https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/hggs-us-and-them--6741226enScienceCopyright HGGShttps://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/abce39a0fd775983fcfedeb74cf4c1f8.jpghttps://www.spreaker.com/podcast/hggs-us-and-them--6741226Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:27:31 +0000HGGSHGGShggs.heidelberguniversity@gmail.comIn this podcast series, we encourage discussions on various approaches to the theme “Us and Them,” including concepts such as integration, tolerance, mutual understanding. Our podcast invites members of the public, students, PhD candidates,...false470a5853-c4b1-508f-959d-3311e391b6a7episodichttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/relating-to-others-a-neo-platonic-metaphysical-approach-interview-with-pd-dr-max-rohstock-and-anna-maria-lambertz-rohstock-heidelberg--75110722• How can we cultivate an ideal relationship with ourselves and with others?• What can Neoplatonic philosophy teach us about truth, freedom, inner harmony, and human flourishing?• How can philosophical thinking help us navigate existential despair?
In this episode, we explore how philosophical traditions can illuminate our relationships with ourselves and others. PD Dr. Max Rohstock and Anna Maria Lambertz-Rohstock from the Department of Philosophy at Heidelberg University discuss the Neoplatonic tradition, its conception of the absolute, and the idea that philosophical insight can transform how we relate to ourselves and others.
The conversation examines the Platonic understanding of the self as composed of different forms of striving and the importance of bringing them into harmony through truth and wisdom. Our guests explain how absolutizing finite goals such as wealth, power, or recognition can contribute to dissatisfaction and existential despair. They further discuss the concept of absolutizing and the philosophical challenge of relating appropriately to both absolute and relative goals.
The episode also explores negative theology as a method for questioning the ideas and values we treat as absolute. In this context, philosophical thinking is presented as a form of practice that can cultivate self-knowledge, humility, freedom, and resistance to manipulation. The discussion considers how an ideal relationship with oneself may provide the foundation for relating to others with greater openness, empathy, and freedom. Finally, we discuss the initiative “Inspiration Philosophie”, which seeks to make philosophical thinking accessible beyond academia.
Join us as we explore whether philosophy can offer not only ways of understanding reality, but also practical guidance for becoming oneself and relating more meaningfully to others!
Inspiration PhilosophiePhilosophy classes: https://linktr.ee/inspiration_philosophieNewsletter: https://substack.com/@inspirationphilosophyResearch: https://maxrohstock.academia.edu/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/inspiration_philosophie/
Timeline(00:00) Intro(02:34) Academic Backgrounds(07:26) Motivation and the Archimedean Point(13:40) Neoplatonism and the Absolute(22:05) The Ideal Relationship with Oneself(29:34) From Self-Relation to Relations with Others(32:42) Kierkegaard and Absolutizing(38:07) Negative Theology(42:49) The Historical-Systematic Method(45:33) Philosophy as a Way of Life(50:44) Inspiration Philosophie(55:40) Learning from Public Engagement(58:49) Future Projects and Plans(01:02:37) Outro
KeywordsNeoplatonism, Plato, Plotinus, Metaphysics, Ethics, Philosophy, Absolute, Inner Harmony, Self-Realization, Existential Despair, Kierkegaard, Negative Theology, Freedom, Human Flourishing, Philosophical Life, Historical-Systematic Method, Public Philosophy, Inspiration Philosophie, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Scholarly Conversations, Interdisciplinary Discussions, Interviews with Scholars, University Discourse, Us and Them, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Heidelberg University]]>aa82f3f2-c533-41cb-a84d-6330c5a14b78Mon, 14 Sep 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSPD Dr. Max Rohstock and Anna Maria Lambertz-Rohstock (Department of Philosophy, Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) • How can we cultivate an ideal relationship with ourselves and with others?• What can Neoplatonic...• How can we cultivate an ideal relationship with ourselves and with others?• What can Neoplatonic philosophy teach us about truth, freedom, inner harmony, and human flourishing?• How can philosophical thinking help us navigate existential despair?
In this episode, we explore how philosophical traditions can illuminate our relationships with ourselves and others. PD Dr. Max Rohstock and Anna Maria Lambertz-Rohstock from the Department of Philosophy at Heidelberg University discuss the Neoplatonic tradition, its conception of the absolute, and the idea that philosophical insight can transform how we relate to ourselves and others.
The conversation examines the Platonic understanding of the self as composed of different forms of striving and the importance of bringing them into harmony through truth and wisdom. Our guests explain how absolutizing finite goals such as wealth, power, or recognition can contribute to dissatisfaction and existential despair. They further discuss the concept of absolutizing and the philosophical challenge of relating appropriately to both absolute and relative goals.
The episode also explores negative theology as a method for questioning the ideas and values we treat as absolute. In this context, philosophical thinking is presented as a form of practice that can cultivate self-knowledge, humility, freedom, and resistance to manipulation. The discussion considers how an ideal relationship with oneself may provide the foundation for relating to others with greater openness, empathy, and freedom. Finally, we discuss the initiative “Inspiration Philosophie”, which seeks to make philosophical thinking accessible beyond academia.
Join us as we explore whether philosophy can offer not only ways of understanding reality, but also practical guidance for becoming oneself and relating more meaningfully to others!
Inspiration PhilosophiePhilosophy classes: https://linktr.ee/inspiration_philosophieNewsletter: https://substack.com/@inspirationphilosophyResearch: https://maxrohstock.academia.edu/Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/inspiration_philosophie/
Timeline(00:00) Intro(02:34) Academic Backgrounds(07:26) Motivation and the Archimedean Point(13:40) Neoplatonism and the Absolute(22:05) The Ideal Relationship with Oneself(29:34) From Self-Relation to Relations with Others(32:42) Kierkegaard and Absolutizing(38:07) Negative Theology(42:49) The Historical-Systematic Method(45:33) Philosophy as a Way of Life(50:44) Inspiration Philosophie(55:40) Learning from Public Engagement(58:49) Future Projects and Plans(01:02:37) Outro
KeywordsNeoplatonism, Plato, Plotinus, Metaphysics, Ethics, Philosophy, Absolute, Inner Harmony, Self-Realization, Existential Despair, Kierkegaard, Negative Theology, Freedom, Human Flourishing, Philosophical Life, Historical-Systematic Method, Public Philosophy, Inspiration Philosophie, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Scholarly Conversations, Interdisciplinary Discussions, Interviews with Scholars, University Discourse, Us and Them, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Heidelberg University]]>3801falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/energy-transition-socio-spatial-tensions-interview-with-jun-prof-dr-rosa-lehmann-heidelberg-university--73188128b71cdb0a-a4c7-4020-be1c-9a10f6d5868dMon, 27 Jul 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSJun.-Prof. Dr. Rosa Lehmann (Heidelberg Center for Ibero American Studies, Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) In this episode, we explore the often-overlooked dimensions of energy transition projects with Jun.-Prof....2096falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/saving-strangers-the-false-promise-of-responsibility-to-protect-interview-with-prof-dr-richard-caplan-university-of-oxford--729451334a8541ac-4adf-43bb-957a-de93453aeecdMon, 13 Jul 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSProf. Dr. Richard Caplan (University of Oxford) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - How has the understanding of state sovereignty and the role of UN peacekeeping operations evolved over time? - What is the "Dilemma of Humanitarian...2192falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ai-literacy-bridging-the-gap-between-us-and-them-in-the-digital-age-interview-with-alberto-carballo-soca-university-of-havana--72736006- How do global inequalities influence access to and research on artificial intelligence?
- What can policymakers and educators do to promote a more inclusive digital future?
In this episode, we explore the intersections of educational psychology, digital education, and artificial intelligence literacy together with Alberto Carballo Soca from the Faculty of Psychology at the University of Havana, who was also one of the presenters at the HGGS Summer Forum 2025, “Us and Them.” Alberto Carballo Soca discusses how the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion that emerge in school groups can help us understand broader social divisions in the digital age and the growing importance of AI literacy in contemporary societies.
Throughout the episode, we explore how social identities are formed within educational settings and how factors such as skin color,, academic achievement, and personal interests can influence acceptance, rejection, and belonging within groups. Building on these foundations, the discussion turns to the role of education in fostering inclusion and developing the social competencies necessary for participation and cooperation. Alberto Carballo Soca reflects on the importanceof teamwork, empathy, and belonging, arguing that schools play a crucial role in preparing individuals not only for professional life but also for active citizenship in societies. A central focus of the episode is AI literacy, a rapidly emerging field that seeks to equip individuals with the knowledge, skills, and critical awareness necessary to engage responsibly with artificial intelligence technologies. Drawing on his bibliometric research, Alberto Carballo Soca discusses how most AI literacy research is currently concentrated in the Global North, creating significant disparities between the Global North, the Global South, and the “Global Desert.” Finally, the discussion turns to the future of AI literacy and digital education. Alberto Carballo Soca argues that education remains the most important tool for reducing digital inequalities and ensuring that individuals can engage with AI technologies in informed, critical, and responsible ways. Join us in this episode as we explore how educational psychology, digital education, and AI literacy can help bridge the divide between “us” and “them” and contribute to a more inclusive digital future! Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Alberto Carballo Soca and His Academic Background (02:51) From Group Dynamics to AI Literacy: Research Motivation and Academic Journey (07:26) Research Methods for Studying Group Dynamics in Schools (09:18) Individual and Collective Perspectives on Inclusion and Cooperation (12:43) Belonging, Motivation, and Participation in Group Activities (14:52) The Shift Towards Digital Education (20:37) Recommendations for Overcoming Challenges in Digital Education (22:45) Attitudes, Knowledge, and Skills for Using Artificial Intelligence (26:17) The Global North, the Global South, and the Global Desert in AI Literacy (29:34) Policy Recommendations for Improving AI Literacy (31:24) Personal Reflections: Running, Creativity, and Academic Life (32:57) Outro
KeywordsAI Literacy, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Education, Educational Psychology, Group Cohesion, Social Identity Theory, Educational Inclusion, Digital Competence, Large Language Models, Global North, Global South, Global Desert, Educational Policy, Interdisciplinary Research, Bibliometric Analysis, Digital Inequality
Note: This episode is a republished and revised version of one of our previous episodes, with adjustments made to enhance the sound quality and improve the overall flow of the conversation. Thank you very much for your understanding and continued support.]]>ad5ba639-c76e-4a62-917c-fee63fa70aa9Mon, 29 Jun 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSAlberto Carballo Soca (University of Havana) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - How do group dynamics, social identity, and educational inclusion shape our understanding of the “Us and Them” divide? - How do global inequalities influence...- How do global inequalities influence access to and research on artificial intelligence?
- What can policymakers and educators do to promote a more inclusive digital future?
In this episode, we explore the intersections of educational psychology, digital education, and artificial intelligence literacy together with Alberto Carballo Soca from the Faculty of Psychology at the University of Havana, who was also one of the presenters at the HGGS Summer Forum 2025, “Us and Them.” Alberto Carballo Soca discusses how the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion that emerge in school groups can help us understand broader social divisions in the digital age and the growing importance of AI literacy in contemporary societies.
Throughout the episode, we explore how social identities are formed within educational settings and how factors such as skin color,, academic achievement, and personal interests can influence acceptance, rejection, and belonging within groups. Building on these foundations, the discussion turns to the role of education in fostering inclusion and developing the social competencies necessary for participation and cooperation. Alberto Carballo Soca reflects on the importanceof teamwork, empathy, and belonging, arguing that schools play a crucial role in preparing individuals not only for professional life but also for active citizenship in societies. A central focus of the episode is AI literacy, a rapidly emerging field that seeks to equip individuals with the knowledge, skills, and critical awareness necessary to engage responsibly with artificial intelligence technologies. Drawing on his bibliometric research, Alberto Carballo Soca discusses how most AI literacy research is currently concentrated in the Global North, creating significant disparities between the Global North, the Global South, and the “Global Desert.” Finally, the discussion turns to the future of AI literacy and digital education. Alberto Carballo Soca argues that education remains the most important tool for reducing digital inequalities and ensuring that individuals can engage with AI technologies in informed, critical, and responsible ways. Join us in this episode as we explore how educational psychology, digital education, and AI literacy can help bridge the divide between “us” and “them” and contribute to a more inclusive digital future! Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Alberto Carballo Soca and His Academic Background (02:51) From Group Dynamics to AI Literacy: Research Motivation and Academic Journey (07:26) Research Methods for Studying Group Dynamics in Schools (09:18) Individual and Collective Perspectives on Inclusion and Cooperation (12:43) Belonging, Motivation, and Participation in Group Activities (14:52) The Shift Towards Digital Education (20:37) Recommendations for Overcoming Challenges in Digital Education (22:45) Attitudes, Knowledge, and Skills for Using Artificial Intelligence (26:17) The Global North, the Global South, and the Global Desert in AI Literacy (29:34) Policy Recommendations for Improving AI Literacy (31:24) Personal Reflections: Running, Creativity, and Academic Life (32:57) Outro
KeywordsAI Literacy, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Education, Educational Psychology, Group Cohesion, Social Identity Theory, Educational Inclusion, Digital Competence, Large Language Models, Global North, Global South, Global Desert, Educational Policy, Interdisciplinary Research, Bibliometric Analysis, Digital Inequality
Note: This episode is a republished and revised version of one of our previous episodes, with adjustments made to enhance the sound quality and improve the overall flow of the conversation. Thank you very much for your understanding and continued support.]]>2021falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-girih-mode-in-context-experience-and-practice-toward-a-cognitive-ecology-of-islamic-ornament-in-contemporary-architectural-design-i--72529632In this episode, we explore how ornaments shape the ways we perceive, navigate, and experience visual environments together with Bahar Akgün from the Islamic Studies Department within the Faculty of Philosophy at Heidelberg University, who was also one of the presenters at the HGGS Summer Forum 2025, “Us and Them.” Her interdisciplinary research examines the girih mode of Islamic geometric ornament through the lenses of Islamic studies, art history, phenomenology, cognitive science, and contemporary architectural design, investigating how geometric patterns can influence perception, contemplation, and embodied experience. The conversation introduces listeners to the girih mode as a distinctive visual language characterized by interlaced geometric structures, star patterns, and endlessly extendable networks that have shaped the aesthetics of Islamic architecture across centuries. Bahar Akgün explains how current architectural debates increasingly approach ornament not only as a symbolic form, but also as a medium that produces affect, visual resonance, and embodied sensory experience. A central focus of the episode is Bahar Akgün’s innovative methodological framework, which combines phenomenological introspection, empirical aesthetics, and eye-tracking studies to investigate the “contemplative gaze” associated with girih patterns. We discuss how visual complexity guides perception, how patterns can embed their own “mode of seeing,” and how empirical methods can help bridge historical aesthetic theory with contemporary cognitive research. The conversation also reflects extensively on the realities of interdisciplinary scholarship. Bahar Akgün shares her experience of navigating multiple academic languages and epistemologies, and conducting research at the intersection of traditionally separate fields. Together, we explore the institutional challenges, and emotional dimensions of interdisciplinary research, and the importance of collaboration, systems thinking, and epistemological pluralism. Join us in this episode as we explore how Islamic geometric ornament reshapes our understanding of perception, aesthetics, architecture, and interdisciplinary research! For Bahar Akgün’s Academic Profile: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bahar-Akguen-2For Bahar Akgün´s HGGS Page: https://www.hggs.uni-heidelberg.de/en/about-us/members/bahar-akgun Timeline(00:00) Intro (00:24) Introducing Bahar Akgün and Her Academic Background (02:54) Motivation Behind the Research (05:10) The Modernist Suppression of Ornament and Its Contemporary Re-Emergence (08:45) Visual Resonance and Representation in Ornament (12:22) Defining Characteristics of Islamic Geometric Ornament and the Girih Mode (13:53) Interpretations of Islamic Ornament (19:34) Visualizing the Girih Mode (22:52) Developing a Methodological Framework for Analyzing the Girih Mode (26:42) Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Research (30:16) Working with Supervisors from Different Academic Backgrounds (36:00) Challenges and Rewards of Conducting Interdisciplinary Research (41:28) Collaboration, Systems Thinking, and Different Forms of Interdisciplinary Research (47:38) Future Academic Plans (51:21) Outro KeywordsGirih Mode, Islamic Ornament, Islamic Art, Islamic Studies, Architecture, Architectural Design, Computational Design, Cognitive Science, Phenomenology, Aesthetics, Eye-Tracking Research, Visual Perception, Contemplative Gaze, Aesthetics, Art History, Interdisciplinary Research, Systems Thinking, Islamic Architecture, Geometric Patterns, Methodology, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Scholarly Conversations]]>e45320b0-660c-4de4-8e54-9c8619c41443Mon, 15 Jun 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSBahar Akgün (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - What is the girih mode, and how has it been interpreted?- How can cognitive science and eye-tracking methods help us understand the experience of Islamic geometric...In this episode, we explore how ornaments shape the ways we perceive, navigate, and experience visual environments together with Bahar Akgün from the Islamic Studies Department within the Faculty of Philosophy at Heidelberg University, who was also one of the presenters at the HGGS Summer Forum 2025, “Us and Them.” Her interdisciplinary research examines the girih mode of Islamic geometric ornament through the lenses of Islamic studies, art history, phenomenology, cognitive science, and contemporary architectural design, investigating how geometric patterns can influence perception, contemplation, and embodied experience. The conversation introduces listeners to the girih mode as a distinctive visual language characterized by interlaced geometric structures, star patterns, and endlessly extendable networks that have shaped the aesthetics of Islamic architecture across centuries. Bahar Akgün explains how current architectural debates increasingly approach ornament not only as a symbolic form, but also as a medium that produces affect, visual resonance, and embodied sensory experience. A central focus of the episode is Bahar Akgün’s innovative methodological framework, which combines phenomenological introspection, empirical aesthetics, and eye-tracking studies to investigate the “contemplative gaze” associated with girih patterns. We discuss how visual complexity guides perception, how patterns can embed their own “mode of seeing,” and how empirical methods can help bridge historical aesthetic theory with contemporary cognitive research. The conversation also reflects extensively on the realities of interdisciplinary scholarship. Bahar Akgün shares her experience of navigating multiple academic languages and epistemologies, and conducting research at the intersection of traditionally separate fields. Together, we explore the institutional challenges, and emotional dimensions of interdisciplinary research, and the importance of collaboration, systems thinking, and epistemological pluralism. Join us in this episode as we explore how Islamic geometric ornament reshapes our understanding of perception, aesthetics, architecture, and interdisciplinary research! For Bahar Akgün’s Academic Profile: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bahar-Akguen-2For Bahar Akgün´s HGGS Page: https://www.hggs.uni-heidelberg.de/en/about-us/members/bahar-akgun Timeline(00:00) Intro (00:24) Introducing Bahar Akgün and Her Academic Background (02:54) Motivation Behind the Research (05:10) The Modernist Suppression of Ornament and Its Contemporary Re-Emergence (08:45) Visual Resonance and Representation in Ornament (12:22) Defining Characteristics of Islamic Geometric Ornament and the Girih Mode (13:53) Interpretations of Islamic Ornament (19:34) Visualizing the Girih Mode (22:52) Developing a Methodological Framework for Analyzing the Girih Mode (26:42) Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Research (30:16) Working with Supervisors from Different Academic Backgrounds (36:00) Challenges and Rewards of Conducting Interdisciplinary Research (41:28) Collaboration, Systems Thinking, and Different Forms of Interdisciplinary Research (47:38) Future Academic Plans (51:21) Outro KeywordsGirih Mode, Islamic Ornament, Islamic Art, Islamic Studies, Architecture, Architectural Design, Computational Design, Cognitive Science, Phenomenology, Aesthetics, Eye-Tracking Research, Visual Perception, Contemplative Gaze, Aesthetics, Art History, Interdisciplinary Research, Systems Thinking, Islamic Architecture, Geometric Patterns, Methodology, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Scholarly Conversations]]>3125falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/sustainability-and-sustainable-innovation-management-interview-with-dr-maximilian-jungmann-heidelberg-center-for-the-environment-heidel--72270658The episode explores how sustainable innovation differs from conventional innovation approaches by integrating environmental and social responsibility into both the goals and processes of innovation. Dr. Jungmann further elaborates on different forms of innovation, illustrating how technological and organizational change can contribute to more sustainable economic systems. The conversation also examines the role of sustainable business models and the growing importance of ESG frameworks, regulation, and sustainable entrepreneurship. We discuss the opportunities and challenges associated with the European Green Deal, the role of regulation in shaping innovation, and the tensions between long-term sustainability goals and short-term economic interests. In this context, Dr. Jungmann reflects on how businesses can combine profitability with societal impact and why organizational culture and leadership play a decisive role in successful sustainability transformation processes. Join us in this episode as we explore how sustainability, innovation, and interdisciplinary collaboration can contribute to addressing some of the most pressing environmental and societal challenges of our time!
HCE Website: https://www.hce.uni-heidelberg.deDr. Jungmann’s Profile: ⁠https://www.mnovum.com/dr-max-jungmann⁠Website of Momentum Novum: https://www.mnovum.com/Website of Falk Momentum: https://www.falk-momentum.com/%C3%BCber-uns Timeline(00:00) Intro (00:24) Introducing Dr. Jungmann (03:56) Research on Sustainability and Sustainable Innovation Management (08:16) What Does Sustainability Mean? (11:20) The Need for Transformation toward a Sustainable Future (13:57) Current Level of Progress in Sustainability (17:33) Regulation, Innovation, and the EU Green Deal (24:03) Sustainable Innovation Management (26:32) Forms of Sustainable Innovation (29:47) Sustainable Business Models (32:29) Competitive Advantages of Sustainable Business Models (34:56) Sufficiency-Driven Business Models (36:37) Organizational Culture and Sustainability Transformation (39:40) Sustainable Startups(44:47) International Climate Cooperation (47:12) The Mission of the HCE (49:32) Outro Keywords Sustainability, Sustainable Innovation Management, ESG Compliance, Sustainable Business Models, Innovation, Innovation Management, Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Green Deal, Climate Change, Sustainable Startups, Sustainability Consulting, Climate Policy, Sustainability Reporting, Corporate Responsibility, Interdisciplinary Research, Environmental Studies, Political Science, Heidelberg Center for the Environment, Heidelberg University, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast]]>cb79a537-2354-46d2-8f16-78c234db6d20Mon, 01 Jun 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSDr. Maximilian Jungmann (Heidelberg Center for the Environment, Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - What roles do companies, governments, and individuals play in creating a more sustainable future? - What...The episode explores how sustainable innovation differs from conventional innovation approaches by integrating environmental and social responsibility into both the goals and processes of innovation. Dr. Jungmann further elaborates on different forms of innovation, illustrating how technological and organizational change can contribute to more sustainable economic systems. The conversation also examines the role of sustainable business models and the growing importance of ESG frameworks, regulation, and sustainable entrepreneurship. We discuss the opportunities and challenges associated with the European Green Deal, the role of regulation in shaping innovation, and the tensions between long-term sustainability goals and short-term economic interests. In this context, Dr. Jungmann reflects on how businesses can combine profitability with societal impact and why organizational culture and leadership play a decisive role in successful sustainability transformation processes. Join us in this episode as we explore how sustainability, innovation, and interdisciplinary collaboration can contribute to addressing some of the most pressing environmental and societal challenges of our time!
HCE Website: https://www.hce.uni-heidelberg.deDr. Jungmann’s Profile: ⁠https://www.mnovum.com/dr-max-jungmann⁠Website of Momentum Novum: https://www.mnovum.com/Website of Falk Momentum: https://www.falk-momentum.com/%C3%BCber-uns Timeline(00:00) Intro (00:24) Introducing Dr. Jungmann (03:56) Research on Sustainability and Sustainable Innovation Management (08:16) What Does Sustainability Mean? (11:20) The Need for Transformation toward a Sustainable Future (13:57) Current Level of Progress in Sustainability (17:33) Regulation, Innovation, and the EU Green Deal (24:03) Sustainable Innovation Management (26:32) Forms of Sustainable Innovation (29:47) Sustainable Business Models (32:29) Competitive Advantages of Sustainable Business Models (34:56) Sufficiency-Driven Business Models (36:37) Organizational Culture and Sustainability Transformation (39:40) Sustainable Startups(44:47) International Climate Cooperation (47:12) The Mission of the HCE (49:32) Outro Keywords Sustainability, Sustainable Innovation Management, ESG Compliance, Sustainable Business Models,...]]>3016falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/magical-urbanism-thresholds-hybridity-and-the-transformative-power-of-us-and-them-in-woolf-lispector-and-lahiri-interview-with-tety--7205081848ef4132-ecfd-4968-b314-ca7edfccceecMon, 18 May 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSTetyana Kasima (University of Tartu) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - How do literature and urban spaces shape one another? - What are “heterotopic moments of being,” and how can they help us understand city life? - How do literary...1468falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-limits-of-understanding-towards-an-implementable-model-of-inter-paradigmatic-communication-interview-with-antoni-lukasik-warsaw-univ--71848367KeywordsLanguage, Political Communication, Climate Policy, Philosophy, Philosophy of Language, Empirical Philosophy, Environmental Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Ecuador, Public Discourse, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Understanding, Social Representation, Empirical Methods, Vernacularization, Qualitative Fieldwork, Critical Discourse Analysis, Contextual Analysis, Interdisciplinary Research, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Scholarly Conversations, Interdisciplinary Discussions, Interviews with Scholars, University Discourse, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Research Podcast, University Podcast, Heidelberg University, University of Warsaw, Collegio Futuro]]>7c455c6f-2181-4aba-9dbb-c6f345e79e47Mon, 04 May 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSAntoni Lukasik (Warsaw University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - What are the limits of understanding within the framework of language in political contexts?- How does Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophy reshape our understanding of...KeywordsLanguage, Political Communication, Climate Policy, Philosophy, Philosophy of Language, Empirical Philosophy, Environmental Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, Ecuador, Public Discourse, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Understanding, Social Representation, Empirical Methods, Vernacularization, Qualitative Fieldwork, Critical Discourse Analysis, Contextual Analysis, Interdisciplinary Research, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Scholarly Conversations, Interdisciplinary Discussions, Interviews with Scholars, University Discourse, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Research Podcast, University Podcast, Heidelberg University, University of Warsaw, Collegio Futuro]]>2900falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/differences-between-first-language-and-second-language-acquisition-psycholinguistics-and-cognitive-science-perspectives-interview-with-el--71481074b2fcb192-034d-408c-870d-b5e20e9889a5Mon, 20 Apr 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSElizaveta Savina (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - What are the fundamental differences between first and second language acquisition? - How do implicit and explicit learning processes shape language learning...3539falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-elgar-companion-to-the-g7-50-years-of-the-g7-interview-with-prof-dr-andreas-freytag-friedrich-schiller-university-jena--71126373https://www.wipo.uni-jena.de/en Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Prof. Dr. Freytag and His Academic Background(02:51) The Field of Political Economy(03:54) Motivation behind the Book “The Elgar Companion to the G7: 50 Years of the G7”(06:04) The Significance of International Collaboration(07:51) The Role of the G7 in Global Governance and Its Informal Structure(11:56) Multilateral vs. Bilateral Trade Agreements(13:35) The Relationship between G7 and Russia(15:50) The Role of the G20 in Global Governance(17:19) The Emergence of BRICS on the Global Stage(19:45) Historical Achievements of the G7(23:54) Policy Recommendations for the G7(26:09) Future of the G7(28:06) Personal Reflection: Future Academic Research Plans(30:12) Outro KeywordsG7, Group of Seven, Global Governance, International Relations, Economics, Global Politics, BRICS, Debt Relief, Multilateralism, Bilateralism, Global Diplomacy, Informal Diplomacy, Economic Policy, Political Economy, Policy Making, G20, Global Challenges, Regional Initiatives, Interdisciplinary Research, International Collaboration, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Scholarly Conversations, Interdisciplinary Discussions, Interviews with Scholars, University Discourse, Us and Them, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Heidelberg University, University Jena]]>bc494abd-6855-4f28-87a9-c63b4d777678Mon, 06 Apr 2026 04:00:00 +0000HGGSProf. Dr. Andreas Freytag (Friedrich Schiller University Jena) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - What role does the G7 play within the broader framework of global governance? - How does the informal structure of the G7 shape...https://www.wipo.uni-jena.de/en Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Prof. Dr. Freytag and His Academic Background(02:51) The Field of Political Economy(03:54) Motivation behind the Book “The Elgar Companion to the G7: 50 Years of the G7”(06:04) The Significance of International Collaboration(07:51) The Role of the G7 in Global Governance and Its Informal Structure(11:56) Multilateral vs. Bilateral Trade Agreements(13:35) The Relationship between G7 and Russia(15:50) The Role of the G20 in Global Governance(17:19) The Emergence of BRICS on the Global Stage(19:45) Historical Achievements of the G7(23:54) Policy Recommendations for the G7(26:09) Future of the G7(28:06) Personal Reflection: Future Academic Research Plans(30:12) Outro KeywordsG7, Group of Seven, Global Governance, International Relations, Economics, Global Politics, BRICS, Debt Relief, Multilateralism, Bilateralism, Global Diplomacy, Informal Diplomacy, Economic Policy, Political Economy, Policy Making, G20, Global Challenges, Regional Initiatives, Interdisciplinary Research, International Collaboration, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Scholarly Conversations, Interdisciplinary Discussions, Interviews with Scholars, University Discourse, Us and Them, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Heidelberg University, University Jena]]>1856falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hiv-prevention-in-sub-saharan-africa-interview-with-dr-maureen-mcgowan-heidelberg-university--70823138https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maureen-Mcgowan?ev=hdr_xprf Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Dr. McGowan and Her Academic Background(02:29) Motivation Behind the Research Topic(04:17) Understanding Challenges in HIV Prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa(07:20) Gender Disparities in HIV Exposure(09:25) Peer Referral as a Strategy for HIV Prevention(11:24) Recommendation for Strengthening Peer Referral in HIV Prevention(12:42) The Role of Social Support in HIV Prevention(15:34) Key Stakeholders in HIV Prevention Efforts(17:37) The Importance of a Shared Understanding among Stakeholders(19:08) Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy(20:45) Ethical Considerations in HIV Research(22:08) The Significance and Challenges of International Collaboration in Public Health(23:52) The Need for Interdisciplinary Approaches in HIV Prevention(26:30) The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Public Health Research(30:34) Methodological Approaches to Ensuring Reliable Research Outcomes(32:13) Personal Reflection: Cultural Insights from Global Research(34:30) Personal Reflection: Future Directions in HIV Research(35:57) Outro KeywordsHIV Prevention, HIV Testing, Sub-Saharan Africa, Global Health, Public Health, Peer Referral, Voluntary Assisted Partner Notification, VAPN, Public Health Policy, Social Support, Interdisciplinary Research, Gender Disparities, Gender Politics, Stakeholder Engagement, Policy Implementation, Cultural Factors, Cultural Dynamics, Cultural Norms, Stigmatisation, Sexual Health Education, Ethical Issues, International Collaboration,  Qualitative Research, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Scholarly Conversations, Interdisciplinary Discussions, Interviews with Scholars, University Discourse, Us and Them, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Heidelberg University]]>070c27ae-3cea-49df-a64c-8da2e009433eMon, 23 Mar 2026 05:00:00 +0000HGGSDr. Maureen McGowan, (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - How can peer referral strategies enhance HIV testing and prevention efforts?- What challenges arise when aligning public health research, policy, and local...https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maureen-Mcgowan?ev=hdr_xprf Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Dr. McGowan and Her Academic Background(02:29) Motivation Behind the Research Topic(04:17) Understanding Challenges in HIV Prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa(07:20) Gender Disparities in HIV Exposure(09:25) Peer Referral as a Strategy for HIV Prevention(11:24) Recommendation for Strengthening Peer Referral in HIV Prevention(12:42) The Role of Social Support in HIV Prevention(15:34) Key Stakeholders in HIV Prevention Efforts(17:37) The Importance of a Shared Understanding among Stakeholders(19:08) Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy(20:45) Ethical Considerations in HIV Research(22:08) The Significance and Challenges of International Collaboration in Public Health(23:52) The Need for Interdisciplinary Approaches in HIV Prevention(26:30) The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Public Health Research(30:34) Methodological Approaches to Ensuring Reliable Research Outcomes(32:13) Personal Reflection: Cultural Insights from Global Research(34:30) Personal Reflection: Future Directions in HIV Research(35:57) Outro KeywordsHIV Prevention, HIV Testing, Sub-Saharan Africa, Global Health, Public Health, Peer Referral, Voluntary Assisted Partner Notification, VAPN, Public Health Policy, Social Support, Interdisciplinary Research, Gender Disparities, Gender Politics, Stakeholder Engagement, Policy Implementation, Cultural Factors, Cultural Dynamics, Cultural Norms, Stigmatisation, Sexual Health Education, Ethical Issues, International Collaboration,  Qualitative Research, Interdisciplinary Scholarship, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Scholarly Conversations, Interdisciplinary Discussions, Interviews with Scholars, University Discourse, Us and Them, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Heidelberg University]]>2201falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/us-and-them-the-dangers-of-juxtaposing-colour-coded-narrative-worlds-interview-with-dr-radmila-mladenova-heidelberg-university--70544131https://www.fsa.uni-heidelberg.de/en/filmhub Note: Information about Dr. Mladenova’s upcoming digital workshop in October 2026 will be published on this website. Film Criticism Blog: https://www.fsa.uni-heidelberg.de/en/filmhub/filmkritik Dr. Mladenova´s Open-Access Dissertation: https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/catalog/book/989 Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Dr. Mladenova and Her Academic Background(04:02) Motivation behind the Research(07:23) Fictional Depictions of the Roma Community in Films and the Concept of 'Gypsy Mask' (09:00) Objective Criteria of Racism: Essentialization, Naturalization, Hierarchization and Polarization(11:33) “Us vs. Them” as a Social Relationship in Films Depicting the Roma Community(13:28) White vs. Black: The Use of Light and Darkness to Depict Hierarchy and Morality in Films(17:42) Stereotypes in Film Representations of the Roma Community(20:06) Commercial Interests behind Racist Stereotypes in Films(22:44) Metanarratives and “Hero's Journey” in Films Depicting Roma Community(24:07) Color Coding and Visual Language in Films(25:42) Changes in Stereotypical Narratives accross Different Eras(30:36) Stereotypes about the Roma Community in Contemporary Cinema(33:00) Importance of Interdisciplinary Approaches(34:01) Policy Recommendations and Efforts to Combat Anti-Gypsyism in Films(35:58) Public Awareness of Stereotypes in Films(38:21) Personal Insights: Future Research Directions and Upcoming Events(40:51) Outro KeywordsRoma Community, Film Stereotypes, Anti-Gypsyism, Cinematic Language, Racism in Media, Racism, Film Analysis, Visual Storytelling, Representation, Intercultural Understanding, Film Narratives, Roma and Sinti, Critical Analysis, Color Coding, Hero´s Journey, Visual Language, Movie Analysis, Cinema Analysis, Metanarratives, Interdisciplinary Research, Hierarchical Relationships, Social Relationships, Us and Them, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Heidelberg University]]>6bbab3ab-ae38-4131-990f-1ae6bece5b30Mon, 09 Mar 2026 05:00:00 +0000HGGSDr. Radmila Mladenova (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - Which stereotypical metanarratives have historically dominated films depicting the Roma community?- How does the contrast between light and darkness function...https://www.fsa.uni-heidelberg.de/en/filmhub Note: Information about Dr. Mladenova’s upcoming digital workshop in October 2026 will be published on this website. Film Criticism Blog: https://www.fsa.uni-heidelberg.de/en/filmhub/filmkritik Dr. Mladenova´s Open-Access Dissertation: https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/catalog/book/989 Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Dr. Mladenova and Her Academic Background(04:02) Motivation behind the Research(07:23) Fictional Depictions of the Roma Community in Films and the Concept of 'Gypsy Mask' (09:00) Objective Criteria of Racism: Essentialization, Naturalization, Hierarchization and Polarization(11:33) “Us vs. Them” as a Social Relationship in Films Depicting the Roma Community(13:28) White vs. Black: The Use of Light and Darkness to Depict Hierarchy and Morality in Films(17:42) Stereotypes in Film Representations of the Roma Community(20:06) Commercial Interests behind Racist Stereotypes in Films(22:44) Metanarratives and “Hero's Journey” in Films Depicting Roma Community(24:07) Color Coding and Visual Language in Films(25:42) Changes in Stereotypical Narratives accross Different Eras(30:36) Stereotypes about the Roma Community in Contemporary Cinema(33:00) Importance of Interdisciplinary Approaches(34:01) Policy Recommendations and Efforts to Combat Anti-Gypsyism in Films(35:58) Public Awareness of Stereotypes in Films(38:21) Personal Insights: Future Research Directions and Upcoming Events(40:51) Outro KeywordsRoma Community, Film Stereotypes, Anti-Gypsyism, Cinematic Language, Racism in Media, Racism, Film Analysis, Visual Storytelling, Representation, Intercultural Understanding, Film Narratives, Roma and Sinti, Critical Analysis, Color Coding, Hero´s Journey, Visual Language, Movie Analysis, Cinema Analysis, Metanarratives, Interdisciplinary Research, Hierarchical Relationships, Social Relationships,...]]>2495falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/environmental-economics-circular-economy-green-innovation-and-economic-impacts-of-weather-shocks-interview-with-dr-federico--70221076a9d842c4-e3c5-4315-a9f3-afac8390a358Mon, 23 Feb 2026 05:00:00 +0000HGGSDr. Federico Zilia (University of Milan) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS)-       What role can the circular economy approach play in addressing current environmental challenges?-       How can we distinguish “green innovations” from...3224falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/zooming-in-on-individuals-in-post-apocalyptic-fiction-emotions-and-coping-strategies-in-times-of-transition-interview-with-sel--6988266985c64ff7-a4b3-4f2e-babd-88a137b7bdd3Mon, 09 Feb 2026 05:00:00 +0000HGGSSelin Beyhan (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - What coping strategies do characters in post-apocalyptic novels use to deal with the challenges of post-apocalyptic settings?- What emotions do fictional characters...2826falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ambivalent-enmity-in-bordering-processes-interview-with-dr-philipp-zehmisch-heidelberg-university--69587337https://www.sai.uni-heidelberg.de/en/departments-and-branches/anthropology/team/dr-philipp-zehmisch Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Dr. Philipp Zehmisch and His Academic Background(05:45) Past, Present and Future in the Context of Borders(10:38) The “Inwards” and “Across” Approaches in Examining the Partition(15:57) Cultural Production and Cross-Border Collaboration(19:26) The Role of Music and Religion in Borderlands(25:05) Social Class and Caste Dynamics in Borderlands(28:07) The Shift toward Cross-Border Ethics and Human Interaction(33:50) The Changing Dynamics of “Us and Them” in the Diaspora(37:23) Methodology: Ethno-Historiography in Anthropology(41:04) The Role of Oral Histories in State and Border Dynamics(43:02) Personal Reflections(48:28) Future Projects(50:42) Outro KeywordsAmbivalent Amnesty, Bordering Processes, Borders, India, Pakistan, Partition, Colonialism, South Asia, Anthropology, Migration, Cultural Production, Borderlands, Partition, Social Class, Ethno Historiography, Religion, Islam, Hinduism, Sufism, Music, Cultural Resilience, Nation States, Cross-Border Collaboration, Politics, Border Making, Identity, Human Interaction, Andaman Islands, Diaspora, Inequality, Subalternity, Caste Dynamics, Interdisciplinary Research, Methodology, Us and Them, Social Sciences, Humanities, Heidelberg University, Scientific Podcast, Academic Podcast]]>b6060f07-5cb1-4f2b-84af-ac86708080cbMon, 26 Jan 2026 05:00:00 +0000HGGSDr. Philipp Zehmisch (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - How did the partition between Indiaand Pakistan shape the ambivalent enmity between these cultures?- What forms of cultural resilience have developed along...https://www.sai.uni-heidelberg.de/en/departments-and-branches/anthropology/team/dr-philipp-zehmisch Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Dr. Philipp Zehmisch and His Academic Background(05:45) Past, Present and Future in the Context of Borders(10:38) The “Inwards” and “Across” Approaches in Examining the Partition(15:57) Cultural Production and Cross-Border Collaboration(19:26) The Role of Music and Religion in Borderlands(25:05) Social Class and Caste Dynamics in Borderlands(28:07) The Shift toward Cross-Border Ethics and Human Interaction(33:50) The Changing Dynamics of “Us and Them” in the Diaspora(37:23) Methodology: Ethno-Historiography in Anthropology(41:04) The Role of Oral Histories in State and Border Dynamics(43:02) Personal Reflections(48:28) Future Projects(50:42) Outro KeywordsAmbivalent Amnesty, Bordering Processes, Borders, India, Pakistan, Partition, Colonialism, South Asia, Anthropology, Migration, Cultural Production, Borderlands, Partition, Social Class, Ethno Historiography, Religion, Islam, Hinduism, Sufism, Music, Cultural Resilience, Nation States, Cross-Border Collaboration, Politics, Border Making, Identity, Human Interaction, Andaman Islands, Diaspora, Inequality, Subalternity, Caste Dynamics, Interdisciplinary Research, Methodology, Us and Them, Social Sciences, Humanities, Heidelberg University, Scientific Podcast, Academic Podcast]]>3086falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/strange-creatures-imaging-and-imagining-other-peoples-interview-with-dr-martin-hofmann-heidelberg-university--694321075e3e53f4-c580-41c0-934d-9b1bb1ded211Wed, 14 Jan 2026 05:00:00 +0000HGGSDr. Martin Hofmann (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) In the first episode of the year 2026, Dr. Martin Hofmann from the Department of Intellectual History at the Heidelberg Centre for Transcultural Studies,...2504falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/determination-of-criminal-responsibility-the-usability-of-ai-in-criminal-proceedings-and-implications-on-human-rights-intervi--69129331- What are the possible use cases for AI in criminal proceedings?- What are the limitations of AI indetermining human intentions in criminal proceedings?- What might the use of AI in criminal proceedings imply for human rights?
In this episode, Isabell Eiwan from the Faculty of Law at Heidelberg University and a participant in the Marsilius-Kolleg Summer School 2025 “AI and Human Values,” discusses the intersection of AI and criminal responsibility. Together, we explore what the use of AI in legal proceedings could mean in practice and what it might imply for human rights. The conversation touches on how criminal responsibility is defined, the role of free will, and the limits of AI when it comes to interpreting human intentions. Our guest, Isabell Eiwan, also highlights the value of interdisciplinary collaboration in developing AI tools for the legal system, while thoughtfully weighing both the challenges and the potential benefits of integrating AI into criminal justice. Join us as we unpack where AI meets criminal proceedings and why this convergence carries important implications for the legal system and fundamental rights.
Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Isabell Eiwan(03:10) Understanding the Concept of Criminal Responsibility(04:45) The Role of Free Will in Criminal Law(08:02) AI's Limitations in Understanding Human Intentions(10:13) Current Legal Standards for Determining Criminal Responsibility and the Integration of AI(12:17) Expert Opinions and the Role of the Judge(13:27) Challenges of AI in Legal Contexts(14:35) The Impact of “Empathy” in Criminal Proceedings(16:29) The Black Box Phenomenon(18:16) Potential Benefits of AI in Criminal Justice(21:02) Should AI’s Opinions Be Binding in the Criminal Proceedings?(22:10) Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Developing AI for Criminal Law(24:15) Evaluating AI's Effectiveness in Legal Decision-Making(26:24) AI Decision-Making Process(28:37) Comparing French, British, and German Legal Studies(32:17) Personal Insights: Metal Music(36:00) Outro
KeywordsAI, artificial intelligence, criminal responsibility, legal responsibility, criminal law, diminished responsibility, criminal proceedings, human rights, free will, legal standards, intentions, empathy, black box phenomenon, interdisciplinary collaboration, legal technology, limitations of AI, legal decision making, AI decision making, interdisciplinary research, bias, judges, legal studies, academic podcast, scientific podcast, us and them, Heidelberg University]]>457fc285-f8f7-4361-9faa-c7b7ac3aea63Fri, 19 Dec 2025 05:00:00 +0000HGGSIsabell Eiwan (Faculty of Law, Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - What are the possible use cases for AI in criminal proceedings?- What are the limitations of AI indetermining human intentions in criminal...- What are the possible use cases for AI in criminal proceedings?- What are the limitations of AI indetermining human intentions in criminal proceedings?- What might the use of AI in criminal proceedings imply for human rights?
In this episode, Isabell Eiwan from the Faculty of Law at Heidelberg University and a participant in the Marsilius-Kolleg Summer School 2025 “AI and Human Values,” discusses the intersection of AI and criminal responsibility. Together, we explore what the use of AI in legal proceedings could mean in practice and what it might imply for human rights. The conversation touches on how criminal responsibility is defined, the role of free will, and the limits of AI when it comes to interpreting human intentions. Our guest, Isabell Eiwan, also highlights the value of interdisciplinary collaboration in developing AI tools for the legal system, while thoughtfully weighing both the challenges and the potential benefits of integrating AI into criminal justice. Join us as we unpack where AI meets criminal proceedings and why this convergence carries important implications for the legal system and fundamental rights.
Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Isabell Eiwan(03:10) Understanding the Concept of Criminal Responsibility(04:45) The Role of Free Will in Criminal Law(08:02) AI's Limitations in Understanding Human Intentions(10:13) Current Legal Standards for Determining Criminal Responsibility and the Integration of AI(12:17) Expert Opinions and the Role of the Judge(13:27) Challenges of AI in Legal Contexts(14:35) The Impact of “Empathy” in Criminal Proceedings(16:29) The Black Box Phenomenon(18:16) Potential Benefits of AI in Criminal Justice(21:02) Should AI’s Opinions Be Binding in the Criminal Proceedings?(22:10) Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Developing AI for Criminal Law(24:15) Evaluating AI's Effectiveness in Legal Decision-Making(26:24) AI Decision-Making Process(28:37) Comparing French, British, and German Legal Studies(32:17) Personal Insights: Metal Music(36:00) Outro
KeywordsAI, artificial intelligence, criminal responsibility, legal responsibility, criminal law, diminished responsibility, criminal proceedings, human rights, free will, legal standards, intentions, empathy, black box phenomenon, interdisciplinary collaboration, legal technology, limitations of AI, legal decision making, AI decision making, interdisciplinary research, bias, judges, legal studies, academic podcast, scientific podcast, us and them, Heidelberg University]]>2205falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-concept-of-citizen-science-and-mapping-tobacco-and-alcohol-retail-interview-with-prof-dr-connie-hoe-and-ezgi-baltaci--68970873-  What should be understood by the concept of “citizen science,” and what distinguishes citizen science from other scientific approaches? -  Why is it important to include the public in the scientific research process?-  What insights does the mapping of tobacco and alcohol retail provide within the framework of public health research?
In this episode, Professor Dr. Connie Hoe and researcher Ezgi Baltacı from the Division of Policy and Implementation Research for Cancer Prevention at the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum) talk about the concept of citizen science and its application in public health research, focusing on their project “Mapping Tobacco and Alcohol Retail in Mannheim, Germany.” They reflect on the importance of interdisciplinary research, the benefits of involving the public in scientific work in the field of public health, the ethical considerations that come with the citizen science approach, and policy recommendations for tobacco and alcohol control. The conversation highlights the challenges of citizen science projects, the methodology used in their research, and the initial results of their mapping project, emphasizing the community’s role in shaping health behaviors. Join us as we explore citizen science and its use cases in public health research with our expert guests!
Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Prof. Connie Hoe and Ezgi Baltacı(03:43) Activities of the Division of Policy and Implementation Research for Cancer Prevention at the German Cancer Research Center(07:24) Interdisciplinary Research and Its Importance in the field of Public Health(08:27) Understanding Citizen Science(10:40) The Social Aspect of Citizen Science(12:32) How Citizen Science Differs from Other Scientific Research Methods?(14:13) Public Engagement and Ethics in Citizen Science(17:30) Challenges in Citizen Science Projects(18:25) Data Quality and Reliability(20:23) The Research Project “Mapping Tobacco and Alcohol Retail in Mannheim”(24:25) Methodology, Recruitment Strategies and Community Impact(28:41) Challenges during the Project “Mapping Tobacco and Alcohol Retail in Mannheim”(32:07) “Citizen Mapping Day” Experience(35:31) Initial Results of the Project(37:34) Migrant Health Research(40:08) Policy Recommendations for Regulation of Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption(43:29) Future Academic Plans(45:27) Personal reflection: What will be missed most when leaving Heidelberg?(49:30) Outro
KeywordsCitizen Science, Public Health, Tobacco Retail, Alcohol Retail, Interdisciplinary Research, Community Engagement, Policy Implementation, Health Behavior, Research Ethics, Heidelberg, Mannheim, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Mapping Project, Cancer Prevention, Health Research, Policy and Implementation Research, Heidelberg University, Ethics, Ethical Considerations, Tobacco Control, Alcohol Control, Local Health Policy, Recruitment Strategies, Public Engagement, Data Quality, Data Reliability, Community Participation, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Us and Them]]>55197024-a84f-40e5-be49-6a0c017cee26Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:00:00 +0000HGGSProf. Dr. Connie Hoe and Ezgi Baltacı (German Cancer Research Center) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) -  What should be understood by the concept of “citizen science,” and what distinguishes citizen science from other scientific...-  What should be understood by the concept of “citizen science,” and what distinguishes citizen science from other scientific approaches? -  Why is it important to include the public in the scientific research process?-  What insights does the mapping of tobacco and alcohol retail provide within the framework of public health research?
In this episode, Professor Dr. Connie Hoe and researcher Ezgi Baltacı from the Division of Policy and Implementation Research for Cancer Prevention at the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum) talk about the concept of citizen science and its application in public health research, focusing on their project “Mapping Tobacco and Alcohol Retail in Mannheim, Germany.” They reflect on the importance of interdisciplinary research, the benefits of involving the public in scientific work in the field of public health, the ethical considerations that come with the citizen science approach, and policy recommendations for tobacco and alcohol control. The conversation highlights the challenges of citizen science projects, the methodology used in their research, and the initial results of their mapping project, emphasizing the community’s role in shaping health behaviors. Join us as we explore citizen science and its use cases in public health research with our expert guests!
Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Prof. Connie Hoe and Ezgi Baltacı(03:43) Activities of the Division of Policy and Implementation Research for Cancer Prevention at the German Cancer Research Center(07:24) Interdisciplinary Research and Its Importance in the field of Public Health(08:27) Understanding Citizen Science(10:40) The Social Aspect of Citizen Science(12:32) How Citizen Science Differs from Other Scientific Research Methods?(14:13) Public Engagement and Ethics in Citizen Science(17:30) Challenges in Citizen Science Projects(18:25) Data Quality and Reliability(20:23) The Research Project “Mapping Tobacco and Alcohol Retail in Mannheim”(24:25) Methodology, Recruitment Strategies and Community Impact(28:41) Challenges during the Project “Mapping Tobacco and Alcohol Retail in Mannheim”(32:07) “Citizen Mapping Day” Experience(35:31) Initial Results of the Project(37:34) Migrant Health Research(40:08) Policy Recommendations for Regulation of Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption(43:29) Future Academic Plans(45:27) Personal reflection: What will be missed most when leaving Heidelberg?(49:30) Outro
KeywordsCitizen Science, Public Health, Tobacco Retail, Alcohol Retail, Interdisciplinary Research, Community Engagement, Policy Implementation, Health Behavior, Research Ethics, Heidelberg, Mannheim, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Mapping Project, Cancer Prevention, Health Research, Policy and Implementation Research, Heidelberg University, Ethics, Ethical Considerations, Tobacco Control, Alcohol Control, Local Health Policy, Recruitment Strategies, Public Engagement, Data Quality, Data Reliability, Community Participation, Academic Podcast, Scientific Podcast, Us and Them]]>3039falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-contribution-of-the-philosophy-of-hans-jonas-gunther-anders-and-hannah-arendt-to-responsibility-in-the-ethics-of-ai-inter--68394351- What makes AI ethics distinct from other areas of ethics?- What is required for the “responsible” use of AI?- How can the philosophies of Hans Jonas, GüntherAnders, and Hannah Arendt provide guidance in addressing the challenges of AI?
In this episode, Alexandre Bretel from the Grenoble Alpes University and participant in the Marsilius-Kolleg Summer School 2025 “AI and Human Values” joins us to explore the intersection of AI ethics and responsibility through the perspectives of Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and Hannah Arendt. Together, we reflect on the philosophical foundations of AI ethics, the meaning of responsibility, and the so-called “responsibility gap” in AI systems. The conversation also turns to broader questions—how AI challenges human autonomy, the difference between innovation and progress, and the fine line between utopian promise and dystopian risk. We further discuss the ethical dimensions of surveillance, the importance of individual responsibility, and what policy approaches might guide the development of truly responsible AI.
Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Alexandre Bretel and His Research Focus(03:11) Fundamentals of AI Ethics(06:48) The Perspectives of Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and Hannah Arendt on Responsibility(09:18) Understanding the Concept of Responsibility in AI(10:43) The Responsibility Gap in AI Systems(13:09) Implications of AI on Human Autonomy(15:52) Innovation vs. Progress in Technology(19:36) Utopia, Anti-Utopia and Dystopia in the framework of AI Ethics(21:32) Surveillance and AI: Ethical Implications(24:35) Individual Responsibility in the Age of AI(27:02) Policy Recommendations for Responsible AI(29:13) The Blurring Lines between Private and Public Spheres(31:22) Personal Reflection: Importance of Philosophical Wanderings(33:36) Outro
KeywordsAI ethics, responsibility, Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, Hannah Arendt, technology, human autonomy, innovation, progress, surveillance, utopia, dystopia, anti-utopia, technology ethics, wandering, AI systems, environment, AI regulation, AI policy]]>b720f126-1c5d-4034-b90d-c3d4f2ff964fMon, 03 Nov 2025 05:00:00 +0000HGGSAlexandre Bretel (Grenoble Alpes University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) - What makes AI ethics distinct from other areas of ethics?- What is required for the “responsible” use of AI?- How can the philosophies of Hans Jonas,...- What makes AI ethics distinct from other areas of ethics?- What is required for the “responsible” use of AI?- How can the philosophies of Hans Jonas, GüntherAnders, and Hannah Arendt provide guidance in addressing the challenges of AI?
In this episode, Alexandre Bretel from the Grenoble Alpes University and participant in the Marsilius-Kolleg Summer School 2025 “AI and Human Values” joins us to explore the intersection of AI ethics and responsibility through the perspectives of Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and Hannah Arendt. Together, we reflect on the philosophical foundations of AI ethics, the meaning of responsibility, and the so-called “responsibility gap” in AI systems. The conversation also turns to broader questions—how AI challenges human autonomy, the difference between innovation and progress, and the fine line between utopian promise and dystopian risk. We further discuss the ethical dimensions of surveillance, the importance of individual responsibility, and what policy approaches might guide the development of truly responsible AI.
Timeline(00:00) Intro(00:24) Introducing Alexandre Bretel and His Research Focus(03:11) Fundamentals of AI Ethics(06:48) The Perspectives of Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, and Hannah Arendt on Responsibility(09:18) Understanding the Concept of Responsibility in AI(10:43) The Responsibility Gap in AI Systems(13:09) Implications of AI on Human Autonomy(15:52) Innovation vs. Progress in Technology(19:36) Utopia, Anti-Utopia and Dystopia in the framework of AI Ethics(21:32) Surveillance and AI: Ethical Implications(24:35) Individual Responsibility in the Age of AI(27:02) Policy Recommendations for Responsible AI(29:13) The Blurring Lines between Private and Public Spheres(31:22) Personal Reflection: Importance of Philosophical Wanderings(33:36) Outro
KeywordsAI ethics, responsibility, Hans Jonas, Günther Anders, Hannah Arendt, technology, human autonomy, innovation, progress, surveillance, utopia, dystopia, anti-utopia, technology ethics, wandering, AI systems, environment, AI regulation, AI policy]]>2061ntherfalsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/thinking-for-speaking-yourself-interview-with-pd-dr-johannes-gerwien-heidelberg-university--68193835What are the functions of “inner speech” within the framework of cognitive science?What role does the linguistic relativism theory play in inner speech and the thinking process?Is language-free cognition even possible?
In this episode, PD Dr. Johannes Gerwien discusses the intricate relationship between language, thought, and cognition. He explores various aspects of language production, including inner speech, self-monitoring, executive control, and the nature of language encoding. The conversation delves into linguistic relativity theory, the impact of language acquisition on cognitive processes, and the challenges of studying inner speech. PD Dr. Gerwien also highlights the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in cognitive science and the potential for overcoming language barriers through shared experiences and understanding the nature of these barriers.
Timeline00:00 Intro00:24 Introducing PD Dr. Johannes Gerwien04:45 Understanding Language Production09:02 Self-Monitoring and Executive Control in Language Production12:24 Incremental Language Encoding18:23 Linguistic Relativity Theory23:41 Thinking for Speaking Yourself Hypothesis25:58 Language Acquisition in Language and Thought31:28 Difference between Verbal and Nonverbal Tasks36:11 Methodological Challenges in Inner Speech Research37:12 Is Language-Free Cognition Possible?41:33 Generalizability Problem in Linguistic Research46:18 When We Talk to Ourselves, Who Are We Really Addressing? 50:51 Overcoming Language Barriers56:11 CAS Cognitive Science Program at Heidelberg University01:01:24 Outro
Keywordslinguistics, language production, inner speech, linguistic relativity, cognitive science, cognition, language and thought, language acquisition, language production, language encoding, psycholinguistics, thinking for speaking, self-monitoring executive control, attention, language barriers]]>836b2460-8d64-4528-9c02-d5b030d14bbeSat, 18 Oct 2025 12:39:21 +0000HGGSPD Dr. Johannes Gerwien (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) What are the functions of “inner speech” within the framework of cognitive science?What role does the linguistic relativism theory play in inner speech and...What are the functions of “inner speech” within the framework of cognitive science?What role does the linguistic relativism theory play in inner speech and the thinking process?Is language-free cognition even possible?
In this episode, PD Dr. Johannes Gerwien discusses the intricate relationship between language, thought, and cognition. He explores various aspects of language production, including inner speech, self-monitoring, executive control, and the nature of language encoding. The conversation delves into linguistic relativity theory, the impact of language acquisition on cognitive processes, and the challenges of studying inner speech. PD Dr. Gerwien also highlights the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in cognitive science and the potential for overcoming language barriers through shared experiences and understanding the nature of these barriers.
Timeline00:00 Intro00:24 Introducing PD Dr. Johannes Gerwien04:45 Understanding Language Production09:02 Self-Monitoring and Executive Control in Language Production12:24 Incremental Language Encoding18:23 Linguistic Relativity Theory23:41 Thinking for Speaking Yourself Hypothesis25:58 Language Acquisition in Language and Thought31:28 Difference between Verbal and Nonverbal Tasks36:11 Methodological Challenges in Inner Speech Research37:12 Is Language-Free Cognition Possible?41:33 Generalizability Problem in Linguistic Research46:18 When We Talk to Ourselves, Who Are We Really Addressing? 50:51 Overcoming Language Barriers56:11 CAS Cognitive Science Program at Heidelberg University01:01:24 Outro
Keywordslinguistics, language production, inner speech, linguistic relativity, cognitive science, cognition, language and thought, language acquisition, language production, language encoding, psycholinguistics, thinking for speaking, self-monitoring executive control, attention, language barriers]]>3728falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/us-and-them-in-east-and-west-jewish-identity-constructions-in-the-habsburg-monarchy-interview-with-maximilian-kathan-heidelb--6793000827b6843b-da27-4b89-9d40-1f7f5ebf73e8Sun, 28 Sep 2025 12:18:18 +0000HGGSMaximilian Kathan (Heidelberg University of Jewish Studies) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) What is the impact of nationalism and antisemitism in the late Habsburg Monarchy?How did Karl Emil Franzos and Nathan Birnbaum contribute to the...2104falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/comparative-perspectives-on-literary-travel-motifs-in-contemporary-jewish-literature-of-germany-israel-and-usa-interview-with--67846997Timeline00:00 Intro00:28 Introducing Nadja Samira Fraenkel and Her Research05:29 Exploring the Concept of Travel in Literature08:51 Travel Motif and Identity Politics in Jewish Literature13:56 The Search for Utopia in Travel Narratives18:10 The Third Generation of Jewish Authors27:19 Methodology in Comparative Literary Studies31:17 Language as a Space for Belonging37:45 The Role of Social Challanges and Counter Narratives in Jewish Literature51:53 Art, Identity, and the Political Nature of Creativity59:11 Outro
KeywordsJewish literature, travel motives, identity politics, comparative literature, contemporary authors, diaspora, utopia, third generation, literary analysis, cultural studies]]>a31c748a-d32c-4c50-92fc-f5c31845c549Mon, 22 Sep 2025 04:00:00 +0000HGGSNadja Samira Fraenkel (Heidelberg University) in conversation with Sinan Barış Yaşar (HGGS) How does the travel motif shape narratives in third-generation Jewish literature? What are the differences between physical and metaphorical journeys? Can...Timeline00:00 Intro00:28 Introducing Nadja Samira Fraenkel and Her Research05:29 Exploring the Concept of Travel in Literature08:51 Travel Motif and Identity Politics in Jewish Literature13:56 The Search for Utopia in Travel Narratives18:10 The Third Generation of Jewish Authors27:19 Methodology in Comparative Literary Studies31:17 Language as a Space for Belonging37:45 The Role of Social Challanges and Counter Narratives in Jewish Literature51:53 Art, Identity, and the Political Nature of Creativity59:11 Outro
KeywordsJewish literature, travel motives, identity politics, comparative literature, contemporary authors, diaspora, utopia, third generation, literary analysis, cultural studies]]>3156falsefullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/where-are-the-feet-narratives-of-belonging-and-alterity--67803692Language of the Episode: Spanish

In this episode, Vanessa Márquez Vargas, Debby Avendaño Sánchez, and Adrián Navia Segovia, all from the University of Los Andes, Venezuela, present a hybrid theme combining text and image, with the goal of showing, from their perspective and experiences, how objects, walls, absences, and design shape social and spatial realities. For this, the cultural, urban, and architectural dimensions of belonging have been taken into consideration in order to foster a dialogue about the ‘Us’ & ‘Them’ dichotomy through three brief sections: 1) The Shoe as a Semiotic Object;2) The Absence of Feet: The Uninhabited Space;3) "Walking in Someone Else's Shoes": The Architect and the Community.

Description of the Theme by the Presenters
“For us, what we have been saying and observing here just scratches the surface of the complex dynamics of belonging and alterity in everyday life, dynamics we believe deserve greater attention. Within these often-overlooked details, assumed as normalized, there is fertile ground for reflection and social action. The shoe, as a semiotic object, encodes status and identity, and in doing so, exposes social fractures. The absence of feet in urban spaces signals alienation, compelling us to reclaim the city as a shared place. In architecture, empathy transforms design into a collaborative act, creating spaces that resonate with community aspirations. These narratives challenge us to inhabit with intention, to bridge distances, tear down walls, and to walk, both literally and metaphorically, in the shoes of the other, forging a more inclusive, participatory, and meaningful world. Yet the question persists: Can we truly feel what the other feels, or will there always be an insurmountable distance? Each of us must arrive at our own answer, one that may spark dialogue, internal monologue, or, better yet, conscious action toward those we label as 'other' and normalize as 'them' in the continuous present.” 

LÍNEA DEL TIEMPO
00:00   Intro
00:23   Presentación de Vanessa Márquez Vargas, Debby Avendaño Sánchez y Adrián Navia Segovia por Sinan Barış Yaşar
03:18   Presentación del tema en español por Vanessa Márquez Vargas “¿Dónde están los pies?” Narrativas de pertenencia y alteridad
04:47   Parte 1: “El Zapato como objeto semiótico” por Vanessa Márquez Vargas
09:39   Parte 2: “La ausencia de los pies: los espacios deshabitados” por Adrián Navia Segovia
21:43   Parte 3: “Caminando con los zapatos del otro: el Arquitecto y la Comunidad” por Debby Avendaño Sánchez
32:11   Reflexión integradora: dimensiones articuladas en un continuum semiótico
34:33   Cierre del tema, agradecimiento y despedida

TIMELINE
00:00   Intro
00:23   Presentation of Vanessa Márquez Vargas, Debby Avendaño Sánchez, and Adrián Navia Segovia by Sinan Barış Yaşar 
03:18   Topic introduction in Spanish by Vanessa Márquez Vargas: “Where Are the Feet?” Narratives of Belonging and Alterity
04:47   Part 1: “The Shoe as a Semiotic Object” by Vanessa Márquez Vargas 
09:39   Part 2: “The Absence of Feet: The Uninhabited Space” by Adrián Navia Segovia 
21:43   Part 3: “Walking in Someone Else’s Shoes: The Architect and the Community” by Debby Avendaño Sánchez 
32:11   Integrative Reflection: Dimensions Articulated in a Semiotic Continuum 
34:33   Closing of the Topic, Thanks, and Farewell]]>d24f6b8c-7af6-4c94-9ea7-cb2b494a4a52Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:06:23 +0000HGGSConversation with Vanessa Márquez Vargas, Debby Avendaño Sánchez, and Adrián Navia Segovia (University of Los Andes, Venezuela) Language of the Episode: Spanish In this episode, Vanessa Márquez Vargas, Debby Avendaño Sánchez, and Adrián Navia...Language of the Episode: Spanish

In this episode, Vanessa Márquez Vargas, Debby Avendaño Sánchez, and Adrián Navia Segovia, all from the University of Los Andes, Venezuela, present a hybrid theme combining text and image, with the goal of showing, from their perspective and experiences, how objects, walls, absences, and design shape social and spatial realities. For this, the cultural, urban, and architectural dimensions of belonging have been taken into consideration in order to foster a dialogue about the ‘Us’ & ‘Them’ dichotomy through three brief sections: 1) The Shoe as a Semiotic Object;2) The Absence of Feet: The Uninhabited Space;3) "Walking in Someone Else's Shoes": The Architect and the Community.

Description of the Theme by the Presenters
“For us, what we have been saying and observing here just scratches the surface of the complex dynamics of belonging and alterity in everyday life, dynamics we believe deserve greater attention. Within these often-overlooked details, assumed as normalized, there is fertile ground for reflection and social action. The shoe, as a semiotic object, encodes status and identity, and in doing so, exposes social fractures. The absence of feet in urban spaces signals alienation, compelling us to reclaim the city as a shared place. In architecture, empathy transforms design into a collaborative act, creating spaces that resonate with community aspirations. These narratives challenge us to inhabit with intention, to bridge distances, tear down walls, and to walk, both literally and metaphorically, in the shoes of the other, forging a more inclusive, participatory, and meaningful world. Yet the question persists: Can we truly feel what the other feels, or will there always be an insurmountable distance? Each of us must arrive at our own answer, one that may spark dialogue, internal monologue, or, better yet, conscious action toward those we label as 'other' and normalize as 'them' in the continuous present.” 

LÍNEA DEL TIEMPO
00:00   Intro
00:23   Presentación de Vanessa Márquez Vargas, Debby Avendaño Sánchez y Adrián Navia Segovia por Sinan Barış Yaşar
03:18   Presentación del tema en español por Vanessa Márquez Vargas “¿Dónde están los pies?” Narrativas de pertenencia y alteridad
04:47   Parte 1: “El Zapato como objeto semiótico” por Vanessa Márquez Vargas
09:39   Parte 2: “La ausencia de los pies: los espacios deshabitados” por Adrián Navia Segovia
21:43   Parte 3: “Caminando con los zapatos del otro: el Arquitecto y la Comunidad” por Debby Avendaño Sánchez
32:11   Reflexión integradora: dimensiones articuladas en un continuum semiótico
34:33   Cierre del tema, agradecimiento y despedida

TIMELINE
00:00   Intro
00:23   Presentation of Vanessa Márquez Vargas, Debby Avendaño Sánchez, and Adrián Navia Segovia by Sinan Barış Yaşar 
03:18   Topic introduction in Spanish by Vanessa Márquez Vargas: “Where Are the Feet?” Narratives of Belonging and Alterity
04:47   Part 1: “The Shoe as a Semiotic Object” by Vanessa Márquez Vargas 
09:39   Part 2: “The Absence of Feet: The Uninhabited Space” by Adrián Navia Segovia 
21:43   Part 3: “Walking in Someone Else’s Shoes: The Architect and the Community” by Debby Avendaño Sánchez 
32:11   Integrative Reflection: Dimensions Articulated in a Semiotic Continuum 
34:33   Closing of the Topic, Thanks, and Farewell]]>2245falsefull