<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Boredom And Philosophy</title><link>https://mmaltcullen.com/</link><description><![CDATA[This is a podcast for students of philosophy as well as interested people. Motivated by the social distancing policies during COVID-19, I decided to create a podcast to support school philosophy curriculum by recording readings of key texts and analysing them, taking inspiration from standard introductory courses for philosophy, as well as the National 5 and Higher Philosophy curricula.<br /><br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></description><atom:link href="https://www.spreaker.com/show/4284968/episodes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><language>en</language><category>Society &amp; Culture</category><copyright>Copyright Michael Malt-Cullen</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 03:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:name><itunes:email>feeds@spreaker.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:subtitle>This is a podcast for students of philosophy as well as interested people. Motivated by the social distancing policies during COVID-19, I decided to create a podcast to support school philosophy curriculum by recording readings of key texts and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This is a podcast for students of philosophy as well as interested people. Motivated by the social distancing policies during COVID-19, I decided to create a podcast to support school philosophy curriculum by recording readings of key texts and analysing them, taking inspiration from standard introductory courses for philosophy, as well as the National 5 and Higher Philosophy curricula.<br /><br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><item><title>Episode 17 - The Sceptical Challenge and Rationalism</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-17-the-sceptical-challenge-and-r</link><description><![CDATA[In this episode, we cover the sceptical challenge to knowledge and rationalism as a possible answer to it. If you have any questions, please feel free contact me via my social media below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />BBC (2004). In Our Time, Empiricism. [online] BBC. Available at: <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p004y28g" rel="noopener">https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p004y28g</a> [Accessed 27 Jan. 2021].<br /><br />Crash Course (2016). Locke, Berkeley, & Empiricism: Crash Course Philosophy #6. YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C-s4JrymKM." rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C-s4JrymKM.</a><br /><br />Klein, P. (2015). Skepticism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/</a>.<br /><br />Markie, P. (2017). Rationalism vs. Empiricism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/43636081</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:02:08 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/43636081/imported_3d0da1af_0743_420d_bff7_18da0ec68c1e.mp3" length="12447660" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we cover the sceptical challenge to knowledge and rationalism as a possible answer to it. If you have any questions, please feel free contact me via my social media below.

Website: www.mmaltcullen.com
Twitter: @MaltCullen...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we cover the sceptical challenge to knowledge and rationalism as a possible answer to it. If you have any questions, please feel free contact me via my social media below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />BBC (2004). In Our Time, Empiricism. [online] BBC. Available at: <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p004y28g" rel="noopener">https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p004y28g</a> [Accessed 27 Jan. 2021].<br /><br />Crash Course (2016). Locke, Berkeley, & Empiricism: Crash Course Philosophy #6. YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C-s4JrymKM." rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C-s4JrymKM.</a><br /><br />Klein, P. (2015). Skepticism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/</a>.<br /><br />Markie, P. (2017). Rationalism vs. Empiricism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>778</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 16 - Critiques of Utilitarianism Part 2</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/e-15</link><description><![CDATA[In this weeks's episode, we wrap up our critiques of utilitarianism, and discuss how other forms of utilitarianism might help us address some of these critiques.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Cohon, R. (2004). Hume’s Moral Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/</a>.<br /><br />Driver, J. (2009). The History of Utilitarianism. [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/</a>.<br /><br />Hooker, B. (2015). Rule Consequentialism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/</a>.<br /><br />Hurka, T. (2015). Moore’s Moral Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore-moral/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore-moral/</a> [Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].<br /><br />McIntyre, A. (2018). Doctrine of Double Effect (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/</a>.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2015). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<br /><br />Nozick, R. (2017). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<br /><br />Tong, R. and Williams, N. (2009). Feminist Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/43107536</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:00:34 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/43107536/e_15.mp3" length="13684400" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this weeks's episode, we wrap up our critiques of utilitarianism, and discuss how other forms of utilitarianism might help us address some of these critiques.

Website: www.mmaltcullen.com
Twitter: @MaltCullen

References:

Cohon, R. (2004). Hume’s...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this weeks's episode, we wrap up our critiques of utilitarianism, and discuss how other forms of utilitarianism might help us address some of these critiques.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Cohon, R. (2004). Hume’s Moral Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/</a>.<br /><br />Driver, J. (2009). The History of Utilitarianism. [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/</a>.<br /><br />Hooker, B. (2015). Rule Consequentialism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/</a>.<br /><br />Hurka, T. (2015). Moore’s Moral Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore-moral/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore-moral/</a> [Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].<br /><br />McIntyre, A. (2018). Doctrine of Double Effect (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/</a>.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2015). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<br /><br />Nozick, R. (2017). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<br /><br />Tong, R. and Williams, N. (2009). Feminist Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>856</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 15 - Fallacies In Arguments</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-15-fallacies-in-arguments</link><description><![CDATA[This week we cover six argument fallacies, four informal and two formal and apply them using examples. If you have any questions feel free to get in touch  via my social media below or via the contact form on my website!<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Baggini, J. (2005). The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten: And 99 other thought experiments. London, UK: Granta Books.<br /><br />Dare, T. (n.d.). Common fallacies Explained. [online] FutureLearn. Available at: <a href="https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/logical-and-critical-thinking/0/steps/9131" rel="noopener">https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/logical-and-critical-thinking/0/steps/9131</a> [Accessed 14 Dec. 2020].<br /><br />Hansen, H. (2015). Fallacies (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/42723952</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:01:32 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/42723952/imported_641a5e8d_262a_464f_8551_429ecc34e61d.mp3" length="10117120" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This week we cover six argument fallacies, four informal and two formal and apply them using examples. If you have any questions feel free to get in touch  via my social media below or via the contact form on my website!

Website: www.mmaltcullen.com...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This week we cover six argument fallacies, four informal and two formal and apply them using examples. If you have any questions feel free to get in touch  via my social media below or via the contact form on my website!<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Baggini, J. (2005). The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten: And 99 other thought experiments. London, UK: Granta Books.<br /><br />Dare, T. (n.d.). Common fallacies Explained. [online] FutureLearn. Available at: <a href="https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/logical-and-critical-thinking/0/steps/9131" rel="noopener">https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/logical-and-critical-thinking/0/steps/9131</a> [Accessed 14 Dec. 2020].<br /><br />Hansen, H. (2015). Fallacies (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies/</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>633</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 14 - WPD ‘On Sense And Reference’ by Gottlob Frege Part 3</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/e-14-wpd-on-sense-and-reference-part-3</link><description><![CDATA[In this week's episode, we cover the last parts of Frege's 'On Sense and Reference' extending his theory to larger linguistic items like sub-clauses and whole sentences. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media below!<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Frege, G. (1948). On Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), pp.209–230.<br /><br />Jacquette, D. (2019). Frege: A Philosophical Biography. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2009). A System Of Logic: Ratiocinative And Inductive. [online] Project Gutenberg. Available at: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf" rel="noopener">https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf</a>.<br /><br />Russell, B. (2005). On Denoting. Mind, 114(456), pp.873–887.<br /><br />Taylor, K. (1998). Truth & Meaning: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.<br /><br />Zalta, E.N. (2016). Gottlob Frege (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/42158083</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:20:52 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/42158083/imported_6dfc2eb3_3ca4_4dc3_b0a2_1a1bbaad67a3.mp3" length="6726217" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode, we cover the last parts of Frege's 'On Sense and Reference' extending his theory to larger linguistic items like sub-clauses and whole sentences. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media below!...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this week's episode, we cover the last parts of Frege's 'On Sense and Reference' extending his theory to larger linguistic items like sub-clauses and whole sentences. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media below!<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Frege, G. (1948). On Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), pp.209–230.<br /><br />Jacquette, D. (2019). Frege: A Philosophical Biography. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2009). A System Of Logic: Ratiocinative And Inductive. [online] Project Gutenberg. Available at: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf" rel="noopener">https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf</a>.<br /><br />Russell, B. (2005). On Denoting. Mind, 114(456), pp.873–887.<br /><br />Taylor, K. (1998). Truth & Meaning: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.<br /><br />Zalta, E.N. (2016). Gottlob Frege (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>421</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 13 - WPD ‘On Sense and Reference’ by Gottlob Frege Part 2</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-13-wpd-on-sense-and-reference-by</link><description><![CDATA[In this episode, we cover Frege's theory of sense and reference, applying it to names and identity statements in order to solve the puzzle presented at the start of the paper.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Frege, G. (1948). On Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), pp.209–230.<br /><br />Jacquette, D. (2019). Frege : a philosophical biography. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, Ny, Usa: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Taylor, K. (1998). Truth & Meaning: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.<br /><br />Zalta, E.N. (2016). Gottlob Frege (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/42105725</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:02:22 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/42105725/imported_20ff1fd7_48d8_4b4f_aa20_ca86e2f04526.mp3" length="6567392" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we cover Frege's theory of sense and reference, applying it to names and identity statements in order to solve the puzzle presented at the start of the paper.

Website: www.mmaltcullen.com
Twitter: @MaltCullen

References:

Frege, G....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we cover Frege's theory of sense and reference, applying it to names and identity statements in order to solve the puzzle presented at the start of the paper.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Frege, G. (1948). On Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), pp.209–230.<br /><br />Jacquette, D. (2019). Frege : a philosophical biography. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, Ny, Usa: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Taylor, K. (1998). Truth & Meaning: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.<br /><br />Zalta, E.N. (2016). Gottlob Frege (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>411</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 12 -  WPD 'On Sense And Reference' by Gottlob Frege Part 1</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/e-12-wpd-on-sense-and-reference</link><description><![CDATA[In celebration of World Philosophy Day, we are covering one of my favourite philosophy papers 'On Sense and Reference' by Gottob Frege. We will cover some basic biographical information about Frege, as well as the motivating puzzle for 'On Sense and Reference'.<br /><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br /><br />References:<br /><br />Frege, G. (1948). On Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), pp.209–230.<br /><br />Jacquette, D. (2019). Frege : a philosophical biography. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, Ny, Usa: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2009). A System Of Logic: Ratiocinative And Inductive. [online] Project Gutenberg. Available at: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf" rel="noopener">https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf</a>.<br /><br />Zalta, E.N. (2016). Gottlob Frege (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/</a>.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/42089988</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 11:13:06 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/42089988/imported_4295aac5_9d8b_410d_983a_2acb81ecf854.mp3" length="7468930" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In celebration of World Philosophy Day, we are covering one of my favourite philosophy papers 'On Sense and Reference' by Gottob Frege. We will cover some basic biographical information about Frege, as well as the motivating puzzle for 'On Sense and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In celebration of World Philosophy Day, we are covering one of my favourite philosophy papers 'On Sense and Reference' by Gottob Frege. We will cover some basic biographical information about Frege, as well as the motivating puzzle for 'On Sense and Reference'.<br /><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br /><br />References:<br /><br />Frege, G. (1948). On Sense and Reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), pp.209–230.<br /><br />Jacquette, D. (2019). Frege : a philosophical biography. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, Ny, Usa: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2009). A System Of Logic: Ratiocinative And Inductive. [online] Project Gutenberg. Available at: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf" rel="noopener">https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-pdf.pdf</a>.<br /><br />Zalta, E.N. (2016). Gottlob Frege (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/</a>.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>467</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 11 - Critiques Of Utilitarianism Part 1</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/e-11-critiques-of-utilitarianism-part-1</link><description><![CDATA[In this week's episode, we go over three objections to utilitarianism and the utility calculus. If you have any questions, feel free to get in tough via my social media below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br /><br />References:<br /><br />Driver, J. (2009). The History of Utilitarianism. [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/</a>.<br /><br />Hurka, T. (2015). Moore’s Moral Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore-moral/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore-moral/</a> [Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].<br /><br />McIntyre, A. (2018). Doctrine of Double Effect (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/</a>.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2015). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<br /><br />Nozick, R. (2017). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<br /><br />Schumacher, Benjamin, The Great Courses, The Science of Information: From Language to Black Holes, Narrated by Benjamin Schumacher, The Great Courses, 2018, Audiobook.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/41698590</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:58:12 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/41698590/imported_4fa98863_0d18_4509_84a9_3327888b1bdb.mp3" length="7372800" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode, we go over three objections to utilitarianism and the utility calculus. If you have any questions, feel free to get in tough via my social media below.

Website: www.mmaltcullen.com
Twitter: @MaltCullen


References:

Driver,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this week's episode, we go over three objections to utilitarianism and the utility calculus. If you have any questions, feel free to get in tough via my social media below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br /><br /><br />References:<br /><br />Driver, J. (2009). The History of Utilitarianism. [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/</a>.<br /><br />Hurka, T. (2015). Moore’s Moral Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore-moral/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore-moral/</a> [Accessed 5 Dec. 2019].<br /><br />McIntyre, A. (2018). Doctrine of Double Effect (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/double-effect/</a>.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2015). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.<br /><br />Nozick, R. (2017). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.<br /><br />Schumacher, Benjamin, The Great Courses, The Science of Information: From Language to Black Holes, Narrated by Benjamin Schumacher, The Great Courses, 2018, Audiobook.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>461</itunes:duration><itunes:keywords>philosophy,utilitarianism</itunes:keywords><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 10 - Premises and Conclusions</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-10-premises-and-conclusions</link><description><![CDATA[In this week's episode, we cover the basics of argument structure, going through what a premise and conclusion is, with some reference to general argument structures. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Malt-Cullen, M. (2020). __Can philosophy be popular?__ [online] Michael Malt-Cullen. Available at: <a href="https://mmaltcullen.com/can-philosophy-be-popular/" rel="noopener">https://mmaltcullen.com/can-philosophy-be-popular/</a> [Accessed 2 Jul. 2020].‌]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/35650395</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:48:36 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/35650395/imported_b0254fff_8f55_4944_961c_a318c3efd193.mp3" length="6779297" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode, we cover the basics of argument structure, going through what a premise and conclusion is, with some reference to general argument structures. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media below....</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this week's episode, we cover the basics of argument structure, going through what a premise and conclusion is, with some reference to general argument structures. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Malt-Cullen, M. (2020). __Can philosophy be popular?__ [online] Michael Malt-Cullen. Available at: <a href="https://mmaltcullen.com/can-philosophy-be-popular/" rel="noopener">https://mmaltcullen.com/can-philosophy-be-popular/</a> [Accessed 2 Jul. 2020].‌]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>424</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 9 - Bentham and Mill</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-9-bentham-and-mill</link><description><![CDATA[In this episode, we cover Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's systems of utilitarianism, comparing some of their aspects and their different understandings of pleasure. If you have any question, please feel free to contact me via my social media below!<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Driver, J. (2009). The History of Utilitarianism. [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/</a>.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2015). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/31686201</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 15:27:50 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/31686201/draft_1592493058662736_audio.mp3" length="9197191" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we cover Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's systems of utilitarianism, comparing some of their aspects and their different understandings of pleasure. If you have any question, please feel free to contact me via my social media...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we cover Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's systems of utilitarianism, comparing some of their aspects and their different understandings of pleasure. If you have any question, please feel free to contact me via my social media below!<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Driver, J. (2009). The History of Utilitarianism. [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/</a>.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2015). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>575</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 8 - Utilitarianism</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-8-utilitarianism</link><description><![CDATA[In this episode, we will be going through an introduction to utilitarianism. We go through a general overview to prepare us for an explanation of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's systems of utilitarianism. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br /><br />References: <br />Driver, J. (2009). The History of Utilitarianism. [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/</a>.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2015). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/29277005</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 11:44:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/29277005/draft_159127043310805_audio.mp3" length="5688006" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we will be going through an introduction to utilitarianism. We go through a general overview to prepare us for an explanation of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's systems of utilitarianism. If you have any questions, feel free to...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we will be going through an introduction to utilitarianism. We go through a general overview to prepare us for an explanation of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill's systems of utilitarianism. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br /><br />References: <br />Driver, J. (2009). The History of Utilitarianism. [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/</a>.<br /><br />Mill, J.S. (2015). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>356</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 7 - Analysis of Descartes' Second Meditation (Part 2)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-7-analysis-of-descartes-second-m</link><description><![CDATA[In this episode we will be finishing our analysis Descartes' second meditation. There are a lot of themes to keep track of in this episode, including separating epistemic and metaphysical arguments, as well as tracking where doubt is still present and where it is not. While it is a challenging episode, it highlights the sort of conceptual organising that is a requirement for philosophical analysis. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media which will be below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Anadale, C. (2019). Descartes Meditation 2 Walkthrough. YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqNGa7gQxhk" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqNGa7gQxhk</a> [Accessed 24 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on First Philosophy. 6th ed. Translated by J. Cottingham. UK: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Gallois, A. (2016). Identity Over Time (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/</a> [Accessed 14 Oct. 2019].<br /><br />Hyde, D. and Raffman, D. (2018). Sorites Paradox (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/</a>.<br /><br />The Partially Examined Life (2009). Episode 2: Descartes’s Meditations: What Can We Know?. [online] The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast. Available at: <a href="https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/" rel="noopener">https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/</a> [Accessed 6 Apr. 2020].]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/27953093</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 10:16:00 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/27953093/draft_1589559173771206_audio.mp3" length="11931480" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this episode we will be finishing our analysis Descartes' second meditation. There are a lot of themes to keep track of in this episode, including separating epistemic and metaphysical arguments, as well as tracking where doubt is still present and...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode we will be finishing our analysis Descartes' second meditation. There are a lot of themes to keep track of in this episode, including separating epistemic and metaphysical arguments, as well as tracking where doubt is still present and where it is not. While it is a challenging episode, it highlights the sort of conceptual organising that is a requirement for philosophical analysis. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media which will be below.<br /><br />Website: <a href="http://www.mmaltcullen.com" rel="noopener">www.mmaltcullen.com</a><br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Anadale, C. (2019). Descartes Meditation 2 Walkthrough. YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqNGa7gQxhk" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqNGa7gQxhk</a> [Accessed 24 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on First Philosophy. 6th ed. Translated by J. Cottingham. UK: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Gallois, A. (2016). Identity Over Time (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/</a> [Accessed 14 Oct. 2019].<br /><br />Hyde, D. and Raffman, D. (2018). Sorites Paradox (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). [online] Stanford.edu. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/</a>.<br /><br />The Partially Examined Life (2009). Episode 2: Descartes’s Meditations: What Can We Know?. [online] The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast. Available at: <a href="https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/" rel="noopener">https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/</a> [Accessed 6 Apr. 2020].]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>746</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 6 - Theoretical Knowledge and Practical Knowledge</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-6-theoretical-knowledge-and-prac</link><description><![CDATA[In this week's episode, we cover the distinction between practical and theoretical knowledge and talk about Leonardo da Vinci and Alan Turing! If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media (below). <br /><br />References:<br /><br />Carneades.org (2019). The Three Kinds of Knowledge (Knowledge That, Knowledge Of, and Knowledge How). YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Fantl, J. (2017). Knowledge How. Fall 2017 ed. [online] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Hetherington, S. (2011). Knowledge | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] Utm.edu. Available at: <a href="https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/" rel="noopener">https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/</a>.<br /><br />Hodges, A. (2012). Alan Turing: The Enigma. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.<br /><br />Isaacson, W. (2018). Leonardo Da Vinci. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.<br /><br />Social media:<br /><br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/26861844</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 08:07:25 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/26861844/draft_1588837947338633_audio.mp3" length="6057900" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode, we cover the distinction between practical and theoretical knowledge and talk about Leonardo da Vinci and Alan Turing! If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media (below). 

References:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this week's episode, we cover the distinction between practical and theoretical knowledge and talk about Leonardo da Vinci and Alan Turing! If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media (below). <br /><br />References:<br /><br />Carneades.org (2019). The Three Kinds of Knowledge (Knowledge That, Knowledge Of, and Knowledge How). YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Fantl, J. (2017). Knowledge How. Fall 2017 ed. [online] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Hetherington, S. (2011). Knowledge | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] Utm.edu. Available at: <a href="https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/" rel="noopener">https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/</a>.<br /><br />Hodges, A. (2012). Alan Turing: The Enigma. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.<br /><br />Isaacson, W. (2018). Leonardo Da Vinci. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.<br /><br />Social media:<br /><br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>379</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 5 - Analysis Of Descartes' Second Meditation (Part 1)</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-5-analysis-of-descartes-second-m</link><description><![CDATA[- Caveat for the interpretation of Descartes argument: Perhaps a bad idea on my part, but the use of the word 'something' in every step of the argument refers to the same object all the way through, meaning that 'If I know that X is the same as me, and I know that X exists, then I know that I exist'.<br /><br />In this week's episode, I provide an analysis of the first half of Descartes' second meditation in Meditations on First Philosophy. There are some really interesting discussions the importance of keeping epistemological and metaphysical arguments separate as well as finally finding out what we can know! If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media (below). <br /><br />References:<br /><br />Anadale, C. (2019). Descartes Meditation 2 Walkthrough. YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqNGa7gQxhk" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqNGa7gQxhk</a> [Accessed 24 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on First Philosophy. 6th ed. Translated by J. Cottingham. UK: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />The Partially Examined Life (2009). Episode 2: Descartes’s Meditations: What Can We Know? [online] The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast. Available at: <a href="https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/" rel="noopener">https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/</a> [Accessed 6 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Social Media:<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/25999416</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:49:24 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/25999416/draft_1587717158988232_audio.mp3" length="8693551" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>- Caveat for the interpretation of Descartes argument: Perhaps a bad idea on my part, but the use of the word 'something' in every step of the argument refers to the same object all the way through, meaning that 'If I know that X is the same as me,...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[- Caveat for the interpretation of Descartes argument: Perhaps a bad idea on my part, but the use of the word 'something' in every step of the argument refers to the same object all the way through, meaning that 'If I know that X is the same as me, and I know that X exists, then I know that I exist'.<br /><br />In this week's episode, I provide an analysis of the first half of Descartes' second meditation in Meditations on First Philosophy. There are some really interesting discussions the importance of keeping epistemological and metaphysical arguments separate as well as finally finding out what we can know! If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media (below). <br /><br />References:<br /><br />Anadale, C. (2019). Descartes Meditation 2 Walkthrough. YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqNGa7gQxhk" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqNGa7gQxhk</a> [Accessed 24 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on First Philosophy. 6th ed. Translated by J. Cottingham. UK: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />The Partially Examined Life (2009). Episode 2: Descartes’s Meditations: What Can We Know? [online] The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast. Available at: <a href="https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/" rel="noopener">https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/</a> [Accessed 6 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Social Media:<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>544</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 4 - Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-4-knowledge-by-acquaintance-and-</link><description><![CDATA[In this week's episode I go through Russell's distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Hopefully going through this distinction will help ground your understanding of the knowledge how and knowledge that distinction from Episode 2. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media (below).<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Carneades.org (2019). The Three Kinds of Knowledge (Knowledge That, Knowledge Of, and Knowledge How). YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Fantl, J. (2017). Knowledge How. Fall 2017 ed. [online] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Hetherington, S. (2011). Knowledge | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] Utm.edu. Available at: <a href="https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/" rel="noopener">https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/</a>.<br /><br />Russell, B. (2009). Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. In: R.E. Egner and L.E. Denonn, eds., The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. London, UK: Routledge, pp.191–198.<br /><br />Russell, B. (1912). On the Relations of Universals and Particulars. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 12, pp.1–24.<br /><br />Social Media:<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/25642082</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:12:41 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/25642082/draft_1587117441522022_audio.mp3" length="5905345" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In this week's episode I go through Russell's distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Hopefully going through this distinction will help ground your understanding of the knowledge how and knowledge that distinction...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this week's episode I go through Russell's distinction between knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Hopefully going through this distinction will help ground your understanding of the knowledge how and knowledge that distinction from Episode 2. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch via my social media (below).<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Carneades.org (2019). The Three Kinds of Knowledge (Knowledge That, Knowledge Of, and Knowledge How). YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Fantl, J. (2017). Knowledge How. Fall 2017 ed. [online] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Hetherington, S. (2011). Knowledge | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] Utm.edu. Available at: <a href="https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/" rel="noopener">https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/</a>.<br /><br />Russell, B. (2009). Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. In: R.E. Egner and L.E. Denonn, eds., The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. London, UK: Routledge, pp.191–198.<br /><br />Russell, B. (1912). On the Relations of Universals and Particulars. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 12, pp.1–24.<br /><br />Social Media:<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>370</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 3 - Analysis Of Descartes' First Meditation</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-3-analysis-of-descartes-first-me</link><description><![CDATA[This weeks episode is an analysis of Descartes' First Meditation, a reading of which you can find on Episode 1 of the podcast. We will be going through the meditation paragraph by paragraph, analysing Descartes method for establishing radical doubt (as it is termed in philosophical literature) for all of his beliefs.<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Anadale, C. (2018). Descartes Meditation 1 Walkthrough. YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsvptfRkWog" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsvptfRkWog</a> [Accessed 9 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on First Philosophy. 6th ed. Translated by J. Cottingham. UK: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Plato (1953). The Dialogues of Plato. Translated by B. Jowett. Oxford, UK: Calerndon Press.<br /><br />The Partially Examined Life (2009). Episode 2: Descartes’s Meditations: What Can We Know? [online] The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast. Available at: <a href="https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/" rel="noopener">https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/</a> [Accessed 6 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Social Media:<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/25161729</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/25161729/draft_1586453800443321_audio.mp3" length="9600104" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This weeks episode is an analysis of Descartes' First Meditation, a reading of which you can find on Episode 1 of the podcast. We will be going through the meditation paragraph by paragraph, analysing Descartes method for establishing radical doubt...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This weeks episode is an analysis of Descartes' First Meditation, a reading of which you can find on Episode 1 of the podcast. We will be going through the meditation paragraph by paragraph, analysing Descartes method for establishing radical doubt (as it is termed in philosophical literature) for all of his beliefs.<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Anadale, C. (2018). Descartes Meditation 1 Walkthrough. YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsvptfRkWog" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsvptfRkWog</a> [Accessed 9 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on First Philosophy. 6th ed. Translated by J. Cottingham. UK: Cambridge University Press.<br /><br />Plato (1953). The Dialogues of Plato. Translated by B. Jowett. Oxford, UK: Calerndon Press.<br /><br />The Partially Examined Life (2009). Episode 2: Descartes’s Meditations: What Can We Know? [online] The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast. Available at: <a href="https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/" rel="noopener">https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2009/05/13/episode-2-descartess-meditations-what-can-we-know/</a> [Accessed 6 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Social Media:<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>601</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 2 - Knowledge How And Knowledge That</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-2-knowledge-how-and-knowpedge-th</link><description><![CDATA[This week's episode is about epistemology, starting with the distinction between knowledge how and knowledge that. I'll be going through this distinction with reference to the intellectualism/anti-intellectualism debate largely sparked by Gilbert Ryle.<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Carneades.org (2019). The Three Kinds of Knowledge (Knowledge That, Knowledge Of, and Knowledge How). YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Fantl, J. (2017). Knowledge How. Fall 2017 ed. [online] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Hetherington, S. (2011). Knowledge | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] Utm.edu. Available at: <a href="https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/" rel="noopener">https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/</a>.<br /><br />Russell, B. (2009). Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. In: R.E. Egner and L.E. Denonn, eds., The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. London, UK: Routledge, pp.191–198.<br /><br />Social Media:<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/24735682</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 06:56:19 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/24735682/draft_158580835282227_audio.mp3" length="11674017" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This week's episode is about epistemology, starting with the distinction between knowledge how and knowledge that. I'll be going through this distinction with reference to the intellectualism/anti-intellectualism debate largely sparked by Gilbert...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[This week's episode is about epistemology, starting with the distinction between knowledge how and knowledge that. I'll be going through this distinction with reference to the intellectualism/anti-intellectualism debate largely sparked by Gilbert Ryle.<br /><br />References:<br /><br />Carneades.org (2019). The Three Kinds of Knowledge (Knowledge That, Knowledge Of, and Knowledge How). YouTube. Available at: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o" rel="noopener">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59RMe5ccT7o</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Fantl, J. (2017). Knowledge How. Fall 2017 ed. [online] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: <a href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/" rel="noopener">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-how/</a> [Accessed 1 Apr. 2020].<br /><br />Hetherington, S. (2011). Knowledge | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [online] Utm.edu. Available at: <a href="https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/" rel="noopener">https://www.iep.utm.edu/knowledg/</a>.<br /><br />Russell, B. (2009). Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. In: R.E. Egner and L.E. Denonn, eds., The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. London, UK: Routledge, pp.191–198.<br /><br />Social Media:<br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>730</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 1 - Descartes' First Meditation In 'Meditations On First Philosophy'</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-1-descartes-first-meditation-in-</link><description><![CDATA[Hi guys. Welcome to the Boredom and Philosophy podcast. This episode is a reading of Descartes' First Meditation in 'Meditations on First Philosophy'. I hope you all enjoy and please do get in touch if you have any questions!<br /><br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen <br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/24371544</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:18:53 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/24371544/draft_158520857291255_audio.mp3" length="12481097" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Hi guys. Welcome to the Boredom and Philosophy podcast. This episode is a reading of Descartes' First Meditation in 'Meditations on First Philosophy'. I hope you all enjoy and please do get in touch if you have any questions!

Instagram:...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Hi guys. Welcome to the Boredom and Philosophy podcast. This episode is a reading of Descartes' First Meditation in 'Meditations on First Philosophy'. I hope you all enjoy and please do get in touch if you have any questions!<br /><br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen <br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>781</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/097a56ea9365a3b04ca1302ae8ff3d8e.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Episode 0 - Introductory Rambling</title><link>https://www.spreaker.com/user/12201302/episode-0-introductory-rambling</link><description><![CDATA[Hi guys. Thanks for tuning in to the first episode of my podcast. Hopefully the next episodes will provide some entertainment and useful information. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out on my social media platforms! Enjoy!<br /><br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">https://api.spreaker.com/episode/24303463</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 19:09:16 +0000</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.spreaker.com/download/episode/24303463/draft_1585162975860988_audio.mp3" length="2833763" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:author>Michael Malt-Cullen</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Hi guys. Thanks for tuning in to the first episode of my podcast. Hopefully the next episodes will provide some entertainment and useful information. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out on my social media platforms! Enjoy!...</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Hi guys. Thanks for tuning in to the first episode of my podcast. Hopefully the next episodes will provide some entertainment and useful information. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out on my social media platforms! Enjoy!<br /><br />Instagram: @mikemaltcullen<br />Twitter: @MaltCullen<br />Blog: indamea.blogspot.com]]></itunes:summary><itunes:duration>178</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit><itunes:image href="https://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/images.spreaker.com/cloudinary/s--bBjc_ChG--/w_1000,h_800,c_fit,l_text:Lato_158_bold:Boredom%20And%20Philosophy/images.spreaker.com/default/show-1400x1400-20190801.jpg"/><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>
