https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/constitutional-integrity--6609355enSociety & CultureCopyright Lombe Mubangahttps://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/nuvolari-assets/blue_square_mic.jpghttps://www.spreaker.com/podcast/constitutional-integrity--6609355Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:35:34 +0000Lombe MubangaLombe Mubangafeeds@spreaker.comcleanepisodichttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/podcast-artefact--65805805 While public opinion strongly supports introducing an age ceiling, this episode evaluates whether that support translates into constitutional viability. Through analysis of Article II, Supreme Court rulings, legal doctrines such as strict scrutiny, and scholarly debates, the podcast concludes that any such age limit would violate core constitutional principles—unless implemented through the formal amendment process.
Using legal analysis and doctrinal evaluation, the episode takes listeners on a constitutional journey to explore the legal, ideological, and democratic limits of presidential eligibility]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/65805805Wed, 30 Apr 2025 11:34:40 +0000Lombe MubangaThis episode explores a provocative legal issue: should there be a maximum age limit for U.S. presidential candidates? And more importantly—could such a restriction survive constitutional scrutiny? While public opinion strongly supports introducing an... While public opinion strongly supports introducing an age ceiling, this episode evaluates whether that support translates into constitutional viability. Through analysis of Article II, Supreme Court rulings, legal doctrines such as strict scrutiny, and scholarly debates, the podcast concludes that any such age limit would violate core constitutional principles—unless implemented through the formal amendment process.
Using legal analysis and doctrinal evaluation, the episode takes listeners on a constitutional journey to explore the legal, ideological, and democratic limits of presidential eligibility]]>1080cleanfull