00:00
28:53
The fifth show in our series is with Owen Mullan, Advocate, of Mackinnon Advocates. You can find out about him here:

www.mullanadvocate.co.uk

We discuss the following case:

= Beurskens v HM Advocate =

Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary

26 February 2013

[2014] HJAC 99

Were signed statements taken by police officers on the instructions of the procurator fiscal "precognitions" and therefore inadmissable as evidence?

Judgment: http://tinyurl.com/Beurskens-v-HMA

Owen's blog: http://www.mullanadvocate.co.uk/beurskens-v-hma-precognition-or-statement/

== About the series ==

You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook:

www.facebook.com/podslawjk

You can also subscribe through iTunes:

www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes
The fifth show in our series is with Owen Mullan, Advocate, of Mackinnon Advocates. You can find out about him here: www.mullanadvocate.co.uk We discuss the following case: = Beurskens v HM Advocate = Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary 26 February 2013 [2014] HJAC 99 Were signed statements taken by police officers on the instructions of the procurator fiscal "precognitions" and therefore inadmissable as evidence? Judgment: http://tinyurl.com/Beurskens-v-HMA Owen's blog: http://www.mullanadvocate.co.uk/beurskens-v-hma-precognition-or-statement/ == About the series == You can follow the show on twitter (@podslaw), where every new episode will be announced, and like the show on Facebook: www.facebook.com/podslawjk You can also subscribe through iTunes: www.tinyurl.com/podslaw-iTunes read more read less

9 years ago #crime, #evidence, #justiciary, #precognition, #scotland