https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>enEducationGeorge Malipilohttps://d3wo5wojvuv7l.cloudfront.net/t_rss_itunes_square_1400/images.spreaker.com/original/1a8ce688458b17fd11563960d5fb74e4.jpghttps://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826Fri, 05 Jun 2026 06:12:41 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOGEORGE MALIPILOgeorgemalipilo23@gmail.comThe Podcast offers quick, insightful breakdowns of old and recent Zambian Land mark Judgment with the purpose of  simplifying key legal principles and their impact . 
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>falseserialSupport the podcast!https://www.spreaker.com/episode/christine-mulundika-and-7-others-vs-the-people-1995-supreme-court-of-zambia-judgement--19260216
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/19260216Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:16:47 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOAt the heart of this case was whether certain provisions of the Public Order Act Chapter 104 of the Laws of Zambia went against and therefore contravened Article 19 on protection of freedom of assocation and Article 21 on protection of freedom of...
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>831educational,law,legalpodcastsfalse11fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/godwin-mumba-v-mary-goma-mumba-2009-hp-a54--19284063
The Main issue that the High-Court had to decided was whether or not the Courts Below (Local Court and Subordinate Court of the First Court had Jurisdiction to adjudicate on a divorce as a result of a marriage contracted in accordance with the Marriage Act,Chapter 50 of the Laws of Zambia ?

This Landmark Judgement established that the High-Court of Zambia through the Matrimonial Causes Act No.27 Of 2007 is the only Court in Zambia that has authority to hear divorce matters concerning a marriage that was solemnised in accordance with the Marriage Act;Chapter 50 of the Laws of Zambia.

Further-more , kindly Note I stated Miyanda v The Attorney but the correct case is Miyanda v The High-Court of Zambia (1984) Z.R 62 .


Legsilation referred to in this Podcast : (1) Matrimonial Causes Act No.27 of 2007 .Sections 2;3and4 (1) . (2) Local Court Act Chapter 29 of the Laws of Zambia .Section 8(1) (3) Subordinate Court Act ,Chapter 28 of the Laws of Zambia . Section 20 (d)(ii)(iv)


Music from bensound.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/19284063Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:38:44 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThis was a Divorce Appeal that found it's way onto the High Court Principal Registry list as an appeal from the Subordinate Court of Zambia .The Appellant was not happy with the compensation the Local Court had ordered him to pay his now former wife...
The Main issue that the High-Court had to decided was whether or not the Courts Below (Local Court and Subordinate Court of the First Court had Jurisdiction to adjudicate on a divorce as a result of a marriage contracted in accordance with the Marriage Act,Chapter 50 of the Laws of Zambia ?

This Landmark Judgement established that the High-Court of Zambia through the Matrimonial Causes Act No.27 Of 2007 is the only Court in Zambia that has authority to hear divorce matters concerning a marriage that was solemnised in accordance with the Marriage Act;Chapter 50 of the Laws of Zambia.

Further-more , kindly Note I stated Miyanda v The Attorney but the correct case is Miyanda v The High-Court of Zambia (1984) Z.R 62 .


Legsilation referred to in this Podcast : (1) Matrimonial Causes Act No.27 of 2007 .Sections 2;3and4 (1) . (2) Local Court Act Chapter 29 of the Laws of Zambia .Section 8(1) (3) Subordinate Court Act ,Chapter 28 of the Laws of Zambia . Section 20 (d)(ii)(iv)


Music from bensound.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>813familylaw,law,legalpodcast,marriageact,zambiancasesfalse12fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/zambia-privatisation-agency-v-james-matale-1996-selected-judgement-supreme-court-of-zambia--19489993
The Second issue for determination before the Supreme Court of Zambia was In the event No Termination Period or Notice clause is expressed stated in the Contract of Employment . What will be the accepted or reasonable notice to give the employee about the termination of the employment ?

Music from bensound.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/19489993Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:20:35 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe Issue for determination before the Supreme Court of Zambia was whether Z.P.A Payment in lieu of Notice was unlawful and unjustified . The Second issue for determination before the Supreme Court of Zambia was In the event No Termination Period or...
The Second issue for determination before the Supreme Court of Zambia was In the event No Termination Period or Notice clause is expressed stated in the Contract of Employment . What will be the accepted or reasonable notice to give the employee about the termination of the employment ?

Music from bensound.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>901education,employment-laws,humanresource,legalpodcastfalse13fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/siwale-and-others-v-siwale-s-c-z-judgement-no-24-of-1999--20217131
The Late Donaldo Siwale had left 400 Hectreas of Customary Land which the Respondent then placed on Title in his name only without his elder brothers have a clue.

Note : I meant to say the Supreme Court of Zambia granted judgement for the Appellants not Respondent to be included on the Title Deeds .

Music from Bensound.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/20217131Sat, 23 Nov 2019 15:28:38 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe issue before the Supreme Court of Zambia was if One half of the Siwale Children herein ("Henry Mpanjilwa Siwale ;Reverend Ewen Siwale ,Kelvin Siwale and others being children of the Deceased Donaldo Siwale) were entitled to be included on the...
The Late Donaldo Siwale had left 400 Hectreas of Customary Land which the Respondent then placed on Title in his name only without his elder brothers have a clue.

Note : I meant to say the Supreme Court of Zambia granted judgement for the Appellants not Respondent to be included on the Title Deeds .

Music from Bensound.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>824educational,landlaw,legal-podcastfalse14fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/micheal-chilufya-sata-v-zambia-bottlers-limited-supreme-court-of-zambia-no-1-of-2003--20405923
Music from Bensound .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/20405923Sun, 01 Dec 2019 14:54:12 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe Supreme Court of Zambia was asked by Appellant to decided as to whether the High-Court of Zambia had erred in Law by not following the case of Donoghue v Stevenson (English Judgement) by herein Stating that he did not consume the adulterated drink...
Music from Bensound .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>786false15fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/new-plast-industries-v-commissioner-of-lands-and-attorney-general-s-c-z-no-8-of-2001--21570992






Music by Bensound

(c) 2019

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/21570992Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:05:44 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThis appeal before the Supreme Court of Zambia discusses he mode of commencement for Civil proceedings in the High-Court for Zambia . Music by Bensound (c) 2019






Music by Bensound

(c) 2019

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>901false16fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/zambia-sugar-plc-v-fellow-nanzaluka-appeal-no-82-of-2001--23926091
(i) Whether International Agreements that have not been domesticated despite been ratified and assented to by the State are applied in Zambia; and

(ii) Whether Judges can cite International Agreements that are yet to be domesticated as an Act of Parliament .

Music by Bensound

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/23926091Mon, 16 Mar 2020 07:54:56 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe issues that the Supreme Court of Zambia had to decided were; (i) Whether International Agreements that have not been domesticated despite been ratified and assented to by the State are applied in Zambia; and (ii) Whether Judges can cite...
(i) Whether International Agreements that have not been domesticated despite been ratified and assented to by the State are applied in Zambia; and

(ii) Whether Judges can cite International Agreements that are yet to be domesticated as an Act of Parliament .

Music by Bensound

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>793internationallaw,legalpodcast,podcastfalse17fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/dh-brothers-industries-pty-limited-v-olivine-indsutries-pty-limited-s-c-z-10-2012--28806764
whether or not a proprietor of unregistered Trademark , can prevent another person or company from registering that trademark .

Music by "BenSound"

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/28806764Mon, 01 Jun 2020 12:07:17 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe main argument in this Intellectual Property dispute was; whether or not a proprietor of unregistered Trademark , can prevent another person or company from registering that trademark . Music by "BenSound"
whether or not a proprietor of unregistered Trademark , can prevent another person or company from registering that trademark .

Music by "BenSound"

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>803false18fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/angel-musonda-vs-pulse-finance-service-limited-court-of-appeal-no-132-2017--29825390
According to the brief facts , Angel Musonda (The Appellant) had entered into a Loan argeement with Pulse Finance Services Limited (The Respondent) and had agreed to pay back the money in a period of 36 months .However, The Appellant seriously defaulted on her loan agreement and the Respondent seized the Truck and sold it for ZMW 20,000.00 so it could cover it's money . The Respondent got ZMW 17,000.00

The Appellant brought this matter to Court on the premise that it's was illegal for the Respondent to have sold the Truck as a result this lead to damages to the Appellant's business life , Angel Musonda therefore want the Court to order the Respondent to pay him damages to this effect .

Music by Bensound ..

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/29825390Sun, 07 Jun 2020 14:51:20 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThis was an appeal from the Judgement of the High Court for Zambia that the Plaintiff having defaulted on the Loan agreement between itself and the Defendant . The Plaintiff therefore owed an outstanding amount of ZMW 36,642.71 and that the Defendant...
According to the brief facts , Angel Musonda (The Appellant) had entered into a Loan argeement with Pulse Finance Services Limited (The Respondent) and had agreed to pay back the money in a period of 36 months .However, The Appellant seriously defaulted on her loan agreement and the Respondent seized the Truck and sold it for ZMW 20,000.00 so it could cover it's money . The Respondent got ZMW 17,000.00

The Appellant brought this matter to Court on the premise that it's was illegal for the Respondent to have sold the Truck as a result this lead to damages to the Appellant's business life , Angel Musonda therefore want the Court to order the Respondent to pay him damages to this effect .

Music by Bensound ..

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>882contractlaw,legalpodcast,loanagreementsfalse19fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/associated-chemicals-limited-v-hill-and-delamain-zambia-and-ellis-and-company-as-law-firm-1998-s-j-7-sc--35871876
The Crux of the Appellant's argument in the Supreme Court of Zambia was that due to a clause in the Shareholder Purchase Agreement (Associated Chemicals Limited) , The old shareholders(Two Patels) and no either the Company nor thr new shareholder (Mr Kilasa) were liable for this debt owed to the Respondent as the Agreement had an indemnify clause that stated the previous Shareholders would undertake to settle financial liabilities incurred prior to the sale of the Share.

This case therefore looked into the principals relating to the Legal Status of a Company and the difference between a Shareholder and a Company .
This is also a Landmark Judgement on Company Law in Zambia and is still good Law .

Music by BensSound .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/35871876Sat, 04 Jul 2020 08:16:16 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe Respondent in the Supreme Court of.Zambia ("Hill and Delamain Zambia Limited") had taken out Court Process ( Writ of Summons + Statement of Claim) to recover monies owed for services rendered at the instance and request of the Appellant in the...
The Crux of the Appellant's argument in the Supreme Court of Zambia was that due to a clause in the Shareholder Purchase Agreement (Associated Chemicals Limited) , The old shareholders(Two Patels) and no either the Company nor thr new shareholder (Mr Kilasa) were liable for this debt owed to the Respondent as the Agreement had an indemnify clause that stated the previous Shareholders would undertake to settle financial liabilities incurred prior to the sale of the Share.

This case therefore looked into the principals relating to the Legal Status of a Company and the difference between a Shareholder and a Company .
This is also a Landmark Judgement on Company Law in Zambia and is still good Law .

Music by BensSound .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>839companylaw,legal,podcastfalse110fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/fredrick-m-kunda-vs-the-people-appeal-no-37-2020--40581851
The High Court For Zambia which passed sentencing due to the limitation power of the Magistrate, give the offender, 25 Years imprisonment with Hard Labour .

The Appellant now brought his matter before the Supreme Court of Zambia in a bid to overturn his conviction on the basis of inter alia (Among other thing) that the manner in how the Magistrate received was not correct as the voire dire was defective .

Music by Bensound.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/40581851Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:02:34 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThis is an Appeal from the Judgement of the Subordinate Court (Herein also known as the Magistrate Court) in which it found the Appellant guilty of the offence of defilement of a 7 year old Children . The High Court For Zambia which passed sentencing...
The High Court For Zambia which passed sentencing due to the limitation power of the Magistrate, give the offender, 25 Years imprisonment with Hard Labour .

The Appellant now brought his matter before the Supreme Court of Zambia in a bid to overturn his conviction on the basis of inter alia (Among other thing) that the manner in how the Magistrate received was not correct as the voire dire was defective .

Music by Bensound.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>887criminal-justice,criminal-justice-system,criminallawfalse111fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/conclusion-on-the-appeal-case-of-frederick-m-kunda--40582091
The episode also talks about Section 122 of the Juveniles Act,Chapter 53 of the Laws of Zambia and how a Child will be treated as a witness and the criminal law procedural that ought to be followed by the trial court in such cases .

Music by Bensound .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/40582091Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:27:04 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThis is a conclusion episode concerning the case of Fredrick .M.Kunda . This episode gives a deeper analysis of why the Supreme Court of Zambia reversed the Judgement of the Subordinate Court, which relied on a specific Criminal provision of the Law...
The episode also talks about Section 122 of the Juveniles Act,Chapter 53 of the Laws of Zambia and how a Child will be treated as a witness and the criminal law procedural that ought to be followed by the trial court in such cases .

Music by Bensound .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>884criminal,criminaljustice,criminallawfalse112fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-long-awaited-return--46219478
If you have a case you would to be featured on the podcast ,get in touch with me through the details listed below.

Email: georgemalipilo23@gmail.com
Facebook Messenger: George Chintankwa Malipilo .
Thankyou very much for taking the time to listen to the podcast.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/46219478Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:41:13 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe episode explains the changes that have been implemented so as to deliver a better podcast for the various listeners. In addition, this episode provides the listeners with an insight of the new addition features and changes that been applied to the...
If you have a case you would to be featured on the podcast ,get in touch with me through the details listed below.

Email: georgemalipilo23@gmail.com
Facebook Messenger: George Chintankwa Malipilo .
Thankyou very much for taking the time to listen to the podcast.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>477educational,law,legalawareness,legalpodcast,spreakerpodcastfalse113fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/patrick-sakala-vs-the-people-1980-z-r-205-s-c--47135323
The Brief facts of this Appeal Case before the Supreme Court of Zambia is that Patrick Sakala was convicted for the offence of murder pursuant to Section 200 of the Penal Code. Patrick Sakala had murdered a four year old boy after the boy's mother had refused the advancement made by Patrick Sakala.

The issue for determination was whether or not Patrick Sakala had actually killed the boy keeping in mind that the were no eye witness or actual medical report submitted and other circumstances that may have caused the death had not been ruled out .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/47135323Mon, 25 Oct 2021 05:24:04 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThis case deals with conviction of an accused person on purely indirect evidence (Circumstantial Evidence) without any eye witness present at the scene of the crime . The Brief facts of this Appeal Case before the Supreme Court of Zambia is that...
The Brief facts of this Appeal Case before the Supreme Court of Zambia is that Patrick Sakala was convicted for the offence of murder pursuant to Section 200 of the Penal Code. Patrick Sakala had murdered a four year old boy after the boy's mother had refused the advancement made by Patrick Sakala.

The issue for determination was whether or not Patrick Sakala had actually killed the boy keeping in mind that the were no eye witness or actual medical report submitted and other circumstances that may have caused the death had not been ruled out .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>907criminallaw,legalpodcast,tczclpfalse114fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/arthur-lubinda-wina-frederick-titus-jacob-chiluba-veron-johnson-mwaanga-and-others-v-the-attorney-general-1990-1992-z-r-95-h-c--47807054
This was a Constitutional matter before the High Court that was tasked with determining whether or not the President of the Republic of Zambia has the legitimate authority/power to issue directives to limit access to the usage of Public Owned Media Houses by opposition political parties.

Brief Background to matter.

The President of the Republic of Zambia in 1990, The late Dr. Kenneth David Kunda had, at a news conference, issued a directive that certain government owned newspapers were not to provide coverage to or accept advertisements from the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (“MMD”), the main opposition political party at the time.

The petitioners as a result of the said decision by the then President did herein apply to the High Court for on order quashing and setting aside the directive given by the President limiting access to Government owned media houses to the opposition, as it was the petitioners view that the said directive violated their rights in terms of article 22 and 25 of the Constitution of Zambia,1991.

Kindly note that at 10:23 of this episode, the Host does make mention that the Constitutional Court has been given authority to adjudicate on Constitutional violation. Please be informed that the correct Constitutional provision is Article 128 of the Constitution of Zambia (Amendment No.2 of 2016) .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/47807054Mon, 06 Dec 2021 16:04:06 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOLaw Issue in this case. This was a Constitutional matter before the High Court that was tasked with determining whether or not the President of the Republic of Zambia has the legitimate authority/power to issue directives to limit access to the usage...
This was a Constitutional matter before the High Court that was tasked with determining whether or not the President of the Republic of Zambia has the legitimate authority/power to issue directives to limit access to the usage of Public Owned Media Houses by opposition political parties.

Brief Background to matter.

The President of the Republic of Zambia in 1990, The late Dr. Kenneth David Kunda had, at a news conference, issued a directive that certain government owned newspapers were not to provide coverage to or accept advertisements from the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (“MMD”), the main opposition political party at the time.

The petitioners as a result of the said decision by the then President did herein apply to the High Court for on order quashing and setting aside the directive given by the President limiting access to Government owned media houses to the opposition, as it was the petitioners view that the said directive violated their rights in terms of article 22 and 25 of the Constitution of Zambia,1991.

Kindly note that at 10:23 of this episode, the Host does make mention that the Constitutional Court has been given authority to adjudicate on Constitutional violation. Please be informed that the correct Constitutional provision is Article 128 of the Constitution of Zambia (Amendment No.2 of 2016) .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>847constitutionallaw,legalpodcastfalse115fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/sithole-v-sithole-1969-z-r-92-high-court-judgment--48448969(i) Which ceremony between the Customary Marriage or the Stautory Marriage created the marriage ?;
(ii) Did the Marriage Ordiance Act Allow for a conversion of a vaild potentially polygamous marriage to a valid monogamous marriage? , and
(ii) Did the High-Court have jurisdiction under the Matrimonial Cause Rules 1968 to entertain the said Petition and adjudicate the said matter?

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/48448969Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:00:02 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe issues for determination in this Divorce Case before the High-Court of the Republic of Zambia were as follows ; (i) Which ceremony between the Customary Marriage or the Stautory Marriage created the marriage ?; (ii) Did the Marriage Ordiance Act...(i) Which ceremony between the Customary Marriage or the Stautory Marriage created the marriage ?;
(ii) Did the Marriage Ordiance Act Allow for a conversion of a vaild potentially polygamous marriage to a valid monogamous marriage? , and
(ii) Did the High-Court have jurisdiction under the Matrimonial Cause Rules 1968 to entertain the said Petition and adjudicate the said matter?

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>532azclp,customarylaw,divorcelaw,statutorymarriage,zambiafamilylawfalse116fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/lindiwe-k-chinyanta-v-doreen-c-tembo-scz-judgment-no-28-of-2007--48545772(i)Does the surviving spouse have a prior eligibility to be appointed as administrator over the deceased‘s relatives? ;

(ii)Whether the surviving spouse should be informed and consulted before the appointed of the administrator?

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/48545772Fri, 04 Feb 2022 06:00:02 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe Issues for determination in this matter were; (i)Does the surviving spouse have a prior eligibility to be appointed as administrator over the deceased‘s relatives? ; (ii)Whether the surviving spouse should be informed and consulted before the...(i)Does the surviving spouse have a prior eligibility to be appointed as administrator over the deceased‘s relatives? ;

(ii)Whether the surviving spouse should be informed and consulted before the appointed of the administrator?

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>565legalpodcast,mazclp,successionfalse117fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/thomas-mumba-vs-the-people-zr-83-hc--53074438
" Whether Section 15 (1) of the Corrupt Practices Act contravened Article 20 (7) of the Constitution of Zambia?".


N.B: Kindly note this podcast does not provide any legal advice as it is only for educational purposes.If you need legal advice , please engage a legal Practitioner.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53074438Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:00:02 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe issue for determination by the High-Court of the Republic of Zambia was: " Whether Section 15 (1) of the Corrupt Practices Act contravened Article 20 (7) of the Constitution of Zambia?". N.B: Kindly note this podcast does not provide any legal...
" Whether Section 15 (1) of the Corrupt Practices Act contravened Article 20 (7) of the Constitution of Zambia?".


N.B: Kindly note this podcast does not provide any legal advice as it is only for educational purposes.If you need legal advice , please engage a legal Practitioner.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>1003false118fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/godfrey-miyanda-vs-the-high-court-1984-z-r-62-s-c--53148863
(i) Does the Supreme Court of the Republic Of Zambia have power to listen to an application on first instance? ;

(ii) Can the Supreme Court of the Republic Of Zambia order a Judge of the High-Court to perform their judiciary functions?



Disclaimer : This is an educational podcast on the law and does not provide any leagal advise . Please contact a lawyer if you require legal advise.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53148863Fri, 10 Mar 2023 06:00:03 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe issues for determination in this Case were as follows ; (i) Does the Supreme Court of the Republic Of Zambia have power to listen to an application on first instance? ; (ii) Can the Supreme Court of the Republic Of Zambia order a Judge of the...
(i) Does the Supreme Court of the Republic Of Zambia have power to listen to an application on first instance? ;

(ii) Can the Supreme Court of the Republic Of Zambia order a Judge of the High-Court to perform their judiciary functions?



Disclaimer : This is an educational podcast on the law and does not provide any leagal advise . Please contact a lawyer if you require legal advise.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>924false119fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/lieutenant-chrispine-s-muchindu-v-the-attorney-general-2021-ccz-0034--53225991
"Whether the petitoner was entitled to be retained on the Respondent's payroll following his retirement until payment of his pension benefit?"

Disclaimer : This podcast does not provide any legal advise as it is for educational purposes . Please ensure you seek advice from a practitioner whenever a dispute arises .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53225991Fri, 17 Mar 2023 06:30:02 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe Constitutional Court of the Republic of Zambia had to determine: "Whether the petitoner was entitled to be retained on the Respondent's payroll following his retirement until payment of his pension benefit?" Disclaimer : This podcast does not...
"Whether the petitoner was entitled to be retained on the Respondent's payroll following his retirement until payment of his pension benefit?"

Disclaimer : This podcast does not provide any legal advise as it is for educational purposes . Please ensure you seek advice from a practitioner whenever a dispute arises .

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>544false120fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/musa-ahmed-adam-yousuf-v-mahtani-group-of-companies-and-3-others-2011-hpc-0081--53266075
Whether a legal practitioner can commence proceedings in his personal capacity requesting for payment of legal fees ; and

Whether a legal practitioner can practice and represent clients independent of a law firm ? .


N.B: This Podcast is for educational purposes only and does not render any legal advise . Please get in touch with a legal practitioner for legal representation.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53266075Fri, 24 Mar 2023 06:30:01 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe High Court for Zambia had to determine , inter alia , the following issues ; Whether a legal practitioner can commence proceedings in his personal capacity requesting for payment of legal fees ; and Whether a legal practitioner can practice and...
Whether a legal practitioner can commence proceedings in his personal capacity requesting for payment of legal fees ; and

Whether a legal practitioner can practice and represent clients independent of a law firm ? .


N.B: This Podcast is for educational purposes only and does not render any legal advise . Please get in touch with a legal practitioner for legal representation.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>979false21fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/p-c-cheelo-and-9-others-v-zambia-consolidated-copper-mines-limited-s-c-z-judgment-no-27-of-1999--53342583
Please note that I did mention the case of ZANACO v Martin Musonda, However, the case is a Constitutional Court Judgment and not a Supreme Court Judgment as mentioned.

I did mention other cases similar to the P.C.Cheelo, that haven been decided by the Court of Appeal for Zambia and our Supreme Court: Full citation of the said cases are listed below.

• Cosmas Mukuka v Jason Mwansa SCZ Selected Judgment No.13 of 2019

• Cavmont Bank Limited v John Mwansa Kalinde and 40 Others Appeal No.309/2021

Links to My 2 Cents Episodes on Jurisdiction.

Godfrey Miyanda vs The High Court ( Episode 19)- Season One
Link : https://www.spreaker.com/episode/53148863

Sithole v Sithole (Episode 16) - Season One
Link: https://www.spreaker.com/episode/48448969

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/53342583Fri, 31 Mar 2023 06:30:02 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThe Supreme Court for Zambia had to determine the issue of whether between the Industrial Relations Court or High Court, which Court has jurisdiction to deal with employment matters for terminal benefits and redundancy packages. Please note that I...
Please note that I did mention the case of ZANACO v Martin Musonda, However, the case is a Constitutional Court Judgment and not a Supreme Court Judgment as mentioned.

I did mention other cases similar to the P.C.Cheelo, that haven been decided by the Court of Appeal for Zambia and our Supreme Court: Full citation of the said cases are listed below.

• Cosmas Mukuka v Jason Mwansa SCZ Selected Judgment No.13 of 2019

• Cavmont Bank Limited v John Mwansa Kalinde and 40 Others Appeal No.309/2021

Links to My 2 Cents Episodes on Jurisdiction.

Godfrey Miyanda vs The High Court ( Episode 19)- Season One
Link : https://www.spreaker.com/episode/53148863

Sithole v Sithole (Episode 16) - Season One
Link: https://www.spreaker.com/episode/48448969

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>1120false22fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/nooria-patel-vs-ahmead-patel-scz-judgment-no-50-of-2016--70546958
The case follows Nooria’s attempt to petition for divorce after her husband pronounced Talaq, raising an important legal question about the application of the Matrimonial Causes Act to religious marriages in Zambia. The Supreme Court of Zambia ultimately determines whether such marriages fall within the Court’s authority. ⚖️

Links to My two Cents Episodes on Jurisdiction.

Godfrey Miyanda vs The High Court ( Episode 19)- Season One
Link : https://www.spreaker.com/episode/53148863

Sithole v Sithole (Episode 16) - Season One
Link: https://www.spreaker.com/episode/48448969

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/70546958Mon, 09 Mar 2026 12:31:39 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOIn this episode, we examine whether the High Court of Zambia has jurisdiction to dissolve a marriage contracted under Sunni Muslim Law. The case follows Nooria’s attempt to petition for divorce after her husband pronounced Talaq, raising an important...
The case follows Nooria’s attempt to petition for divorce after her husband pronounced Talaq, raising an important legal question about the application of the Matrimonial Causes Act to religious marriages in Zambia. The Supreme Court of Zambia ultimately determines whether such marriages fall within the Court’s authority. ⚖️

Links to My two Cents Episodes on Jurisdiction.

Godfrey Miyanda vs The High Court ( Episode 19)- Season One
Link : https://www.spreaker.com/episode/53148863

Sithole v Sithole (Episode 16) - Season One
Link: https://www.spreaker.com/episode/48448969

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>540false23fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/davies-kebby-nyirongo-vs-rockstone-industry-company-limited-2015-hp-0058--70810778

This follows the case of Davies Kebby Nyirongo v Rockstone Industry Company Limited, where Davies Kebby Nyirongo  sought to recover a 10% commission for facilitating a land transaction under a verbal agreement, which the Defendant refused to pay him. 

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this podcast does not create a lawyer–client relationship. For advice on any legal matter, please consult a qualified legal practitioner.


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/70810778Sun, 22 Mar 2026 11:50:16 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOIn this episode, we examine whether a person is entitled to a commission for assisting in the purchase or sale of property, or whether one must be a licensed real estate agent to lawfully claim such commission. This follows the case of Davies Kebby...

This follows the case of Davies Kebby Nyirongo v Rockstone Industry Company Limited, where Davies Kebby Nyirongo  sought to recover a 10% commission for facilitating a land transaction under a verbal agreement, which the Defendant refused to pay him. 

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this podcast does not create a lawyer–client relationship. For advice on any legal matter, please consult a qualified legal practitioner.


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>618false24fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/gilbert-chikoti-vs-zesco-limited-scz-8-311-2013--72119499

The Court held that the responsibility to install protective devices such as surge arrestors lies with the customer and reaffirmed that ZESCO’s responsibility ends at the meter box under the ZESCO By-Laws. The appeal was ultimately dismissed.

This episode also highlights the importance of properly pleading negligence claims in civil litigation.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this podcast does not create a lawyer–client relationship. For advice on any legal matter, please consult a qualified legal practitioner.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72119499Fri, 22 May 2026 19:08:08 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOIn this episode, we discuss the Supreme Court decision in Gilbert Chikoti v. ZESCO Limited, where the Court considered whether ZESCO could be held liable for a house fire allegedly caused by a power surge after electricity was restored following an...

The Court held that the responsibility to install protective devices such as surge arrestors lies with the customer and reaffirmed that ZESCO’s responsibility ends at the meter box under the ZESCO By-Laws. The appeal was ultimately dismissed.

This episode also highlights the importance of properly pleading negligence claims in civil litigation.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this podcast does not create a lawyer–client relationship. For advice on any legal matter, please consult a qualified legal practitioner.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>844false25fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/alexander-zimba-vs-geraldine-namwaka-lukonga-and-karen-lukonga-beneficiary-of-the-estate-of-the-late-edwin-wamulwa-lukonga--72220578
Please note that at 10:17 of the podcast, I mention “Alexander Geraldine” when I was meant to say “Geraldine Lukonga.”


This podcast is strictly for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or the provision of legal services.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72220578Fri, 29 May 2026 06:01:41 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOThis episode discusses a Court of Appeal decision on whether an administrator of an estate can mortgage estate property for a personal loan. The Court held that an administrator has no authority under the Intestate Succession Act to use estate...
Please note that at 10:17 of the podcast, I mention “Alexander Geraldine” when I was meant to say “Geraldine Lukonga.”


This podcast is strictly for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or the provision of legal services.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>714false26fullhttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/martha-mushipe-vs-gaudensia-rossi-appeal-no-12-2022--72290970

The discussion also explores the circumstances under which expenses incurred in administering an estate may be recovered after probate has been set aside.

This is an insightful episode for legal practitioners, law students, and anyone interested in succession law, probate practice, and estate planning.

This podcast is produced strictly for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or the provision of legal services.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>https://api.spreaker.com/episode/72290970Fri, 05 Jun 2026 06:12:03 +0000GEORGE MALIPILOIn this episode, we examine a decision of the Supreme Court of Zambia concerning the estate of the late Funny Lungu. The case considers whether a lawyer who drafted a Will can subsequently claim to have been appointed as executor or legal counsel to...

The discussion also explores the circumstances under which expenses incurred in administering an estate may be recovered after probate has been set aside.

This is an insightful episode for legal practitioners, law students, and anyone interested in succession law, probate practice, and estate planning.

This podcast is produced strictly for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or the provision of legal services.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/my-two-cents-a-zambian-case-law-podcast--4068826/support.]]>1063false27full