<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Gray Matters</title><link>https://ricochet.com/series/gray-matters/</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State, at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, supports research and debate on the modern administrative state, and the constitutional issues surrounding it. In this podcast, we’ll discuss some of the questions being debated around modern administration — some new questions, some timeless ones. And you can also get the audio from Gray Center events.<br /><br />Listen to all episodes of <a href="https://ricochet.com/series/gray-matters/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><i>Gray Matters</i></a> at <a href="https://ricochet.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Ricochet.com</b></a>.]]></description><atom:link href="https://www.spreaker.com/show/5816490/episodes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language>en</language><category>Government</category><copyright>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:owner><itunes:name>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:name><itunes:email>production@ricochet.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State, at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, supports research and debate on the modern administrative state, and the constitutional issues surrounding it. In this podcast, we’ll...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State, at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, supports research and debate on the modern administrative state, and the constitutional issues surrounding it. In this podcast, we’ll discuss some of the questions being debated around modern administration — some new questions, some timeless ones. And you can also get the audio from Gray Center events.<br /><br />Listen to all episodes of <a href="https://ricochet.com/series/gray-matters/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><i>Gray Matters</i></a> at <a href="https://ricochet.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Ricochet.com</b></a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Government"/><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><item><title>After the Slaughter, Here's What's Cooking</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/after-the-slaughter-here-s-what-s-cooking--73027777</link><description><![CDATA[<b>Adam White</b>, <b>Jace Lington</b>, and <b>Bennett Nuss</b> analyze the recent Supreme Court decisions in <i>Trump v. Slaughter</i> and <i>Trump v. Cook</i>, focusing on the implications for executive power, administrative agency independence, and the future of administrative law.<br /><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/07/after-slaughter-and-cook-future-fed-fights-and-maybe-some-midnight-firings-/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adam White in SCOTUSblog</a><br /></li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/article-ii-and-the-federal-reserve/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aditya Bamzai &amp; Aaron Nielson on the Fed and Article II at The Cornell Law Review</a><br /></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/73027777</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/73027777/gray_matters_07_17.mp3" length="55025081" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0639f235-08be-4a96-93ad-1103a623d4a1/0639f235-08be-4a96-93ad-1103a623d4a1.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0639f235-08be-4a96-93ad-1103a623d4a1/0639f235-08be-4a96-93ad-1103a623d4a1.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/0639f235-08be-4a96-93ad-1103a623d4a1/0639f235-08be-4a96-93ad-1103a623d4a1.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White, Jace Lington, and Bennett Nuss analyze the recent Supreme Court decisions in Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook, focusing on the implications for executive power, administrative agency independence, and the future of administrative law....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<b>Adam White</b>, <b>Jace Lington</b>, and <b>Bennett Nuss</b> analyze the recent Supreme Court decisions in <i>Trump v. Slaughter</i> and <i>Trump v. Cook</i>, focusing on the implications for executive power, administrative agency independence, and the future of administrative law.<br /><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/07/after-slaughter-and-cook-future-fed-fights-and-maybe-some-midnight-firings-/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adam White in SCOTUSblog</a><br /></li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/article-ii-and-the-federal-reserve/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aditya Bamzai &amp; Aaron Nielson on the Fed and Article II at The Cornell Law Review</a><br /></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3439</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Quo Vadis—Federal Trade Commission? Chief Judge Susan Braden on the Future of the FTC after Slaughter</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/quo-vadis-federal-trade-commission-chief-judge-susan-braden-on-the-future-of-the-ftc-after-slaughter--72954437</link><description><![CDATA[<b>Adam White</b> hosts Chief Judge <b>Susan G. Braden</b> (Ret.) to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in <i>Trump v. Slaughter</i>, which held the Federal Trade Commission’s statutory independence unconstitutional and explicitly overruled <i>Humphrey’s Executor</i>. Braden argues the ruling will ripple across administrative law by treating agencies with authority to file lawsuits on behalf of the United States as executive agencies subject to presidential control, and by limiting “independent” agencies to advisory roles.<br /><br />Sign up for email updates from the Gray Center <a href="https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/wo83Hjj" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a><br /><ul><li>Judge Braden's <a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/quo-vadis-federal-trade-commission/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">paper on the future of the FTC</a></li><li>Adam White's <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/07/after-slaughter-and-cook-future-fed-fights-and-maybe-some-midnight-firings-/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">analysis of Slaughter and Cook in SCOTUSblog</a></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72954437</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 19:26:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72954437/6b3aa6a7_2327_4151_a8bc_783861a107c3.mp3" length="34884045" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a25363d9-befc-4eec-ad80-96fe860f673a/a25363d9-befc-4eec-ad80-96fe860f673a.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a25363d9-befc-4eec-ad80-96fe860f673a/a25363d9-befc-4eec-ad80-96fe860f673a.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a25363d9-befc-4eec-ad80-96fe860f673a/a25363d9-befc-4eec-ad80-96fe860f673a.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White hosts Chief Judge Susan G. Braden (Ret.) to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Slaughter, which held the Federal Trade Commission’s statutory independence unconstitutional and explicitly overruled Humphrey’s Executor. Braden...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<b>Adam White</b> hosts Chief Judge <b>Susan G. Braden</b> (Ret.) to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in <i>Trump v. Slaughter</i>, which held the Federal Trade Commission’s statutory independence unconstitutional and explicitly overruled <i>Humphrey’s Executor</i>. Braden argues the ruling will ripple across administrative law by treating agencies with authority to file lawsuits on behalf of the United States as executive agencies subject to presidential control, and by limiting “independent” agencies to advisory roles.<br /><br />Sign up for email updates from the Gray Center <a href="https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/wo83Hjj" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a><br /><ul><li>Judge Braden's <a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/quo-vadis-federal-trade-commission/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">paper on the future of the FTC</a></li><li>Adam White's <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/07/after-slaughter-and-cook-future-fed-fights-and-maybe-some-midnight-firings-/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">analysis of Slaughter and Cook in SCOTUSblog</a></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2180</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>What Are the Post-Chevron Courts Doing? (Notice &amp; Comment May 2026 Conference Panel 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-are-the-post-chevron-courts-doing-notice-comment-may-2026-conference-panel-1--72762773</link><description><![CDATA[In this first panel from the Gray Center’s May conference, moderator Christopher J. Walker (University of Michigan) speaks with Megan Brown (Wiley Rein LLP), Roman Martinez (Latham &amp; Watkins LLP), and Maria Monaghan (U.S. Chamber Litigation Center) about what courts are doing after <i>Chevron</i>’s overruling in <i>Loper Bright</i>. They discuss unresolved issues now playing out in lower courts, including <i>Skidmore</i>’s role, congressional delegation and “policymaking discretion,” stare decisis for prior <i>Chevron</i>-era precedents, and implications for other deference doctrines like <i>Auer/Kisor</i>.<br /><br />Sign up for email updates from the Gray Center <a href="https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/wo83Hjj" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72762773</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 21:22:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72762773/gray_matters_6_30_2026.mp3" length="62745206" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/320362d5-3e54-44cd-a0a7-122e3a865277/320362d5-3e54-44cd-a0a7-122e3a865277.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/320362d5-3e54-44cd-a0a7-122e3a865277/320362d5-3e54-44cd-a0a7-122e3a865277.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/320362d5-3e54-44cd-a0a7-122e3a865277/320362d5-3e54-44cd-a0a7-122e3a865277.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this first panel from the Gray Center’s May conference, moderator Christopher J. Walker (University of Michigan) speaks with Megan Brown (Wiley Rein LLP), Roman Martinez (Latham &amp;amp; Watkins LLP), and Maria Monaghan (U.S. Chamber Litigation...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this first panel from the Gray Center’s May conference, moderator Christopher J. Walker (University of Michigan) speaks with Megan Brown (Wiley Rein LLP), Roman Martinez (Latham &amp; Watkins LLP), and Maria Monaghan (U.S. Chamber Litigation Center) about what courts are doing after <i>Chevron</i>’s overruling in <i>Loper Bright</i>. They discuss unresolved issues now playing out in lower courts, including <i>Skidmore</i>’s role, congressional delegation and “policymaking discretion,” stare decisis for prior <i>Chevron</i>-era precedents, and implications for other deference doctrines like <i>Auer/Kisor</i>.<br /><br />Sign up for email updates from the Gray Center <a href="https://lp.constantcontactpages.com/sl/wo83Hjj" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3922</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judging After Loper Bright</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judging-after-loper-bright--72440997</link><description><![CDATA[In this final panel from the Gray Center’s October conference, moderator Aaron Nielsen (UT Austin) speaks with Judge Naomi Rao (D.C. Circuit) and Judge Steven Menashi (Second Circuit) about their role as judges after <i>Loper Bright</i> ended <i>Chevron</i> deference. Rao and Menashi describe their interpretive approaches—text-first, but attentive to context, structure, statutory purpose, and legal terms of art—and emphasize that interpretation involves judgment. They argue<i>Loper Bright </i>largely restores courts’ independent duty to decide questions of law under the APA, while still allowing agencies discretion where statutes leave open-textured implementation choices or explicit delegations. The panel discusses D.C. Circuit practices, post–<i>Loper Bright</i> arguments about expertise, “express delegation,” <i>Skidmore</i>, forum shopping, major questions doctrine, scientific complexity, and how the debate may shift toward Article I and nondelegation.<br /><br />Sign up for email updates from the Gray Center <a href="https://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v=001qQcroV_ofWaA3u0uVslFongeXjy1yFkL1Dy2wxFXd0jb6nKOcQEMGtwREksffpqAg9HNCLo9f9ipyaRQdWLGgCU4brE5JGF0U2-k_MICgW7cTfHfi79XpEEK4mB4M5c10ReeAX2mALqeix60Uyne9oJA0mE4R3GnMMw5bAfWtLk%3D" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72440997</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:20:10 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72440997/gray_matters_6_9_2026.mp3" length="61799364" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/299a4603-7351-4250-ad27-8f7a6283347b/299a4603-7351-4250-ad27-8f7a6283347b.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/299a4603-7351-4250-ad27-8f7a6283347b/299a4603-7351-4250-ad27-8f7a6283347b.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/299a4603-7351-4250-ad27-8f7a6283347b/299a4603-7351-4250-ad27-8f7a6283347b.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this final panel from the Gray Center’s October conference, moderator Aaron Nielsen (UT Austin) speaks with Judge Naomi Rao (D.C. Circuit) and Judge Steven Menashi (Second Circuit) about their role as judges after Loper Bright ended...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this final panel from the Gray Center’s October conference, moderator Aaron Nielsen (UT Austin) speaks with Judge Naomi Rao (D.C. Circuit) and Judge Steven Menashi (Second Circuit) about their role as judges after <i>Loper Bright</i> ended <i>Chevron</i> deference. Rao and Menashi describe their interpretive approaches—text-first, but attentive to context, structure, statutory purpose, and legal terms of art—and emphasize that interpretation involves judgment. They argue<i>Loper Bright </i>largely restores courts’ independent duty to decide questions of law under the APA, while still allowing agencies discretion where statutes leave open-textured implementation choices or explicit delegations. The panel discusses D.C. Circuit practices, post–<i>Loper Bright</i> arguments about expertise, “express delegation,” <i>Skidmore</i>, forum shopping, major questions doctrine, scientific complexity, and how the debate may shift toward Article I and nondelegation.<br /><br />Sign up for email updates from the Gray Center <a href="https://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v=001qQcroV_ofWaA3u0uVslFongeXjy1yFkL1Dy2wxFXd0jb6nKOcQEMGtwREksffpqAg9HNCLo9f9ipyaRQdWLGgCU4brE5JGF0U2-k_MICgW7cTfHfi79XpEEK4mB4M5c10ReeAX2mALqeix60Uyne9oJA0mE4R3GnMMw5bAfWtLk%3D" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3863</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Antitrust Policy in a Populist Era</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/antitrust-policy-in-a-populist-era--72196243</link><description><![CDATA[The third panel discussion from the Gray Center’s Fall 2025 conference featuring:<br /><ul><li>Noah Phillips, Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore LLP</li><li>Matt Stoller, American Economic Liberties Project<br /><br /><br /></li><li>Moderator:<br />Senior Judge Douglas Ginsburg, D.C. Circuit</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72196243</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:10:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72196243/gray_matters_5_27_26.mp3" length="61164902" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1cd263f-ef46-44f9-90e2-58ff4eb74513/a1cd263f-ef46-44f9-90e2-58ff4eb74513.srt" type="application/x-subrip" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1cd263f-ef46-44f9-90e2-58ff4eb74513/a1cd263f-ef46-44f9-90e2-58ff4eb74513.txt" type="text/plain" language="en"/><podcast:transcript url="https://transcription.spreaker.com/starship/a1cd263f-ef46-44f9-90e2-58ff4eb74513/a1cd263f-ef46-44f9-90e2-58ff4eb74513.vtt" type="text/vtt" language="en"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The third panel discussion from the Gray Center’s Fall 2025 conference featuring:

- Noah Phillips, Cravath, Swaine &amp;amp; Moore LLP
- Matt Stoller, American Economic Liberties Project



- Moderator:
Senior Judge Douglas Ginsburg, D.C. Circuit</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The third panel discussion from the Gray Center’s Fall 2025 conference featuring:<br /><ul><li>Noah Phillips, Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore LLP</li><li>Matt Stoller, American Economic Liberties Project<br /><br /><br /></li><li>Moderator:<br />Senior Judge Douglas Ginsburg, D.C. Circuit</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3823</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Chad Squitieri on the President's Role in Lawmaking</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/chad-squitieri-on-the-president-s-role-in-lawmaking--71925570</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Chad Squitieri about his new paper, Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer, which focuses on the president’s role in the lawmaking process. Prof. Squittieri discusses the constitutional role of the president in lawmaking, the importance of precise definitions of Congress, and implications for judges interpreting statutes. He explores how understanding the president's involvement influences legal doctrines and the separation of powers. ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/71925570</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 11:10:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/71925570/chad_squitieri_on_the_president_s_role_in_lawmaking.mp3" length="55321204" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Chad Squitieri about his new paper, Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer, which focuses on the president’s role in the lawmaking process. Prof. Squittieri discusses the constitutional role of the president in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Chad Squitieri about his new paper, Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer, which focuses on the president’s role in the lawmaking process. Prof. Squittieri discusses the constitutional role of the president in lawmaking, the importance of precise definitions of Congress, and implications for judges interpreting statutes. He explores how understanding the president's involvement influences legal doctrines and the separation of powers. ]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3458</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>2025 State of the Administrative State Conference Panel 2: The Federal Reserve and Presidential Power</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/2025-state-of-the-administrative-state-conference-panel-2-the-federal-reserve-and-presidential-power--71503845</link><description><![CDATA[The second panel discussion from the Gray Center's Fall 2025 conference featuring: <br /><br /><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.brookings.edu/people/sarah-a-binder/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Sarah Binder</b></a><b>,</b> Brookings Institution</li><li><a href="https://law.yale.edu/jonathan-r-macey" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Jonathan Macey</b></a>, Yale Law School</li><li><a href="https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/aaron-l-nielson/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Aaron Nielson</b></a>, University of Texas<br /><br /></li><li>Moderator: <br /><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/leadership/adam-j-white/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Adam White</b></a>, C. Boyden Gray Center</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/71503845</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 21:56:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/71503845/gray_matters_4_20_2026.mp3" length="47949032" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The second panel discussion from the Gray Center's Fall 2025 conference featuring: 



- https://www.brookings.edu/people/sarah-a-binder/, Brookings Institution
- https://law.yale.edu/jonathan-r-macey, Yale Law School
-...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The second panel discussion from the Gray Center's Fall 2025 conference featuring: <br /><br /><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.brookings.edu/people/sarah-a-binder/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Sarah Binder</b></a><b>,</b> Brookings Institution</li><li><a href="https://law.yale.edu/jonathan-r-macey" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Jonathan Macey</b></a>, Yale Law School</li><li><a href="https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/aaron-l-nielson/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Aaron Nielson</b></a>, University of Texas<br /><br /></li><li>Moderator: <br /><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/leadership/adam-j-white/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><b>Adam White</b></a>, C. Boyden Gray Center</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2997</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>2025 State of the Administrative State Conference Panel 1: The State of the Administrative State</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/2025-state-of-the-administrative-state-conference-panel-1-the-state-of-the-administrative-state--70938997</link><description><![CDATA[The first panel discussion from the Gray Center's Fall 2025 conference featuring: <br /><ul><li><b>James Burnham</b>, King Street Legal, and formerly of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency<br /></li><li><b>Susan Dudley</b>, former Administrator, White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Founder &amp; Senior Scholar, GW Regulatory Studies Center; Distinguished Professor of Practice, Trachtenberg School of Public Policy &amp; Public Administration<br /></li><li><b>Lisa Heinzerling</b>, Georgetown University Law Center<br /></li><li>Moderator: <b>Mene Ukueberuwa</b>, Wall Street Journal<br /></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/70938997</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:00:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/70938997/gray_matters_3_27_2026.mp3" length="57030031" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The first panel discussion from the Gray Center's Fall 2025 conference featuring: 

- James Burnham, King Street Legal, and formerly of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency

- Susan Dudley, former Administrator, White House Office of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The first panel discussion from the Gray Center's Fall 2025 conference featuring: <br /><ul><li><b>James Burnham</b>, King Street Legal, and formerly of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency<br /></li><li><b>Susan Dudley</b>, former Administrator, White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Founder &amp; Senior Scholar, GW Regulatory Studies Center; Distinguished Professor of Practice, Trachtenberg School of Public Policy &amp; Public Administration<br /></li><li><b>Lisa Heinzerling</b>, Georgetown University Law Center<br /></li><li>Moderator: <b>Mene Ukueberuwa</b>, Wall Street Journal<br /></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3565</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Caroline Cecot on EPA Changes to Cost-Benefit Analysis</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/caroline-cecot-on-epa-changes-to-cost-benefit-analysis--70689319</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Caroline Cecot about how recent changes in the EPA's analytical methods affect transparency and environmental protection. She discusses the evolution of cost-benefit analysis from a deregulatory tool to a framework for safeguarding health and the environment, and how recent administrative moves might revert it to "arbitrary and capricious" territory. The conversation delves into critical questions about regulatory decision-making, the role of Congress, and the impact of transparency on public trust.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.theregreview.org/2026/02/05/cecot-benefit-cost-analysis-under-threat/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Benefit-Cost Analysis Under Threat</a>, Caroline Cecot, The Regulatory Review </li><li><a href="https://nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-89-number-4/rethinking-health-based-environmental-standards/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rethinking Health-Based Environmental Standards</a>, Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz, New York University Law Review </li><li><a href="https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol68/iss8/2/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Deregulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Stability</a>, Caroline Cecot, Duke Law Journal </li><li><a href="https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2026-01/combustion_turbines_eia_final_2026-01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EPA Turbine Rule</a>, January 2026 </li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/70689319</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/70689319/gray_matters_3_17_26.mp3" length="50374031" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Caroline Cecot about how recent changes in the EPA's analytical methods affect transparency and environmental protection. She discusses the evolution of cost-benefit analysis from a deregulatory tool to a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Caroline Cecot about how recent changes in the EPA's analytical methods affect transparency and environmental protection. She discusses the evolution of cost-benefit analysis from a deregulatory tool to a framework for safeguarding health and the environment, and how recent administrative moves might revert it to "arbitrary and capricious" territory. The conversation delves into critical questions about regulatory decision-making, the role of Congress, and the impact of transparency on public trust.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.theregreview.org/2026/02/05/cecot-benefit-cost-analysis-under-threat/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Benefit-Cost Analysis Under Threat</a>, Caroline Cecot, The Regulatory Review </li><li><a href="https://nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-89-number-4/rethinking-health-based-environmental-standards/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rethinking Health-Based Environmental Standards</a>, Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz, New York University Law Review </li><li><a href="https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol68/iss8/2/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Deregulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Stability</a>, Caroline Cecot, Duke Law Journal </li><li><a href="https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2026-01/combustion_turbines_eia_final_2026-01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EPA Turbine Rule</a>, January 2026 </li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3149</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>What You Might not Have Already Heard About SCOTUS on Emergency Tariffs</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-you-might-not-have-already-heard-about-scotus-on-emergency-tariffs--70366206</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Adam White about the recent Supreme Court case, exploring the nuances of statutory interpretation, the major questions doctrine, and the implications for executive and legislative powers. The Gray Center team analyzes the court's opinions, historical context, and future legal debates.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump</a></li><li><a href="https://administrativelawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/12/ALR76.4_Ramsey.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael D. Ramsey making an originalist defense of the Major Questions Doctrine</a></li><li><a href="https://americanmind.org/salvo/legal-conservatism-for-the-21st-century/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">John Ehrett's article at The American Mind about the New Right and the Major Questions Doctrine</a></li><li><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/the-whos-and-whats-of-presidential-power/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adam White on the Court's approach to presidential power</a></li><li><a href="https://americanmind.org/salvo/the-tariff-wears-two-hats-what-scotus-doesnt-understand/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">John Eastman on the tariff as an exercise of foreign policy</a></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/70366206</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 22:03:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/70366206/gray_matters_02_28_26.mp3" length="67590607" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Adam White about the recent Supreme Court case, exploring the nuances of statutory interpretation, the major questions doctrine, and the implications for executive and legislative powers. The Gray Center team...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Adam White about the recent Supreme Court case, exploring the nuances of statutory interpretation, the major questions doctrine, and the implications for executive and legislative powers. The Gray Center team analyzes the court's opinions, historical context, and future legal debates.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump</a></li><li><a href="https://administrativelawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/12/ALR76.4_Ramsey.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael D. Ramsey making an originalist defense of the Major Questions Doctrine</a></li><li><a href="https://americanmind.org/salvo/legal-conservatism-for-the-21st-century/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">John Ehrett's article at The American Mind about the New Right and the Major Questions Doctrine</a></li><li><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/the-whos-and-whats-of-presidential-power/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adam White on the Court's approach to presidential power</a></li><li><a href="https://americanmind.org/salvo/the-tariff-wears-two-hats-what-scotus-doesnt-understand/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">John Eastman on the tariff as an exercise of foreign policy</a></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4225</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Patrick McLaughlin on PLF’s Nondelegation Project</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/patrick-mclaughlin-on-plf-s-nondelegation-project--70258002</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Patrick A. McLaughlin about The Nondelegation Project at the Pacific Legal Foundation, which analyzes compliance with the nondelegation doctrine using AI and machine learning. He highlights the significant number of regulatory restrictions in the CFR, the role of vague statutes, and the importance of judicial doctrines like the intelligible principle test. The discussion also touches on the project's implications for legislative reform, state-level applications, and the challenges of data collection.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://nondelegationproject.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Nondelegation Project</a> </li><li><a href="https://pacificlegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/SR-1097-McLaughlin-and-Scacchi-Working-Paper-Introduction-to-the-Nondelegation-Project-v1-2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Introduction to the Nondelegation Project</a>, Patrick A. McLaughlin and Mitchell Scacchi </li><li><a href="https://www.quantgov.org/us-states-regdata" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">RegData project</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7805" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">26 U.S. Code § 7805</a> (Rules and regulations) </li><li><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/42" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">26 U.S. Code § 42</a> (Low-income housing credit) </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/harmonizing-delegation-and-deference-after-loper-bright/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Harmonizing Delegation and Deference After Loper Bright</a>, Kristin E. Hickman and Amy J. Wildermuth </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-virginia-model-how-the-commonwealth-built-a-best-in-class-regulatory-system/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Virginia Model: How the Commonwealth Build a Best-In-Class Regulatory System</a>, Reeve T. Bull and Patrick A. McLaughlin </li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/70258002</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 22:55:44 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/70258002/gray_matters_02_24_26.mp3" length="47822390" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Patrick A. McLaughlin about The Nondelegation Project at the Pacific Legal Foundation, which analyzes compliance with the nondelegation doctrine using AI and machine learning. He highlights the significant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Patrick A. McLaughlin about The Nondelegation Project at the Pacific Legal Foundation, which analyzes compliance with the nondelegation doctrine using AI and machine learning. He highlights the significant number of regulatory restrictions in the CFR, the role of vague statutes, and the importance of judicial doctrines like the intelligible principle test. The discussion also touches on the project's implications for legislative reform, state-level applications, and the challenges of data collection.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://nondelegationproject.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Nondelegation Project</a> </li><li><a href="https://pacificlegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/SR-1097-McLaughlin-and-Scacchi-Working-Paper-Introduction-to-the-Nondelegation-Project-v1-2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Introduction to the Nondelegation Project</a>, Patrick A. McLaughlin and Mitchell Scacchi </li><li><a href="https://www.quantgov.org/us-states-regdata" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">RegData project</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7805" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">26 U.S. Code § 7805</a> (Rules and regulations) </li><li><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/42" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">26 U.S. Code § 42</a> (Low-income housing credit) </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/harmonizing-delegation-and-deference-after-loper-bright/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Harmonizing Delegation and Deference After Loper Bright</a>, Kristin E. Hickman and Amy J. Wildermuth </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-virginia-model-how-the-commonwealth-built-a-best-in-class-regulatory-system/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Virginia Model: How the Commonwealth Build a Best-In-Class Regulatory System</a>, Reeve T. Bull and Patrick A. McLaughlin </li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2989</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Reeve Bull on Achieving Regulatory Reform in Virginia</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/reeve-bull-on-achieving-regulatory-reform-in-virginia--69813875</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with Reeve Bull about his experiences running Virginia’s Office of Regulatory Management. Bull discusses Virginia's recent regulatory reform efforts, highlighting the successful streamlining of regulations and the significant savings achieved. He emphasizes the importance of transparency in the permitting process and the need to balance regulation with economic growth. Bull addresses criticisms of deregulation, particularly concerning health and safety, and explains how Virginia's approach has focused on maintaining essential protections while reducing unnecessary burdens. The conversation also explores the integration of AI in regulatory processes and the importance of considering the impacts on local governments and small businesses.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-virginia-model-how-the-commonwealth-built-a-best-in-class-regulatory-system/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Virginia Model: How the Commonwealth Build a Best-In-Class Regulatory System</a>, Reeve T. Bull and Patrick A. McLaughlin <br /></li><li><a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/virginias-new-approach-to-regulatory-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virginia’s New Approach to Regulatory Analysis</a>, 2023 Gray Matters Episode with Andrew Wheeler and Reeve Bull <br /></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/69813875</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 17:20:10 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/69813875/gray_matters_02_05_2026.mp3" length="66236419" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington chats with Reeve Bull about his experiences running Virginia’s Office of Regulatory Management. Bull discusses Virginia's recent regulatory reform efforts, highlighting the successful streamlining of regulations and the significant...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with Reeve Bull about his experiences running Virginia’s Office of Regulatory Management. Bull discusses Virginia's recent regulatory reform efforts, highlighting the successful streamlining of regulations and the significant savings achieved. He emphasizes the importance of transparency in the permitting process and the need to balance regulation with economic growth. Bull addresses criticisms of deregulation, particularly concerning health and safety, and explains how Virginia's approach has focused on maintaining essential protections while reducing unnecessary burdens. The conversation also explores the integration of AI in regulatory processes and the importance of considering the impacts on local governments and small businesses.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-virginia-model-how-the-commonwealth-built-a-best-in-class-regulatory-system/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Virginia Model: How the Commonwealth Build a Best-In-Class Regulatory System</a>, Reeve T. Bull and Patrick A. McLaughlin <br /></li><li><a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/virginias-new-approach-to-regulatory-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Virginia’s New Approach to Regulatory Analysis</a>, 2023 Gray Matters Episode with Andrew Wheeler and Reeve Bull <br /></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4140</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Ronald J. Pestritto on Government by the Unelected</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/ronald-j-pestritto-on-government-by-the-unelected--69524725</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Hillsdale College Professor Ronald J. Pestritto about his recent article tracing the rise of the administrative state and the revolution it wrought in the federal government. Pestritto explores the evolution of the administrative state, tracing its roots back to the Progressive Era and the shift from a government based on consent to one grounded in expertise. He argues that this transformation has led to a significant disconnect between elected officials and the bureaucratic agencies that wield substantial power without direct accountability to the electorate. The conversation delves into the implications of this shift, particularly in the context of the Trump administration's attempts to rein in the administrative state and the ongoing debates surrounding judicial oversight and legislative responsibility.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://dc.claremont.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Provocations-9-Pestritto-11182025-with-Cover-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Government By the Unelected: How It Happened, and How It Might Be Tamed</a>, Ronald J. Pestritto </li><li><a href="https://americanmind.org/salvo/the-original-progressives-are-no-guide-for-todays-conservatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Original Progressives Are No Guide for Today's Conservatives</a>, Ronald J. Pestritto</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/69524725</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 22:03:57 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/69524725/gray_matters_01_20_2026.mp3" length="69835047" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Hillsdale College Professor Ronald J. Pestritto about his recent article tracing the rise of the administrative state and the revolution it wrought in the federal government. Pestritto explores the evolution of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Hillsdale College Professor Ronald J. Pestritto about his recent article tracing the rise of the administrative state and the revolution it wrought in the federal government. Pestritto explores the evolution of the administrative state, tracing its roots back to the Progressive Era and the shift from a government based on consent to one grounded in expertise. He argues that this transformation has led to a significant disconnect between elected officials and the bureaucratic agencies that wield substantial power without direct accountability to the electorate. The conversation delves into the implications of this shift, particularly in the context of the Trump administration's attempts to rein in the administrative state and the ongoing debates surrounding judicial oversight and legislative responsibility.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://dc.claremont.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Provocations-9-Pestritto-11182025-with-Cover-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Government By the Unelected: How It Happened, and How It Might Be Tamed</a>, Ronald J. Pestritto </li><li><a href="https://americanmind.org/salvo/the-original-progressives-are-no-guide-for-todays-conservatives/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Original Progressives Are No Guide for Today's Conservatives</a>, Ronald J. Pestritto</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4365</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jeffrey Pojanowski on the "Faces of Formalism"</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jeffrey-pojanowski-on-the-faces-of-formalism--69342343</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Notre Dame Law Professor Jeffery Pojanowski about his forthcoming paper, “Faces of Formalism.” The paper explores the complexities of formalism in legal interpretation, discussing its two faces: authority and method. They delve into concrete examples, such as Gorsuch's application of textualism in the Bostock case, and examine the tensions that arise between these two aspects. Pojanowski offers some ideas about how to look for authoritative answers while respecting rules meant to limit judicial discretion.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=5129167" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Faces of Formalism</a>, Jefferey Pojanowski</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/neoclassical-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Neoclassical Administrative Law</a>, Jeffrey Pojanowski</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/69342343</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 16:15:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/69342343/gray_matters_01_07_2026.mp3" length="44544754" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Notre Dame Law Professor Jeffery Pojanowski about his forthcoming paper, “Faces of Formalism.” The paper explores the complexities of formalism in legal interpretation, discussing its two faces: authority and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Notre Dame Law Professor Jeffery Pojanowski about his forthcoming paper, “Faces of Formalism.” The paper explores the complexities of formalism in legal interpretation, discussing its two faces: authority and method. They delve into concrete examples, such as Gorsuch's application of textualism in the Bostock case, and examine the tensions that arise between these two aspects. Pojanowski offers some ideas about how to look for authoritative answers while respecting rules meant to limit judicial discretion.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=5129167" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Faces of Formalism</a>, Jefferey Pojanowski</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/neoclassical-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Neoclassical Administrative Law</a>, Jeffrey Pojanowski</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2784</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Gray Center's 2025 Year in Review</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gray-center-s-2025-year-in-review--69110215</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White, Jace Lington, and Bennett Nuss reflect on the significant regulatory developments of 2025, focusing on under-reported stories in the administrative state. They discuss the future of the Federal Reserve, the evolving relationships between public and private entities, the impact of repealing disparate impact laws, and the diminishing role of Congress.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/trump-regulatory-policy-2025-compendium/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump Regulatory Policy: 2025 Compendium</a>, Bridget C.E. Dooling, Notice &amp; Comment Blog</li><li><a href="https://open.spotify.com/episode/5EnU5WRhm0U2ZmtREAFxfV?si=3ed7e80037e64f8c&amp;nd=1&amp;dlsi=ee1777ad9c394a70" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Brave New World of Administrative Law</a>, Adam White and Bennett Nuss, 2024 A Hard Look Podcast</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/69110215</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 03:02:27 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/69110215/gray_matters_12_17_2025.mp3" length="68252654" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White, Jace Lington, and Bennett Nuss reflect on the significant regulatory developments of 2025, focusing on under-reported stories in the administrative state. They discuss the future of the Federal Reserve, the evolving relationships between...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White, Jace Lington, and Bennett Nuss reflect on the significant regulatory developments of 2025, focusing on under-reported stories in the administrative state. They discuss the future of the Federal Reserve, the evolving relationships between public and private entities, the impact of repealing disparate impact laws, and the diminishing role of Congress.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/trump-regulatory-policy-2025-compendium/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump Regulatory Policy: 2025 Compendium</a>, Bridget C.E. Dooling, Notice &amp; Comment Blog</li><li><a href="https://open.spotify.com/episode/5EnU5WRhm0U2ZmtREAFxfV?si=3ed7e80037e64f8c&amp;nd=1&amp;dlsi=ee1777ad9c394a70" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Brave New World of Administrative Law</a>, Adam White and Bennett Nuss, 2024 A Hard Look Podcast</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4266</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Eli Nachmany on the Stare Decisis Effects of Loper Bright 1</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/eli-nachmany-on-the-stare-decisis-effects-of-loper-bright-1--68764748</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss discuss the implications of the <i>Loper Bright</i> decision on administrative law with guest Eli Nachmany. Eli’s forthcoming paper, “Deference Undisturbed,” examines the effects of the<i>Loper Bright</i> decision on prior cases decided under the <i>Chevron</i> framework. They discuss the open legal questions that remain after the end of <i>Chevron,</i> the role of Congress in shaping administrative law, and the future of various deference doctrines.  <br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2025-09/cato-supreme-court-review-2024-2025-4.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Vacatur as Complete Relief</a>, Eli Nachmany, Cato Supreme Court Review <br /><br /><br /></li><li><a href="https://www.wsj.com/opinion/chevron-deference-was-fun-while-it-lasted-legal-scotus-partisan-regulation-changes-bddbfe27?gaa_at=eafs&amp;gaa_n=AWEtsqeHyGoWq_X6wkbCpk0BIyvbsSqtMDaQNm18HPN2v6xhp7EuGhgoTUVP0rQPVoU%3D&amp;gaa_ts=69212def&amp;gaa_sig=v8oGTcCUZbayIzb9iazMV04_bKILAWr4_C2ykgYHSnkjVwZhGDynAjAesmkvyrvD8D6Oob1X5GseKT48CQyZbQ%3D%3D" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chevron Deference Was Fun While It Lasted</a>, Eugene Scalia, Wall Street Journal </li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/68764748</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 02:07:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/68764748/eli_nachmany_on_the_stare_decisis_effects_of_loper_bright_1.mp3" length="56064762" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss discuss the implications of the Loper Bright decision on administrative law with guest Eli Nachmany. Eli’s forthcoming paper, “Deference Undisturbed,” examines the effects of theLoper Bright decision on prior cases...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss discuss the implications of the <i>Loper Bright</i> decision on administrative law with guest Eli Nachmany. Eli’s forthcoming paper, “Deference Undisturbed,” examines the effects of the<i>Loper Bright</i> decision on prior cases decided under the <i>Chevron</i> framework. They discuss the open legal questions that remain after the end of <i>Chevron,</i> the role of Congress in shaping administrative law, and the future of various deference doctrines.  <br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2025-09/cato-supreme-court-review-2024-2025-4.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Vacatur as Complete Relief</a>, Eli Nachmany, Cato Supreme Court Review <br /><br /><br /></li><li><a href="https://www.wsj.com/opinion/chevron-deference-was-fun-while-it-lasted-legal-scotus-partisan-regulation-changes-bddbfe27?gaa_at=eafs&amp;gaa_n=AWEtsqeHyGoWq_X6wkbCpk0BIyvbsSqtMDaQNm18HPN2v6xhp7EuGhgoTUVP0rQPVoU%3D&amp;gaa_ts=69212def&amp;gaa_sig=v8oGTcCUZbayIzb9iazMV04_bKILAWr4_C2ykgYHSnkjVwZhGDynAjAesmkvyrvD8D6Oob1X5GseKT48CQyZbQ%3D%3D" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chevron Deference Was Fun While It Lasted</a>, Eugene Scalia, Wall Street Journal </li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3504</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tanner Jones on How Vulcan Technologies Uses AI to Revolutionize Regulation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tanner-jones-on-how-vulcan-technologies-uses-ai-to-revolutionize-regulation--68668318</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with Vulcan Technologies CEO Tanner Jones about how his company uses AI to help agencies, lawmakers, and businesses navigate the complex world of administrative law. They discuss whether AI systems will replace the industry and government consultants who usually guide people through the layers of law, regulation, and court precedent that affect our world. <br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://vulcan-tech.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Vulcan Technologies Website</a> </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4877821" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Restoring Legislative Authority: A Balanced Approach to Agency Deference</a>, Jonathan Wolfson and Tanner Jones Deference article </li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/68668318</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 02:31:09 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/68668318/gray_matters_11_20_2025.mp3" length="21044580" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington chats with Vulcan Technologies CEO Tanner Jones about how his company uses AI to help agencies, lawmakers, and businesses navigate the complex world of administrative law. They discuss whether AI systems will replace the industry and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with Vulcan Technologies CEO Tanner Jones about how his company uses AI to help agencies, lawmakers, and businesses navigate the complex world of administrative law. They discuss whether AI systems will replace the industry and government consultants who usually guide people through the layers of law, regulation, and court precedent that affect our world. <br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://vulcan-tech.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Vulcan Technologies Website</a> </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4877821" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Restoring Legislative Authority: A Balanced Approach to Agency Deference</a>, Jonathan Wolfson and Tanner Jones Deference article </li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1316</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>John Vecchione on What the Constitution Says About Presidents and Tariffs</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/john-vecchione-on-what-the-constitution-says-about-presidents-and-tariffs--68404860</link><description><![CDATA[Bennett Nuss chats with New Civil Liberties Alliance Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione about the tariff case pending before the Supreme Court, <i>Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump</i>. They discuss the main arguments about the extent of the president’s power over tariff policy and what the court might decide.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5248828-trumps-tariffs-are-unconstitutional-and-were-suing-to-end-them/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump’s tariffs are unconstitutional—we’re suing to end them</a>, John J. Vecchione and Andrew J. Morris </li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/380638/20251024173104424_Brief%20Amici%20Curiae%20of%20New%20Civil%20Liberties%20Alliance%20et%20al%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NCLA’s amicus brief in the </a><i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/380638/20251024173104424_Brief%20Amici%20Curiae%20of%20New%20Civil%20Liberties%20Alliance%20et%20al%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources</a></i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/380638/20251024173104424_Brief%20Amici%20Curiae%20of%20New%20Civil%20Liberties%20Alliance%20et%20al%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> case</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/383153/20251030180246101_24-1287rb_Govt_Tariffs_reply-final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">President Donald Trump’s reply brief in the </a><i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/383153/20251030180246101_24-1287rb_Govt_Tariffs_reply-final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources</a></i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/383153/20251030180246101_24-1287rb_Govt_Tariffs_reply-final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> case</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375589/20250923100530992_24-1287%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Professor%20Chad%20Squitieri.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prof. Chad Squitieri’s amicus brief in the </a><i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375589/20250923100530992_24-1287%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Professor%20Chad%20Squitieri.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources</a></i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375589/20250923100530992_24-1287%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Professor%20Chad%20Squitieri.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> case</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375663/20250923175714172_Tariff%20brief%20formatted.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prof. Aditya Bamzai’s amicus brief in the </a><i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375663/20250923175714172_Tariff%20brief%20formatted.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources</a></i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375663/20250923175714172_Tariff%20brief%20formatted.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> case</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/president-trumps-tariffs-v-the-supreme-courts-duties/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adam White at SCOTUSblog on the </a><i><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/president-trumps-tariffs-v-the-supreme-courts-duties/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning</a></i><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/president-trumps-tariffs-v-the-supreme-courts-duties/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Resources case</a> <br /><br /></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/68404860</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 23:01:10 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/68404860/john_vecchione_on_what_the_constitution_says_about_presidents_and_tariffs.mp3" length="42333144" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Bennett Nuss chats with New Civil Liberties Alliance Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione about the tariff case pending before the Supreme Court, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump. They discuss the main arguments about the extent of the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Bennett Nuss chats with New Civil Liberties Alliance Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione about the tariff case pending before the Supreme Court, <i>Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump</i>. They discuss the main arguments about the extent of the president’s power over tariff policy and what the court might decide.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5248828-trumps-tariffs-are-unconstitutional-and-were-suing-to-end-them/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Trump’s tariffs are unconstitutional—we’re suing to end them</a>, John J. Vecchione and Andrew J. Morris </li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/380638/20251024173104424_Brief%20Amici%20Curiae%20of%20New%20Civil%20Liberties%20Alliance%20et%20al%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NCLA’s amicus brief in the </a><i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/380638/20251024173104424_Brief%20Amici%20Curiae%20of%20New%20Civil%20Liberties%20Alliance%20et%20al%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources</a></i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/380638/20251024173104424_Brief%20Amici%20Curiae%20of%20New%20Civil%20Liberties%20Alliance%20et%20al%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> case</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/383153/20251030180246101_24-1287rb_Govt_Tariffs_reply-final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">President Donald Trump’s reply brief in the </a><i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/383153/20251030180246101_24-1287rb_Govt_Tariffs_reply-final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources</a></i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/383153/20251030180246101_24-1287rb_Govt_Tariffs_reply-final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> case</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375589/20250923100530992_24-1287%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Professor%20Chad%20Squitieri.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prof. Chad Squitieri’s amicus brief in the </a><i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375589/20250923100530992_24-1287%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Professor%20Chad%20Squitieri.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources</a></i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375589/20250923100530992_24-1287%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Professor%20Chad%20Squitieri.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> case</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375663/20250923175714172_Tariff%20brief%20formatted.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prof. Aditya Bamzai’s amicus brief in the </a><i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375663/20250923175714172_Tariff%20brief%20formatted.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning Resources</a></i><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1287/375663/20250923175714172_Tariff%20brief%20formatted.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> case</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/president-trumps-tariffs-v-the-supreme-courts-duties/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adam White at SCOTUSblog on the </a><i><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/president-trumps-tariffs-v-the-supreme-courts-duties/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Learning</a></i><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/11/president-trumps-tariffs-v-the-supreme-courts-duties/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Resources case</a> <br /><br /></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2646</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Christopher J. Walker on Congress and the Shifting Sands in Administrative Law</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/christopher-j-walker-on-congress-and-the-shifting-sands-in-administrative-law--68093157</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with University of Michigan Law Professor Christopher J. Walker about how to reinvigorate Congress in light of the changing administrative law landscape. They discuss his recent article, <i>Congress and the Shifting Sands in Administrative Law</i>, and his ideas about how Congress can play a larger role in federal policymaking.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/congress-and-the-shifting-sands-in-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress and the Shifting Sands in Administrative Law</a>, Christopher J. Walker </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/delegation-and-time/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Delegation and Time</a>, Jonathan H. Adler &amp; Christopher J. Walker </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nielson-Walker-Congress-Anti-Removal-Power.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress’s Anti-Removal Power</a>, Aaron L. Nielson &amp; Christopher J. Walker </li><li><a href="https://www.schmitt.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Post-Chevron-Working-Group-Report-V2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Post-Chevron Working Group Report</a>, Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) </li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/68093157</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 17:39:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/68093157/gray_matters_10_10_2025.mp3" length="40825335" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington chats with University of Michigan Law Professor Christopher J. Walker about how to reinvigorate Congress in light of the changing administrative law landscape. They discuss his recent article, Congress and the Shifting Sands in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with University of Michigan Law Professor Christopher J. Walker about how to reinvigorate Congress in light of the changing administrative law landscape. They discuss his recent article, <i>Congress and the Shifting Sands in Administrative Law</i>, and his ideas about how Congress can play a larger role in federal policymaking.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/congress-and-the-shifting-sands-in-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress and the Shifting Sands in Administrative Law</a>, Christopher J. Walker </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/delegation-and-time/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Delegation and Time</a>, Jonathan H. Adler &amp; Christopher J. Walker </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nielson-Walker-Congress-Anti-Removal-Power.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress’s Anti-Removal Power</a>, Aaron L. Nielson &amp; Christopher J. Walker </li><li><a href="https://www.schmitt.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Post-Chevron-Working-Group-Report-V2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Post-Chevron Working Group Report</a>, Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) </li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2552</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Daniel Kelly on Jarkesy and the End of Political Adjudication</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/daniel-kelly-on-jarkesy-and-the-end-of-political-adjudication--67648002</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly about what the Constitution says regarding who may exercise the judicial power. They discuss his new Gray Center policy brief, <i>Jarkesy</i> and the End of Political Adjudication, and his argument that the Supreme Court should go further and hold that the Constitution requires many trials now handled by agency adjudicators to take place in the proper forum—an Article III court. <br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><i><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/2025/08/jarkesy-and-the-end-of-political-adjudication/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jarkesy</a></i><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/2025/08/jarkesy-and-the-end-of-political-adjudication/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> and the End of Political Adjudication</a>, Daniel Kelly</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/67648002</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 20:27:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/67648002/gray_matters_9_5_25.mp3" length="63993232" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington chats with former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly about what the Constitution says regarding who may exercise the judicial power. They discuss his new Gray Center policy brief, Jarkesy and the End of Political Adjudication,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly about what the Constitution says regarding who may exercise the judicial power. They discuss his new Gray Center policy brief, <i>Jarkesy</i> and the End of Political Adjudication, and his argument that the Supreme Court should go further and hold that the Constitution requires many trials now handled by agency adjudicators to take place in the proper forum—an Article III court. <br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><i><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/2025/08/jarkesy-and-the-end-of-political-adjudication/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jarkesy</a></i><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/2025/08/jarkesy-and-the-end-of-political-adjudication/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> and the End of Political Adjudication</a>, Daniel Kelly</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4000</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Beau Baumann on the History of Legislative Constitutionalism</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/beau-baumann-on-the-history-of-legislative-constitutionalism--62093687</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Beau J. Baumann about his historical research into the Offices of Legislative Counsel. They discuss his forthcoming paper, Resurrecting the Trinity of Legislative Constitutionalism, and how Progressive reformers at the turn of the twentieth century built institutions to arrest congressional decline.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><b></b><br /><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4933206" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Resurrecting the Trinity of Legislative Constitutionalism</a>, Beau J. Baumann <br /><br /><a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/how-chief-justice-taft-wrote-the-famous-myers-opinion-with-robert-post/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Chief Justice Taft Wrote the Famous Myers Opinion, with Robert Post</a>, Gray Matters <br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/62093687</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 17:11:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/62093687/gray_matters_09_24_2024.mp3" length="50763987" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Beau J. Baumann about his historical research into the Offices of Legislative Counsel. They discuss his forthcoming paper, Resurrecting the Trinity of Legislative Constitutionalism, and how Progressive reformers...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Beau J. Baumann about his historical research into the Offices of Legislative Counsel. They discuss his forthcoming paper, Resurrecting the Trinity of Legislative Constitutionalism, and how Progressive reformers at the turn of the twentieth century built institutions to arrest congressional decline.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><b></b><br /><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4933206" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Resurrecting the Trinity of Legislative Constitutionalism</a>, Beau J. Baumann <br /><br /><a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/how-chief-justice-taft-wrote-the-famous-myers-opinion-with-robert-post/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">How Chief Justice Taft Wrote the Famous Myers Opinion, with Robert Post</a>, Gray Matters <br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3173</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jennifer Mascott on the Appointments Clause and Special Counsel Jack Smith</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jennifer-mascott-on-the-appointments-clause-and-special-counsel-jack-smith--60701047</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with Jenn Mascott about Judge Aileen Cannon's decision to dismiss the classified documents case against Donald Trump. They discuss the Appointments Clause and the broader context of the debate surrounding the special counsel investigation of the former president.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24810933/cannon.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Judge Aileen Cannon's decision in US v. Trump</a><br /></li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Justice Thomas's concurring opinion in Trump v. US</a><br /></li><li><a href="https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/officers-united-states/#:~:text=Jennifer%20L.,Mascott%20*&amp;text=For%20decades%20courts%20have%20believed,to%20major%20categories%20of%20officials." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jenn Mascott's Stanford Law Review article on the Appointments Clause</a><br /></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/60701047</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:01:52 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/60701047/gray_matters_07_15_2024.mp3" length="31209348" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington chats with Jenn Mascott about Judge Aileen Cannon's decision to dismiss the classified documents case against Donald Trump. They discuss the Appointments Clause and the broader context of the debate surrounding the special counsel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with Jenn Mascott about Judge Aileen Cannon's decision to dismiss the classified documents case against Donald Trump. They discuss the Appointments Clause and the broader context of the debate surrounding the special counsel investigation of the former president.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24810933/cannon.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Judge Aileen Cannon's decision in US v. Trump</a><br /></li><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Justice Thomas's concurring opinion in Trump v. US</a><br /></li><li><a href="https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/officers-united-states/#:~:text=Jennifer%20L.,Mascott%20*&amp;text=For%20decades%20courts%20have%20believed,to%20major%20categories%20of%20officials." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jenn Mascott's Stanford Law Review article on the Appointments Clause</a><br /></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1951</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>A Debate on The Right—Climate Lawsuits and Federalism: What Is the Role of State Tort Law?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-debate-on-the-right-climate-lawsuits-and-federalism-what-is-the-role-of-state-tort-law--60066567</link><description><![CDATA[This is a rebroadcast of a panel discussion from an event we co-hosted on May 15, 2024, with the Manhattan Institute and the Federalist Society. The panelists discuss whether state tort law is an appropriate tool for addressing climate change and the petition for certiorari in Sunoco LP, et al. v. City and County of Honolulu.<br /><br />Featured Speakers:<br /><ul><li>Jonathan Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law</li><li>James Copland, Senior Fellow and Director of Legal Policy, Manhattan Institute</li><li>Donald Kochan, Antonin Scalia Law School</li><li>Jennifer Mascott, C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/60066567</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 13:45:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/60066567/gray_matters_5_16.mp3" length="65307295" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This is a rebroadcast of a panel discussion from an event we co-hosted on May 15, 2024, with the Manhattan Institute and the Federalist Society. The panelists discuss whether state tort law is an appropriate tool for addressing climate change and the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This is a rebroadcast of a panel discussion from an event we co-hosted on May 15, 2024, with the Manhattan Institute and the Federalist Society. The panelists discuss whether state tort law is an appropriate tool for addressing climate change and the petition for certiorari in Sunoco LP, et al. v. City and County of Honolulu.<br /><br />Featured Speakers:<br /><ul><li>Jonathan Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law</li><li>James Copland, Senior Fellow and Director of Legal Policy, Manhattan Institute</li><li>Donald Kochan, Antonin Scalia Law School</li><li>Jennifer Mascott, C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4082</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Federal Preemption and Environmental Regulation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/federal-preemption-and-environmental-regulation--59804837</link><description><![CDATA[This is a rebroadcast of the Gray Center's Federal Preemption and Environmental Regulation Webinar. We hosted this event on April 29, 2024, to discuss the issues involved in two pending cases where energy companies have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the Clean Air Act preempts attempts by Honolulu, Hawaii, to redress certain climate change-related alleged injuries. <br /><br />Featured Speakers:<br /><ul><li>Jonathan Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law</li><li>Richard Epstein, New York University</li><li>Edmund LaCour, Solicitor General of Alabama</li><li>Jennifer Mascott, C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State</li><li>Adam White, C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State </li></ul><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4K33QiNUZwU" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video of the Webinar</a></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/59804837</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 21:35:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/59804837/gray_matters_5_03.mp3" length="83371492" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This is a rebroadcast of the Gray Center's Federal Preemption and Environmental Regulation Webinar. We hosted this event on April 29, 2024, to discuss the issues involved in two pending cases where energy companies have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This is a rebroadcast of the Gray Center's Federal Preemption and Environmental Regulation Webinar. We hosted this event on April 29, 2024, to discuss the issues involved in two pending cases where energy companies have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the Clean Air Act preempts attempts by Honolulu, Hawaii, to redress certain climate change-related alleged injuries. <br /><br />Featured Speakers:<br /><ul><li>Jonathan Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law</li><li>Richard Epstein, New York University</li><li>Edmund LaCour, Solicitor General of Alabama</li><li>Jennifer Mascott, C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State</li><li>Adam White, C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State </li></ul><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4K33QiNUZwU" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video of the Webinar</a></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5211</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Paul Ray's Critique of the Expertise Rationale for Chevron Deference</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/paul-ray-s-critique-of-the-expertise-rationale-for-chevron-deference--58973761</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with former OIRA Administrator Paul J. Ray about his new paper, “Lover, Mystic, Bureaucrat, Judge: The Communication of Expertise and the Deference Doctrines.” In the paper, Mr. Ray critiques the expertise rationale for Chevron deference, arguing that agency employees can share much of the special knowledge they use to make decisions with reviewing courts. <br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/lover-mystic-bureaucrat-judge-the-communication-of-expertise-and-the-deference-doctrines/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lover, Mystic, Bureaucrat, Judge: The Communication of Expertise and the Deference Doctrines</a>, Paul J. Ray </li><li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHI_04m7PMo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Keynote Address and Fireside Chat</a>, October 2023, Chevron on Trial: The Supreme Court and the Future of Agency Authority and Expertise </li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58973761</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 18:34:13 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58973761/gray_matters_3_8.mp3" length="45451308" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with former OIRA Administrator Paul J. Ray about his new paper, “Lover, Mystic, Bureaucrat, Judge: The Communication of Expertise and the Deference Doctrines.” In the paper, Mr. Ray critiques the expertise rationale...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with former OIRA Administrator Paul J. Ray about his new paper, “Lover, Mystic, Bureaucrat, Judge: The Communication of Expertise and the Deference Doctrines.” In the paper, Mr. Ray critiques the expertise rationale for Chevron deference, arguing that agency employees can share much of the special knowledge they use to make decisions with reviewing courts. <br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/lover-mystic-bureaucrat-judge-the-communication-of-expertise-and-the-deference-doctrines/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lover, Mystic, Bureaucrat, Judge: The Communication of Expertise and the Deference Doctrines</a>, Paul J. Ray </li><li><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHI_04m7PMo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Keynote Address and Fireside Chat</a>, October 2023, Chevron on Trial: The Supreme Court and the Future of Agency Authority and Expertise </li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2841</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Equity and the Administrative State</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/equity-and-the-administrative-state--58891362</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the Georgetown Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy recently hosted a series of webinars ahead of a forthcoming symposium on Equity and the Administrative State. <br /><br />This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion from February 23, 2024, about affirmative action and other ways regulators pursue equity through the administrative state featuring Ming Chen, Jesse Merriam, and Bijal Shah, moderated by Kmele Foster.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><a href="https://youtu.be/GXhuvzNuuDU" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video of the Webinar</a><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58891362</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 18:03:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58891362/gray_matters_3_1.mp3" length="85579152" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the Georgetown Journal of Law &amp;amp; Public Policy recently hosted a series of webinars ahead of a forthcoming symposium on Equity and the Administrative State. 

This episode of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the Georgetown Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy recently hosted a series of webinars ahead of a forthcoming symposium on Equity and the Administrative State. <br /><br />This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion from February 23, 2024, about affirmative action and other ways regulators pursue equity through the administrative state featuring Ming Chen, Jesse Merriam, and Bijal Shah, moderated by Kmele Foster.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><a href="https://youtu.be/GXhuvzNuuDU" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video of the Webinar</a><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5349</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Racial Classifications and Democratic Institutions</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/racial-classifications-and-democratic-institutions--58800158</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the Georgetown Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy recently hosted a series of webinars ahead of a forthcoming symposium on Equity and the Administrative State. <br /><br />This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion about the use of racial classifications to make public policy and how race has affected the character of American institutions featuring David Bernstein, Jonathan Berry, and Joy Milligan, moderated by Renée Landers. <br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li>Watch a <a href="https://share.descript.com/view/ymdEdxmndnM" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">video of the discussion</a><br /></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58800158</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:31:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58800158/gray_matters_2_23.mp3" length="87628406" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the Georgetown Journal of Law &amp;amp; Public Policy recently hosted a series of webinars ahead of a forthcoming symposium on Equity and the Administrative State. 

This episode of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the Georgetown Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy recently hosted a series of webinars ahead of a forthcoming symposium on Equity and the Administrative State. <br /><br />This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion about the use of racial classifications to make public policy and how race has affected the character of American institutions featuring David Bernstein, Jonathan Berry, and Joy Milligan, moderated by Renée Landers. <br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li>Watch a <a href="https://share.descript.com/view/ymdEdxmndnM" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">video of the discussion</a><br /></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5477</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Disney v. Democracy</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/disney-v-democracy--58710221</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with Scalia Law Professor Donald J. Kochan about Florida and Disney. They discuss his recent paper applying public choice theory to Florida’s Reedy Creek Improvement Act of 1967 and why the special treatment Disney received from the state is not a good model for state and local regulation.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4698563" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Disney v. Democracy? A Public Choice and Good Governance Analysis of Florida’s Reedy Creek Improvement Act of 1967 and Its Resulting Regime</a>, Donald J. Kochan <br /></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58710221</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:54:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58710221/gray_matters_2_16.mp3" length="56078338" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington chats with Scalia Law Professor Donald J. Kochan about Florida and Disney. They discuss his recent paper applying public choice theory to Florida’s Reedy Creek Improvement Act of 1967 and why the special treatment Disney received from the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington chats with Scalia Law Professor Donald J. Kochan about Florida and Disney. They discuss his recent paper applying public choice theory to Florida’s Reedy Creek Improvement Act of 1967 and why the special treatment Disney received from the state is not a good model for state and local regulation.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4698563" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Disney v. Democracy? A Public Choice and Good Governance Analysis of Florida’s Reedy Creek Improvement Act of 1967 and Its Resulting Regime</a>, Donald J. Kochan <br /></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3505</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Jed Shugerman's Major Questions About Emergency Powers and Standing</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/jed-shugerman-s-major-questions-about-emergency-powers-and-standing--58626256</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Law Professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman about lingering issues following the Supreme Court’s decision in the <i>Biden v. Nebraska</i> student loan case. They discuss a recent paper Shugerman presented at a Gray Center research roundtable, “Biden v. Nebraska: The New State Standing and the (Old) Purposive Major Questions Doctrine.”<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/biden-v-nebraska-the-new-state-standing-and-the-old-purposive-major-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Biden v. Nebraska: The New State Standing and the (Old) Purposive Major Questions Doctrine</a>, Jed Handelsman Shugerman </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4531721" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Major Questions About Presidentialism: Untangling the “Chain of Dependence” Across Administrative Law</a>, Jed Handelsman Shugerman and Jodi L. Short </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/standing-without-injury/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Standing Without Injury</a>, Jonathan H. Adler</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/an-originalist-defense-of-the-major-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">An Originalist Defense of the Major Questions Doctrine,</a> Michael D. Ramsey </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4437332" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine: Right Diagnosis, Wrong Remedy</a>, Thomas W. Merrill </li><li><a href="https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4401&amp;context=faculty_scholarship" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Ghosts of Chevron Present and Future</a>, Gary S. Lawson </li><li><a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-16/my-colleague-steve-williams-bbpt4-c56nl-px3t8-bf7gd-pyjsj-9bc38-2zf3c-wy82l-9nejc-gdazh-ma64r-bzser-23cs8-3e4yl-lz96b-xwkse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Answers Doctrine</a>, Lisa Heinzerling </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-new-purpose-and-intent-in-major-questions-cases/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The New Purpose and Intent in Major Questions Cases</a>, Anita S. Krishnakumar </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-major-questions-doctrine-unfounded-unbounded-and-confounded/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine: Unfounded, Unbounded, and Confounded</a>, Ronald M. Levin </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-minor-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Minor Questions Doctrine</a>, Aaron L. Nielson </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-major-questions-doctrine-outside-chevrons-domain/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine Outside Chevron‘s Domain</a>, Adam R.F. Gustafson </li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58626256</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 18:50:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58626256/gray_matters_2_9.mp3" length="60397529" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Law Professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman about lingering issues following the Supreme Court’s decision in the Biden v. Nebraska student loan case. They discuss a recent paper Shugerman presented at a Gray Center...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Law Professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman about lingering issues following the Supreme Court’s decision in the <i>Biden v. Nebraska</i> student loan case. They discuss a recent paper Shugerman presented at a Gray Center research roundtable, “Biden v. Nebraska: The New State Standing and the (Old) Purposive Major Questions Doctrine.”<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/biden-v-nebraska-the-new-state-standing-and-the-old-purposive-major-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Biden v. Nebraska: The New State Standing and the (Old) Purposive Major Questions Doctrine</a>, Jed Handelsman Shugerman </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4531721" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Major Questions About Presidentialism: Untangling the “Chain of Dependence” Across Administrative Law</a>, Jed Handelsman Shugerman and Jodi L. Short </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/standing-without-injury/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Standing Without Injury</a>, Jonathan H. Adler</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/an-originalist-defense-of-the-major-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">An Originalist Defense of the Major Questions Doctrine,</a> Michael D. Ramsey </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4437332" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine: Right Diagnosis, Wrong Remedy</a>, Thomas W. Merrill </li><li><a href="https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4401&amp;context=faculty_scholarship" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Ghosts of Chevron Present and Future</a>, Gary S. Lawson </li><li><a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-16/my-colleague-steve-williams-bbpt4-c56nl-px3t8-bf7gd-pyjsj-9bc38-2zf3c-wy82l-9nejc-gdazh-ma64r-bzser-23cs8-3e4yl-lz96b-xwkse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Answers Doctrine</a>, Lisa Heinzerling </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-new-purpose-and-intent-in-major-questions-cases/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The New Purpose and Intent in Major Questions Cases</a>, Anita S. Krishnakumar </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-major-questions-doctrine-unfounded-unbounded-and-confounded/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine: Unfounded, Unbounded, and Confounded</a>, Ronald M. Levin </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-minor-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Minor Questions Doctrine</a>, Aaron L. Nielson </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-major-questions-doctrine-outside-chevrons-domain/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine Outside Chevron‘s Domain</a>, Adam R.F. Gustafson </li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3775</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Michael Ramsey’s Originalist Defense of the Major Questions Doctrine</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/michael-ramsey-s-originalist-defense-of-the-major-questions-doctrine--58537445</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Law Professor Michael D. Ramsey about how originalists can defend the major questions doctrine as a substantive canon of interpretation. He examines post-ratification court practice and other substantive canons designed by judges to minimize the harms of judicial error when interpreting ambiguous statutes. Ramsey recently presented a paper on this subject at a Gray Center research roundtable.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/an-originalist-defense-of-the-major-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">An Originalist Defense of the Major Questions Doctrine,</a> Michael D. Ramsey </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4437332" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine: Right Diagnosis, Wrong Remedy</a>, Thomas W. Merrill </li><li><a href="https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4401&amp;context=faculty_scholarship" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Ghosts of Chevron Present and Future</a>, Gary S. Lawson </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/biden-v-nebraska-the-new-state-standing-and-the-old-purposive-major-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Biden v. Nebraska: The New State Standing and the (Old) Purposive Major Questions Doctrine</a>, Jed Handelsman Shugerman </li><li><a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-16/my-colleague-steve-williams-bbpt4-c56nl-px3t8-bf7gd-pyjsj-9bc38-2zf3c-wy82l-9nejc-gdazh-ma64r-bzser-23cs8-3e4yl-lz96b-xwkse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Answers Doctrine</a>, Lisa Heinzerling </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-new-purpose-and-intent-in-major-questions-cases/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The New Purpose and Intent in Major Questions Cases</a>, Anita S. Krishnakumar </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-major-questions-doctrine-unfounded-unbounded-and-confounded/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine: Unfounded, Unbounded, and Confounded</a>, Ronald M. Levin </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-minor-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Minor Questions Doctrine</a>, Aaron L. Nielson </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-major-questions-doctrine-outside-chevrons-domain/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine Outside Chevron‘s Domain</a>, Adam R.F. Gustafson</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58537445</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58537445/gray_matters_2_02.mp3" length="50771510" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Law Professor Michael D. Ramsey about how originalists can defend the major questions doctrine as a substantive canon of interpretation. He examines post-ratification court practice and other substantive canons...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Law Professor Michael D. Ramsey about how originalists can defend the major questions doctrine as a substantive canon of interpretation. He examines post-ratification court practice and other substantive canons designed by judges to minimize the harms of judicial error when interpreting ambiguous statutes. Ramsey recently presented a paper on this subject at a Gray Center research roundtable.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/an-originalist-defense-of-the-major-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">An Originalist Defense of the Major Questions Doctrine,</a> Michael D. Ramsey </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4437332" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine: Right Diagnosis, Wrong Remedy</a>, Thomas W. Merrill </li><li><a href="https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4401&amp;context=faculty_scholarship" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Ghosts of Chevron Present and Future</a>, Gary S. Lawson </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/biden-v-nebraska-the-new-state-standing-and-the-old-purposive-major-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Biden v. Nebraska: The New State Standing and the (Old) Purposive Major Questions Doctrine</a>, Jed Handelsman Shugerman </li><li><a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-16/my-colleague-steve-williams-bbpt4-c56nl-px3t8-bf7gd-pyjsj-9bc38-2zf3c-wy82l-9nejc-gdazh-ma64r-bzser-23cs8-3e4yl-lz96b-xwkse" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Answers Doctrine</a>, Lisa Heinzerling </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-new-purpose-and-intent-in-major-questions-cases/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The New Purpose and Intent in Major Questions Cases</a>, Anita S. Krishnakumar </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-major-questions-doctrine-unfounded-unbounded-and-confounded/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine: Unfounded, Unbounded, and Confounded</a>, Ronald M. Levin </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-minor-questions-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Minor Questions Doctrine</a>, Aaron L. Nielson </li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/the-major-questions-doctrine-outside-chevrons-domain/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Major Questions Doctrine Outside Chevron‘s Domain</a>, Adam R.F. Gustafson</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3173</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Fixing Deference with Ronald A. Cass</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/fixing-deference-with-ronald-a-cass--58456711</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Ronald A. Cass about the future of judicial deference to agency actions. They discuss Cass’s recent papers, “Fixing Deference: Delegation, Discretion, and Deference Under Separated Powers,” published by the <i>New York University Journal of Law &amp; Liberty</i>, and “Getting Deference Right,” published by <i>National Affairs</i>. Ron insists on the crucial distinction between court decisions on what the law means and agency decisions about policy implementation.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-17/fixing-deference" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fixing Deference: Delegation, Discretion, and Deference Under Separated Powers</a> (NYU JLL, 2023) </li><li><a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/getting-deference-right" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Getting Deference Right</a> (National Affairs, 2024) </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4527109" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Loper Bright Amicus Brief</a>, Gray Center Separation of Powers Clinic </li><li><a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-16/category/Volume+16+-+No.+3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gray Center 2023 Rule of Law Symposium</a> </li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58456711</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:00:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58456711/gray_matters_01_26.mp3" length="56339563" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Ronald A. Cass about the future of judicial deference to agency actions. They discuss Cass’s recent papers, “Fixing Deference: Delegation, Discretion, and Deference Under Separated Powers,” published by the New...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Ronald A. Cass about the future of judicial deference to agency actions. They discuss Cass’s recent papers, “Fixing Deference: Delegation, Discretion, and Deference Under Separated Powers,” published by the <i>New York University Journal of Law &amp; Liberty</i>, and “Getting Deference Right,” published by <i>National Affairs</i>. Ron insists on the crucial distinction between court decisions on what the law means and agency decisions about policy implementation.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-17/fixing-deference" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fixing Deference: Delegation, Discretion, and Deference Under Separated Powers</a> (NYU JLL, 2023) </li><li><a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/getting-deference-right" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Getting Deference Right</a> (National Affairs, 2024) </li><li><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4527109" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Loper Bright Amicus Brief</a>, Gray Center Separation of Powers Clinic </li><li><a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-16/category/Volume+16+-+No.+3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gray Center 2023 Rule of Law Symposium</a> </li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3521</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Future of Financial Regulation Panel 2: What Should Regulate the Financial Regulators?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-future-of-financial-regulation-panel-2-what-should-regulate-the-financial-regulators--58059928</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, the Mercatus Center, and the <i>Journal of Law, Economics &amp; Policy</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of financial regulation. <br /><br />This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring law professors Bridget C.E. Dooling and Kristin E. Hickman along with former OIRA Administrator Paul J. Ray and AEI Senior Fellow Emeritus Peter Wallison, moderated by Gray Center Co-Executive Director Adam White. <br /><br />They discuss OIRA oversight of financial regulators and how to reform federal financial regulations.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/event/the-future-of-financial-regulation-symposium/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Videos from the conference</a></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58059928</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:38:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58059928/gray_matters_12_19.mp3" length="71219328" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, the Mercatus Center, and the Journal of Law, Economics &amp;amp; Policy recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of financial regulation. 

This episode of Gray Matters is a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, the Mercatus Center, and the <i>Journal of Law, Economics &amp; Policy</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of financial regulation. <br /><br />This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring law professors Bridget C.E. Dooling and Kristin E. Hickman along with former OIRA Administrator Paul J. Ray and AEI Senior Fellow Emeritus Peter Wallison, moderated by Gray Center Co-Executive Director Adam White. <br /><br />They discuss OIRA oversight of financial regulators and how to reform federal financial regulations.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/event/the-future-of-financial-regulation-symposium/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Videos from the conference</a></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4451</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Future of Financial Regulation Panel 1: What is the Future of Financial Regulation?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-future-of-financial-regulation-panel-1-what-is-the-future-of-financial-regulation--58024343</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, the Mercatus Center, and the <i>Journal of Law, Economics &amp; Policy</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of financial regulation. This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring the Hoover Institution's John H. Cochrane and professors Kathryn Judge, Jonathan R. Macey, and Todd J. Zywicki, moderated by Scalia Law professor Paolo Saguato. They discuss banking regulation, consumer finance, and what might be coming next in the world of financial regulation.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/event/the-future-of-financial-regulation-symposium/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Videos from the conference</a></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/58024343</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2023 02:08:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/58024343/gray_matters_12_15.mp3" length="84897461" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, the Mercatus Center, and the Journal of Law, Economics &amp;amp; Policy recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of financial regulation. This episode of Gray Matters is a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, the Mercatus Center, and the <i>Journal of Law, Economics &amp; Policy</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of financial regulation. This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring the Hoover Institution's John H. Cochrane and professors Kathryn Judge, Jonathan R. Macey, and Todd J. Zywicki, moderated by Scalia Law professor Paolo Saguato. They discuss banking regulation, consumer finance, and what might be coming next in the world of financial regulation.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/event/the-future-of-financial-regulation-symposium/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Videos from the conference</a></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5306</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Future of Financial Regulation: Keynote Conversation with Jelena McWilliams</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-future-of-financial-regulation-keynote-conversation-with-jelena-mcwilliams--57993627</link><description><![CDATA[This episode of Gray Matters is the first of a three-part series and came out of a recent conference we hosted about the future of financial regulation. In this episode, Adam White speaks with former FDIC Chairman Jelena McWilliams about the current state of banking regulation. They discuss presidential oversight of the FDIC, how chairman McWilliams thought about her role, and the most pressing issues facing banks and regulators today.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/event/the-future-of-financial-regulation-symposium/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Videos from the conference</a></li><li>Chairman McWilliams's <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/hostile-takeover-fdic-board-rohit-chopra-michael-hsu-jelena-mcwilliams-abuse-power-11639432939" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">op-ed in the Wall Street Journal</a> about changes in FDIC practice</li><li><a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-senator-elizabeth-warren-biden-bank-heist-fdic-jelena-mcwilliams-rohit-chopra-gruenberg-khan-cfpb-federal-reserve-nominee-11641155812" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wall Street Journal editorial</a> about Chairman McWilliams's resignation from the FDIC</li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57993627</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:42:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57993627/gray_matters_12_12.mp3" length="31689165" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode of Gray Matters is the first of a three-part series and came out of a recent conference we hosted about the future of financial regulation. In this episode, Adam White speaks with former FDIC Chairman Jelena McWilliams about the current...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode of Gray Matters is the first of a three-part series and came out of a recent conference we hosted about the future of financial regulation. In this episode, Adam White speaks with former FDIC Chairman Jelena McWilliams about the current state of banking regulation. They discuss presidential oversight of the FDIC, how chairman McWilliams thought about her role, and the most pressing issues facing banks and regulators today.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/event/the-future-of-financial-regulation-symposium/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Videos from the conference</a></li><li>Chairman McWilliams's <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/hostile-takeover-fdic-board-rohit-chopra-michael-hsu-jelena-mcwilliams-abuse-power-11639432939" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">op-ed in the Wall Street Journal</a> about changes in FDIC practice</li><li><a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-senator-elizabeth-warren-biden-bank-heist-fdic-jelena-mcwilliams-rohit-chopra-gruenberg-khan-cfpb-federal-reserve-nominee-11641155812" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wall Street Journal editorial</a> about Chairman McWilliams's resignation from the FDIC</li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1981</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Cicero Institute 2023 Report on State Regulatory Process Reform</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/cicero-institute-2023-report-on-state-regulatory-process-reform--57919317</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Jonathan Wolfson about a new Cicero Institute report that ranks state regulatory systems based on their accountability, responsiveness, and transparency. They discuss cost-benefit analysis, regulatory sunset provisions, state-level centralized review modeled on OIRA, and venue restrictions.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li>Matthew Nolan and Jonathan Wolfson, <a href="https://ciceroinstitute.org/research/national-regulatory-reform-progress-rankings-report-2023/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">National Regulatory Reform: Progress Rankings Report 2023</a></li><li>Matthew Nolan and Jonathan Wolfson, <a href="https://www.governing.com/policy/state-regulatory-processes-are-ripe-for-reform" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">State Regulatory Processes Are Ripe for Reform</a>, <i>Governing</i></li><li>Cicero Institute, <a href="https://ciceroinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Regulatory-Sunset-Model-Language-.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Regulatory Sunset Model Bill</a></li><li><i>Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy</i>, <a href="https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/vol-45-46/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Administrative Law in the States</a></li><li>Eugene Scalia, 2023 C. Boyden Gray Lecture on the Administrative State, “<a href="https://vimeo.com/815011086" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Administrative State Debate: A View From the Secretary’s Office</a>”</li><li>2021, Stuart Shapiro, <a href="https://lawreview.gmu.edu/print__issues/the-impossibility-of-legislative-regulatory-reform-and-the-futility-of-executive-regulatory-reform/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Impossibility of Legislative Regulatory Reform and the Futility of Executive Regulatory Reform</a>, <i>George Mason Law Review</i></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57919317</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2023 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57919317/gray_matters_12_5.mp3" length="44707340" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Jonathan Wolfson about a new Cicero Institute report that ranks state regulatory systems based on their accountability, responsiveness, and transparency. They discuss cost-benefit analysis, regulatory sunset...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Jonathan Wolfson about a new Cicero Institute report that ranks state regulatory systems based on their accountability, responsiveness, and transparency. They discuss cost-benefit analysis, regulatory sunset provisions, state-level centralized review modeled on OIRA, and venue restrictions.<br /><br /><b>Notes</b>:<br /><ul><li>Matthew Nolan and Jonathan Wolfson, <a href="https://ciceroinstitute.org/research/national-regulatory-reform-progress-rankings-report-2023/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">National Regulatory Reform: Progress Rankings Report 2023</a></li><li>Matthew Nolan and Jonathan Wolfson, <a href="https://www.governing.com/policy/state-regulatory-processes-are-ripe-for-reform" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">State Regulatory Processes Are Ripe for Reform</a>, <i>Governing</i></li><li>Cicero Institute, <a href="https://ciceroinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Regulatory-Sunset-Model-Language-.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Regulatory Sunset Model Bill</a></li><li><i>Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy</i>, <a href="https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jlpp/vol-45-46/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Administrative Law in the States</a></li><li>Eugene Scalia, 2023 C. Boyden Gray Lecture on the Administrative State, “<a href="https://vimeo.com/815011086" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Administrative State Debate: A View From the Secretary’s Office</a>”</li><li>2021, Stuart Shapiro, <a href="https://lawreview.gmu.edu/print__issues/the-impossibility-of-legislative-regulatory-reform-and-the-futility-of-executive-regulatory-reform/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Impossibility of Legislative Regulatory Reform and the Futility of Executive Regulatory Reform</a>, <i>George Mason Law Review</i></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2794</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Chevron on Trial Panel 4: The Future of Deference and Environmental Law</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/chevron-on-trial-panel-4-the-future-of-deference-and-environmental-law--57833015</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the <i>George Mason Law Review</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring Professors Caroline Cecot, Emily Hammond, and E. Donald Elliott, moderated by Senior Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. They focus on the future of <i>Chevron</i> deference in the context of environmental and energy law.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><a href="https://youtu.be/IEHwhU9-IPY" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video from the conference</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57833015</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:56:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57833015/gray_matters_11_28.mp3" length="63251354" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the George Mason Law Review recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of Chevron Deference. This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring Professors...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the <i>George Mason Law Review</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring Professors Caroline Cecot, Emily Hammond, and E. Donald Elliott, moderated by Senior Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. They focus on the future of <i>Chevron</i> deference in the context of environmental and energy law.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><a href="https://youtu.be/IEHwhU9-IPY" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video from the conference</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3953</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Chevron on Trial Panel 3: Who Interprets Statutes?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/chevron-on-trial-panel-3-who-interprets-statutes--57752462</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the George Mason Law Review recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring <b>Aditya Bamzai</b>, <b>Jonathan S. Masur</b>, <b>Eli Nachmany</b>, <b>Victoria F. Nourse</b>, moderated by Judge <b>Chad A. Readler</b> of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.<br /><br />Notes:<br /><a href="https://youtu.be/KchLhcpNR0U" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video from the conference</a><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57752462</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 18:16:48 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57752462/gray_matters_11_21.mp3" length="68051198" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the George Mason Law Review recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of Chevron Deference. This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring Aditya Bamzai,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the George Mason Law Review recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters is a panel discussion featuring <b>Aditya Bamzai</b>, <b>Jonathan S. Masur</b>, <b>Eli Nachmany</b>, <b>Victoria F. Nourse</b>, moderated by Judge <b>Chad A. Readler</b> of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.<br /><br />Notes:<br /><a href="https://youtu.be/KchLhcpNR0U" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video from the conference</a><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4253</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Chevron on Trial Keynote: Paul J. Ray on the Expertise Rationale for Chevron Deference and a Fireside Chat with Jennifer Mascott</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/chevron-on-trial-keynote-paul-j-ray-on-the-expertise-rationale-for-chevron-deference-and-a-fireside-chat-with-jennifer-mascott--57625257</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the <i>George Mason Law Review</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a keynote address from Paul J. Ray, presenting his new paper about the expertise rationale for <i>Chevron</i> deference, and a fireside chat between Mr. Ray and Gray Center Co-Executive Director Jennifer Mascott, discussing his time as Administrator of OIRA.<br /><br />Notes:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://youtu.be/gHI_04m7PMo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video from the conference</a></li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/lover-mystic-bureaucrat-judge-the-communication-of-expertise-and-the-deference-doctrines/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Paul J. Ray's new paper on the expertise rational for <i>Chevron</i> deference</a></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57625257</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 13:40:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57625257/gray_matters_11_13.mp3" length="42847422" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the George Mason Law Review recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of Chevron Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a keynote address from Paul J. Ray,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the <i>George Mason Law Review</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a keynote address from Paul J. Ray, presenting his new paper about the expertise rationale for <i>Chevron</i> deference, and a fireside chat between Mr. Ray and Gray Center Co-Executive Director Jennifer Mascott, discussing his time as Administrator of OIRA.<br /><br />Notes:<br /><ul><li><a href="https://youtu.be/gHI_04m7PMo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video from the conference</a></li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/lover-mystic-bureaucrat-judge-the-communication-of-expertise-and-the-deference-doctrines/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Paul J. Ray's new paper on the expertise rational for <i>Chevron</i> deference</a></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2678</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Chevron on Trial Panel 2: Is Chevron Inevitable? What Should Replace It?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/chevron-on-trial-panel-2-is-chevron-inevitable-what-should-replace-it--57543908</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the <i>George Mason Law Review</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a discussion among Law Professors Lisa Schultz Bressman, John F. Duffy, and Daniel E. Walters about the <i>Loper Bright</i> case and whether some form of judicial deference is unavoidable in administrative law, moderated by Judge David J. Porter of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://youtu.be/qYcxDLPCeUk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video</a> of the panel discussion from the conference</li></ul><br /><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57543908</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57543908/gray_matters_11_7.mp3" length="67583501" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the George Mason Law Review recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of Chevron Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a discussion among Law Professors Lisa...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the <i>George Mason Law Review</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a discussion among Law Professors Lisa Schultz Bressman, John F. Duffy, and Daniel E. Walters about the <i>Loper Bright</i> case and whether some form of judicial deference is unavoidable in administrative law, moderated by Judge David J. Porter of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://youtu.be/qYcxDLPCeUk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video</a> of the panel discussion from the conference</li></ul><br /><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4224</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Chevron on Trial Panel 1: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/chevron-on-trial-panel-1-loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo--57459955</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the <i>George Mason Law Review</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a discussion among Law Professors Kent Barnett, Christopher J. Walker, and Thomas W. Merril about the <i>Loper Bright</i> case and the future of <i>Chevron</i> deference, moderated by Judge Paul B. Matey of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/event/chevron-on-trial-the-supreme-court-and-the-future-of-agency-authority-and-expertise/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video</a> of the panel discussion from the conference</li></ul><br /><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57459955</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 17:45:48 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57459955/gray_matters_10_31.mp3" length="82219178" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the George Mason Law Review recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of Chevron Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a discussion among Law Professors Kent...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State and the <i>George Mason Law Review</i> recently hosted a full-day symposium on the future of <i>Chevron</i> Deference. This episode of Gray Matters features a discussion among Law Professors Kent Barnett, Christopher J. Walker, and Thomas W. Merril about the <i>Loper Bright</i> case and the future of <i>Chevron</i> deference, moderated by Judge Paul B. Matey of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/event/chevron-on-trial-the-supreme-court-and-the-future-of-agency-authority-and-expertise/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video</a> of the panel discussion from the conference</li></ul><br /><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5139</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>SCOTUS Preview Part 2 with Josh Chafetz and Noah Rosenblum</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/scotus-preview-part-2-with-josh-chafetz-and-noah-rosenblum--57279943</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Josh Chafetz and Noah Rosenblum about some of the big administrative law cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. They discuss the state of the Court, where things might be headed next, and problems with conservative critiques of the Administrative State.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li>Noah Rosenblum, <a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-16/my-colleague-steve-williams-bbpt4-c56nl-px3t8-bf7gd-pyjsj-9bc38-2zf3c-wy82l-9nejc-gdazh-ma64r-bzser-23cs8-3e4yl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What We Talk About When We Talk About the Rule of Law in the Administrative State</a>, New York University Journal of Law &amp; Liberty, Vol. 16, No. 3 (2023)</li><li>Josh Chafetz, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4321887" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The New Judicial Power Grab</a>, St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 67 (2023)</li><li>CFPB v. CFAS, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-448/266832/20230515111929890_CFPB%20v.%20CFSA%20Professors%20Amicus%20Brief%20-%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brief of Professors of History and Constitutional Law as Amici Curiae</a> (2023)</li><li>Beau J. Baumann, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4033753" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Americana Administrative Law</a>, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 111 (2023)</li><li>Nikolas Bowie &amp; Daphna Renan, <a href="https://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/the-separation-of-powers-counterrevolution" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Separation-of-Powers Counterrevolution</a>, Vol. 131, No. 7 (2022)</li><li>Ashraf Ahmed, Lev Menand, Noah Rosenblum, <a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ahmed-Menand-Rosenblum-The-Tragedy-of-Presidential-Administration.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Tragedy of Presidential Administration</a>, Gray Center Working Paper, 2021</li><li>Josh Chafetz, <a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300248333/congresss-constitution/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress’s Constitution</a> (2019)</li><li>Leah Litman, <a href="https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol66/iss7/1/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Debunking Antinovelty</a>, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 66, No. 7 (2017)</li><li>Kent Barnett &amp; Christopher J. Walker, <a href="https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol116/iss1/1/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chevron in the Circuit Courts</a>, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 116, No. 1 (2017)</li><li>Daniel R. Ernst, <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/tocquevilles-nightmare-9780199920860?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tocqueville’s Nightmare</a>, Oxford University Press (2014)</li><li>Richard E. Neustadt, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Presidential-Power-Modern-Presidents-Leadership/dp/0029227968" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents</a> (1991)</li></ul><br /><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57279943</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 00:21:44 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57279943/gray_matters_10_17.mp3" length="55075236" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Josh Chafetz and Noah Rosenblum about some of the big administrative law cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. They discuss the state of the Court, where things might be headed next, and problems with...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Josh Chafetz and Noah Rosenblum about some of the big administrative law cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. They discuss the state of the Court, where things might be headed next, and problems with conservative critiques of the Administrative State.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><ul><li>Noah Rosenblum, <a href="https://www.nyujll.com/volume-16/my-colleague-steve-williams-bbpt4-c56nl-px3t8-bf7gd-pyjsj-9bc38-2zf3c-wy82l-9nejc-gdazh-ma64r-bzser-23cs8-3e4yl" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What We Talk About When We Talk About the Rule of Law in the Administrative State</a>, New York University Journal of Law &amp; Liberty, Vol. 16, No. 3 (2023)</li><li>Josh Chafetz, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4321887" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The New Judicial Power Grab</a>, St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 67 (2023)</li><li>CFPB v. CFAS, <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-448/266832/20230515111929890_CFPB%20v.%20CFSA%20Professors%20Amicus%20Brief%20-%20FINAL.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brief of Professors of History and Constitutional Law as Amici Curiae</a> (2023)</li><li>Beau J. Baumann, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4033753" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Americana Administrative Law</a>, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 111 (2023)</li><li>Nikolas Bowie &amp; Daphna Renan, <a href="https://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/the-separation-of-powers-counterrevolution" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Separation-of-Powers Counterrevolution</a>, Vol. 131, No. 7 (2022)</li><li>Ashraf Ahmed, Lev Menand, Noah Rosenblum, <a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Ahmed-Menand-Rosenblum-The-Tragedy-of-Presidential-Administration.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Tragedy of Presidential Administration</a>, Gray Center Working Paper, 2021</li><li>Josh Chafetz, <a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300248333/congresss-constitution/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Congress’s Constitution</a> (2019)</li><li>Leah Litman, <a href="https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol66/iss7/1/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Debunking Antinovelty</a>, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 66, No. 7 (2017)</li><li>Kent Barnett &amp; Christopher J. Walker, <a href="https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol116/iss1/1/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chevron in the Circuit Courts</a>, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 116, No. 1 (2017)</li><li>Daniel R. Ernst, <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/tocquevilles-nightmare-9780199920860?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tocqueville’s Nightmare</a>, Oxford University Press (2014)</li><li>Richard E. Neustadt, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Presidential-Power-Modern-Presidents-Leadership/dp/0029227968" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents</a> (1991)</li></ul><br /><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3442</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>SCOTUS Preview Part 1 with Richard Epstein and Allyson Ho</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/scotus-preview-part-1-with-richard-epstein-and-allyson-ho--57185073</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White talks with NYU Law Professor <b>Richard Epstein</b> and Gibson Dunn Partner <b>Allyson Ho</b> about the upcoming Supreme Court term. They discuss the recent oral argument in the CFPB funding case, the major questions doctrine, how the court should approach revisiting <i>Chevron</i> deference in the upcoming <i>Loper Bright</i>case, and the adjudication system in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/57185073</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:51:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/57185073/gray_matters_10_10.mp3" length="58131354" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White talks with NYU Law Professor Richard Epstein and Gibson Dunn Partner Allyson Ho about the upcoming Supreme Court term. They discuss the recent oral argument in the CFPB funding case, the major questions doctrine, how the court should...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White talks with NYU Law Professor <b>Richard Epstein</b> and Gibson Dunn Partner <b>Allyson Ho</b> about the upcoming Supreme Court term. They discuss the recent oral argument in the CFPB funding case, the major questions doctrine, how the court should approach revisiting <i>Chevron</i> deference in the upcoming <i>Loper Bright</i>case, and the adjudication system in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3633</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>"Why Congress" with Philip Wallach</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-congress-with-philip-wallach--55530259</link><description><![CDATA[Jace Lington talks with AEI’s Philip Wallach about his new book, Why Congress. They discuss what makes Congress central to the American system of representative government and reasons we should look to Congress as the best place to resolve the most contentious issues of our day. <br /> <br /><b>Notes: </b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/why-congress-9780197657874?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Why Congress</a>, Oxford University Press, 2023<br /></li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Wallach-The-Revolution-That-Wasnt.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Revolution That Wasn’t: Conservatives Against Congress, 1981-2018,</a> Gray Center Working Paper 20-22</li><li><a href="https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149&amp;context=public_law_and_legal_theory" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law</a>, Cass Sunstein, 2007 </li></ul><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/55530259</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:14:24 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/55530259/gray_matters_6_29.mp3" length="42449943" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington talks with AEI’s Philip Wallach about his new book, Why Congress. They discuss what makes Congress central to the American system of representative government and reasons we should look to Congress as the best place to resolve the most...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Jace Lington talks with AEI’s Philip Wallach about his new book, Why Congress. They discuss what makes Congress central to the American system of representative government and reasons we should look to Congress as the best place to resolve the most contentious issues of our day. <br /> <br /><b>Notes: </b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/why-congress-9780197657874?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Why Congress</a>, Oxford University Press, 2023<br /></li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Wallach-The-Revolution-That-Wasnt.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Revolution That Wasn’t: Conservatives Against Congress, 1981-2018,</a> Gray Center Working Paper 20-22</li><li><a href="https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149&amp;context=public_law_and_legal_theory" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law</a>, Cass Sunstein, 2007 </li></ul><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2653</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Rethinking Civil Service Management with James-Christian Blockwood</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/rethinking-civil-service-management-with-james-christian-blockwood--54163655</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with James-Christian Blockwood about his recent Government Executive article on civil service reform. They discuss current proposals to make more civil servants removable at will as well as ways to build a nonpartisan, professional federal workforce that protects the interests of the American people.<br /><br /><b>Show Notes:</b> <br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.govexec.com/management/2023/04/lets-rethink-management-our-civil-service/385654/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Let's Rethink the Management of our Civil Service</a>, GovExec, April 28, 2023</li><li><a href="https://ourpublicservice.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Partnership for Public Service,</a> Website</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/podcast/you-report-to-me-with-david-bernhardt/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">"You Report to Me”</a> Gray Matters Podcast with David Bernhardt, May 10, 2023</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/podcast/do-public-sector-unions-make-government-unaccountable/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">“Do Public Sector Unions Make Government Unaccountable?”</a> Gray Matters Podcast with Philip K. Howard, January 24, 2023</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Postell-From-Merit-to-Expertise-and-Back.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">From Merit to Expertise and Back: The Evolution of the U.S. Civil Service System</a>, Joseph Postell, Gray Center Working Paper, February 6, 2020</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Howard-Restoring-Accountability-to-the-Executive-Branch.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Restoring Accountability to the Executive Branch</a>, Philip K. Howard, Gray Center Working Paper, February 6, 2020</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/2021/03/quick-actions-to-improve-recruitment-hiring-and-accountability-in-the-federal-workforce/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Quick Actions to Improve Recruitment, Hiring, and Accountability in the Federal Workforce</a>, Jeffrey Salmon, Gray Center Policy Brief, March 2021</li></ul><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/2020/08/civil-service-pulling-in-or-pushing-away/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Civil Service: Pulling In or Pushing Away</a>, Sally Katzen, Gray Center Policy Brief, August 2020</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/jimmy-carter-and-civil-service-reform/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jimmy Carter and Civil Service Reform</a>, Stuart E. Eizenstat, Gray Center Working Paper, May 22, 2019</li></ul><br /><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/54163655</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 17:57:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/54163655/gray_matters_6_9.mp3" length="43921995" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington talk with James-Christian Blockwood about his recent Government Executive article on civil service reform. They discuss current proposals to make more civil servants removable at will as well as ways to build a nonpartisan,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with James-Christian Blockwood about his recent Government Executive article on civil service reform. They discuss current proposals to make more civil servants removable at will as well as ways to build a nonpartisan, professional federal workforce that protects the interests of the American people.<br /><br /><b>Show Notes:</b> <br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.govexec.com/management/2023/04/lets-rethink-management-our-civil-service/385654/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Let's Rethink the Management of our Civil Service</a>, GovExec, April 28, 2023</li><li><a href="https://ourpublicservice.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Partnership for Public Service,</a> Website</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/podcast/you-report-to-me-with-david-bernhardt/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">"You Report to Me”</a> Gray Matters Podcast with David Bernhardt, May 10, 2023</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/podcast/do-public-sector-unions-make-government-unaccountable/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">“Do Public Sector Unions Make Government Unaccountable?”</a> Gray Matters Podcast with Philip K. Howard, January 24, 2023</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Postell-From-Merit-to-Expertise-and-Back.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">From Merit to Expertise and Back: The Evolution of the U.S. Civil Service System</a>, Joseph Postell, Gray Center Working Paper, February 6, 2020</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Howard-Restoring-Accountability-to-the-Executive-Branch.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Restoring Accountability to the Executive Branch</a>, Philip K. Howard, Gray Center Working Paper, February 6, 2020</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/2021/03/quick-actions-to-improve-recruitment-hiring-and-accountability-in-the-federal-workforce/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Quick Actions to Improve Recruitment, Hiring, and Accountability in the Federal Workforce</a>, Jeffrey Salmon, Gray Center Policy Brief, March 2021</li></ul><br /><ul><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/2020/08/civil-service-pulling-in-or-pushing-away/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Civil Service: Pulling In or Pushing Away</a>, Sally Katzen, Gray Center Policy Brief, August 2020</li><li><a href="https://administrativestate.gmu.edu/paper/jimmy-carter-and-civil-service-reform/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jimmy Carter and Civil Service Reform</a>, Stuart E. Eizenstat, Gray Center Working Paper, May 22, 2019</li></ul><br /><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2745</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>"You Report to Me" with David Bernhardt</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/you-report-to-me-with-david-bernhardt--53809081</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with former Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt about his new book, You Report to Me: Accountability for the Failing Administrative State. In the book, Secretary Bernhardt offers his perspective on reforming the administrative state based on years of public service at the Department of Interior spanning multiple presidential administrations.<br /><br /><b>Show Notes: </b><br /><br /><a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/you-report-to-me/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">You Report to Me: Accountability for the Failing Administrative State</a>, Encounter Books, May 9, 2023<br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53809081</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 17:25:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53809081/gray_matters_5_10.mp3" length="49289427" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington talk with former Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt about his new book, You Report to Me: Accountability for the Failing Administrative State. In the book, Secretary Bernhardt offers his perspective on reforming the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with former Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt about his new book, You Report to Me: Accountability for the Failing Administrative State. In the book, Secretary Bernhardt offers his perspective on reforming the administrative state based on years of public service at the Department of Interior spanning multiple presidential administrations.<br /><br /><b>Show Notes: </b><br /><br /><a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/you-report-to-me/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">You Report to Me: Accountability for the Failing Administrative State</a>, Encounter Books, May 9, 2023<br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3081</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Scalia's Rise</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/scalia-s-rise--53742996</link><description><![CDATA[<b>Jace Lington</b> talks with <b>Adam White</b> about the new book, <i>Scalia: Rise to Greatness, 1936–1986,</i> by James Rosen. They discuss Scalia’s early life and career, including his family, his faith, and his work in private practice and as a lawyer and teacher. Adam highly recommends the book for anyone interested in Antonin Scalia and his contributions to our understanding of the Constitution and American institutions.<br /><br /><b>Show Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.regnery.com/9781684512270/scalia/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><i>Scalia: Rise to Greatness, 1936–1986</i>, James Rosen, Regnery</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.commentary.org/articles/adam-white/scalia-biography-rise-to-greatness/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Scalia’s Rise, Adam White, Commentary</a> </li><li><a href="http://clsnet.org/document.doc?id=924" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Teaching About the Law, Antonin Scalia, Christian Legal Society Quarterly</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/antonin-scalia-legal-educator" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Antonin Scalia, Legal Educator, Adam White, National Affairs</a> </li></ul><br />]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53742996</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53742996/gray_matters_5_4.mp3" length="43675399" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Jace Lington talks with Adam White about the new book, Scalia: Rise to Greatness, 1936–1986, by James Rosen. They discuss Scalia’s early life and career, including his family, his faith, and his work in private practice and as a lawyer and teacher....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[<b>Jace Lington</b> talks with <b>Adam White</b> about the new book, <i>Scalia: Rise to Greatness, 1936–1986,</i> by James Rosen. They discuss Scalia’s early life and career, including his family, his faith, and his work in private practice and as a lawyer and teacher. Adam highly recommends the book for anyone interested in Antonin Scalia and his contributions to our understanding of the Constitution and American institutions.<br /><br /><b>Show Notes:</b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://www.regnery.com/9781684512270/scalia/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><i>Scalia: Rise to Greatness, 1936–1986</i>, James Rosen, Regnery</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.commentary.org/articles/adam-white/scalia-biography-rise-to-greatness/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Scalia’s Rise, Adam White, Commentary</a> </li><li><a href="http://clsnet.org/document.doc?id=924" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Teaching About the Law, Antonin Scalia, Christian Legal Society Quarterly</a> </li><li><a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/antonin-scalia-legal-educator" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Antonin Scalia, Legal Educator, Adam White, National Affairs</a> </li></ul><br />]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2730</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Gray Lecture: The Administrative State Debate—A View From the Secretary’s Office</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/gray-lecture-the-administrative-state-debate-a-view-from-the-secretary-s-office--53668691</link><description><![CDATA[Former Secretary of Labor <b>Eugene Scalia</b> delivers the Second Annual C. Boyden Gray Lecture on the Administrative State. Following an introduction by Boston University School of Law Dean Emeritus <b>Ron Cass</b>, Secretary Scalia discusses his time working at the Department of Labor and how his experience leading a cabinet agency affected the way he thinks about debates involving the administrative state.<br /><br /><b>Show Notes: </b><br /><b></b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://vimeo.com/815011086" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video of Panel</a></li></ul>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53668691</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 18:17:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53668691/gray_matters_4_27.mp3" length="41863389" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia delivers the Second Annual C. Boyden Gray Lecture on the Administrative State. Following an introduction by Boston University School of Law Dean Emeritus Ron Cass, Secretary Scalia discusses his time working at...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former Secretary of Labor <b>Eugene Scalia</b> delivers the Second Annual C. Boyden Gray Lecture on the Administrative State. Following an introduction by Boston University School of Law Dean Emeritus <b>Ron Cass</b>, Secretary Scalia discusses his time working at the Department of Labor and how his experience leading a cabinet agency affected the way he thinks about debates involving the administrative state.<br /><br /><b>Show Notes: </b><br /><b></b><br /><ul><li><a href="https://vimeo.com/815011086" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video of Panel</a></li></ul>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2990</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Gray Lecture Panel 2: Congress’s Power of the Purse in the Modern Administrative State</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/gray-lecture-panel-2-congress-s-power-of-the-purse-in-the-modern-administrative-state--53609336</link><description><![CDATA[Former Director of the Office of Management and Budget <b>Mick Mulvaney</b> and Stanford Law Professor <b>Michael W. McConnell</b> discuss the importance of Congress's power of the purse in constitutional government, an issue of significant importance in cases now before the Supreme Court, in a conversation with Gray Center Co-Executive Director <b>Adam White</b>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53609336</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 20:41:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53609336/gray_matters_4_21.mp3" length="57488166" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Former Director of the Office of Management and Budget Mick Mulvaney and Stanford Law Professor Michael W. McConnell discuss the importance of Congress's power of the purse in constitutional government, an issue of significant importance in cases now...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Former Director of the Office of Management and Budget <b>Mick Mulvaney</b> and Stanford Law Professor <b>Michael W. McConnell</b> discuss the importance of Congress's power of the purse in constitutional government, an issue of significant importance in cases now before the Supreme Court, in a conversation with Gray Center Co-Executive Director <b>Adam White</b>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4107</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Gray Lecture Panel 1: What is "The Rule of Law" in Administrative Law?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/gray-lecture-panel-1-what-is-the-rule-of-law-in-administrative-law--53527221</link><description><![CDATA[Ronald A. Cass, Sally Katzen, and Noah J. Philips kick off the 2023 Annual Gray Lecture with a conversation about the "rule of law" in administrative law. This panel discussion builds on a forthcoming symposium featuring essays on the rule of law that will soon appear in the NYU Journal of Law &amp; Liberty. The Gray Center and the NYU JLL cohosted an event in February on campus at NYU to discuss the themes of the essays. We were glad to bring the conversation to Washington, D.C., to continue the discussion.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><br /><a href="https://vimeo.com/815028191/0b514d9c80" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video of the panel discussion</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53527221</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:04:24 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53527221/gray_matters_lecture_panel_1_what_is_22the_rule_of_law22_in_administrative_law.mp3" length="74441584" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ronald A. Cass, Sally Katzen, and Noah J. Philips kick off the 2023 Annual Gray Lecture with a conversation about the "rule of law" in administrative law. This panel discussion builds on a forthcoming symposium featuring essays on the rule of law that...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ronald A. Cass, Sally Katzen, and Noah J. Philips kick off the 2023 Annual Gray Lecture with a conversation about the "rule of law" in administrative law. This panel discussion builds on a forthcoming symposium featuring essays on the rule of law that will soon appear in the NYU Journal of Law &amp; Liberty. The Gray Center and the NYU JLL cohosted an event in February on campus at NYU to discuss the themes of the essays. We were glad to bring the conversation to Washington, D.C., to continue the discussion.<br /><br /><b>Notes:</b><br /><br /><a href="https://vimeo.com/815028191/0b514d9c80" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Video of the panel discussion</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5317</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/03bff8321b6cfa937d2d8e2cac7de431.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Glock and the Origins of the Novice Administrative State</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-glock-and-the-origins-of-the-novice-administrative-state--53356201</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Judge Glock, director of research and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, about how progressive reformers designed independent regulatory commissions to replace the function of juries, the subject of his new article in <i>Regulation</i> magazine. Glock argues that the original approach to staffing regulatory commissions during the Progressive Era focused on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judge-glock-and-the-origins-of-the-novice-administrative-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1417754</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:23:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53356201/gray_matters_3_27.mp3" length="43411249" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Judge Glock, director of research and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, about how progressive reformers designed independent regulatory commissions to replace the function of juries, the subject of his new...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Judge Glock, director of research and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, about how progressive reformers designed independent regulatory commissions to replace the function of juries, the subject of his new article in <i>Regulation</i> magazine. Glock argues that the original approach to staffing regulatory commissions during the Progressive Era focused on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judge-glock-and-the-origins-of-the-novice-administrative-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2713</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>NYU Rule of Law Symposium Keynote Address: Judge Neomi Rao on the Missing Congress</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-keynote-address-judge-neomi-rao-on-the-missing-congress--53356202</link><description><![CDATA[The Honorable Neomi Rao gives keynote remarks about the tendency of courts to look at tradeoffs between the executive and judicial branches and largely ignore Congress in separation of powers cases. Her speech came out of a forthcoming symposium in the NYU Journal of Law &amp; Liberty and took place on campus at NYU. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-keynote-address-judge-neomi-rao-on-the-missing-congress/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1410544</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53356202/gm_3_20.mp3" length="24354817" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Honorable Neomi Rao gives keynote remarks about the tendency of courts to look at tradeoffs between the executive and judicial branches and largely ignore Congress in separation of powers cases. Her speech came out of a forthcoming symposium in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Honorable Neomi Rao gives keynote remarks about the tendency of courts to look at tradeoffs between the executive and judicial branches and largely ignore Congress in separation of powers cases. Her speech came out of a forthcoming symposium in the NYU Journal of Law &amp; Liberty and took place on campus at NYU. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-keynote-address-judge-neomi-rao-on-the-missing-congress/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1522</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>NYU Rule of Law Symposium Panel 2: The Roberts Court and the Administrative State</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-panel-2-the-roberts-court-and-the-administrative-state--53271817</link><description><![CDATA[Professors Gary Lawson and Sally Katzen join Adam White to talk about the Roberts Court and administrative law on a panel moderated by Judge Steven J. Menashi. The discussion came out of a forthcoming symposium in the NYU Journal of Law &amp; Liberty and took place on campus at NYU. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-panel-2-the-roberts-court-and-the-administrative-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1398124</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271817/gm_3_13_nyu_symposium_2.mp3" length="62968029" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Professors Gary Lawson and Sally Katzen join Adam White to talk about the Roberts Court and administrative law on a panel moderated by Judge Steven J. Menashi. The discussion came out of a forthcoming symposium in the NYU Journal of Law &amp;amp; Liberty...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professors Gary Lawson and Sally Katzen join Adam White to talk about the Roberts Court and administrative law on a panel moderated by Judge Steven J. Menashi. The discussion came out of a forthcoming symposium in the NYU Journal of Law &amp; Liberty and took place on campus at NYU. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-panel-2-the-roberts-court-and-the-administrative-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4498</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>NYU Rule of Law Symposium Panel 1: What is "The Rule of Law" in Administrative Law?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-panel-1-what-is-the-rule-of-law-in-administrative-law--53271808</link><description><![CDATA[Professors Noah A. Rosenblum, Thomas W. Merrill, and Philip Hamburger talk about what the rule of law means in the context of administrative law on a panel moderated by Judge Rachel P. Kovner. The discussion came out of a forthcoming symposium in the NYU Journal of Law &amp; Liberty and took place on campus at NYU. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-panel-1-what-is-the-rule-of-law-in-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1394369</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 16:33:36 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271808/gm_03_03.mp3" length="61829977" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Professors Noah A. Rosenblum, Thomas W. Merrill, and Philip Hamburger talk about what the rule of law means in the context of administrative law on a panel moderated by Judge Rachel P. Kovner. The discussion came out of a forthcoming symposium in the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professors Noah A. Rosenblum, Thomas W. Merrill, and Philip Hamburger talk about what the rule of law means in the context of administrative law on a panel moderated by Judge Rachel P. Kovner. The discussion came out of a forthcoming symposium in the NYU Journal of Law &amp; Liberty and took place on campus at NYU. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nyu-rule-of-law-symposium-panel-1-what-is-the-rule-of-law-in-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5153</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Virginia's New Approach to Regulatory Analysis</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/virginia-s-new-approach-to-regulatory-analysis--53271809</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Andrew Wheeler and Reeve Bull about Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin’s new approach to regulatory policy. They discuss the commonwealth’s new Regulatory Economic Analysis Manual and how it will change the way Virginia regulatory agencies approach their work. Executive Order 19, Development and Review of State Agency Regulations VA Regulatory Economic Analysis... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/virginias-new-approach-to-regulatory-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1389587</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 22:47:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271809/gray_matters_2_20.mp3" length="42805208" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Andrew Wheeler and Reeve Bull about Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin’s new approach to regulatory policy. They discuss the commonwealth’s new Regulatory Economic Analysis Manual and how it will change the way...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Andrew Wheeler and Reeve Bull about Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin’s new approach to regulatory policy. They discuss the commonwealth’s new Regulatory Economic Analysis Manual and how it will change the way Virginia regulatory agencies approach their work. Executive Order 19, Development and Review of State Agency Regulations VA Regulatory Economic Analysis... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/virginias-new-approach-to-regulatory-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2676</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Symposium on Administrative Law in the States</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/symposium-on-administrative-law-in-the-states--53271841</link><description><![CDATA[On January 9, 2023, the C. Boyden Gray Center hosted a symposium, “Administrative Law in the States,” with the Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy and the Harvard Federalist Society. It featured the following participants: -Justice Brian Hagedorn, Wisconsin Supreme Court -Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit -Justice David N. Wecht... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/symposium-on-administrative-law-in-the-states/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1384286</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 14:29:42 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271841/gray_matters_2_9a.mp3" length="84738732" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On January 9, 2023, the C. Boyden Gray Center hosted a symposium, “Administrative Law in the States,” with the Harvard Journal of Law &amp;amp; Public Policy and the Harvard Federalist Society. It featured the following participants: -Justice Brian...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On January 9, 2023, the C. Boyden Gray Center hosted a symposium, “Administrative Law in the States,” with the Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy and the Harvard Federalist Society. It featured the following participants: -Justice Brian Hagedorn, Wisconsin Supreme Court -Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit -Justice David N. Wecht... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/symposium-on-administrative-law-in-the-states/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5297</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Do Public Sector Unions Make Government Unaccountable?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/do-public-sector-unions-make-government-unaccountable--53271838</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Philip K. Howard about the problems public unions create for modern governance, the subject of his new book, Not Accountable: Rethinking the Constitutionality of Public Employee Unions. They discuss specific challenges faced by executive officials at the local, state, and federal level working with unionized employees and ways to address those issues. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/do-public-sector-unions-make-government-unaccountable/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1377845</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:46:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271838/gm_phillip_howard.mp3" length="34348743" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Philip K. Howard about the problems public unions create for modern governance, the subject of his new book, Not Accountable: Rethinking the Constitutionality of Public Employee Unions. They discuss specific...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Philip K. Howard about the problems public unions create for modern governance, the subject of his new book, Not Accountable: Rethinking the Constitutionality of Public Employee Unions. They discuss specific challenges faced by executive officials at the local, state, and federal level working with unionized employees and ways to address those issues. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/do-public-sector-unions-make-government-unaccountable/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2863</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Promise and the Peril of AI in the Workplace</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-promise-and-the-peril-of-ai-in-the-workplace--53271811</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with EEOC Commissioner Keith Sonderling and his chief counsel, Brad Kelley, about how to address the threat of employment discrimination posed by artificial intelligence tools, the subject of their new article in the University of Miami Law Review. They discuss how AI can help make the hiring process easier for employers and how using those tools intersects with... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-promise-and-the-peril-of-ai-in-the-workplace/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1362505</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 17:23:21 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271811/gray_matters_12_15.mp3" length="37846121" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with EEOC Commissioner Keith Sonderling and his chief counsel, Brad Kelley, about how to address the threat of employment discrimination posed by artificial intelligence tools, the subject of their new article in the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with EEOC Commissioner Keith Sonderling and his chief counsel, Brad Kelley, about how to address the threat of employment discrimination posed by artificial intelligence tools, the subject of their new article in the University of Miami Law Review. They discuss how AI can help make the hiring process easier for employers and how using those tools intersects with... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-promise-and-the-peril-of-ai-in-the-workplace/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3154</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Administrative Law Abroad: The View from Poland</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/administrative-law-abroad-the-view-from-poland--53271814</link><description><![CDATA[What do American and European administrative law have in common? How do they differ? And what might Americans and Europeans learn from each other? These questions were on the mind of Prof. Przyemyslaw Ostojski when he visited the Gray Center this year. As a professor at the Academy of Justice in Warsaw and a prosecutor in the Republic of Poland’s Attorney General’s Office, he is an expert on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/administrative-law-abroad-the-view-from-poland/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1361014</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:42:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271814/gray_matters_admin_law_and_poland.mp3" length="31264831" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>What do American and European administrative law have in common? How do they differ? And what might Americans and Europeans learn from each other? These questions were on the mind of Prof. Przyemyslaw Ostojski when he visited the Gray Center this...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[What do American and European administrative law have in common? How do they differ? And what might Americans and Europeans learn from each other? These questions were on the mind of Prof. Przyemyslaw Ostojski when he visited the Gray Center this year. As a professor at the Academy of Justice in Warsaw and a prosecutor in the Republic of Poland’s Attorney General’s Office, he is an expert on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/administrative-law-abroad-the-view-from-poland/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2606</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The FTC's Litigation: In Court and In-House</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ftc-s-litigation-in-court-and-in-house--53271823</link><description><![CDATA[This episode is from the fourth panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Ashley Baker, Director of Public Policy, Committee for Justice Justin (Gus) Hurwitz, Professor of Law, Nebraska College of Law, University of Nebraska – Lincoln; The Menard Director, Nebraska Governance and Technology... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-ftcs-litigation-in-court-and-in-house/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1341860</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 19:27:13 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271823/gray_matters_11_21.mp3" length="72517092" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode is from the fourth panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Ashley Baker, Director of Public Policy, Committee for Justice Justin...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode is from the fourth panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Ashley Baker, Director of Public Policy, Committee for Justice Justin (Gus) Hurwitz, Professor of Law, Nebraska College of Law, University of Nebraska – Lincoln; The Menard Director, Nebraska Governance and Technology... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-ftcs-litigation-in-court-and-in-house/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4533</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The FTC and the Roberts Court: The Major Questions Doctrine, Rulemaking, and More</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ftc-and-the-roberts-court-the-major-questions-doctrine-rulemaking-and-more--53271857</link><description><![CDATA[This episode is from the third panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Professor of Practice in Administrative Law, Washington College of Law, American University Thomas W. Merrill, Charles Evans Hughes Professor, Columbia Law School The Honorable Eugene Scalia, Partner... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-ftc-and-the-roberts-court-the-major-questions-doctrine-rulemaking-and-more/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1340035</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 00:38:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271857/gm_1118.mp3" length="70375175" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode is from the third panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Professor of Practice in Administrative Law,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode is from the third panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Professor of Practice in Administrative Law, Washington College of Law, American University Thomas W. Merrill, Charles Evans Hughes Professor, Columbia Law School The Honorable Eugene Scalia, Partner... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-ftc-and-the-roberts-court-the-major-questions-doctrine-rulemaking-and-more/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4399</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Keynote Speech by William E. Kovacic</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/keynote-speech-by-william-e-kovacic--53271826</link><description><![CDATA[This episode is from the Keynote Speech of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It was given by William E. Kovacic, Director, Competition Law Center; Global Competition Professor of Law and Policy; Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School; former Chairman... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/keynote-speech-by-william-e-kovacic/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1338322</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 02:44:04 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271826/gray_matters_william_e_kovacic.mp3" length="37068403" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode is from the Keynote Speech of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It was given by William E. Kovacic, Director, Competition Law Center; Global Competition Professor of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode is from the Keynote Speech of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It was given by William E. Kovacic, Director, Competition Law Center; Global Competition Professor of Law and Policy; Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School; former Chairman... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/keynote-speech-by-william-e-kovacic/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3089</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The FTC's Independence After Seila Law v. CFPB</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-ftc-s-independence-after-seila-law-v-cfpb--53271829</link><description><![CDATA[This episode is from the second panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Svetlana Gans, Partner, Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP Jennifer Mascott, Assistant Professor of Law &amp; Co-Executive Director, The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, Scalia Law School Paul R. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-ftcs-independence-after-seila-law-v-cfpb/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1336524</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 01:54:42 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271829/gray_matters_11_10.mp3" length="50748521" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode is from the second panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Svetlana Gans, Partner, Gibson, Dunn &amp;amp; Crutcher LLP Jennifer...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode is from the second panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Svetlana Gans, Partner, Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP Jennifer Mascott, Assistant Professor of Law &amp; Co-Executive Director, The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, Scalia Law School Paul R. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-ftcs-independence-after-seila-law-v-cfpb/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4229</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>American Antitrust Law: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/american-antitrust-law-where-are-we-and-where-are-we-going--53271831</link><description><![CDATA[This episode is from the first panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Andrew I. Gavil, Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law Thomas Hazlett, H.H. Macaulay Endowed Professor of Economics, Wilbur O. and Ann Powers College of Business, Clemson University Bernard (Barry) A. Nigro... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/american-antitrust-law-where-are-we-and-where-are-we-going/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1334681</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 20:39:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271831/gray_matters_november_7.mp3" length="71476998" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This episode is from the first panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Andrew I. Gavil, Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode is from the first panel of the Gray Center’s October 14 conference, “The Administration of Antitrust: The FTC and the Rule of Law.” It features the following experts: Andrew I. Gavil, Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law Thomas Hazlett, H.H. Macaulay Endowed Professor of Economics, Wilbur O. and Ann Powers College of Business, Clemson University Bernard (Barry) A. Nigro... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/american-antitrust-law-where-are-we-and-where-are-we-going/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5957</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Regulatory Budgeting: Past and Future</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/regulatory-budgeting-past-and-future--53271815</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Anthony P. Campau about his experience with regulatory budgeting during the Trump administration. They discuss Campau’s recent paper, Regulatory Budgeting in the U.S. Federal Government: A First-Hand Account of the Initial Experience and Recommendations for Future Regulatory Budgets, published as part of a symposium in the Harvard Journal of Law &amp; <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulatory-budgeting-past-and-future/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1329521</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271815/gray_matters_regulatory_budgeting.mp3" length="51845248" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Anthony P. Campau about his experience with regulatory budgeting during the Trump administration. They discuss Campau’s recent paper, Regulatory Budgeting in the U.S. Federal Government: A First-Hand Account of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with Anthony P. Campau about his experience with regulatory budgeting during the Trump administration. They discuss Campau’s recent paper, Regulatory Budgeting in the U.S. Federal Government: A First-Hand Account of the Initial Experience and Recommendations for Future Regulatory Budgets, published as part of a symposium in the Harvard Journal of Law &amp; <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulatory-budgeting-past-and-future/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3241</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Regulate Big Tech?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/regulate-big-tech--53271810</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with NYU Law Professor Richard Epstein and Meta Oversight Board Member John Samples about the debate surrounding whether and how to regulate Big Tech companies. They discuss Epstein and Samples’ recent papers, published as part of the Digital Platforms and American Life project at the American Enterprise Institute, and think about content moderation decisions in... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulate-big-tech/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1321874</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 17:40:26 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271810/gray_matters_10_5.mp3" length="56620431" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with NYU Law Professor Richard Epstein and Meta Oversight Board Member John Samples about the debate surrounding whether and how to regulate Big Tech companies. They discuss Epstein and Samples’ recent papers,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with NYU Law Professor Richard Epstein and Meta Oversight Board Member John Samples about the debate surrounding whether and how to regulate Big Tech companies. They discuss Epstein and Samples’ recent papers, published as part of the Digital Platforms and American Life project at the American Enterprise Institute, and think about content moderation decisions in... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulate-big-tech/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3539</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pulse of the Court: Separation of Powers, Criminal Law, &amp; Petitions from the Second Circuit</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pulse-of-the-court-separation-of-powers-criminal-law-petitions-from-the-second-circuit--53271828</link><description><![CDATA[Join Prof. Steve Vladeck (U-Texas) &amp; Prof. Jenn Mascott who discuss Prof. Mascott’s amicus brief in Nordlicht v. U.S. (21-1319), distributed for the Court’s 9/28 conference this week, that addresses Blackstone, Rule 33 motions, and a deep circuit split &amp; Prof. Vladeck’s recently filed petition in Donziger v U.S. (22-274), addressing the Appointments Clause, special prosecutors, and a split Second... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-pulse-of-the-court-separation-of-powers-criminal-law-petitions-from-the-second-circuit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1317153</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:15:58 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271828/gray_matters_926_1.mp3" length="47556986" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Join Prof. Steve Vladeck (U-Texas) &amp;amp; Prof. Jenn Mascott who discuss Prof. Mascott’s amicus brief in Nordlicht v. U.S. (21-1319), distributed for the Court’s 9/28 conference this week, that addresses Blackstone, Rule 33 motions, and a deep circuit...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Join Prof. Steve Vladeck (U-Texas) &amp; Prof. Jenn Mascott who discuss Prof. Mascott’s amicus brief in Nordlicht v. U.S. (21-1319), distributed for the Court’s 9/28 conference this week, that addresses Blackstone, Rule 33 motions, and a deep circuit split &amp; Prof. Vladeck’s recently filed petition in Donziger v U.S. (22-274), addressing the Appointments Clause, special prosecutors, and a split Second... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-pulse-of-the-court-separation-of-powers-criminal-law-petitions-from-the-second-circuit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2973</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Administration of Criminal Justice</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-administration-of-criminal-justice--53271833</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with NYU Professor Rachel E. Barkow about Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suspending a state attorney for announcing his intention not to prosecute certain cases involving abortion and other politically charged issues. They discuss how prosecutorial discretion works (or doesn’t), lessons the federal government can learn from state criminal law experience... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-criminal-justice/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1312510</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:48:28 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271833/gray_matters_the_administration_of_criminal_justice.mp3" length="51645045" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington chat with NYU Professor Rachel E. Barkow about Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suspending a state attorney for announcing his intention not to prosecute certain cases involving abortion and other politically charged issues....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington chat with NYU Professor Rachel E. Barkow about Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suspending a state attorney for announcing his intention not to prosecute certain cases involving abortion and other politically charged issues. They discuss how prosecutorial discretion works (or doesn’t), lessons the federal government can learn from state criminal law experience... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-criminal-justice/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3228</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Rediscovering the Roots of Administrative Procedure</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/rediscovering-the-roots-of-administrative-procedure--53271851</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Emily Bremer from the University of Notre Dame Law School about the Administrative Procedure Act and her two recent law review articles about how the original understanding of administrative rulemaking and adjudication differs from current practice. They also discussed the Bremer-Kovacs Collection, which brings together original sources related to the 1946... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/rediscovering-the-roots-of-administrative-procedure/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1303809</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 21:25:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271851/gray_matt_8_24_2022.mp3" length="54853300" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Emily Bremer from the University of Notre Dame Law School about the Administrative Procedure Act and her two recent law review articles about how the original understanding of administrative rulemaking and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington talk with Emily Bremer from the University of Notre Dame Law School about the Administrative Procedure Act and her two recent law review articles about how the original understanding of administrative rulemaking and adjudication differs from current practice. They also discussed the Bremer-Kovacs Collection, which brings together original sources related to the 1946... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/rediscovering-the-roots-of-administrative-procedure/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3429</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Major Questions About the Future of the Chevron Doctrine</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/major-questions-about-the-future-of-the-chevron-doctrine--53271835</link><description><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington, Research Director at the Gray Center, chat with Columbia Law School Professor Thomas W. Merrill about his new book: The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State. They discuss theChevron doctrine, how to think about judicial review of agency interpretations of statutes, and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/major-questions-about-the-future-of-the-chevron-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1288378</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271835/gray_matters_chevron_doctrine.mp3" length="51140986" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam White and Jace Lington, Research Director at the Gray Center, chat with Columbia Law School Professor Thomas W. Merrill about his new book: The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State. They discuss...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam White and Jace Lington, Research Director at the Gray Center, chat with Columbia Law School Professor Thomas W. Merrill about his new book: The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State. They discuss theChevron doctrine, how to think about judicial review of agency interpretations of statutes, and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/major-questions-about-the-future-of-the-chevron-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3197</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Pulse of the Court: West Virginia v. EPA Reaction</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/pulse-of-the-court-west-virginia-v-epa-reaction--53271837</link><description><![CDATA[Professor Jenn Mascott is joined by Chad Squitieri, associate at Gibson, Dunn, &amp; Crutcher LLP and Eli Nachmany, Senior Research Fellow at the C. Boyden Gray Center, to discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling in West Virginia v. EPA and what it means for the administrative state moving forward. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/pulse-of-the-court-west-virginia-v-epa-reaction/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1279926</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 17:44:59 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271837/gray_matters_pulse.mp3" length="50188457" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Professor Jenn Mascott is joined by Chad Squitieri, associate at Gibson, Dunn, &amp;amp; Crutcher LLP and Eli Nachmany, Senior Research Fellow at the C. Boyden Gray Center, to discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling in West Virginia v. EPA and what it means...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor Jenn Mascott is joined by Chad Squitieri, associate at Gibson, Dunn, &amp; Crutcher LLP and Eli Nachmany, Senior Research Fellow at the C. Boyden Gray Center, to discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling in West Virginia v. EPA and what it means for the administrative state moving forward. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/pulse-of-the-court-west-virginia-v-epa-reaction/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3137</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Keynote Conversation with Ambassador C. Boyden Gray</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/keynote-conversation-with-ambassador-c-boyden-gray--53271844</link><description><![CDATA[Boyden Gray, former White House Counsel and U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, chats with Gray Center Co-Executive Director Jennifer Mascott, where he described how Congress has changed over the decades, talked about his experiences as a law clerk at the US Supreme Court and as White House Counsel, and spoke about Justice Clarence Thomas’s legacy on the Court. From the Gray Center’s May 25... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/keynote-conversation-with-ambassador-c-boyden-gray/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1268555</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271844/gray_matters_keynote_conversations_67.mp3" length="44780483" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Boyden Gray, former White House Counsel and U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, chats with Gray Center Co-Executive Director Jennifer Mascott, where he described how Congress has changed over the decades, talked about his experiences as a law clerk...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Boyden Gray, former White House Counsel and U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, chats with Gray Center Co-Executive Director Jennifer Mascott, where he described how Congress has changed over the decades, talked about his experiences as a law clerk at the US Supreme Court and as White House Counsel, and spoke about Justice Clarence Thomas’s legacy on the Court. From the Gray Center’s May 25... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/keynote-conversation-with-ambassador-c-boyden-gray/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2799</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Congress, Jurisdiction, Process, &amp; the Institution of the Supreme Court</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-jurisdiction-process-the-institution-of-the-supreme-court--53271853</link><description><![CDATA[This panel discussion, from the Gray Center’s May 25 Capitol Hill Conference, consisted of a timely discussion on the leaked Dobbs draft opinion and the implications of this relating to the institution of the Supreme Court. It featured Hunton Andrews Kurth Special Counsel The Honorable Thomas B. Griffith, Sullivan &amp; Cromwell LLP partner Jeffrey B. Wall, Advisory Opinions podcast host Sarah Isgur... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/congress-jurisdiction-process-the-institution-of-the-supreme-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1266078</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 16:51:49 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271853/gray_matters_congress_jurisdiction_process_institution_of_scotus.mp3" length="77061144" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This panel discussion, from the Gray Center’s May 25 Capitol Hill Conference, consisted of a timely discussion on the leaked Dobbs draft opinion and the implications of this relating to the institution of the Supreme Court. It featured Hunton Andrews...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This panel discussion, from the Gray Center’s May 25 Capitol Hill Conference, consisted of a timely discussion on the leaked Dobbs draft opinion and the implications of this relating to the institution of the Supreme Court. It featured Hunton Andrews Kurth Special Counsel The Honorable Thomas B. Griffith, Sullivan &amp; Cromwell LLP partner Jeffrey B. Wall, Advisory Opinions podcast host Sarah Isgur... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/congress-jurisdiction-process-the-institution-of-the-supreme-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4817</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Congress Versus the Executive</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-versus-the-executive--53271824</link><description><![CDATA[This panel discussion, from the Gray Center’s May 25 Capitol Hill Conference, focused on how Congress can exercise effective oversight authority to get nonpublic information from the Executive Branch. It featured Sidley Austin LLP partner William R. Levi, Jones Day partner Hashim M. Mooppan, and was moderated by The Honorable Steven G. Bradbury, former General Counsel and Acting Secretary of the U. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/congress-versus-the-executive/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1265204</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271824/gray_matters_congress_vs_the_executive.mp3" length="72318267" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This panel discussion, from the Gray Center’s May 25 Capitol Hill Conference, focused on how Congress can exercise effective oversight authority to get nonpublic information from the Executive Branch. It featured Sidley Austin LLP partner William R....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This panel discussion, from the Gray Center’s May 25 Capitol Hill Conference, focused on how Congress can exercise effective oversight authority to get nonpublic information from the Executive Branch. It featured Sidley Austin LLP partner William R. Levi, Jones Day partner Hashim M. Mooppan, and was moderated by The Honorable Steven G. Bradbury, former General Counsel and Acting Secretary of the U. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/congress-versus-the-executive/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4520</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Nondelegation Doctrine</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-nondelegation-doctrine--53271812</link><description><![CDATA[Adam chats with AEI’s Peter Wallison and John Yoo about their new book: The Administrative State Before the Supreme Court: Perspectives on the Nondelegation Doctrine. They discuss common arguments about the nondelegation doctrine and whether the US Supreme Court is likely to start applying the doctrine to restrain administrative agencies. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-nondelegation-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1255071</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 15:42:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271812/gray_matters_the_nondelegation_doctrine.mp3" length="26107214" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam chats with AEI’s Peter Wallison and John Yoo about their new book: The Administrative State Before the Supreme Court: Perspectives on the Nondelegation Doctrine. They discuss common arguments about the nondelegation doctrine and whether the US...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam chats with AEI’s Peter Wallison and John Yoo about their new book: The Administrative State Before the Supreme Court: Perspectives on the Nondelegation Doctrine. They discuss common arguments about the nondelegation doctrine and whether the US Supreme Court is likely to start applying the doctrine to restrain administrative agencies. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-nondelegation-doctrine/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2611</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Lunchtime Conversation Featuring The Honorable Paul D. Clement</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/lunchtime-conversation-featuring-the-honorable-paul-d-clement--53271865</link><description><![CDATA[Ed Whelan, Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, chats with Paul D. Clement, 43rd Solicitor General of the United States, about Clement’s experience with religious liberty cases leading up to the 110th case he has argued before the US Supreme Court, Kennedy v. Bremerton School District. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/lunchtime-conversation-featuring-the-honorable-paul-d-clement/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1252950</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271865/gray_matters_lunchtime_conversation_featuring_the_honorable_paul_d_clement.mp3" length="23121679" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Ed Whelan, Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, chats with Paul D. Clement, 43rd Solicitor General of the United States, about Clement’s experience with religious liberty cases leading up to the 110th case he has argued...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Ed Whelan, Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, chats with Paul D. Clement, 43rd Solicitor General of the United States, about Clement’s experience with religious liberty cases leading up to the 110th case he has argued before the US Supreme Court, Kennedy v. Bremerton School District. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/lunchtime-conversation-featuring-the-honorable-paul-d-clement/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2312</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Religious Liberty and the Supreme Court</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/religious-liberty-and-the-supreme-court--53271870</link><description><![CDATA[Attorneys Nathan Lewin, Erin E. Murphy, Mark Rienzi, and Marc D. Stern talk about upcoming religious liberty cases before the US Supreme Court in a panel discussion moderated by former Assistant Attorney General Steven A. Engel. The panelists debate the potential impact of Supreme Court rulings in those cases in addition to whether current approaches to protecting religious liberty are adequate to... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/religious-liberty-and-the-supreme-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1251680</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 15:59:45 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271870/gray_matters_religious_libery_and_the_supreme_court.mp3" length="43614218" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Attorneys Nathan Lewin, Erin E. Murphy, Mark Rienzi, and Marc D. Stern talk about upcoming religious liberty cases before the US Supreme Court in a panel discussion moderated by former Assistant Attorney General Steven A. Engel. The panelists debate...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Attorneys Nathan Lewin, Erin E. Murphy, Mark Rienzi, and Marc D. Stern talk about upcoming religious liberty cases before the US Supreme Court in a panel discussion moderated by former Assistant Attorney General Steven A. Engel. The panelists debate the potential impact of Supreme Court rulings in those cases in addition to whether current approaches to protecting religious liberty are adequate to... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/religious-liberty-and-the-supreme-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4362</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Religious Liberty, Government Regulation, and the Public Square</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/religious-liberty-government-regulation-and-the-public-square--53271859</link><description><![CDATA[Matt Bowman of Alliance Defending Freedom, Andrea R. Lucas of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Roger T. Severino of the Ethics and Public Policy Center talk about developing policy challenges related to the free exercise of religion in a panel discussion moderated by D.C. District Court Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The panelists touch on issues like Covid-related limits on worship... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/religious-liberty-government-regulation-and-the-public-square/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1249951</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:13:59 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271859/gray_matters_religious_liberty_government_regulation_and_the_public_square.mp3" length="44106626" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Matt Bowman of Alliance Defending Freedom, Andrea R. Lucas of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Roger T. Severino of the Ethics and Public Policy Center talk about developing policy challenges related to the free exercise of religion in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Matt Bowman of Alliance Defending Freedom, Andrea R. Lucas of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Roger T. Severino of the Ethics and Public Policy Center talk about developing policy challenges related to the free exercise of religion in a panel discussion moderated by D.C. District Court Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The panelists touch on issues like Covid-related limits on worship... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/religious-liberty-government-regulation-and-the-public-square/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4411</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Submerged Independent Agencies: With Brian D. Feinstein</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/submerged-independent-agencies-with-brian-d-feinstein--53271887</link><description><![CDATA[Adam chats with Wharton School Assistant Professor Brian D. Feinstein about his new paper, “Submerged Independent Agencies,” co-authored with the University of Chicago Law School’s Jennifer Nou. The paper covers hundreds of examples of administrative agency officials sub-delegating rulemaking powers to civil servants who are not appointed by the president, a court of law, or a department head and... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/submerged-independent-agencies-with-brian-d-feinstein/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1249046</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:39:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271887/gray_matters_submerged_independent_agencies.mp3" length="28231074" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Adam chats with Wharton School Assistant Professor Brian D. Feinstein about his new paper, “Submerged Independent Agencies,” co-authored with the University of Chicago Law School’s Jennifer Nou. The paper covers hundreds of examples of administrative...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Adam chats with Wharton School Assistant Professor Brian D. Feinstein about his new paper, “Submerged Independent Agencies,” co-authored with the University of Chicago Law School’s Jennifer Nou. The paper covers hundreds of examples of administrative agency officials sub-delegating rulemaking powers to civil servants who are not appointed by the president, a court of law, or a department head and... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/submerged-independent-agencies-with-brian-d-feinstein/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2353</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Gray Lecture on the Administrative State Panel Discussion: The Future of Independent Agencies After Seila and Collins</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-gray-lecture-on-the-administrative-state-panel-discussion-the-future-of-independent-agencies-after-seila-and-collins--53271846</link><description><![CDATA[On March 18, the Gray Center hosted the First Annual Gray Lecture on the Administrative State, an event that we hope to make a keynote of our calendar each year. This included a panel discussion, featuring Professors John Harrison, Aaron Nielson and Aditya Bamzai, along with Gray Center Co-Executive Director Adam White. They discussed the future of “agency independence” in the aftermath of Seila... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-gray-lecture-on-the-administrative-state-panel-discussion-the-future-of-independent-agencies-after-seila-and-collins/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1212696</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 15:53:44 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271846/gray_matters_the_future_of_independent_agencies.mp3" length="59383035" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On March 18, the Gray Center hosted the First Annual Gray Lecture on the Administrative State, an event that we hope to make a keynote of our calendar each year. This included a panel discussion, featuring Professors John Harrison, Aaron Nielson and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On March 18, the Gray Center hosted the First Annual Gray Lecture on the Administrative State, an event that we hope to make a keynote of our calendar each year. This included a panel discussion, featuring Professors John Harrison, Aaron Nielson and Aditya Bamzai, along with Gray Center Co-Executive Director Adam White. They discussed the future of “agency independence” in the aftermath of Seila... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-gray-lecture-on-the-administrative-state-panel-discussion-the-future-of-independent-agencies-after-seila-and-collins/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4949</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Controlling Rent Control: Andrew Pincus on his Constitutional Case Against New York City</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/controlling-rent-control-andrew-pincus-on-his-constitutional-case-against-new-york-city--53271894</link><description><![CDATA[Last month, the Second Circuit heard oral arguments in Community Housing Improvement Program v. City of New York, a constitutional challenge to New York’s Rent Stabilization Law. The plaintiffs argue that New York’s law violates the Constitution’s Due Process and Takings Clauses. To discuss the case—and its relationship to federal administrative state issues—Adam chats with the plaintiffs’ lead... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/controlling-rent-control-andrew-pincus-on-his-constitutional-case-against-new-york-city/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1202588</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:47:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271894/gray_matters_controlling_rent_control.mp3" length="22663231" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Last month, the Second Circuit heard oral arguments in Community Housing Improvement Program v. City of New York, a constitutional challenge to New York’s Rent Stabilization Law. The plaintiffs argue that New York’s law violates the Constitution’s Due...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Last month, the Second Circuit heard oral arguments in Community Housing Improvement Program v. City of New York, a constitutional challenge to New York’s Rent Stabilization Law. The plaintiffs argue that New York’s law violates the Constitution’s Due Process and Takings Clauses. To discuss the case—and its relationship to federal administrative state issues—Adam chats with the plaintiffs’ lead... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/controlling-rent-control-andrew-pincus-on-his-constitutional-case-against-new-york-city/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1889</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>“The Pulse of the Court”: Lawsuits Against Government Officers &amp; the February Sitting</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pulse-of-the-court-lawsuits-against-government-officers-the-february-sitting--53271818</link><description><![CDATA[Steven Engel Today, in the Gray Center’s “Pulse of the Court” podcast series, Steve Engel of Dechert LLP and Jenn discuss the just-completed February oral argument sitting at the Supreme Court. They focus primarily on the final case of the sitting, Egbert v. Boule, which raises important questions about whether, and when, federal officers should be subject to monetary damages for alleged... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-pulse-of-the-court-lawsuits-against-government-officers-the-february-sitting/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1198673</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 19:14:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271818/gray_matters_egbert_v_boule.mp3" length="36008584" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Steven Engel Today, in the Gray Center’s “Pulse of the Court” podcast series, Steve Engel of Dechert LLP and Jenn discuss the just-completed February oral argument sitting at the Supreme Court. They focus primarily on the final case of the sitting,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Steven Engel Today, in the Gray Center’s “Pulse of the Court” podcast series, Steve Engel of Dechert LLP and Jenn discuss the just-completed February oral argument sitting at the Supreme Court. They focus primarily on the final case of the sitting, Egbert v. Boule, which raises important questions about whether, and when, federal officers should be subject to monetary damages for alleged... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-pulse-of-the-court-lawsuits-against-government-officers-the-february-sitting/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2250</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Administrative State Goes to Court: A “Halftime” Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Term</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-administrative-state-goes-to-court-a-halftime-analysis-of-the-supreme-court-s-term--53271821</link><description><![CDATA[Please join us for a conversation on the Supreme Court’s term so far, and the cases soon to be heard. Halfway through the Supreme Court’s term, the Justices already have issued decisions with major consequences for the administrative state — most recently, its decisions on the OSHA and HHS vaccine mandates. Next the Court will hear cases involving the breadth and limits of the EPA’s powers on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administrative-state-goes-to-court-a-halftime-analysis-of-the-supreme-courts-term/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1130548</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 17:15:48 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271821/gray_matters_the_administrative_state_goes_to_court.mp3" length="48829148" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Please join us for a conversation on the Supreme Court’s term so far, and the cases soon to be heard. Halfway through the Supreme Court’s term, the Justices already have issued decisions with major consequences for the administrative state — most...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Please join us for a conversation on the Supreme Court’s term so far, and the cases soon to be heard. Halfway through the Supreme Court’s term, the Justices already have issued decisions with major consequences for the administrative state — most recently, its decisions on the OSHA and HHS vaccine mandates. Next the Court will hear cases involving the breadth and limits of the EPA’s powers on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administrative-state-goes-to-court-a-halftime-analysis-of-the-supreme-courts-term/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4069</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>“Major Questions,” Major Stakes: Kristin Hickman and Gillian Metzger on the OSHA Vaccine Mandate Case</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/major-questions-major-stakes-kristin-hickman-and-gillian-metzger-on-the-osha-vaccine-mandate-case--53271856</link><description><![CDATA[When the Supreme Court ruled that OSHA’s Covid vaccine mandate was unlawful, Justice Gorsuch wrote separately that the Court’s decision “rightly applies the major questions doctrine.” The Major Questions Doctrine has been increasingly important in the Supreme Court and lower courts’ decisions, among judges who believe (as Gorsuch puts it) that the doctrine “ensures that the national government’s... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/major-questions-major-stakes-kristin-hickman-and-gillian-metzger-on-the-osha-vaccine-mandate-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1125534</guid><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 16:36:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271856/gray_matters_major_questions.mp3" length="38239211" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>When the Supreme Court ruled that OSHA’s Covid vaccine mandate was unlawful, Justice Gorsuch wrote separately that the Court’s decision “rightly applies the major questions doctrine.” The Major Questions Doctrine has been increasingly important in the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[When the Supreme Court ruled that OSHA’s Covid vaccine mandate was unlawful, Justice Gorsuch wrote separately that the Court’s decision “rightly applies the major questions doctrine.” The Major Questions Doctrine has been increasingly important in the Supreme Court and lower courts’ decisions, among judges who believe (as Gorsuch puts it) that the doctrine “ensures that the national government’s... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/major-questions-major-stakes-kristin-hickman-and-gillian-metzger-on-the-osha-vaccine-mandate-case/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3187</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Laboratories of Democracy: State Trends in Administrative Law</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/laboratories-of-democracy-state-trends-in-administrative-law--53271832</link><description><![CDATA[Louis Brandeis famously wrote that “a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory” for government reform. Today we see many states becoming laboratories for the reform of administrative law. Last year, the Gray Center hosted a roundtable to discuss new research on administrative law in the states. Those papers were recently released as Gray Center Working Papers... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/laboratories-of-democracy-state-trends-in-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1119934</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271832/gray_matters_laboratories_of_democracy_state_trends_in_administrative_law.mp3" length="34440276" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Louis Brandeis famously wrote that “a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory” for government reform. Today we see many states becoming laboratories for the reform of administrative law. Last year, the Gray Center...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Louis Brandeis famously wrote that “a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory” for government reform. Today we see many states becoming laboratories for the reform of administrative law. Last year, the Gray Center hosted a roundtable to discuss new research on administrative law in the states. Those papers were recently released as Gray Center Working Papers... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/laboratories-of-democracy-state-trends-in-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2870</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Pulse of the Court: Recap of the Supreme Court Arguments on the Vaccine-or-Testing Mandate</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-pulse-of-the-court-recap-of-the-supreme-court-arguments-on-the-vaccine-or-testing-mandate--53271860</link><description><![CDATA[On Friday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the legality of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (“OSHA”) vaccination-or-test mandate. The parties challenging the mandate contend that it is unprecedented in the breadth of its assertion of authority. On this podcast, Professor Jenn Mascott, co-director of the Gray Center, interviews Steve Lehotsky of Lehotsky Keller–the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-pulse-of-the-court-recap-of-the-supreme-court-arguments-on-the-vaccine-or-testing-mandate/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1118331</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:11:12 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271860/gray_matters_pulse_of_the_court_ep_1.mp3" length="28533864" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On Friday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the legality of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (“OSHA”) vaccination-or-test mandate. The parties challenging the mandate contend that it is unprecedented in the breadth of its...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On Friday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the legality of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (“OSHA”) vaccination-or-test mandate. The parties challenging the mandate contend that it is unprecedented in the breadth of its assertion of authority. On this podcast, Professor Jenn Mascott, co-director of the Gray Center, interviews Steve Lehotsky of Lehotsky Keller–the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-pulse-of-the-court-recap-of-the-supreme-court-arguments-on-the-vaccine-or-testing-mandate/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2378</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Road to Better Administration: DJ Gribbin on Infrastructure</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-road-to-better-administration-dj-gribbin-on-infrastructure--53271847</link><description><![CDATA[When President Biden signed the new infrastructure law in mid-November, most attention was focused on the money it will spend, and the projects it might fund. But infrastructure expert DJ Gribbin was focused on a subtler part of the law: Title VIII’s provisions for “Federal Permitting Improvement,” which seek to streamline the infrastructure-approval process, making it more efficient and more... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-road-to-better-administration-dj-gribbin-on-infrastructure/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1106253</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:57:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271847/gray_matters_the_road_to_better_administration.mp3" length="32893304" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>When President Biden signed the new infrastructure law in mid-November, most attention was focused on the money it will spend, and the projects it might fund. But infrastructure expert DJ Gribbin was focused on a subtler part of the law: Title VIII’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[When President Biden signed the new infrastructure law in mid-November, most attention was focused on the money it will spend, and the projects it might fund. But infrastructure expert DJ Gribbin was focused on a subtler part of the law: Title VIII’s provisions for “Federal Permitting Improvement,” which seek to streamline the infrastructure-approval process, making it more efficient and more... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-road-to-better-administration-dj-gribbin-on-infrastructure/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2741</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Evening Lecture: Justice Thomas’s Thirty-Year Legacy on the Court</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/evening-lecture-justice-thomas-s-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court--53271868</link><description><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/justice-thomass-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1095518</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 16:52:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271868/gray_matters_justice_thomass_thirty_year_legacy_on_the_court.mp3" length="34861630" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/justice-thomass-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3486</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Advocacy in the Thomas-era Court</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/advocacy-in-the-thomas-era-court--53271842</link><description><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/advocacy-in-the-thomas-era-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1090342</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:09:58 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271842/gray_matters_advocacy_in_the_thomas_era_court_converted.mp3" length="43982232" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/advocacy-in-the-thomas-era-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4399</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Conversation with Michael Pack, producer and developer of the documentary “Created Equal: Justice Thomas in His Own Words” (Justice Thomas’s</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/conversation-with-michael-pack-producer-and-developer-of-the-documentary-created-equal-justice-thomas-in-his-own-words-justice-thomas-s--53271861</link><description><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/conversation-with-michael-pack-producer-and-developer-of-the-documentary-created-equal-justice-thomas-in-his-own-words-justice-thomass-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1090336</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271861/gray_matters_conversation_with_michael_pack_producer_and_developer_of_the_documentary_created_equal_justice_thomas_in_his_own_words.mp3" length="43504243" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/conversation-with-michael-pack-producer-and-developer-of-the-documentary-created-equal-justice-thomas-in-his-own-words-justice-thomass-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3626</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Constitutional Liberties: First Amendment, Religion, Race, and Natural Law (Justice Thomas’s Thirty-Year Legacy on the Court)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/constitutional-liberties-first-amendment-religion-race-and-natural-law-justice-thomas-s-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court--53271911</link><description><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/constitutional-liberties-first-amendment-religion-race-and-natural-law-justice-thomass-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1090332</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:49:37 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271911/gray_matters_constitutional_liberties.mp3" length="53272263" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/constitutional-liberties-first-amendment-religion-race-and-natural-law-justice-thomass-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4440</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Safeguarding the Structural Constitution: Federalism and the Separation of Powers (Justice Thomas’s Thirty-Year Legacy on the Court)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/safeguarding-the-structural-constitution-federalism-and-the-separation-of-powers-justice-thomas-s-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court--53271834</link><description><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/safeguarding-the-structural-constitution-federalism-and-the-separation-of-powers-justice-thomass-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1088022</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:43:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271834/gray_matters_safeguarding_the_structural_constitution.mp3" length="56611026" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 21, 2021, the Gray Center and the Heritage Foundation co-hosted a special event to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the confirmation of Justice Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court of the United States. This event, consisting of a daytime law symposium and evening lecture, brought together jurists, legal academics and practitioners, including many of the Justice’s former clerks... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/safeguarding-the-structural-constitution-federalism-and-the-separation-of-powers-justice-thomass-thirty-year-legacy-on-the-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4718</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Constitutional Presidency: Two New Books (Presidential Administration in a Polarized Era)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-constitutional-presidency-two-new-books-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era--53271877</link><description><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. The fourth and final panel featured two authors of recent books on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-constitutional-presidency-two-new-books-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1075610</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:46:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271877/gray_matters_the_constitutional_presidency_two_new_books.mp3" length="42581597" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. The fourth and final panel featured two authors of recent books on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-constitutional-presidency-two-new-books-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4258</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>saikrishna prakash</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Current Issues in Presidential Administration &amp; Executive Power</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/current-issues-in-presidential-administration-executive-power--53271840</link><description><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. The third panel analyzed current issues in presidential administration... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/current-issues-in-presidential-administration-executive-power/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1075559</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:30:49 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271840/gray_matters_current_issues_in_presidential_administration_executive_power.mp3" length="41846512" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. The third panel analyzed current issues in presidential administration... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/current-issues-in-presidential-administration-executive-power/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4185</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>and christopher j. walker,bijal shah,brian d. feinstein,zachary s. price</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Conversation with D.C. Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, Hosted by Jennifer Mascott (Presidential Administration in a Polarized Era)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/conversation-with-d-c-circuit-judge-neomi-rao-hosted-by-jennifer-mascott-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era--53271901</link><description><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. D.C. Circuit Judge and Gray Center Founder Neomi Rao sat down with Gray... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/conversation-with-d-c-circuit-judge-neomi-rao-hosted-by-jennifer-mascott-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1075487</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:48:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271901/gray_matters_conversation_with_d_c_circuit_judge_neomi_rao.mp3" length="31186724" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. D.C. Circuit Judge and Gray Center Founder Neomi Rao sat down with Gray... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/conversation-with-d-c-circuit-judge-neomi-rao-hosted-by-jennifer-mascott-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3119</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>neomi rao</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Kagan’s “Presidential Administration” After 20 Years (Presidential Administration in a Polarized Era)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/kagan-s-presidential-administration-after-20-years-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era--53271858</link><description><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. The second panel looked at Kagan’s landmark piece... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/kagans-presidential-administration-after-20-years-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1075427</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:00:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271858/gray_matters_kagans_presidential_administration_after_20_years.mp3" length="41926708" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. The second panel looked at Kagan’s landmark piece... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/kagans-presidential-administration-after-20-years-presidential-administration-in-a-polarized-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4193</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>ashraf ahmed,kathryn e. kovacs,kristin e. hickman</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Presidential Administration &amp; Political Polarization</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/presidential-administration-political-polarization--53271848</link><description><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s landmark published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. The first panel was introduced by Gray Center Co-Executive... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/presidential-administration-polarized-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1075331</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:46:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271848/gray_matters_presidential_administration_in_a_polarized_era.mp3" length="45396552" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s landmark published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 1, 2021, the Gray Center hosted a conference to mark the twentieth anniversary of Elena Kagan’s landmark published article on “Presidential Administration,” where authors and scholars discussed and presented seven new working papers and two new books on this important and timely concept, during a series of panel discussions. The first panel was introduced by Gray Center Co-Executive... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/presidential-administration-polarized-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4540</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>christopher j. walker,kevin m. stack,melanie m. marlowe,michael b. rappaport,richard j. pierce jr.</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Keynote Address (Memorial Symposium for Judge Stephen F. Williams)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/keynote-address-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams--53271850</link><description><![CDATA[On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly completed papers at this event, hosted at the Decatur House in Washington, D.C., and followed by a reception where we were all able to continue the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/keynote-address-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1071533</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:12:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271850/gray_matters_judge_williams_symposium_keynote.mp3" length="20896569" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly completed papers at this event, hosted at the Decatur House in Washington, D.C., and followed by a reception where we were all able to continue the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/keynote-address-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2090</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>douglas ginsburg,stephen f. williams</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Williams on the American Constitution and Liberal Democracy (Memorial Symposium for Judge Stephen F. Williams)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-williams-on-the-american-constitution-and-liberal-democracy-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams--53271867</link><description><![CDATA[On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly completed papers at this event, hosted at the Decatur House in Washington, D.C., and followed by a reception where we were all able to continue the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judge-williams-on-the-american-constitution-and-liberal-democracy-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1069604</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:42:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271867/gray_matters_judge_williams_american_constitution_liberal_democracy.mp3" length="42201516" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly completed papers at this event, hosted at the Decatur House in Washington, D.C., and followed by a reception where we were all able to continue the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judge-williams-on-the-american-constitution-and-liberal-democracy-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4220</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judge Williams on Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy (Memorial Symposium for Judge Stephen F. Williams)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judge-williams-on-administrative-law-and-regulatory-policy-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams--53271892</link><description><![CDATA[On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly completed papers at this event, hosted at the Decatur House in Washington, D.C., and followed by a reception where we were all able to continue the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judge-williams-on-administrative-law-and-regulatory-policy-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1067426</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 15:47:49 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271892/panel_1.mp3" length="39906659" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On September 17, 2021, the Gray Center hosted an event in memory of Judge Stephen F. Williams: a conference for new papers written for a symposium on his enormous legacy in law and liberty. We are grateful to our authors, who discussed their newly completed papers at this event, hosted at the Decatur House in Washington, D.C., and followed by a reception where we were all able to continue the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judge-williams-on-administrative-law-and-regulatory-policy-memorial-symposium-for-judge-stephen-f-williams/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3991</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>A Conversation with the Center’s New Co-Executive Director, Prof. Jennifer Mascott</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/a-conversation-with-the-center-s-new-co-executive-director-prof-jennifer-mascott--53271913</link><description><![CDATA[This summer, Professor Jennifer Mascott joined the Gray Center as its new Co-Executive Director. With school back in session, and the Center’s fall programs underway, Jenn visited the podcast for a conversation with our other Co-Executive Director, Adam White. They discussed her current research interests, her recent experience in the Justice Department, and her plans for Gray Center programs... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/a-conversation-with-the-centers-new-co-executive-director-prof-jennifer-mascott/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1050782</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 21:43:45 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271913/gray_matters_mascott.mp3" length="20983296" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This summer, Professor Jennifer Mascott joined the Gray Center as its new Co-Executive Director. With school back in session, and the Center’s fall programs underway, Jenn visited the podcast for a conversation with our other Co-Executive Director,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This summer, Professor Jennifer Mascott joined the Gray Center as its new Co-Executive Director. With school back in session, and the Center’s fall programs underway, Jenn visited the podcast for a conversation with our other Co-Executive Director, Adam White. They discussed her current research interests, her recent experience in the Justice Department, and her plans for Gray Center programs... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/a-conversation-with-the-centers-new-co-executive-director-prof-jennifer-mascott/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2098</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Umpire Strikes Back: A Conversation with Ronald Cass on Judicial Discretion and the Roberts Court</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-umpire-strikes-back-a-conversation-with-ronald-cass-on-judicial-discretion-and-the-roberts-court--53271864</link><description><![CDATA[In his confirmation hearing, Chief Justice John Roberts famously analogized his role to that of an umpire, “to call balls and strikes, and not to pitch or bat.” Dean Ronald Cass argues in a new paper that in three notable decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court— Kisor v. Wilkie, Department of Commerce v. New York, and Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California—Roberts also... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-umpire-strikes-back-a-conversation-with-ronald-cass-on-judicial-discretion-and-the-roberts-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1014178</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:47:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271864/gray_matters_the_umpire_strikes_back.mp3" length="30886577" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In his confirmation hearing, Chief Justice John Roberts famously analogized his role to that of an umpire, “to call balls and strikes, and not to pitch or bat.” Dean Ronald Cass argues in a new paper that in three notable decisions of the U.S. Supreme...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In his confirmation hearing, Chief Justice John Roberts famously analogized his role to that of an umpire, “to call balls and strikes, and not to pitch or bat.” Dean Ronald Cass argues in a new paper that in three notable decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court— Kisor v. Wilkie, Department of Commerce v. New York, and Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California—Roberts also... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-umpire-strikes-back-a-conversation-with-ronald-cass-on-judicial-discretion-and-the-roberts-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3089</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Life of the Law: What Has Happened Since 1946?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-life-of-the-law-what-has-happened-since-1946--53271888</link><description><![CDATA[On June 11, 1946, President Truman signed the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) into law, and it was intended to be “a bill of rights for the hundreds of thousands of Americans whose affairs are controlled or regulated in one way or another by agencies of the Federal Government,” according to its lead sponsor in the Senate. If we were to redesign the APA for today’s version of the administrative... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-life-of-the-law-what-has-happened-since-1946/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=1004137</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:14:13 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271888/gray_matters_what_has_happened_since_1946.mp3" length="50274136" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On June 11, 1946, President Truman signed the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) into law, and it was intended to be “a bill of rights for the hundreds of thousands of Americans whose affairs are controlled or regulated in one way or another by...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On June 11, 1946, President Truman signed the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) into law, and it was intended to be “a bill of rights for the hundreds of thousands of Americans whose affairs are controlled or regulated in one way or another by agencies of the Federal Government,” according to its lead sponsor in the Senate. If we were to redesign the APA for today’s version of the administrative... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-life-of-the-law-what-has-happened-since-1946/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5027</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Creation Stories: What Did the 79th Congress Mean to Accomplish?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/creation-stories-what-did-the-79th-congress-mean-to-accomplish--53271836</link><description><![CDATA[On June 11, 1946, President Truman signed the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) into law, and it was intended to be “a bill of rights for the hundreds of thousands of Americans whose affairs are controlled or regulated in one way or another by agencies of the Federal Government,” according to its lead sponsor in the Senate. If we were to redesign the APA for today’s version of the administrative... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/creation-stories-what-did-the-79th-congress-mean-to-accomplish/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=999316</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 15:49:31 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271836/gray_matters_what_did_the_79th_congress_mean_to_accomplish.mp3" length="54686740" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On June 11, 1946, President Truman signed the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) into law, and it was intended to be “a bill of rights for the hundreds of thousands of Americans whose affairs are controlled or regulated in one way or another by...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On June 11, 1946, President Truman signed the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) into law, and it was intended to be “a bill of rights for the hundreds of thousands of Americans whose affairs are controlled or regulated in one way or another by agencies of the Federal Government,” according to its lead sponsor in the Senate. If we were to redesign the APA for today’s version of the administrative... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/creation-stories-what-did-the-79th-congress-mean-to-accomplish/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5469</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>NEPA and the Future of Clean Energy and Infrastructure</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/nepa-and-the-future-of-clean-energy-and-infrastructure--53271813</link><description><![CDATA[“Do NEPA (the National Environmental Policy Act) and other permitting requirements doom green energy and infrastructure plans?” That was the title of a recent webinar, organized by the Law &amp; Economics Center at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School. The Gray Center’s Adam White moderated a discussion with Mario Loyola (Competitive Enterprise Institute) and Andrew Rosenberg (Union of... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nepa-and-the-future-of-clean-energy-and-infrastructure/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=961787</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 16:01:46 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271813/gray_matters_nepa_clean_energy_infrastructure.mp3" length="37414055" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>“Do NEPA (the National Environmental Policy Act) and other permitting requirements doom green energy and infrastructure plans?” That was the title of a recent webinar, organized by the Law &amp;amp; Economics Center at George Mason University’s Antonin...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[“Do NEPA (the National Environmental Policy Act) and other permitting requirements doom green energy and infrastructure plans?” That was the title of a recent webinar, organized by the Law &amp; Economics Center at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School. The Gray Center’s Adam White moderated a discussion with Mario Loyola (Competitive Enterprise Institute) and Andrew Rosenberg (Union of... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nepa-and-the-future-of-clean-energy-and-infrastructure/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3742</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Rethinking Judicial Deference to Agency Expertise, with Jonathan Adler and E. Donald Elliott</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/rethinking-judicial-deference-to-agency-expertise-with-jonathan-adler-and-e-donald-elliott--53271883</link><description><![CDATA[For the last forty years, courts have been especially deferential to federal agencies’ claims of scientific expertise. And in the last year, we have seen the Supreme Court grapple repeatedly with questions of administrative decisions related to managing the Covid-19 pandemic. How much deference should courts afford agencies on scientific and technical matters? This was among the subjects discussed... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/rethinking-judicial-deference-to-agency-expertise-with-jonathan-adler-and-e-donald-elliott/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=959519</guid><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2021 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271883/gra_matters_rethinking_judicial_deference_to_agency_expertise.mp3" length="37404650" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>For the last forty years, courts have been especially deferential to federal agencies’ claims of scientific expertise. And in the last year, we have seen the Supreme Court grapple repeatedly with questions of administrative decisions related to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[For the last forty years, courts have been especially deferential to federal agencies’ claims of scientific expertise. And in the last year, we have seen the Supreme Court grapple repeatedly with questions of administrative decisions related to managing the Covid-19 pandemic. How much deference should courts afford agencies on scientific and technical matters? This was among the subjects discussed... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/rethinking-judicial-deference-to-agency-expertise-with-jonathan-adler-and-e-donald-elliott/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3741</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Emergency Money: A Discussion on the Paycheck Protection Program with Susan Morse</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/emergency-money-a-discussion-on-the-paycheck-protection-program-with-susan-morse--53271874</link><description><![CDATA[The Paycheck Protection Program was the single largest component of the federal pandemic relief legislation passed in March of 2020. Since then, a debate has developed about the program’s speed-accuracy trade-off, exposing the challenges administrators face when they’re responsible for administering vague statutes in emergency circumstances with little or no information up front. Prof. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/emergency-money-a-discussion-on-the-paycheck-protection-program-with-susan-morse/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=954611</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271874/gray_matters_emergency_money.mp3" length="31048797" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Paycheck Protection Program was the single largest component of the federal pandemic relief legislation passed in March of 2020. Since then, a debate has developed about the program’s speed-accuracy trade-off, exposing the challenges...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Paycheck Protection Program was the single largest component of the federal pandemic relief legislation passed in March of 2020. Since then, a debate has developed about the program’s speed-accuracy trade-off, exposing the challenges administrators face when they’re responsible for administering vague statutes in emergency circumstances with little or no information up front. Prof. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/emergency-money-a-discussion-on-the-paycheck-protection-program-with-susan-morse/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3105</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Regulating Vaccines After Covid-19: A Conversation with Sam Halabi and Kristen Osenga</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/regulating-vaccines-after-covid-19-a-conversation-with-sam-halabi-and-kristen-osenga--53271820</link><description><![CDATA[Amid the Covid-19 crisis, Operation Warp Speed helped to develop vaccines with astonishing speed. But even with a fast-tracked FDA process, there still remain significant questions about risk, liability, and intellectual property. These are the subjects of two new Gray Center working papers by Professors Sam Halabi of the University of Missouri and Professor Kristen Osenga of the University of... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulating-vaccines-after-covid-19-a-conversation-with-sam-halabi-and-kristen-osenga/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=949313</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 16:00:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271820/gray_matters_regulating_vaccines.mp3" length="31562887" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Amid the Covid-19 crisis, Operation Warp Speed helped to develop vaccines with astonishing speed. But even with a fast-tracked FDA process, there still remain significant questions about risk, liability, and intellectual property. These are the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Amid the Covid-19 crisis, Operation Warp Speed helped to develop vaccines with astonishing speed. But even with a fast-tracked FDA process, there still remain significant questions about risk, liability, and intellectual property. These are the subjects of two new Gray Center working papers by Professors Sam Halabi of the University of Missouri and Professor Kristen Osenga of the University of... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulating-vaccines-after-covid-19-a-conversation-with-sam-halabi-and-kristen-osenga/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3156</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>“By Executive Order,” with Andrew Rudalevige on Presidential Administration and Bureaucracy</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/by-executive-order-with-andrew-rudalevige-on-presidential-administration-and-bureaucracy--53271827</link><description><![CDATA[Executive orders are not a new tool of presidential power — all presidents have used them, and some much more than others. But in recent decades they seem to have become a more significant and prominent aspect of American government. In today’s episode, Bowdoin College’s Andrew Rudalevige and the Gray Center’s Adam White describe the processes of E.O. development, with special focus on the Office... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/by-executive-order-with-andrew-rudalevige-on-presidential-administration-and-bureaucracy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=944786</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:07:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271827/gray_matters_by_executive_order.mp3" length="37339083" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Executive orders are not a new tool of presidential power — all presidents have used them, and some much more than others. But in recent decades they seem to have become a more significant and prominent aspect of American government. In today’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Executive orders are not a new tool of presidential power — all presidents have used them, and some much more than others. But in recent decades they seem to have become a more significant and prominent aspect of American government. In today’s episode, Bowdoin College’s Andrew Rudalevige and the Gray Center’s Adam White describe the processes of E.O. development, with special focus on the Office... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/by-executive-order-with-andrew-rudalevige-on-presidential-administration-and-bureaucracy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3734</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Nondelegation’s Past, Present, and Future: Kristin Hickman and Nicholas Parrillo</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/nondelegation-s-past-present-and-future-kristin-hickman-and-nicholas-parrillo--53271830</link><description><![CDATA[At least five Supreme Court justices seem interested in reconsidering the current version of the “Nondelegation Doctrine.” And their recent judicial opinions have inspired waves of new scholarship for and against judicial reform. Last spring, the Gray Center invited scholars to workshop new papers on the nondelegation doctrine; now those articles are online in our Working Paper Series... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nondelegations-past-present-and-future-kristin-hickman-and-nicholas-parrillo/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=920396</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271830/gray_matters_nondelegation.mp3" length="44286087" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>At least five Supreme Court justices seem interested in reconsidering the current version of the “Nondelegation Doctrine.” And their recent judicial opinions have inspired waves of new scholarship for and against judicial reform. Last spring, the Gray...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[At least five Supreme Court justices seem interested in reconsidering the current version of the “Nondelegation Doctrine.” And their recent judicial opinions have inspired waves of new scholarship for and against judicial reform. Last spring, the Gray Center invited scholars to workshop new papers on the nondelegation doctrine; now those articles are online in our Working Paper Series... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/nondelegations-past-present-and-future-kristin-hickman-and-nicholas-parrillo/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4429</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Future of Financial Regulation in the Biden Administration</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-future-of-financial-regulation-in-the-biden-administration--53271907</link><description><![CDATA[The Biden Administration faces immensely consequential policy choices on questions of financial regulation—from the proper regulatory standards to apply to banks for the sake of safety, soundness, and systemic risk; to cryptocurrencies; to the use of financial regulatory agencies to drive policy on non-financial issues. And as the Gamestop/Robinhood saga highlighted, new technologies can radically... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-financial-regulation-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=915827</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:34:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271907/gray_matters_the_future_of_financial_regulation_in_the_biden_administration_1.mp3" length="55291298" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Biden Administration faces immensely consequential policy choices on questions of financial regulation—from the proper regulatory standards to apply to banks for the sake of safety, soundness, and systemic risk; to cryptocurrencies; to the use of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Biden Administration faces immensely consequential policy choices on questions of financial regulation—from the proper regulatory standards to apply to banks for the sake of safety, soundness, and systemic risk; to cryptocurrencies; to the use of financial regulatory agencies to drive policy on non-financial issues. And as the Gamestop/Robinhood saga highlighted, new technologies can radically... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-financial-regulation-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5530</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Future of Police Reform and Civil Rights in the Biden Administration</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-future-of-police-reform-and-civil-rights-in-the-biden-administration--53271852</link><description><![CDATA[Throughout his presidential campaign, Joe Biden called for national reforms to police practices and civil rights. Immediately after the election, his transition team highlighted Racial Equity as one of its four policy priorities. And right after his inauguration, he signed a set of initial executive actions focused generally on discrimination. Yet at the same time, he has argued that the focus... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-police-reform-and-civil-rights-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=909287</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 21:17:40 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271852/gray_matters_future_police_reform_civil_rights.mp3" length="53646544" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Throughout his presidential campaign, Joe Biden called for national reforms to police practices and civil rights. Immediately after the election, his transition team highlighted Racial Equity as one of its four policy priorities. And right after his...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Throughout his presidential campaign, Joe Biden called for national reforms to police practices and civil rights. Immediately after the election, his transition team highlighted Racial Equity as one of its four policy priorities. And right after his inauguration, he signed a set of initial executive actions focused generally on discrimination. Yet at the same time, he has argued that the focus... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-police-reform-and-civil-rights-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5365</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Past, Present, and Future of Financial Regulation: Peter Conti-Brown and Lev Menand</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-past-present-and-future-of-financial-regulation-peter-conti-brown-and-lev-menand--53271910</link><description><![CDATA[From George Washington’s administration onward, the federal government’s power over financial markets and banks has always occupied a nebulous corner of American constitutional government. Recently the Gray Center posted three new working papers exploring different aspects of financial and monetary regulation. In this podcast, Adam White chats with two of the authors: Columbia Law School’s Lev... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-past-present-and-future-of-financial-regulation-peter-conti-brown-and-lev-menand/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=905909</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:34:38 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271910/gray_matters_past_present_future_financial_regulations.mp3" length="33294806" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>From George Washington’s administration onward, the federal government’s power over financial markets and banks has always occupied a nebulous corner of American constitutional government. Recently the Gray Center posted three new working papers...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[From George Washington’s administration onward, the federal government’s power over financial markets and banks has always occupied a nebulous corner of American constitutional government. Recently the Gray Center posted three new working papers exploring different aspects of financial and monetary regulation. In this podcast, Adam White chats with two of the authors: Columbia Law School’s Lev... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-past-present-and-future-of-financial-regulation-peter-conti-brown-and-lev-menand/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3330</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Future of Tech Policy in the Biden Administration</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-future-of-tech-policy-in-the-biden-administration--53271882</link><description><![CDATA[“Tech policy” is a broad and nebulous label. But from antitrust to national security to social media moderation, recent years have been filled with difficult questions about federal law and policy, and myriad proposals for major new regulatory initiatives surrounding new technologies and big tech companies. Moreover, these debates scramble familiar partisan and ideological lines. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-tech-policy-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=900512</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:36:26 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271882/gray_matters_future_tech_policy.mp3" length="48371638" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>“Tech policy” is a broad and nebulous label. But from antitrust to national security to social media moderation, recent years have been filled with difficult questions about federal law and policy, and myriad proposals for major new regulatory...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[“Tech policy” is a broad and nebulous label. But from antitrust to national security to social media moderation, recent years have been filled with difficult questions about federal law and policy, and myriad proposals for major new regulatory initiatives surrounding new technologies and big tech companies. Moreover, these debates scramble familiar partisan and ideological lines. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-tech-policy-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4837</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Future of Environmental and Energy Policy in the Biden Administration</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-future-of-environmental-and-energy-policy-in-the-biden-administration--53271871</link><description><![CDATA[Promptly after the election, President-elect Joe Biden’s official “transition” team announced that climate change would be one of the new administration’s top four policy priorities. The transition’s website listed a variety of familiar and new ways in which the Biden administration intends to grapple with this issue. And, of course, this is just one of several issues of energy and environmental... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-environmental-and-energy-policy-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=874742</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271871/gray_matters_environmental_energy_policy.mp3" length="46711557" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Promptly after the election, President-elect Joe Biden’s official “transition” team announced that climate change would be one of the new administration’s top four policy priorities. The transition’s website listed a variety of familiar and new ways...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Promptly after the election, President-elect Joe Biden’s official “transition” team announced that climate change would be one of the new administration’s top four policy priorities. The transition’s website listed a variety of familiar and new ways in which the Biden administration intends to grapple with this issue. And, of course, this is just one of several issues of energy and environmental... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-environmental-and-energy-policy-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4671</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight in the Biden Administration</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-future-of-white-house-regulatory-oversight-in-the-biden-administration--53271927</link><description><![CDATA[Over the last four years, the Trump administration continued the longstanding framework for OIRA regulatory oversight, but it also developed new oversight tools, such as the new regulatory budgeting framework of Executive Order 13771. How will the new Biden Administration structure its own frameworks for regulatory oversight? What old and new tools will it keep? And what new innovations might it... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-white-house-regulatory-oversight-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=869693</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:48:42 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271927/gray_matters_future_regulatory_reform.mp3" length="48966708" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Over the last four years, the Trump administration continued the longstanding framework for OIRA regulatory oversight, but it also developed new oversight tools, such as the new regulatory budgeting framework of Executive Order 13771. How will the new...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Over the last four years, the Trump administration continued the longstanding framework for OIRA regulatory oversight, but it also developed new oversight tools, such as the new regulatory budgeting framework of Executive Order 13771. How will the new Biden Administration structure its own frameworks for regulatory oversight? What old and new tools will it keep? And what new innovations might it... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-future-of-white-house-regulatory-oversight-in-the-biden-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4897</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>“Reviving Rationality” with Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/reviving-rationality-with-michael-livermore-and-richard-revesz--53271912</link><description><![CDATA[In 2008, Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz wrote Retaking Rationality, a book arguing that cost-benefit analysis of regulations should be recognized not as an anti-regulatory weapon, but rather a nonideological tool for promoting good government. Now they return with a new book, Reviving Rationality, which analyzes developments since 2008, and proposes further reforms for cost-benefit analysis... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/reviving-rationality-with-michael-livermore-and-richard-revesz/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=827680</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271912/arbitrary_capricious_reviving_rationality.mp3" length="35759197" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In 2008, Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz wrote Retaking Rationality, a book arguing that cost-benefit analysis of regulations should be recognized not as an anti-regulatory weapon, but rather a nonideological tool for promoting good government....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In 2008, Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz wrote Retaking Rationality, a book arguing that cost-benefit analysis of regulations should be recognized not as an anti-regulatory weapon, but rather a nonideological tool for promoting good government. Now they return with a new book, Reviving Rationality, which analyzes developments since 2008, and proposes further reforms for cost-benefit analysis... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/reviving-rationality-with-michael-livermore-and-richard-revesz/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3576</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Unrule of Law as the Law of Unrules, with Cary Coglianese and Daniel Walters</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-unrule-of-law-as-the-law-of-unrules-with-cary-coglianese-and-daniel-walters--53271924</link><description><![CDATA[Governments make rules. But governments often grant exemptions from those rules, either when the rules are written or in the ways they are enforced. And those exemptions are the subject of a new article: “ Unrules” by Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, and Daniel Walters. Professors Coglianese and Walters are our guests today. They describe the two main categories of unrules (“dispensations” and... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-unrule-of-law-as-the-law-of-unrules-with-cary-coglianese-and-daniel-walters/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=822383</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:45:17 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271924/arbitrary_capricious_unrules.mp3" length="54654348" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Governments make rules. But governments often grant exemptions from those rules, either when the rules are written or in the ways they are enforced. And those exemptions are the subject of a new article: “ Unrules” by Cary Coglianese, Gabriel...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Governments make rules. But governments often grant exemptions from those rules, either when the rules are written or in the ways they are enforced. And those exemptions are the subject of a new article: “ Unrules” by Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, and Daniel Walters. Professors Coglianese and Walters are our guests today. They describe the two main categories of unrules (“dispensations” and... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-unrule-of-law-as-the-law-of-unrules-with-cary-coglianese-and-daniel-walters/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2733</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>How Chief Justice Taft Wrote the Famous Myers Opinion, with Robert Post</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/how-chief-justice-taft-wrote-the-famous-myers-opinion-with-robert-post--53271873</link><description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Seila Law v. CFPB, and the upcoming case of Collins v. Mnuchin, return our attention to the Constitution’s allocation of powers among the President and Congress—and to the famous cases nearly a century ago when the Supreme Court tried to grapple with those issues amid the rise of the modern administrative state. As it happens, Professor Robert Post of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/how-chief-justice-taft-wrote-the-famous-myers-opinion-with-robert-post/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=820583</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 15:00:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271873/arbitrary_capricious_chief_justice_taft_myers_opinion.mp3" length="29474136" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Seila Law v. CFPB, and the upcoming case of Collins v. Mnuchin, return our attention to the Constitution’s allocation of powers among the President and Congress—and to the famous cases nearly a century ago when...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Seila Law v. CFPB, and the upcoming case of Collins v. Mnuchin, return our attention to the Constitution’s allocation of powers among the President and Congress—and to the famous cases nearly a century ago when the Supreme Court tried to grapple with those issues amid the rise of the modern administrative state. As it happens, Professor Robert Post of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/how-chief-justice-taft-wrote-the-famous-myers-opinion-with-robert-post/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2947</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Annual Supreme Court Preview: 2020–2021</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/annual-supreme-court-preview-2020-2021--53271875</link><description><![CDATA[Last summer, the Supreme Court ended its year’s work with significant decisions involving administrative agencies. This new year now underway is set to include major cases involving agency structure and independence; transparency; and a host of other issues. To discuss these issues and broader themes of administrative governance, the Gray Center’s annual Supreme Court preview featured three... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/annual-supreme-court-preview-2020-2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=818409</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:13:52 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271875/arbitrary_capricious_supreme_court_preview.mp3" length="39486610" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Last summer, the Supreme Court ended its year’s work with significant decisions involving administrative agencies. This new year now underway is set to include major cases involving agency structure and independence; transparency; and a host of other...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Last summer, the Supreme Court ended its year’s work with significant decisions involving administrative agencies. This new year now underway is set to include major cases involving agency structure and independence; transparency; and a host of other issues. To discuss these issues and broader themes of administrative governance, the Gray Center’s annual Supreme Court preview featured three... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/annual-supreme-court-preview-2020-2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3949</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Clean Air Act and the Transformation of Congress: Frank Manheim and David Schoenbrod (Congress and the Administrative State Series)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-clean-air-act-and-the-transformation-of-congress-frank-manheim-and-david-schoenbrod-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series--53271885</link><description><![CDATA[Congress’s enactment of the Clean Air Act fifty years ago was meant to change our environmental impacts — but did it change Congress, too? That is the question that Prof. Frank Manheim of George Mason University’s Schar School of Public Policy asks in his new working paper, “ Transformation of Congressional Lawmaking by the Clean Air Act of 1970 and Its Effects.” In this episode, part of the Gray... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-clean-air-act-and-the-transformation-of-congress-frank-manheim-and-david-schoenbrod-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=817906</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:56:51 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271885/arbitrary_capricious_the_clean_air_act.mp3" length="24271851" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Congress’s enactment of the Clean Air Act fifty years ago was meant to change our environmental impacts — but did it change Congress, too? That is the question that Prof. Frank Manheim of George Mason University’s Schar School of Public Policy asks in...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Congress’s enactment of the Clean Air Act fifty years ago was meant to change our environmental impacts — but did it change Congress, too? That is the question that Prof. Frank Manheim of George Mason University’s Schar School of Public Policy asks in his new working paper, “ Transformation of Congressional Lawmaking by the Clean Air Act of 1970 and Its Effects.” In this episode, part of the Gray... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-clean-air-act-and-the-transformation-of-congress-frank-manheim-and-david-schoenbrod-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2427</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Thinking About “The Congressional Bureaucracy,” with Abbe Gluck, Jesse Cross, and Josh Chafetz (Congress and the Administrative State Series</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/thinking-about-the-congressional-bureaucracy-with-abbe-gluck-jesse-cross-and-josh-chafetz-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series--53271884</link><description><![CDATA[The executive branch’s bureaucracy gets a lot of attention. But Congress’s bureaucracy gets much less—yet it is extremely important. In a new Gray Center working paper titled “ The Congressional Bureaucracy,” Professors Abbe Gluck and Jesse Cross analyze several parts of Congress’s bureaucracy—some well-known, like the Government Accountability Office, and others less so, like the Office of Law... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/thinking-about-the-congressional-bureaucracy-with-abbe-gluck-jesse-cross-and-josh-chafetz-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=817258</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271884/arbitrary_capricious_the_congressional_bureaucracy.mp3" length="29901500" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The executive branch’s bureaucracy gets a lot of attention. But Congress’s bureaucracy gets much less—yet it is extremely important. In a new Gray Center working paper titled “ The Congressional Bureaucracy,” Professors Abbe Gluck and Jesse Cross...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The executive branch’s bureaucracy gets a lot of attention. But Congress’s bureaucracy gets much less—yet it is extremely important. In a new Gray Center working paper titled “ The Congressional Bureaucracy,” Professors Abbe Gluck and Jesse Cross analyze several parts of Congress’s bureaucracy—some well-known, like the Government Accountability Office, and others less so, like the Office of Law... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/thinking-about-the-congressional-bureaucracy-with-abbe-gluck-jesse-cross-and-josh-chafetz-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2990</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Congress and Cost-Benefit Analysis, with Caroline Cecot and Ricky Revesz (Congress and the Administrative State Series)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/congress-and-cost-benefit-analysis-with-caroline-cecot-and-ricky-revesz-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series--53271878</link><description><![CDATA[We often think of modern cost-benefit analysis as being a requirement primarily of executive orders, not statutes. Needless to say, Executive Order 12291 and 12866, and other executive orders and presidential documents, are of central importance. But Congress has done much on matters of cost-benefit analysis, too, often requiring agencies to consider costs and benefits... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/congress-and-cost-benefit-analysis-with-caroline-cecot-and-ricky-revesz-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=816066</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:14:19 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271878/arbitrary_capricious_congress_cost_benefit_analysis.mp3" length="28361581" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>We often think of modern cost-benefit analysis as being a requirement primarily of executive orders, not statutes. Needless to say, Executive Order 12291 and 12866, and other executive orders and presidential documents, are of central importance. But...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[We often think of modern cost-benefit analysis as being a requirement primarily of executive orders, not statutes. Needless to say, Executive Order 12291 and 12866, and other executive orders and presidential documents, are of central importance. But Congress has done much on matters of cost-benefit analysis, too, often requiring agencies to consider costs and benefits... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/congress-and-cost-benefit-analysis-with-caroline-cecot-and-ricky-revesz-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2836</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Congressional Reform from 1981 Onward: Philip Wallach and Molly Reynolds (Congress and the Administrative State Series)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/congressional-reform-from-1981-onward-philip-wallach-and-molly-reynolds-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series--53271896</link><description><![CDATA[In 1994, Republicans won control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 50 years. Upon taking office, Speaker Newt Gingrich and his colleagues undertook major institutional reforms. What do those reforms tell us about conservatives’ modern views of the Constitution’s first branch of government, and how did those reforms affect Congress’s relationship to the President and... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/congressional-reform-from-1981-onward-philip-wallach-and-molly-reynolds-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=814883</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:50:10 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271896/arbitrary_capricious_congressional_reform_wallach_reynolds.mp3" length="30856536" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In 1994, Republicans won control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 50 years. Upon taking office, Speaker Newt Gingrich and his colleagues undertook major institutional reforms. What do those reforms tell us about conservatives’...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In 1994, Republicans won control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 50 years. Upon taking office, Speaker Newt Gingrich and his colleagues undertook major institutional reforms. What do those reforms tell us about conservatives’ modern views of the Constitution’s first branch of government, and how did those reforms affect Congress’s relationship to the President and... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/congressional-reform-from-1981-onward-philip-wallach-and-molly-reynolds-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3086</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>congress and the administrativ,congressional reform,molly reynolds,philip wallach</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>“The Decision of 1946: The Legislative Reorganization Act and the APA,” with Joseph Postell and Jeremy Rabkin (Congress and the Administrati</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-decision-of-1946-the-legislative-reorganization-act-and-the-apa-with-joseph-postell-and-jeremy-rabkin-congress-and-the-administrati--53271876</link><description><![CDATA[Administrative Law scholars think of 1946 as the year that Congress enacted the Administrative Procedure Act. But too often we neglect another major law that Congress enacted in that year: the Legislative Reorganization Act. The LRA was intended to position Congress for long-term management of the administrative state. But its proponents were disappointed to see major provisions dropped from the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-decision-of-1946-the-legislative-reorganization-act-and-the-apa-with-joseph-postell-and-jeremy-rabkin-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=813907</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:40:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271876/arbitrary_capricious_legislative_reorganization_act_and_the_apa.mp3" length="26859018" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Administrative Law scholars think of 1946 as the year that Congress enacted the Administrative Procedure Act. But too often we neglect another major law that Congress enacted in that year: the Legislative Reorganization Act. The LRA was intended to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Administrative Law scholars think of 1946 as the year that Congress enacted the Administrative Procedure Act. But too often we neglect another major law that Congress enacted in that year: the Legislative Reorganization Act. The LRA was intended to position Congress for long-term management of the administrative state. But its proponents were disappointed to see major provisions dropped from the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-decision-of-1946-the-legislative-reorganization-act-and-the-apa-with-joseph-postell-and-jeremy-rabkin-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2686</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>administrative procedure act,antonin scalia law school,arbitrary &amp; capricious,congress and the administrativ,hillsdale college,jeremy rabkin,joseph postell,legislative reorganization act</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Joshua Wright on “Weaponizing Antitrust” Against Tech Companies</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/joshua-wright-on-weaponizing-antitrust-against-tech-companies--53271895</link><description><![CDATA[Today’s guest is Professor Joshua Wright — a University Professor of Law at George Mason University, Director of the law school’s Global Antitrust Institute, a former FTC Commissioner, and one of the nation’s leading scholars of antitrust law and policy. Professor Wright and Jan Rybnicek recently co-authored an essay on recent calls to use antitrust law to regulate or break up “big tech” companies. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/joshua-wright-on-weaponizing-antitrust-against-tech-companies/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=812263</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271895/arbitrary_capriciousweaponizing_antitrust.mp3" length="32596553" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Today’s guest is Professor Joshua Wright — a University Professor of Law at George Mason University, Director of the law school’s Global Antitrust Institute, a former FTC Commissioner, and one of the nation’s leading scholars of antitrust law and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Today’s guest is Professor Joshua Wright — a University Professor of Law at George Mason University, Director of the law school’s Global Antitrust Institute, a former FTC Commissioner, and one of the nation’s leading scholars of antitrust law and policy. Professor Wright and Jan Rybnicek recently co-authored an essay on recent calls to use antitrust law to regulate or break up “big tech” companies. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/joshua-wright-on-weaponizing-antitrust-against-tech-companies/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3260</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>After 50 Years, What Is the National Environmental Policy Act Today?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/after-50-years-what-is-the-national-environmental-policy-act-today--53271899</link><description><![CDATA[On September 24, 2020, the Gray Center co-hosted a live webinar, “After 50 Years, What Is the National Environmental Policy Act Today?” in partnership with Antonin Scalia Law School’s Society for Environmental and Energy Law. On January 1, 1970, President Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) into law. A briefly worded but powerful law, NEPA requires federal agencies to... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/after-50-years-what-is-the-national-environmental-policy-act-today/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=810169</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 18:04:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271899/arbitrary_capricious_national_environmental_policy_act.mp3" length="37116520" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On September 24, 2020, the Gray Center co-hosted a live webinar, “After 50 Years, What Is the National Environmental Policy Act Today?” in partnership with Antonin Scalia Law School’s Society for Environmental and Energy Law. On January 1, 1970,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On September 24, 2020, the Gray Center co-hosted a live webinar, “After 50 Years, What Is the National Environmental Policy Act Today?” in partnership with Antonin Scalia Law School’s Society for Environmental and Energy Law. On January 1, 1970, President Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) into law. A briefly worded but powerful law, NEPA requires federal agencies to... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/after-50-years-what-is-the-national-environmental-policy-act-today/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3712</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Adam Mossoff on the Innovation Economy and the Administrative State</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/adam-mossoff-on-the-innovation-economy-and-the-administrative-state--53271839</link><description><![CDATA[Today’s guest is Professor Adam Mossoff, a leading scholar of intellectual property and Co-Founder of Scalia Law’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP). Three years ago, CPIP and the Gray Center co-hosted a major conference on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), a new regulatory body empowered to revoke companies’ patents through an administrative process instead of a... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/adam-mossoff-on-the-innovation-economy-and-the-administrative-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=808524</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 15:29:46 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271839/adam_mossoff_innovation_economy_administrative_state.mp3" length="35506593" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Today’s guest is Professor Adam Mossoff, a leading scholar of intellectual property and Co-Founder of Scalia Law’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP). Three years ago, CPIP and the Gray Center co-hosted a major conference on the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Today’s guest is Professor Adam Mossoff, a leading scholar of intellectual property and Co-Founder of Scalia Law’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP). Three years ago, CPIP and the Gray Center co-hosted a major conference on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), a new regulatory body empowered to revoke companies’ patents through an administrative process instead of a... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/adam-mossoff-on-the-innovation-economy-and-the-administrative-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3551</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Teaching Administrative Law Outside the Classroom: Ballotpedia’s Christopher Nelson</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/teaching-administrative-law-outside-the-classroom-ballotpedia-s-christopher-nelson--53271921</link><description><![CDATA[We admit it, administrative law is a complicated subject — and, some say, a notoriously dull one. AdLaw is often a challenging subject to teach in the classroom, and even more challenging outside of it. The Gray Center is only one of several institutions that attempt to bring these issues to non-specialists. Another is Ballotpedia.org: Two years ago it created an Administrative State Project to... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/teaching-administrative-law-outside-the-classroom-ballotpedias-christopher-nelson/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=804568</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:02:30 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271921/arbitrary_capricious_ballotpedia.mp3" length="19786626" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>We admit it, administrative law is a complicated subject — and, some say, a notoriously dull one. AdLaw is often a challenging subject to teach in the classroom, and even more challenging outside of it. The Gray Center is only one of several...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[We admit it, administrative law is a complicated subject — and, some say, a notoriously dull one. AdLaw is often a challenging subject to teach in the classroom, and even more challenging outside of it. The Gray Center is only one of several institutions that attempt to bring these issues to non-specialists. Another is Ballotpedia.org: Two years ago it created an Administrative State Project to... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/teaching-administrative-law-outside-the-classroom-ballotpedias-christopher-nelson/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1979</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tech Regulation Series Keynote Conversation with FTC Commissioner Noah Phillips</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tech-regulation-series-keynote-conversation-with-ftc-commissioner-noah-phillips--53271866</link><description><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission is a century-old agency facing some of the most cutting-edge technologies and issues of our time. How should an agency apply old laws to new technologies? To conclude the Gray Center’s series of podcast conversations on innovation and regulation, Commissioner Noah Phillips joins Adam White to discuss issues ranging from the nondelegation doctrine... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/tech-regulation-series-keynote-conversation-with-ftc-commissioner-noah-phillips/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=802368</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:03:59 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271866/arbitrary_capricious_keynote_conversation_with_ftc_commissioner_noah_phillips.mp3" length="28466593" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The Federal Trade Commission is a century-old agency facing some of the most cutting-edge technologies and issues of our time. How should an agency apply old laws to new technologies? To conclude the Gray Center’s series of podcast conversations on...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission is a century-old agency facing some of the most cutting-edge technologies and issues of our time. How should an agency apply old laws to new technologies? To conclude the Gray Center’s series of podcast conversations on innovation and regulation, Commissioner Noah Phillips joins Adam White to discuss issues ranging from the nondelegation doctrine... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/tech-regulation-series-keynote-conversation-with-ftc-commissioner-noah-phillips/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2847</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Rethinking Regulatory Paradigms in a High-Tech Era (Tech Regulation Series)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/rethinking-regulatory-paradigms-in-a-high-tech-era-tech-regulation-series--53271891</link><description><![CDATA[During this era of disruptive technological change, heavy-handed regulation can stifle innovation and unintentionally undermine the public interest. Yet regulators are tasked by Congress with promoting particular policies, often under old statutes with outdated information. How can regulators best do their jobs in a way that promotes innovation and the public interest? In a pair of new Gray Center... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/rethinking-regulatory-paradigms-in-a-high-tech-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=802222</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:01:11 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271891/arbitrary_capricious_new_forms_of_regulatory_process.mp3" length="38266691" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>During this era of disruptive technological change, heavy-handed regulation can stifle innovation and unintentionally undermine the public interest. Yet regulators are tasked by Congress with promoting particular policies, often under old statutes...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[During this era of disruptive technological change, heavy-handed regulation can stifle innovation and unintentionally undermine the public interest. Yet regulators are tasked by Congress with promoting particular policies, often under old statutes with outdated information. How can regulators best do their jobs in a way that promotes innovation and the public interest? In a pair of new Gray Center... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/rethinking-regulatory-paradigms-in-a-high-tech-era/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3827</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>AirBNB and Local Regulators (Tech Regulation Series)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/airbnb-and-local-regulators-tech-regulation-series--53271889</link><description><![CDATA[Conversations about “the administrative state” usually focus on federal regulators, but for many upstart tech companies, local regulation often presents the most significant challenges. Uber and Lyft, for example, famously collided with local taxicab regulations. And “short-term rental” companies like AirBNB have faced countless regulations from countless regulators. That is the subject of a new... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/airbnb-and-local-regulators/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=792528</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:02:26 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271889/tech_regulation_series_airbnb_and_local_regulators.mp3" length="17092394" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Conversations about “the administrative state” usually focus on federal regulators, but for many upstart tech companies, local regulation often presents the most significant challenges. Uber and Lyft, for example, famously collided with local taxicab...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Conversations about “the administrative state” usually focus on federal regulators, but for many upstart tech companies, local regulation often presents the most significant challenges. Uber and Lyft, for example, famously collided with local taxicab regulations. And “short-term rental” companies like AirBNB have faced countless regulations from countless regulators. That is the subject of a new... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/airbnb-and-local-regulators/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2861</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>"Section 230" and the Regulation of Web Sites (Tech Regulation Series)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/section-230-and-the-regulation-of-web-sites-tech-regulation-series--53271919</link><description><![CDATA[Nearly 25 years ago, Congress enacted Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, declaring web sites would not be treated as “publishers” in posting third-party statements, and that their “good faith” efforts to edit or moderate content would not expose them to legal liability. In those days, this legal protection helped the early generation of Internet web sites grow and change the world. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/section-230-and-the-regulation-of-web-sites/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=801104</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271919/arbitrary_capricious_section_230.mp3" length="28806708" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Nearly 25 years ago, Congress enacted Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, declaring web sites would not be treated as “publishers” in posting third-party statements, and that their “good faith” efforts to edit or moderate content would not...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Nearly 25 years ago, Congress enacted Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, declaring web sites would not be treated as “publishers” in posting third-party statements, and that their “good faith” efforts to edit or moderate content would not expose them to legal liability. In those days, this legal protection helped the early generation of Internet web sites grow and change the world. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/section-230-and-the-regulation-of-web-sites/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2881</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Common Good: Rebuilding Trust and Rebooting the System with Philip Howard</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-common-good-rebuilding-trust-and-rebooting-the-system-with-philip-howard--53271922</link><description><![CDATA[Philip Howard, a lawyer and author, founded Common Good to call for fundamental reform of America’s bureaucratic, legal, and political institutions. And he sees the nation’s most recent controversies—government responses to Covid-19, and episodes of police misconduct—as exemplifying the breakdown of governance and social trust. In a July op-ed for USA Today, he wrote that “America needs a new... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-common-good-rebuilding-trust-and-rebooting-the-system-with-philip-howard/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=799587</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:00:30 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271922/arbitrary_capricious_philip_howard_common_good.mp3" length="28265535" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Philip Howard, a lawyer and author, founded Common Good to call for fundamental reform of America’s bureaucratic, legal, and political institutions. And he sees the nation’s most recent controversies—government responses to Covid-19, and episodes of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Philip Howard, a lawyer and author, founded Common Good to call for fundamental reform of America’s bureaucratic, legal, and political institutions. And he sees the nation’s most recent controversies—government responses to Covid-19, and episodes of police misconduct—as exemplifying the breakdown of governance and social trust. In a July op-ed for USA Today, he wrote that “America needs a new... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-common-good-rebuilding-trust-and-rebooting-the-system-with-philip-howard/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2827</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Minutes to Midnight, or Four More Years: The Regulatory Agenda with Bridget Dooling &amp; Philip Wallach</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/minutes-to-midnight-or-four-more-years-the-regulatory-agenda-with-bridget-dooling-philip-wallach--53271862</link><description><![CDATA[The fourth year of any presidential term is driven by a sense of urgency, and the administration’s regulatory or deregulatory agenda is no exception. President Trump’s fourth year has been further complicated by the Covid-19 outbreak, and the administration’s regulatory and deregulatory responses. To put the last few months into perspective and to look ahead to the coming months... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/minutes-to-midnight-or-four-more-years-the-regulatory-agenda-with-bridget-dooling-philip-wallach/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=789999</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 23:06:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271862/arbitrary_capricious_dooling_wallach.mp3" length="13212304" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The fourth year of any presidential term is driven by a sense of urgency, and the administration’s regulatory or deregulatory agenda is no exception. President Trump’s fourth year has been further complicated by the Covid-19 outbreak, and the...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The fourth year of any presidential term is driven by a sense of urgency, and the administration’s regulatory or deregulatory agenda is no exception. President Trump’s fourth year has been further complicated by the Covid-19 outbreak, and the administration’s regulatory and deregulatory responses. To put the last few months into perspective and to look ahead to the coming months... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/minutes-to-midnight-or-four-more-years-the-regulatory-agenda-with-bridget-dooling-philip-wallach/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2211</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>regulation,regulatory/administrative stat</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Executive Privilege: A Discussion with Dean Mark Rozell</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/executive-privilege-a-discussion-with-dean-mark-rozell--53271845</link><description><![CDATA[The words “executive privilege” are not found in the Constitution, but some form of presidential secrecy has been asserted by presidents from George Washington onward. The Supreme Court’s latest term ended with major decisions in two cases involving executive privilege: Trump v. Mazars USA, involving subpoenas from the House of Representatives; and Trump v. Vance, involving subpoenas from a New... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/executive-privilege-a-discussion-with-dean-mark-rozell/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=782273</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271845/arbitrary_and_capricious.mp3" length="41978256" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The words “executive privilege” are not found in the Constitution, but some form of presidential secrecy has been asserted by presidents from George Washington onward. The Supreme Court’s latest term ended with major decisions in two cases involving...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The words “executive privilege” are not found in the Constitution, but some form of presidential secrecy has been asserted by presidents from George Washington onward. The Supreme Court’s latest term ended with major decisions in two cases involving executive privilege: Trump v. Mazars USA, involving subpoenas from the House of Representatives; and Trump v. Vance, involving subpoenas from a New... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/executive-privilege-a-discussion-with-dean-mark-rozell/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2624</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Evasive Entrepreneurs: Innovation and the Administrative State</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/evasive-entrepreneurs-innovation-and-the-administrative-state--53271879</link><description><![CDATA[How should transformative technologies approach the administrative state, and vice versa? In his latest book, “Evasive Entrepreneurs &amp; the Future of Governance,” Adam Thierer of the Mercatus Center reports that tech companies are finding ways to outpace the regulators—and that this is a very good thing. In this episode, the Gray Center’s director Adam White interviews Thierer about his book (and... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/evasive-entrepreneurs-innovation-and-the-administrative-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=778780</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:07:33 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271879/arbitrary_and_capricious_7_9_20.mp3" length="43337005" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>How should transformative technologies approach the administrative state, and vice versa? In his latest book, “Evasive Entrepreneurs &amp;amp; the Future of Governance,” Adam Thierer of the Mercatus Center reports that tech companies are finding ways to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[How should transformative technologies approach the administrative state, and vice versa? In his latest book, “Evasive Entrepreneurs &amp; the Future of Governance,” Adam Thierer of the Mercatus Center reports that tech companies are finding ways to outpace the regulators—and that this is a very good thing. In this episode, the Gray Center’s director Adam White interviews Thierer about his book (and... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/evasive-entrepreneurs-innovation-and-the-administrative-state/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2709</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Dubious Morality of Administrative Law</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-dubious-morality-of-administrative-law--53271854</link><description><![CDATA[On July 6, the Federalist Society invited Adam White to interview Richard Epstein about his new book: “The Dubious Morality of Administrative Law,” for a public teleforum. Adam and Richard had a wide-ranging conversation about the book’s origin and major themes, and then Richard took questions from the audience. Richard previously keynoted two Gray Center conferences. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-dubious-morality-of-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=777491</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 22:06:29 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271854/arbitrary_capricious_dubious_morality_administrative_law.mp3" length="34836553" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On July 6, the Federalist Society invited Adam White to interview Richard Epstein about his new book: “The Dubious Morality of Administrative Law,” for a public teleforum. Adam and Richard had a wide-ranging conversation about the book’s origin and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On July 6, the Federalist Society invited Adam White to interview Richard Epstein about his new book: “The Dubious Morality of Administrative Law,” for a public teleforum. Adam and Richard had a wide-ranging conversation about the book’s origin and major themes, and then Richard took questions from the audience. Richard previously keynoted two Gray Center conferences. <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-dubious-morality-of-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3484</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Tort Liability for Businesses During COVID-19</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/tort-liability-for-businesses-during-covid-19--53271881</link><description><![CDATA[On June 18, 2020, the Gray Center co-sponsored a live webinar, “A Discussion on Tort Liability for Businesses During COVID-19,” in partnership with the Law and Economics Center at Antonin Scalia Law School. Risks of the COVID-19 spread create substantial uncertainty for businesses when deciding whether to open up and conduct business, especially as they try to identify their duties in preventing... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/tort-liability-for-businesses-during-covid-19/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=772644</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:37:21 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271881/tort_liability_for_businesses_during_covid_19.mp3" length="39266659" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On June 18, 2020, the Gray Center co-sponsored a live webinar, “A Discussion on Tort Liability for Businesses During COVID-19,” in partnership with the Law and Economics Center at Antonin Scalia Law School. Risks of the COVID-19 spread create...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On June 18, 2020, the Gray Center co-sponsored a live webinar, “A Discussion on Tort Liability for Businesses During COVID-19,” in partnership with the Law and Economics Center at Antonin Scalia Law School. Risks of the COVID-19 spread create substantial uncertainty for businesses when deciding whether to open up and conduct business, especially as they try to identify their duties in preventing... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/tort-liability-for-businesses-during-covid-19/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3927</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Non-Presidential Administration</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/non-presidential-administration--53271872</link><description><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/non-presidential-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=767546</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 17:42:56 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271872/arbitrary_capricious_non_presidential_administration_1.mp3" length="45246610" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/non-presidential-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4525</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Tools of Administrative Management</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-tools-of-administrative-management--53271898</link><description><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-tools-of-administrative-management/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=764558</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:19:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271898/arbitrary_capricious_tools_of_presidential_management.mp3" length="50516552" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-tools-of-administrative-management/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5052</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Keynote Remarks by Jonathan Rauch</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bureaucracy-and-presidential-administration-keynote-remarks-by-jonathan-rauch--53271906</link><description><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/bureaucracy-and-presidential-administration-keynote-remarks-by-jonathan-rauch/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=760092</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271906/arbitrary_capricious_bureaucracy_presidential_administration_keynote.mp3" length="28486708" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/bureaucracy-and-presidential-administration-keynote-remarks-by-jonathan-rauch/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2849</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Presidential Administration and Bureaucracy</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/presidential-administration-and-bureaucracy--53271930</link><description><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/presidential-administration-and-bureaucracy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=760151</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 18:47:40 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271930/arbitrary_capricious_presidential_administration_and_bureaucracy.mp3" length="41866626" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/presidential-administration-and-bureaucracy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4187</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Bureaucracy, the Presidency, and the Origins of Federal Civil Service</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/bureaucracy-the-presidency-and-the-origins-of-federal-civil-service--53271918</link><description><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/bureaucracy-the-presidency-and-the-origins-of-federal-civil-service/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=757539</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 15:36:26 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271918/arbitrary_capricious_origins_federal_civil_service.mp3" length="46456601" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On February 6, 2020, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Bureaucracy and Presidential Administration: Expertise and Accountability in Constitutional Government.” The conference was inspired in part by James Q. Wilson’s book, Bureaucracy, and Elena Kagan’s article, “Presidential Administration.” The panel sessions centered around new papers the Gray Center helped to incubate on... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/bureaucracy-the-presidency-and-the-origins-of-federal-civil-service/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4646</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>What is the Future of Administrative Law?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-is-the-future-of-administrative-law--53271903</link><description><![CDATA[With the arrival of new Supreme Court justices, and with the emergence of new debates among scholars like Adrian Vermeule and Philip Hamburger over the Constitution and the administrative state, what will happen to Administrative Law? In a recent Harvard Law Review article, Notre Dame’s Professor Jeffrey Pojanowski assesses the scene and suggests a new school of thought: “Neoclassical... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/what-is-the-future-of-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=754384</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 23:33:52 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271903/arbitrary_and_capricious_may_2020.mp3" length="52613213" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>With the arrival of new Supreme Court justices, and with the emergence of new debates among scholars like Adrian Vermeule and Philip Hamburger over the Constitution and the administrative state, what will happen to Administrative Law? In a recent...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[With the arrival of new Supreme Court justices, and with the emergence of new debates among scholars like Adrian Vermeule and Philip Hamburger over the Constitution and the administrative state, what will happen to Administrative Law? In a recent Harvard Law Review article, Notre Dame’s Professor Jeffrey Pojanowski assesses the scene and suggests a new school of thought: “Neoclassical... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/what-is-the-future-of-administrative-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3289</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Disruptive Technology and the Future of “Law”</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/disruptive-technology-and-the-future-of-law--53271928</link><description><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/disruptive-technology-and-the-future-of-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=750248</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:31:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271928/arbitrary_capricious_disruptive_technology.mp3" length="42211703" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/disruptive-technology-and-the-future-of-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4221</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>and ross davies,disruptive technology,jennifer huddleston,joshua blackman,legal singularity,robert weber</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Regulation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-regulation--53271897</link><description><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-regulation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=747728</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:00:28 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271897/artificial_intelligence.mp3" length="47206577" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-regulation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4721</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Technology, Innovation, and Regulation: Keynote Remarks by Kate Lauer</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/technology-innovation-and-regulation-keynote-remarks-by-kate-lauer--53271902</link><description><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/technology-innovation-and-regulation-keynote-remarks-by-kate-lauer/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=745305</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 20:19:10 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271902/arbitrary_capricious_technology_innovation_regulation.mp3" length="20568316" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/technology-innovation-and-regulation-keynote-remarks-by-kate-lauer/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2571</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>“Regulatory Sandboxes” and Other Laboratories of Democracy</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/regulatory-sandboxes-and-other-laboratories-of-democracy--53271893</link><description><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulatory-sandboxes-and-other-laboratories-of-democracy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=739090</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271893/arbitrary_capricious_regulatory_sand_boxes.mp3" length="33698504" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulatory-sandboxes-and-other-laboratories-of-democracy/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4212</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Should Social Media be Regulated for “Neutrality”?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/should-social-media-be-regulated-for-neutrality--53271855</link><description><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/should-social-media-be-regulated-for-neutrality/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=736505</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:30:42 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271855/arbitrary_capricious_social_media_regulation.mp3" length="40018047" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On November 15, 2019, the Gray Center hosted a public policy conference on “Technology, Innovation, and Regulation.” For this conference, scholars wrote and presented papers on the way regulation affects technological innovation, and vice-versa. The Gray Center convened expert panels on topics including whether social media should be regulated for “neutrality,” “regulatory sandboxes” and other... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/should-social-media-be-regulated-for-neutrality/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5002</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judging “Adjudication” with Will Baude</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judging-adjudication-with-will-baude--53271920</link><description><![CDATA[For nearly a century, one of the most contentious issues in the Administrative State has been agency “adjudication” — that is, the power of agencies to adjudicate disputes among private parties, or disputes between private parties and the government. But what if a century’s debate has actually caused us to forget what the issues really are? In the new issue of the Harvard Law Review... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judging-adjudication-with-will-baude/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=733004</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:35:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271920/arbitrary_capricious_template.mp3" length="33965593" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>For nearly a century, one of the most contentious issues in the Administrative State has been agency “adjudication” — that is, the power of agencies to adjudicate disputes among private parties, or disputes between private parties and the government....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[For nearly a century, one of the most contentious issues in the Administrative State has been agency “adjudication” — that is, the power of agencies to adjudicate disputes among private parties, or disputes between private parties and the government. But what if a century’s debate has actually caused us to forget what the issues really are? In the new issue of the Harvard Law Review... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judging-adjudication-with-will-baude/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>2123</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Judicial Review and Immigration Law</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/judicial-review-and-immigration-law--53271886</link><description><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judicial-review-and-immigration-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=732478</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271886/arbitrary_capricious_judicial_review_and_immigration_law.mp3" length="34340698" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/judicial-review-and-immigration-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4293</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Costs of Our Immigration System: Who Does the Burden Fall On?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/costs-of-our-immigration-system-who-does-the-burden-fall-on--53271926</link><description><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/costs-of-our-immigration-system-who-does-the-burden-fall-on/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=730853</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:45:21 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271926/arbitrary_capricioius_costs_4_who_does_the_burden_fall_on.mp3" length="35772627" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/costs-of-our-immigration-system-who-does-the-burden-fall-on/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4472</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Administration of Immigration: Keynote Remarks by James McHenry</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-administration-of-immigration-keynote-remarks-by-james-mchenry--53271923</link><description><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-immigration-keynote-remarks-by-james-mchenry/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=728312</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 23:45:58 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271923/arbitrary_capricious_the_administration_of_immigration_keynote_remarks_by_james_mchenry.mp3" length="15719989" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-immigration-keynote-remarks-by-james-mchenry/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>1965</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Discussing Delegations</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/discussing-delegations--53271908</link><description><![CDATA[Does the Constitution set limits on the powers that Congress authorizes agencies to exercise? Last year, in Gundy v. United States, Justice Gorsuch issued a dissenting opinion calling for a reinvigorated “nondelegation doctrine.” He was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas. Gorsuch’s dissent, along with Justice Alito’s separate opinion, and a subsequent opinion from Justice Kavanaugh... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/discussing-delegations/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=726113</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271908/arbitrary_capricious_interview_1_bagley.mp3" length="27529217" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Does the Constitution set limits on the powers that Congress authorizes agencies to exercise? Last year, in Gundy v. United States, Justice Gorsuch issued a dissenting opinion calling for a reinvigorated “nondelegation doctrine.” He was joined by...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Does the Constitution set limits on the powers that Congress authorizes agencies to exercise? Last year, in Gundy v. United States, Justice Gorsuch issued a dissenting opinion calling for a reinvigorated “nondelegation doctrine.” He was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas. Gorsuch’s dissent, along with Justice Alito’s separate opinion, and a subsequent opinion from Justice Kavanaugh... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/discussing-delegations/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3441</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Is Immigration Law Special? National Security, Special Courts, and “For This Ride Only” Law</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/is-immigration-law-special-national-security-special-courts-and-for-this-ride-only-law--53271904</link><description><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/is-immigration-law-special-national-security-special-courts-and-for-this-ride-only-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=724507</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:12:07 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271904/arbitrary_capricious_2_is_immigration_law_special_1.mp3" length="35522687" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/is-immigration-law-special-national-security-special-courts-and-for-this-ride-only-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4440</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Moral Underpinnings of Immigration Law</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-moral-underpinnings-of-immigration-law--53271917</link><description><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-moral-underpinnings-of-immigration-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=722672</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:58:39 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271917/arbitrary_capricious_moral_underpinnings_immigration_law.mp3" length="36246801" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 25, 2019, the Gray Center hosted “The Administration of Immigration.” For this conference, the Gray Center invited scholars to write papers exploring ways to improve our nation’s immigration system, and discuss them alongside other experts in panel sessions addressing such topics as whether immigration law is special, the costs and benefits of immigration, judicial review of the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-moral-underpinnings-of-immigration-law/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4531</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The IRS, Congress, and the President’s Tax Returns</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-irs-congress-and-the-president-s-tax-returns--53271900</link><description><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-irs-congress-and-the-presidents-tax-returns/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=720347</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 22:45:03 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271900/arbitrary_capricious_congress_irs_president_tax_returns_1.mp3" length="37633799" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-irs-congress-and-the-presidents-tax-returns/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4704</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Democracy of Administration</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-democracy-of-administration--53271916</link><description><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-democracy-of-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=717465</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:01:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271916/arbitrary_capricious_democracy_of_administration.mp3" length="32529681" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-democracy-of-administration/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4066</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Administration of the Census</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-administration-of-the-census--53271914</link><description><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-the-census/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=715414</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 19:38:14 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271914/arbitrary_capricious_administration_of_census.mp3" length="29003568" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-the-census/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3625</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Administration of Federal Campaign Finance Laws</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-administration-of-federal-campaign-finance-laws--53271929</link><description><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-federal-campaign-finance-laws/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=713647</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271929/arbitrary_capricious_federal_campaign_finance_laws.mp3" length="43545832" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-federal-campaign-finance-laws/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5443</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>administrative law,campaign finance law,electoral maps,george mason law review</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Administration of Elections</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-administration-of-elections--53271905</link><description><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-elections/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=711687</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 20:21:52 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271905/arbitrary_capricious_the_administration_of_elections.mp3" length="34061711" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-elections/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4258</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>administration of democracy,andrew kloster,bush v. gore,elections,equal protection,george mason law review,jason torchinsky,michael t. morley,richard h. pildes,right to vote</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>The Administration of Democracy: Campaign Finance Regulation Today</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-administration-of-democracy-campaign-finance-regulation-today--53271849</link><description><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-democracy-campaign-finance-regulation-today/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=706925</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271849/arbitrary_capricious_the_administration_of_democracy_campaign_finance_regulation_today.mp3" length="24165064" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 4, 2019, the Gray Center co-hosted “The Administration of Democracy⏤The George Mason Law Review’s Second Annual Symposium on Administrative Law.” For the second annual symposium, scholars wrote papers on such fundamental questions as: Is nonpartisan campaign-finance regulation possible? Who should draw electoral maps—and how? How can we best protect voting rights? How should the census... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/the-administration-of-democracy-campaign-finance-regulation-today/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>3021</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>administrative state,barack obama,campaign finance,donald trump,don mcgahn,rober bauer,white house counsel</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Why Does Congress Delegate Power?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/why-does-congress-delegate-power--53271890</link><description><![CDATA[On October 8, 2019, the Gray Center lost a great friend and mentor when Michael Uhlmann passed away at the age of 79. Professor Uhlmann served most recently as a Professor of Government at the Claremont Graduate University and Claremont McKenna College; previously he served in the federal government’s executive and legislative branches, taught at George Mason University... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/why-does-congress-delegate-power/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=704678</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 19:55:43 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271890/arbitrary_capricious_why_does_congress_delegate_power.mp3" length="35669182" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On October 8, 2019, the Gray Center lost a great friend and mentor when Michael Uhlmann passed away at the age of 79. Professor Uhlmann served most recently as a Professor of Government at the Claremont Graduate University and Claremont McKenna...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On October 8, 2019, the Gray Center lost a great friend and mentor when Michael Uhlmann passed away at the age of 79. Professor Uhlmann served most recently as a Professor of Government at the Claremont Graduate University and Claremont McKenna College; previously he served in the federal government’s executive and legislative branches, taught at George Mason University... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/why-does-congress-delegate-power/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4459</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Improving Agency Cost-Benefit Analysis</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/improving-agency-cost-benefit-analysis--53271880</link><description><![CDATA[On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or “OIRA.” All of the papers are available on the Gray Center’s web site. And the conference was keynoted by the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/improving-agency-cost-benefit-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=699809</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271880/arbitrary_capricious_improving_agency_cost_benefit_analysis.mp3" length="33119004" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or “OIRA.” All of the papers are available on the Gray Center’s web site. And the conference was keynoted by the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/improving-agency-cost-benefit-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4140</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Regulatory Budgets &amp; Executive Order 13771</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/regulatory-budgets-executive-order-13771--53271925</link><description><![CDATA[On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or “OIRA.” All of the papers are available on the Gray Center’s web site. And the conference was keynoted by the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulatory-budgets-executive-order-13771/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=698163</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271925/arbitrary_capricious_regulatory_budgets_executive_order_13771.mp3" length="38139739" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or “OIRA.” All of the papers are available on the Gray Center’s web site. And the conference was keynoted by the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/regulatory-budgets-executive-order-13771/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4767</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Court</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/cost-benefit-analysis-in-court--53271909</link><description><![CDATA[On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or “OIRA.” All of the papers are available on the Gray Center’s web site. And the conference was keynoted by the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/cost-benefit-analysis-in-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=698641</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271909/arbitrary_capricious_cost_benefit_analysis_in_court.mp3" length="35549436" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or “OIRA.” All of the papers are available on the Gray Center’s web site. And the conference was keynoted by the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/cost-benefit-analysis-in-court/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>4444</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>What Role Should OIRA Play?</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/what-role-should-oira-play--53271915</link><description><![CDATA[On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or “OIRA.” All of the papers are available on the Gray Center’s web site. And the conference was keynoted by the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/what-role-should-oira-play/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=698142</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:33:47 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271915/arbitrary_capricious_what_role_should_oira_play.mp3" length="40257956" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[On September 13, the Gray Center hosted a conference on The Future of White House Regulatory Oversight and Cost-Benefit Analysis. At the conference, a number of scholars presented new research on cost-benefit analysis and the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, or “OIRA.” All of the papers are available on the Gray Center’s web site. And the conference was keynoted by the... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/what-role-should-oira-play/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>5032</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Introducing Arbitrary &amp; Capricious</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/episode/introducing-arbitrary-capricious--53271843</link><description><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State, at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, supports research and debate on the modern administrative state, and the constitutional issues surrounding it. In this podcast, we’ll discuss some of the questions being debated around modern administration — some new questions, some timeless ones. And you can also get the audio from... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/introducing-arbitrary-capricious/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://ricochet.com/?post_type=podcasts&amp;#038;p=695566</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 23:10:18 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://media.blubrry.com/3956226/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/53271843/arbitrary_capricious_preview.mp3" length="3780149" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State, at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, supports research and debate on the modern administrative state, and the constitutional issues surrounding it. In this podcast, we’ll...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State, at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, supports research and debate on the modern administrative state, and the constitutional issues surrounding it. In this podcast, we’ll discuss some of the questions being debated around modern administration — some new questions, some timeless ones. And you can also get the audio from... <a href="https://ricochet.com/podcast/gray-matters/introducing-arbitrary-capricious/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Source</a>]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>473</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/d957e381ba9ec7c0cfe1c792e0bb1460.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>
