Automotive Quality and Engineeringhttps://massimoplavsicconsulenza.com/ Feel free to enjoy and to follow me and my groups also on LinkedIn...https://www.linkedin.com/in/ma...

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>enBusinessCopyright Veljko Massimo Plavsichttps://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/334b11b62b07a7933a24ef62d8d1f42f.jpgAutomotive Quality and Engineeringhttps://massimoplavsicconsulenza.com/Wed, 08 Jul 2026 17:08:20 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicVeljko Massimo Plavsicplavsicmassimo@gmail.comAre you involved somehow in the automotive industry?Here are some curious podcasts that you may like ... Feel free to enjoy and to follow me and my groups also on LinkedIn...https://www.linkedin.com/in/massimoplavsic Feel free to enjoy and to follow me and my groups also on LinkedIn...https://www.linkedin.com/in/ma...

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>false362e9ad8-d439-5034-bd2b-66d519873ff9episodicSupport the podcast!Porsche cutting jobshttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/porsche-cutting-jobs--72871546 The necessity for this realignment is underscored by stark financial data: while Group revenue reached €36.27 billion, the operating return on sales plummeted to a marginal 1.1%. This decline was exacerbated by €3.9 billion in extraordinary expenses stemming from US tariffs, rising input costs, and the high price of shifting product strategies. To restore its status as a high-margin leader, Porsche’s "leaner and faster" mandate aims to optimize capital allocation and accelerate development cycles.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72871546Wed, 08 Jul 2026 16:51:12 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicIn response to a fiscal environment defined by severe margin pressure and global volatility, Porsche AG has initiated an aggressive industrial recalibration known as Strategy 2035, executed through the tactical vehicle of Structure Package II. For the... The necessity for this realignment is underscored by stark financial data: while Group revenue reached €36.27 billion, the operating return on sales plummeted to a marginal 1.1%. This decline was exacerbated by €3.9 billion in extraordinary expenses stemming from US tariffs, rising input costs, and the high price of shifting product strategies. To restore its status as a high-margin leader, Porsche’s "leaner and faster" mandate aims to optimize capital allocation and accelerate development cycles.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>1019falsefullClamoroso dietrofront della Ford ...ritorno degli ingegnerihttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/clamoroso-dietrofront-della-ford-ritorno-degli-ingegneri--72793971 1. Inquadramento Strategico: Il Fallimento della Governance nell'Era Digitale
Il caso Ford (2020-2026) non deve essere derubricato a mero incidente di percorso tecnologico; esso rappresenta una profonda crisi di governance e una disfunzione sistemica nella gestione del cambiamento. Il fulcro del fallimento risiede nell'incapacità del Board di supervisionare e auditare i protocolli di knowledge capture durante la transizione verso i sistemi Cyber-Fisici. Questa miopia strategica funge da monito per il settore manifatturiero globale: l'illusione che l'automazione possa prescindere dalla stratificazione dell'esperienza umana conduce inevitabilmente a un collasso dell'eccellenza operativa.Tra il 2020 e il 2024, Ford ha perseguito una strategia di automazione massiva, eliminando circa 5.300 posizioni dedicate al controllo qualità in favore di algoritmi di intelligenza artificiale. Tuttavia, la realtà industriale ha imposto un brusco riposizionamento strategico, culminato nella reintegrazione di 300-350 ingegneri e ispettori qualità senior. Come evidenziato da Charles Poon (VP Hardware Engineering), l'azienda ha operato sotto l'assunto erroneo che l'alimentazione dei sistemi con i soli requisiti tecnici formali fosse sufficiente a garantire la conformità del prodotto. Kumar Galhotra (COO) ha successivamente confermato la necessità di ripristinare il capitale intellettuale umano per intercettare le criticità dei componenti prima della fase di mass production. La discrepanza tra le aspettative algoritmiche e la qualità reale ha evidenziato una falla nel trasferimento della conoscenza, dove la velocità di adozione ha tragicamente superato la capacità di codifica del sapere esperto.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72793971Thu, 02 Jul 2026 18:29:20 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicAnalisi di Caso: Ford e il Paradosso dell'Automazione – Criticità Metodologiche e Lezioni di Leadership 1. Inquadramento Strategico: Il Fallimento della Governance nell'Era Digitale Il caso Ford (2020-2026) non deve essere derubricato a mero incidente... 1. Inquadramento Strategico: Il Fallimento della Governance nell'Era Digitale
Il caso Ford (2020-2026) non deve essere derubricato a mero incidente di percorso tecnologico; esso rappresenta una profonda crisi di governance e una disfunzione sistemica nella gestione del cambiamento. Il fulcro del fallimento risiede nell'incapacità del Board di supervisionare e auditare i protocolli di knowledge capture durante la transizione verso i sistemi Cyber-Fisici. Questa miopia strategica funge da monito per il settore manifatturiero globale: l'illusione che l'automazione possa prescindere dalla stratificazione dell'esperienza umana conduce inevitabilmente a un collasso dell'eccellenza operativa.Tra il 2020 e il 2024, Ford ha perseguito una strategia di automazione massiva, eliminando circa 5.300 posizioni dedicate al controllo qualità in favore di algoritmi di intelligenza artificiale. Tuttavia, la realtà industriale ha imposto un brusco riposizionamento strategico, culminato nella reintegrazione di 300-350 ingegneri e ispettori qualità senior. Come evidenziato da Charles Poon (VP Hardware Engineering), l'azienda ha operato sotto l'assunto erroneo che l'alimentazione dei sistemi con i soli requisiti tecnici formali fosse sufficiente a garantire la conformità del prodotto. Kumar Galhotra (COO) ha successivamente confermato la necessità di ripristinare il capitale intellettuale umano per intercettare le criticità dei componenti prima della fase di mass production. La discrepanza tra le aspettative algoritmiche e la qualità reale ha evidenziato una falla nel trasferimento della conoscenza, dove la velocità di adozione ha tragicamente superato la capacità di codifica del sapere esperto.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>1400falsefullPPAP requirements IATF 16949 Ford CSR June 2026https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ppap-requirements-iatf-16949-ford-csr-june-2026--72770414 The Hook: A New Standard for 2026
On June 15, 2026, the margin for error in the Ford supply chain effectively evaporates. The release of Ford’s new Customer-Specific Requirements (CSR) for PPAP 4.0 and Service PPAP 1.0 represents more than a documentation refresh; it is a fundamental shift toward the Special Characteristics Communication and Agreement Form (SCCAF) process. If you think this is just another administrative hurdle, you aren't paying attention. This CSR is a mandate for unprecedented transparency and statistical precision.
For Tier 1 and sub-tier suppliers, surviving this transition requires moving beyond "check-the-box" compliance. From capacity-linked quality triggers to the mandate of advanced statistical modeling, Ford is tightening the noose on variability. If your Quality Lab is still relying on legacy Excel templates for Range-based R&R, you are already behind the 2026 curve.Takeaway 1: Capacity is Now a Quality Trigger
In a move that caught many Logistics and Purchasing departments off guard, Ford has officially moved capacity verification into the domain of the Supplier Technical Assistance (STA) engineer. Per Page 6 of the CSR, a PPAP submission is now triggered by volume changes alone:
Revised Ford required capacity exceeding verified supplier capacity
This is a massive organizational shift. By linking manufacturing logistics directly to formal quality approval in Section 2.2, Ford is essentially giving the STA site engineer "veto power" over production increases. If your quality data cannot support the stress of a higher run-rate, your capacity "uplift" will be denied. Quality and Logistics can no longer operate in silos; a production volume increase is now legally and technically a quality event.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72770414Wed, 01 Jul 2026 12:37:53 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicFord’s 2026 Quality Pivot: A Survival Guide to the New PPAP Updates The Hook: A New Standard for 2026 On June 15, 2026, the margin for error in the Ford supply chain effectively evaporates. The release of Ford’s new Customer-Specific Requirements... The Hook: A New Standard for 2026
On June 15, 2026, the margin for error in the Ford supply chain effectively evaporates. The release of Ford’s new Customer-Specific Requirements (CSR) for PPAP 4.0 and Service PPAP 1.0 represents more than a documentation refresh; it is a fundamental shift toward the Special Characteristics Communication and Agreement Form (SCCAF) process. If you think this is just another administrative hurdle, you aren't paying attention. This CSR is a mandate for unprecedented transparency and statistical precision.
For Tier 1 and sub-tier suppliers, surviving this transition requires moving beyond "check-the-box" compliance. From capacity-linked quality triggers to the mandate of advanced statistical modeling, Ford is tightening the noose on variability. If your Quality Lab is still relying on legacy Excel templates for Range-based R&R, you are already behind the 2026 curve.Takeaway 1: Capacity is Now a Quality Trigger
In a move that caught many Logistics and Purchasing departments off guard, Ford has officially moved capacity verification into the domain of the Supplier Technical Assistance (STA) engineer. Per Page 6 of the CSR, a PPAP submission is now triggered by volume changes alone:
Revised Ford required capacity exceeding verified supplier capacity
This is a massive organizational shift. By linking manufacturing logistics directly to formal quality approval in Section 2.2, Ford is essentially giving the STA site engineer "veto power" over production increases. If your quality data cannot support the stress of a higher run-rate, your capacity "uplift" will be denied. Quality and Logistics can no longer operate in silos; a production volume increase is now legally and technically a quality event.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>2405falsefullIATF 16949 FORD CSR JUNE 2026https://www.spreaker.com/episode/iatf-16949-ford-csr-june-2026--72770106 1. Introduction: The High-Stakes Evolution of the Global Supply Chain
Automotive suppliers today operate under a regime of unprecedented technical and logistical pressure. In this high-stakes environment, the release of the "Ford Customer-Specific Requirements (CSR) — Effective June 15, 2026" represents a definitive pivot for organizations utilizing the SCCAF process.
This update is far more than a routine manual refresh; it is a strategic manifesto for the future of the Ford-supplier relationship. It signals a decisive shift toward high-velocity transparency, predictive risk management, and absolute Tier-1 accountability for the entire value chain. For the modern quality professional, this document is no longer just a reference—it is the roadmap for operational survival.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72770106Wed, 01 Jul 2026 12:18:22 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicBeyond Compliance: 5 Impactful Shifts in Ford’s 2026 Quality Requirements Every Supplier Must Know 1. Introduction: The High-Stakes Evolution of the Global Supply Chain Automotive suppliers today operate under a regime of unprecedented technical and... 1. Introduction: The High-Stakes Evolution of the Global Supply Chain
Automotive suppliers today operate under a regime of unprecedented technical and logistical pressure. In this high-stakes environment, the release of the "Ford Customer-Specific Requirements (CSR) — Effective June 15, 2026" represents a definitive pivot for organizations utilizing the SCCAF process.
This update is far more than a routine manual refresh; it is a strategic manifesto for the future of the Ford-supplier relationship. It signals a decisive shift toward high-velocity transparency, predictive risk management, and absolute Tier-1 accountability for the entire value chain. For the modern quality professional, this document is no longer just a reference—it is the roadmap for operational survival.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>2405falsefullHARA,_ASIL,_ISO_26262__L_Architettura_Segreta_della_Sicurezza_Ahttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/hara-asil-iso-26262-l-architettura-segreta-della-sicurezza-a--684020011.0 Introduction and Report Scope
This technical report formally establishes the safety requirements, design specifications, and validation protocols for a next-generation automotive safety system. The rapid evolution of vehicle automation necessitates a rigorous, standards-driven approach to ensure that safety-critical systems perform reliably under all foreseeable conditions. The primary objective of this document is to detail the comprehensive framework that guarantees the system's compliance with critical industry standards, thereby delivering a robust and reliable safety solution. This framework begins with an understanding of the system's fundamental functional architecture.
2.0 System Overview and Core Functionality
A clear understanding of the system's fundamental architecture is a prerequisite for analyzing its safety requirements. The design is centered on a single, unambiguous purpose that informs every component and process. The system's core mission is to proactively detect and mitigate potential collision scenarios by interpreting the vehicle's environment and taking decisive, automated action when necessary. This is achieved through the coordinated operation of three key components:
• Sensor Fusion Module: Integrates and processes a continuous stream of data from diverse inputs, including Radar, LiDAR, and Cameras, to generate a unified and persistent object track file of the surrounding environment.
• Decision Making Unit (DMU): Assesses risks based on the fused sensor data and triggers appropriate preventative or mitigating responses according to pre-defined safety logic.
• Actuator Interface: Executes the DMU's commands by interfacing directly with and controlling the vehicle's braking, steering, and throttle systems.
The design, integration, and operation of these components are not arbitrary; they are strictly governed by internationally recognized safety and cybersecurity standards.
3.0 Governing Safety & Cybersecurity Standards
Adherence to internationally recognized standards is the non-negotiable cornerstone of the system's design philosophy. Our interpretation and application of these standards are conservative, prioritizing safety margins over design simplicity. This commitment ensures that functional safety and resilience are engineered into the product from its inception. Our development lifecycle is comprehensively aligned with the leading standards for automotive functional safety and cybersecurity.
3.1 Functional Safety Compliance: ISO 26262
Our design ensures full compliance with the ISO 26262: "Road vehicles – Functional safety" standard, which provides a risk-based approach for automotive electrical and electronic systems. To meet the highest level of safety, the system is engineered to meet ASIL D, the most stringent classification for risk reduction

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/68402001Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:07:49 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicTechnical Report: Safety Requirements and Design Specifications for Next-Generation Automotive Systems 1.0 Introduction and Report Scope This technical report formally establishes the safety requirements, design specifications, and validation...1.0 Introduction and Report Scope
This technical report formally establishes the safety requirements, design specifications, and validation protocols for a next-generation automotive safety system. The rapid evolution of vehicle automation necessitates a rigorous, standards-driven approach to ensure that safety-critical systems perform reliably under all foreseeable conditions. The primary objective of this document is to detail the comprehensive framework that guarantees the system's compliance with critical industry standards, thereby delivering a robust and reliable safety solution. This framework begins with an understanding of the system's fundamental functional architecture.
2.0 System Overview and Core Functionality
A clear understanding of the system's fundamental architecture is a prerequisite for analyzing its safety requirements. The design is centered on a single, unambiguous purpose that informs every component and process. The system's core mission is to proactively detect and mitigate potential collision scenarios by interpreting the vehicle's environment and taking decisive, automated action when necessary. This is achieved through the coordinated operation of three key components:
• Sensor Fusion Module: Integrates and processes a continuous stream of data from diverse inputs, including Radar, LiDAR, and Cameras, to generate a unified and persistent object track file of the surrounding environment.
• Decision Making Unit (DMU): Assesses risks based on the fused sensor data and triggers appropriate preventative or mitigating responses according to pre-defined safety logic.
• Actuator Interface: Executes the DMU's commands by interfacing directly with and controlling the vehicle's braking, steering, and throttle systems.
The design, integration, and operation of these components are not arbitrary; they are strictly governed by internationally recognized safety and cybersecurity standards.
3.0 Governing Safety & Cybersecurity Standards
Adherence to internationally recognized standards is the non-negotiable cornerstone of the system's design philosophy. Our interpretation and application of these standards are conservative, prioritizing safety margins over design simplicity. This commitment ensures that functional safety and resilience are engineered into the product from its inception. Our development lifecycle is comprehensively aligned with the leading standards for automotive functional safety and cybersecurity.
3.1 Functional Safety Compliance: ISO 26262
Our design ensures full compliance with the ISO 26262: "Road vehicles – Functional safety" standard, which provides a risk-based approach for automotive electrical and electronic systems. To meet the highest level of safety, the system is engineered to meet ASIL D, the most stringent classification for risk reduction

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>1217adas,car safetyfalsefullDecoding_Automotive_Safety__An_Engineering_Forensics_Dive_into_https://www.spreaker.com/episode/decoding-automotive-safety-an-engineering-forensics-dive-into--68401989
  • The Journey of an Automotive Safety Sys
  • The Journey of an Automotive Safety System: From Concept to Car
  • In base a 1 fonte
  • The Journey of an Automotive Safety System: From Concept to Car
  • Introduction: The Mission of Modern Automotive Safety
  • Developing a new automotive safety system is a critical mission with a clear objective: to prevent accidents and, when they are unavoidable, to minimize injuries. This process is a complex journey, transforming a promising idea into a reliable feature integrated into millions of vehicles worldwide.
  • This guide is designed to demystify that journey for students of engineering and technology. We will explore the four core phases of development, providing a clear roadmap from the initial concept to the finished car rolling off the assembly line, and explaining the engineering rationale that guides every step.
  • --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • 1. Phase 1: Laying the Foundation - Research and Analysis
  • Before a single component is designed, we must first build a deep and comprehensive understanding of the landscape. This foundational phase is essential for defining the "what" and "why" of the entire project, ensuring the final system is relevant, compliant, and technologically superior. Key activities include:
  • • Market Research: This involves a thorough analysis of existing safety systems and consumer expectations. From an engineering perspective, the strategic goal is to define specific performance benchmarks and feature sets that will offer a measurable safety advantage over existing solutions.
  • • Regulatory Analysis: Every safety system must meet stringent legal and performance standards. This activity ensures the design will comply with crucial regulations from bodies like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the U.S. and the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), which are non-negotiable prerequisites for market access.
  • • Technology Scouting: The automotive landscape is in a constant state of evolution. This step involves exploring emerging technologies—such as advances in artificial intelligence, sensor fusion techniques, and Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication, which allows vehicles to share safety data—to determine which innovations can be leveraged to build a more effective and reliable system.
    • With the problem space rigorously defined, the team can now transition from analysis to synthesis—the creation of a tangible engineering solution.tem: From Concept to Car


    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/68401989Mon, 03 Nov 2025 17:54:27 +0000Veljko Massimo Plavsic- The Journey of an Automotive Safety Sys - The Journey of an Automotive Safety System: From Concept to Car - In base a 1 fonte - The Journey of an Automotive Safety System: From Concept to Car - Introduction: The Mission of Modern Automotive Safety -...
  • The Journey of an Automotive Safety Sys
  • The Journey of an Automotive Safety System: From Concept to Car
  • In base a 1 fonte
  • The Journey of an Automotive Safety System: From Concept to Car
  • Introduction: The Mission of Modern Automotive Safety
  • Developing a new automotive safety system is a critical mission with a clear objective: to prevent accidents and, when they are unavoidable, to minimize injuries. This process is a complex journey, transforming a promising idea into a reliable feature integrated into millions of vehicles worldwide.
  • This guide is designed to demystify that journey for students of engineering and technology. We will explore the four core phases of development, providing a clear roadmap from the initial concept to the finished car rolling off the assembly line, and explaining the engineering rationale that guides every step.
  • --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • 1. Phase 1: Laying the Foundation - Research and Analysis
  • Before a single component is designed, we must first build a deep and comprehensive understanding of the landscape. This foundational phase is essential for defining the "what" and "why" of the entire project, ensuring the final system is relevant, compliant, and technologically superior. Key activities include:
  • • Market Research: This involves a thorough analysis of existing safety systems and consumer expectations. From an engineering perspective, the strategic goal is to define specific performance benchmarks and feature sets that will offer a measurable safety advantage over existing solutions.
  • • Regulatory Analysis: Every safety system must meet stringent legal and performance standards. This activity ensures the design will comply with crucial regulations from bodies like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the U.S. and the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), which are non-negotiable prerequisites for market access.
  • • Technology Scouting: The automotive landscape is in a constant state of evolution. This step involves exploring emerging technologies—such as advances in artificial intelligence, sensor fusion techniques, and Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication, which allows vehicles to share safety data—to determine which innovations can be leveraged to build a more effective and reliable system.
    • With the problem space rigorously defined, the team can now transition from analysis to synthesis—the creation of a tangible engineering solution.tem: From Concept to Car


    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    538adas,car safetyfalsefull    The_Paradox_of_Lean__Why_the_Toyota_System_Works_Everywhere_Buthttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-paradox-of-lean-why-the-toyota-system-works-everywhere-but--68238672Introduction: The Enduring Puzzle of Lean Manufacturing
    For decades, the Toyota Production System (TPS) has been the gold standard for operational excellence, driving remarkable success at companies like Toyota and Danaher. After its principles were globally popularized in the 1990 book The Machine that Changed the World, one would expect its widespread adoption. The book’s authors coined the term “lean manufacturing,” which quickly became synonymous with continuous improvement.
    And yet, a puzzling question remains. In the United States alone, there are over 240,000 companies with 50 or more employees, but very few have successfully implemented TPS. Why does this proven system remain so elusive? The problem often begins with the name itself. Author James Womack later expressed regret over the term “lean manufacturing,” noting that it “misleads people into thinking TPS only applies to manufacturing operations.” In contrast, Jeffrey Liker intentionally titled his groundbreaking book The Toyota Way to emphasize that TPS is a comprehensive philosophy, not merely a set of techniques.
    This fundamental misunderstanding is the key to the puzzle. Most organizations fail because they treat TPS as a set of tools to be layered onto their existing business model. In reality, it is a complete and integrated system built on a foundation that most leaders overlook entirely.
    It's a Complete Economic System, Not a Toolbox

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/68238672Wed, 22 Oct 2025 12:04:34 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicWhy 'Going Lean' Fails: The Hidden Philosophy Behind Toyota's Success Introduction: The Enduring Puzzle of Lean Manufacturing For decades, the Toyota Production System (TPS) has been the gold standard for operational excellence, driving remarkable...Introduction: The Enduring Puzzle of Lean Manufacturing
    For decades, the Toyota Production System (TPS) has been the gold standard for operational excellence, driving remarkable success at companies like Toyota and Danaher. After its principles were globally popularized in the 1990 book The Machine that Changed the World, one would expect its widespread adoption. The book’s authors coined the term “lean manufacturing,” which quickly became synonymous with continuous improvement.
    And yet, a puzzling question remains. In the United States alone, there are over 240,000 companies with 50 or more employees, but very few have successfully implemented TPS. Why does this proven system remain so elusive? The problem often begins with the name itself. Author James Womack later expressed regret over the term “lean manufacturing,” noting that it “misleads people into thinking TPS only applies to manufacturing operations.” In contrast, Jeffrey Liker intentionally titled his groundbreaking book The Toyota Way to emphasize that TPS is a comprehensive philosophy, not merely a set of techniques.
    This fundamental misunderstanding is the key to the puzzle. Most organizations fail because they treat TPS as a set of tools to be layered onto their existing business model. In reality, it is a complete and integrated system built on a foundation that most leaders overlook entirely.
    It's a Complete Economic System, Not a Toolbox

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    783kaizen,lean,toyota production systemfalsefull    FMEA__Preventing_Failurehttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/fmea-preventing-failure--68052871Think of FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) as a 'pre-mortem' for your product or process—a structured way to anticipate failure and prevent it before it ever happens. Used by industries from aerospace to automotive, it's a powerful tool for looking into the future, identifying what might go wrong, and taking steps to stop it. This guide will break down the core concepts of FMEA into simple, understandable steps, giving you the foundation to understand this essential quality management technique.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/68052871Tue, 07 Oct 2025 21:11:11 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicAn Introduction to FMEA: A Beginner's Guide to Proactive Risk Management Think of FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) as a 'pre-mortem' for your product or process—a structured way to anticipate failure and prevent it before it ever happens. Used...Think of FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) as a 'pre-mortem' for your product or process—a structured way to anticipate failure and prevent it before it ever happens. Used by industries from aerospace to automotive, it's a powerful tool for looking into the future, identifying what might go wrong, and taking steps to stop it. This guide will break down the core concepts of FMEA into simple, understandable steps, giving you the foundation to understand this essential quality management technique.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    419aiag,automotive,fmea,vdafalsefull    Processo_Approvazione_PPAPhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/processo-approvazione-ppap--67985705
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67985705Thu, 02 Oct 2025 13:04:45 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThe sources provide a comprehensive overview of the Production Part Approval Process (PPAP), a standardized methodology primarily used in the automotive and aerospace industries to ensure parts consistently meet customer quality specifications. They...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    380falsefull    La SCADenza ..https://www.spreaker.com/episode/la-scadenza--67880633
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67880633Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:52:29 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicUn nuovo episodio di Gatto del Destino vi aspetta e vi porterà avanti nelle avventure di nostri protagonisti Vincent e Matthew,due coraggiosi giovani giornalisti 
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    148ilgattodeldestino,matthee,spionaggio,vincentfalse14full    VIN vehicle identification numberhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/vin-vehicle-identification-number--67702017
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67702017Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:20:07 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicHave you ever heard abythis acronym?How much you know about?Do you know where to find it?
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    537falsefull    AI Transforms Auto Recall Managementhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ai-transforms-auto-recall-management--67030839
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67030839Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:31:23 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThe provided text, primarily an excerpt from an article by Paul Myles, discusses how artificial intelligence (AI) can revolutionize the automotive industry by identifying vehicle problems proactively. The author highlights that car manufacturers...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    549ai,automotive,recallsfalsefull    Kia Sportage Brake System Recallhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/kia-sportage-brake-system-recall--67030814
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67030814Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:28:49 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThis document describes a Kia Sportage recall affecting 23,887 vehicles manufactured between September 8, 2022, and June 14, 2023, due to a faulty vacuum pump that could lead to increased brake pedal force and an illuminated engine indicator light....
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    382brakes defective,kia,recallfalsefull    V2X_ Digital Highways and Communication Speedhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/v2x-digital-highways-and-communication-speed--67030775🚗
    V2X: Digital Highways and Communication Speed

    The provided source examines the transformative Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) technology, exploring how it interconnects vehicles with their surroundings. It highlights the critical role of communication speed and latency in V2X applications, especially for safety-critical functions. The text compares two primary V2X technologies, Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) and Cellular-V2X (C-V2X), detailing their respective speeds, latency, and communication ranges across various V2X components such as Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V), Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I), Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P), and Vehicle-to-Network (V2N). Ultimately, the source concludes that the optimal V2X technology depends on the specific application, with C-V2X offering greater versatility for future connected services.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67030775Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:25:48 +0000Veljko Massimo Plavsic🚗 V2X: Digital Highways and Communication Speed The provided source examines the transformative Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) technology, exploring how it interconnects vehicles with their surroundings. It highlights the critical role of communication...🚗
    V2X: Digital Highways and Communication Speed

    The provided source examines the transformative Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) technology, exploring how it interconnects vehicles with their surroundings. It highlights the critical role of communication speed and latency in V2X applications, especially for safety-critical functions. The text compares two primary V2X technologies, Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) and Cellular-V2X (C-V2X), detailing their respective speeds, latency, and communication ranges across various V2X components such as Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V), Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I), Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P), and Vehicle-to-Network (V2N). Ultimately, the source concludes that the optimal V2X technology depends on the specific application, with C-V2X offering greater versatility for future connected services.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    637v2xfalsefull    Ford's Fuel Injector Recall_ A Persistent Problemhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ford-s-fuel-injector-recall-a-persistent-problem--67030717
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67030717Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:20:51 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicAn article from Automotive Dive reports that Ford has issued a recall for approximately 694,000 Bronco Sport and Escape SUVs due to a defect where fuel injectors may crack and leak, posing a fire hazard. This issue affects models equipped with...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    560ford,fuel injector defet,recallfalsefull    Volvo XC40 Recall_ Braking System Malfunction Riskhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/volvo-xc40-recall-braking-system-malfunction-risk--67030662
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67030662Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:18:53 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThis article from Car-Recalls.eu details a significant recall for various Volvo models, including the XC40, manufactured between 2019 and 2025. The primary concern is a braking system malfunction that can disable braking functionality in specific...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    401brake pedal defective,recall,volvo c40falsefull    Ford Transit Custom Speed Recallhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ford-transit-custom-speed-recall--67030648
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67030648Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:15:31 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThis article from Car-Recalls.eu details a recall for Ford Transit Custom vehicles manufactured between July 2023 and April 2025. The recall, affecting 18,584 units, addresses a safety concern where the vehicle can unintentionally exceed its displayed...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    382ford,recall,speed,transitfalsefull    Ford Recalls Escapes and Bronco Sports for Fire Riskhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ford-recalls-escapes-and-bronco-sports-for-fire-risk--67030635
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67030635Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:12:28 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThe provided text details a significant recall by Ford, affecting nearly 700,000 Escape and Bronco Sport vehicles from specific model years. The core issue stems from a potential defect in the 1.5-liter engine's fuel injector, which could crack and...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    423bronco,escape,fire risk,ford,recallfalsefull    Ford Recalls 850K Vehicles for Defective Fuel Pumpshttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ford-recalls-850k-vehicles-for-defective-fuel-pumps--67030606
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67030606Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:09:59 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThis document from Automotive Dive reports on Ford Motor Co.'s recall of 850,000 vehicles due to defective low-pressure fuel delivery modules (FDMs) that can cause engine stalling. The recall impacts various 2021-2023 Ford and Lincoln models, with the...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    653fire risk,ford,fuel pump,recallfalsefull    Nissan's Engine Recall and Turnaround Challengeshttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/nissan-s-engine-recall-and-turnaround-challenges--66916522
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/66916522Wed, 09 Jul 2025 16:53:15 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThis article from Automotive Dive reports on a significant recall by Nissan North America, affecting nearly 444,000 vehicles due to a manufacturing defect in specific engine components that could lead to engine failures. The National Highway Traffic...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    1750falsefull    Stellantis Diesel Recall_ 600,000 Vehicles Affectedhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/stellantis-diesel-recall-600-000-vehicles-affected--66874528
    Article Publication: Emiliano Ragoni publishes the article "Stellantis: maxi-richiamo per oltre 600.000 diesel" on alVolante.it, announcing the large-scale recall.
    Recall Details Released: The article specifies that the recall affects Peugeot, Citroën, Opel, DS, and Fiat vehicles produced between 2017 and 2023 with the 1.5 BlueHDi engine. The recall aims to address potential premature wear of the camshaft chain.
    Stellantis's Stated Actions: The company advises owners to contact service networks. The intervention includes a software update and, if necessary, an oil change. If the diagnostic application detects an anomaly, the chain will be preventively replaced.
    Recall Prioritization: The recall will be gradual, prioritizing older, higher-risk vehicles.
    Compensation for Prior Repairs: Customers who previously paid for repairs related to chain breakage may be eligible for reimbursement, requiring documentation and contact with customer service, potentially escalating to consumer associations.
    Public Reaction/Comments: Readers comment on the news, expressing frustration, concern, and criticism regarding Stellantis's quality control, previous engine issues (PureTech, cerina tank), and comparisons to other manufacturers. Some recall Carlos Tavares's past statements.
    Post July 4, 2025:

    Owners of affected vehicles will begin to be contacted and are encouraged to contact Stellantis service centers.
    Diagnostic tests using the new acoustic analysis application will be performed during the recall and future maintenance.
    Repairs (software updates, oil changes, or chain replacements) will be carried out by authorized workshops.
    Customers seeking reimbursement for past repairs will follow the outlined procedure.
    Stellantis continues to face public scrutiny regarding its engine reliability and recall practices.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/66874528Sun, 06 Jul 2025 11:42:41 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicJuly 4, 2025: Article Publication: Emiliano Ragoni publishes the article "Stellantis: maxi-richiamo per oltre 600.000 diesel" on alVolante.it, announcing the large-scale recall. Recall Details Released: The article specifies that the recall affects...
    Article Publication: Emiliano Ragoni publishes the article "Stellantis: maxi-richiamo per oltre 600.000 diesel" on alVolante.it, announcing the large-scale recall.
    Recall Details Released: The article specifies that the recall affects Peugeot, Citroën, Opel, DS, and Fiat vehicles produced between 2017 and 2023 with the 1.5 BlueHDi engine. The recall aims to address potential premature wear of the camshaft chain.
    Stellantis's Stated Actions: The company advises owners to contact service networks. The intervention includes a software update and, if necessary, an oil change. If the diagnostic application detects an anomaly, the chain will be preventively replaced.
    Recall Prioritization: The recall will be gradual, prioritizing older, higher-risk vehicles.
    Compensation for Prior Repairs: Customers who previously paid for repairs related to chain breakage may be eligible for reimbursement, requiring documentation and contact with customer service, potentially escalating to consumer associations.
    Public Reaction/Comments: Readers comment on the news, expressing frustration, concern, and criticism regarding Stellantis's quality control, previous engine issues (PureTech, cerina tank), and comparisons to other manufacturers. Some recall Carlos Tavares's past statements.
    Post July 4, 2025:

    Owners of affected vehicles will begin to be contacted and are encouraged to contact Stellantis service centers.
    Diagnostic tests using the new acoustic analysis application will be performed during the recall and future maintenance.
    Repairs (software updates, oil changes, or chain replacements) will be carried out by authorized workshops.
    Customers seeking reimbursement for past repairs will follow the outlined procedure.
    Stellantis continues to face public scrutiny regarding its engine reliability and recall practices.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    1479falsefull    Stellantis Airbag Recall_ Citroen C3 and DS3 Stop-Drive Orderhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/stellantis-airbag-recall-citroen-c3-and-ds3-stop-drive-order--66629684
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/66629684Thu, 19 Jun 2025 15:19:52 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicThe provided text, originating from Automotive News, highlights Stellantis's expanded "stop drive" order across Europe for certain Citroen C3 and DS 3 models. This urgent directive, impacting vehicles manufactured from 2009 to 2019 across 24...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    318falsefull    Ford IATF Customer-Specific Requirements_ 2025 Releasehttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/ford-iatf-customer-specific-requirements-2025-release--66566303
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/66566303Sun, 15 Jun 2025 16:20:47 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicQuesto documento del 2025 delinea i requisiti specifici per il cliente di Ford Motor Company per il sistema di gestione della qualità IATF 16949:2016, applicabile ai fornitori del settore automobilistico. Il testo illustra le aspettative di Ford in...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    4609csr,ford,iatffalsefull    Stellantis IATF 16949 Customer-Specific Requirementshttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/stellantis-iatf-16949-customer-specific-requirements--66566247
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    https://api.spreaker.com/episode/66566247Sun, 15 Jun 2025 16:18:25 +0000Veljko Massimo PlavsicStellantis IATF 16949 Customer-Specific RequirementsQuesto documento delinea i requisiti specifici del cliente (CSR) di Stellantis, da utilizzare in congiunzione con lo standard IATF 16949, per i suoi fornitori. Spiega come Stellantis organizza il...
    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/automotive-quality-and-engineering--6656590/support.]]>    3416iatf,stellantisfalse11full