the abandoned Waukegan building placed Coleman at the location where Vernita's body was found.<br />- On June 16, 1984, Mary James (age nine) identified Coleman from photographs and described Deborah Brown in detail, matching her appearance though Mary had never seen Brown before.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879053</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879053/0577.mp3" length="24782735" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Took Her From the Carnival: The Man Without a Car&#13;
&#13;
A nine-year-old vanished from a Kenosha carnival and was found three weeks later wrapped in a man's corduroy jacket, bound with television cable - the man who took her had no car and moved...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Took Her From the Carnival: The Man Without a Car<br /><br />A nine-year-old vanished from a Kenosha carnival and was found three weeks later wrapped in a man's corduroy jacket, bound with television cable - the man who took her had no car and moved through six states by bicycle and taxi. By the time a single fingerprint linked him to the abandoned building where her body was found, he and the woman with him had already crossed state lines and the death toll would reach seven. How did so many pieces - a taxi ride, a scrap yard watchman, a cooperating girlfriend - fail to stop this trail of killings?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the May 29, 1984 carnival disappearance to the discoveries in Indiana and Ohio, detailing the movements, the eyewitness identifications, and the forensic moment that should have changed everything - but didn't. What gaps in the investigation allowed them to keep moving and killing?<br /><br />Person: Alton Coleman<br />Person: Deborah Brown<br />Date: May 29, 1984<br />Location: Kenosha, Wisconsin<br />Event: Vernita Wheat found June 19, 1984<br /><br />- Vernita Wheat was nine years old when she left for the neighborhood carnival on May 29, 1984.<br />- Vernita's body was found June 19, 1984, wrapped in a man's corduroy jacket with hands, feet, and neck bound by television cable.<br />- Coleman was thirty years old in spring 1984 and used the alias Robert Knight at times.<br />- A single fingerprint from the abandoned Waukegan building placed Coleman at the location where Vernita's body was found.<br />- On June 16, 1984, Mary James (age nine) identified Coleman from photographs and described Deborah Brown in detail, matching her appearance though Mary had never seen Brown before.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1549</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Whispered His Name Before Dying - Murder in a Silent Taxi</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-whispered-his-name-before-dying-murder-in-a-silent-taxi--72879052</link><description><![CDATA[He Whispered His Name Before Dying - Murder in a Silent Taxi<br /><br />The night was so quiet a running engine and spinning rear wheels sounded like nothing unusual, yet a man would die after saying only his own name to a paramedic. Investigators found approximately thirty stab wounds, a snapped kitchen knife, fifty fingerprints and a DNA profile that matched no one in New Zealand - so how do you catch a killer who leaves perfect evidence but no identity?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the 4:30 a.m. discovery of a taxi crashed into a tree on View Road to the unfolding Operation Edgewater, and we ask how a homicide with clear forensic traces led investigators into an international legal maze.<br /><br />Person: Hiren Mohini<br />Date: fourth of February<br />Location: View Road, Auckland<br />Case: Operation Edgewater<br />Evidence: Male A DNA from taxi door handle<br /><br />- Time of discovery: approximately 4:30 a.m.<br />- Final GPS pick-up: Sky City casino taxi rank at approximately 1:13 a.m.<br />- Number of stab and cut wounds: approximately thirty, including defensive wounds<br />- Number of fingerprints lifted from the taxi: fifty<br />- Knife condition: small kitchen knife snapped in two; parts recovered in rear and front footwells and handle behind driver's seat<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879052</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:17 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879052/0576.mp3" length="27060613" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Whispered His Name Before Dying - Murder in a Silent Taxi&#13;
&#13;
The night was so quiet a running engine and spinning rear wheels sounded like nothing unusual, yet a man would die after saying only his own name to a paramedic. Investigators found...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Whispered His Name Before Dying - Murder in a Silent Taxi<br /><br />The night was so quiet a running engine and spinning rear wheels sounded like nothing unusual, yet a man would die after saying only his own name to a paramedic. Investigators found approximately thirty stab wounds, a snapped kitchen knife, fifty fingerprints and a DNA profile that matched no one in New Zealand - so how do you catch a killer who leaves perfect evidence but no identity?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the 4:30 a.m. discovery of a taxi crashed into a tree on View Road to the unfolding Operation Edgewater, and we ask how a homicide with clear forensic traces led investigators into an international legal maze.<br /><br />Person: Hiren Mohini<br />Date: fourth of February<br />Location: View Road, Auckland<br />Case: Operation Edgewater<br />Evidence: Male A DNA from taxi door handle<br /><br />- Time of discovery: approximately 4:30 a.m.<br />- Final GPS pick-up: Sky City casino taxi rank at approximately 1:13 a.m.<br />- Number of stab and cut wounds: approximately thirty, including defensive wounds<br />- Number of fingerprints lifted from the taxi: fifty<br />- Knife condition: small kitchen knife snapped in two; parts recovered in rear and front footwells and handle behind driver's seat<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1692</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Song That Played 238 Times: How Marie Vanished at Home</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-song-that-played-238-times-how-marie-vanished-at-home--72879050</link><description><![CDATA[The Song That Played 238 Times: How Marie Vanished at Home<br /><br />A single song looped 238 times through the night while a fifteen-year-old girl, Marie Davis, was already gone - the computer kept playing from just after 3:00 a.m. until about 6:30 a.m. with no one to stop it, and her phone later pinged towers moving north toward Kaiapoi. Who was in the house that night, and why did the playback stop mid-loop?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the signal traces, the items recovered from the river and the people who appeared in the search, and ask whether the orderly house and the looping music hide a deliberate disappearance or something far darker. Can the pattern of phone signals, the computer log and the river evidence point to what happened?<br /><br />Person: Marie Davis<br />Age: 15<br />Date missing: 23 July 2006<br />Location: Papanui, Christchurch, New Zealand<br />Search duration: 17 days<br /><br />- The computer logged continuous song playback from shortly after 3:00 a.m. until approximately 6:30 a.m., when an attempted shutdown stopped the song mid-loop.<br />- Marie sent a text at 8:20 p.m. on 18 July 2006; her phone then went silent that night and later received a text at 10:10 a.m. the next morning.<br />- The phone signal was traced at 10:10 a.m. to the Belfast area north of Christchurch, and seven minutes later to around Kaiapoi.<br />- Seventeen days after her disappearance, Marie’s unclothed body was found floating in the Waimakariri River, approximately 9 kilometers north of the original search area.<br />- Investigators recovered 15 items from the river over 12 days, including bedding, a bra with a severely bent clasp, a wallet, lengths of yellow rope and a fragment of a disposable glove.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879050</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:13 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879050/0575.mp3" length="27304283" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Song That Played 238 Times: How Marie Vanished at Home&#13;
&#13;
A single song looped 238 times through the night while a fifteen-year-old girl, Marie Davis, was already gone - the computer kept playing from just after 3:00 a.m. until about 6:30 a.m....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Song That Played 238 Times: How Marie Vanished at Home<br /><br />A single song looped 238 times through the night while a fifteen-year-old girl, Marie Davis, was already gone - the computer kept playing from just after 3:00 a.m. until about 6:30 a.m. with no one to stop it, and her phone later pinged towers moving north toward Kaiapoi. Who was in the house that night, and why did the playback stop mid-loop?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline, the signal traces, the items recovered from the river and the people who appeared in the search, and ask whether the orderly house and the looping music hide a deliberate disappearance or something far darker. Can the pattern of phone signals, the computer log and the river evidence point to what happened?<br /><br />Person: Marie Davis<br />Age: 15<br />Date missing: 23 July 2006<br />Location: Papanui, Christchurch, New Zealand<br />Search duration: 17 days<br /><br />- The computer logged continuous song playback from shortly after 3:00 a.m. until approximately 6:30 a.m., when an attempted shutdown stopped the song mid-loop.<br />- Marie sent a text at 8:20 p.m. on 18 July 2006; her phone then went silent that night and later received a text at 10:10 a.m. the next morning.<br />- The phone signal was traced at 10:10 a.m. to the Belfast area north of Christchurch, and seven minutes later to around Kaiapoi.<br />- Seventeen days after her disappearance, Marie’s unclothed body was found floating in the Waimakariri River, approximately 9 kilometers north of the original search area.<br />- Investigators recovered 15 items from the river over 12 days, including bedding, a bra with a severely bent clasp, a wallet, lengths of yellow rope and a fragment of a disposable glove.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1707</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Boy Who Led a Child Away: The Uncomfortable CCTV Hand</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-boy-who-led-a-child-away-the-uncomfortable-cctv-hand--72879049</link><description><![CDATA[The Boy Who Led a Child Away: The Uncomfortable CCTV Hand<br /><br />The CCTV shows a two-year-old walking out of a shopping centre alone, and fourteen seconds later a hand reaches down and takes his; two days after that his body was found nearly three miles away on a railway line on Valentine's Day. Why did thirty-seven people see a crying, bleeding toddler being led through town by two ten-year-old boys and not stop?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline recorded by security cameras and witness statements to reconstruct what happened between a butcher’s shop at 3:39 p.m. and the discovery two days later. We cover the footage, the route taken, the people involved, and the single unresolved question that haunts the case.<br /><br />Date: February 12, 1993<br />Location: The Strand shopping centre, Bootle, Merseyside<br />Person: James Bulger, age 2<br />Perpetrators: Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, both age 10<br />Distance: nearly 3 miles walked from the Strand to Walton<br /><br />- At 3:39 p.m. James appears on camera alone wearing a light blue jacket and dark trousers.<br />- At 3:41 p.m. a camera on the upper level shows James following two boys; at 3:42 p.m. one boy is holding his hand.<br />- Thirty-seven separate witnesses saw the three children walking through Bootle and Walton that afternoon.<br />- The two ten-year-old boys had skipped school that day; attendance records confirm truancy.<br />- James’s body was found two days later on Valentine's Day on a railway line about 100 metres from Walton Lane police station.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879049</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:09 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879049/0574.mp3" length="25351996" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Boy Who Led a Child Away: The Uncomfortable CCTV Hand&#13;
&#13;
The CCTV shows a two-year-old walking out of a shopping centre alone, and fourteen seconds later a hand reaches down and takes his; two days after that his body was found nearly three miles...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Boy Who Led a Child Away: The Uncomfortable CCTV Hand<br /><br />The CCTV shows a two-year-old walking out of a shopping centre alone, and fourteen seconds later a hand reaches down and takes his; two days after that his body was found nearly three miles away on a railway line on Valentine's Day. Why did thirty-seven people see a crying, bleeding toddler being led through town by two ten-year-old boys and not stop?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline recorded by security cameras and witness statements to reconstruct what happened between a butcher’s shop at 3:39 p.m. and the discovery two days later. We cover the footage, the route taken, the people involved, and the single unresolved question that haunts the case.<br /><br />Date: February 12, 1993<br />Location: The Strand shopping centre, Bootle, Merseyside<br />Person: James Bulger, age 2<br />Perpetrators: Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, both age 10<br />Distance: nearly 3 miles walked from the Strand to Walton<br /><br />- At 3:39 p.m. James appears on camera alone wearing a light blue jacket and dark trousers.<br />- At 3:41 p.m. a camera on the upper level shows James following two boys; at 3:42 p.m. one boy is holding his hand.<br />- Thirty-seven separate witnesses saw the three children walking through Bootle and Walton that afternoon.<br />- The two ten-year-old boys had skipped school that day; attendance records confirm truancy.<br />- James’s body was found two days later on Valentine's Day on a railway line about 100 metres from Walton Lane police station.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1585</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Plowed Up: The Line of Toys That Pointed to Murder</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/plowed-up-the-line-of-toys-that-pointed-to-murder--72879047</link><description><![CDATA[Plowed Up: The Line of Toys That Pointed to Murder<br /><br />The ground gave up two bodies when a plow blade struck dirt in Heidelberg Township on April 9, 1995: a 26-year-old woman with a diaper bag and her four-month-old son, the baby’s rattle and bottles scattered in a precise line pointing back fifteen miles to a December morning. Who left that trail of toys and why did a single sentence to an eighteen-month-old shift the case from puzzling to unavoidable?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from 740 Front Street to the plowed field, tracing the physical clues found at the house, the car, and the burial site, and ask how those details fit together into an explanation that feels incomplete.<br /><br />Person: Joanne Katraneck<br />Person: Alex Katraneck<br />Person: Pat Rohrer<br />Date: December 15, 1994 (last confirmed call)<br />Date: April 9, 1995 (bodies recovered)<br /><br />- Two bodies were uncovered by a plow on April 9, 1995: a woman face up and a four-month-old boy face down on her chest.<br />- The baby wore the same blue onesie he had on the last morning he was seen alive.<br />- Bottles and a baby rattle were found scattered in a line along the field’s edge, spaced apart as if dropped one by one.<br />- Joanne’s tan Toyota was found the morning after she disappeared, backed into McCarty’s Tavern parking lot with her keys and pepper spray inside.<br />- Investigators found the rear basement door forcibly removed, tool marks, a cut cordless telephone line, and six hairs on the car’s driver headrest including one with a reddish stain matching Joanne’s blood.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879047</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879047/0573.mp3" length="25895343" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Plowed Up: The Line of Toys That Pointed to Murder&#13;
&#13;
The ground gave up two bodies when a plow blade struck dirt in Heidelberg Township on April 9, 1995: a 26-year-old woman with a diaper bag and her four-month-old son, the baby’s rattle and bottles...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Plowed Up: The Line of Toys That Pointed to Murder<br /><br />The ground gave up two bodies when a plow blade struck dirt in Heidelberg Township on April 9, 1995: a 26-year-old woman with a diaper bag and her four-month-old son, the baby’s rattle and bottles scattered in a precise line pointing back fifteen miles to a December morning. Who left that trail of toys and why did a single sentence to an eighteen-month-old shift the case from puzzling to unavoidable?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of events from 740 Front Street to the plowed field, tracing the physical clues found at the house, the car, and the burial site, and ask how those details fit together into an explanation that feels incomplete.<br /><br />Person: Joanne Katraneck<br />Person: Alex Katraneck<br />Person: Pat Rohrer<br />Date: December 15, 1994 (last confirmed call)<br />Date: April 9, 1995 (bodies recovered)<br /><br />- Two bodies were uncovered by a plow on April 9, 1995: a woman face up and a four-month-old boy face down on her chest.<br />- The baby wore the same blue onesie he had on the last morning he was seen alive.<br />- Bottles and a baby rattle were found scattered in a line along the field’s edge, spaced apart as if dropped one by one.<br />- Joanne’s tan Toyota was found the morning after she disappeared, backed into McCarty’s Tavern parking lot with her keys and pepper spray inside.<br />- Investigators found the rear basement door forcibly removed, tool marks, a cut cordless telephone line, and six hairs on the car’s driver headrest including one with a reddish stain matching Joanne’s blood.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1619</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>They Hid Her in the Trunk - How Power Sank Willow Springs</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/they-hid-her-in-the-trunk-how-power-sank-willow-springs--72879046</link><description><![CDATA[They Hid Her in the Trunk - How Power Sank Willow Springs<br /><br />A woman found shot and bludgeoned in the trunk of a Cadillac changed a suburban canal into a crime scene and exposed a town where eighty-two cars had been pulled from the water by March 1982. Who arranged the stopped clocks and why did the machinery of local power move in the same direction to bury her?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the timeline of Diane Masters’s disappearance and death, the people connected to her final night, and the official steps that followed; did the protections she relied on actually shield the town instead of her?<br /><br />Person: Diane Masters<br />Date: March 19, 1982<br />Location: Willow Springs, Illinois<br />Person: Alan Masters<br />Person: Michael Corbett<br /><br />- The Cadillac license plate was DGM-19 and the car was recovered from the sanitary canal with keys in the ignition and the engine running.<br />- Diane Masters’s wristwatch and the car dashboard clock were both stopped at exactly 1:50.<br />- Investigators pulled eighty-two vehicles from the canal the night they recovered the Cadillac.<br />- Diane, age 39, had been struck twice in the skull and then shot twice in the left cheekbone with a .22-caliber firearm.<br />- Alan Masters collected two insurance checks of $50,000 each from a $100,000 policy tied to travel to or from an official board meeting.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879046</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879046/0572.mp3" length="28673517" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>They Hid Her in the Trunk - How Power Sank Willow Springs&#13;
&#13;
A woman found shot and bludgeoned in the trunk of a Cadillac changed a suburban canal into a crime scene and exposed a town where eighty-two cars had been pulled from the water by March...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[They Hid Her in the Trunk - How Power Sank Willow Springs<br /><br />A woman found shot and bludgeoned in the trunk of a Cadillac changed a suburban canal into a crime scene and exposed a town where eighty-two cars had been pulled from the water by March 1982. Who arranged the stopped clocks and why did the machinery of local power move in the same direction to bury her?<br /><br />In this episode, you will hear the timeline of Diane Masters’s disappearance and death, the people connected to her final night, and the official steps that followed; did the protections she relied on actually shield the town instead of her?<br /><br />Person: Diane Masters<br />Date: March 19, 1982<br />Location: Willow Springs, Illinois<br />Person: Alan Masters<br />Person: Michael Corbett<br /><br />- The Cadillac license plate was DGM-19 and the car was recovered from the sanitary canal with keys in the ignition and the engine running.<br />- Diane Masters’s wristwatch and the car dashboard clock were both stopped at exactly 1:50.<br />- Investigators pulled eighty-two vehicles from the canal the night they recovered the Cadillac.<br />- Diane, age 39, had been struck twice in the skull and then shot twice in the left cheekbone with a .22-caliber firearm.<br />- Alan Masters collected two insurance checks of $50,000 each from a $100,000 policy tied to travel to or from an official board meeting.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1793</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Boy Under the Tarp: The Photo No One Took, The Threat He Made</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-boy-under-the-tarp-the-photo-no-one-took-the-threat-he-made--72879044</link><description><![CDATA[The Boy Under the Tarp: The Photo No One Took, The Threat He Made<br /><br />A woman has carried a single impossible image for more than forty years: a boy's face looking up from under a tarp in the back seat of a car, and a man who threatened to "bury you just like him." That man, born Leigh Anthony Bridgart and now known as James Ryan O'Neill, became Tasmania's longest-serving prisoner for a single crime - but the child in that memory was never identified. Who was the boy by the Johanna River, and why was no body ever found?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the events recorded in memory, police files, and station records to trace O'Neill's movements from Melbourne to Coober Pedy, through Adelaide, and on to Fitzroy Crossing, and we ask whether the pattern of violence and official responses can explain the missing child at Johanna River.<br /><br />Person: James Ryan O'Neill (born Leigh Anthony Bridgart)<br />Date: 1962 (child's sighting); 1971 (charges); 1973-1974 (moves and incidents)<br />Location: Johanna River, Cape Otway, Victoria; Fitzroy Crossing, Kimberley, Western Australia; Adelaide, South Australia<br />Charges: Twelve counts of kidnapping and sexual assault (four victims) in 1971<br />Event: Young Aboriginal boy found tied to a log with barbed wire near Fitzroy Crossing, November 1973<br /><br />- A six-year-old girl first saw Leigh's father beating him with a stick during childhood visits.<br />- The child who lifted the tarp was approximately six in 1962 when she saw the boy's face in the back seat.<br />- O'Neill made about fifteen trips between Melbourne and Coober Pedy between 1965 and 1967, wearing out seven or eight cars.<br />- In 1971 O'Neill was charged with twelve counts involving four victims and released on bail before disappearing across jurisdictions.<br />- A boy was found dead tied to a log with barbed wire near Fitzroy Crossing in November 1973 while O'Neill was in the area.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879044</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:56 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879044/0571.mp3" length="21571555" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Boy Under the Tarp: The Photo No One Took, The Threat He Made&#13;
&#13;
A woman has carried a single impossible image for more than forty years: a boy's face looking up from under a tarp in the back seat of a car, and a man who threatened to "bury you...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Boy Under the Tarp: The Photo No One Took, The Threat He Made<br /><br />A woman has carried a single impossible image for more than forty years: a boy's face looking up from under a tarp in the back seat of a car, and a man who threatened to "bury you just like him." That man, born Leigh Anthony Bridgart and now known as James Ryan O'Neill, became Tasmania's longest-serving prisoner for a single crime - but the child in that memory was never identified. Who was the boy by the Johanna River, and why was no body ever found?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the events recorded in memory, police files, and station records to trace O'Neill's movements from Melbourne to Coober Pedy, through Adelaide, and on to Fitzroy Crossing, and we ask whether the pattern of violence and official responses can explain the missing child at Johanna River.<br /><br />Person: James Ryan O'Neill (born Leigh Anthony Bridgart)<br />Date: 1962 (child's sighting); 1971 (charges); 1973-1974 (moves and incidents)<br />Location: Johanna River, Cape Otway, Victoria; Fitzroy Crossing, Kimberley, Western Australia; Adelaide, South Australia<br />Charges: Twelve counts of kidnapping and sexual assault (four victims) in 1971<br />Event: Young Aboriginal boy found tied to a log with barbed wire near Fitzroy Crossing, November 1973<br /><br />- A six-year-old girl first saw Leigh's father beating him with a stick during childhood visits.<br />- The child who lifted the tarp was approximately six in 1962 when she saw the boy's face in the back seat.<br />- O'Neill made about fifteen trips between Melbourne and Coober Pedy between 1965 and 1967, wearing out seven or eight cars.<br />- In 1971 O'Neill was charged with twelve counts involving four victims and released on bail before disappearing across jurisdictions.<br />- A boy was found dead tied to a log with barbed wire near Fitzroy Crossing in November 1973 while O'Neill was in the area.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1349</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Knew Where She Was: The Quiet Man, The Packed Suitcase</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-knew-where-she-was-the-quiet-man-the-packed-suitcase--72879043</link><description><![CDATA[He Knew Where She Was: The Quiet Man, The Packed Suitcase<br /><br />A packed suitcase was found in an unlocked car with keys inside on a Hamilton street while the owner, Carmen Thomas, had not been seen for almost two weeks - her phone never pinged in Hamilton and detectives found blood spatter and cleaned areas in her Auckland flat. Who arranged the scene to look like a voluntary departure, and why was a cash envelope in the glove box linked by handwriting analysis to the man who reported her missing?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline of events from the supermarket CCTV to the Hamilton car and the forensic findings in Carmen's flat, following the investigative choices and the questions that remained: what did the unknown residue hide, and who moved through the flat after Carmen was dead?<br /><br />Person: Carmen Thomas<br />Person: Brad Callahan<br />Location: Auckland flat; Hamilton street (car found)<br />Distance: approximately 130 kilometres between Auckland and Hamilton<br />Investigator: Detective Inspector Mark Benefield<br /><br />- Carmen was 30 years old and shared custody of her young son with Brad Callahan.<br />- The last confirmed image of Carmen shows her at a supermarket with her son on a Tuesday afternoon.<br />- Twelve days after that supermarket footage, Callahan reported Carmen missing.<br />- A Hamilton resident found Carmen’s car unlocked with keys inside and a packed suitcase in the back.<br />- Handwriting analysis by Gordon Schaaf strongly supported that a cash envelope addressed to "Misty" in the glove box was written by Brad Callahan.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879043</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879043/0570.mp3" length="26801478" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Knew Where She Was: The Quiet Man, The Packed Suitcase&#13;
&#13;
A packed suitcase was found in an unlocked car with keys inside on a Hamilton street while the owner, Carmen Thomas, had not been seen for almost two weeks - her phone never pinged in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Knew Where She Was: The Quiet Man, The Packed Suitcase<br /><br />A packed suitcase was found in an unlocked car with keys inside on a Hamilton street while the owner, Carmen Thomas, had not been seen for almost two weeks - her phone never pinged in Hamilton and detectives found blood spatter and cleaned areas in her Auckland flat. Who arranged the scene to look like a voluntary departure, and why was a cash envelope in the glove box linked by handwriting analysis to the man who reported her missing?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline of events from the supermarket CCTV to the Hamilton car and the forensic findings in Carmen's flat, following the investigative choices and the questions that remained: what did the unknown residue hide, and who moved through the flat after Carmen was dead?<br /><br />Person: Carmen Thomas<br />Person: Brad Callahan<br />Location: Auckland flat; Hamilton street (car found)<br />Distance: approximately 130 kilometres between Auckland and Hamilton<br />Investigator: Detective Inspector Mark Benefield<br /><br />- Carmen was 30 years old and shared custody of her young son with Brad Callahan.<br />- The last confirmed image of Carmen shows her at a supermarket with her son on a Tuesday afternoon.<br />- Twelve days after that supermarket footage, Callahan reported Carmen missing.<br />- A Hamilton resident found Carmen’s car unlocked with keys inside and a packed suitcase in the back.<br />- Handwriting analysis by Gordon Schaaf strongly supported that a cash envelope addressed to "Misty" in the glove box was written by Brad Callahan.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1676</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The License That Should've Stopped Them - 2 Agents Dead</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-license-that-should-ve-stopped-them-2-agents-dead--72879042</link><description><![CDATA[The License That Should've Stopped Them - 2 Agents Dead<br /><br />A single driver's license, still sitting unprocessed in a DMV queue, might have prevented the deadliest gunfight in FBI history. Eight agents walked into a residential Miami neighborhood on April 11, 1986; 143 rounds were fired, two agents were killed, and the suspects had already escalated from smoke-grenade restaurant robberies to murders-so how did a photo sit unread while the body count rose?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the October 8, 1985 Steak 'n Ale robbery through the April 11, 1986 shootout, tracing how ballistic matches, eyewitnesses, and a missing-persons case converged - and how one delayed license photo created the gap that cost lives. What exactly was in that DMV queue, and who would have been identified if it had been processed sooner?<br /><br />Person: Emilio Briales<br />Date: April 11, 1986<br />Location: South Dixie Highway, Miami<br />Event: Deadliest single gunfight in FBI history<br />Case: Multiple robberies and murders beginning October 8, 1985<br /><br />- October 8, 1985 Steak 'n Ale robbery yielded $2,800 and a military-grade smoke grenade.<br />- Eight days later a Winn-Dixie robbery left a courier dead and no money taken.<br />- November 8, 1985 saw two robberies in one day: $10,000 taken from a guard and $41,000 from Professional Savings Bank.<br />- January 1986 Barnett Bank robbery resulted in a guard shot three times and $54,000 stolen.<br />- April 11, 1986 shootout involved 143 rounds fired by two men against eight FBI agents, killing two agents.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879042</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:49 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879042/0569.mp3" length="27174298" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The License That Should've Stopped Them - 2 Agents Dead&#13;
&#13;
A single driver's license, still sitting unprocessed in a DMV queue, might have prevented the deadliest gunfight in FBI history. Eight agents walked into a residential Miami neighborhood on...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The License That Should've Stopped Them - 2 Agents Dead<br /><br />A single driver's license, still sitting unprocessed in a DMV queue, might have prevented the deadliest gunfight in FBI history. Eight agents walked into a residential Miami neighborhood on April 11, 1986; 143 rounds were fired, two agents were killed, and the suspects had already escalated from smoke-grenade restaurant robberies to murders-so how did a photo sit unread while the body count rose?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the timeline from the October 8, 1985 Steak 'n Ale robbery through the April 11, 1986 shootout, tracing how ballistic matches, eyewitnesses, and a missing-persons case converged - and how one delayed license photo created the gap that cost lives. What exactly was in that DMV queue, and who would have been identified if it had been processed sooner?<br /><br />Person: Emilio Briales<br />Date: April 11, 1986<br />Location: South Dixie Highway, Miami<br />Event: Deadliest single gunfight in FBI history<br />Case: Multiple robberies and murders beginning October 8, 1985<br /><br />- October 8, 1985 Steak 'n Ale robbery yielded $2,800 and a military-grade smoke grenade.<br />- Eight days later a Winn-Dixie robbery left a courier dead and no money taken.<br />- November 8, 1985 saw two robberies in one day: $10,000 taken from a guard and $41,000 from Professional Savings Bank.<br />- January 1986 Barnett Bank robbery resulted in a guard shot three times and $54,000 stolen.<br />- April 11, 1986 shootout involved 143 rounds fired by two men against eight FBI agents, killing two agents.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1699</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Garage, the Pink Wool, and the Cable Ties That Didn't Bind</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-garage-the-pink-wool-and-the-cable-ties-that-didn-t-bind--72879041</link><description><![CDATA[The Garage, the Pink Wool, and the Cable Ties That Didn't Bind<br /><br />A white Toyota Corolla carried a body more than 300 kilometres, a shopping bag lined with seventeen pink wool fibres sat in the boot, and every cable tie on the victim had been applied after death - so why bind a corpse? What the fibres, the tape, and the post-mortem ties reveal about motive and method is the question this episode pursues.<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from Wellington to New Plymouth, describing the scene in the garage, the forensic findings, and the links between the people who were with the victim in his final hours, closing on the central unresolved question: who decided to move and stage the body, and why?<br /><br />Person: Dean Brown<br />Location: Drake Street garage, New Plymouth<br />Distance moved: more than 300 kilometres<br />Fibres found: 17 pink wool fibres in a shopping bag<br />Time before discovery: at least two days<br /><br />- Victim was over six feet tall and in his twenties, found lying on bedding with head taped and hands and ankles bound behind his back.<br />- Every cable tie on the body was applied post-mortem, according to the pathologist.<br />- One cable tie matched Karl Nuku's DNA with a probability of one in ninety billion.<br />- Blood was detected on every single stair edge by luminol, consistent with carrying a large object down the staircase.<br />- The shopping bag in the Corolla contained cleaning cloths, bleach, gloves, and was lined with seventeen pink wool fibres.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879041</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:45 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879041/0568.mp3" length="28979882" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Garage, the Pink Wool, and the Cable Ties That Didn't Bind&#13;
&#13;
A white Toyota Corolla carried a body more than 300 kilometres, a shopping bag lined with seventeen pink wool fibres sat in the boot, and every cable tie on the victim had been applied...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Garage, the Pink Wool, and the Cable Ties That Didn't Bind<br /><br />A white Toyota Corolla carried a body more than 300 kilometres, a shopping bag lined with seventeen pink wool fibres sat in the boot, and every cable tie on the victim had been applied after death - so why bind a corpse? What the fibres, the tape, and the post-mortem ties reveal about motive and method is the question this episode pursues.<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the timeline from Wellington to New Plymouth, describing the scene in the garage, the forensic findings, and the links between the people who were with the victim in his final hours, closing on the central unresolved question: who decided to move and stage the body, and why?<br /><br />Person: Dean Brown<br />Location: Drake Street garage, New Plymouth<br />Distance moved: more than 300 kilometres<br />Fibres found: 17 pink wool fibres in a shopping bag<br />Time before discovery: at least two days<br /><br />- Victim was over six feet tall and in his twenties, found lying on bedding with head taped and hands and ankles bound behind his back.<br />- Every cable tie on the body was applied post-mortem, according to the pathologist.<br />- One cable tie matched Karl Nuku's DNA with a probability of one in ninety billion.<br />- Blood was detected on every single stair edge by luminol, consistent with carrying a large object down the staircase.<br />- The shopping bag in the Corolla contained cleaning cloths, bleach, gloves, and was lined with seventeen pink wool fibres.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1812</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Wore Praise Like a Mask - The Writer Who Strangled Again</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-wore-praise-like-a-mask-the-writer-who-strangled-again--72879040</link><description><![CDATA[He Wore Praise Like a Mask - The Writer Who Strangled Again<br /><br />The country's most celebrated rehabilitation story hid a lethal pattern: after fifteen years behind bars he walked free and within months women in Prague and Austria were found strangled with their own stockings. He kept hotel and restaurant receipts that later placed him at the scenes, and hours after a Graz jury convicted him of nine murders he strangled himself with a cord torn from his prison uniform - was that final act control or confession?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the arc from celebrated author to suspected serial killer, tracing the cases, the public rehabilitation, and the trail of physical evidence that linked the deaths. What did the receipts, fibers, and knotting patterns reveal about who he really was?<br /><br />Person: Johan Jack Unterweger<br />Date of release: May 12, 1990<br />Sentence served: 15 years for 1974 murder<br />First post-release disappearance: September 14, 1990<br />Conviction and death: June 28, 1994 (convicted), died hours later in his cell<br /><br />- He strangled the 1974 victim with her undergarment and served 15 years before release.<br />- Blanca Bova was last seen September 14, 1990, and found on the Vltava River bank naked and strangled with her nylon stockings.<br />- Heidamarie Hammerer disappeared December 5, 1990, and was found December 31, 1990, roughly ten miles from her last seen location.<br />- The pantyhose on Hammerer was knotted with one leg doubled back and woven as a third braided segment.<br />- After conviction by a Graz jury for nine murders on June 28, 1994, he strangled himself with a cord stripped from his prison uniform hours later.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879040</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:40 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879040/0567.mp3" length="29649452" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Wore Praise Like a Mask - The Writer Who Strangled Again&#13;
&#13;
The country's most celebrated rehabilitation story hid a lethal pattern: after fifteen years behind bars he walked free and within months women in Prague and Austria were found strangled...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Wore Praise Like a Mask - The Writer Who Strangled Again<br /><br />The country's most celebrated rehabilitation story hid a lethal pattern: after fifteen years behind bars he walked free and within months women in Prague and Austria were found strangled with their own stockings. He kept hotel and restaurant receipts that later placed him at the scenes, and hours after a Graz jury convicted him of nine murders he strangled himself with a cord torn from his prison uniform - was that final act control or confession?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the arc from celebrated author to suspected serial killer, tracing the cases, the public rehabilitation, and the trail of physical evidence that linked the deaths. What did the receipts, fibers, and knotting patterns reveal about who he really was?<br /><br />Person: Johan Jack Unterweger<br />Date of release: May 12, 1990<br />Sentence served: 15 years for 1974 murder<br />First post-release disappearance: September 14, 1990<br />Conviction and death: June 28, 1994 (convicted), died hours later in his cell<br /><br />- He strangled the 1974 victim with her undergarment and served 15 years before release.<br />- Blanca Bova was last seen September 14, 1990, and found on the Vltava River bank naked and strangled with her nylon stockings.<br />- Heidamarie Hammerer disappeared December 5, 1990, and was found December 31, 1990, roughly ten miles from her last seen location.<br />- The pantyhose on Hammerer was knotted with one leg doubled back and woven as a third braided segment.<br />- After conviction by a Graz jury for nine murders on June 28, 1994, he strangled himself with a cord stripped from his prison uniform hours later.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1854</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Knew Things No One Could-The Fingerprint in Blood</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-knew-things-no-one-could-the-fingerprint-in-blood--72879039</link><description><![CDATA[He Knew Things No One Could-The Fingerprint in Blood<br /><br />A single fingerprint pressed in blood into a door handle linked a man to a bedroom where a young woman lay dead by morning, but he insisted he had been asleep; how did he know precise wounds before the postmortem, and why was his fingerprint the only physical trace? The detail that haunted the case was a print in blood that could only be left by someone who had been there.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the night Alicia McCallion returned home to the morning her mother found her, focusing on the phone records, prescription count, online traces, and statements that shaped the investigation and raised the central question: who entered the unlocked unit and left without being seen?<br /><br />Person: Alicia McCallion<br />Age: 23<br />Location: New Zealand<br />Person: Carl John Eddie<br />Prescription: Zopiclone, 30 pills<br /><br />- Alicia was found dead the morning after she arrived home; the wound across her throat was described by the pathologist as large, deep, and full-width.<br />- Alicia had ended a two-year relationship with Carl John Eddie, who was 39 and had moved out 14 days before her death.<br />- Millie, Alicia’s mother, discovered folded overalls by the bedroom door and blood smudges on the wall before finding Alicia cold on the floor.<br />- Eddie told family members before the postmortem that Alicia had her throat cut and had been stabbed in the body-details not publicly known until the pathologist’s report.<br />- Eddie’s prescription bottle contained all 30 Zopiclone pills issued one week earlier, while calls from his phone were recorded during the hours he claimed to be asleep.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879039</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:36 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879039/0566.mp3" length="25532136" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Knew Things No One Could-The Fingerprint in Blood&#13;
&#13;
A single fingerprint pressed in blood into a door handle linked a man to a bedroom where a young woman lay dead by morning, but he insisted he had been asleep; how did he know precise wounds...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Knew Things No One Could-The Fingerprint in Blood<br /><br />A single fingerprint pressed in blood into a door handle linked a man to a bedroom where a young woman lay dead by morning, but he insisted he had been asleep; how did he know precise wounds before the postmortem, and why was his fingerprint the only physical trace? The detail that haunted the case was a print in blood that could only be left by someone who had been there.<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the night Alicia McCallion returned home to the morning her mother found her, focusing on the phone records, prescription count, online traces, and statements that shaped the investigation and raised the central question: who entered the unlocked unit and left without being seen?<br /><br />Person: Alicia McCallion<br />Age: 23<br />Location: New Zealand<br />Person: Carl John Eddie<br />Prescription: Zopiclone, 30 pills<br /><br />- Alicia was found dead the morning after she arrived home; the wound across her throat was described by the pathologist as large, deep, and full-width.<br />- Alicia had ended a two-year relationship with Carl John Eddie, who was 39 and had moved out 14 days before her death.<br />- Millie, Alicia’s mother, discovered folded overalls by the bedroom door and blood smudges on the wall before finding Alicia cold on the floor.<br />- Eddie told family members before the postmortem that Alicia had her throat cut and had been stabbed in the body-details not publicly known until the pathologist’s report.<br />- Eddie’s prescription bottle contained all 30 Zopiclone pills issued one week earlier, while calls from his phone were recorded during the hours he claimed to be asleep.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1596</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>When the Choir Left the Park: The Liberty Park Sniper Revealed</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/when-the-choir-left-the-park-the-liberty-park-sniper-revealed--72879038</link><description><![CDATA[When the Choir Left the Park: The Liberty Park Sniper Revealed<br /><br />A warm August evening turned lethal in Salt Lake City when two college dates and their friends left choir practice and walked into a hidden rifle's aim-six casings, a prone shooter in the bushes, and a rifle that was never recovered. Who watched the park for hours and why did two of the four get shot while one walked away untouched?<br /><br />In this episode, you’ll hear the sequence of events that night, the immediate police response, and the months-long ballistics search that tested 150 firearms without finding the murder weapon, asking whether the decision to walk instead of jog was the only thing that separated life from death.<br /><br />Person: Ted Fields<br />Person: Karma Ingersoll<br />Person: David Martin<br />Person: Terry Elrod<br />Date: August 20, 1980<br /><br />- Four young people left choir practice and chose to walk through Liberty Park that evening.<br />- Six brass casings were recovered in a loose cluster near the tree line across from the walking path.<br />- David Martin was shot three times and died hours later at the hospital.<br />- Ted Fields was killed at the scene; Karma Ingersoll was uninjured.<br />- Investigators tested 150 firearms matching the Marlin and Glenfield .30-30 description and found no match.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879038</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879038/0565.mp3" length="28540606" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>When the Choir Left the Park: The Liberty Park Sniper Revealed&#13;
&#13;
A warm August evening turned lethal in Salt Lake City when two college dates and their friends left choir practice and walked into a hidden rifle's aim-six casings, a prone shooter in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[When the Choir Left the Park: The Liberty Park Sniper Revealed<br /><br />A warm August evening turned lethal in Salt Lake City when two college dates and their friends left choir practice and walked into a hidden rifle's aim-six casings, a prone shooter in the bushes, and a rifle that was never recovered. Who watched the park for hours and why did two of the four get shot while one walked away untouched?<br /><br />In this episode, you’ll hear the sequence of events that night, the immediate police response, and the months-long ballistics search that tested 150 firearms without finding the murder weapon, asking whether the decision to walk instead of jog was the only thing that separated life from death.<br /><br />Person: Ted Fields<br />Person: Karma Ingersoll<br />Person: David Martin<br />Person: Terry Elrod<br />Date: August 20, 1980<br /><br />- Four young people left choir practice and chose to walk through Liberty Park that evening.<br />- Six brass casings were recovered in a loose cluster near the tree line across from the walking path.<br />- David Martin was shot three times and died hours later at the hospital.<br />- Ted Fields was killed at the scene; Karma Ingersoll was uninjured.<br />- Investigators tested 150 firearms matching the Marlin and Glenfield .30-30 description and found no match.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1784</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>She Said "Test Drive" - Found Dead, Key Hidden Under Car</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/she-said-test-drive-found-dead-key-hidden-under-car--72879036</link><description><![CDATA[She Said "Test Drive" - Found Dead, Key Hidden Under Car<br /><br />A young woman vanished after texting her mother about a man who wanted a test drive; eleven days later her body was found half a kilometer from the nearest road, hidden under crossed branches and dirt. Her burned red Mazda was found with the ignition key underneath the vehicle, and the only immediate identifier on her was a tattoo - so who left the key and why was the car torched?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the last messages Emma Agnew sent through the police response, the forensic work on the burned Mazda, and the search that ended in Bottle Lake Forest. We follow how urgent decisions about cell-data and rapid evidence collection kept the case from going cold and raise the question of what unfolded between the test drive arrangement and the car fire.<br /><br />Person: Emma Agnew<br />Age: 20<br />Location: Christchurch, New Zealand<br />Event: Car found burning at Bromley Park<br />Discovery: Body found in Bottle Lake Forest<br /><br />- Last message to her mother sent at about 10:30 a.m. mentioning a man who wanted a test drive<br />- Final email sent at 9:53 a.m. the same morning she disappeared<br />- Red Mazda found burning the same night with ignition key located underneath the vehicle<br />- More than 30 forensic samples collected from the car, including tape lifts and swabs<br />- Body found 11 days later, approximately 500 meters from the nearest road, hidden under crossed branches and a layer of dirt<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879036</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879036/0564.mp3" length="27068136" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>She Said "Test Drive" - Found Dead, Key Hidden Under Car&#13;
&#13;
A young woman vanished after texting her mother about a man who wanted a test drive; eleven days later her body was found half a kilometer from the nearest road, hidden under crossed branches...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[She Said "Test Drive" - Found Dead, Key Hidden Under Car<br /><br />A young woman vanished after texting her mother about a man who wanted a test drive; eleven days later her body was found half a kilometer from the nearest road, hidden under crossed branches and dirt. Her burned red Mazda was found with the ignition key underneath the vehicle, and the only immediate identifier on her was a tattoo - so who left the key and why was the car torched?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell the sequence of events from the last messages Emma Agnew sent through the police response, the forensic work on the burned Mazda, and the search that ended in Bottle Lake Forest. We follow how urgent decisions about cell-data and rapid evidence collection kept the case from going cold and raise the question of what unfolded between the test drive arrangement and the car fire.<br /><br />Person: Emma Agnew<br />Age: 20<br />Location: Christchurch, New Zealand<br />Event: Car found burning at Bromley Park<br />Discovery: Body found in Bottle Lake Forest<br /><br />- Last message to her mother sent at about 10:30 a.m. mentioning a man who wanted a test drive<br />- Final email sent at 9:53 a.m. the same morning she disappeared<br />- Red Mazda found burning the same night with ignition key located underneath the vehicle<br />- More than 30 forensic samples collected from the car, including tape lifts and swabs<br />- Body found 11 days later, approximately 500 meters from the nearest road, hidden under crossed branches and a layer of dirt<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1692</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Anchored Rolex: How a Watch Exposed a Fake Identity Killer</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-anchored-rolex-how-a-watch-exposed-a-fake-identity-killer--72879035</link><description><![CDATA[The Anchored Rolex: How a Watch Exposed a Fake Identity Killer<br /><br />A dead man found six miles off Brixham with an anchor threaded to his shin and a Rolex still ticking led police to a deception that spanned continents. The watch stopped exactly 48 hours after immersion, pinning the time he entered the water and pointing investigators toward a stolen life - but who was the man beneath the anchor?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of discoveries from the fishing trawler haul at dawn to the forensic detail that revealed timing, identity theft, and betrayal across England and Canada. Listen to how a waterproof Rolex, a maple-leaf tattoo, and zinc traces on a belt answer the question: how did one watch unravel a carefully constructed false identity?<br /><br />Person: Ronald Joseph Platt<br />Date found: 22 July 1996<br />Location found: Roughs, six miles from Brixham Harbor, English Channel<br />Observed tattoo: maple leaf above right knuckle<br />Implied immersion date: 20 or 21 July 1996<br /><br />- The body was hauled up at five in the morning from a fishing trawler working the Roughs.<br />- The Rolex on the wrist ran for roughly 48 hours in still water and stopped on 22 July 1996.<br />- The anchor was draped across the shin and matched two distinct marks pressed into the skin.<br />- Trace deposits of zinc on the dead man's leather belt corresponded precisely to the anchor's zinc coating.<br />- Ronald Joseph Platt left for Canada in February 1993 and returned to England in 1995, while his name was used by Albert Walker for nearly four years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879035</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:26 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879035/0563.mp3" length="27403757" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Anchored Rolex: How a Watch Exposed a Fake Identity Killer&#13;
&#13;
A dead man found six miles off Brixham with an anchor threaded to his shin and a Rolex still ticking led police to a deception that spanned continents. The watch stopped exactly 48...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Anchored Rolex: How a Watch Exposed a Fake Identity Killer<br /><br />A dead man found six miles off Brixham with an anchor threaded to his shin and a Rolex still ticking led police to a deception that spanned continents. The watch stopped exactly 48 hours after immersion, pinning the time he entered the water and pointing investigators toward a stolen life - but who was the man beneath the anchor?<br /><br />In this episode, we follow the sequence of discoveries from the fishing trawler haul at dawn to the forensic detail that revealed timing, identity theft, and betrayal across England and Canada. Listen to how a waterproof Rolex, a maple-leaf tattoo, and zinc traces on a belt answer the question: how did one watch unravel a carefully constructed false identity?<br /><br />Person: Ronald Joseph Platt<br />Date found: 22 July 1996<br />Location found: Roughs, six miles from Brixham Harbor, English Channel<br />Observed tattoo: maple leaf above right knuckle<br />Implied immersion date: 20 or 21 July 1996<br /><br />- The body was hauled up at five in the morning from a fishing trawler working the Roughs.<br />- The Rolex on the wrist ran for roughly 48 hours in still water and stopped on 22 July 1996.<br />- The anchor was draped across the shin and matched two distinct marks pressed into the skin.<br />- Trace deposits of zinc on the dead man's leather belt corresponded precisely to the anchor's zinc coating.<br />- Ronald Joseph Platt left for Canada in February 1993 and returned to England in 1995, while his name was used by Albert Walker for nearly four years.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1713</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>He Killed Without Motive: The Night Buffalo's Streets Went Silent</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/he-killed-without-motive-the-night-buffalo-s-streets-went-silent--72879034</link><description><![CDATA[He Killed Without Motive: The Night Buffalo's Streets Went Silent<br /><br />The city held its breath after a 14-year-old was shot three times in the head in a supermarket parking lot at 9:45 PM on a warm September night of 1980, dead before anyone knew why; within weeks three more Black men were shot across Buffalo and Niagara Falls with .22 slugs, and then the violence stopped as abruptly as it began. What connected those shootings, the two cab drivers found with their chests cut open and hearts removed, and a man caught strangling a patient in a hospital ward - if anything at all?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how Buffalo’s fall of 1980 became a string of baffling crimes: four Black men shot with .22-caliber bullets at close range, two cab drivers mutilated after death, and an interrupted hospital strangling, culminating in a suspect who later surfaced while stationed at Fort Benning, Georgia. How did investigators piece together these scattered scenes, and what unanswered questions remained?<br /><br />Person: Glenn Dunn<br />Date: September 22, 1980<br />Location: East Delavan Avenue parking lot, Buffalo<br />Weapon: .22 caliber Ruger (slugs recovered by Erie County Medical Examiner)<br />Case: Four shooting victims plus two cab driver homicides and a hospital strangling<br /><br />- Victim age: Glenn Dunn was fourteen years old when shot three times in the head at 9:45 PM.<br />- Timeline: Four Black men were shot in the Buffalo area over three weeks starting September 22, 1980.<br />- Ballistics: Erie County Medical Examiner recovered .22-caliber slugs fired at close range with powder burns on at least one victim.<br />- Cab driver murders: Ernest Jones (41) found October 9 with throat slashed and heart removed; Parlor W. Edwards (71) found six days earlier bludgeoned with chest cut open and heart missing.<br />- Suspect detail: FBI profiler John Douglas described a likely white male about 25-28, asocial, weapon-fixated, possibly with military service; a 25-year-old Army private from Buffalo shipped out to Fort Benning as the attacks paused.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879034</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879034/0562.mp3" length="28128917" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>He Killed Without Motive: The Night Buffalo's Streets Went Silent&#13;
&#13;
The city held its breath after a 14-year-old was shot three times in the head in a supermarket parking lot at 9:45 PM on a warm September night of 1980, dead before anyone knew why;...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[He Killed Without Motive: The Night Buffalo's Streets Went Silent<br /><br />The city held its breath after a 14-year-old was shot three times in the head in a supermarket parking lot at 9:45 PM on a warm September night of 1980, dead before anyone knew why; within weeks three more Black men were shot across Buffalo and Niagara Falls with .22 slugs, and then the violence stopped as abruptly as it began. What connected those shootings, the two cab drivers found with their chests cut open and hearts removed, and a man caught strangling a patient in a hospital ward - if anything at all?<br /><br />In this episode, we tell how Buffalo’s fall of 1980 became a string of baffling crimes: four Black men shot with .22-caliber bullets at close range, two cab drivers mutilated after death, and an interrupted hospital strangling, culminating in a suspect who later surfaced while stationed at Fort Benning, Georgia. How did investigators piece together these scattered scenes, and what unanswered questions remained?<br /><br />Person: Glenn Dunn<br />Date: September 22, 1980<br />Location: East Delavan Avenue parking lot, Buffalo<br />Weapon: .22 caliber Ruger (slugs recovered by Erie County Medical Examiner)<br />Case: Four shooting victims plus two cab driver homicides and a hospital strangling<br /><br />- Victim age: Glenn Dunn was fourteen years old when shot three times in the head at 9:45 PM.<br />- Timeline: Four Black men were shot in the Buffalo area over three weeks starting September 22, 1980.<br />- Ballistics: Erie County Medical Examiner recovered .22-caliber slugs fired at close range with powder burns on at least one victim.<br />- Cab driver murders: Ernest Jones (41) found October 9 with throat slashed and heart removed; Parlor W. Edwards (71) found six days earlier bludgeoned with chest cut open and heart missing.<br />- Suspect detail: FBI profiler John Douglas described a likely white male about 25-28, asocial, weapon-fixated, possibly with military service; a 25-year-old Army private from Buffalo shipped out to Fort Benning as the attacks paused.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1758</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Man Who Asked for Tea - Hands Missing at Red Rocks</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-man-who-asked-for-tea-hands-missing-at-red-rocks--72879032</link><description><![CDATA[The Man Who Asked for Tea - Hands Missing at Red Rocks<br /><br />A routine question about tea was the last thing Tony Stanlake ever typed before his phone went silent and his hands disappeared from his body on a windswept beach. The corpse was found with ankles bound, head nearly severed, and both hands removed at the wrists - but why was there red spray paint on a garage floor and fresh twenty-dollar bills spent by a man who had just been with the victim?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of messages, purchases, and forensic details that link Tony Stanlake to a commercial cannabis grow and to Daniel Moore, including the last texts and the tools bought that morning. What happened in the garage between seven and the tide taking a body is the question that carries the case.<br /><br />Person: Tony Stanlake<br />Person: Daniel Moore<br />Location: Red Rocks Beach, southern coast of Wellington<br />Age: 62<br />Object: red spray paint found on garage floor<br /><br />- Tony Stanlake’s last text asked, “Shall I put the kettle on?” and his final reply was “Yes, please.”<br />- Tony’s body was found partially submerged at Red Rocks Beach with ankles bound and both hands removed at the wrists.<br />- Investigators found a garage used as a commercial cannabis grow with recently applied red spray paint that concealed blood beneath it.<br />- Daniel Moore purchased a maul hammer, an axe, a tin of melon, and garden secateurs the morning of the meeting, before texting Tony that he was on his way.<br />- After the night in question, Moore went out and paid for friends’ drinks using twenty-dollar bills similar to those Tony reportedly kept folded in a bedside drawer.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72879032</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:46:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72879032/0561.mp3" length="25816766" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Creator at Obomedia</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Man Who Asked for Tea - Hands Missing at Red Rocks&#13;
&#13;
A routine question about tea was the last thing Tony Stanlake ever typed before his phone went silent and his hands disappeared from his body on a windswept beach. The corpse was found with...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Man Who Asked for Tea - Hands Missing at Red Rocks<br /><br />A routine question about tea was the last thing Tony Stanlake ever typed before his phone went silent and his hands disappeared from his body on a windswept beach. The corpse was found with ankles bound, head nearly severed, and both hands removed at the wrists - but why was there red spray paint on a garage floor and fresh twenty-dollar bills spent by a man who had just been with the victim?<br /><br />In this episode, we lay out the sequence of messages, purchases, and forensic details that link Tony Stanlake to a commercial cannabis grow and to Daniel Moore, including the last texts and the tools bought that morning. What happened in the garage between seven and the tide taking a body is the question that carries the case.<br /><br />Person: Tony Stanlake<br />Person: Daniel Moore<br />Location: Red Rocks Beach, southern coast of Wellington<br />Age: 62<br />Object: red spray paint found on garage floor<br /><br />- Tony Stanlake’s last text asked, “Shall I put the kettle on?” and his final reply was “Yes, please.”<br />- Tony’s body was found partially submerged at Red Rocks Beach with ankles bound and both hands removed at the wrists.<br />- Investigators found a garage used as a commercial cannabis grow with recently applied red spray paint that concealed blood beneath it.<br />- Daniel Moore purchased a maul hammer, an axe, a tin of melon, and garden secateurs the morning of the meeting, before texting Tony that he was on his way.<br />- After the night in question, Moore went out and paid for friends’ drinks using twenty-dollar bills similar to those Tony reportedly kept folded in a bedside drawer.<br /><br />To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.<br /><br />© 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.<br />This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1614</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/19e90200078ebea6db0bec2967880ced.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>
