<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Essay on the Trial by Jury</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/essay-on-the-trial-by-jury--7127508</link><description><![CDATA[Delve into the profound significance of the jury system and its pivotal role in justice as we explore the themes surrounding "Essay on the Trial by Jury." This podcast invites listeners to consider the historical foundations and philosophical implications of jury duty, emphasizing the power of ordinary citizens to impact the legal landscape. Each episode features a new complete audiobook that examines the evolution of juries, their rights, and their responsibilities in adjudicating not just facts but the very essence of justice itself. This is not a single story but a series of unique explorations that illuminate the relationship between law and morality, challenging listeners to reflect on what constitutes just governance. As you engage with these thought-provoking narratives, you will discover a new book with every episode, enriching your understanding of the legal principles that shape our society. Join us in this enlightening journey through the annals of justice and civic duty.<br /><br />This show includes AI-generated content.]]></description><atom:link href="https://www.spreaker.com/show/7127508/episodes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language>en</language><category>Books</category><copyright>Copyright 1800s Genre</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 15:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:owner><itunes:name>1800s Genre</itunes:name><itunes:email>spreaker76@podcastlibrary.org</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>Delve into the profound significance of the jury system and its pivotal role in justice as we explore the themes surrounding "Essay on the Trial by Jury." This podcast invites listeners to consider the historical foundations and philosophical...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Delve into the profound significance of the jury system and its pivotal role in justice as we explore the themes surrounding "Essay on the Trial by Jury." This podcast invites listeners to consider the historical foundations and philosophical implications of jury duty, emphasizing the power of ordinary citizens to impact the legal landscape. Each episode features a new complete audiobook that examines the evolution of juries, their rights, and their responsibilities in adjudicating not just facts but the very essence of justice itself. This is not a single story but a series of unique explorations that illuminate the relationship between law and morality, challenging listeners to reflect on what constitutes just governance. As you engage with these thought-provoking narratives, you will discover a new book with every episode, enriching your understanding of the legal principles that shape our society. Join us in this enlightening journey through the annals of justice and civic duty.<br /><br />This show includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Arts"><itunes:category text="Books"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="History"/><itunes:category text="Government"/><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><podcast:guid>074dfac1-ca1f-5852-8b1f-d46ca4163450</podcast:guid><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><item><title>Life and Death of King John-William Shakespeare</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/life-and-death-of-king-john-william-shakespeare--74650334</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74650334</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:02:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74650334/life_and_death_of_king_john_william_shakespeare.mp3" length="71419592" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>8918</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>History of Bread From Pre-Historic to Modern Times-John Ashton</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/history-of-bread-from-pre-historic-to-modern-times-john-ashton--74614828</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74614828</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:02:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74614828/history_of_bread_from_pre_historic_to_modern_times_john_ashton.mp3" length="135919437" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>16973</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Short Nonfiction Collection, Vol. 043-Various</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/short-nonfiction-collection-vol-043-various--74582553</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74582553</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:02:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74582553/short_nonfiction_collection_vol_043_various.mp3" length="171147235" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>21372</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Pharsalia; Dramatic Episodes of the Civil Wars-Lucan</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/pharsalia-dramatic-episodes-of-the-civil-wars-lucan--74551395</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74551395</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:02:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74551395/pharsalia_dramatic_episodes_of_the_civil_wars_lucan.mp3" length="270693779" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>33803</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Optimism, An Essay-Helen Keller</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/optimism-an-essay-helen-keller--74518635</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74518635</guid><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 09:07:58 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74518635/optimism_an_essay_helen_keller.mp3" length="29628134" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3700</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Short Nonfiction Collection, Vol. 066-Various</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/short-nonfiction-collection-vol-066-various--74488589</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74488589</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 09:08:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74488589/short_nonfiction_collection_vol_066_various.mp3" length="160334295" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>20022</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Selected Interviews with Robert G. Ingersoll, Volume 2-Robert G. Ingersoll</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/selected-interviews-with-robert-g-ingersoll-volume-2-robert-g-ingersoll--74448096</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74448096</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:07:15 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74448096/selected_interviews_with_robert_g_ingersoll_volume_2_robert_g_ingersoll.mp3" length="192839673" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>24081</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Underground Railroad, Part 2-William Still</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/underground-railroad-part-2-william-still--74414397</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74414397</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:08:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74414397/underground_railroad_part_2_william_still.mp3" length="263047525" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>32848</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Psychology the Cognitive Powers-James McCosh</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/psychology-the-cognitive-powers-james-mccosh--74366679</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74366679</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 09:08:10 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74366679/psychology_the_cognitive_powers_james_mccosh.mp3" length="241218078" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>30122</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lays of Ancient Rome (Version 2)-Thomas Babington Macaulay</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lays-of-ancient-rome-version-2-thomas-babington-macaulay--74327729</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74327729</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:30:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74327729/lays_of_ancient_rome_version_2_thomas_babington_macaulay.mp3" length="76783675" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>9589</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>On Reading The Bible-Sir Arthur Thomas Quiller-Couch</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/on-reading-the-bible-sir-arthur-thomas-quiller-couch--74183697</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74183697</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:08:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74183697/on_reading_the_bible_sir_arthur_thomas_quiller_couch.mp3" length="56510521" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>7057</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Pastiche and Prejudice-Arthur Bingham Walkley</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/pastiche-and-prejudice-arthur-bingham-walkley--74137442</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74137442</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 09:08:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74137442/pastiche_and_prejudice_arthur_bingham_walkley.mp3" length="235074395" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>29355</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Crimes of England-G. K. Chesterton</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/crimes-of-england-g-k-chesterton--74101715</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/74101715</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 09:07:36 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/74101715/crimes_of_england_g_k_chesterton.mp3" length="99906215" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>12476</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Life and Death of King John-William Shakespeare</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/life-and-death-of-king-john-william-shakespeare--73382116</link><description><![CDATA["Life and Death of King John" by William Shakespeare delves into the complexities of power, loyalty, and the human condition through the tumultuous reign of King John of England. This compelling narrative explores themes of legitimacy, the burdens of leadership, and the consequences of betrayal, making it a timeless reflection on authority and governance. The struggles faced by King John resonate with contemporary issues of political strife and the quest for justice, inviting listeners to ponder the nature of sovereignty and the fragility of human relationships.<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73382116</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 11:25:51 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73382116/life_and_death_of_king_john_william_shakespeare.mp3" length="71419592" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>"Life and Death of King John" by William Shakespeare delves into the complexities of power, loyalty, and the human condition through the tumultuous reign of King John of England. This compelling narrative explores themes of legitimacy, the burdens of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA["Life and Death of King John" by William Shakespeare delves into the complexities of power, loyalty, and the human condition through the tumultuous reign of King John of England. This compelling narrative explores themes of legitimacy, the burdens of leadership, and the consequences of betrayal, making it a timeless reflection on authority and governance. The struggles faced by King John resonate with contemporary issues of political strife and the quest for justice, inviting listeners to ponder the nature of sovereignty and the fragility of human relationships.<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>8918</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Essay on the Trial by Jury - Lysander Spooner - Part 2</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/essay-on-the-trial-by-jury-lysander-spooner-part-2--72673190</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72673190</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 09:00:16 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72673190/essay_on_the_trial_by_jury_lysander_spooner_part_2.mp3" length="44093273" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5512</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>carta,duty,essay,judge,jury,magna,political,science,spooner,trial</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Essay on the Trial by Jury - Lysander Spooner - Part 1</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/essay-on-the-trial-by-jury-lysander-spooner-part-1--72673189</link><description><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72673189</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 15:14:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72673189/essay_on_the_trial_by_jury_lysander_spooner_part_1.mp3" length="286549923" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:txt purpose="ai-content">true</podcast:txt><itunes:author>Lysander Spooner</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[FOR more than six hundred years that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.So begins Spooner's epic on the jury, its origins and history. Spooner examines the history and powers of a jury, from the magna carta in King John's time, to the practices in the 18th century. A classic work on law, Spooner argues that the decision of the jury is sovereign over the king's law. (Summary by Bethanne)<br /><br />This episode includes AI-generated content.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>35819</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>carta,duty,essay,judge,jury,magna,political,science,spooner,trial</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/545f83fe3c4fe434356082e657e03be0.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>
